Ex situ Conservation: 6. Regenerating threatened ex situ accessions
|
Country |
Actions taken since mid-1995/Sources of founding |
Constrains/Needs |
Opportunities |
Support required from regional & international organizations |
| East & South Mediterranean |
| Algeria |
| |
Information not available |
| Cyprus |
| |
Regeneration activities conducted every year |
Not mentioned |
Submission of project proposals at regional level |
Promoting and encouraging joint activities by developing joint projects |
| Egypt |
|
|
Activities were very limited |
Lack of funds |
· Strengthening national collaboration
· Training
|
Financial and technical assistance |
| Jordan |
|
|
Information not available |
| Lebanon |
| |
Information not available |
| Libya |
|
|
Information not available |
| Malta |
| |
Not applicable |
Not mentioned |
Not mentioned |
Not mentioned |
| Morocco |
| |
· Most of accessions are maintained by regeneration (see n° 5)
· National funding |
· Lack of National genebank
· Very costly process
· Additional funds needed |
Regional collaboration within WANA |
Financial and technical assistance
|
| Palestine |
| |
Not applicable |
| Syria |
| |
Multiplication of field crop accession are done periodically |
Not mentioned |
Not mentioned |
Not mentioned
|
| Tunisia |
| |
· Most field crops are regenerated annually
· National funding |
Not mentioned
|
Not mentioned |
Not mentioned
|
| Turkey |
| |
Regeneration of threatened species
|
Not mentioned |
Not mentioned |
Not mentioned
|
| West Asia |
| Afghanistan |
| |
No action taken |
Repatriation of the existing ex situ collection and its regeneration and use for selection |
Not mentioned |
· