Previous Page Table of Contents


PART IV
ANNEXES

Annex 1
LIST OF PARTICIPANTS

CountryName/Address
ASEAN countries
INDONESIA1.Mr. Darjamuni
  Staff, Marine Fisheries Production
  Jakarta Fisheries Service
  Dinas Perikanan DKI Jakarta
  J1. Medan Merdeka Selatan No. 8–9
  Blok G Lantai 21, Jakarta
 2.Mr. Ketut Kiteartika
  Staff, Marine Resources Section
  Dinas Perikanan
  J1. Patimura 77, Dan Pasar
MALAYSIA1.Mr. Salehan bin Lamin
  Fisheries Officer
  Fisheries Division
  Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries
  Contact Address: Director of Fisheries
  Labuan, Malaysia
  Tel. No. 412077 • 415881
  Telex No. MA 85035
 2.Mr. Ramli Saad
  Fisheries Officer
  Fisheries Division
  
Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries
  Contact Address: Fisheries Research Institute
  Glugor, Penang, Malaysia
  Tel. No. 881777
 3.Mr. Arman Shah Ambo Dalli
  Fisheries Assistant (Lower Grade)
  Fisheries Department Sabah
  Contact Address: Fisheries Department, P.O. Box 133
  Semporna, Sabah, Malaysia
PHILIPPINES1.Ms. Rizalina M. Legasto
  Supervising Fishery Extension Specialist II
  Fisheries Extension Division
  Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources
  Arcadia Bldg., 860 Quezon Avenue
  Quezon City, Metro Manila
 2.Ms. Leonora D. Rivera
  Fishery Technician
  Seafarming Section, Fish Propagation Division
  Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources
  Arcadia Bldg., 860 Quezon Avenue
  Quezon City, Metro Manila
PHILIPPINES3.Ms. Daisy Ladra
  Jr. Fishery Biologist
  Fisheries Research Division
  Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources
  Arcadia Bldg., 860 Quezon Avenue
  Quezon City, Metro Manila
 4.Mr. Virgilio Villena
  Jr. Fishery Biologist
  Lucap Fisheries Station
  Lucap, Alaminos, Pangasinan
 5.Mr. Gregorio Clave
  Seaweed Farmer
  Anda, Pangasinan
THAILAND1.Mr. Luechai Daroonchoo
  Fisheries Biologist
  Chanthaburi Brackishwater Fisheries Station
  Muang, Chanthaburi, Thailand 22000
  Contact Address: Department of Fisheries
  Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives
  Rajadamnern Avenue, Bangkok
  Thailand
 2.Mr. Suchat Tachanaravong
  Fishery Biologist/Seaweed Team Leader
  National Institute of Coastal Aquaculture
  Songkhla, Thailand
  Tel. No. 311895
  Contact Address: Department of Fisheries
  Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives
  Rajadamnern Avenue, Bangkok
  Thailand
Non-ASEAN countries
PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA1.Mr. Wang Feijiu
 2.Mr. Cai Zulin
 3.Mr. Xu Zhimo
  Contact Address: Mr. Tong Jingwen, Deputy Chief
  Division of Foreign Economic and Techniques
  Bureau of Aquatic Products
  Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Husbandry and Fisheries
  31 Min Feng Lane, Xidan
  Beijing, People's Republic of China
REPUBLIC OF KOREA1.Mr. June Chang-Su
 2.Mr. Jung Jin-Tae
  Contact Address: Dr. Byung Ha Park, Director
  Department of Aquaculture
  Fisheries Research and Development Agency
  16, 2-GA, Namhang-Dong
  Youngdo-Gu, Pusan
  Republic of Korea
INDIA1.Dr. V.S.K. Chennubhotla
  Contact Address: Mr. S.S. Ahluwalia, Director, (IC)
  Ministry of Agriculture
  Krishi Bhavan, New Delhi
  India

Annex 2
LIST OF LECTURE TOPICS AND CORRESPONDING LECTURERS,
PRACTICAL WORKS, FIELD VISITS AND DETAILS
OF THE SCHEDULE OF ACTIVITIES

A.LECTURE TOPICSLECTURERS
 1.Coastal Resources of Asia-Pacific: Environmental AspectsDr. Edgardo D. Gomez
 2.Status of the Seaweed Production and Utilization in Asia and Western Pacific RegionDr. Gavino C. Trono, Jr.
 3.Influence of Environmental Factors on the Structure and Distribution of Seaweed CommunitiesDr. Miguel D. Fortes
 4.Introduction to Seaweeds: Their Characteristics and Economic ImportanceDr. Rhodora A. Corrales
 5.How to Identify SeaweedsDr. Romeo Modelo
 6.Inventory and Assessment of Economically Important Seaweed StocksDr. Miguel D. Fortes
 7.The Taxonomy of Commercially Important Seaweeds in Tropical Asia/Western PacificDr. Gavino C. Trono, Jr. and Dr. Romeo Modelo
 8.Production of Economically Important Seaweeds through Culture and Harvesting of Natural StocksDr. Gavino C. Trono, Jr.
 10.Post-Harvest Practices/Processing and Utilization of Seaweed ProductsMr. Maximo Ricohermoso
 10.Seaweed Diseases and Other Problems in Seaweed CultureDr. Gavino C. Trono, Jr.
 11.Potential for Polyculture of Seaweeds with Milkfish/CrustaceansDr. Edgardo D. Gomez
 12.Eucheuma (Seaweed) IndustryMr. Maximo Ricohermoso
 13.Field and Laboratory Techniques in the Collection, Preservation of Marine Benthic Algae for Herbarium and for IdentificationDr. Romeo Modelo
B.PRACTICAL WORKS
 1.Introduction to the Representatives of the our Division of SeaweedsDr. Rhodora A. Corrales
 2.Identification of SeaweedsDr. Romeo Modelo
 3.Field and Laboratory Techniques in the Collection, Preservation and Curation of SeaweedsDr. Romeo Modelo
 4.Demonstration on Field Culture of Eucheuma
 5.Demonstration on Pond Culture of Caulerpa
 6.Demonstration on Field Culture of Gracilaria
 7.Assessment of Natural Stocks of Seaweeds
C. FIELD VISIT/TRIPS TO PRODUCTION SITES ANDPROCESSING PLANTS
 1.Visit to Processing Plants in Cebu/Mandaue

