Previous Page Table of Contents Next Page


USING STATE-OF-THE-ART RS AND GIS FOR MONITORING WATERLOGGING AND SALINITY - Salman Asif and Mubeen-ul-Din Ahmad

Salman Asif and Mubeen-ul-Din Ahmad
GIS specialists, International Water-Management Institute
Lahore, Pakistan

INTRODUCTION

At present rates of population growth, global food needs will increase while soil and water resources for new crop production will be limited and their quality will diminish. Protection of soil resources and conservation of water are high on the agenda, because irrigated agriculture is one of the biggest producers of food. In arid and semi-arid regions, irrigation has brought about environmental problems of waterlogging and salinity. According to the United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (UN-ESCAP), affected areas exceed 1 million ha in Cambodia and Thailand, 3 million ha in Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Mongolia and Malaysia, 10 million ha in Pakistan and Indonesia, 20 million ha in China, India and Iran and over 350 million ha in Australia. The total area affected by salinity is estimated to exceed 500 million ha (Szabolcs, 1979).

SALINITY PROBLEMS IN THE INDUS BASIN IRRIGATION SYSTEM

The problem faced in Pakistan is of staggering proportions and is the major factor preventing agricultural productivity increases. Geologically, this part of the sub-continent, including the Indus plain, was formed from alluvium deposited by rivers into a shallow sea. The receding sea left residues of salts in soil profiles and aquifers. Minerals in parent rocks released significant quantities of salts into the soil through weathering. Under prevailing climatic conditions, salts released through weathering are not leached out of soils. Irrigation in arid and semi-arid areas leads to accumulations of salt at the soil surface. Salinization occurs naturally - fossil salinity - and as a consequence of poor irrigation practices - secondary salinity.

Fossil salinity occurs at margins of natural depressions, where rain and floodwater accumulate. The soil becomes loaded with salts because of capillary rise of water to the surface. Land affected by fossil salinity is generally severely saline and is not easily reclaimed. Secondary salinity, resulting from modern irrigation, occurs because of accelerated redistribution of salts in the profile by high watertables or use of insufficient water to leach salts out of the soil. Insufficient storage capacity with existing dams has led to conjunctive use of surface and groundwater in most areas. Water from tubewells contains varying amounts of salts, and injudicious use has contributed significantly to salinization of surface soils after periods of capillary rise or when fluctuating watertables reach the surface (Khan, 1993). The process of secondary salinization is represented in Figure 1.

Figure 1. Vicious cycle of salinization and watertable rise

PROBLEMS ASSOCIATED WITH SALINITY AND WATERLOGGING MANAGEMENT

"If you can't measure it, you can't manage it."

Pakistan has tried to overcome the menace of salinity and waterlogging by establishing the following bodies responsible for measuring its extent and taking remedial measures:

Conventional techniques such as geochemical measurement are expensive and time consuming, and accuracy is questionable for large areas. A list of salinity surveys is given in Table 1.

Table 1. Salinity surveys in Pakistan

Survey

Salt-affected area
(million ha)

Colombo plan (1958)

2.3

WASID* (1964)

1.2

DLR (1970)

1.3

WASID (1975)

2.4

WAPDA (1975)

3.7

SSP (1980)

0.6

WAPDA (1981)

1.4

SSP (1983)

2.6

NCA (1983)

0.6

* Water and Soil Investigation Division

Variation of salt-affected land does not necessarily reflect the dynamics of salinization; it could result from different approaches to sampling and salinity assessment, including:

The result is divergence of conclusions as to the nature and extent of saline areas.

It is becoming increasingly important to use standardized techniques to assess salinity. GIS and RS techniques can play an important role in monitoring soil to locate and evaluate the extent of saline areas and improve the situation through enhanced understanding.

THE ROLE OF RS IN IDENTIFYING WATERLOGGING AND SALINITY

Satellite images can help in assessing the extent of waterlogged and saline areas and monitoring the extent and severity of changes in real time.

Direct estimates

Saline fields are often identified by the presence of spotty white patches of precipitated salts. Such precipitates usually occur in elevated or unvegetated areas, where water evaporates and leaves salt behind. Such salt crusts, which can be detected on satellite images, are not reliable evidence of high salinity in the root zone.

