FAO GLOBAL INFORMATION AND EARLY WARNING SYSTEM ON FOOD AND AGRICULTURE
WORLD FOOD PROGRAMME
At the request of the Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives of Nepal (MoAC), a joint FAO/WFP Food Security Assessment Mission visited the country from 20 March to 8 April 2007. The overall objective of the assessment was to have a better understanding of chronic and transitory (disaster-affected, short-term) food insecurity by assessing the 2007 winter cereal crops, current food availability, market access and food utilization situation in the country at national, sub-national and household levels so that appropriate actions can be taken by the government and the international community to minimize the impact of potential food insecurity.
The Mission held meetings with relevant institutions, including government, international agencies, donors, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and the private sector, and reviewed available data and information on food security from different sources. Field trips covered 20 districts, located in four development regions and three ecological zones (Terai, Hills, and Mountains) with focus on the most food insecure areas in the Mid-Western Hills and Mountains (with chronic food insecurity) and in the Eastern and Central Terai (affected by droughts and floods in 2006).
The Mission observed crop-growing conditions and assessed the yields under different categories and assessed the impact of 2006 droughts and floods on food availability. Extensive interviews were conducted with farmers, millers, local government officers, agricultural research institutes, seed and fertilizer companies, and local NGOs regarding short- and long-term food production and supply problems.
The Mission visited customs points along the Indian border and interviewed officers, traders (grain, vegetables, livestock and inputs) in Kathmandu and local markets, millers and farmers in the fields to obtain first-hand information regarding formal and informal trade in food and agricultural inputs and their impact on food security.
Extensive interviews were also conducted with households to obtain information on food consumption, nutrition and health, and coping status (remittances, non-agriculture activities, changes in food consumption, assistance by government, WFP, NGOs, etc.). In addition, telephone interviews were conducted with government officials in districts that the Mission could not visit. Prior to its departure to rural Nepal, the Mission held debriefing sessions with government authorities and UN agencies in Kathmandu.
With assistance from the Household Survey Unit of the Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS), the Mission conducted household-level food consumption, poverty, under-nourishment analyses by using Nepal Living Standards Survey II (2003/04) data, which is the second multi-topic national household survey conducted by the CBS.
The FAO team comprised Dr Cheng Fang, Dr Ramesh Sharma and Mr Raphy Favre. The WFP team included Mr Siemon Hollema. Two FAO local consultants, Mr Rajendra Pratap Singh and Dr Govind Pandey, participated in the field trips and made contributions to the data collection and analysis. In addition, Mr Subhash Singh and Ms Kanta Kanal from WFP assisted in arranging field visits.
We would like to thank MoAC for its strong support to the Mission and CBS for its data support. We gratefully acknowledge the considerable assistance provided by Mr Ram Hari Gaihre, the CBS’s Household Survey Section officer; and Mr Ravi Kumar Dangol and Ms Purna Laxmi Rajbhandari, of the Agribusiness Promotion Programme of MoAC.
This Mission was made possible through financial assistance by the Department for International Development (DFID). The views expressed in this report do not in any way reflect the official opinion by DFID, MoAC or CBS.
Nepal is characterized by low levels of human development and incomes. According to the 2006 UNDP Human Development Report, Nepal ranks 138 among 177 nations in terms of the Human Development Index, and 156 in terms of GDP per capita in Purchasing Power Parity (PPP$). Both indicators rank Nepal the lowest among its neighbours.
Nepal experienced a turbulent socio-economic situation during the 11-year insurgency, which cost an estimated 13 000 lives and inflicted considerable physical, psychological, social and economic damage. The historic agreement of November 2006 between the Seven Party Alliance (SPA) and the Nepal Communist Party (Maoists) paved the way for a promising opportunity to achieve lasting peace and to address the underlying causes of the conflict. It has also opened a window of opportunity for agricultural and rural development.
Agriculture is the mainstay of the economy, providing livelihood for more than 80 percent of the population and accounting for some 40 percent of Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Industrial activities are dominated by the processing of agricultural products including jute, sugarcane, tobacco and grains.
Nepal is vulnerable to several types of natural disasters such as droughts, floods, landslides, windstorms, hailstorms, cold waves, disease epidemics, glacial lake outburst flood (GLOF), fires and earthquakes. Drought, hailstorms, floods and landslides are by far the most serious ones and the most recurrent natural disasters, annually causing significant material and human losses.
The Mission assessed the 2007 wheat and barley production, which were being harvested in many parts of the country in March and April. Prospects for both crops are favourable and output is forecast at above average levels due to timely and sufficient rainfall during the winter season of 2006/07 and no significant damages by hailstorms and other disasters. In aggregate, it is expected that total wheat and barley production will increase by more than 7 percent. However, local drought conditions and hailstorms have badly affected production in several areas in the Far- and Mid-Western Hills and Mountains.
In 2006, adverse climatic conditions significantly affected cereal production in Nepal, especially in the Eastern and Central Terai, which was badly affected by drought. Overall, paddy rice production, the most important crop in Nepal, is estimated to have declined by 13 percent nationally, and between 20 percent to 50 percent in some districts of the Eastern and Central regions. Total cereal production (rice, maize, millet, wheat and barley) in 2006 is estimated at 5.96 million tonnes, 4.5 percent below the previous year and 1.7 percent below the average of the previous five years. By region, 2006 aggregate cereal output is estimated to have declined by 16 percent in the Eastern Terai, 9 percent in the Central Terai, and 5.3 percent in the Western Mountains. The worst affected districts include Saptari (down by 30 percent) and Siraha (down by 28 percent) in Eastern Terai, and Mahottari (down by 21 percent), Dhanusha (down by 20 percent), Rautahat (down by 12 percent) and Sarlahi (down by 12 percent) in the Central Terai.
Cereal (including potato in cereal equivalent) deficit in 2006/07 (November/October) at the national level is estimated at 225 000 tonnes, compared to some 23 000 tonnes in the previous year. Commercial imports are anticipated at 110 600 tonnes to cover some deficit in urban areas and the Terai. The total food aid requirement is estimated at 114 400 tonnes, including 1 400 tonnes in Western Mountains, 19 200 tonnes in Mid-Western Mountains, 31 000 tonnes in Far-Western Mountains, and 62 800 tonnes in Far- Western Hills. The anticipated food aid imports by NFC and WFP of 101 800 tonnes will cover most of the remaining import deficit.
Lack of access to food is the core long-term food insecurity issue in the Hills and Mountains of the Far and Mid-Western Regions because of very low purchasing power and extremely high market prices. Food deficits in these areas will not lead to an increase in private imports, and are not expected to be met from either NFC or WFP due to very high transportation costs which prohibit sufficient quantities of food from being transported to these deficit areas.
Of the uncovered deficit of 114 400 tonnes, WFP is expected to provide 8 864 tonnes under its emergency operations, 33 517 tonnes under its country programme and 39 405 tonnes for food assistance to conflict-affected populations. NFC provided 38 000 tonnes in 2006, and subsidized distributions in 2007 are projected at around 20 000 tonnes.
In terms of size, the Central region has the largest deficits (281 000 tonnes in Central Hills and 113 000 tonnes in Central Terai) because of the highly urbanized capital region of the Kathmandu Valley located in this region. On a per capita basis, the food grain deficit areas are concentrated in the Far- Western Hills (142 kg/person), Far-West Mountains (143 kg/person), Mid-Western Mountains (158 kg/person), and Western Mountains (165 kg/person). Imports of food grains to these areas are mostly limited to subsidized rice distributions through NFC, food aid and small quantities carried by returning migrant workers. Local food production is therefore a key factor to achieving food security in these areas. Local crop failures due to drought, hailstorms or landslides can seriously affect food availability and cause acute food crises.
A total of 42 out of the 75 districts in Nepal are estimated to be food-deficit in 2006/07. Of these, there are 13 districts with per capita cereal production of less than 150 kg. By decreasing order of severity of food deficit, these districts are Kathmandu, Humla, Lalitpur, Bajura, Achham, Dolakha, Bhaktapur, Mahottari, Kalikot, Baitadi, Bajhang, Dolpa and Rautahat. There are a further 14 districts with per capita cereal production of between 150 kg to 180 kg, which is well below the national average and minimum requirement.
Cereal markets in most of the Terai and Hill areas are integrated with Indian markets, and the staple food prices are mainly determined by Indian markets. However, the rice prices in the Mountains are consistently much higher and food markets are highly isolated. The monthly prices for three years from May 2004 to April 2007 show that the rice price in the Mountain markets was on average 177 percent higher than the rice price in the Terai markets of the Mid-Western region and 123 percent higher than in the Eastern region.
Rural poverty is a key factor affecting food security in rural Mid-Western and rural Far-Western regions, with poverty incidence at 46.4 percent and 45.6 percent, respectively, according to estimates by CBS, WFP and World Bank. Based on the Mission’s estimate, people living in the mountains spend (on average) more than 65 percent of their income on food, compared with a national average of 36.9 percent.
The incidence of undernourishment as measured by insufficient caloric intake is very high in Nepal. At national level, based on the Mission estimate, the proportion of undernourished population is estimated at 40.7 percent, with the minimum caloric intake requirement of 2 124 kilocalories per day set by the CBS. Not surprisingly, the Far-Western and Mid-Western rural region have a much lower mean dietary energy consumption (2 250 kcal and 2 310 kcal, respectively, compared to 2 405 kcal of national level) and thus the highest incidence of undernourishment (about 50 percent). Consistently, the share of population with severe deficiency in food energy intake as measured by the threshold level of 1 910 kcal/person/day and 1 810 kcal/person/day is also much higher compared to rural population of the Eastern, Central and Western regions.
The Mission is concerned about the very high levels of malnutrition in Nepal, especially in the Mountain and Hill areas of the Far- and Mid- Western regions, where generally more than 60 percent of children are stunted and 50 percent are underweight, and in the Terai where on average 17.7 percent of children under five suffer acute malnutrition.
Food insecurity in the surplus areas of the Terai and lower Hills is foremost an issue of economic access. Although the incidence of poverty in these areas is generally lower than in the Hills and Mountains of the Far- and Mid-West, the concentration of poverty (as measured by the number of poor people per square kilometre) is very high. Based on the Mission’s observations, the income inequality is likely to be higher in the Terai than in the Hills and Mountains. Vulnerable communities such as Dalits, Adivasi Janajatis and Kamayas (bonded labourers) often struggle to access sufficient food. The result is that the Terai is characterized by very high wasting levels above emergency levels. Other factors responsible for high food insecurity and malnutrition in the Terai include: limited nutritional knowledge, inappropriate hygiene and caring practices and gender division within the household, which places women in a disadvantaged position.
An FAO report (2004) on vulnerable groups in Nepal identified a total vulnerable population of more than 9 million people based on their livelihood (marginal farmers, agricultural labourers, rural service castes, porters and urban poor). Marginal farm households in the Hills and Terai represent the largest vulnerable group, followed by rural service castes, agricultural labourers in the Terai, marginal farm households in the Mountains, porters and poor urban households. Within these livelihood classes, women, children, indigenous peoples and members of the lower caste groups (Dalit and Janajatis) are among the most food insecure.
Long-term food security in Nepal remains problematic. Agricultural production has not kept pace with the growth in population, and average yields are low compared to neighbouring countries. There is an urgent need for investment in seed research and supply, and in the expansion of irrigation facilities. Increased agricultural production generates strong backward and forward linkages in rural Nepal – leading to a variety of rural non-farm activities that are very promising, based on recent trends.
Immediate improvements in food security and employment conditions are key determinants for the success of the peace process. The Mission would like to stress that with chronic food insecurity in many part of the country, substantial and widespread gains in food security are a pre-condition to achieving sustainable peace. In addition, the Mission underlines the importance of closely monitoring vulnerability factors that could jeopardize the peace process.
Nepal is a least developed country and the poorest nation in South Asia. According to the 2006 Human Development Report, Nepal ranks 138 among 177 nations on the Human Development Index. Its per capita Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is estimated at US$232 (average of 2003 to 2005, in 2000 constant price), 44 percent below that of Bangladesh, 58 percent below India, 59 percent below Pakistan, 76 percent below Sri Lanka and Bhutan, and 83 percent below China (Table 1). Nepal has the lowest growth rate among its neighbouring countries. Annual per capita GDP growth is estimated at 2.0 percent from 1979/81 to 2003/05. The economic performance was even worse in the last several years, at –2.7 percent, 1.3 percent, 1.6 percent and 0.7 percent, respectively, from 2002 to 2005.
Annual GDP per capita
(constant US$2 000)
Average annual per
capita GDP growth
Annual per capita GDP
(compared to the previous
Growth of the Nepalese economy is determined largely by the growth of its agricultural sector. Although the share of agriculture in total GDP has been declining over the years, it is still the single largest sector in the economy, accounting for 38 percent of GDP at present (Table 2). Out of the total population of 25.9 million (2005), some 80 percent reside in rural areas and pursue agricultural activities. In the non-agricultural sector, manufacturing, trade and commerce, transport and communication, finance, real estate and community and social services are important sub-sectors. The manufacturing sector is limited largely to low-end consumer items such as carpets, garments and handicrafts, and further development of this sector is constrained by Indian competition, poor infrastructure, a limited local market and the lack of direct sea access. Tourism, traditionally the largest component of the services sector, has fallen behind the finance and real-estate sectors since 2000, due to the impact of the conflict.