Schedule of Activities

Date/Day8:00–9:00
A.M.
9:00–10:00
A.M.
10:00–10:30
A.M.
10:30–12:00
N.N.
1:30–3:00
P.M.
3:00–3:30
P.M.
3:30–5:00
P.M.
2 May (Mon)RegistrationOpening CeremoniesBreakCourse OrientationLecture 1BreakLecture 2
3 May (Tue)Lecture 3BreakLecture 4Practicum 1Breakcontinuation
4 May (Wed)Lecture 3BreakLecture 5Practicum 2BreakPracticum 2
(cont'd.)
5 May (Thu)Lecture 6BreakLecture 6
(cont'd)
Lecture 7BreakLecture 7
(cont'd.)
6 May (Fri)Lecture 7BreakLecture 8Lecture 8BreakLecture 8
(cont'd.)
7 May (Sat)Lecture 10BreakLecture 11Lecture 13BreakLecture 13
(cont'd.)
8 May (Sun)Leave for Cebu     
9 May (Mon) Field visit to Mactan, Cebu  Practicum 5 
10 May (Tue)Leave for BoholField visit to Bohol Practicum 4 
11 May (Wed) -do-    
12 May (Thu) Field visit to Cebu/Mandaue    
     Lectures 12 and 9
13 May (Fri)  Field visit to Cebu/Mandaue   
14 May (Sat)-do-Leave for Cebu for Manila
15 May (Sun)Field trip to Bolinao, Pangasinan   
16 May (Mon)Practicum 6   
17 May (Tue)and   
18 May (Wed)Practicum 7   
19 May (Thu)Back to Manila     
20 May (Fri)Assessment/Evaluation of Training and Closing Ceremony   
21 May (Sat)Depart for Home   

Annex 3
LIST OF TRAINING STAFF

Corrales, Rhodora, A., Ph.D. Assistant Professor, Marine Science Institute, College of Science, University of the Philippines, Diliman, Quezon City

Fortes, Miguel D., Ph.D. Associate Professor, Marine Science Institute, College of Science, University of the Philippines, Diliman, Quezon City

Gomez, Edgardo D., Ph.D. Professor and Director, Marine Science Institute, College of Science, University of the Philippines, Diliman, Quezon City

Modelo, Romeo, Ph.D. Associate Professor, College of Arts and Sciences, De La Salle University, Taft Avenue, Manila

Trono, Gavino C. Jr.,1 Ph.D. Professor, Marine Science Institute, College of Science, University of the Philippines, Diliman, Quezon City

Ricohermoso, Maximo, President, Seaweed Industry Association of the Philippines, Mandaue City, Cebu

1 Served as Training Director of the Course

Annex 4
REMARKS OF DR. EDGARDO D. GOMEZ
PROFESSOR AND DIRECTOR MARINE SCIENCE INSTITUTE, COLLEGE OF SCIENCE
UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES
TRAINING COURSE ON SEAWEED FARMING
2–21 MAY 1988

Mr. Tengku Ubaidillah,
Mr. Justo R. Montemayor,
Mrs. Medina N. Delmendo,

Project Coordinator,
Fellow Guests and Participants:

We are gathered here this morning to open the Regional Training Course on Seaweed Farming. This occasion brings us together to recognize the fact that more and more people are aware of the importance of seaweeds and more and more agencies have been addressing this particular problem to maximize the spread of knowledge on seaweeds. We are now beyond the stage of collecting wild seaweeds and we are exerting efforts in facing and searching for new species that might be produced in this country and many countries are enjoined in this effort. In Asia seaweeds transplantation has the greatest potential and biotypes where seaweeds may be found are abundant. We are gathered here today to open this training course so that a number of participants from the ASEAN and non-ASEAN countries can learn the different methods of seaweed culture, exchange ideas, share problems and share time and effort to solve these problems so that later on in going back home to be able to train others on the culture of different types of seaweeds.

The Marine Science Institute is about to put all systems to this important exercise. I would like to be apologetic simply because we are not in the very fast stage of growth. At the moment we cannot offer you the best facilities. We are making available to you the facilities that we presently have to make your training worthwhile and you may see our laboratory which is not only devoted to marine seaweeds. We are at the present time constructing the headquarters and hope some of you will have the chance to work and see our laboratory. I understand you are going to our Marine Laboratory in Pangasinan.

We have been constructing the laboratory two years ago with a total expense of about 2 million. Now, the costs have been doubled and we have just known that the Secretary of Budget has approved our funding to complete our Complex consisting of the laboratory, administration building, dormitory and housing of our staff. When you go to Pangasinan, you will see what is happening there. There are many projects that we are undertaking. I hope you will have a chance to see the location.