Indirect estimates

Salinity is a dynamic process. To assess the extent of salinity, modelling is often required. One of the main problems of dealing with large areas is lack of information about water-balance components. RS can provide useful information for large-area water and salt balances and identification of parameters such as evapo-transpiration, rainfall distribution, interception losses and crop types and intensities that can be used as indirect measures of salinity and waterlogging and as evidence for direct estimates (Ahmad, 1999).

ATTEMPTS TO IDENTIFY WATERLOGGING AND SALINITY WORLDWIDE

IWMI has already reviewed different RS applications for water-resources management (Bastiaanssen, 1998). Part of the section related to salinity is summarized here.

Changes in the reflectance, composition and morphology of a single leaf can be used to detect salinity effects at an early stage. Mougenot, Pouget and Epema (1993) noted that "visible reflectance of leaves from plants growing on salt-affected soils is lower than reflectance of non-salt-affected leaves before plant maturation and higher after. Near-infrared reflectance increases without water stress due to a succulent (cell thickening) effect and increases in other cases."

Bands in the near- and middle-infrared spectral bands give information on soil moisture and salinity (Mulders, 1987; Agbu, Fehrenbacher and Jansen, 1990). Steven et al. (1992) confirmed this by showing that near- to middle-infrared indices are indicators for chlorosis in stressed crops (normalized difference for Thematic Mapper [TM] bands 4 and 5). This new ratio is immune to colour variations and provides an indication of leaf water potential. Steven et al. (1992) showed that chlorotic canopies could be distinguished from healthy canopies. Biophysical response to a salty environment is manifested in low fractional vegetation cover, low leaf-area index (LAI), high albedo, low surface roughness and high surface resistance compared with healthy crops.

RS investigations on soil salinity can be divided into identification of salt-affected and cropped soils and mineralogy.

Salinized and cropped areas can be identified with a salinity index based on greenness and brightness that indicates leaf moisture influenced by salinity, with classical false-colour composites of separated bands or with a computer-assisted land-surface classification (Kauth and Thomas 1976; Hardisky, Klemas and Daiber, 1983; Steven et al., 1992; Vincent et al., 1996). A brightness index detects brightness appearing at high levels of salinity. The contribution of false-colour composites and visual interpretations is demonstrated in studies from India given in Table 2. Geomorphological patterns are helpful in distinguishing salinization. Aerial photography, often mentioned as a suitable solution, falls outside the scope of this review on satellite RS.

Table 2 shows that TM bands 5 and 7 are frequently used to detect soil salinity or drainage anomalies (Mulders and Epema, 1986; Menenti, Lorkeers and Vissers, 1986; Zuluaga, 1990; Vincent et al., 1996). The physiological condition of a crop is shown best at TM 5 and 7; TM bands 3 and 4 are better suited to describing overall crop development. Most of the studies in Table 2 are based on multispectral scanner (MSS) and TM data, because the Satellite pour l'Observation de la Terre (SPOT) and the Indian Remote Sensing Satellite (IRS) have no bands greater than 1.7 mm. Joshi and Sahai (1993) found that TM, which had an accuracy of 90 percent for soil salinity mapping, was better than MSS, which was 74 percent accurate. Goossens, et al. (1993) compared the accuracy of TM, MSS, and SPOT and found TM to be the best multispectral radiometer for soil-salinity mapping.

Johnston and Barson (1990) reviewed RS applications in Australia. They found that identification of saline areas was most successful during peak vegetation growth. In other periods, low fractional vegetation cover in salinized areas could not be distinguished from areas that were bare because of overgrazing, erosion or ploughing. Siderius (1991) concluded the opposite: salinity is best seen at the end of irrigation or the rainy season when the plots are bare. Goossens et al. (1993) analysed the growing season in the western Nile delta, showing that mono-temporal images are suitable for detecting severely salinized soils but that more gradations can be determined through a multitemporal approach. Venkataratnam (1983) used MSS images of pre-monsoon, post-monsoon and harvest seasons to map soil salinity in the Punjab. He concluded that the spectral curves of highly and moderately saline soils change considerably during the annual cycle, which significantly complicates the time-compositing procedure.