As a landlocked country with a low level of development and high dependence on imported capital goods and oil for energy, Nepal faces a chronic deficit in merchandise trade. However, since 2002 the current account has registered small surpluses due to increased remittances from Nepalese working abroad and continued inflows of foreign aid. During March 2005, the government estimated that more than half a million Nepalese were working abroad. Foreign aid has a significant influence on Nepal’s development, with a share in public sector development expenditure of 60 percent.
|Real GDP growth rate (%)||3.4||4.5||6.1||4.7||-0.6||3.3||3.8||2.7||1.9|
|Consumer price inflation||10.0||7.5||2.5||2.7||3.0||5.7||2.9||6.9||8.3|
|Export f.o.b. (US$ m) 1/||474||602||804||737||567||663||773||903||818|
|Import c.i.f. (US$ m)2/||1 246||1 422||1 573||1 473||1 420||1 754||1 908||2 277||2 344|
|Current-account balance (US$ m)||-67||-257||-299||-339||-55.6||-120||-45||1||185|
|Agriculture, value added (% of GDP)||38.8||40.1||39.6||38.3||39.4||39.1||38.6||38.2||n. a.|
|Rural population (% of total population)||87.6||87.1||86.6||86.1||85.6||85.2||84.7||84.2||n. a.|
Geography and agro-ecological settings
A landlocked country, Nepal is situated between India and China and covers an area of 147 480 km2. Only about 17 percent of Nepal’s total land area is suitable for agriculture; 2.5 million hectares with a cropping intensity varying from one to three crops per year. Altitude increases from south to north and ranges from 70 m in the Eastern region (Kanchan Kalan) to 8 848 m (the highest point on earth) in the Himalayas. Differences in elevation result in diverse climatic belts, ranging from humid subtropical in the plains to alpine in the north. The country is subdivided into three major ecological regions. Twenty-three percent is occupied by the Terai plains in the southern belt, 42 percent by the Hills in the middle belt and the remaining 35 percent by the Mountains in the northern belt. These regions have distinct geological, soil, climatic and hydrological characteristics. As a result, land use patterns within these zones are distinctly different:
The Terai consists of flat and fertile alluvial land that extends from the Indo-Gangetic plains. Altitude is from 70 m to 800 m. Thirty-eight percent of the total land area is cultivated. Since, technically, most of the Terai can be irrigated and crops can be cultivated all year round, it has greater potential for productivity growth than the other ecological regions. It is referred to as the "grain basket" of Nepal. Water resources, fertility and flat terrain permit the cultivation of a variety of crops such as paddy, wheat, maize, sugarcane, jute and vegetables.
The Hills lie at an altitude between 800 m and 1 800 m and comprise steeply sloped lands with many small valleys. Only 10 percent of the land area is cultivated. This region comprises several attractive valleys and basins such as Kathmandu, Pokhara, Hetauda, Surkhet and several others, like the Dang valley. These valleys, especially the Kathmandu valley and Pokhara, support a relatively high percentage of the Hills population. Maize is the single most important crop in the Hills. Paddy is grown on irrigated land during the summer season.
The Mountains lies generally above 1 800 m. Only 2 percent of the land is suitable for cultivation. Since this region is mostly steep, rugged and cold, it is sparsely populated. People’s main occupation is raising livestock. Subsistence cultivation is practiced and only one crop per year or three crops in two years is possible. Vegetables are cultivated as cash crops in a few areas with access to markets. However, the vast majority of the Mountains are remote and access to markets and roads is limited.
Data related to crop cultivation and production at national level are collected by the Ministry of Agriculture on the basis of district boundaries which are delineated on administrative considerations. The 75 districts of Nepal are categorized in three ecological zones (Terai, Hills and Mountains) and five development regions. In terms of population, some 48.5 percent live in the Terai, 44.2 percent in the Hills and only 7.3 percent in the Mountains.
Annual rainfall varies from about 250 mm in rain-shadow areas such as the Mustang valley to over 5 200 mm in Pokhara. Distinct wet and dry seasons alternate over the year. Over 80 percent of the annual rainfall occurs during the four months of the monsoon season, which lasts from June to September. During summer, the maximum temperature in the Terai is more than 40°C while it is about 28°C in the Hills. The snow line lies at about 5 000 m. Annual rainfall tends to decrease slightly from east to west and increase with elevation from south to north and on south eastern slopes, which act as a windward for monsoon winds. Rainfall decreases drastically across the Himalaya range, which extends into Tibet.
Western Nepal receives less rainfall than the eastern side and the monsoon rain tends to start later and retreat earlier. The Hills of the Eastern and Central development regions receive monsoon rain approximately one month before the Terai and the Hills of the Far- and Mid-Western development regions. Isohyets of 1 500 to 2 500 mm cover most of the Eastern region while those in the Far- and Mid-Western regions are between 1 000 to 1 500 mm. During the winter, however, rainfall is more reliable in the west than in the east, resulting in higher importance of winter crops in the western part of the country.
Political and social stability
Nepal has experienced a turbulent political situation following an 11-year insurgency that cost an estimated 13 000 lives and inflicted considerable physical, psychological, social and economic damage. The peace agreement of November 2006 between the Seven Party Alliance (SPA) and the Maoists paved the way for a promising opportunity to achieve lasting peace and address the underlying causes of the conflict. It is also providing an opportunity for agricultural and rural development.
Porous border with India and market linkages
Nepal is virtually an open economy vis-à-vis India. As a result of the long and porous border with India, and the Nepal-India Trade Treaty under which trade in primary agricultural products between Nepal and India is free of customs duty and quantitative restrictions. This relationship is seen by analysts both positively and negatively. In the context of agricultural development and food security in Nepal, the positive aspect is the guarantee of a large and growing Indian market for Nepalese agricultural products. The importance that India attaches to stability in cereal supply and prices is also seen positively because this contributes to similar stability in Nepal given strong integration between the two markets. On the negative side, it is very difficult for Nepal to set or influence the prices of tradables independent of those prevailing in India. This limits Nepal’s policy choices. Also seen negatively is the worsening competitive position of Nepalese agriculture vis-à-vis India, in part due to high agricultural subsidies in the latter.
Nepal is vulnerable to several types of natural disasters, including droughts, floods, landslides, windstorms, hailstorms, cold waves, disease epidemics, glacial lake outburst flood (GLOF), fires and earthquakes. Droughts, floods, hailstorms and landslides are by far the most serious and recurrent natural disasters and annually cause significant material and human losses. Based on official disaster statistics, floods and landslides from 1998 to 2002 occurred some 256 times on average in one year and affected on average 24 264 families annually. The middle Hills are mainly prone to landslides and hailstorms while the Terai region is prone to floods and fire. Windstorms, thunderbolts (lightening strikes) and heavy snowfall also affect many areas of the country on a regular basis, causing loss of human lives and considerable damage to the standing crops. While earthquakes are not frequent, Nepal has experienced several destructive earthquakes, with more than 11 000 people killed in four major earthquakes in the past century.
Table A1 and Map A1 in Annexes I and II provide an overview of the main cropping patterns for cereals. On the whole, the availability of irrigation water is the main determinant of the choice of crops and the planting season. Thus, in the Terai in areas with reliable irrigation, three paddy crops can be grown (spring, summer and late summer), while two crops of paddy can be grown in the Hills (summer and spring). Maize can also have three planting seasons in some places in the Terai (spring, summer and winter) and two in the Hills (spring and summer). In the Hills, early maturing maize varieties offer greater crop rotation flexibility and opportunities for higher cropping intensity. Wheat and barley are planted between October and December while harvest starts in the Terai in spring and ends in the Mountains in early summer. Finally, millet is cultivated as a main summer crop in the Mountains and as a relay crop in the Hills (mostly after maize).
In the Hills, the lands/terraces located on the lower part of Hills slopes near the rivers are generally irrigated. In these areas, rice is the major crop in summer followed by wheat in winter (similar to that in the Terai) while on the rainfed upland areas, maize is the major crop. Therefore, the proportion of rice, maize and wheat at district level depends on the availability of irrigation facilities.
Overall aggregate performance
Agriculture is the mainstay of the economy, providing a livelihood for more than 80 percent of the population and accounting for 40 percent of the GDP. In comparison with many other countries of Asia, the structure of the Nepalese economy has not changed much – the share of agriculture in total GDP fell by only 5 percent over a period of about 15 years, from 44 percent in 1990-92 to 39 percent in 2003-05. Moreover, industrial activities are still dominated by the processing of agricultural products like jute, sugarcane, tobacco and cereals. As a result, agricultural performance is also a strong determinant of industrial GDP.
Figure 1 shows growth rates of real agricultural and real non-agricultural GDP for recent years. The average growth rate of agricultural GDP during the 2000/01 to 2005/06 period was 2.8 percent. This is indeed low and only slightly above the population growth rate. What is also equally striking is the very high degree of fluctuation from year to year. The growth rate was 5.5 percent in 2001/02 and only 2.2 percent in the next year. Likewise, it was 3.9 percent in 2003/04, only to slide back in the next year.
The performance in 2005/06 was the worst in recent years. The main reason for the poor performance was the adverse weather conditions that affected mainly paddy, wheat and barley, despite significant growth in cash crops like potato, jute, sugarcane and vegetables, as well as livestock products. Agricultural performance influences industrial GDP to some extent and this sector also suffered considerably.
Although the focus of this analysis is on the most recent years, the fact remains that the functioning of normal economic activities began to deteriorate after 1996 due to the insurgency. Not only were production activities and markets disrupted, but also the delivery of vital development programmes suffered considerably and ceased in many areas. These negative effects accumulated over time, reducing the ability of the economy to withstand shocks.
The conflict not only stalled the creation of additional physical infrastructures, like irrigation, but also destroyed many existing infrastructures. Many agricultural service centres, responsible for the delivery of agricultural services in the villages, stopped functioning.
Cereals, pulses and oilseeds
The growth rate of cereal production, at 1.2 percent over the past five years, has remained frustratingly low and below the growth rate of the population. Moreover, cereal yields are low by regional standards. As a result, competitiveness in domestic markets is continually undermined, and import dependency is growing over time. The reasons for the low productive cereal sector are well known – limited irrigation and missing or inadequate agricultural inputs and product markets (like credit) lead to low adoption of modern technology.
Among cereals, paddy is the most important crop contributing to half of total cereal production and 16 percent of the total cultivated area. Over 70 percent of paddy is produced in the Terai. Paddy production has stagnated over the past five years, growing merely at 0.2 percent per annum. Average yield at 2.56 tonnes/ha is low by regional standards. Lack of year-round irrigation and technology are the main constraints to increasing paddy production.
Maize is the second most important cereal, contributing 25 percent of the total cereal production. Importantly, maize is the only cereal with production growth (3 percent per year) exceeding population growth during the past five years. Most of the increase is due to yield, suggesting growing adoption of hybrid varieties imported from India. Yet, yield levels remain relatively low at 2.09 tonnes/ha in 2006/07. Hybrid maize varieties are highly regarded by Nepalese farmers but availability of seeds is a major constraint. Most hybrids are informally imported from India but replacement rates are low. Hybrid varieties can be used only once and farmers have to buy them every year.
Wheat is the third most important cereal, contributing 20 percent of total cereal production in 2006/07. Over 60 percent of wheat is produced in the Terai. The growth of wheat production has been disappointing, averaging 1.7 percent per annum during 2002-2006. Average yield of 2.04 tonnes/ha is low by regional standards. Wheat yields suffer from the same factors as listed for paddy above, i.e. lack of reliable irrigation, inclement weather and lack of improved technology. In the Far- and Mid-Western Terai, where winter rainfalls are more reliable, rainfed wheat yields tend to be higher.
Millet is a minor cereal, contributing only 4 percent to the overall cereal production in 2006/07. Production growth has virtually stagnated in the past five years (0.6 percent per annum).
Barley is a marginal cereal and in 2006/07 contributed to only 0.4 percent of total cereal production. Over 50 percent of barley is produced in the Mountains. Both area and production have decreased over the past five years: by 1.1 percent and 2 percent, respectively.
Pulses are an important source of protein in the Nepalese diet. The growth rate of production of pulses and oilseeds in recent years has fallen far below the rate of population growth. The production growth rate of pulses averaged 1.4 percent during the past five years. Lentils, which account for 60 percent of pulse production, grew at a rate of 1.4 percent. Oilseeds (mainly mustard) cover approximately 190 000 ha. Oilseed production has been sluggish, growing at 0.6 percent per annum during the past five years. Yields are very low, at about 740 kg/ha.
Cash crops and farm diversification
Cash crops, which include fruits, vegetables, potatoes and sugarcane, account for roughly 20 percent of the total cultivated area. Cash crops have significantly increased over the past five years with a 3 percent annual increase in area, led primarily by increasing demand. Fruit cultivation has significantly increased by 3.7 percent per annum over the past five years. Both tropical/semi-tropical and temperate fruits have achieved similar growth rates. The expansion of the cultivated area of temperate fruit over the past five years is remarkable given the lack of road connectivity, as these fruits are cultivated in remote Mountain areas.
The Nepal Living Standard Survey (NLSS) data show that farms were more diversified in 2003-04 than in 1995-96. The extent of diversification varies across ecological regions and farm sizes. Small farmers in the Mountains and small and medium farmers in the Western Hills were found to be most diversified among the different farm groups. Fruit and vegetable production has increased in importance for small and medium farmers in the Western Hills and Mountains and among small farmers in the Terai. Fruits and vegetables accounted for 15 percent of gross crop output in the Western Hills and Mountains, and 7-8 percent for medium and small farmers in the Eastern Hills.
The livestock sector contributes about 31 percent of the agricultural GDP, which is projected to rise to 45 percent by about 2015, the end of the Agriculture Perspective Plan. Within livestock, dairy accounts for 63 percent of the total value added, followed by meat (32 percent) and eggs (5 percent). Livestock and livestock products are not traded much and account for about 11 percent and 6 percent, respectively, of total agricultural exports and imports. According to the 2003/04 NLSS data, livestock accounts for about 20 percent of total agricultural income, after crops (50 percent).1 However, livestock is important for farm households as livestock is an integral component of the mixed crop-livestock-forest farming system of Nepal and plays other important roles as an asset to mitigate short-term shocks such as droughts.
Commercial livestock production is expanding fairly rapidly in areas close to large population centres. The poultry industry has been a leading sub-sector in commercialization, with strong backward and forward linkages covering marketing activities, animal health and feeds. The commercial pig industry is small but expanding. The milk sub-sector has been doing well overall, with marked seasonal differences in production and supply. Seasonal surpluses are converted to ghee where milk collection is not possible.
Livestock rearing represents an important part of the livelihood strategy of rural Nepalese households. Virtually all farm households own livestock. According to the 2003/04 NLSS, between 1995-96 and 2003-04, there was a shift in the composition of livestock herds owned by farm households. Farms shifted into raising more poultry (up 18 percent) and small ruminants (sheep and goats, up 29 percent) and fewer cows (down 15 percent) and buffalos (down 10 percent).
According to the above survey, income from crop sales stagnated, while income from livestock rearing increased. Real income from livestock production grew 2.4 percent a year on average between 1995-96 and 2003-04. Growth in livestock income has helped to offset some of the decline in income from crop production. The survey also found that a larger number of livestock owners are selling livestock products and that a significantly larger proportion are now using veterinary services, indicating greater commercialization in the sector.