Let me just pass on these two or three ideas that pertains to seaweed since you will be lectured in the class. I would like to say that in your effort to develop this marine resource in your respective country, let me point out that effort can only be obtained if there is a sincere dedication on the participant to obtain results to come up. Too often we make some effort to make the project see through. In our project there is that interest of the staff. I have noticed that this has been successful since the staff is willing to make some extra effort, some sacrifice. It is not just an eight to five o'clock hour work. It is difficult to work earlier than eight o'clock in the morning and finish beyond five o'clock in the afternoon and work on Saturdays. But perhaps if you want to see results, we could try to develop a work ethic that will meet the challenge. The second point is the present resource development in the environment. We will talk on this later in the day. In our effort to develop this resource, we forget the conservation of our environment. Too often we are trying to develop our production without due regard to environment. If we are to make our marine resources productive, we should take into consideration the impact of the various habitats of environment.

I would like to welcome all of you in this particular training and hope you will find this course very profitable when you go back to your respective country.

Annex 5
ADDRESS OF MR. TENGKU UBAIDILLAH
FAO REPRESENTATIVE MANILA
TRAINING COURSE ON SEAWEED FARMING
2–21 MAY 1988

Sponsored by the ASEAN/UNDP/FAO Regional Small-Scale Coastal Fisheries Development Project
and
Seafarming Development and Demonstration Project

On behalf of FAO I would like to welcome you all to the Philippines. It is always a pleasure to me to receive and to join fellow workers in Fisheries, because I have spent almost 30 years of my life in the service of Fisheries. Although I have a broadened scope of work now, I am still serving fisheries as one of my areas of concern. Small-scale fishermen is still the target group we are directing our rural development efforts.

General Information

Seaweed farming has a fairly recent development in Asia except that of Porphyra known as Nori to the Japanese which was reported to have started in 1596 in Hiroshima Bay. The discovery that the pole and net devices installed to catch fish were fouled by this algae led to their use in culturing Porphyra. In China the farming of this species was initiated about 200 years ago (Trono, 1986).

In the Philippines the culture of Eucheuma started in 1970. Other countries in the region do have seaweed farming activities but these are mostly at the earlier stages of development.

FAO considers that the culture of seaweeds is one of the activities which has positive socio-economic impact on the coastal fishing communities. It is also compatible with coastal environment management which offers positive income-generation to small-scale fishing communities. Seaweeds are used for human consumption and industrial applications.

Of the world production of seaweeds for use in the manufacture of industrial phycocolloids, Asia produces 50 percent of those used for agar, 46 percent of those used for carrageenan and 40 percent of those used for alginates. These extracts come from red and brown algae.

In general, the brown seaweeds mainly grow in temperate waters while the red seaweeds in warm tropical waters. The latter group of seaweeds are used in the production of agar and carrageenan. The cultivation of these species is therefore, of great interest to the developing countries particularly in Southeast Asia.

Seaweed farming or “mariculture” became popular in 1970 when the culture of Eucheuma species was initially developed in the Philippines. Eucheuma is a source of carrageenan. This extract is mainly used as a stabilizing and gelatinizing agent in food, in toothpaste, cosmetic products and in solid air fresheners.

The international demand for carrageenan increased over the last two decades. Harvesting of the wild stocks, therefore, became intensive and the farming techniques developed for its production somehow minimized the depletion of natural stocks. The Philippines in 1972 produced only less than 20 tons of Eucheuma. However, the Philippines succeeded in increasing its total annual production of seaweeds to over 167 000 metric tons in 1985. The farming of seaweeds is replacing the traditional seaweed collection done in the past. It is placed as third marine product for export.

There are other species of seaweeds which are being cultivated such as Gracilaria, Caulerpa, Porphyra, Undaria and Laminaria. These species are mainly used for food. The techniques of farming will be given in this training course which the participants hopefully would assimilate in the next three weeks of training activities.

Other uses of seaweeds besides food and industrial applications are animal feeds and fertilizers. Brown seaweeds are used in the production of animal feeds as sources of iodine and other trace elements. They are also used as organic fertilizer and source of certain hormones.

The demand for brown seaweeds have been increasing due to their uses as source of animal feeds and fertilizers in the last 30 years. It developed in Ireland and Norway. However, the prohibitive cost of drying due to high cost of oil led to the drastic decline and collapse in the manufacture of these products. In the tropical region such as Southeast Asia where reasonable supplies of these brown algae (e.g., Sargassum) are found and climatic conditions for open air drying is feasible should exploit this resource and develop a similar industrial application on a commercial scale. Developing countries could perhaps revive the European market for these applications by supplying the market with dried seaweeds or establish processing facilities themselves.

The socio-economic benefits which the small-scale fishermen households derive from seaweed farming is one of the over-riding factors which justifies the organization of this training course. Government technicians and seafarmers alike are given the opportunity to obtain training so that they may serve as the instruments of development and expansion of seaweed farming in the region.

In the Philippines, a number of studies have shown that sizeable portions of coastal populations (coastal fishermen and their families) are gainfully employed full-time in seaweed farming particularly in the southern and central regions of the country. It provides the fishing households with cash income which enable them to narrow the gap between their needs and what is avail-able to them from time to time.

Status and potentials of seaweed farming development

Most countries in Asia have already started to develop their seaweed resources and they are in various stages of development.

In countries where seaweed cultivation has become an industry, efforts are concentrated in studies on how to reduce production costs, development of high quality products and regulation and management of the industry.

In countries where exploitation of seaweeds has just started, research and development thrusts are directed towards expansion of production areas and identification of seaweed sites or areas suitable for seaweed farming. On the other hand, in places where production depends on wild stocks collection and harvesting, development efforts are geared towards identification of new sea-weed grounds for exploitation and protection of stocks from overharvesting.

The role of FAO in seaweed farming development

Recognizing the socio-economic impact of seaweed farming on small-scale fisheries development, FAO through the financial support of the UNDP is promoting the exchange of technical information and sharing of practical experiences among developing countries through training. This training course is one of them. Through the auspices of the two Regional FAO/UNDP Projects, i.e., the ASEAN Regional Small-Scale Coastal Fisheries Development Project and the Regional Seafarming Development and Demonstration Project, this Training Course on Seaweed Farming is organized.

