8. Local and exotic breeds
Many co-operative programmes to improve small animal production are based on the idea that good results can be obtained simply by transferring genetics. This is the biological equivalent of transferring technology. When the problem of fitness is posed, improvements through crossbreeding are frequently considered the best approach. The easy syllogism on which these ideas are based, is that since improved exotic breeds or hybrids are more productive in developed Countries, it is sufficient to introduce them, or part of their germplasm, to increase their output in developing Countries. Unfortunately it is not true that improved breeds or technologies can be valuable whatever the environmental and socio-economic conditions. Only if these are favourable are the results likely to be positive. A commonly observed constraint is that animals or eggs are sold as an item and not by weight. Local breeds can even be sold at higher prices because of their specific ritual use for sacrifices. When analysing the market it is therefore necessary to take this into account and ascertain in advance if exotic breeds can or cannot compete on these terms. If climate is not a constraint and sanitary, nutritional and marketing conditions are favourable, the move to improved production systems, adopting exotic breeds, is generally a natural process not needing any external stimulus. Unfortunately, measuring the success of a project among low-food, no-income people is often carried out immediately after its termination when equipment and animals have only just been distributed so that production can begin. At this stage there has been no time to assess the impact of the external stimulus and a project may wrongly be considered successful.
This matter will be discussed in Chapter 18 (Testing success) but it is obvious that the sustainability of a project can often be assessed very quickly, without waiting months or years. Frequently elements of failure can be deduced directly from the description of the general conditions or from some peculiarity of the project. Improved breeds or hybrids are generally imported. If the replacement rate of culled animals is not considered, the project will quickly end because poor people have neither the economic nor technical means to import new animals.
The same can be said about vaccines or medicines. They are not available in rural areas and are rather expensive from town pharmacies, which sell in relatively large quantities. The low number of doses needed would mean that the majority of medicines would be wasted. In any case, no poor people buy a medicine to protect their animals when they have no means to cure their own children. Exotic animals are also demanding in terms of nutrition. Balanced feed, if available, would need to be bought. In rural areas feeding animals with expensive feedstuffs is only possible if production can be sold profitably at the market. In fact exotic breeds are only usually found in the peri-urban areas and are mostly kept by people who have some education and other income. Suitability to the environment is generally low amongst exotic breeds, which have no chance when competing in natural conditions against local breeds. They are also larger, more exigent on feed quantity and quality and more sensitive to heat and sickness. Getting bigger eggs from exotic breeds is better than getting smaller eggs from Deshi (local) hens (figure 8.1.), but to get smaller eggs is better than collecting no eggs at all from exotic breeds.
The analysis of the system must help to decide if it is advisable to try and improve housing and management of local breeds to get more small eggs or whether it is preferable to improve genetics by introducing more productive but more exigent exotic breeds. Sometimes smaller eggs from local breeds receive a higher price than bigger eggs.
Many different reasons can explain the failure. For instance preference can be given to the brooding of small eggs or local birds brood better. But probably the true reason is that RIR chicks or cross breeds are not able to survive. The original cocks, in fact, soon died. When ambient temperature begins to increase, heavier birds tend to stop scavenging and sit panting in the shade whereas smaller, slim, local birds still go around looking for food. Similarly, in the afternoon local chickens begin to scavenge earlier than the exotic birds. In these conditions it is easy to understand that these more exigent heavier birds, cannot cover their basic nutritional needs, let alone put on weight or lay eggs.
In figure 126.96.36.199. a flock is shown as an example of improving production through the substitution of local with exotic birds. Projects have also been based on the use of hybrids. This is not advisable because brooding capability is lost and dependence upon industrial units and importation becomes permanent. In any case light breeds are generally more suited to harsh environments. They are less exigent, more dynamic, more thermo-tolerant and, to a certain extent, can adapt to scavenging. A lighter body weight and a more dynamic attitude to scavenging makes it easier to cover their basic nutritional needs. Where a hot climate and insufficient feeding are limiting factors, Leghorn-derived breeds are more suitable (figure 8.2.) and may also be utilised to improve the genetic pool of local strains.
The use of hybrids is less dangerous in rabbits. In this case animals are simply mated among themselves and with the next generations. A lot of different morphological types are produced and, at the end, the fittest are naturally selected. If living conditions are difficult it will be seen that, of the exotic or hybrids introduced, only those animals similar to the local breeds will remain. These local breeds are in fact nothing other than animals previously imported that have undergone a local natural selection imposed by the harsh environment and scarce nutrition. Figure 8 3. shows how smaller local (Baladi means local) rabbits show a better thermo-tolerance compared with NZW (Finzi et al., 1992c). This is a very important fitness trait in tropical countries.
Exotic breeds are often considered more efficient because the interaction with the new environment is not taken into account, or it is artificially controlled in an unsustainable way. If a comparison is made with local breeds, it is generally performed by the experimental centres in artificial conditions. Frequently the tests are limited to the first production cycle, may be in the most favourable season, and mortality is rarely considered. But tests should always be performed in field conditions (housing, feeding and management) or by simulating field conditions. They should last at least one year, and also consider substitution rate and marketing problems. Local experts frequently prefer to choose from heavy breeds (Flanders Giant and Bouscat Giant). They think that bigger animals give more meat. This is true with reference to the growing period, but heavy breeds are not competitive with medium size animals, which are raised in the industrial farms, the latter being more efficient in reproduction rate, prolificacy and feed conversion. The main problem is that their value in terms of breeding is practically impossible to ascertain. The only opportunity is when just one or few bucks are kept, and then phenotypic selection is based on maternal traits. Recording of reproduction data must be put into practice in the simplest way, by registering all of those weaned in order to calculate their number based on 100 or 365 days. The figure obtained can be utilised as a selection index, which to be reliable, should represent three or more weanings. The simplest option is to start with the animals that are already present (whatever they are) and begin to introduce a selection procedure. Breeding should take place in the natural environmental and nutritional conditions, so that both production and fitness are maximised in relation to the specific local situation. If the work begins with local strains, it is likely that output will be improved, and fitness maintained. In the case of exotic breeds, it is likely that output will decrease but fitness will be improve to reach a sustainable level of production. Anyway this is a more expensive and more risky possibility because the imported animals may easily die. This kind of selection, based on natural and managerial factors, is very slow but permits a gradual adaptation to specific production conditions (Hammond and Galal, 1999). The same can be said for all the domestic species. The best rule is to look at the morphology of local breeds or strains and choose breeds with a similar body conformation. Generally speaking, smaller animals with an elongated body shape and wide ears or wattles show a better fitness in rural conditions. If the environment can be artificially controlled and marketing conditions are favourable, any breed or hybrid can be adopted. But this matter bears no relation to food security problems in the sense that the word security is used here. Breeding or demonstration centres generally utilise exotic breeds fed with balanced feedstuffs. But when these animals are distributed in rural areas it needs to be shown that they can remain competitive with local strains. It is well known that a reduction in body size is a good indication of successful biological adaptation to difficult environmental conditions. Other fitness traits are probably present in local strains. For instance they have a better thermo-regulation, and are able to maintain a lower body temperature in the stressful midday heat of tropical countries (Finzi et al. 1992b).