The livestock sub-sector suffers from low productivity due to poor genetic material, shortage of feeds, poor management, animal health and access to markets in the Hills and Mountains. The Study on Nepalese agriculture2 shows that improved livestock breeds account for only 8 percent of cattle, 21 percent of buffalo, 6 percent of sheep, 14 percent of goats, 40-77 percent of pigs and 50 percent of poultry. These percentages are increasing as farmers introduce new animals and use improved semen, notably in accessible areas where there is a higher response to market signals. According to the 2002 ANZDEC study, the livestock sub-sector in Nepal suffers from a 34 percent deficit of Total Digestible Nutrients (TDN) and hence lack of feeds is a serious limiting factor.
Main summer crop season affected by adverse weather
For the 2006 summer crop, the main problem was the variation in the spatial and temporal patterns of rain. Although the monsoon started earlier than usual, rain intensity was weak with below normal precipitation and dry conditions in the districts of Saptari, Siraha, Dhanusa and Udayapur. During July, Eastern, Central and Western regions received 40 percent less than normal precipitation. The Far- and Mid-Western regions had above normal rainfall during this period.
August was a particularly dry month with the entire country facing a shortage of rain. Exceptions to this general pattern were areas in the Far- and Mid-Western regions which received more than 180 percent of normal rainfall. Heavy rainfall on 27 August caused floods and landslides in Western, Mid-Western and Far-Western districts of Banke, Bardiya, Nawalparasi, Jajarkot, Surkhet, Bajura, Achham, Doti, Baitadi and Darchula.
Precipitations for September and October of 2006 were about normal or above normal in most parts of Nepal.
Paddy, maize and millet production
Paddy was the crop most affected by last year’s adverse climatic factors. Paddy is generally transplanted in June/July with the monsoon rains and harvested in October/November. A delay in the monsoon or a dry spell at planting time, as occurred in the summer of 2006, can significantly affect the area planted and production. Overall, paddy rice production declined by 13 percent compared to average. Water shortage during the transplanting season resulted in late planting and land left fallow, particularly in the Eastern Terai. Table 3 shows reductions in paddy production in the most affected districts (Table 4 shows estimates by sub-region).
Changes in 2006 over the average of
the previous five years (%)
The floods that occurred on 27 August, and which mostly affected the districts of Banke and Bardiya, damaged farmers’ land near river banks. However, as flood receded rapidly in these districts, many paddy fields did not suffer but instead benefited from the flood water, which contributed to some recovery from a dry summer. Yet Banke and Bardiya experienced paddy crop losses of 10 and 7 percent compared to the five-year average.
The prospect for spring paddy being planted on irrigated land in March-April 2007 is good due to above average access to irrigation water following good rainfall during the winter of 2006/07.
Overall, maize production was not negatively affected by the dry spell during the summer of 2006. Instead, production increased by 12.1 percent compared to the five-year average (Table 4). This outcome is explained by different crop calendars and land used for the maize crop:
In the Eastern Hills, maize is planted on sloping rain-fed land, during the pre-monsoon rains, and is usually relayed with millet, potato and other crops, and harvested before the end of the monsoon rains. By June, the maize crop was already significantly developed and could better resist temporary lack of rainfall. Some 70 percent of maize is produced in the Hills.
In the Terai and lower Hills, irrigated maize is planted in winter/spring in rotation with rice, while rain fed maize is planted in summer in rotation with winter crops (wheat, oilseeds or pulses). Only the latter category, which is a minor part of the maize crop grown in Nepal, was affected by last summer’s dry spell. In Banke and Bardiya, rainfed maize is cultivated upland and therefore the flood damage on maize remained limited.
Millet is generally planted late in the Hills as a relay crop after maize and as a main crop in the Mountains and was therefore not affected by the dry spell of the summer of 2006, and production was average (Table 4).
|Eastern Mountains||25 260||43 604||1.73||39 065||69 448||1.78||14 245||15 175||1.07|
|Eastern Hills||78 882||176 791||2.24||141 779||271 603||1.92||49 079||52 188||1.06|
|Eastern Terai||326 702||863 942||2.64||47 900||111 750||2.33||6 225||6 255||1.00|
|Eastern Region||430 844||1 084 337||2.52||228 744||452 800||1.98||69 549||73 618||1.06|
|Central Mountains||17 605||42 206||2.40||28 740||62 397||2.17||24 125||24 195||1.00|
|Central Hills||87 907||278 666||3.17||138 098||292 542||2.12||37 351||40 316||1.08|
|Central Terai||295 400||789 777||2.67||42 129||106 636||2.53||4 288||4 350||1.01|
|Central Region||400 912||1 110 649||2.77||208 967||461 575||2.21||65 764||68 861||1.05|
|Western Mountains||0||0||-||691||1 145||1.66||7||7||1.00|
|Western Hills||128 393||306 707||2.39||198 695||452 301||2.28||94 454||106 546||1.13|
|Western Terai||183 370||430 455||2.35||11 810||29 042||2.46||750||730||0.97|
|Western Region||311 763||737 162||2.36||211 196||482 488||2.28||95 211||107 283||1.13|
|Mid-Western Mountains||6 790||11 844||1.74||9 252||13 690||1.48||8 397||8 355||0.99|
|Mid-Western Hills||46 011||116 898||2.54||104 174||198 662||1.91||12 339||13 936||1.13|
|Mid-Western Terai||99 541||265 976||2.67||44 100||92 385||2.09||135||135||1.00|
|Mid-Western Region||152 342||394 718||2.59||157 526||304 737||1.93||20 871||22 426||1.07|
|Far-Western Mountains||12 608||22 518||1.79||10 540||16 929||1.61||6 400||5 675||0.89|
|Far-Western Hills||26 517||54 790||2.07||21 028||37 003||1.76||6 963||6 570||0.94|
|Far-Western Terai||104 539||276 665||2.65||22 400||43 393||1.94||402||380||0.95|
|Far-Western Region||143 664||353 973||2.46||53 968||97 325||1.80||13 765||12 625||0.92|
|Mountains||62 263||120 172||1.93||88 288||163 609||1.85||53 174||53 407||1.00|
|Hills||367 710||933 852||2.54||603 774||1 252 111||2.00||200 186||219 556||1.00|
|Terai||1 009 552||2 626 815||2.60||168 339||383 205||2.27||11 800||11 850||1.00|
|Nepal||1 439 525||3 680 838||2.56||860 401||1 798 925||2.09||265 160||284 813||1.07|
The impact of the 2006 summer dry spell and floods on pulses and oilseeds could not be assessed but it is likely that the impact was limited as these crops are mainly cultivated during the winter in the Terai or intercropped (pulses) during the summer season with maize in the Hills.
The impact of the 2006 summer dry spell and floods on cash crops could not be assessed, but it is likely that the impact was limited as cash crops are mainly cultivated on irrigated land. Furthermore, it is likely that the floods that affected Banke and Bardiya districts had limited impact as cash crops are generally grown during the winter in these areas.
The impact of the winter 2005/06 drought and summer 2006 dry spell on livestock could not be assessed. Although there are anecdotal reports of losses of livestock in the Karnali region following the 2005/06 drought, the MoAC data suggests that the impact was marginal.
With average and above-average rainfall from October to December 2006, soil moisture was generally good for winter crop germination and growth. The levels of pests and diseases remained normal during the cropping season 2006/07. Yellow rust on winter wheat was reported in Taplejung and Tanahu districts. Yellow rust may possibly have affected those crops for which farmers used their own seeds for this winter cropping season. During the 2006/07 cropping season, the use of fertilizers and farmyard manure remained average. In the Hills, supply was reported problematic mainly for vegetable producers while in the Mountains fertilizer use remained marginal and farmyard manure application was average.
The use of improved seeds remained average for paddy and maize while a shortage of high quality improved seeds was reported for wheat in the Hills due to lower than average yield on seed farms during the winter of 2005/06. A higher proportion of farmers used their own wheat seeds for the winter 2006/07 cropping season. The supply and distribution of improved seeds is anticipated to be normal for the 2007/08 crop season for all cereal crops.
Wheat and barley production
The prospects for wheat and barley crops are above average due to timely and sufficient rainfall in winter 2006/07. An increase of 7 percent in production is expected compared to the five-year average (Table 5). There are pockets of lower production in the food insecure Mid-Western Hills (Rukum, Rolpa, Pyuthan, Dailekh and Jajarkot districts) and in the Far-Western Hills (Bajura district).
|Eastern Mountains||6 600||11 388||1.73||475||689||1.45||12 077||10.5|
|Eastern Hills||28 100||50 660||1.80||1 464||1 277||0.87||51 937||5.3|
|Eastern Terai||94 330||185 073||1.96||99||49||0.50||185 122||-1.8|
|Eastern Region||129 030||247 120||1.92||2 038||2 015||0.99||249 135||0.1|
|Central Mountains||14 815||25 593||1.73||496||627||1.26||26 220||7.0|
|Central Hills||52 340||117 434||2.24||1 607||1 853||1.15||119 287||5.1|
|Central Terai||147 275||328 909||2.23||477||679||1.42||329 588||4.3|
|Central Region||214 430||471 937||2.20||2 580||3 159||1.22||475 096||4.7|
|Western Mountains||940||1 534||1.63||618||834||1.35||2 368||-5.2|
|Western Hills||60 860||116 055||1.91||3 585||3 963||1.11||120 018||2.2|
|Western Terai||79 330||178 992||2.26||233||281||1.21||179 273||9.2|
|Western Region||141 130||296 581||2.10||4 435||5 078||1.14||301 659||6.2|
|Mid-Western Mountains||12 565||18 142||1.44||6 602||8 343||1.26||26 485||27.0|
|Mid-Western Hills||67 970||109 398||1.61||5 113||5 625||1.10||115 023||-6.0|
|Mid-Western Terai||44 950||108 388||2.41||51||86||1.69||108 474||20.4|
|Mid-Western Region||125 485||235 928||1.88||11 767||14 054||1.19||249 982||7.2|
|Far-Western Mountains||17 330||29 278||1.69||3 744||4 177||1.12||33 455||15.8|
|Far-Western Hills||36 400||60 495||1.66||1 213||1 879||1.55||62 374||20.9|
|Far-Western Terai||49 350||115 880||2.35||156||219||1.40||116 099||32.1|
|Far-Western Region||103 080||205 653||2.00||5 113||6 276||1.23||211 928||25.8|
|Mountains||52 250||85 934||1.64||11 935||14 670||1.23||100 604||12.3|
|Hills||245 670||454 042||1.85||12 982||14 598||1.12||468 640||3.2|
|Terai||415 235||917 242||2.21||1 017||1 314||1.29||918 556||8.5|
|Nepal||713 155||1 457 218||2.04||25 934||30 582||1.18||1 487 800||7.0|
Table 6 shows the aggregate production situation for major food crops in 2006/07. It shows that the loss of major summer crop in 2006 is partly made up by the expected increase in 2007 winter crops. The total food crop production in cereal equivalent, including potato, is forecast at 6.35 million tonnes, 3.4 percent below the previous year’s production and 1 percent lower compared to the average of the previous five years. Most reductions took place in Eastern Terai (14 percent), Central Terai (8 percent), and Western Mountains (5 percent), as noted earlier.
|Region/Zone||Cereal production in 2006/07 (tonnes)||
% of total
|Eastern Mountain||28 343||69 448||15 175||11 388||689||22 944||147 986||99.9||105.7|
|Eastern Hills||114 914||271 603||52 188||50 660||1 277||51 724||542 366||96.3||102.9|
|Eastern Terai||561 562||111 750||6 255||185 073||49||68 001||932 690||84.2||85.8|
|Central Mountain||27 434||62, 397||24 195||25 593||627||17 776||158 022||99.4||102.1|
|Central Hills||181 133||292 542||40 316||117 434||1 853||62 680||695 958||99.1||100.3|
|Central Terai||513 355||106 636||4 350||328 909||679||59 287||1 013 217||94.8||91.8|
|Western Mountain||0||1 145||7||1 534||834||2 045||5 565||96.4||94.9|
|Western Hills||199 360||452 301||106 546||116 055||3 963||30 036||908 261||97.9||106.4|
|Western Terai||279 796||29 042||730||178 992||281||16 262||505 103||100.5||98.4|
|Mid-Western Mountain||7 699||13 690||8 355||18 142||8 343||8 124||64 352||112.9||110.4|
|Mid-Western Hills||75 984||198 662||13 936||109 398||5 625||15 377||418 983||102.9||106.4|
|Mid-Western Terai||172 884||92 385||135||108 388||86||14 090||387 968||94.5||102.2|
|Far-Western Mountain||14 637||16 929||5 675||29 278||4 177||3 636||74 332||108.2||106.6|
|Far-Western Hills||35 613||37 003||6 570||60 495||1 879||5 665||147 226||111.1||111.4|
|Far-Western Terai||179 832||43 393||380||115 880||219||11 000||350 704||110.4||115.1|
|Eastern Region||704 819||452 800||73 618||247 120||2 015||142 669||1 623 041||89.2||92.5|
|Central Region||721 922||461 575||68 861||471 937||3 159||139 744||1 867 198||96.8||95.7|
|Western Region||479 155||482 488||107 283||296 581||5 078||48 344||1 418 929||98.8||103.4|
|Mid-Western Region||256 566||304 737||22 426||235 928||14 054||37 592||871 303||99.6||104.8|
|Far-Western Region||230 082||97 325||12 625||205 653||6 276||20 301||572 261||110.3||113.0|
|Nepal||2 392 545||1 798 925||284 813||1 457 218||30 582||388 649||6 352 732||96.6||99.0|
With a steady growth in population and food requirements during the last two decades on the one hand, and slow and fluctuating growth in cereal production on the other, Nepal has been a net cereal importer for most years during in the last two decades.
The projected supply/demand balance for the marketing year 2006/07 at national level is summarized in Table 7. Table 8 presents the cereal self-sufficiency situation in 2006/07 by five development regions and 15 sub-regions.
The assumptions on consumption and utilization parameters are noted in Table 7. Total cereal (including potato in cereal equivalent) availability at the national level is estimated at 7.59 million tonnes, with 6.35 million tonnes of production and 1.24 million tonnes of opening stocks. Total cereal utilization is projected at 7.82 million tonnes. Cereal deficit at the national level is estimated at 225 000 tonnes, compared to 23 000 tonnes in the previous year.
