1. GEOGRAPHY AND CLIMATE
Somalia (surface area of 627 340 km2) has four main topographic areas. The northwest and northeast regions consist of steppes lying on a highland of crystalline rocks which show numerous fissures and become uneven along the coast. Mudug area lies between Nogal and the Indian Ocean and the Scebeli River. It is an arid high plateau which rises 600 metres above sea level. The central and southern regions, situated between the Scebeli and Juba Rivers, are a fertile agricultural area characterized by extensive, comparatively densely populated, plains. The Upper Juba region, which lies between the Juba River, Ethiopia and Kenya, is covered by a thick bush and in certain places with forests.
The climate of the area where there is the possibility of harvesting inland fisheries is tropical, semi-arid with a seasonal rainfall pattern influenced by monsoon winds; two types of rainfall occur: Mogadishu type on the Scebeli River; and Kismayo type along the Juba River, where there is a continental steppe climate with 388.5 mm mean annual rainfall. The economy is based on subsistence livestock herding, with some agriculture in the better watered south.
2. HYDROGRAPHY
2.1 Lakes
There are no natural lakes of significant size.
2.2 Rivers, Floodplains and Swamps
There are two main rivers in Somalia: the Juba and Scebeli. Both run from the Ethiopian Highlands southeasterly across Somalia to the Indian Ocean. The Juba River empties itself at an estuary near Kismayo. It is about 800 km long and 122.5 metres wide, the area being roughly 98 000 km2. The Scebeli River does not reach the Indian Ocean but ends in a swampy area near Gelib. It is 1 100 km long, 82 metres wide, with an area of about 90 000 km2.
The Scebeli River floods in rainy season and fills up natural ground depressions and an ancient bed, creating temporary sloughs, swamps, pools, creeks and small lakes. Flooding of the Juba River also fills natural depressions, especially oxbows in its lower part. Marshes near Gelib are flooded by collected water and Juba infiltration.
2.3 Reservoirs
There are several projects for dams and compensating reservoirs (Bardhere, Fanole) for controlled irrigation, stabilization of the flow to prevent floods, and production of electricity. There are some 240 small reservoirs used for livestock watering.
2.4 Coast Lagoons
None.
2.5 Aquaculture
There is no aquaculture in Somalia (Vincke, 1989, pers.comm.).
3. FISHERY PRODUCTION/POTENTIAL
3.1 Fish production and per caput supply
Table 1. FISH PRODUCTION AND PER CAPUT SUPPLY - Somalia, 1970–1987
Nominal Production (including exports) (t) 2 | Nominal Consumer Supply (including exports) (kg/person) 5 | ||||||||
Year | Population '000 1 | No inland capture | Aquaculture 3 | Marine capture 4 | Total | No inland capture | Aquaculture 3 | Marine capture | Total |
1970 | 2 634 | 5 000 | 5 000 | 1.9 | 1.9 | ||||
1971 | 2 747 | 5 000 | 5 000 | 1.8 | 1.8 | ||||
1972 | 2 866 | 5 000 | 5 000 | 1.7 | 1.7 | ||||
1973 | 2 989 | 30 000 | 30 000 | 10.0 | 10.0 | ||||
1974 | 3 118 | 32 600 | 32 600 | 10.5 | 10.5 | ||||
1975 | 3 252 | 32 600 | 32 600 | 10.0 | 10.0 | ||||
1976 | 3 393 | 32 600 | 32 600 | 9.6 | 9.6 | ||||
1977 | 3 539 | 14 794 | 14 794 | 4.2 | 4.2 | ||||
1978 | 3 693 | 8 384 | 8 384 | 2.3 | 2.3 | ||||
1979 | 3 852 | 10 984 | 10 984 | 2.8 | 2.8 | ||||
1980 | 4 019 | 14 330 | 14 330 | 3.6 | 3.6 | ||||
1981 | 4 138 | 9 523 | 9 523 | 2.3 | 2.3 | ||||
1982 | 4 262 | 8 730 | 8 730 | 2.0 | 2.0 | ||||
1983 | 4 388 | 11 195 | 11 195 | 2.6 | 2.6 | ||||
1984 | 4 519 | 19 639 | 19 639 | 4.3 | 4.3 | ||||
1985 | 4 653 | 16 467 | 16 467 | 3.5 | 3.5 | ||||
1986 | 4 752 | 16 500 | 16 500 | 3.5 | 3.5 | ||||
1987 | 4 853 | 17 000 | 17 000 | 3.5 | 3.5 |
1 Source: FAO
2 Source: FAO Fisheries Department FISHDAB
3 No aquaculture in Somalia (Vincke, 1989, pers.comm.)
4 Marine exports, from 1980 to 1983, were as follows: 1980: 682 t; 1981: 606 t; 1982: 1 161 t; 1983: 2 951 t
5 Most of the fish being exported, the “nominal consumer supply” data for marine capture do not reflect the reality and are highly overestimated.
3.2 Inland catch range and potential yield
No information is available for the Juba and Scebeli Rivers.
4. STATE OF THE FISHERY
4.1 Yield
No data is collected. Some fishing is known to occur in the Tummi Marshes.
4.2 Factors influencing yield
Adverse factors are an aversion to eating fish by nomadic communities and rainfall variability.
4.3 Future development possibilities
Some expansion is possible in the future, but marine fisheries are likely always to overshadow inland fisheries.
Fig. 1. MAP OF SOMALIA
5. KEY BIBLIOGRAPHY (none)
6. WATER BODIES DIRECTORY
Rivers |
Genale Dorya/Juba/Giuba |
Shabale/Scebeli |
GENALE DORYA/JUBA/GIUBA RIVER
(International water)
Geographical data | |
Source: | Mendebo Mountains, Ethiopia - 6° 49'N; 38° 41'E |
Total length: | 1 600 km |
Countries traversed: | Ethiopia, Somalia, Kenya (Lagh Bor) |
Major tributaries: | Webbe Schibele, Lagh Bor |
Discharges to: | Indian Ocean, Somalia - 0° 14'S; 42° 32'E |
SHABALE/SCEBELI RIVER
(International water)
Geographical data | |
Source: | Mendebo Mountains, central Ethiopia |
Altitude: | 3 170 m asl |
Total length: | 1 900 km (850 km in Somalia) |
Countries traversed: | Ethiopia, Somalia |
Major tributaries: | Dacata, Illili |
Discharges to: | Juba River (near Camouma), 55 km before Indian Ocean mouth of the latter |
Special features: | an elongate floodplain (Tummi Marshes) along its lower course in Somalia. |
1. GEOGRAPHY AND CLIMATE (Welcomme, 1979)
Sudan (with an area of 2 476 800 km2) is a flat country with elevated lands to the east, south and southwest. Vegetation patterns change from tropical forest in the south through semi-tropical savanna to sandy arid hills in the north. Extreme desert conditions prevail in the northwest. The central zone of the country is transected by the Nile Valley with its large swamp depression in the Sudd.
