in situ Conservation and
Development: 4. Promoting in situ conservation of wild crop relatives and wild plants for food production
|
Country |
Actions taken since mid-1995/Sources of founding |
Constrains/Needs |
Opportunities |
Support required from regional & international organizations |
| East & South Mediterranean |
| Algeria |
| |
Information not available |
| Cyprus |
| |
No measures taken as yet |
Not mentioned |
Submission of project proposals at regional level |
Promoting and encouraging joint activities by developing joint projects |
| Egypt |
|
|
· One of the 3 projects (Germplasm for Arid Land) might deal specifically with this subject
· International funding |
Not mentioned |
Regional collaboration |
Financial and technical assistance |
| Jordan |
|
|
Information not available |
| Lebanon |
| |
Information not available |
| Libya |
|
|
Information not available |
| Malta |
| |
Not mentioned |
Not mentioned |
Not mentioned |
Not mentioned |
| Morocco |
| |
Attention of the concerned National Services was drawn up on the necessity of taking into account wild crop relatives in the management plans of the protected areas (study in 1994)
|
Lack of funds to implement the management plans of the protected areas |
Not mentioned |
Technical and financial assistance for implementing the management plan of protected areas
|
| Palestine |
| |
· Through implementation of several regional projects related to the Peace process initiatives
· International funds |
Technical assistance |
Development of Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan |
Financial and Technical assistance
|
| Syria |
| |
· Efficient measures are taken through supporting, protecting & providing work inputs for reserves
· Conservation of endangered species initiated by ICARDA
· National and international funding |
Financial constraints
|
· Integration with forest and animal genetic resources
· Regional and international collaboration |
Financial and technical support
|
| Tunisia |
| |
Not mentioned |
Not mentioned |
Not mentioned |
Not mentioned
|
| Turkey |
| |
Establishment of in situ Gene Management Zones (GMZ) for conserving wild crop relatives |
Not mentioned |
Not mentioned |
Not mentioned
|
| |
| West Asia |
| Afghanistan |
| |
Not mentioned |
Not mentioned |
Not mentioned |
Not mentioned
|
| Bahrain |
|
|
Information not available |
| Iran |
|
|
Information not available |
| Iraq |
|
|
Information not available |
| Kuwait |
|
|
Information not available |
| Oman |
| |
· Three royal decrees issued for natural protection in national parks
· No substantial work has been done after 1995 due to financial limitations
|
· Qualified national personnel in plant genetic resources · Financial constraints
|
Not in immediate future |
Financial and technical supports
|
| Pakistan |
| |
Biodiversity Action Plan (Plan) prepared |
Lack of funding to implement the BAP |
The BAP implementation will: Strengthen the in situ conservation of wild crop relatives |
Financial support
|
| Qatar |
| |
Not mentioned |
Not mentioned
|
Not mentioned |
Not mentioned
|
| Saudi Arabia |
|
|
Information not available |
| United Arab Emirates |
|
|
Information not available |
| Yemen |
|
|
Information not available |
| |
| Central Asia |
| Armenia |
|
|
Information not available |
| Azerbaijan |
| |
Not mentioned |
Not mentioned
|
Not mentioned |
Not mentioned
|
| Kazakhstan |
|
|
Information not available |
| Kyrgyz Republic |
|
|
Information not available |
| Tajikstan |
|
|
Information not available |
| Uzbekistan |
| |
Wild relatives and wild species have been studied and recommended for introduction in Botanical Gardens
|
Not mentioned
|
Not mentioned |
Not mentioned
|