The investigations of Vidal et al. (1996) in Morocco and Vincent et al. (1996) in Pakistan are based on a classification-tree procedure. The first treatment is to mask vegetation from non-vegetation using normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI). Then the brightness index is calculated to detect moisture and salinity on fallow land and abandoned fields. The approach of Vincent et al. (1996) was suitable for locating blocks that had malfunctioning drainage networks. Two classes based on levels of soil salinity could be mapped with an accuracy of 70 percent. Areas of high salinity were 66 percent accurate and nonsaline areas were 80 percent accurate.

Table 2. Literature on detection of soil salinity

Source

Study area

Sensor

Methodology

Chaturvedi et al., 1983

South Dakota, USA

PMW

Brightness/temperature

Mulders and Epema, 1986

Tunisia

TM 5, 7

Digital classification

Menenti, Lorkeers and Vissers, 1986

Tunisia

TM 5, 6, 7, albedo

Digital classification

Everitt et al., 1988

Texas, USA

Video imagery

False-colour composite

Sharma and Bhargava, 1988

Uttar Pradesh, India

NISS

False-colour composite

Singh and Dwivedi, 1989

Uttar Pradesh, India

NISS

Supervised classification

Timmerman, 1989

Qattara Depression, Egypt

TM 5, 6, albedo

Supervised classification

Singh and Srivastav, 1990

Gujarat, India

PMW, C-band

Brightness/temperature

Saha, Kudrat and Bhan, 1990

Uttar Pradesh, India

TM

Digital classification

Zuluaga, 1990

Mendoza, Argentina

TM 4, 5, 7

Classification

Rao et al., 1991

Uttar Pradesh, India

TM 2, 3, 4

False-colour composite

Steven et al., 1992

USA

TM 4, 5

Near/mid infrared difference

Wiegand, Everitt and Richardson, 1992

USA

XS

Multiple regression

Joshi and Sahai, 1993

Saurashtra Coast, India

MSS, TM

False-colour composite

Goossens et al., 1993

Western Delta, Egypt

MSS, XS, TM

Supervised classification

Casas, 1995

Tamaulipas, Mexico

XS 3, TM 5

Brightness, supervised classification

Brena, Sanvicente and Pulido, 1995

El Carrizo, Sonora, Mexico

TM 2, 3, 4

Multiple regression

Mirabile et al., 1995

Mendoza, Argentina

TM 3, 5

Kauth-Thomas index

Vincent et al., 1995

Gharb Plain, Morocco

XS 1, 2, 3

Greenness, brightness, classification tree

Vincent et al.,1996

Punjab, Pakistan

XS

Greenness, brightness, classification tree

Dwivedi, 1996

Uttar Pradesh, India

MSS 1, 2, 3, 4

Principal component

Vidal et al., 1996

Punjab, Pakistan

XS

Greenness, brightness, classification tree

Chaturvedi et al. (1983) and Singh and Srivastav (1990) used microwave brightness and thermal infrared temperatures synergistically. The microwave signal was interpreted physically by means of a two-layer model of fresh and saline groundwater. Synergetic use of satellite measurements to map soil salinity physically is a new concept; although results were not perfect, the integration of multiple-sensor data has set new directions for research on soil salinization. The physical conditions of the surface soil can be obtained with optical and passive microwave data. The larger L-band and P-band wavelengths are capable of penetrating soil and retrieving information from deeper layers rather than just from the surface.

Goossens et al. (1993) presented an example of a contextual classifier for soil salinity mapping. They built a GIS to link the location of the irrigation feeders and drainage master canals in the western Nile delta with digital elevation data and satellite classifications. Soil-salinity risks are considered to be proportional to distance and elevation differences of fields with respect to main irrigation canals. TM bands 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 were used to classify three different stages of waterlogging.

Although the combined GIS/RS approach published by Cialella et al. (1997) for predicting soil drainage classes does not focus on soil salinity, its method is worth mentioning. Soil drainage was studied by means of a classification-tree analysis using airborne NDVI data, digital elevation data and soil types.

Verma et al. (1994) combined the TM false-colour composite (FCC) bands 2, 3 and 4 with thermal data at 10.4-12.5 mm to solve the problem of spectral similarity where the dull-white tone of salt-affected and sandy soils has been difficult to distinguish. They found the data between March and first week of April significantly better because of maximum contrast. They classified salt-affected soils in Etah, Aligarh, Mainpuri and Mathura districts into S1: <10 percent of the salt-affected area, S2: 10-30 percent, S3: 30-50 percent, S4: 50-75 percent and S5: >75 percent, using the integrated approach to image interpretation.

