Previous PageTop Of PageNext Page

References

Forests and climate change

Besnéhard, J., 1998. La forêt, puits de carbone ? Exemple de l'internalisation d'un bien ou service non marchand. Mémoire de DEA. ENGREF, Nancy, France.

Cox, P.M., Betts, R.A., Jones, C., Spall, A., Totterdell, I., 2000. Acceleration of global warming due to carbon-cycles feedbacks in a coupled climate model. Nature, 408.

Falkowski, P., Scholes, R.J. et al. (lead authors) 2000. The Global Carbon Cycle: A Test of Our Knowledge of Earth as a System, Science, 290.

Edinburgh Centre for Carbon Management (http://www.eccm.uk.com/climate.htm)

EUROFOR, 1996. L'Europe et la Forêt. Parlement Européen. Tomes I et II.

Girard, P., Bertrand, A., 2000. Rôle et place de la biomasse énergie en PED pour lutter contre la pauvreté et améliorer l'environnement. Note pour le G8. CIRAD-Forêt.

International Energy Administration, 1999. World Carbon Dioxide Emissions from the Consumption and Flaring of Fossil Fuels. http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/iea/carbon.html

Intergovernmental Panel on climate change, 1997. Guidelines for National GHG Inventories. [J.T. Houghton, L.G. Meira Filho, B. Lim, K. Treanton, I. Mamaty, Y. Bonduki, D.J. Griggs and B.A. Callender (eds)] IPCC, Meteorological Office, Bracknell, Great Britain.

Intergovernmental Panel on climate change, 2000. Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry - Special report. [R.T. Watson, I. R. Noble, B. Bolin, N.H. Ravindranath, D.J. Verardo, D.J. Dokken (eds)]. Intergovernmental Panel on climate change, Meteorological Office, Bracknell, United Kingdom. 377 pp.

Intergovernmental Panel on climate change, 2001. Third Assessment Report - climate change 2001. climate change 2001: The Scientific Basis Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on climate change (IPCC) J. T. Houghton, Y. Ding, D.J. Griggs, M. Noguer, P. J. van der Linden and D. Xiaosu (Eds.). Cambridge University Press, UK. pp 944

IPCC web site: www.ipcc.ch

Lal, R., 1999. World soils and the greenhouse effect, IGBP Global Change NewsLetter, March, 37.

Locatelli, B., 1996. Forêts tropicales et Cycle du Carbone. CIRAD. 91 p.

Mégevand, C., 1998. Les programs forestiers. Un moyen de lutte efficace contre le réchauffement global. Mémoire INA - PG, Paris.

Pedersen, T., 2000. climate change Fore and Aft : Where on Earth are We Going. IGBP Newsletter 44.

Scholes, B., 1999. Will the terrestrial carbon sink saturate soon ? IGBP Global Change NewsLetter, March, 37.

Tipper, R., Forestry and the Clean Development Mechanism, Edinburgh Centre for Carbon Management, 12th May 2000

Valentini, R., Dolman, H., Ciais, P., Schulze, D., Freibauer, A., Schimel, D., Heimann, M., 2000. Accounting for Carbon Sinks in the Biosphere - European Perspective. CARBOEUROPE Cluster. EU DG Research, Bruxelles.

The international negotiations on climate change

Loisel, C., 2001. Forêt et changement climatique. L'essentiel en 15 pages. Office National des Forêts.

French Interministerial Task-Force on climate change (Mission interministérielle pour l'effet de serre) web site: http://www.effet-de-serre.gouv.fr/

United Nations Framework Convention on climate change, 1992.

UNFCCC, 1997. Kyoto Protocol.

UNFCCC, 2001. Report of the Conference of the Parties on its seventh session, held at Marrakech from 29 October to 10 November 2001. FCCC/CP/2001/13. Part 2 : actions taken by the Conference of the Parties.

UNFCCC, 2002. A guide to the climate change convention process. Preliminary 2nd edition. Issued for informational purposes only. climate change Secretariat. Bonn.

UNFCCC web site: http://unfccc.int

Funds operated by the GEF

Cornut, P., 1998. Analyse et complémentarités entre le MDP et le FEM : une première mise en perspective. Rapport pour le FFEM.

de Gouvello, Ch., 2001. Le MDP : essai d'intégration de la référence positive au développement. CIRED, work document.