This course is designed to give you the essential technical knowledge about seaweeds and hands-on training on farming techniques, harvesting and processing.

On behalf of the FAO, I would like to thank the Government of the Philippines through the Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources and the Marine Science Institute of the University of the Philippines for hosting this training course. I am sure that the participants will acquire the knowledge they need and benefit greatly from this training course in the furtherance of seaweed farming in their respective countries.

I wish each one of you a pleasant stay in the Philippines and success in your endeavor.

Annex 6
POOLED RESULTS OF THE TRAINING

I.UNDERLINE THE ANSWER THAT SUITS YOU BEST.
 A.Objectives
  1. Were you aware of the objectives of this training course?
   Fully  8
   Partially  10
   Not at all  -
 B.Mechanics
  1. How do you rate the time schedule?
   Very satisfactory  1
   Satisfactory  6
   Fairly satisfactory  6
   Not satisfactory  5
  2. The training facilities?
   Excellent  1
   Good  7
   Fair  7
   Poor  2
 C.The training course activities?
  1. Do you feel the activities of the training course were:
   Interesting  2
   Stimulating  1
   Informative  12
   None of the above  1
 D.Methodology
  1. How would you rate the teaching methods used in this training course?
   Very effectiveEffectiveNot effective
   Lectures5103
   Work assignment1113
   Field trips576
   Case studies174
II.THE FIELD TRIPS
 1.Are you satisfied with the organizational arrangements for the
  field trips (such as transport, accommodations, etc.)?
   CebuBoholBolinao
   Completely641
   Very663
   Fairly322
   Not very347
   Not at all-24
 2.What opportunity did you get to discuss professional issues with the personnel working at the site(s) of the field trip?
    CebuBoholBolinao
   A great deal15-
   Enough986
   In-between824
   Not enough-36
   None- 1
 3.How important was this field trip in relation to the whole training activity?
    CebuBoholBolinao
   Very important5104
   Fairly1044
   In-between226
   Not very114
   Not at all 1-
 4.How much did this field trip added to your professional knowledge?
    CebuBoholBolinao
   A great deal492
   Quite a lot845
   In-between425
   Not much125
   Nothing-- 
 5.How great was the value of the field trip in helping you become better acquainted with your colleagues and the staff members?
    CebuBoholBolinao
   Very great553
   Great474
   Fair536
   Little333
   Not at all1-1
 6.Was the technical information received during the field trip satisfactory?
    CebuBoholBolinao
   Very46 
   Fairly879
   In-between3 7
   Not very433
   Not at all-- 
 7.Did you get practical hints which will be of use to you in your own work?
    CebuBoholBolinao
   A great deal331
   Many26 
   Some12811
   A few112
   None at all-- 
       


IIIUNDERLINE THE ANSWER THAT SUITS YOU BEST.
 1.How do you rate the amount of time made available for this course?
   Far too much1
   Too much3
   Just right13
   Too little1
   Far too little-
 2.How do you rate the instructional level of the lectures for this subject?
   Far too high3
   Too high1
   just right11
   Too low1
   Far too low2
 3.How do you rate the balance between lectures and discussions/practicals?
   Far too many lectures1
   Too many lectures1
   Just right15
   Too many discussions/practicals-
   Far too many discussions/practicals-
 4.How do you rate the quality of the presentation of the lectures for this subject?
   Excellent3
   Good7
   In-between4
   Poor2
   Very poor2
 5.How do you rate the value of the discussions for deepening your understanding of this subject matter?
   Essential1
   Very useful9
   In-between7
   Not very useful1
   Useless-
 6.How do you rate the importance of this subject matter for your own work?
   Very high2
   High7
   In-between8
   Low1
   Very low-
 7.How do you rate the relevance of the background material to the subject matter treated?
   Very high-
   High4
   In-between13
   Low1
   Very low-


IV. QUESTION/ANSWERS
 1.What is the quality of the meals?
   DilimanCebuBoholBolinao
   Very good3441
   Good5684
   Passable8655
   Poor1215
   Very poor---3
 2.What is the quality of the accommodation?
   DilimanCebuBoholBolinao
   Very good16--
   Good12742
   Passable2464
   Poor--66
   Very poor1126
 3.How suitable is the lecture hall?
   Diliman   
   Very good6 
   Moderately10 
   Somewhat2 
   Not very- 
   Not at all- 
 4.Describe the transportation facilities?
   DilimanCebuBoholBolinao
   Very good9786
   Good7754
   Passable2434
   Poor--13
   Very poor--11
 5.Describe contacts with the staff members
   DilimanCebuBoholBolinao
   Very good3571
   Good11756
   Passable3536
   Poor-123
   Very poor1--1
 6.How much opportunity are you given for private study?
   A great deal2 
   Enough9 
   Some2 
   Little2 
   Far too little2 
 7.Describe the duration of the sessions
    LecturesPracticalsField work
   Far too long 211
   Too long 546
   just right 1067
   Too short 153
   Far too short -11
 8.Describe the size of the group
   Far too large -  
   Too large -  
   Just right 18  
   Too small -  
   Far too small -  
 9.How much free time is there?
   DilimanCebuBoholBolinao
   Far too much  52
   Too much1125
   Just right91176
   Too little5423
   Far too little3222