Dwivedi and Rao (1992) adopted a quantitative approach to identify the most appropriate three-band combination of Landsat TM reflective-band data for identifying salt-affected soils. They used the standard deviation and correlation coefficient values of TM data to compute a statistical parameter called the optimum index factor (OIF), indicative of the variance of the data. Of the 20 possible 3-band combinations, the combination of 1, 3, and 5 was found to be the best in terms of information content. The validation of results revealed a mixed relationship between ranking obtained from OIF values and estimated accuracy.

Dwivedi and Sreenivas (1998) demonstrated the potential of image transformations such as principal-component analysis (PCA), ratioing, and image differencing to detect changes in extent and distribution of salt-affected soils, using Landsat MSS data for 1975 and 1992 to study the alluvial plains of Uttar Pradesh. Results indicated that the third principal component, image differencing and ratioing of the first two bands provided substantial information about behaviour of salt-affected soils over time in the two periods.

Metternicht and Zinck (1997) applied a synergistic approach to map salt-affected surfaces, combining digital image classification with field observation of soil-degradation features and laboratory determinations. Landsat TM bands1, 2, 4, 5, 6 and 7 were combined to obtain the highest separability between salt- and sodium-affected soils. Overall accuracy was 64 percent; for some soils 100 percent accuracy was obtained. The main reasons for low accuracy are:

WORK IN PAKISTAN

The SSP has long experience of interpreting aerial photographs for soil surveys. Salt-affected soils are identifiable by a patchy salt pattern (slightly saline) and areas with a more continuous surface cover of salt (highly saline). Salt-affected areas on aerial photographs show up as light-coloured areas. Dark-coloured areas can be identified as waterlogged or consisting of clay soils. Chouchri et al. (1978) used aerial photographs from 1953-54 and 1976 to compare differences in salt-affected and waterlogged lands before and after implementation of the SCARP-1 programme. They concluded that the waterlogged areas had decreased in extent but had often become saline. Large areas with salt-affected soils were still out of cultivation; only small patches of slightly saline soils were under cultivation.

WAPDA, in collaboration with the World Bank, carried out a study in the Khairpur Pilot Project Sindh to identify salinity by means of Landsat data using visual and digital interpretation (Farooq and Nur ud Din, 1980). Visual interpretation identified only highly saline areas; computer analysis identified moderately saline areas. Areas that were only slightly affected could not be identified because of their small size and patchy pattern. The research showed that multi-temporal images are a prerequisite because of seasonal variations in salinity and effects of vegetation cover. They found that the most valuable months for salinity surveys were February and March.

In 1984, WAPDA conducted a study on the applicability of Landsat imagery for monitoring soil-salinity trends in two areas in Punjab and Sindh. Black-and-white mosaics of Landsat MSS band 5, scale 1: 250 000 taken in March, April and December were visually interpreted and compared with 1:250 000 surface salinity maps published by WAPDA. Results were not promising, because it was largely impossible to identify WAPDA salinity categories (slight, moderate and strong) and their extent. For some small areas in Punjab it was possible to distinguish slightly saline areas from strong and moderate.

In 1988, Euroconsult studied an area near Dera Ghazi Khan, Punjab, using the Système pour l'Observation de la Terre (SPOT) satellite XS images from May and SPOT PAN from April to identify waterlogged and saline areas, which are reflected in 1and use. The images were first interpreted visually, but because results were unsatisfactory, computer compatible tapes were processed by methods including composition of three bands into false-colour images, image enhancement and linear stretching. Filtering was used instead of spectral-reflectance analysis to enhance texture differences and make it easier to differentiate sand dunes, saline areas and waterlogged areas. After preliminary interpretation and field surveys, the boundaries of the map units could be indicated.

