FAO Fisheries Report No. 00

FAO FISHERIES TECHNICAL PAPER     358

Rapid rural appraisal, participatory rural appraisal and aquaculture

by
Philip Townsley
Consultant
Viterbo, Italy

FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS
Rome, 1996

Table of Contents


The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.


M-44
ISBN 92-5-103871-6


All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. Applications for such permission, with a statement of the purpose and extent of the reproduction, should be addressed to the Director, Information Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, 00100 Rome, Italy.

© FAO 1996

PREPARATION OF THIS DOCUMENT

The Fishery Resources Division of the FAO Fisheries Department regularly publishes technical documentation relevant for the promotion of sustainable fisheries and aquaculture development. This document has been prepared in response to increasing interest and enquiries from people working in aquaculture regarding Rapid Rural Appraisal and Participatory Rural Appraisal. The document is intended for both field workers and planners involved in aquaculture development, whether in inland or coastal areas. Comments and suggestions would be appreciated and should be sent to the Fishery Resources Officer (Aquatic Environment), Inland Water Resources and Aquaculture Service (FIRI), Fisheries Department, FAO, Rome.

This document was prepared by Philip Townsley, under the guidance and suggestions of M. Martinez-Espinosa and U. Barg of the Inland Water Resources and Aquaculture Service, FAO Fisheries Department, and after discussions with many other FAO staff members, as well as with E. Harrison from the University of Sussex, U.K.

Distribution:

Directors of Fisheries and Aquaculture
FAO Regional Fisheries Commissions and Working Groups
Aquaculture (Marine and Freshwater)
FAO Fisheries Department
FAO Regional Fishery Officers
FAO Sustainable Rural Development Division
FAO Extension Division
FAO Inter-Departmental Working Group on Environment and Sustainable Development
Network of Aquaculture Centres in Asia and Pacific Region (NACA)
Aquaculture for Local Community Development Programme (ALCOM)
Inland and coastal aquaculture development projects executed by FAO
Interested international organizations and institutions

Townsley, P.
Rapid rural appraisal, participatory rural appraisal and aquaculture.
FAO Fisheries Technical Paper. No. 358. Rome, FAO. 1996. 109p.
 
ABSTRACT
This document is intended for aquaculture development specialists, aquaculture project managers, and officials and specialists involved in the planning and management of aquaculture activities. It is intended to provide an introduction to Rapid Rural Appraisal (RRA) and Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) for people working in these fields. The principal components of these two approaches to information collection and planning are described along with the various tools used with a case study to illustrate their use and some of the issues they raise. Possible applications of the approaches for those involved in aquaculture development are given and an outline provided of the sorts of planning and institutional context where they can best be applied. The problems and shortcomings of the approaches are also discussed and guidelines given for the use of alternative approaches to information gathering and planning.

CONTENTS


1.       INTRODUCTION

2.       RRA FOR SMALL WATER BODY DEVELOPMENT IN SOUTHERN AFRICA : A CASE STUDY

2.1     ALCOM and small water bodies in Southern Africa

2.2     Why RRA ?

2.3     Trying out the RRA approach

2.4     RRA techniques

2.5     RRA findings

2.6     “Aquaculture” RRAs

3.       WHAT IS RAPID RURAL APPRAISAL ?

3.1     RRA guidelines

3.2     “Participation” and RRA

3.3     RRA tools : an overview

3.4     Strengths and weaknesses of RRA

3.5     RRA and formal surveys

3.6     RRAs : the sequence and timing of activities

3.7     RRA teams

4.       TYPES OF RRA

4.1     Exploratory RRAs

4.2     Topical RRAs

4.3     Monitoring and evaluation RRAs

4.4     “Participatory” RRAs

5.       ADDRESSING AQUACULTURE ISSUES WITH RRA

5.1     Land and water tenure

5.2     Environmental factors

5.3     Seasonality

5.4     Target group identification

5.5     Social and cultural factors

5.6     Gender issues

5.7     Age issues

5.8     Institutional issues

5.9     Markets and demand

5.10   Fisheries credit and marketing systems

5.11   Food or cash

5.12   Labour and time use

5.13   Conclusion

6.       PARTICIPATORY RURAL APPRAISAL

6.1     PRA or “Participatory” RRA

6.2     PRA - tools and process

6.3     Advantages and disadvantages of PRA

6.4     Is there such a thing as an “aquaculture” PRA ?

6.5     PRA teams

7.       RRA, PRA AND AQUACULTURE PLANNING

7.1     Sectoral development planning

7.2     Integrated development planning

7.3     Participatory development planning

7.4     Incorporating RRA and PRA into aquaculture development planning

8.       CONCLUSION

BIBLIOGRAPHY

APPENDIX 1     - THE HISTORY OF RRA AND PRA

APPENDIX 2     - RRA TOOLS

LIST OF TABLES

1.     Disciplines, institutions and gender breakdown for RRA teams on 3 small water bodies in Zimbabwe

2.     Land and water tenure - RRA tools

3.     Environmental factors - RRA tools

4.     Seasonality - RRA tools

5.     Target-group identification - RRA tools

6.     Social and cultural factors - RRA tools

7.     Gender issues - RRA tools

8.     Institutional issues - RRA tools

9.     Markets and demand - RRA tools

10.   Fisheries credit and marketing systems - RRA tools

11.   Food or cash - RRA tools

12.   Labour and time-use - RRA techniques

13.   RRA and PRA for aquaculture : sectoral planning framework

14.   RRA and PRA for aquaculture : integrated planning framework

15.   Participatory planning framework

LIST OF FIGURES

1.     Sketch map of area around Chichewo Dam, Zimbabwe

2.     Distance chart of communities utilising Taru Dam, Zimbabwe

3.     Transect of Funye River catchment area, near Chichewo Dam, Zimbabwe

4.     Historical transect of Funye River catchment area, near Chichewo Dam, Zimbabwe

5.     Ranking of preferences for different fish species: Mwenje Dam, Zimbabwe

6.     Seasonal calendar showing availability of fish, vegetables and wild foods, Taru Dam, Zimbabwe

7.     Seasonal daily activity charts for men and women, Dzinavene village, Zimbabwe

8.     Timeline illustrating historical changes at Taru Dam, Zimbabwe

9.     Venn diagramme showing institutions and agencies concerned with dam management at Mwenje Dam, Zimbabwe

10.   RRA Tools

11.   Formal Survey Methods

12.   The PRA Process

13.   Sectoral Planning Mechanisms for Aquaculture

14.   Integrated Planning Mechanisms for Aquaculture

15.   Participatory Planning Mechanisms for Aquaculture

LIST OF BOXES

1.     RRA guidelines

2.     RRA guidelines for aquaculturists

3.     Adopting RRA techniques to local circumstances

4.     RRA in Bangladesh

5.     A “typical” RRA sequence

6.     RRA team - key questions

7.     Uses of exploratory RRAs

8.     Uses of topical RRAs

9.     Uses of monitoring and evaluation RRAs

10.   Changes in land tenure in Tanzania

11.   Aquaculture impacts on women in Bangladesh

12.   Potential differences between RRA and PRA

13.   PRA in India


How to Order