The north of the country has a desertic climate with little rainfall throughout the year. The centre of the country has an unstable climate, with a pronounced rainy season of variable duration. In the south the climate is equatorial, with more or less daily rainfall.
Sudan is mainly a desertic country; there is, therefore, a very high demand for water. The several reservoirs are for flow retention associated with irrigation areas. The Jonglei Canal will allow about 10% of the present Nile flow to bypass the Sudd Swamps to increase the amount of water available for irrigation downstream.
2. HYDROGRAPHY (adapted mainly from Balarin, 1988)
The freshwater resources of the Sudan have been comprehensively reviewed by CSTR (1982). Dumon (1984) presents the most recent series of papers on limnology and marine biology. This text summarizes some of that data. According to OSRO (1986), nearly 12.90 million hectares are under water, 5% of the total area in the Sudan. Of the available water, less than 50% is used, and the potential water supply is enormous if underground reserves are included (Table 2). The Nile system is the main feature of the hydrology of Sudan, including the Nile and its tributaries (Table 3), a number of man-made lakes (Table 1) and the swamps of the Sudd. Non-Nilotic streams of minor importance supply water to 806 hafirs (natural depressions enlarged into small ponds) and 31 dams (Table 4). (See Figs. 1, 2 and 3.)
2.1 Lakes
The principal natural lakes in the country are the numerous small floodplain lakes, most important of which is Lake No, which concentrates the major part of the flow from the Nile as it emerges from the Sudd. A few smaller isolated lakes also occur (Welcomme, 1979). (See Figs. 4 and 5.)
2.2 Rivers, Floodplains and Swamps
The main river system (Figs. 1, 2, 4, 5) is that of the Nile. The Albert Nile enters Sudan from Uganda through a narrow gorge in a series of rapids at Nimule. Northward, it becomes known as the Bahr El Jebel which flows into the great swamps of southern Sudan, North of Mangola. The main tributary of the Bahr El Jebel is the Aswa, originating from the Marolo mountain on the Kenyan border. The river widens to several kilometers and divides into the Bahr El Jebel and Bahr El Zeraf in the Sudd Region. There the rivers have numerous channels and follow a serpentine course, to be joined by the Bahr El Ghazal, which drains the southwest part of Sudan, forming the White Nile. South of Malakal, the Sobat River of a catchment area of 224 000 km2 consisting of the Baro and Pibar tributaries, joins the White Nile. From here northward the valley is steep sided until it joins the Blue Nile at Khartoum.
The Blue Nile, with a catchment of 325 000 km2, originates in Ethiopia and extends 2 000 km until it joins the White Nile to become the River Nile. Within Sudan the Blue Nile is joined by the Dinder and Rabad tributaries. The main Nile passes the Sabaloka Gorge and is joined by the Atbara, a catchment of 100 000 km2 and main tributary Sesit. Thereafter there are two further cataracts before the Nile leaves Sudan at Lake Nubia.
In total, the Nile traverses 3 000 km of Sudan. Its water balance is given in Table 3. The overall runoff coefficient is low, at an estimated 6% (Ibrahim, 1984); during its passage through the Sudd and Machar swamps nearly 50% of the annual flow is lost through evaporation, seepage and evapotranspiration. (Europa Publs., 1986).
The Nile is also known for its marked seasonal and annual variations, with more than 80% of its annual flow occuring from August to October. The percentage contributions of the main tributaries indicates that 85% of its flow comes from the Ethiopian Highlands. This can increase to 95% during floods, or decrease to 60% in the dry season, due to the evaporation loss from the White Nile at the Sudd; consequently these waters tend to be more saline. The Sudd also has a regulating effect on flow, so the White Nile is not characterized by marked seasonal flow, as is the Blue Nile.
The flat clay plains, covered with vast areas of papyrus marsh and seaonsal grasslands, which lie between the Bahr El Jebel, Bahr El Zerat and the confluence of the White Nile are known as the Sudd. The word means “blockage”, and refers to rafts of vegetation which periodically block the river. The area includes 8 300 km2 of permanent swamps and over 80 000 km2 of flood during the flood seasons (Krishnamurthy, 1981). The shallow floodplains (termed “Touch”) flood during July-September. From November the waters recede, isolating the floodplain, which then drains through river channels and by February is dry, leaving a number of lagoons and deep pools which make up a major fishery.
The 360 km Jonglei Canal from Malakal to Bar (Fig. 5) will shortcircuit the swamp and divert water to irrigate 1.6 million ha of crops. Drainage of 20 million m3/day is likely to drop the flood level by 29 cm and drastically reduce the swamp area (Krishnamurthy, 1981).
2.3 Reservoirs
A number of major reservoirs have been built or are proposed for the Nile system, mainly for irrigation water storage (Figs 2 and 3, Table 1). Conditions require some form of water storage for the dry period. Natural depressions were enlarged into small ponds of up to 500 000 m3, 2–8 m deep; these are known as “hafirs”. Table 4 summarizes the status as of 1976, and greater detail of perennial “hafirs” is given in Table 5. CSTR (1982) lists over 809 hafirs and 32 earthen dams in 1976 and mentions that a further 200 hafirs and dams were planned. Some units serve all through the dry season; others last only two to three months. CSTR (1982) describes a number of systems.
Conventional hafirs:
Situated in areas of suitable soil and hydrology, these units generally are the shape of an inverted frustrum of a pyramid. The long sides have steep slopes of 1:1.5-2 with 1:3–4 slope on the end rams to allow machines to work. Two types are typical:
On-stream - usually sited across the course of a stream with a
spillway; and
Off-stream - sited away from the river course, filled by a canal
from the stream or via a weir.
Other types: Traditionally, stream flow characterizes the filling of a hafir but, as such sites are limited, others are sited near a hill to catch the runoff with diversion canals.