V.QUESTIONS/ANSWERS. PLEASE UNDERLINE YOUR ANSWER.
 A.The group of participants
  1.The size of the group for the purpose of the activity was:
    Far too big1  
    Too big2  
    Just right14  
    Too small1  
    Far too small-  
  2.The composition by professional qualifications was:
    Far too mixed1  
    Too mixed1  
    Just right15  
    Not mixed enough1  
    Not nearly mixed enough-  
  3.The composition by nationalities represented was:
    Far too mixed-  
    Too mixed2  
    Just right14  
    Not mixed enough2  
    Not nearly mixed enough-  
 B.Contacts
  4.Professional contacts with the lecturing staff were:
    Very good2  
    Good9  
    In-between6  
    Poor1  
    Very poor1  
  5.Professional contacts with the other participants were:
    Very good3  
    Good12  
    In-between2  
    Poor2  
    Very Poor-  
 C.The duration of the activity
  6.The duration in regard to the programme covered was:
    Far too long1  
    Too long2  
    Just right13  
    Too short2  
    Far too short-  
  7.The duration in regard to your own requirements was:
    Far too long1  
    Too long1  
    Just right11  
    Too short4  
    Far too short1  
 D.Lecture and practicals
  8.The balance of time given to lectures and time available for discussions/practicals was:
    Very good1  
    Good8  
    In-between6  
    Poor3  
  9.The presentation of the lecture was:
    Very good3  
    Good8  
    In-between3  
    Poor2  
    Very poor2  
       


  10.The presentation of the practicals (including trips) was:
     DilimanCebuBoholBolinao
   Very good2471
   Good11744
   In-between2436
   Poor1345
   Very poor---2
 E,Relevance
 11.The relevance of the background material was:
   Very high  - 
   High  4 
   In-between  15 
   Low  - 
   Very low  - 
 12.The relevance of the field trip(s) to the activity was:
      CebuBoholBolinao
   Very high 332
   High 643
   In-between 798
   Low 113
   Very low 112
 13.The overall relevance of the activity to your own work was:
   Very high  2 
   High  4 
   In-between  11 
   Low  1 
   Very low  - 
 F.Organization and facilities
 14.The quality of the meeting rooms was:
     DilimanCebuBoholBolinao
   Very good3322
   Good131065
   In-between2355
   Poor--31
   Very poor-114
 15.The quality of the accommodation was:
    DilimanCebuBoholBolinao
   Very good4721
   Good10994
   In-between2114
   Poor--44
   Very poor-125
 16.The quality of the laboratory facilities was
    DilimanBolinao  
   Very good84  
   Good37  
   In-between45  
   Poor21  
   Very poor-1  
 17.The opportunity for private study was:
    DilimanCebuBoholBolinao
   Ample1--1
   Enough810109
   In-between3444
   Too little1111
   Far too little2111
 G.The activity as such
 18.The theoretical level was:
   Far too high3   
   Too high1   
   Just right14   
   Too low-   
   Far too low-   
 19.The practical level was:
   Far too complicated-   
   Too complicated-   
   Just right16   
   Too simple2   
   Far too simple-   
 20.The amount of theoretical lecture was
   Far top much 1  
   Too much 2  
   Just right 13  
   Too little 1  
   Far too little 1  
 21.The amount of practical work was:
   Far too much 1  
   Too much -  
   Just right 14  
   Too little 3  
   Far too little -  
 22.The programming of the activity was:
   Far too rigid 2  
   Too rigid 2  
   Just right 9  
   Too lax 3  
   Far too lax -  

Annex 7
CLOSING REMARKS OF MR. JUSTO R. MONTEMAYOR
ASSISTANT DIRECTOR
BUREAU OF FISHERIES AND AQUATIC RESOURCES TRAINING COURSE ON SEAWEED FARMING

I would like to welcome you back to Manila. It is very evident that you have really gone out to work in the field as shown by your dark, tanned complexion. The saying that “black is beautiful” applies to each one of the participants on account of your sun brunt skin.

It is our sincere hope that each one of you not only gained theoretical knowledge about seaweeds, but most of all acquired the practical know-how on seaweed farming which is the main objective of the course.

I understand that you were able to see for yourselves the seaweed industry activities in Cebu, Bohol and Leyte. You were also given the opportunity to practice what a seaweed farmer does in seaweed fanning. While it is not possible to see and observe the whole cycle of farming seaweeds, it is hoped that the exposure you made in the seaweed farms had given you adequate knowledge and hands-on experience. These, hopefully, would enable you to apply what you have just learned during the last three weeks from our country to your respective countries.

We are indeed very happy to be part of this learning process. We, in the Philippines do not profess to know everything about seaweed farming but we just happened to develop this industry ahead of the ASEAN countries in Southeast Asia and the Pacific. Hence, hosting this training course is indeed an honor and privilege.

In the course of your training activities you might have encountered some difficulties, the Project Coordinator, ASEAN/UNDP/FAO Regional Small-Scale Coastal Fisheries Development Project, the Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources, with the cooperation of the Marine Science Institute, tried their best to arrange the training programme as easy as possible. On the other hand, there are not adequate comfortable facilities in rural areas where seaweed farming could best be observed and practiced. We therefore, beg to apologize for the inconveniences you encountered which did not meet your expectations during the period of your training.

In closing, I would like to congratulate each one of you for successfully completing the training period and wish you all the best of luck and success in your seaweed farming development. Perhaps in the future we could meet again not to train, but to exchange experiences and information to know the progress each country made on seaweed farming and production.

Till then, good luck and good bye.

Annex 8
CLOSING STATEMENT OF DR. GAVINO C. TRONO, JR.
TRAINING COORDINATOR
TRAINING COURSE ON SEAWEED FARMING

Up to the first half of the 1980's the developmental efforts in aquaculture were mainly centered on finfishes, crustaceans and mollusks. It was only very recent when the seaweed resources were recognized as an area of high potentials for development. The recognition of the importance of seaweeds as a fishery resource and as an alternate source of livelihood for coastal populations in developing countries in Asia have been the driving force which made possible the holding of this training programme. This training course was designed to develop/promote qualified expertise in seaweed farming to help in food production, provide cash crops and open new alternative employment to enhance the socio-economic welfare of the coastal communities as well as offer practical training on seaweed farming and management of natural stocks of economically important seaweed species.