The Space Upper Atmosphere Research Commission (SUPARCO) conducted research to distinguish saline areas in Punjab and Sindh, using Landsat MSS and then, because of better spatial resolution, SPOT images. Khan and Siddiqui (1987) studied three test sites and compared digital interpretation results with WAPDA surface-salinity maps. Visual interpretation of images - Landsat MSS, PAM, 1:250 000, bands 5 and 7 - was used to identify waterlogged and saline areas. Digital interpretation identified four classes: non-saline, slightly saline, moderately saline and highly saline. Maps prepared with RS techniques corresponded to the WAPDA surface-salinity maps for two of the three areas.

A major attempt to classify salinity in Pakistan with RS indices was by Tabet (1995 and 1999) and Vidal et al.(1998), conducted as part of an IWMI-Cemagref collaboration in the Chishtian district in southeastern Punjab. Vegetation and brightness indices derived from SPOT XS were used to classify salinity for vegetative and non-vegetative areas. The resulting classification allows identification of highly saline and non-saline areas, but areas with low to medium salinity levels are difficult to distinguish. Confusion about salinity classes results mainly from the fact that uneven crop growth may be due to salinity or agricultural practices.

CONCLUSION

Most applications of RS for irrigation management in Pakistan have been isolated studies, mainly to identify salinity-affected areas, in which visual interpretation gives rapid identification only of highly saline areas. Digital interpretation is necessary for more accurate identification of saline areas.

There are constraints to RS that need to be considered. Only surface features can be sensed, so subsurface information has to be obtained indirectly. The spatial resolution of satellite images limits them to detection of cropping patterns and monitoring of salinity on fields. Various factors cause spectral reflectance changes during the year.

RS information can be improved when it is integrated with other data, for which a GIS is an appropriate tool.

REFERENCES

Agbu P.A., Fehrenbacher, D.I. & Jansen, I.J. 1990. Soil-property relationships with SPOT satellite digital data in East Central Illinois. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 54: 807-812.

Ahmad, M.D. 1999. Estimating the interaction between soil moisture and groundwater using geo-information techniques. Enschede, Netherlands, International Institute for Aerospace Survey and Earth Sciences.

Azzali, S., Menenti, M., Meuwissen, I.J.M. & Visser, T.M.N. 1990. Mapping crop coefficients in an Argentinian irrigation scheme using remote sensing techniques. In M. Menenti, ed. Remote sensing in evaluation and management of irrigation, p. 79-101. Mendoza, Argentina.

Badji, M. & Mallants, D. 1991. Integrating GIS and process models: a new perspective for decision-support systems in irrigation and water management. In Proceedings of the second European conference on geographical information systems, p. 48-54. Brussels.

Bastiaanssen, W.G.M. 1998. Remote sensing in water resources management: the state of the art. Colombo, IWMI.

Bhatti, M.A. & Kijne, J.W. 1990. Irrigation allocation problems at tertiary level in Pakistan. IMN publ. No. 90/3c, London, ODI/IIMI.

Brena, J., Sanvicente, H. & Pulido, L. 1995. Salinity assessment in Mexico. In A. Vidal and J.A. Sagardoy, eds. Water Report No. 4: use of remote sensing techniques in irrigation and drainage, p. 173-178. Rome, FAO.

Burrough, P.A. 1986. Principles of geographical information systems for land-resources assessment. Soil and Resources Survey monograph No. 12. New York, OUP.

Casas, S. 1995. Salinity assessment based on combined use of remote sensing and GIS. In A. Vidal and J.A. Sagardoy, eds. Water Report No. 4: use of remote sensing techniques in irrigation and drainage, p. 185-197. Rome, FAO.

Chaturvedi, L., Carver, K.R., Harlan, J.C., Hancock, G.D., Small, F.V. & Dalstead, K.J. 1983. Multispectral remote sensing of saline seeps. IEEE Transactions on geoscience and remote sensing, 21(3): 239-250.

Choudhri, M.B., Mian, M.A. & Rafiq, M. 1978. The nature and magnitude of salinity and drainage problems in relation to agricultural development in Pakistan. Pakistan Soils Bulletin, 8. Lahore, Pakistan.

Cialella, A.T., Dubayah, R., Lawrence, W. & Levine, E. 1997. Predicting soil-drainage class using remotely sensed and digital elevation data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 63(2): 171-178.

Curran, P.J. 1985. Principles of remote sensing. Harlow, UK, Longman Group Ltd.