Fig. 1. MAP OF SUDAN
Fig. 2. MAIN RIVERS, SWAMPS AND RESERVOIRS
(Balarin, 1988)
Table 1. MORPHOLOGICAL DATA OF THE SUDD AND MAJOR RESERVOIRS
(Balarin, 1988)
Nos. refer to Fig.2 | Name (date constructed) | Basin/District | Description | Fishery Potential (t/yr) | Use e | Water temp. (°C) | |||
Volume (109m3) | Area (km2) | Altitude (m) | Mean depth (m) | ||||||
1 | Sennar (1925) a | Blue Nile | 0.93 e | 140–160 | 422 | 6.5 | 1 100 | f, p, i | |
2 | Jebel Aulia (1937) a b c | White Nile | 3.5 c | 600–1 500 | 377 | 2.3–6 | 4 500–15 000 | f,i | 21–29.5 |
3 | Khashm el Girba (1964) a | Atbara River | 0.85–1.3 e d | 125 | 6.8 | 860 | i,f,p | ||
4 | Rosieres (1966) a c | Blue Nile | 3.0 | 290 | 10.0 | 1 700 | p,f,i | ||
5 | Lake Nubia (1964) a c | Nile | 830–1 000 | 185 | 25.0 | 5 100 | p,i,f | 17–32 | |
Proposed, or of uncertain status: | |||||||||
6 | Semna Dam d | Nile | |||||||
7 | 4th Cataract Dam d | Nile | 8.0 | ||||||
8 | 5th Cataract Dam d | Nile | |||||||
9 | Sabaloka Dam d | Nile | |||||||
10 | Bedden Dam d | Bahr el Jebel | |||||||
11 | Upper Atbara Dam d | Atbara | |||||||
12 | Aburakam Dam f | Rahad | |||||||
13 | Meina el Mek Dam f | Blue Nile |
Key: c=commercial/industrial;
i=irrigation;
f=fishery;
p=power generation;
w=water supply.
Sources:
a Henderson (1975)
b George et al., (1985)
c Welcomme (1972)
d Ibrahim (1984)
e CSTR (1982)
f Coche (1983)
Table 2. POTENTIALITY OF WATER SUPPLY IN THE SUDAN
(Balarin, 1988, after CSTR, 1982)
Source of supply | Presently available × 109 m3 | Future conservable × 109 m3 | Remarks |
From Nile water agreement (at centre of the Sudan) | 20.35 | 20.35 | In future, this quantity is subject to constraints from the 1959 water agreement. |
Water conserved from the swampy regions | 12.0 | Water from Bahr El Jebel, El Ghazal, R. Baro and Machar Swamps. | |
Non-Nilotic streams | 8.0 | Only a minor part of this water is utilized by Hafirs and dams (including Baraka and Gash). | |
Annual recharged ground water | 0.3 | 2.0 | From all the ground water resources in the country. |
Water conserved from improved irrigation efficiency | 2.0 | Assuming a 10 improvement in efficiency. | |
Total annual amount | 20.65 | 43.35 | This is the quantity of water that may be obtained annually. |
Water from ground water | 564.0 | Water in storage without annual recharge. |
Table 3. WATER BALANCE OF THE NILE
(Balarin, 1988)
River | Location | Drainage Area (ha × '000) | Precipitation (mm/yr) | Runoff (mm) | Runoff Coefficent (%) | Mean Discharge (m3/s/yr) |
Victoria Nile | Ripon Falls | 269 | 1 302 | 81 | 6.0 | 699 |
Semliki | Victoria Nile Confl. | 22 | 1 395 | 88 | 6.0 | 63 |
Albert Nile | Below Lake Albert | 281 | 1 309 | 85 | 6.0 | 762 |
Interbasin | Lake Albert-Mongalla | 184 | 1 228 | 20 | 2.0 | 111 |
White Nile | Mongalla | 466 | 1 277 | 60 | 5.0 | 874 |
Interbasin | Mongalla-Sobat | 438 | 900 | 38 | - | 511 |
White Nile | Abore Sobat | 904 | 1 094 | 12 | 1.0 | 362 |
Sobat | Mouth | 187 | 1 081 | 71 | 7.0 | 431 |
White Nile | below Sobat | 1 092 | 1 091 | 22 | 2.0 | 793 |
Interbasin | Sobat-Blue Nile | 343 | 500 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
White Nile | above Blue Nile | 1 435 | 710 | 16 | 2.0 | 793 |
Blue Nile | White Nile Confl. | 324 | 1 082 | 158 | 15.0 | 1 727 |
Nile | Blue Nile Confl. | 1 759 | 778 | 43 | 6.0 | 2 470 |
Interbasin | Aswan Confl. | 79 | 1 080 | 97 | 9.0 | 244 |
Nile | Aswan | 1 839 | 790 | 45 | 6.0 | 2 664 |
Interbasin | Aswan Mouth | 1 042 | 7 | 18 | - | 71 |
Nile | Mouth | 2 881 | 506 | 28 | 6.0 | 2 593 |
(Dots are Hafirs drawn after George, 1976)
Fig. 3. MAIN DAMS IN SUDAN
(Balarin, 1988)
Table 4. AN INVENTORY OF DAMS AND HAFIRS IN THE SUDAN - 1976
(Balarin, 1988, after CSTR, 1982)
Province | Hafirs | Dams | Embankments | Weirs | W Spreading Scheme | |||||
Total | Capacity (m3×103) | Total | Capacity (m3×103) | Total | Capacity (m3×103) | Total | Capacity (m3×103) | Total | Watered area (m3×103) | |
Red Sea | 1 | 60 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 8 | 16 230 |
Kassala | 127 | 3 307 | 3 | 401 | 1 | 120 | - | - | - | - |
White Nile | 33 | 727 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Northern Kordofan | 89 | 2 782 | 1 | 2 000 | 1 | 60 | 2 | 181 | - | - |
Northern Darfur | 56 | 2 359 | 22 | 14 254 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Blue Nile | 139 | 3 284 | 1 | 650 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Southern Kordofan | 238 | 4 348 | 3 | 4 771 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Southern Darfur | 45 | 376 | 1 | 480 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Upper Nile | 78 | 803 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Total | 806 | 18 050 | 31 | 22 556 | 2 | 180 | 2 | 181 | 8 | 16 230 |
Table 5. PERENNIAL HAFIRS AND FISH PRODUCTION POTENTIAL
(Balarin, 1988, after George, 1975 + FAO/WB, 1976)
Site | Capacity (m3 × '000) | Total area (ha) | Fish potential* (t/yr) | |
1. | KORDOFAN: | |||
Habila | 25 | |||
Umm Bedir | 80 | |||
El Eleifi | 100 | |||
Birka Kabira | 134 | |||
Tilwadi Dam | 400 | |||
El Mashagga essarga | 230 | |||
Es Sanut | 250 | |||
Hamut el Shekh Weir | 101 | |||
Khor Baggara No.1 | 304 | |||
Umm Lubiya | 84 | |||
Weir El Odayia | 100 | |||
El Ain | 500 | |||
Miri Bara Dam | 4 221.5 | |||
Kortala | 100 | |||
El Sahal | 70 | |||
El Gashta | 70 | |||
Khor Baggara | 2 000 | |||
Khor Baggara No.2 | 316 | |||
Total: 18 | 302 | 21 (60) | ||
2. | BLUE NILE | |||
Musmum 3 + 4 | 100 | |||
L. Dali | 70 | |||
Um Ramata | 150 | |||
S. Mayo 2 + 3 | 100 | |||
El Kurmuk | 75 | |||
Total: 5 | 16 | 1 (3) | ||
3. | DARFUR | |||
Melleit Dam | 931 | |||
Migabila Dam | 300 | |||
Natakero Dam | 1 200 | |||
Sireiba Masonry Dam | 375 | |||
Abu Gidad Dam | 1 500 | |||
Hilsilat Dam | 500 | |||
Wadi Bassau Dam | 680 | |||
Fashar | 120 | |||
Karfu Dam | 1 955 | |||
Asirni | 81 | |||
Tawila Dam | 300 | |||
J. Maaila Dam | 300 | |||
J. Dooma Dam | 120 | |||
Gadid Ras el Fil Dam | 480 | |||
Hilaliya Dam | 1 500 | |||
Wadaa Dam | 77 | |||
Wadi el Ku | 315 | |||
Wadi Gale | 250 | |||
S. Adar | 606 | |||
Total: 19 | 386 | 27 (77) | ||
4. | KASSALA | |||
Lake Smith | 160 | |||
Qureisha | 238 | |||
Dalasa Dam | 160 | |||
Sam Sam | 110 | |||
W. Abu Nahal Twin | 226 | |||
Khor Sayadin | 82 | |||
Abu Gulot Dam | 102 | |||
Gisir Rashid Emb. | 120 | |||
W. Abu Nahal | 185 | |||
El Hawata | 250 | |||
Total: 10 | 54 | 4 (11) | ||
Overall Total: 52 | 758 | 53 (152) |
2.4 Coastal Lagoons
There are no lagoons of significant size.