FFEM web site: www.ffem.net

GEF, 1996. Operational Strategy of the Global Environment Facility.

GEF web site: http://www.gefweb.org/

Report of the GEF sponsored roundtable on forests. 11th March 2002, New York. Chairman's summary (Jeff Sayer NY).

Mechanism to develop North South investments

Baumert, K.A., Kete, N., (with) Figueres C., 2000. Designing the Clean Development Mechanism to Meet the Needs of a Broad range of Interests. Climate Notes, World Resources Institute, Washington D.C.

Baumert, K.A., 1999. The Clean Development Mechanism: understanding additionality. In: Promoting Development while Limiting Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Trends and Baselines. United Nations Development Program (UNDP) and World Resources Institute, United Nations Publications

Blanco, J.T., Forner, C., 2000. Expiring CERs. A proposal to addressing the permanence issue for LUCF projects in the CDM. Informal paper.

Cisse, M. K., 2000. climate change in West Africa: main concerns and priorities relating to the implementation of UNFCCC and the Kyoto Protocol. CAN Summit, 23-24 March 2000. Washington. http://www.enda.sn/energie/cc/priorities.htm

Chomitz, K., 1998. Baselines for Greenhouse Gas Reductions - Problems, Precedents, Solutions, Carbon Offsets Team, World Bank Research Group, Washington D.C.

Chomitz, K., Brenes, E., and Constantino, L., 1999. Financing environmental services: The Costa Rican Experience and its implications. The Science of the Total Environment, 240, 157-169

Ciais, Ph., 2000. Compliance and Supplementarity in the Kyoto Protocol. RFF/CIRAD Workshop, June 2000.

CIFOR website: http://www.cifor.org

Cornut, P., 1999 et 2000. Mécanisme de développement propre. Une série de 30 fiches réalisées pour le Ministère de l'aménagement du territoire et de l'environnement. http://atlas.conseil.free.fr/cadres.html.

Cornut, P., 1998. Analyse et complémentarités entre le MDP et le FEM : une première mise en perspective. Rapport pour le FFEM.

Dixon, R. K. (ed.), 1999. The U.N. Framework Convention on climate change. Activities Implemented Jointly (AIJ) Pilot : Experiences and Lessons learned. Kluwer Academic Publishers. Netherlands. 422p.

Eraker, H., 2000. "CO2lonialism-Norwegian Tree Plantations, Carbon Credits and Land Conflicts in Uganda". NorWatch.

de Gouvello, Ch., 2001. Le MDP : essai d'intégration de la référence positive au développement. CIRED, work document.

Heister, J., 1999. World Bank Research on Methodology for AIJ/JI/CDM Projects - Status Report. Carbon Offsets Team, World Bank, Washington, DC, USA.

International emissions trading association (IETA) Discussion Paper 02-02 "LULUCF Projects in the CDM"Discussion Paper No. 02-02. Accounting regimes and proposals for simplified rules and modalities

Kerr, S., Leining, C., 2000. Permanence of LULUCF CERS in the Clean Development Mechanism. Center for Clean Air Policy (CCAP).

Kete, N., Bhandari, R., Baumert, K., 2001. Should Development Aid Be Used to Finance the Clean Development Mechanism? Climate Notes. World Resources Institute, Washington DC

Lecocq, F., Chomitz, K., 2001. Optimal use of carbon sequestration in a global mitigation strategy: is there a wooden bridge to a clean future ? World Bank, Development Economic Research Group.

Marland, G., Schlamadinger, B., 1997. Forests for carbon sequestration or fossil fuel substitution? A sensitivity analysis. Biomass and bioenergy Vol 13, No. 6: 389-397.

Matsuo, N., 1999. Baseline as the Critical Issue of CDM - Possible Pathway to Standardization. GISPRI - IGES.

Michaelowa, A., 1998. Joint Implementation - the baseline issue. Global Environmental Change, vol.8, n°1, Pergamon. http://perso.easynet.fr/~michaelo/ji.htm

Michaelowa, A. et Dutschke, M., 1998. Joint Implementation as Development Policy- The Case of Costa Rica.

Moura Costa, P., Wilson, C., 1999. An equivalence factor between CO2 avoided emissions and sequestration - description and applications in forestry. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change.