It is very difficult to estimate commercial imports due to the long border and informal trade with India. However, the food deficits in urban/Central Hills (280 700 tonnes in Table 8), in Eastern Terai (7 100 tonnes), in Central Terai (113 100 tonnes), and in Western Terai (12 400 tonnes) are expected to be met to a large extent by commercial imports through formal and informal trade (more than 110 600 tonnes) and some 300 000 tonnes by domestic purchases.3
Due to the lack of purchasing power and food access (discussed in the following section), the cereal requirements of vulnerable groups will not be fully translated into demand. The total food aid requirement is estimated at 114 400 tonnes, including 1 400 tonnes in Western Mountains, 19 200 tonnes in Mid-Western Mountains, 31 000 tonnes in Far-Western Mountains, and 62 800 tonnes in Far-Western Hills. Among them, the Nepal Food Corporation (NFC) supplied 38 000 tonnes in 2006, and is expected to provide around 20 000 tonnes in 2007. WFP is expected to provide 81 786 tonnes under its emergency programme, 33 517 tonnes under its country programme, and 39 405 tonnes for food assistance to conflict-affected people. Therefore, an uncovered deficit of around 12 614 tonnes remains.
Compared to total cereal production, per capita production in 2006/07 has declined more significantly from the average, as shown in Table 9 and Figure 2, reflecting the fast population growth. At the national average, per capita cereal output fell by 17 kg per person or 7.4 percent over the average of the previous five years. In terms of the size of the deficit, the highest deficits in 2006/07 a in the Central region (281 000 tonnes in Hills and 113 000 tonnes in Terai) as a result of a large total and urban population. However, on a per-capita basis, the food grain deficit areas are concentrated in the Hills and Mountains of the Far- and Mid-West. Five groups of regions are in severe cereal deficit. Besides the Central Hills (with per capita 146 kg) which includes the Kathmandu valley, the other four include the Far-West Hills (142 kg/person), Far-West Mountains (143 kg/person), Mid-West Mountains (158 kg/person), and Western Mountains (165 kg/person). Per capita cereal production is much lower than the national average (209 kg) and the minimum requirement (203 Kg).
Food deficit has been a long-term problem in Far- and Mid-West Hills and Mountains. The five-year average per capita food production by group and region (Table 9) show the same pattern as for 2006/07, i.e. food deficit is indeed a chronic food insecurity problem; production is grossly inadequate while economic access to food is limited by low purchasing power. Due to the mountainous terrain and limited or no road infrastructure in this area, markets are almost non-existent. As imports of food grains to these areas are mostly limited to subsidized rice distributions through NFC, food aid and small quantities carried by returning migrant labourers, local food production plays a critical role in the region’s food security. Local crop failures due to drought, hailstorms or landslides can thus seriously affect food availability and be the cause of acute local food crises.
There are 13 districts with per capita cereal production less than 150 kg (Figure 3). From lowest to highest, the districts are Kathmandu, Humla, Lalitpur, Bajura, Achham, Dolakha, Bhaktapur, Mahottari, Kalikot, Baitadi, Bajhang, Dolpa, and Rautahat. There are a further 14 districts with per capita cereal production between 150 kg and 180 kg (Figure 4).
|Total availability||2 692.5||2 178.9||284.8||2 017.2||30.6||388.6||7 592.7|
|Opening stocks||300.0||380.0||560.0||1 240.0|
|Production||2 392.5||1 798.9||282.8||1 457.2||30.6||388.6||6 352.7|
|Total utilization||2 906.3||2 178.9||295.7||2 017.2||30.6||388.6||7 817.4|
|Food use2/||2 354.8||1 243.2||264.6||1 164.2||24.4||319.8||5 371.0|
|Feed and other uses5/||9.4||310.0||61.8||381.2|
|Closing stock||300.0||380.0||560.0||1 240.0|
|Anticipated commercial imports||105.7||4.9||110.6|
|Expected WFP food aid||81.8|
|Expected NFC food aid||20.0|
|Central Terai||1 013.2||101.3||32.6||931.6||60.8||1 126.3||-113.1|
|Eastern Region||1 623.0||162.3||47.8||1 210.4||97.4||1 517.8||105.2|
|Central Region||1 867.2||186.7||54.3||1 903.0||112.0||2 256.1||-388.9|
|Western Region||1 418.9||141.9||37.8||1 040.1||85.1||1 304.9||114.0|
|Nepal||6 352.7||635.3||190.0||5 371.0||381.2||6 577.4||-224.6|
The role of trade policy in domestic cereal prices
Under the Nepal-India Trade Treaty, trade in primary agricultural products is free of customs duty on a reciprocal basis. There are no quantitative restrictions either. However, in the case of cereals and many other food and agricultural products, Nepal levies some taxes at the border. For 2006/07, there is an agricultural development duty of 8 percent and a 1.5 percent local development tax. In the case of cereals, the effective tax is much lower, some 5-6 percent rather than the 9.5 percent since the import valuation used is often lower than actual import price.
In the context of this report, the relevant issue is the role that these taxes play in influencing the prices and supply of cereals in Nepal particularly during the drought periods. Based on interviews with traders, the Mission confirmed that during drought periods, traders did not encounter any obstacles to restrict cereal imports from India, and thus markets were supplied with cereals as per demand.
As duties are fairly low, what would be more important than tariffs are trade facilitation measures in case of future food shortages. There are many such measures, ranging from reaching a political understanding with the government of India for facilitating this trade to simplifying customs and transport procedures and availing credit to traders. Traders interviewed were confident that given Nepal’s needs in such events, relative to what is available in the Indian markets, supplying Nepal’s markets with cereals should not be an issue. There are serious problems of course when it comes to access to food by vulnerable population groups, including in the Terai, and supplies to the Mountains regions. In both cases, markets are of limited value.
Figure 5 indicates that the monthly price of coarse rice, the major cereal staple in Nepal, has been relatively stable in recent years. The regional markets taken for the assessment in the Terai are Morang in the east, Chitwan in the centre, and Banke in the Mid-West, while Indian markets that were selected are in Bihar and Uttar Pradesh which have long borders with Nepal. The prices in Morang and Banke markets are relatively stable related to those in Indian markets, but with more variation, especially in Chitwan in the Central region, reflecting the local food supply and conflict situations.
Nepal has been a net importer (formal and informal trade) of rice in recent years. As indicated in the chart, the prices and market situation in the bordering Indian markets have a significant role in determining market price for crops in Nepal. The rice market system in the country is integrated in terms of association of price movements among the regional markets in Terai and with the adjoining Indian markets. The agricultural market study (WFP/FAO, 2006) also indicated that there is no strong relationship between the cost of production and market prices. These are foremost governed by Indian market prices, except for some specific varieties produced in Nepal.
Market integration/isolation among ecological zones
Figures 6 to 8 present the monthly average rice prices from 2004/05 to 2006/07 in three different development regions for a comparison of markets in Terai, Hills, and Mountains within the same region from south to north.
Two Figures in the Eastern region and Mid-Western region show a similar situation for prices in the three different ecological zones. The prices in Terai markets and Hills markets are very closely related for the whole three-year period. However, the rice prices in Mountains markets are consistently much higher, indicating the short supply and isolation of markets. Compared to the differences in the Eastern region and Mid-Western region, the rice price difference between Terai and Mountains in the Central region is much smaller, but the difference between Terai and Hills is large. On average during the three years, the rice price in mountain market is 177 percent over that in Terai markets in the Mid-Western region, 123 percent higher in the Eastern region, and 37 percent higher in the Central region. When comparing prices in Hills markets with prices in Terai markets, there is a 1 percent difference in the Mid-Western region, a 3 percent difference in the Eastern region, and an 18 percent difference in the Central region.
The higher rice prices are determined by the degree of the food deficit (as discussed in the section above) in the Mountain region and most of all by road conditions and transportation costs.
Access to infrastructure and services
Communities in the Mountain region significantly lag behind the other regions regarding access to infrastructure and services. Even small, “local” markets are not easily accessible in the mountain communities. Nearly three-quarters of the mountain settlements reported having to walk 24 hours or more to reach the nearest all-weather road. That compares to only 5 percent of settlements in the Hills and zero percent in the Terai (WFP, 2000). For some communities in Humla, the nearest markets were as far as four to five days’ walking distance. The government is unable to provide subsidized food grain in this region. Poor infrastructure and high transportation costs are the major causes of the high market prices and food insecurity.
Conflict-related factors affecting agricultural marketing
At present Nepal is facing an unprecedented crisis in its modern history. The armed rebellion started by the Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist) in February 1996 in the four Western Hill districts of Nepal later expanded all over the country. Agriculture is one of the sectors of the economy which is hard hit by the armed conflict in Nepal in terms of production, processing and marketing. The conflict has created significant problems in agricultural markets in both rural and urban areas (WFP/FAO, AMS Field Survey, 2006). Seventy-six percent of respondents reported specific problems related to the functioning of agricultural storage, transportation and marketing in their areas, due to blockades and strikes. Telecommunication and transport infrastructures (roads, bridges, civil aviation towers, suspension bridges, etc.) have been the major targets in the past decade. Both the security forces and the rebels have obstructed food marketing within their areas of influence.
Based on 2003/04 NLSS data, per capita expenditure is estimated at US$266 (current value) per year (Table 10). There is a big disparity in expenditures between urban and rural residents, with US$158 in rural and US$553 in urban areas. Poverty is significantly higher in rural areas compared to the cities. Annual per capital expenditure in the rural Far-West is extremely low (only US$133). The study of Small Area Estimation (SAE) carried out by CBS, WFP and the World Bank indicates that 37 percent of the rural population is living below the poverty line of 7 696 rupees (or US$101) per year, compared to 13 percent in urban areas. Based on the SAE, the proportion of population below the poverty line is much higher in the Mountains (42.5 percent) among three ecological zones (36.6 percent in Hills and 29.5 percent in Terai) and in the Far-West (45.6 percent) and Mid-West (46.5 percent) among the five development regions. People living in the Mountains spend more on food (65 percent) then those living in the Hills (55.4 percent) and Terai (51.7 percent).
|Annual per capita expenditure1/||
Share of food
|In current NRs||In current US$||%||%|
Food insecurity in the surplus areas of the Terai and Lower Hills is foremost an issue of food access. Although the incidence of poverty in these areas is generally lower than in the Hills and Mountains of the Far- and Mid-West, the concentration of poverty (as measured by the number of poor people per square kilometre) is very high (see map that follows).
Due to high poverty levels, people have limited purchasing power to buy food in the markets. Based on the Mission’s observations, the income inequality is likely to be higher in the Terai than in the Hills and Mountains. Vulnerable communities such as Dalits, Adivasi Janajatis and Kamayas often struggle to access sufficient food. The result is that the Terai is characterized by very high wasting levels above emergency levels (see next section). Unfortunately, no disaggregated data are currently available that provide insight in the food security situation of marginalized communities in the Terai. Other important factors contributing to food insecurity and malnutrition in the Terai remains high include limited nutritional knowledge, inappropriate hygiene and caring practices, and the gender division within the household, which places women in a disadvantaged position.
Farm income is still a dominant source for the rural population, especially households living in the Mountains and households in lower income groups. According to 2003/04 NLSS data, 48 percent of household income comes from farm income, 28 percent from non-farm income, 11 percent from remittance, 10 percent from housing consumption and 4 percent from other sources (Table 11). However, for households living in the Mountains, 59 percent of household income is from agriculture only 19 percent from non-farm income and 9 percent from remittances. Similarly, the poorest and second poorest groups, based on consumption quintiles, are also highly dependent on farm income (62 percent and 58 percent, respectively), while remittances are lower (8 percent and 9 percent) compared to the national average.
Undernourishment refers to the condition of people whose dietary energy consumption is continuously below a minimum dietary energy requirement for maintaining a healthy life and carrying out light physical activity.
Mean per capita dietary
Below 1 810
Below 1 910
Below 2 124
With assistance from CBS, the Mission calculated the mean dietary energy consumption (DEC) and its coefficient of variation (CV) and undernourishment situation at national and sub-national levels by using NLSS 2003/04 data.
At national level, per capita mean dietary energy consumption is estimated at 2 405 kcal/per person/day (Table 12). The figure in 2003/04 varied considerably across different parts of the country, ranging from a low of 2 250 kcal in rural Far-Western region to 2 534 kcal in rural Western region. In terms of mean dietary energy consumption across the belts of Nepal, the Mountain belt has the lowest consumption level at 2 297, compared to 2 402 kcal in the Hills and 2 426 kcal in the Terai.
The proportion of undernourished population in Nepal depends on the criteria in defining the minimum requirement of dietary energy consumption (MRDEC). This report estimated the proportion by using three alternative criteria based on existing studies (2 124 kcal/person/day,4 1 910 kcal/person/day,5 and 1 810 kcal/person/day6) and the results are also presented in Table 12. The results show a marked difference depending on which of the requirements is used. If the CBS criterion (2 124 kcal) is used, as many as 40.7 percent of the population in Nepal lives below the MRDEC in 2003/04. At the aggregate level, the proportion of undernourished population is highest in the Mid-Western region (48.5 percent), followed by the Far-Western region (47.5 percent), while the Western region has the lowest undernourishment (33 percent). Across the belts, the Mountains have the highest undernourishment, at 46.3 percent, compared with 41.8 percent in the Hills and 38.4 percent in the Terai belt.
Although the proportion under different MRDECs is sensitive to the selection of the criterion, it can be concluded that the shares of population under severe deficit of food energy intakes are very high in the Rural Mountains and Hills, especially in the Mid- and Far- Western regions. Figure 9 provides more detailed information about the population distribution with different food energy intake levels for 15 groups. The figures indicate that food consumption in the Mid-Western Mountains and Far-Western Hills are in a crisis situation with more than 30 percent and 20 percent, respectively, of the rural population consuming less than 1 600 kcal per day, which is substantially lower than the international minimum dietary energy consumption requirement.
According to the WHO classification (WHO, 1997) for prevalence of malnutrition, the malnutrition situation in Nepal is at crisis level. During the period 1995-2002, Nepal ranked last among 177 countries (tied with Bangladesh) in terms of the proportion of children classified as underweight (UNDP, 2004). Nonetheless, aggregated malnutrition indicators at the national level show that the nutrition status of children has improved slightly over the past five years (2001-2006). Stunting levels decreased slightly from 51 percent to 49 percent and proportion of underweight from 48 percent to 39 percent. On the other hand, wasting, an indicator of acute malnutrition, increased from 10 to 13 percent (DHS, 2006).