2.5 Aquaculture
Aquaculture in Sudan has developed both for the classical rearing of food fish in ponds and the selective stocking of water reservoirs and hafirs with fish to increase production (see Section 2.3 - Reservoirs). In addition, rearing of fish in irrigation canals is also practised to clear aquatic weeds as well as for fish production.
Conventional pond fish farming has not developed to any large degree; the most recent estimates by Yousif (1985) indicate 25 ha functional in 1984.
3. FISHERY PRODUCTION/POTENTIAL
3.1 Fish production and per caput supply
Table 6. FISH PRODUCTION AND PER CAPUT SUPPLY - Sudan, 1970–1987
Nominal Production (including exports) (t) 2 | Nominal Consumer Supply (including exports) (kg/person) | ||||||||
Year | Population '000 1 | Inland capture 6 | Aquaculture 3 | Marine capture | Total | Inland capture | Aquaculture 3 | Marine capture | Total |
1970 | 13 859 | 21 400 | - 4 | 800 | 22 200 | 1.5 | - | 0.06 | 1.6 |
1971 | 13 265 | 21 400 | - | 800 | 22 200 | 1.5 | - | 0.06 | 1.6 |
1972 | 14 683 | 21 400 | - | 800 | 22 200 | 1.5 | - | 0.05 | 1.5 |
1973 | 15 113 | 21 800 | - | 800 | 22 600 | 1.4 | - | 0.05 | 1.5 |
1974 | 15 556 | 21 800 | - | 800 | 22 600 | 1.4 | - | 0.05 | 1.5 |
1975 | 16 012 | 21 800 | - | 800 | 22 600 | 1.4 | - | 0.05 | 1.4 |
1976 | 16 514 | 23 900 | - | 800 | 24 700 | 1.4 | - | 0.05 | 1.5 |
1977 | 17 038 | 22 970 | - | 600 | 23 570 | 1.3 | - | 0.04 | 1.4 |
1978 | 17 578 | 25 860 | - | 750 | 26 610 | 1.5 | - | 0.04 | 1.5 |
1979 | 18 127 | 27 820 | - | 700 | 28 520 | 1.5 | - | 0.04 | 1.6 |
1980 | 18 681 | 25 110 | - | 950 | 26 060 | 1.3 | - | 0.05 | 1.4 |
1981 | 19 236 | 27 660 | - | 870 | 28 530 | 1.4 | - | 0.05 | 1.5 |
1982 | 19 795 | 28 610 | 50 5 | 1 050 | 29 710 | 1.4 | 0.003 | 0.05 | 1.5 |
1983 | 20 362 | 25 013 | 37 5 | 4 450 | 29 500 | 1.2 | 0.002 | 0.22 | 1.4 |
1984 | 20 945 | 28 442 | 10 5 | 1 328 | 29 780 | 1.4 | 0.000 | 0.06 | 1.4 |
1985 | 21 550 | 25 851 | 30 5 | 409 | 26 290 | 1.2 | 0.001 | 0.02 | 1.2 |
1986 | 22 181 | 22 711 | 41 5 | 1 190 | 23 942 | 1.0 | 0.002 | 0.05 | 1.1 |
1987 | 22 830 | 22 757 | 43 5 | 1 200 | 24 000 | 1.0 | 0.002 | 0.05 | 1.1 |
1 Source: FAO
2 Source: FAO Fisheries Department FISHDAB
3 included in “Inland capture” if not specified.
4 - = data not available.
5 Vincke, 1989, pers.comm.
6 Exports of inland dried fish, from 1980 to 1983, were as follows: (in equivalent fresh weights, assuming fresh weight = 3.5 × dry weight) 1980: 1 855 t; 1981: 2 237 t; 1982: 2 100 t; 1983: 2 520 t.
3.2 Inland catch range and potential yield
Table 7. (Sources: see text)
Water body | Period | Annual catch range (t) | Potential annual yield (t) | |
Sudd Swamp | 1976;1982 | 11 000;1 000 | 75 000–100 000 | |
Reservoirs | ||||
Jebel Aulia | 1975;1982 | 8 000;8 216 | 4 500;15 000 | |
Khashm El Girba | 1975 | 500–800 | 860 | |
Nasser/Nubia | 1975;1981 | 295;625 | 5 100 | |
Roseires | 1975;1982 | 300;1 800 | 1 700 | |
Sennar | 1975;1982 | 1 000;1 400 | 1 100 | |
Hafirs (Table 5) | - | 53-152 | ||
Aquaculture | 1987 | 43 | - |
No information available for:
Lakes Ambadi, Anyi, Buhayrat Abyad, Keilak, Kundi, No, Nyiropo and Yirol;
Rivers Bahr El Ghazal, Blue Nile, Nile.
Total annual yield:
in 1975–76: 21 095 t (Table 7)
in 1981–82: 13 841 t (Table 7)
(see also Table 6)
Potential annual yield:
88 300 – 123 900 t (Table 7)
105 000 – 117 000 t (Henderson, 1975)
4. STATE OF THE FISHERY
(rearranged and adapted mainly from Balarin, 1988)
4.1 Yield
The distances involved and the remoteness of a large sector of the fishery means that statistics available do not necessarily reflect the situation; there is a general paucity of data.