The training programme consisted of basic lectures and hands-on field training on the culture of Eucheuma, Caulerpa and Gracilaria, and the assessment and rationale utilization of natural stocks of economic species such as Sargassum. The services of experts were employed to deliver high quality information on the different subjects for the purpose of enhancing the learning capabilities of the participants. The physical facilities of Marine Science Institute were made available for the training to further improve the learning environment.

The programming of the training activities within a three-week period has out of necessity been quite hectic, but it was felt that such arrangements were reasonable in order to avoid wastage in time and funds.

The learning process in an exercise such as this training is significantly influenced by two major factors; by the capabilities of the training instructors to convey/communicate the information which are to be learned by the. participants, and the ability, interest and discipline of the participants to learn what are being taught to them. In a very heterogeneous group of this sort, the background on the subject matter and the ability to comprehend the medium of instruction are additional factors which further influenced the learning process. From the Training Director's perception most of the “small” problems encountered during the conduct of this training stemmed from these factors. The failure of several of the participants to observe discipline has also been identified as one contributory factor inimical to the learning process.

Notwithstanding these constraints, the training staff believes that the objectives of this course has been achieved based on the quality of the information being conveyed to the participants and the expertise and all-out effort rendered. The ultimate measure of the success of this training programme, however, will only be known a few years from now and such is mainly dependent on you, the participants. This is the challenge which the training staff and the sponsors are directing you. We strongly encourage you to answer this challenge. Your failure to come up to this challenge will mean a tremendous loss in our efforts, time, energy and funds on our part. It is now your ball game.

In order to help your meet this challenge please let us know of the additional assistance which you may require. On my part and I am sure also from the members of the training staff, it has been a pleasure and a rewarding experience to have at least been able to influence your thoughts and future activities towards the need to develop the seaweed resources in your countries.

Thank you.

Annex 9
THE IMPORTANCE OF SEAWEED RESOURCES AND THE NEED FOR SEAWEED TRAINING
1

by

Dr. Herminio R. Rabanal2

1 Talk delivered during the Closing Ceremonies of the Training Course on Seaweed Farming, sponsored by the ASEAN/UNDP/FAO Regional Small-Scale Coastal Fisheries Development Project and the Seafarming Development and Demonstration Project held at the University of the Philippines Campus, Diliman Quezon City, Metro Manila, Philippines, 21 May 1988.

2 Consultant (Aquaculture), 8 Basilan Road, Philamlife Homes, Quezon City, Metro Manila, Philippines.

I understand that today you have just successfully completed your training on the culture and rational utilization of seaweeds. I greet you and commend you for completing this very valuable training course. Eight years ago in April 1981, the FAO/UNDP-South China Sea Fisheries Development and Coordinating Programme, a predecessor of the ASEAN/UNDP/FAO Regional Small-Scale Coastal Fisheries Development Project, one of your sponsors, initiated a training course on Gracilaria algae patterned along the same lines as your course and practically using the same expertise and more, in this course.

I can see from your course outline that you covered more species of the economic seaweeds than the first course. You also have wider area and much more diversified practical activities. It is to the credit of the organizers of your course and the wise counsel of your instructors that this has happened.

The seaweeds as I am sure you have now realized are very interesting groups of living plants. They have great variety in size from very microscopic to giant plants of the oceans. They live in a great variety of environments from slightly freshwater as in the Gracilaria to strictly marine forms like the Sargassum. They may also occupy very shallow areas and may tolerate intermittent drying-up while others occupy the sea bottom down to medium depths which can be reached by sunlight. Some require very clear water while others can tolerate slightly turbid waters. There are those that can grow in stagnant areas but most of them would require some amount of current in their natural environment. As they inhabit very varied environments, one of the most interesting characteristics of the seaweeds is their ability to synthesize varied substances that are peculiar, interesting, some useful while others can be powerful poisons to other organisms.

It is the last named characteristic — the attribute to form unique substances, that has made many species of seaweeds useful and of high economic value today. I must, however, remind you that this training can be considered only as a scratch on the surface with regards to the culture and utilization of economic seaweeds. I am sure that your instructors have emphasized to you that there is a lot more to know about seaweeds. There are many more species of seaweeds for which we have no knowledge of while there are only few that we know a little of such as the ones you dealt with this course. Very little is still known of the many more useful substances from many other kinds of seaweeds that have not yet been discovered or we know very little of.

It is with this realization that there are many seaweeds we do not know yet and there are many more useful substances from seaweeds still undiscovered, that underscores the usefulness and need for the course that you have just completed. It is also for this reason that your sponsors have required your respected institutions in your respective countries some knowledge about yourselves and that you have some involvement or will have such involvement of seaweed work in your respective countries. It must be borne in mind that if this training is to be of some use at all, some of you should come out in your respective countries in the not too distant future to provide some form of leadership to initiate, if you have not yet initiated, or to expand, if you have already started, the seaweed work in your respective institutions. I trust that you will make full use of the knowledge that you have just acquired.