Dwivedi, R.S. & Rao, B.R.M. 1992. The selection of the best possible Landsat TM band combination for delineating salt-affected soils. Int. J. R.S., 13(11), 2 051-2 058.

Dwivedi, R.S. 1996. Monitoring of salt-affected soils of the Indo-Gangetic alluvial plains using principal component analysis. Int. J. R.S., 17(10): 1 907-1 914.

Dwivedi, R.S. & Sreenivas, K. 1998. Image transforms as a tool for the study of soil salinity and alkalinity dynamics. Int. J. R.S., 19(4), 605-619.

Epema, G.F. 1990. Effects of moisture content on spectral reflectance in a playa area in southern Tunisia. In Proceedings of the international symposium on remote sensing for water resources, p. 1 301-1 308. Enschede, Netherlands.

ESRI. 1990. 4D program summaries. PC ARC/INFO 3. Redlands, USA.

Euroconsult. 1988. Zoutkartering met behulp van SPOT-beelden in Punjab, Pakistan. Report No. 88-3. Arnhem, The Netherlands, BCR-S. In Dutch.

Everitt, J.H., Escobar, D.E., Gerbermann, A.H. & Alaniz, M.A. 1988. Detecting saline soils with video imagery. Photogrammetric Eng. and R.S., 54 (1): 283-287.

Farooq, M. & Nur Ud Din. 1980. Application of multitemporal Landsat data in the identification of salinity in the Khairpur pilot project, Pakistan. In Proceedings of the national seminar on application of remote sensing techniques in water resources development and management, pp. 74-31. Lahore, Pakistan.

Goossens, R.E.A., El Badawi, M., Ghabour, T.K. & de Dapper, M. 1993. A simulation model to monitor the soil salinity in irrigated arable based upon remote sensing and GIS. EARSeL Advances in Remote Sensing, 2(3): 165-171.

Goossens, E.M.C., Goossens, R.E.A., Ghabour, T.K. & Gad, A.G. 1993. Detailed assessment of degradation processes in the agricultural land of a newly reclaimed area in Egypt, using multitemporal high resolution satellite data. EARSeL Advances in Remote Sensing, 2(3): 91-101.

Hardisk, M.A., Klemas, V. & Daiber, F.C. 1983. Remote sensing saltmarsh biomass and stress detection. Advances in Space Research, 2: 219-229.

Hilwig, F.W. 1980. Visual interpretation of multi-temporal Landsat data for inventories of natural resources, a north Indian case study. ITC Journal 1980-2, 297-327. Enschede, Netherlands.

Johnstone, R.M. & Barson, M.M. 1990. An assessment of the use of remote sensing techniques in land degradation studies. Bulletin 5. Canberra, Australian Department of Primary Industries and Energy. 64 pp.

Joshi, M.D. & Sahai, B. 1993. Mapping of salt-affected land in Saurashtra coast using Landsat satellite data. Int. J. R.S., 14(10): 1 919-1 929.

Kauth, R.J. & Thomas, G.S. 1976. The tasseled cap: a graphic description of spectral-temporal development of agricultural crops as seen by Landsat. In Symposium on machine processing of remotely sensed data, 41-5 1. New York, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.

Khan, G.M. & Siddiqui, Z.A. 1987. Study of waterlogging and salinity in Larkana, Khairpur and Gujranwala using remotely sensed data. Karachi, Remote Sensing Applications Division, SUPARCO.

Khan, G.S. 1993. Characterization and genesis of saline-sodic soils in the Indus plains of Pakistan. Ph.D. thesis. Faisalabad, Pakistan, University of Agriculture.

Maher, M.A.A. 1990. The use of remote sensing techniques in combination with a geographic information system for soil studies with emphasis on quantification of salinity and alkalinity in the northern part of the Nile delta. MSc thesis. Enschede, Netherlands, ITC.

Makin, I.W. 1986. Applications of remotely sensed, multi-spectral data in monitoring saline soils. Technical note No. 19. Amritsar, India, IPRI.

Meijerink, A.M.J., Valenzuela, C.R. & Stewart, A. 1988. ILWIS: the integrated land and watershed management information system. ITC publ. No. 7. Enschede, Netherlands, International Institute for Aerospace and Earth Sciences. 115 pp.