Potential estimates of the inland fishery range from 105 000 to 130 000 t/yr (Henderson, 1975), although FAO (1982) estimates range between 37 000 and 400 000 t/yr for the Sudd alone (for an apparently overestimated 80 000 km2 surface area). A moderate value of 75 000 to 100 000 t/yr is adopted here. The catch data (Table 6) shows that little improvement has taken place over the years, remaining between 20 000 and 30 000 t/yr, far below the potential.
Recent estimates by Chakraborty (1984) indicate that about 96% of the fish captured are from freshwater fisheries, of which 55% is from the Blue Nile, White Nile, Atbara River and Lake Nubia. The production figures from the south, however, remain doubtful as data collection is hampered by remoteness. Carleton and Pena (1982) surveyed the situation in the Sudd and estimate yields ranging from 6 000 to 43 000 t/yr.
From the Blue Nile the majority of the fish are sundried, while 70% of White Nile catches are consumed fresh. “Tilapia” is the predominant catch, accounting for 46%, followed by Labeo, Synodontis and Lates.
The Nile and its tributaries within Sudan have a surface area of 20 000 km2, 85% of which is represented by the vast swamps in the south. Reservoirs total 3 075 km2, made up of five main units (Table 1); riverine waters make up the rest of the fishery. The latter supplies fish to the main consumption centres, accounting for 12 000–15 000 t/yr.
Aquaculture production from ponds, (reservoirs stocking not included), from 1982 to 1987, is given below (Vincke, 1989, pers.comm.).
Species | 1982 | 1983 | 1984 | 1985 | 1986 | 1987 |
Oreochromis niloticus | 50 t | 37 t | 10 t | 30 t | 41 t | 43 t |
4.2 Factors influencing yield
FAO (1983) considers that development will be hindered not only because of the distance between resources and market, but also by the lack of landing, transport and storage facilities. This is overshadowed by problems in modernizing and mechanisation of a largely subsistence fishery, as well as the necessity to improve quality control, processing and marketing methods. The situation is aggravated by the often localized demand for fish and the unwillingness of a large portion of the Sudanese to accept fishing as an occupation, despite highly promising economic rewards. Fishing is regarded as an occupation of rather low status.
Fig. 4. GENERAL MAP OF THE SOUTHERN SUDAN
(Burgis, 1987)
The Sudd, which has the largest potential of expansion, is the most disorganized (Carleton & Pena, 1982) and therefore will take some time to develop.
Variations in rainfall are also known to affect flooded areas and, as a result, fish production.
The whole future productivity pattern of the Sudd is also in doubt, as the Jonglei Canal may alter the flood regimes of that area, with an expected loss of 20% of the production potential (FAO, 1982). Ironically, the catch may increase because of the canal and the better communications resulting therefrom.
Severe problems of communication, transport, inadequate and often unhygienic means of handling/marketing and shortage of trained and experienced personnel, poor security and unrest in the south, are all serious constraints to a more rapid development.
The low level of development is evident from FAO (1983) estimates that 440 marine and 6 000 inland fishermen are required, many of which are seasonal or part time.
4.3 Future development possibilities
In response to the strong demand for fish and concerted efforts to develop the various fisheries, as well as aquaculture in irrigated areas, the catch should continue to rise. However, the potential itself may be lowered through environmental changes arising from the demand for water for agriculture (Welcomme, 1979).
FAO (1983) considers that the reservoir fisheries are almost fully exploited; an increased yield from Jebel Aulia and Lake Nubia could realize a further 14 000 t/yr. Theoretically there would appear to be enormous scope for fishery expansion, considering that the 1980's freshwater landings only totalled 20 000–30 000 tons. However, there are very serious transport and marketing constraints in that the main fisheries are considerable distances from urban outlets.
Carleton and Pena (1982) clearly emphasize the problem; surveys of the Sudd suggest that present catch may be between 6 000 and 45 000 t/yr. If this is true, the potential for development is minimal, but without definite catch statistics it is difficult to estimate prospects for development.
5. KEY BIBLIOGRAPHY
Balarin, 1988
Burgis, 1987 (Southern Sudan)
6. WATER BODIES DIRECTORY
Lakes | ||
Ambadi | Keilak | Nyiropo |
Anyi | Kundi | Yirol |
Buhayrat Abyad | No | |
Rivers | ||
Bahr El Ghazal | Chari | Sobat |
Blue Nile | Nile | White Nile |
Swamps | ||
Sudd | ||
Reservoirs | ||
Jebel Aulia | Nasser/Nubia | Sennar |
Khashm El Girba | Roseires |
LAKE AMBADI
(all data from Green, 1987)
Geographical data | |
Location: | Sudan - 8°43'N; 29°19'E (see Figs. 4 and 5) |
Altitude: | c 390 m asl |
Length: | about 9 km |
Width: | 1–2 km |
Depth: | max: about 3 m |
Major inflowing river: | Jur |
Outflowing river: | Bahr El Ghazal |
Special feature: | the lake is basically a widened river channel. Human activity is negligible in this area. |
Physical and chemical data | |
(Measurements made in 1954 and in 1976) | |
pH: | 6.4–6.9 |
Conductivity: | K20 40–48 μS/cm |
Oxygen (saturation at 25°C): | |
64% at 10 cm depth | |
54% at 2 m depth |
LAKE ANYI
Geographical data | |
Location: | Sudan - 6°25'N; 30°33'E |
Surface area: | 15 km2 |
Max. length: | 9.5 km |
Max. width: | 3.5 km |
LAKE BUHAYRAT ABYAD
Geographical data | |
Location: | Sudan - 10°18'N; 29°59'E |
Surface area: | 7 km2 |
Max. length: | 8 km |
Max. width: | 1 km |
LAKE KEILAK
(data from Green, 1987)
Geographical data | |
Location: | Sudan - 10°50'N; 29°17'E (see Fig. 4) |
Altitude: | c 450 m asl |
Surface area: | 30 km2 (wet season); 5 km2 (dry season) |
Depth: | 4 m (max., wet season); 2 m (min., dry season) |
Special feature: | Lake Keilak is an important watering place for cattle of nomads. |
Physical and chemical data (Jan. 1976) | |
Temperature: | 22.9°C |
Conductivity: | K20 550 μ S/cm |
pH: | 7.6–8.4 |
Transparency: | 44 cm Secchi disc |
Oxygen (saturation): | 83% at 10 cm; 86% at 1 m |
Fisheries data | |
Fish species: | Clarias lazera, Tilapia zillii and |
Schilbe mystus have been recorded. | |
Some fishing occurs. |
LAKE KUNDI
(data from Green, 1987)
Geographical data | |
Location: | Sudan - 10°26'N; 25° 10'E (see Fig. 4) |
Altitude: | c 450 m asl |
Surface area: | 12 km2 (wet season); 2–3 km2 (dry season) |
Depth: | 2 m (max) (Jan. 1976) |
Special features: | the population is generally sparse, but nomadic cattle herders pass through the area. |
Physical and chemical data (Jan. 1976) | |
Temperature: | 19.5°C |
Conductivity: | K20 110 μS/cm |
pH: | 7.0 |
Transparency: | 40 cm Secchi disc |
Oxygen (saturation): | 44% at 10 cm; 22% at 1 m |
Fisheries data | |
Fish species: | Clarias lazera, and Tilapia zillii have been recorded. |
(Stippling indicates approximate areas of permanent swamp.)