In this connection, I would like to inform you that in the course of my aquaculture work in the global scope but more especially in the Asian region, I am very pleased and I enjoyed my visits and exchanges of information with fisheries people in your respective countries. In the People's Republic of China where I had the opportunity to visit the coastal areas to help formulate a coastal aquaculture project, I saw the vast coastal and marine resources in that country. It is of interest to mention at this point that the Chinese art of seaweed processing dates from prehistoric times. In India where I had occasion to visit some years back particularly the tropical southern portion of the country, relatively advanced research and development work on seaweeds have been going on for sometime. In Indonesia, the archipelagic nature of that country favors a great variety and quantity of marine resources including that of the seaweeds. Seaweed work composes a part of an ongoing foreign-assisted seafarming project for that country. It has been sometime since I had the opportunity to visit the Republic of Korea, but at the time of my visit that country has achieved very advanced techniques in the culture of the economic seaweeds present along its coasts. Malaysia is one other country which has big potentials for the utilization of natural seaweed stocks and for the culture of many economic species. In fact multilateral technical assistance projects on seaweed culture have already been initiated in that country. With regards to the Philippines, initially, natural stocks of economic seaweeds were overexploited so that today this country has to depend on culture to produce the seaweeds that it exports. Unfortunately, it seems that this country is overconcentrating in the culture of only limited group of economic seaweeds and has not diversified in this activity. Thailand likewise has many natural seaweed areas and has high potential for the culture of many economic species. That country in fact hosts the FAO/UNDP Regional Seafarming Development and Demonstration Project, your other co-sponsor for this training. In addition, we could have also expected participants from the Pacific islands countries where seaweed utilization and farming also has very high potentials.

Of course, it should also be realized that mutual exchange of knowledge and information in this field can be very useful. The many friendships and acquaintances that you have formed in this training should be kept and constantly refreshed in the years to come. Whether you realized it or not, I am sure that you have also contributed some knowledge, no matter how little, when you described to your co-participants and to your instructors your own work and experiences before you came here. It is therefore, hoped that you will maintain your contacts and benefit from the exchange as you progress in your future work.

In closing, I would like to express the hope that you have gained something useful during your participation in this course. I hope that you did not work yourself out, but you have also some occasion to see many beautiful sights in this country. If you have not, however, you better stay for some more days, or arrange to come back sometime. I hope you enjoyed your stay in the Philippines and best wishes and good luck to you in your future endeavors.

Annex 10
IMPRESSIONS OF THE PARTICIPANTS OF THE TRAINING COURSE ON SEAWEED FARMING
2–21 MAY 1988

by

Dr. V.K.S. Chennubhotla
(Participant from India)

On behalf of all the participants of the above programme, I wish to state that the training programme was informative and interesting to us. After an initial orientation course on general aspects of seaweeds, the team left for Cebu.

With the kind courtesy of the President of Marine Colloids Philippines Incorporated, the team have stayed in the farm house located at Bohol. This has given all the participants an excellent opportunity to see the actual farming of Eucheuma, harvesting and processing the same for extraction of the phycocolloid, the carrageenan.

Other features of interest of the programme were the Caulerpa farming in ponds in Mactan Island, Lapu-Lapu City and the demonstration of the Gracilaria farming technique that is followed in Chile.

The participants are of the opinion that these economic species can be hopefully transplanted in their countries in suitable areas. Some of the participants are of the view that the training programme can be further improved by the faculty staff in developing more rapport with the participants by treating them as colleagues and not as students. The field programme arranged by the Project Coordinator in Cebu was excellent. It really gave the participants the practical exposure to seaweed farming and processing. The President of the Seaweed Farming Association of the Philippines was very accommodating and the hospitality he gave to the participants was very warm indeed.

All the participants wish to place on record the excellent care taken by Mrs. Medina N. Delmendo, Project Coordinator, RAS/84/016, on the participants and in conducting the course smoothly.

I take this opportunity to thank FAO/UNDP/BFAR/DAF/MSI/NACA for arranging this training programme and for successfully conducting the same.

Thank you.

PUBLICATIONS AND DOCUMENTS OF THE
ASEAN/UNDP/FAO REGIONAL SMALL-SCALE COASTAL FISHERIES DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
(RAS/84/016)

Working Papers

ASEAN/SF/86/WP/1 Rabanal, H. R. Seafarming as alternative to small-scale fishing in ASEAN region. Manila, ASEAN/UNDP/FAO Regional Small-Scale Coastal Fisheries Development Project, 1986. 55p.

ASEAN/SF/86/WP/2 Soeyanto, T. The status of Bali Strait fisheries with special reference to Muncar, Kedonganan and Jimbaran coastal villages. Manila, ASEAN/UNDP/FAO Regional Small-Scale Coastal Fisheries Development Project, 1986. 36p.

ASEAN/SF/86/WP/3 Boongerd, S. and S. Chitrapong. Small-scale fishing for squids and related species in Thailand. Manila, ASEAN/UNDP/FAO Regional Small-Scale Coastal Fisheries Development Project, 1986. 44p.

Workshop Reports/Other General Reports

ASEAN/SF/86/GEN/1 Report of national consultative meeting on aquaculture engineering held in Tigbauan Research Station, SEAFDEC Aquaculture Department, Iloilo City, Philippines, 2–5 October 1985. Manila, ASEAN/UNDP/FAO Regional Small-Scale Coastal Fisheries Development Project, 1986. 186p.

ASEAN/SF/86/GEN/2 Zabala, P. T. (Comp.) Preliminary annotated bibliography on small-scale fisheries in the ASEAN Region. Manila, ASEAN/UNDP/FAO Regional Small-Scale Coastal Fisheries Development Project, 1986. 41p.

ASEAN/SF/87/GEN/3 Report on the training course on shrimp culture held in Jepara, Indonesia, 2–19 December 1987. Manila, ASEAN/UNDP/FAO Regional Small-Scale Coastal Fisheries Development Project, 1987. 63p.

ASEAN/SF/88/GEN/4 Report on the training course on small-scale fisheries extension held in Semarang, Indonesia, 26 January–14 February 1988. Manila, ASEAN/UNDP/FAO Regional Small-Scale Coastal Fisheries Development Project, 1988. (In preparation).