Menenti, M. 1990. Sensing local sensitivities: the role of remote sensing in irrigation management and evaluation. Land and Water International 66, 10-12.

Menenti, M., Lorkeers, A. & Vissers, M. 1986. An application of thematic mapper data in Tunisia. ITC Journal, 1: 35-42.

Menenti, M., Azzali, S., Collado, D.A. & Leguizamon, S. 1986. Multitemporal analysis of Landsat MSS and TM data to map crops in the Po valley (Italy) and in Mendoza (Argentina). In M.C.J. Damen, G. Sicco Smit & H. T. Verstappen, eds. Remote sensing for resources development and environmental management, p. 293-299. Rotterdam, Netherlands, Balkema.

Metternicht, G. & Zinck, J.A. 1997. Spatial discrimination of salt and sodium-affected soil surfaces. Int. J. R.S., 18 (12): 2 571-2 586.

Mirabile, C., Hudson, R., Ibanez, G. & Masotta, H. 1995. Detection, delimitation, and dynamic control of saline areas in irrigated soils through the use of Landsat TM satellite images. In A. Vidal & J.A. Sagardoy, eds. Water report 4: use of remote sensing techniques in irrigation and drainage, p. 179-184. Rome, FAO.

Morabito, J., Ibanez, G., Massota, H., Hudson, R. & Mirabile, C. 1990. The use of satellite images for saline soils detection and delimitation. In M. Menenti ed. Remote sensing in evaluation and management of irrigation. Mendoza, Argentina.

Mougenot, B., Pouget, M. & Epema, G.F. 1993. Remote sensing of salt affected soils. R.S. Reviews, 7: 241-259.

Mulders, M.A. 1987. Remote sensing in soil science. Developments in Soil Science 15. Amsterdam, Elsevier.

Mulders, M.A. & Epema, G.F. 1986. The thematic mapper: a new tool for soil mapping in arid areas. ITC Journal, 1: 24-29.

NEEXPRI. 1991. Een classification van ruimtelijke informatie system. Utrecht, Netherlands, RU. In Dutch.

Rao, B.R., Dwivedi, R.S., Venkataratnam, L., Ravishankar, T., Thammappa, S.S., Bhargava, G.P. & Singh, A.N. 1991. Mapping the magnitude of sodicity in part of the Indo-Gangetic plains of Uttar Pradesh, northern India using Landsat data. Int. J. R.S. 12: 419-425.

Saha, S.K., Kudrat, M. & Bhan, S.K. 1990. Digital processing of Landsat TM data for wasteland mapping in parts of Aligarh district, Uttar Pradesh, India. Int. J. R.S., 11: 485-492.

Sharma, R.C. & Bhargava, G.P. I988. Landsat imagery for mapping saline soils and wet lands in north-west India. Int. J. R.S., 9: 39-44.

Shrestha, D.P. 1991. Lecture notes on digital image processing of remote sensing data. Enschede, Netherlands, ITC.

Shrestha, D.P. 1988. Remote sensing techniques for land cover and land use analyses. In Proceedings of the 14th UN/FAO international training course on remote sensing applications to land resources. Rome, FAO.

Siderius, W. 1991. The use of remote sensing for irrigation management with emphasis on IIMI research concerning salinity, waterlogging and cropping patterns. Mission Report. Enschede, Netherlands, International Institute for Aerospace Survey and Earth Sciences. 97 pp.

Singh, R.P. & Srivastav, S.K. 1990. Mapping waterlogged and salt affected soils using microwave radiometers. Int. J. R.S., 11: 1 879-1 887.

Singh, A.N. & Dwivedi, R.S. 1989. Delineation of salt-affected soils through digital analysis of Landsat MSS data. Int. J. R.S., 10: 83-92.

Steven, M.D., Malthus, T.J., Jaggard, F.M. & Andrieu, B. 1992. Monitoring responses of vegetation to stress. In A.P. Cracknell & R.A. Vaughan, eds. Remote sensing from research to operation: proceedings of the 18th annual conference of the Remote Sensing Society, p. 369-377. Nottingham, U.K., Remote Sensing Society.

SUPARCO. 1990. Space research in Pakistan 1990. National report to the XXVIII COSPAR meeting. Karachi.