Considerable geographic variation in the incidence of malnutrition can be observed. Detailed malnutrition maps were published by CBS/WFP/WB in September 2006 (see Maps 1-3). The highest incidence of stunting and underweight is found in the Mountains and Hills areas of the Far- and Mid-Western development region, where more than 60 percent of children are stunted and 50 percent are underweight. Limited availability of food and high poverty rates provide an explanation for these high stunting and underweight rates.
In the Terai, on average 17 percent of children suffer wasting. The percentage of affected children in the Far-Western and Central Terai is as high as 20 percent and 21 percent, respectively. Factors such as differences in the status of women in society, poor eating habits related to lack of knowledge about nutrition, poor caring and hygiene practices and a higher percentage of households without any access to land compared to the Hills and Mountain areas are possible explanations for these high levels of wasting in the Terai.
UNICEF and Action Contre La Faim (ACF) have conducted independent nutrition surveys in selected districts, including those affected by drought and adverse weather conditions. Preliminary results from a UNICEF survey show that in Bajura, 72 percent of children are stunted and 70 percent are underweight. For Jumla, the preliminary estimates are even worse, with 82.3 percent of children stunted and 77 percent underweight. Wasting levels recorded for these districts are very high, at 11.5 and 14.1 percent respectively. An ACF survey conducted in Bajhang in January 2007 estimates the chronic malnutrition rate at 59.2 percent.
Factors that contribute to this very poor malnutrition situation include:
Inability of households to acquire sufficient and nutritious food.
Lack of general education and nutrition knowledge of care providers combined with improper hygiene and caring practices.
Poor access to health services and the limited medical support available. (The Mission visited a sub-health post in Humla. This particular post receives medical supplies once a year and generally runs out of medicine after two months.)
Two-thirds of households do not have toilet facilities (Comprehensive Food Security and Vulnerability Analysis - CFSVA).
Access to safe water remains a concern. Forty-four percent of all households rely on public taps. In the Terai, 77 percent of households use tubewells or boreholes as their primary source of drinking water (CFSVA).
A WFP survey conducted in January 2007 in the drought-affected areas included mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) measurements. The results indicate malnutrition rates of more than 53 percent and a further 24.1 percent of children at risk of becoming malnourished. This same survey also investigated consumption patterns of people in drought-affected and non-drought-affected areas in the Hills and Mountains of the Far- and Mid-West. It becomes clear that in general people in this area do not follow a diet that is rich in proteins, vitamins and minerals. Fish, meat, eggs and fresh fruit are rarely consumed. The survey shows that in areas affected by drought, consumption pattern sharply deteriorate. For example, lentils/pulses, traditionally part of the Nepali diet, were not consumed by more than 50 percent of households within seven days prior to the survey as compared to about 12 percent in non-drought-affected areas. A similar reduction in intake of green vegetables was observed.
These figures indicate a high level of coping intensity and significant impact on health and nutrition in the localized areas that are affected by drought and other external shocks. Given that migration to India is often not a viable coping strategy, alternative income opportunities are non-existent and markets are not functioning in these areas, external support and income transfers in the form of food aid can be justified. Immediate food aid will secure the families’ food needs, prevent further deterioration in their livelihoods and reduce long-term suffering.
Area and population groups affected or likely to be affected by extreme weather conditions
Although the overall winter crop production has been positive, there remain several areas in the Far- and Mid-West of Nepal which have been severely affected by drought, hailstorm, late snowfall, excessive rainfall and/or pests. Due to these factors, local production was severely affected, with consequent implications for household food security. The WFP Food Security Monitoring and Analysis System has identified areas of concern. They include the southern part of Baitadi, Bajura, the southern tip of Humla, and the northern parts of Kalikot Dailekh and Jajarkot. Detailed wheat crop situation maps for East and West Nepal were published in Issue 5 of the WFP Crop Situation Updates.
The map below combines the crop situation of the main summer crops (paddy, maize or millet) in October 2006 with the crop situation map for the main winter crop (wheat or barley) in March 2007 for areas with expectation of failed, very poor or poor crop production. The orange shaded areas show the condition of harvest loss estimations above 40 percent in both seasons. The yellow shaded areas indicate areas where during one season loss estimates were above 40 percent while in the other season they were between 20-40 percent. In other districts these conditions did not apply.
For an extended emergency operation, it is recommended that these areas be included where the local population has been confronted with subsequent harvest losses in addition to current highly food-insecure areas. A longer support operation would be preferable in which the key underlying factor of food insecurity – i.e. successive crop failure – in these communities would be mitigated through activities such as the construction or rehabilitation of irrigation facilities, introduction of rainwater harvesting techniques, improved water management, provision of appropriate seeds and the establishment of community seed banks.
Impact of adverse weather conditions on livelihoods, nutrition and health
During January 2007, WFP undertook a household survey that provides insights into the effects of drought and other adverse weather conditions on the local food security situation in affected areas (see Emergency Update, February 2007). The fragile food security situation in many rural areas becomes immediately apparent when looking at the results of this survey. Almost 94 percent of households responded that external shocks (drought, hailstorms, lack of employment, illness, landslides and death of family member) immediately result in household food shortage.
Within drought-affected areas, more than 85 percent of households claimed that the food shortages were more severe than last year and that the majority of households within these areas have depleted most of their food stocks. The survey estimates that in drought-affected areas, average household food grain stocks would be depleted within 15 days as compared to 3 months in non-drought-affected areas.
The resilience of a household to external shocks, such as drought and other adverse weather conditions, depends on its socio-economic status. Poor and socially excluded groups will be less able to absorb shocks than well-positioned and better-off households. The Far- and Mid-West regions in Nepal are generally considered as the poorest parts of the country, which would indicate a limited resilience to external shocks and thus a higher incidence of households using irreversible and damaging coping strategies, such as extensive borrowing and sales of productive assets.
The survey shows that almost all households (96.6 percent) in the drought-affected areas shifted their consumption to less preferred and expensive food. More than three-quarters had to borrow money for consumption purposes and almost 73 percent reduced their food intake. More worrying is the fact that half of the affected population had no meal at all at least one day a week and almost 37 percent relied on the collection of wild foods as a source of food. More than half of the households have one or more family members who have migrated in search of jobs. Irreversible coping strategies were also widespread, with over one-third of the households selling agricultural and household assets. A very high number of households (18.5 percent) reported sale of land.
Government policies and distribution of subsidized foods in the hills and mountain areas
The tenth five-year plan (2002-2007) provides an overarching framework for the different government policies and programmes. The key objective of the plan is to address poverty and target specific vulnerable groups such as Dalits, people from remote areas and women. Strategic objectives of the plan include broad-based economic growth, social sector and infrastructure development, targeted assistance and good governance.
In addition to food that the private sector (including households themselves) moves to the deficit Hill and Mountain areas, three other source channels are important, or could become important in the coming years. These are the public sector (NFC), WFP and NGOs. These would also be the main sources for supplying these areas in the event of future production shortfalls; hence their capacity to upscale operations is important for food security.
For many years, NFC has been for many years distributing food to these areas, for which the government provides transport subsidies. These operations are expensive because of the high cost of transport – the cost of transporting rice by air, for example, is typically four times the price of rice in the Terai. Therefore, the budget for subsidies severely limits the amount of food that NFC can supply. Indeed, NFC’s distribution to these areas amount to only 5-6 percent of the total deficits. Moreover, for a variety of reasons, NFC cereals do not necessarily reach the most needy households in the districts. In recent years, food distributions in remoter parts of the districts have been severely disrupted by the conflict situation, as food depots were closed. In 2006, NFC delivered approximately 38 000 tonnes of rice to the Hill and Mountain areas. Projected annual supply for 2007 is approximately 20 000 tonnes.
Ongoing food assistance programmes
Targeted food assistance programmes are implemented by the government with considerable financial and logistics support from WFP. The various modes of assistance include the following:
Provision of rural employment opportunities to the poor through the Rural Community Infrastructure Works Programme (RCIW). A total of 480 000 poor people benefit from food for work (FFW) projects each year, consisting of rural road construction and community-based projects such as irrigation and soil conservation structures, and income generation projects. FFW programmes cover 25 districts in Nepal. Due to funding constraints, some FFW activities have been rescheduled from the spring until the fall of 2007. Participants are targeted within a 2 km corridor from the planned rural road.
A Food for Education Programme directed at improving the nutritional status, school enrolment and attendance by children, particularly girls, by providing a mid-day meal and a take-home ration of oil for girl students. In total 3 600 schools across 18 districts are covered.
A Mother and Child Health initiative which aims to improve the health and nutritional status of pregnant and nursing mothers and their young children (aged 6 to 36 months) by providing essential nutritional food support in the form of a monthly take-home ration of fortified food. The programme now operates in 11 districts with average annual beneficiaries totalling 64 000.
Emergency assistance in natural disasters.
WFP currently provides emergency assistance to drought-affected communities in the Far- and Mid-Western areas of the country. So far, 375 000 households that had lost their harvest due to drought or other adverse weather conditions have benefited from a one-time support to carry them over to the next harvest. Given the repeated crop failure in several areas in the Far- and Mid-West, WFP is planning to extend its emergency assistance up to November 2007.
In addition, WFP Nepal is planning a protracted relief and recovery operation (PRRO) to provide food assistance to conflict-affected populations. The overall objective of the PRRO is to safeguard lives and livelihoods and contribute to peace and stability in Nepal during the post-conflict period by protecting and strengthening livelihoods and establishing conditions that promote the rehabilitation and restoration of self-reliance among food-insecure, conflict-affected populations. The PRRO aims to support 1 265 600 food-insecure beneficiaries.
Food security outlook
Food insecurity and hunger remain pervasive in Nepal, not only in food-deficit districts but also within marginalized communities in districts with surplus food production. Poverty intensity is high, and the success of the peace process – although some encouraging developments have taken place – remains uncertain. Agricultural productivity growth is limited, soil erosion is continuing and there are indications of climatic change towards more erratic weather conditions, with drought spells in one area combined with excessive rainfall in others. These factors point to worrying prospects for the food security situation in Nepal. An increase in agricultural productivity is a pre-requisite for development of the economy and therefore the central goal of the Agriculture Perspective Plan, which is officially the main framework for agricultural development. In addition, immediate improvements in the livelihoods of poor households are essential for the peace process to succeed. A longer-term support programme directed at the basic social and economic causes of the civil conflict is essential. High-visibility projects providing immediate assistance to poor and conflict-affected communities should be promoted and reintegration and reconciliation processes of ex-Maoist combatants and IDPS need to be supported.
Population affected and requiring assistance
Every year, the period from February to March – and even longer for communities at higher altitudes – is a season of severe hardship for many poor households. The main winter crops are in their growing stage and agricultural employment opportunities are very limited. Migration trends to urban centres and India tend to increase during this period. The intensity of household food insecurity is therefore much higher than during planting and harvesting periods. However, in the estimation of people at risk of food insecurity, these “normal” or chronically food-insecure households have not been included in the estimates below. These only include households whose food security status has deteriorated substantively because of an external shock that affected the areas, e.g. drought, landslide, hailstorm. Table 13 shows the variation, as estimated by WFP’s Food Security Monitoring and Analysis System, in the number of people at risk during the past six months. The number peaked during the February 2007 due to paddy crop failure in the Eastern Terai. Based on the latest field information from WFP’s Food Security Monitoring and Analysis System, the Mission estimates that about 40 500 people in the Far- and Mid-West require immediate emergency assistance. Their food security situation is acute and their livelihoods are severely compromised due to crop failures caused by either drought or hailstorms in these areas. A further 172 000 people are currently at risk of food insecurity. The food security situation of these households requires close monitoring, and assistance may be required if traditional coping mechanism are further compromised (see also Food Security Bulletin, Issue 17, forthcoming).
As the Mission recommended above, an extended emergency operation (EMOP) should target not only the areas currently classified as highly food-insecure but also include communities affected by subsequent crop losses through a more comprehensive FFW programme directed at mitigating the impacts of drought. These should include construction or repair of irrigation facilities, development of water harvesting facilities as well as provision of improved seed stocks.
Description of targeted population
Poor communities in the Far- and Mid-West should be targeted for external food assistance. These particular communities have suffered three subsequent crop losses due to drought. With yet another crop failure, they would mostly likely have been facing famine conditions had emergency food aid support not been provided over the past six months. The most vulnerable people within these drought-impacted communities are women, children and the elderly, who stay behind while the able-bodied men leave the villages in search of employment.
Quantification of the food gaps
The total food grain shortage is estimated at 225 000 tonnes. It is expected that about half of this shortage will be met by increased food grain imports (110 600 tonnes). The remaining gap of 114 400 tonnes should be met through food aid or government procurement. For 2007, the subsidized rice distributions to remote food-deficit districts are expected to amount to 20 000 tonnes.
Through an extension of WFP’s drought emergency operation, the most critically food insecure can be assisted. Table 13 provides current estimates of the number of people facing acute food insecurity and the number of people at risk of deteriorating food security as a consequence of an external shock that affected the area. As explained above, it does not include households that are chronically food insecure. Based on previous drought emergency support provided, a two-month food ration is sufficient to assist the most vulnerable population in meeting their most immediate needs during the critical months of July and August and carry them through to the next main harvest in November. To support approximately 40 500 acute food-insecure people in the areas hardest hit by drought requires approximately 1 215 tonnes of food grains.
Longer-term support (four months) through FFW interventions to cover 69 400 beneficiaries requires approximately 4 164 tonnes of food grains. These interventions would be directed at mitigating the impact of drought (e.g. rehabilitation or construction of irrigation facilities) to areas continuously affected by drought as identified in the map on page 31, and focusing only on the worst-affected areas.
The remaining food assistance to people at risk of food insecurity (chronic and acute) due to cereal shortages can be covered through a combination of programme options recommended in 5.5.