ASEAN/SF/88/GEN/5 Report on the training course on fisheries extension methodology held in Penang, Malaysia, 13–26 March 1988. Manila, ASEAN/UNDP/FAO Regional Small-Scale Coastal Fisheries Development Project, 1988. 266p.

ASEAN/SF/88/GEN/6 Report on the training course on seaweed farming held in Manila, Philippines, 2–21 May 1988. Manila, ASEAN/UNDP/FAO Regional Small-Scale Coastal Fisheries Development Project, 1988. 169p.

ASEAN/SF/88/GEN/7 Report on the training/study tour of pelagic fishing with the use of “payaw” held in Manila, Philippines, 16 May–4 June 1988. Manila, ASEAN/UNDP/FAO Regional Small-Scale Coastal Fisheries Development Project, 1988. (In preparation).

ASEAN/SF/88/GEN/8 Report of the workshop on artificial reefs development and management held in Penang, Malaysia, 13–16 September 1988. Manila, ASEAN/UNDP/FAO Regional Small-Scale Coastal Fisheries Development Project, 1988. (In preparation).

ASEAN Fisheries Manuals

ASEAN/SF/86/Manual No. 1 Suprayitno, H. Manual of running water fish culture. Manila, ASEAN/UNDP/FAO Regional Small-Scale Coastal Fisheries Development Project, 1986. 34p.

ASEAN/SF/88/Manual No. 2 Godardo, L.J. Manual on seaweed farming: 1. Eucheuma spp. Manila, ASEAN/UNDP/FAO Regional Small-Scale Coastal Fisheries Development Project, 1988. 25p.

ASEAN/SF/88/Manual No. 3 Trono, G.C., Jr. Manual on seaweed culture: 2. Pond culture of Caulerpa. 3. Pond culture of Gracilaria. Manila, ASEAN/UNDP/FAO Regional Small-Scale Coastal Fisheries Development Project, 1988. 20p.

Periodic Progress Reports

ASEAN/SF/86/PR-1 Soesanto, V. Project progress report of the ASEAN/UNDP/FAO Regional Small-Scale Coastal Fisheries Development Project, 5 October 1985–5 April 1986. Manila, ASEAN/UNDP/FAO Regional Small-Scale Coastal Fisheries Development Project, 1986. 9p.

ASEAN/SF/86/PR-2 Soesanto, V. Project progress report of the ASEAN/UNDP/FAO Regional Small-Scale Coastal Fisheries Development Project, 6 April–6 October 1986. Manila, ASEAN/UNDP/FAO Regional Small-Scale Coastal Fisheries Development Project, 1986. l1p.

ASEAN/SF/88/PPER-3 Delmendo, M.N. Project performance evaluation report of the ASEAN/UNDP/FAO Regional Small-Scale Coastal Fisheries Development Project, 31 July 1988. Manila, ASEAN/UNDP/FAO Regional Small-Scale Coastal Fisheries Development Project, 1988. 23p.

Technical Reports Contributed to Symposia/Meetings, etc.

ASEAN/SF/85/Tech. 1 Rabanal, H. R. and V. Soesanto. The world fishery and culture of Macrobrachium and related prawn species. Contributed to the National Conference on Prawn Technology, sponsored by the Philippine Fishfarmer's Technical Assistance Foundation, Inc., Manila, Philippines, 27–28 November 1985. 16p.

ASEAN/SF/86/Tech. 2 Rabanal, H. R. and V. Soesanto. Commercial species of shrimps and prawns, their sources and export markets. Contributed to the Seminar on Quality Control in the Production, Processing and Marketing of Frozen Shrimps for Export, sponsored by Food Research Department, Food Terminal Incorporated, Taguig, Metro Manila, Philippines, 29–31 July 1986. 64p.

ASEAN/SF/86/Tech. 3 Rabanal, H. R. Status and prospects of shrimp farming in the Philippines. Contributed to the Monthly Seminar Series on Timely and Related Fisheries Issues, sponsored by the Philippine Council for Agriculture and Resources Research and Development, (PCARRD), Los Ban˜os, Laguna, Philippines, 5 November 1986. 24p.

ASEAN/SF/87/Tech. 4 Delmendo, M. N. Fishery administration and policy in the Philippines: Past and present. Contributed to the National Conference on Fisheries Policy and Planning, Baguio City, Philippines, 16–20 March 1987. 35p.

ASEAN/SF/86/Tech. 5 Delmendo, M. N. Milkfish culture in pens: An assessment of its contribution to overall fishery production of Laguna de Bay. Paper read in the Seminar on the occasion of the Fish Conservation Week, BFAR, October 1987. 17p.

ASEAN/SF/87/Tech. 6 Delmendo, M. N. and B. H. Delmendo. Small-scale aquaculture operations in the ASEAN countries. Manila, ASEAN/UNDP/FAO Regional Small-Scale Coastal Fisheries Development Project, 1987. 49p.

ASEAN/SF/88/Tech. 7 Rabanal, H. R. History of aquaculture. Manila, ASEAN/UNDP/FAO Regional Small-Scale Coastal Fisheries Development Project, 1988. 13p.

ASEAN/SF/88/Tech. 8 Rabanal, H. R. and M. N. Delmendo. Organization of the aquaculture industry. Manila, ASEAN/UNDP/FAO Regional Small-Scale Coastal Fisheries Development Project, 1988. 10p.

ASEAN/SF/88/Tech. 9 Rabanal, H. R. Report on the World Aquaculture Society, 19th Annual Conference and Exposition, Honolulu, Hawaii, U.S.A., 4–10 January 1988. Manila, ASEAN/UNDP/FAO Regional Small-Scale Coastal Fisheries Development Project, 1988. 99p.


Previous Page Top of Page