The Nature Conservancy, Technical Operating Protocols for Carbon Monitoring, Leakage Monitoring, Accounting and Reporting, and Verification and Supervision http://nature.org/

Peugeot website: http://www.peugeotavenue.com

Selrod, R., 2000. Evaluation Report of the Norway-World Bank AIJ Program : Lessons Learned from the Pilot Phase under the UNFCCC. Environment Department, The World Bank, Washington, DC, USA.

Sokona, Y., Humphreys, S. et Thomas, J.-P., 1999. The Clean Development Mechanism : what prospects for Africa ? Environnement et développement du Tiers Monde (ENDA-TM), Dakar, Sénégal, 25pp. http://www.enda.sn

Sokona, Y., Nanasta, D., 2000. The Clean Development Mechanism : an African Delusion ? Change, n°54, October-November 2000, p.8-11. http://www.enda.sn/energie/cc/cdm-afric.htm

Stave, J., 2000. Carbon Upsets-Norwegian Carbon Plantations in Tanzania. NorWatch.

UNFCCC web site on AIJ projects: http://maindb.unfccc.int/aij

Valentini, R., Dolman, H., Ciais, P., Schulze, D., Freibauer, A., Schimel, D., Heimann, M., 2000. Accounting for Carbon Sinks in the Biosphere - European Perspective. CARBOEUROPE Cluster. EU DG Research, Bruxelles.

World Bank Prototype Carbon Fund: http://www.prototypecarbonfund.org

World Bank CDM Assist: http://www.worldbank.org/afr/cdm/

African forestry

Barreto P., Amaral P., Vidal E., Uhl C., 1998. Costs and benefits of forest management for timber production in eastern Amazonia. Forest Ecology and Management 108: p 9-26.

Bertault, J.-G., Kadir, K. (eds), 1998. Silvicultural research in a lowland mixed dipterocarp forest of East Kalimantan. The contribution of STREK project. CIRAD-Forêt, Montpellier, France, 250 p.

Contreras-Hermosilla, A., 2000. The Underlying Causes of Forest decline. Occasional Paper n°30, CIFOR.

Energy Information Administration (USA). www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/cabs/chapter7.html

Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations, 1999. World Forests situation. http://www.fao.org, 156 p.

Geller, S., 2000. " Forestry sector Interventions ". United Nations Development Program, Sustainable Energy and Environment Division (SEED), Program on Forests.

Girard, Ph., 1997. Utilisation des déchets des industries du bois pour le séchage et la cogénération d'électricité  AFD - CIRAD-Forêt.

Girard, P. et Bertrand, A., 2000. Rôle et place de la biomasse énergie en PED pour lutter contre la pauvreté et améliorer l'environnement. Note pour le G8. CIRAD-Forêt.

Griffon, M. et Mallet, B., 1999. En quoi l'agroforesterie peut-elle contribuer à la révolution doublement verte ? Bois et Forêts des Tropiques 260 : p 41-51.

Kaimowitz, D., Angelsen, A., 1998. Economic Models of Tropical Deforestation : A review. CIFOR, Indonesia.

Karsenty, A., 1999. Economic instruments for tropical forests. The Congo Basin Case. Montpellier, CIRAD. London, Lied. CIFOR, 2000. 12p.

Nginguiri, J.-C., 1999. Les approches participatives dans la gestion des écosystèmes d'Afrique Centrale. CIFOR Occasional Paper, no. 23

Palm, C.A., P.L. Woomer, J. Alegre, L. Aravelo, C. Castilla, D.G. Cordero, B. Feigl, K. Hariah, J. Kotto-Same, A. Mendes, A. Moukam, D. Murdiyarso, R. Njomgamg, W.J. Parton, A . Ricse, V. Rodrigues, S.M. Sitompul, et N. Van Noordwijk, 2000: Carbon Sequestration and Trace Gaz Emissions in Slash and Burn and Alternative Land-Use in the Humid Tropics. ASB climate change Working Group Report. Final Report, Phase II. International Center for Agroforestry, Nairobi, Kenya, 37 pp.

United Nations Convention on biological diversity, 1992.

United Nations Convention on desertification, 1992.

UNDP, UNEP, WB, WRI. World Resources 2000-2001

World Bank, 2000. World development report.

World Bank, 2000. World development indicators

Previous PageTop Of PageNext Page