Fig. 5. MAP OF THE SOUTHERN SUDAN PLAINS
(showing the Sudd, Jonglei Canal and Lake No,
and Lake Ambadi in the Bahr El Ghazal system)
(after Bailey, 1987)
LAKE NO
(data from Green, 1987)
Geographical data | |
Location: | Sudan, 9°30'N; 30°37'E (see Figs. 4 and 5) |
Altitude: | 385 m asl |
Length: | about 10 km |
Width: | 2–5 km |
Depth: | max: about 9 m |
Special features: | junction of Bahr El Ghazal and Bahr El Jebel Rivers. |
Physical and chemical data | |
pH: | 7.1–7.8 |
Conductivity: | K20 = 200–250 μS/cm |
Transparency: | 30–60 cm Secchi disc |
Oxygen (saturation): | |
Dec. 1976 (at 27.5°C): 90% at 10 cm depth; 72% at 70 cm depth Jan. and Dec. 1954: 56–65% (Talling, 1957) | |
Fisheries data | |
Fish species: | main catches: Heterotis niloticus, Hydrocyon sp., Distichodus sp., Citharinus sp., Lates niloticus, Auchenoglanis sp., Synodontis sp. |
LAKE NYIROPO
Geographical data | |
Location: | Sudan |
Surface area: | 3.5 km2 |
Max. length: | 5 km |
Max. width: | 1 km |
LAKE YIROL
Geographical data | |
Location: | Sudan - 6°34'N; 30°30'E |
Surface area: | 8.4 km2 |
Max. length: | 6 km |
Max. width: | 2 km |
Inflowing river: | Yei |
BAHR EL GHAZAL RIVER
Geographical data | |||
Source: | Sudan (Congo-Zaire, Nile watershed) | ||
Total length: | 900 km | ||
Discharges to: | White Nile | ||
Volume of discharge at mouth: (Green, 1987) | |||
1–2 × 106 m3/day (mean) | |||
4 × 106 m3/day (in Oct.) | |||
8 × 106 m3/day (exceptionally) | |||
Physical and chemical data (Talling, 1957) | |||
Conductivity: | 550 μ S/cm | ||
pH: | 7.8 | ||
Ionic composition: | mg/l | ||
Cl | <2 | ||
Si | 18 | ||
NH3-N | 0.1 | ||
PO4-P | 0.02 |
BLUE NILE RIVER
(International water)
Geographical data (Welcomme, 1972) | |||
Source: | Lake Tana, Ethiopia | ||
Altitude: | 1 829 m asl | ||
Total length: | 1 460 km, of which 800–1 000 km are in Ethiopia | ||
Drainage area: | 325 000 km2 | ||
Countries traversed: | Ethiopia, Sudan | ||
Major tributaries: | Dinder, Rahad | ||
Volume of discharge at mouth: | |||
1 640 m3/sec (mean); | |||
170 (min) - 7 000 (max) m3/sec; | |||
145 × 106 m3/day | |||
Contributes 68% of summer flood (July-October) to Nile | |||
Discharges to: | Nile at Khartoum | ||
Special features: | Tissisat Falls, Fincha Reservoir on Finch'a-a River tributary (Ethiopia); Roseires and Sennar Reservoirs (Sudan). | ||
Physical and chemical data | |||
Ionic composition: | mg/l | ||
Na | 4.5–9.0 | ||
K | 1.1–2.9 | ||
Ca | 19.6–28.1 | ||
Mg | 4.9–6.4 | ||
Cl | 2.0–7.3 | ||
SiO2 | 16–24 | ||
μ g/l | |||
PO4-P | 2–120 | ||
NO3-N | 1–100 | ||
Fisheries data | |||
No. of fish species: | 22 | ||
No. of fishermen: | 582 in 1982 | ||
No. of boats: | 262 in 1982 |
CHARI RIVER
(International water)
Geographical data | (data mainly from Welcomme, 1972) | ||
Source: | The Chari River is formed from the confluence of several rivers, principally the Salamat, Bahr Aouk and Ouham Rivers. Northern sources are in Sudan. | ||
Total length: | 950 km | ||
Drainage area: | 600 000 km2 (N'Djamena) | ||
Countries traversed: | Cameroon, Chad, Central African Republic (Bahr Aouk, Ouham and many other tributaries), Sudan (Wadi Tirwal, Bahr Azoum) | ||
Discharges to: | Lake Chad | ||
Volume of discharge at mouth: 1 011–1 181 m3/sec | |||
Flood regime: | floods from July to February, maximum in October | ||
Special features: | the Chari has extensive floodplains along most of its course. The main areas are centered around the Salamat and Erguig Rivers. Total area of the Chari/Logone floodplains is about 90 000 km2. In Sudan, the Wadi Tirwal and Bahr Azoum Rivers, upper northern sources of Chari River, remain dry most of the time. | ||
Physical and chemical data | |||
Temperature: | 19.4–30.4°C | ||
Conductivity: | K24 42-73 μ S/cm | ||
pH: | 6.9–7.7 | ||
Ionic composition: | mg/l | ||
Na | 2.92 | ||
K | 1.84 | ||
Ca | 2.06 | ||
Mg | 0.94 | ||
CO3 | 31.5 | ||
Si(OH)4 | 22.2 | ||
Fisheries data | |||