Szabolcs, I. 1979. Review of research on salt-affected soils. Paris, UNESCO.

Tabet, D. 1999. Intérêt d'une approche spatiale pour suivi de la salinité des sols dans les systèmes irrigués: cas de la subdivision de Chistian dans le Punjab, Pakistan. Ph.D. Thesis. Montpellier, France, Ecole Nationale du Génie rural, des Eaux et Forêts.

Tabet, D. 1995. Le suivi de la salinité dans les périmètres irrigués par télédétection et systèmes d'information géographique: application au périmèter de Fordwah, Pakistan. Montpellier, France, DEA National d'Hydrologie. 174 pp.

Timmerman, K.B. 1989. Standardization of the albedo. Internal Note 26. Wageningen, Netherlands, DLO-Winand Staring Centre. 29 pp.

Valenzuela, C.R. 1991. Introduction to geographic information systems. Enschede, Netherlands, ITC.

Van der Velde, E.J. 1990. Performance assessment in a large irrigation system in Pakistan: opportunities for improvement at the distributary level. In Proceedings of the FAO Regional Workshop on Improved Irrigation Systems Performance for Sustainable Agriculture, Bangkok. Rome, FAO.

Venkataratnam, L. 1983. Monitoring of soil salinity in the Indo-Gangetic plain of NW India using multidate Landsat data. In Proceedings of the 17th international symposium on remote sensing of the environment, Vol. 1, p. 369-377. Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA, Environmental Research Institute of Michigan.

Verma, K.S., Saxena, R.K., Barthwal, A.K. & Deshmukh, S.N. 1994. Remote-sensing technique for mapping salt affected soils. Int. J. R.S., 15(9), 1 901-1 914.

Vincent, B., Frejefond, E., Vidal, A. & Baqri, A. 1995. Drainage performance assessment using remote sensing in the Gharb plain, Morocco. In A. Vidal & J.A. Sagardoy, eds. Water report No. 4: use of remote sensing techniques in irrigation and drainage, p. 155-164. Rome, FAO.

Vidal, A., Maure, P., Durand, H. & Strosser, P. 1996. Remote sensing applied to irrigation system management: example of Pakistan. In EURISY colloquium: satellite observation for sustainable development in the Mediterranean area, p. 132-142. Paris, Promotion of Education and Information Activities for the Advancement of Space Technology and its Application in Europe.

Vidal, V., Tabet, D., Ahmad., M.D., Asif, S., Zimmer, D. & Strosser, P. 1998. Salinity assessment in irrigation systems using remote sensing and geographical information systems - application to Chistian subdivison, Pakistan. Report R-47. Lahore, Pakistan, IIMI.

Vincent, B., Vidal, A., Tabbet, D., Baqri, A. & Kuper, M. 1996. Use of satellite remote sensing for the assessment of waterlogging or salinity as an indication of the performance of drained systems. In B. Vincent, ed. Evaluation of performance of subsurface drainage systems: 16th congress on irrigation and drainage, Cairo, p. 203-216. New Delhi, ICID.

Visser, T.N.M. 1990. Use of satellite data and geographic information system in the appraisal of irrigation performance. In M. Menenti, ed. Remote sensing in evaluation and management of irrigation, p. 147-165. Mendoza, Argentina.

WAPDA. 1981. Atlas soil salinity survey of irrigated areas in the Indus basin, 41 million acres. Publ. No. 274, 5 vols. Lahore, Pakistan.

WAPDA. 1984. Applicability of Landsat imagery for monitoring soil salinity trends. Publ. 529. Lahore, Pakistan, Directorate of Reclamation and Investigation Organization.

Wiegand, C.L., Everitt, J.H. & Richardson, A.J. 1992. Comparison of multispectral video and SPOT/HRV observations for cotton affected by soil salinity. Int. J. R.S., 13(8): 1 511-1 525.

Zevenbergen, A.W. 1990. Integrating remote sensing and conventional information. Land and Water International, 56: 7-9.

Zuluaga, J.M. 1990. Remote sensing applications in irrigation management in Mendoza, Argentina. In M. Menenti, ed. Remote sensing in evaluation and management of irrigation, p. 37-58. Mendoza, Argentina, Instituto Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnic.


Previous Page Top of Page Next Page