Acute food and
|I. Carnali belt|
|1||Kalikot||10 300||18 654||28 954|
|3||Humla||15 000||-||15 000|
|4||Dolpa||6 036||-||6 036|
|5||Mugu||4 650||-||4 650|
|Sub-total||35 986||18 654||54 640|
|II. Far Werstern Hills and Mountains|
|6||Bajura||1 200||1 500||2 700|
|Sub-total||1 200||1 500||2 700|
|III. Rapti Bheri Hills|
|11||Dailekh||14 324||-||14 324|
|12||Rukum||10 150||-||10 150|
|13||Jajarkot||52 080||20 370||72 450|
|Sub-total||76 554||20 370||96 924|
|IV. Central and Eastern Terai|
|14||Saptari||3 500||-||3 500|
|15||Siraha||5 000||-||5 000|
|16||Udayapur||49 538||-||49 538|
|Sub-total||58 038||-||58 038|
|Grand total||171 778||40 524||212 302|
An extension of the current EMOP in the Far- and Mid-Western regions is recommended to those areas that have been affected by drought in subsequent seasons and those that have been identified as being in a critically food-insecure phase. It is suggested that the modalities of the emergency operation could be modified and involve a somewhat longer period of assistance in which, through FFW activities, the underlying causes of food insecurity would be addressed. This would involve activities that are directed at construction or rehabilitation of irrigation facilities, rainfall water harvesting and improved water management, provision of improved seeds, and establishment of sanitation facilities.
The extended emergency operation would run from July to November and would be directed to the above identified areas. Estimated total tonnage requirement is 5 379 tonnes. This support would help the local population bridge the period until the next main harvest season in late October. The creation of local infrastructure would contribute to mitigating the impact of drought, thereby making the community more self-reliant and decreasing the need for future food aid support.
An immediate support programme is required to tackle the much larger problem of chronic food insecurity and the unacceptable high malnutrition rates. Persistently high levels of food insecurity may destabilize the peace process. It is therefore important that an immediate effort be set in place to improve household food security, poverty and the nutritional situation to prevent these basic causes of the conflict to destabilize the peace process. This would involve rehabilitation of critical infrastructure (irrigation, roads, bridges, health post, schools, etc.) through labour-intensive FFW programmes combined with basic awareness, vocational skills and nutrition training.
A longer-term programme directed at improving the nutrition situation is essential. This would involve a school feeding programme combined with nutrition education at primary schools and a mother and child health and nutrition programme directed at areas with high levels of wasted and underweight children, with lagging educational achievement indicators, such as girl enrolment and attendance.
Rehabilitation or construction of irrigation or water harvesting facilities requires establishing partnerships with technical agencies and investments in non-food items. The Mission witnessed the impact of new improved seeds provided as part of the WFP emergency support to the community in Sreenagar Village Development Committee (VDC) in Humla. Despite the drought condition prevailing in this VDC, the newly provided seeds are expected to give a much higher yield than the local seeds. Provision of improved seeds to drought-affected communities can therefore provide a demonstrable and longer-term impact and should be considered as part of the extended emergency assistance.
Logistically, Nepal is one of the most challenging countries in the world. Most districts do not have any motorable roads and for many areas in the Far- and Mid-Western regions the options for food delivery are limited to air or mule transport. Costs of operations are very high, and for this reason the focus should be on designing and implementing projects with a sustainable impact.
An extension of the current WFP emergency operation in the Far- and Mid-Western Region is recommended to those areas that have been affected by drought in subsequent seasons. This would target about 69 400 beneficiaries who have been severely affected by the continuing drought conditions in these areas as well as 40 500 people residing in other areas of the Far- and Mid-West who are currently confronted by severe food-insecurity conditions.
Total food aid requirements for four months of support are 5 379 tonnes. It is suggested that the modalities of the emergency operation would be modified to provide an extended period of assistance in which, through FFW activities, the underlying causes of food insecurity are addressed. This would involve activities that are directed at construction or rehabilitation of irrigation facilities, rainfall water harvesting and improved water management, provision of improved seeds, and establishment of sanitation facilities, amongst others.
An immediate support programme is required to tackle the much larger problem of chronic food insecurity and unacceptable high malnutrition rates. Persistent high levels of food insecurity may destabilize the peace process, and it is therefore important that an immediate effort be set in place to improve household food security, poverty and the nutrition situation to prevent these basic causes of the conflict to destabilize the peace process. This would involve rehabilitation of critical infrastructure (irrigation, roads, bridges, health post, schools, etc.) through labour-intensive FFW programmes combined with basic awareness, vocational and nutrition training. In addition, high-visibility projects providing an immediate assistance to poor and conflict affected communities should be promoted and reintegration and reconciliation processes of ex-Maoist combatants and IDPs need to be supported.
The Mission underlines the importance of closely monitoring vulnerability factors such as food insecurity, malnutrition, unemployment, land issues, migration and health care that could jeopardize the peace process, in order to address emerging issues with timely and targeted interventions.
A longer-term programme directed at improving the nutrition situation is essential. This would involve a school feeding programme combined with nutrition education at primary schools and a mother and child health and nutrition programme directed at areas with high levels of wasted and underweight children.
Regular crop monitoring is an essential element in monitoring the food security situation and designing timely and targeted interventions. This is because of the fragile food security situation, practice and importance of subsistence farming in rural communities, dependency on rainfall due to limited irrigation facilities and absence of markets in most of the high Hills and Mountain districts. In this regard, the crop monitoring system of MoAC should be strengthened.
The Mission recommends closer collaboration between WFP and NFC, particularly in improving the targeting mechanism used by the latter. WFP operates an extensive food security monitoring system that provides detailed information on food needs. In utilizing this information, NFC targeting could be improved, thereby ensuring that food reaches those most in need.
The Mission also recommends a further comprehensive study investigating seasonal migration patterns and its benefits as a coping strategy for contributing to achieving household food security during the lean periods.
Agricultural policy reforms implemented during the past ten years have led to a significant withdrawal of government involvement in pricing and marketing of agricultural products and inputs. The underlying reasoning is that agricultural support services are to be provided mainly by the private sector in partnership with the government, hence the concept of “public-private partnership”. Inputs and services like seeds and fertilizers as well as extension and animal health services are to be provided mainly by the private sector. A second important pillar of the policy environment being put in place is the organization of farmers into groups for a variety of purposes, such as for the delivery of credit and irrigation management. The Agricultural Perspective Plan (APP) places significant importance on commercialization of agriculture.
The importance of a pro-poor approach to agricultural development is being recognized. Pro-poor and Agriculture Programs was the heading of the chapter in the Budget Speech of July 2006, in which agricultural and poverty-related policies were addressed. In this policy statement, it was acknowledged that there is a widespread concern among people that the benefits of past economic reform programmes did not reach the poor. Pro-poor programmes and investment in rural areas were considered essential. Recently, the government also launched a new initiative called the One-Village-One-Product programme, under which public-private partnership will be exploited to raise production of selected commodities with adequate export potential. The products selected are mostly traditional fruits and speciality products popular in different areas of Nepal.
The sections that follow discuss issues on agricultural inputs and services, vital for the modernization of agriculture, commercialization and its pro-poor orientation. Efforts are made to relate the discussion to the recent drought, and to what may be done in these areas in the event of similar droughts in the future.
Low productivity and lack of competitiveness of agricultural products are the growing problems of poverty and food insecurity in Nepal. Comparisons between levels of rice and wheat productivities in the ecological zones of Nepal and neighbouring South Asian countries are presented in Figures 11 and 12. Although the rice yield in Nepal has been increasing gradually since 1990, the growth rate is much lower, compared to neighbouring countries. From 1990 to 2005, the rice yield increased by 13 percent in Nepal, compared to 47 percent in Bangladesh, 37 percent in Pakistan and 20 percent in India. As a result, the rice yield in Nepal is 7 percent, 8 percent, 11 percent and 22 percent below that of Pakistan, India, Sri Lanka, and Bangladesh, respectively, based on the average from 2001 to 2005. The Terai is the dominant rice producer of Nepal, with a higher growth and high level of yield relative to the Mountains and Hills zones. However, the rice yield in Terai is still lower than those of neighbouring countries.
Compared to rice, the wheat yield in Nepal has grown faster (47 percent increase from 1990 to 2005). However, the wheat yield in Nepal is much lower relative to India (25 percent lower) and Pakistan (15 percent lower) based on the five-year average from 2001 to 2005. The wheat yield per hectare in the Mountains and Hills in 2005 was 1.57 tonnes and 1.90 tonnes, respectively, compared to 2.25 tonnes in Terai.
Soil erosion is a common feature in the Hills and Mountains. Use of fertilizer and pesticides is limited and there is an urgent need for investment in seeds research and supply and in the coverage of irrigation facilities.
All fertilizers used in Nepal are imported. For many years, fertilizer prices were subsidized until subsidies were eliminated in 1999. One important reason for removing the subsidies was that the binding constraint to increase use of fertilizers in Nepal was not the price of fertilizer but the supply itself, which in turn is limited to the amount of subsidies. Two effects of the subsidy removal have been prominent: i) an increase in the overall supply of fertilizers, with declines in formal imports more than offset by increased informal imports from India; and ii) increases in fertilizer prices in Nepal, which is inevitable when subsidies are eliminated.
On the first point, the overall picture is not very clear because reliable statistics are lacking on the volume of informal imports. Formal trade, reported in government statistics, show total supply of about 150 000 tonnes in recent years, about 30 percent imported by the Agricultural Inputs Company and 70 percent by private traders. The overall picture based only on these data is indeed discouraging as fertilizer use per hectare shows a declining trend (from 26 kg in 2003/04 to 21 kg in 2005/06).7
The picture appears very different, however, when estimates of the informal imports are taken into account. Table 14 shows estimates of total supply of fertilizers from formal and informal sources, the latter based on household surveys of fertilizer use. The data show that there has been a rapid increase of fertilizer supply in Nepal, from 224 000 tonnes in 1997/98 to 488 000 tonnes by 2002/03. Informal sources accounted for 60 percent of the total supply in 1997/98 and 80 percent in 2002/03. These values translate into fertilizer consumption of about 35 kg/ha (nutrient basis) for 1997/98 and about 60 kg/ha (nutrient basis) for 2000/01. Similar survey data are not available for recent years. But it is generally held that the informal source continues to be significant even now.
|Year||Formal sources||Informal sources||Total supplies|
|1997/98||89 000||135 000||224 000|
|1998/99||219 000||150 000||369 000|
|1999/00||154 000||233 000||387 000|
|2000/01||171 000||282 000||453 000|
|2001/02||147 000||278 000||425 000|
|2002/03||101 000||387 000||488 000|
The main reason why informal trade accounts for such a large share of total supply is that fertilizers are subsidized in India; thus, following the removal of subsidies in Nepal, fertilizer prices in Nepal are much higher than in India, exactly double in the case of Urea (Figure 13).
There are some issues regarding the fertilizer sector. The most important is perhaps the issue of reliability of the informal source. As noted above, it is mainly the informal source that has boosted fertilizer use in Nepal to about 60 kg/ha (nutrient), compared to about 90 kg/ha (nutrient) in India. However, the export of fertilizer is restricted in India in view of the subsidies and so this source cannot be taken as reliable for Nepal. Informal imports at lower prices are blamed in Nepal for undermining formal imports by Nepal’s private sector In addition, there are also complaints that informal sector fertilizers are at times of lower or dubious quality due to adulteration of some kind. Lastly, Nepalese officials routinely hear complaints from farmers that fertilizers are much more expensive in Nepal relative to India and thus agricultural competitiveness is undermined.
Informal imports – to the extent this is seen as a problem in Nepal – will shrink only when prices in India increase, following the reduction in fertilizer subsidies. In that event, it should not be a problem for Nepal’s private sector to expand its fertilizer operations.
Finally, in the context of the drought and its aftermath, the main question asked is: what else could the government do? One response could be to take extra measures to facilitate private trade in the aftermath of the drought so that the typically extra demand for inputs that follows the next crop season is supplied smoothly. This is the time to provide some subsidies and other assistance for transporting fertilizers to the production areas in the Hills and Mountains, where the private sector does not reach. Lastly, the government could provide targeted price subsidies to poor and marginal farming groups in affected areas, which is a provision in the National Fertilizer Policy 2002.
Unlike fertilizers, for which the overall supply and availability have improved in recent years, the situation in the seed sector is far from satisfactory. Although both government sources and various studies show that crop areas covered by improved seeds are very high, in the 80-90 percent range for cereals and vegetables, the problem of seed quality remains. The bulk of the seeds used are farmers’ own seeds from previous harvests or acquired from neighbours. These may be improved or high-yielding variety (HYV) seeds at the outset, but several seasons their quality degenerates. Thus, the primary problem is replacement of these old “improved” seeds with fresh “improved” ones. A seed replacement rate of 25 percent is considered desirable, which implies that improved seeds are replaced every four years before seeds degenerate beyond value. In contrast, the actual replacement rate is widely held to be only about 5 percent for wheat and even lower for rice and maize, although the exact situation is not known because of lack of statistics. Research claims that cereal production in Nepal can be raised by 20 percent simply by upgrading the quality of seeds.
The government policy is one of encouraging private-sector involvement in seed production and supply, and indeed the Mission found private-sector participation to be quite visible, both in the Hills and the Terai. The amount of seeds distributed by this sector – numerous private agro-vets and seed operators – is not known but is considered to be substantive.
NSC is also an important actor in the seeds sector. The company distributes quality seeds through many dealers. In 2004/05, NSC sold about 510 tonnes of paddy seeds, 2 237 tonnes of wheat seeds and 1 543 tonnes of maize seeds. In the first eight months of 2005/06, the company distributed 130 tonnes, 2 810 tonnes and 6 tonnes of paddy, wheat and maize seeds, respectively – far below targets in the case of paddy and maize seeds. The reasons given for this less than satisfactory performance include failure to collect adequate seeds of good quality from farmers as per the contracts and the influx of low-quality seeds from India across the long and porous border, which discouraged private-sector activity. The amount supplied by the formal sector is very low. For example, according to an estimate ((Thapa et al, 2001)), supply by the formal sector amounted in 1999/2000 to as little as 1.7 percent of the national requirements for rice, 0.6 percent for maize and 11.3 percent for wheat.
The third important source of seed is imports from India. Seeds are brought by farmers and small traders across the porous border. These imports are not recorded and so it is not known how much seed is brought each season. However, there is consensus that this has been an important source of supply, especially around the border areas in the Terai. This is also the view of the Mission as observed during the field visits.
The government has taken the difficulties in the seeds sector seriously. A major programme being implemented is the District Seed Self-Sufficiency Programme (DISSPRO). DISSPRO was initiated by the District Agriculture Development Offices (DADOs), and encourages the production and marketing of good quality seeds by providing technical support to farmer groups. The programme covers 55 of the 75 districts in the country. This programme has been instrumental in spreading good-quality seeds through farmer-to-farmer informal exchange practice. Improved seeds are also informally imported from India and exchanged through informal farmer-to-farmer practice. These informal mechanisms supported by DISSPRO account for over 95 percent of the farmers’ seed use.