Total annual catch: | The catch from the Chari/Logone system, which originates mainly from the Yaèrès floodplain (4 600 km2), was estimated (in the early 1960's) at 20 000–30 000 t from Cameroon and 35 000 t from Chad. These figures are frequently added to the production from Lake Chad (Blache & Miton, 1962). To this may be added 2 000 t from the Central African Republic tributaries to the Bahr Aouk and Ouham Rivers, and 20 000 t from the Salamat River, Bahr Aouk and associated swamps in Chad, for a total of 77 000 t. The status of this fishery changed during the Sahelian drought, when much of the plain was left unflooded. No catch in Sudan (drought situation). |
Fig. 6. RIVERS AND LAKES OF THE NILE SYSTEM
(Welcomme, 1972)
NILE RIVER
(International water)
Geographical data (Welcomme, 1979, if not otherwise specified) | |||
Source: | confluence of White Nile and Blue Nile at Khartoum | ||
Total length: | 3 800 km from Khartoum to mouth. The longest continuous stream measures 6 669 km: Nile, White Nile, Lake Victoria, Kagera River and Akanyaru River. 1 300 km in Egypt. (See Fig. 6) | ||
Drainage area: | 2 944 000 km2 (Welcomme, 1985); 2 000 000 km2 (Balarin, 1986) | ||
Area of water: | 1 160 km2 (in Egypt downstream from Aswan High Dam) | ||
Countries traversed: | Egypt, Sudan; the Nile Basin also extends into Burundi, Ethiopia, Kenya, Rwanda, Tanzania and Uganda | ||
Major tributaries: | Atbara, Blue Nile, White Nile (= Bahr El Jebel + Sobat) | ||
Contribution of tributaries to total Nile flow: | |||
Average (%) | During flood (%) | ||
Blue Nile | 59 | 68 | |
White Nile | |||
Sobat | 14 | 22 | |
Bahr El Jebel | 14 | 5 | |
Atbara | 13 | 5 | |
Discharges to: | Mediterranean Sea through a delta consisting of the Damietta and Rosetta arms | ||
Volume of discharge at mouth: | |||
2 832 m3/sec; | |||
45 to 150 109m3/yr (Hefny, 1982) (See Fig. 7) | |||
Suspended silt load: | |||
124 × 106 t/yr (Welcomme, 1985); | |||
134 × 106 t/yr (Hefny, 1982), deposited in Nasser/Nubia Reservoir; | |||
only 1.5-4% discharged downstream (Balarin, 1986) | |||
Special features: | the cataracts, Nasser/Nubia Reservoir (Aswan High Dam). |
Fisheries data
No. of fish species: 81 (Boulenger, 1907)
Total annual catch and effort:
Year | Total catch (t) | No. of boats |
Egyptian waters below Aswan High Dam: | ||
1963 | 1 200 | 1 049 |
1964 | 1 100 | 1 100 |
1965 | 1 600 | 1 300 |
1966 | 2 000 | 1 320 |
1967 | 2 900 | 1 500 |
1968 | 4 400 | 1 900 |
1969 | 4 800 | 1 950 |
1970 | 8 900 | 2 029 |
1971 | 8 900 | 2 069 |
1972 | 8 700 | 2 313 |
1973 | 8 000 | 2 640 |
1974 | 7 500 | 3 440 |
1975 | 8 600 | 3 894 |
1976 | 8 600 | 4 421 |
1977 | 7 600 | 4 948 |
1978 | 8 300 | 5 475 |
1979 | 9 000 | 6 002 |
Nile, irrigation canals and aquaculture (Welcomme, 1979): | ||
1976 | 15 000 | - |
Sudan: No catch data available. |
Potential annual yield:
in Egypt:
20 000 t/yr (Sadek, 1984)
225 kg/ha/yr (Sadek, 1984)
in Sudan:
no data available.
Fig. 7. ANNUAL FLOW REGIMES OF THE NILE RIVER, 1955–1980
(Balarin, 1986)
SOBAT RIVER
(International water)
Geographical data | |||
Source: | northeastern Uganda (Kidepo tributary) | ||
Altitude: | 2 230 m asl | ||
Total length: | 775 km | ||
Countries traversed: | Sudan, Uganda, Ethiopia (Baso and Akobo tributaries) | ||
Major tributaries: | Baso, Khawr Machar, Pibor, Akobo, Khaur Veveno, Kangen, Kidepo | ||
Discharges to: | White Nile River | ||
Volume of discharge at mouth: 37 × 106 m3/day (Welcomme, 1972) | |||
Special features: | large swamp/floodplain complexes (4 000 km2 in Ethiopia on Baro River) associated with most tributaries, including the Kenamuke and Kobowen Swamps on the Kangen River. | ||
Physical and chemical data | |||
Conductivity: | K20 112 μ S/cm | ||
pH: | 6.8 | ||
Ionic composition: (Talling, 1957) | |||
mg/l | |||
Ca | 8.7 | ||
Cl | 2.0 | ||
SO4 | 1.5 | ||
SiO2 | 12.0 | ||
PO4-P | 0.045 | ||
NO3-N | 0.015 | ||
NH3-N | 0.02 |
WHITE NILE RIVER
(International water)
(data mainly from Welcomme, 1972)
The White Nile changes its name several times in its course. From Lake Victoria to Lake Albert it is known as the Victoria Nile. From Lake Albert to the Uganda border it is known as the Albert Nile; from the Sudan to its confluence with the Bahr El Ghazal it is called the Bahr El Jebel; and down to its confluence with the Blue Nile it is finally called the White Nile or Bahr al Abiad. (See Fig. 6.)