The main problem in the seeds sector, faced by both the private agro-vets and seed operators, as well as by DISSPRO, is the binding constraint in the availability of breeding seeds for multiplication. Capacity in government farms, the only official source for such seeds, is limited by the size of the farm and other resources.8
Additional issues in the seed sector
One issue is the reliability and quality of seeds imported from India. These seeds are imported informally and so their quality is not assured, although it was reported during the Mission that farmers have a way of ascertaining quality suppliers, based on experience. There is a feeling that this “source” is reliable, given that Nepal’s needs are small, relative to what is available in India. Reliability is questioned, however, because India does not encourage exports of seeds, and may restrict these exports. These seeds are technically unauthorized in Nepal because their phytosanitary standard is not verified. Indeed, seeds can be used only if they are certified by Nepal’s research system. From these standpoints, this source is fully unauthorized and these seeds are grown only because informal trade is possible.
A second issue is the dissemination of improved seeds to interiors, i.e. to villages that are distant from market centres and roads, and notably to the Hills and Mountains. Seed markets, unlike those of cereals and vegetables, need to be developed, which require appropriate incentives and supports to private operators, as well as laws and regulations. There is a need for upgrading community-based seed growers into formal “village seed enterprises”. This will require technical assistance, mini-processing plants and linkage with local traders to support such enterprises. Simplified certification mechanisms such as Quality Declared Seeds (QDS) could be an option to explore for village seed enterprise production. Addressing the supply of maize seeds (improved and hybrid) as well as distribution should be a priority in view of the close link between maize and household food security.
In the context of the drought during 2005 and 2006, Table 15 shows the Mission’s estimates of the supply of and demand for improved seeds. It shows that the supply of Foundation Seeds (FS) is sufficient to cover the need for improved rice and wheat seed in the country but insufficient to cover the maize seed needs (only 12 percent).9 For rice and wheat, despite sufficient overall supply, it was reported that seed growers do not receive the FS of the variety they prefer.
|Rice||1 439 525||55||79 174||19 793||27.60||1 380||69 000||349|
|Maize||860 401||20||17 208||4 302||4.80||504||12|
|Wheat||672 040||120||80 645||20 161||9.66||161||2 683||44 722||222|
Finally, the Mission also confirmed that availability of wheat seeds, and in particular varieties suitable for Hills and high Hills areas, was a particular and major problem for the 2006/07 wheat season due to the poor harvest of the previous season. As a result, there is a good chance that less area was planted with good-quality wheat in the affected areas, with consequent reductions in production. The continuous use of the old, degenerated and infested seeds of poor quality also resulted in disease epidemics in some Hills areas.
Availability of agricultural credit at reasonable rates is obviously essential for commercial agricultural production. Agricultural credit also plays an import role during droughts and other distress conditions as borrowing is an important coping mechanism. This is particularly a problem for vulnerable population groups in view of their heavy reliance, even in normal times, on informal sources of credit characterized by high interest rates.
Rural credit availability from formal channels remains very limited in Nepal despite the presence of many rural finance institutions (RFIs) in Nepal as well as a legal and institutional framework in place for a substantial expansion of rural credit. The formal rural finance sector, supervised or registered with Nepal Rastra Bank or NRB (Central Bank of Nepal), includes over 300 rural branches of commercial banks, about 450 branches of the Agricultural Development Bank Nepal (ADBN), Small Farmers Development Bank with over 130 outlets, several development banks, over 30 savings and credit cooperative societies, and about 30 microfinance NGOs. In addition, the semiformal sector comprises government-sponsored rural credit programmes, over 1 500 savings and credit cooperative societies registered under the Cooperatives Act, and over 50 multisectoral NGOs. The informal sector comprises moneylenders, traders, friends, relatives, as well as thousands of community organizations. Many NGOs operating microfinance programmes also operate outside NRB supervision.
It was not possible to conclude – for lack of aggregate statistics on borrowing from formal sources during the drought period – whether various RFIs managed to expand lending during the drought months and afterwards.
According to the Budget Speech 2006/07, arrangements have been made to complete 64 medium-scale irrigation projects within three years. These projects were conceived to be operated and managed by farmers themselves. In addition, funds have been allocated in the next fiscal year to complete the construction of 40 irrigation projects that were already under way. Similarly, 50 medium-scale irrigation schemes will be initiated in 40 districts covering Western, Mid-Western and Far-Western development regions under the Irrigation and Water Resources Management Programme. Rs 704 million (or US$10.83 million) has been allocated for both of these programs.
Performance of the shallow tubewell (STW) sub-sector in particular is critical during drought episodes because STWs not only provide reliable irrigation but also enable farmers to initiate alternative crops, such as vegetables. Moreover, STWs are more reach in of vulnerable households.
Subsidies on STWs were eliminated in 2000 as part of a Structural Adjustment Programme (SAP) loan, more or less at the same time when fertilizer subsidies were removed. This policy has been very controversial since then, with many experts arguing that this may not have been a well thought out measure given the critical role that STW expansion plays in meeting the goals of the APP. Statistics do show that the expansion of groundwater development, an APP priority area during the Ninth Plan period, was adversely affected by phasing out STW subsidies.
While the issue of subsidies for STWs continues to be debated, it is important to recognize the value of STWs during drought periods for marginal and small farmers. Many parts of the Terai are dry but are well endowed with groundwater that can be utilized by STWs. It is important that the government maintain a capability to upscale STW activity in a targeted manner (both areas and households) in response to drought. In the meantime, constraints to the expansion of STWs should be removed and innovative programmes initiated or upscaled to make water use more accessible to smaller farmers. The former would include, for example, connecting clusters of tubewell sites to rural electricity grids where feasible.
According to the Budget Speech 2006/07, in the next fiscal year, 480 STWs under Ground-Water Shallow Tube-Well Irrigation Program and 5,400 STWs under Community Ground-Water Irrigation Sector Project, covering 12 districts, will be installed. Likewise, 4 000 STWs will be installed in Banke, Dang, Kailali, Kanchanpur, Kapilvastu, Nawalparasi and Rupandehi on a trial basis under the cost-sharing scheme with farmers. A total of 9 880 STWs will be installed and an area of 24 700 hectares of additional land will have irrigation facilities with the implementation of this programme. A sum of Rs 336.8 million (or US$5.18 million) has been allocated for this. At the same time, 37 deep tube-wells will be installed in the next fiscal year under the Groundwater Deep Tube-Well Programme, which will provide additional irrigation facilities on 1 600 hectares of land. Finally, due to the high demand charge of electricity used in shallow and deep tubewell operations, poor farmers are unable to benefit from these technologies. Accordingly, 50 percent of the cost of the demand charge is expected to be borne by the Government.
The diversity of climates and quality soil for fruit production are suitable for a wide variety of fruit species, from litchis to apples, to be grown in Nepal. With a total acreage of over 90,000 hectares, fruits are an important cash crop for Nepal. Fruit cultivation has significantly increased over the past five years, with a 3.7 percent annual growth rate. Both tropical/semi-tropical and temperate fruits have achieved a similar growth rate.
Tropical and semi-tropical fruits covers an area of approximately 72 500 hectares and occupy nearly 80 percent of the total fruit-cultivated area. Over 60 percent of tropical and semi-tropical fruits are grown in Central and Eastern regions with approximately similar distribution. Citrus crops occupy about 15 000 ha. Orange and sweet orange are the main citrus trees cultivated and represent, respectively, 60 percent and 30 percent of the total citrus cultivated area. Over 90 percent of the citrus production is concentrated in the Hills, mostly in the Western, Central and Eastern regions and as a result the production period is concentrated in one short season in December/January. Expansion of production in other areas and diversification of varieties could extend the production period. Other citrus species includes lime (16 percent) and lemon (8 percent). Other tropical and semi-tropical fruits cover much smaller areas and require irrigation systems.
Temperate fruits cover an area of nearly 20 000 hectares. The expansion of the cultivated area of temperate fruit over the past five years is remarkable, as these fruits are cultivated in remote Mountains areas where there is a lack of road connectivity. Increase in winter fruit production could positively impact on rural poverty in the Mountains as experienced in Northern Pakistan. Markets for winter fruits are vast in India and Bangladesh. Nearly 40 percent of temperate fruits are grown in Far- and Mid-Western regions and 25 percent in the Central region. Apple is the main winter fruit and represents 33 percent of the total temperate fruits-cultivated area. Over 40 percent of the apple-cultivated area lies in the Mid-West region, mainly in the Mountains districts. The new road to Jumla will soon provide a market outlet for apple production, and further apple development could potentially reduce rural poverty in Jumla district. Yields remain very low, with an average of only 8.8 tonnes/hectare. Most apples found in major markets in Nepal are from India or China. Pear is the second temperate fruit and covers 25 percent of the temperate fruits cultivated area. Pears are mainly cultivated in the Hills of the Eastern, Central and Western regions. Nepali pears are marketed in large urban markets. Other temperate fruits include peach (18 percent) and plum (12 percent). Grapes are not reported in Nepal but Indian grapes are seen in most market centres. Drier mountain regions could be suitable for high-quality grape production. Walnut is the main nut cultivated in Nepal and represents approximately 1 140 hectares (10 percent), found mainly in the Mid-West Mountains. Demand for walnuts is growing in India and Europe.
Despite promising growth in the past years in the fruit sector, the comparative advantage of Nepal’s privileged ecological location has not yet been turned into competitive advantage as farming practices remain poor; most trees are not grafted, rootstock varieties are not used, varieties planted are of sub-optimal quality for export, trees are generally not pruned, orchards not fertilized and the distribution chain is sub-optimal. This results in biennial bearing, low productivity (average of 9.5 tonnes/hectare) and low quality of fruit on the market. Fruit markets in Nepal continue to be supplied with products from India and China. Yet there are substantial import substitution opportunities to start with and vast opportunities for export to neighbouring countries for future developments when the production, productivity and quality of fruits improve. Unlocking this potential would require good research and extension work and possibly plantation subsidy of high-quality seedlings from professional nurseries in the initial years. Some plant material such as root-stocks may need to be imported. Research linkages with countries benefiting from similar agro-ecological conditions and having successfully developed perennial horticulture crops, particularly northern Pakistan, would be advantageous. Some Himalayan valleys in Northern Pakistan have been successfully converted into high-value fruit orchards over the past two decades.
Nepal does not have a formal employment guarantee programme, as there is, for example, in India. However, several government programmes fit this category well. The most extensive of these is the FFW programme implemented by WFP. In the Budget Speech for 2006/07, the implementation of a Decentralized Rural Infrastructure Development and Livelihood Project was announced. This project will be implemented in 18 remote and conflict-affected districts. The project will entail the construction of 100 km of rural roads and 20 suspension bridges. A total of Rs 500 million (or US$7.69 million) has been allocated for this programme. It was also said that income-generating activities would be supported to cover 18 700 farm families through Community Livestock Programmes targeted to Dalits and freed bonded labourers in 22 districts which have a high density of such communities. The Poverty Alleviation Fund (PAF) is also to be augmented. The PAF was established as an autonomous institution through Poverty Alleviation Fund Ordinance 2004 to implement targeted programmes to improve the socio-economic situation of the lower-income population groups caught up in absolute poverty. For 2006/07, a total of Rs 1.25 billion (or US$19.23 million) has been allocated to the Fund. The fund will be used to implement 667 income-generating programmes, 379 community infrastructure development programmes and 1 714 creative programmes in 1 200 VDCs of 25 districts. Districts include seven in Far-Western and ten in Mid-Western development regions that are identified as backward districts in terms of economic and human development. About 50 000 low-income households are expected to benefit from this programme.
The confluence of high population growth, extremely limited scope for expansion of cultivated areas, under-developed irrigation infrastructures, continuing high level of dependence on agriculture for livelihood and almost stagnant productivity for staple crops have resulted in acute risks of nationwide food insecurity. There is a real urgency to make agriculture the highest Government priority and substantially increase investments in the sector to avert a looming food insecurity crisis in Nepal.
The APP provides an agriculture strategy for Nepal. However, a number of key strategic issues were identified to better adapt to the current economic, social and political contexts.
Ensure that agriculture strategies:
- Recognize that the foremost comparative advantage of Nepal is its human capital in the form of skilful and entrepreneurial farmers. Focus should be placed on easing constraints which are limiting Nepali farmers to embrace higher productivity and market linkages.
- Take into account previous evidence in Nepal that community participation and demand-driven approaches are the most efficient and conflict-resilient strategies. Reconciliation and peace building have to be matched by quick impacts, pro-poor and broad-based development approaches in order to ensure lasting results. Community participation is very high in infrastructure programmes (e.g. irrigation) and FFW can be used as an incentive to build local infrastructures. At this juncture, agriculture programming should be tight, with programmes capable of high social mobilization such as irrigation projects. The current institutional set-up between the Ministry of Irrigation and MoAC is not sufficiently conducive to achieve such desirable synergies.
Exploit Nepal’s broad range of ecological zones and its proximity to vast regional markets (India, China and Bangladesh):
- The Mountains have a comparative advantage in animal production, livestock products, temperate fruits and nuts and medicinal plants/herbs.
- The Hills benefit from a comparative advantage in a variety of crops, such as off-season vegetables, fruits, tea, coffee, spices, medicinal plants/herbs and seed production.
- The Terai, despite similar agro-ecological conditions with northern India, have comparative advantages in tropical fruits, vegetables, oilseeds and cereals.
Identify several commodities with the best development potential and concentrate efforts on the most promising options.
Capitalize on research and experiences from regions with similar agro-ecological conditions, particularly in Northern India and Pakistan.
Build partnership with private actors and NGOs as demonstrated by successful collaborative experience in several districts between DADO and NGOs.
Adopt value-chain and market-oriented approaches to agriculture development, capitalizing on and learning from existing successes (e.g. Winrock).
Operationalizing an agriculture strategy at this juncture requires practical interventions that take advantage of the fact that MoAC agriculture officers are now able to travel in rural areas of most districts of Nepal. Possible interventions have been categorized in three groups:
Quick impact: improvement in the living conditions of beneficiaries is expected after six months of project implementation. Quick impact projects would typically be implemented with grants allocated to the Transitional Government of Nepal or implementing agencies.