Geographical data | |
Source: | Owen Falls Dam, Uganda |
Altitude: | 1 136 m |
Total length: | 2 084 km |
Countries traversed: | Sudan, Uganda |
Major tributaries: | Aswa, Bahr el Ghazal, Sobat, Semliki (via Lake Albert), Kagera (via Lake Victoria) |
Discharges to: | Nile at Khartoum |
Volume of discharge at mouth: 71 × 106 m3/day | |
The White Nile contributes 10% of the total flow during the summer floods and 83% at low water. | |
Special features: | Lake Kyoga, Kaba lega, Murchison Falls, Lake Albert (Uganda), Sudd Swamps (70 000 km2), Jebel Aulia Reservoir (Sudan). |
Physical and chemical data (Talling, 1957)
Distance from source: (Lake Victoria) | ||||
800 km | 1 200 km | 2 000 km | ||
Conductivity: K20 | 180–230 μ S/cm | 190–240 μ S/cm | 150–180 μ S/cm | |
pH: | 7.9 | 7.1–7.3 | 7.2–7.8 | |
Ionic composition: | mg/l | mg/l | mg/l | |
Ca | 7.0 | 7.0–9.0 | 8.0–10.0 | |
SiO2 | 2.5–5.0 | 4.0–5.5 | 7.5–11.5 | |
Fe | 0.1–0.3 | 0.4–1.4 | 0.2–0.7 | |
Cl | 7.0–10.0 | 6.0–11.0 | 2.0–6.0 | |
SO4 | 5.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | |
NO3-N | 0.02–0.06 | 0.01–0.06 | 0.01–0.10 | |
NH3-N | 0.02–0.04 | 0.04–0.08 | 0.04–0.07 | |
PO4-P | 0.04–0.06 | 0.02–0.09 | 0.04–0.09 |
SUDD SWAMP
Geographical data (data from Bailey, 1987) | ||
Location: | Sudan - 6° -9°30'N; 30° -32°'E (see Fig. 5) | |
Altitude: | 380–448 m | |
Surface area: | - premanently inundated area, downstream Mongalla: | |
c. 3 000 km2 in 1950–52 (low discharges) | ||
16 500 km2 in 1980 (current period of high river flow) | ||
- seasonal floodplain downstream Mongalla: | ||
c. 11 000 km2 in 1950–52 | ||
c. 15 500 km2 in 1980 | ||
Very little water returns to the permanent aquatic system from the eastern floodplain which rapidly dries out, except for some pools which may persist into the dry season. | ||
Max. length: | 450 km (permanent swamp) | |
Max. width: | 150 km (mean: 50 km) (permanent swamp) | |
Depth: | in the main channel: 5–7 m (mean); 10 m (max.) | |
Inflowing rivers: | Bahr El Jebel (= White Nile), Bahr al Ghazal | |
Mean annual inflow into swamp at Mongalla: (Bahr El Jebel) | ||
1905–1960: 26.8 × 109 m3 | ||
1961–1980: 50.3 × 109 m3 | ||
Outflowing river: | Bahr Al Abyad (= White Nile) | |
Mean annual outflow from swamp at Malakal (excluding Sobat discharge): | ||
1905–1960: 14.1 × 109 m3 | ||
1961–1980: 21.4 × 109 m3 | ||
The marked diminution in volume at the end of the swamps relative to the inflow is indicative of the high evaporative losses which occur in the Sudd. | ||
Special features: (Bailey, 1987) | ||
When it becomes operational, the Jonglei Canal will subject the Sudd to a major, man-induced manipulation. Its path is shown in Fig. 5. The canal, 360 km long, c. 50 m wide and 4 m deep, will divert 20–25 million cubic metres of the daily flow of the Bahr el Jebel around the swamp and return it to the Nile at the Sobat confluence. Primarily intended to conserve water for irrigation, the navigable canal and its accompanying all-weather road, will also greatly improve communications in the area. At the same time the operational canal must bring about a shift in the distribution and areas of the wetland zones. The available predictions suggest that the swamps will shrink in area by 21–25% and the floodplains by 14–17%. However, only if the Nile discharge into the Sudan Plains reverts to its pre-1961 levels, or abstraction is doubled by the construction of a second canal, will the wetland suffer drastic reduction. |
Physical and chemical data in main channels
(from several authors, cited in Bailey, 1987)
(high variations occur between dry and wet seasons)
Temperature: | 22–30°C (surface) | |
pH: | 6.7–8.4 | |
Oxygen (saturation): | 10–87% | |
Conductivity: | K20 150–360 μS/cm | |
Transparency: | 17–120 cm (Secchi) | |
Ionic composition: | Ca | 4–9 mg/l |
Mg | 3–10 mg/l | |
Cl | 3–12 mg/l | |
Si | 1–14 mg/l | |
SO4 | 0.5–10.0 mg/l | |
Fe | 50–1 300 μg/l | |
PO4-P | 5–140 μg/l | |
NO3 | 6–60 μg/l | |
NH3-N | 6–110 μg/l | |
Fisheries data | ||
No. of fish species: about 100 species (Sandon, 1950), including | ||
31 Siluroids, 16 characoids, 14 cyprinoids, 11 mormynids, 8 cichlids and 7 cyprinodontids. | ||
Main catches: | Distichodus sp., Citharinus sp., Heterotis niloticus, tilapias, Lates sp., Gymnarchus sp., large mormyrids, large catfishes, large characids and Labeo sp. (Bailey, 1987). | |
No. of fishermen: | 1 000 in 1978; 2 000 in 1982 | |
No. of boats: | 1 250 in 1982 | |
Total annual catch: | 11 000 t (1976); 6 000 t (1977); 1 000 t (1982). | |
Potential annual yield: | ||
75 000–100 000 t/yr (Balarin, 1988) | ||
37 000–400 000 t/yr (50 kg/ha for 80 000 km2) (FAO, 1982) | ||
below 100 000 t/yr (Bailey, 1987) |
JEBEL AULIA RESERVOIR
Geographical data (mainly Welcomme, 1972, 1979) | |||
Location: | Sudan - 15° 12'N; 32° 27'E (Figs. 1 and 2) | ||
Altitude: | 377 m | ||
Date closed: | 1937 | ||
Surface area: | 600–1 500 km2 | ||
Length: | 500 km (George et al., 1985) | ||
Depth: | 12 m (max); 2.3–6 m (mean) | ||
Volume: | 3.5 km3 | ||
Major inflowing river: | White Nile | ||
Physical and chemical data (Welcomme, 1972) | |||
Surface temperature: 21.0–29.5°C | |||
Dissolved solids: | 180 mg/l dam end | ||
120 mg/l river end | |||
pH: | 9.2 dam end | ||
7.5 river end (Brook & Rzoska, 1954) | |||
8.0–8.3 centre (Talling, 1957) | |||
Ionic composition: | (Talling, 1957) | ||
mg/l | |||
Ca | 8–11 | ||
CaCO3 | 65–70 | ||
Cl | 3–7 | ||
SO4 | 1 | ||
SiO2 | 6.11 | ||
Fe | 0.1–0.5 | ||
NO3-N | 0.02–0.06 | ||
NH3-N | 0.04–0.06 | ||
PO4-P | 0.04–0.10 | ||
Fisheries data | |||
No. of fishermen: | 1 500 (1975); 1 594 (1982) | ||
No. of boats: | 550 (1975); 544 (1982) | ||
Total annual catch: | |||
circa 8 000 t (1975) (Henderson, 1975) | |||
8 216 t (1982) | |||
Potential annual yield: | |||
15 000 t (100 kg/ha/yr) (Henderson, 1975) | |||
4 500 t (30 kg/ha/yr) (George et al., 1985; FAO, 1982) |
KHASHM EL GIRBA RESERVOIR
Geographical data (Welcomme, 1979; Henderson, 1975) | |
Location: | Sudan - 14° 55'N; 35° 54'E (see Fig. 2, p.160) |
Date closed: | 1964 |
Surface area: | 125 km2 |
Max. length: | 59 km |
Max. width: | 3 km |
Mean depth: | 6.8 m |
Volume: | 0.85–1.3 × 109 m3 (CSTR, 1982; Ibrahim, 1984) |
Major inflowing river: | Atbara |
Outflowing river: | Atbara |
Fisheries data | |
No. of fishermen: | 100 (1975); 94 (1982) |
No. of boats: | 40 (1975); 31 (1982) |
Total annual catch: | |
500 t (1975) | |
800 t (1982) (George et al., 1985; FAO, 1982) | |
Potential annual yield: | |
860 t (69 kg/ha/yr) (Henderson, 1975) |