Mid-term: improvement in the living conditions of beneficiaries is expected between one and three years of project implementation. Mid-term projects would typically be implemented through technical assistance to the Government of Nepal.
Long-term: improvement in the living conditions of beneficiaries is expected between three and seven years of project implementation. Long-term projects would typically be implemented through loans to the Government of Nepal.
Recommended priority interventions include:
Rehabilitate farmers’ managed irrigation systems on a large scale: to reduce vulnerability to drought and flood and increase crop productivity. Focus should be on the rehabilitation of head-water infrastructures, while priority should be given to regions/districts prone to drought and other natural disasters.
Implement FFW programs: to prevent harmful coping strategies of vulnerable population affected by drought and natural disasters and to create community rural infrastructures. Support land terracing that can provide access to new agricultural land for rural poor should be explored.
Consolidate existing early warning systems through joint government and international agency participation and create emergency preparedness stocks (e.g. micro-irrigation equipment; pipe/sprinkler irrigation or traddle pump and cash crop seeds): to respond quickly to natural disasters and support livelihood recovery of affected households.
Promote the utilization of adequate wheat seed storage at local level: to increase household capacity to store wheat seeds during monsoon and increase wheat production.
Support cash crop development through marketing and value-chain approach: to increase farmers’ income and market integration.
Respond quickly and appropriately to emergency nutrition situation through Community-based Therapeutic Care (CTC), particularly in the Far- and Mid-West: to reduce very high level of wasting of children under five in districts affected by drought.
Extend the current WFP emergency operation in the Far- and Mid-Western regions to those areas that have been affected by drought in subsequent seasons, targeting about 69 400 poor beneficiaries severely affected in these areas as well as 40 500 people residing in other areas of these regions and currently facing severe food insecurity conditions.
Closely monitor food security and vulnerability factors that contribute to vulnerability and coping mechanisms: to respond quickly to current vulnerability and to develop a programme of interventions in the event of future production shocks; strengthen the capacities of the Government agencies (MoAC, DHM, and CBS) in early warning and vulnerability analysis; and strengthen cooperation and communication for information and implementation between UN agencies and government agencies.
Suggest applying FAO/WFP’s Integrated Food Security and Humanitarian Phase Classification (IPC) Framework, which provides details of the main phase categories: 1) Generally food-secure, 2) Chronically food-insecure, 3) Acute food and livelihood crisis, 4) Humanitarian emergency, and 5) Famine/Humanitarian catastrophe at the local level.
Recommended priority interventions include:
Establish a technical group on agriculture, supported by a lead technical agency, at highest level of the Nepal government: to create sufficient momentum in the agriculture sector and ensure the implementation of relevant policies and strategies.
Upgrade community seed producers under the DISSPRO programme to “village seed enterprises” through technical assistance and matching grants: to insure supply and distribution of quality staple crop seeds and increase production.
Upgrade wholesale agriculture market infrastructures: to remove major constraints on cash crop marketing.
Conduct sectoral market research in Nepal and neighbouring countries (e.g. perennial horticulture, vegetables, spices, medicinal and stimulant plants, livestock products): to identify best cash crop opportunities for private- and public-sector investments.
Conduct on-farm crop rotation experiments at different elevations which include fodder and cash crops: to increase cropping intensity and optimize crop rotation systems by agro-ecological zone.
Implement an aggressive nutrition programme that may include mother and child care, food practices, health and clean water supply: to tackle the causes of very high chronic child malnutrition (stunting).
Implement a longer-term programme aimed at improving the nutrition situation, including a school feeding programme combined with nutrition education at primary schools and a mother and child health and nutrition programme directed at areas with high levels of wasted and underweight children.
Ensure a closer collaboration between WFP and NFC, particularly in improving the targeting mechanism used by NFC, based on experiences gained through WFP’s food security monitoring system.
Undertake a comprehensive study on seasonal migration and its benefits as a coping strategy.
Long- term interventions
Recommended priority interventions include:
Expand year-round irrigation infrastructures and provide institutional support to water users associations to reduce vulnerability, increase crop intensity, diversity and yield and ultimately reduce poverty.
Increase investments in South-North road corridors to create outlet for cash crops and improve road connectivity between various ecological zones.
Promote high-value perennial fruit development through support to horticulture marketing clusters, establishment of nurseries, expansion of area under cultivation and promotion of best orchards management and integrated pest management practices. Such projects should capitalize on legume fodder opportunities as intercrop in existing and new orchards.
Strengthen research in seed sector with focus on maize, soybean and vegetable and cash crop development for most promising commodities identified by agro-ecological zones and development regions.
Map A1: Two Principal Crops, by District
|Taplejung (EM)||49 503||4 950||1 567||29 285||2 970||38 773||10 730|
|Sankhuwasabha(EM)||58 873||5 887||1 675||34 613||3 532||45 707||13 166|
|Solukhumbu(EM)||38 687||3 869||1 489||23 233||2 321||30 912||7 775|
|Panchthar(EH)||58 046||5 805||2 161||44 665||3 483||56 113||1 932|
|Ilam(EH)||88 830||8 883||2 497||65 034||5 330||81 743||7 087|
|Terhathum(EH)||48 516||4 852||1 413||24 302||2 911||33 478||15 039|
|Dhankuta(EH)||73 566||7 357||1 481||36 497||4 414||49 749||23 817|
|Bhojpur(EH)||78 871||7 887||1 699||41 735||4 732||56 053||22 818|
|Khotang(EH)||84 390||8 439||1 837||48 950||5 063||64 289||20 101|
|Okhaldhunga(EH)||52 148||5 215||1 427||34 110||3 129||43 881||8 267|
|Udayapur(EH)||58 398||5 840||1 478||68 244||3 504||79 065||-20 668|
|Jhapa(ET)||281 768||28 177||7 547||152 558||16 906||205 188||76 580|
|Morang(ET)||241 272||24 127||6 475||195 392||14 476||240 471||801|
|Sunsari(ET)||170 917||17 092||5 048||151 649||10 255||184 043||-13 127|
|Saptari(ET)||124 917||12 492||5 567||130 603||7 495||156 157||-31 240|
|Siraha(ET)||119 546||11 955||4 410||132 171||7 173||155 708||-36 163|
|Dolakha(CM)||31 417||3 142||1 283||45 736||1 885||52 046||-20 629|
|Sindhupalchok(CM)||112 939||11 294||2 816||68 253||6 776||89 139||23 800|
|Rasuwa(CM)||13 736||1 374||580||10 208||824||12 986||750|
|Ramechhap(CH)||79 146||7 915||2 003||46 373||4 749||61 040||18 106|
|Sindhuli(CH)||74 346||7 435||1 661||64 841||4 461||78 396||-4051|
|Kavrepalanchok(CH)||123 933||12 393||3 504||86 778||7 436||110 111||13 822|
|Bhaktapur(CH)||38 102||3 810||893||53 545||2 286||60 534||-22 433|
|Lalitpur(CH)||45 758||4 576||1 054||80 597||2 746||88 972||-43 214|
|Kathmandu(CH)||65 198||6 520||1 571||289 461||3 912||301 463||-236 266|
|Nuwakot(CH)||96 077||9 608||2 151||64 489||5 765||82 012||14 065|
|Dhading(CH)||76 590||7 659||1 952||77 284||4 595||91 490||-14 900|
|Makwanpur(CH)||94 968||9 497||2 235||90 921||5 698||108 351||-13 383|
|Dhanusha(CT)||133 625||13 362||5 362||154 477||8 017||181 219||-47 594|
|Mahottari(CT)||93 972||9 397||4 095||128 706||5 638||147 836||-53 864|
|Sarlahi(CT)||130 501||13 050||4 864||150 094||7 830||175 838||-45 337|
|Rautahat(CT)||106 720||10 672||3 812||130 223||6 403||151 110||-44 391|
|Bara(CT)||230 770||23 077||6 844||135 215||13 846||178 982||51 788|
|Parsa(CT)||175 497||17 550||4 656||119 752||10 530||152 488||23 009|
|Chitwan(CT)||141 204||14 120||3 013||113 491||8 472||139 096||2 107|
|Manang(WM)||2 777||278||205||2 731||167||3 381||-604|
|Mustang(WM)||2 853||285||184||3 128||171||3 769||-916|
|Gorkha(WH)||106 207||10 621||2 151||63 279||6 372||82 423||23 784|
|Lamjung(WH)||78 071||7 807||1 774||39 136||4 684||53 402||24 669|
|Tanahu(WH)||101 986||10 199||1 574||70 471||6 119||88 362||13 624|
|Kaski(WH)||107 166||10 717||2 501||90 214||6 430||109 862||-2 696|
|Parbat(WH)||58 998||5900||1 426||33 909||3 540||44 774||14 224|
|Syangja(WH)||149 958||14 996||2 485||67 490||8 997||93 968||55 990|
|Palpa(WH)||69 627||6 963||1 604||58 840||4 178||71 585||-1 957|
|Myagdi(WH)||42 017||4 202||1 119||25 090||2 521||32 932||9 085|
|Baglung(WH)||71 908||7 191||1 813||59 555||4 314||72 873||-965|
|Gulmi(WH)||70 945||7 094||1 698||64 230||4 257||77 279||-6 335|
|Arghakhanchi(WH)||52 146||5 215||1 635||46 038||3 129||56 016||-3 870|
|Nawalparasi(WT)||147 873||14 787||4 297||132 898||8 872||160 855||-12 982|
|Rupandehi(WT)||200 915||20 092||7 021||172 216||12 055||211 384||-10 469|
|Kapilvastu(WT)||156 315||15 631||6 316||114 132||9 379||145 457||10 857|
|Dolpa(MWM)||5 264||526||221||6 624||316||7 687||-2 423|
|Mugu(MWM)||9 734||973||592||9 980||584||12 129||-2 395|
|Humla(MWM)||4 759||476||406||9 096||286||10 264||-5 505|
|Jumla(MWM)||25 010||2 501||1 356||20 003||1 501||25 360||-350|
|Kalikot(MWM)||18 185||1 819||1 182||23 756||1 091||27 848||-9 663|
|Rukum(MWH)||57 558||5 756||2 070||42 877||3 453||54 155||3 402|
|Rolpa(MWH)||40 762||4 076||1 824||46 780||2 446||55 126||-14 364|
|Pyuthan(MWH)||45 569||4 557||1 775||48 320||2 734||57 386||-11 817|
|Salyan(MWH)||80 204||8 020||2 549||47 699||4 812||63 081||17 124|
|Jajarkot(MWH)||35 505||3 551||1 373||30 256||2 130||37 310||-1 805|
|Dailekh(MWH)||58 607||5861||1 552||51 001||3 516||61 930||-3 323|
|Surkhet(MWH)||105 230||10 523||2 861||67 726||6 314||87 423||17 807|
|Dang Deokhuri(MWT)||152 052||15 205||3 642||109 876||9 123||137 847||14 205|
|Banke(MWT)||93 298||9 330||3 345||93 579||5 598||111 852||-18 554|
|Bardiya(MWT)||136 618||13 662||4 125||91 462||8 197||117 446||19 172|
|Bajura(FWM)||15 603||1 560||882||24 390||936||27 769||-12 165|
|Bajhang(FWM)||30 126||3 013||1 501||37 804||1 808||44 125||-13 999|
|Darchula(FWM)||28 253||2 825||1 320||27 596||1 695||33 436||-5 183|
|Achham(FWH)||33 461||3 346||1 356||51 460||2 008||58 170||-24 709|
|Doti(FWH)||42 159||4 216||2 047||47 729||2 530||56 521||-14 362|
|Baitadi(FWH)||39 858||3 986||1 663||52 188||2 391||60 228||-20 370|
|Dadeldhura(FWH)||31 748||3 175||1 396||28 622||1 905||35 098||-3 349|
|Kailali(FWT)||186 825||18 682||5 808||157 402||11 209||193 102||-6 278|
|Kanchanpur(FWT)||156 569||15 657||5 183||96 063||9 394||126 297||30 272|
|Nepal||6 352 732||635 273||189 952||5 370 981||381 164||6 577 371||-224 639|
This report has been prepared by Cheng Fang, Ramesh Sharma, and Raphy Favre (FAO); and Siemon Hollema (WFP), under the responsibility of the FAO and WFP Secretariats with information from official and other sources. Since conditions may change rapidly, please contact the undersigned for further information if required.
Chief, GIEWS, FAO
Fax: : 0039-06-5705-4495
E-mail: [email protected]
Regional Director, ODB. WFP
Fax: : 0066-2-2881046
E-mail: [email protected]
The Special Alerts/Reports can also be received automatically by E-mail as soon as they are published, by subscribing to the GIEWS/Alerts report ListServ. To do so, please send an E-mail to the FAO-Mail-Server at the following address: [email protected], leaving the subject blank, with the following message:
To be deleted from the list, send the message:
Please note that it now possible to subscribe to regional lists to only receive Special Reports/Alerts by region: Africa, Asia, Europe or Latin America (GIEWSAlertsAfrica-L, GIEWSAlertsAsia-L, GIEWSAlertsEurope-L and GIEWSAlertsLA-L). These lists can be subscribed to in the same way as the worldwide list.
1. WB Report, Nepal Resilience Amidst Conflict – An Assessment of Poverty in Nepal, 1995-96 and 2003-04, Report No. 34834-NP, 2006.
2. “The SPS Agreement: Trade in Live Animals and Animal Products”, by S. Mahato, G. Gongol and B. Chaulagain in Implications of the WTO Membership on the Nepalese Agriculture, by R. Sharma, M. Karkee and L. Gautam (Editors), FAO, UNDP and MoAC, 2004, Kathmandu.
3. Cereal deficit of some vulnerable groups in Terai may not be translated into effective demand.
4. Lee (Chungbuk National University, S Korea) and Gaihre (CBS in Nepal), 2006: Research Paper on Prevalence of Undernourishment in Nepal.
5. CBS, 2005: Poverty Trends in Nepal (1995-96 and 2003-04).
6. FAOSTAT, 2007.
7. These data were reported in National Crop and Food Supply Assessment Mission Results, December 2006, Ministry of Agriculture and Co-operatives, Nepal.
8. In contrast, for example, the situation is much better for vegetables in particular where seeds are imported on a large scale.
9. Note that Nepal does not produce hybrid maize varieties, which are in demand by farmers in the Terai and the Hills.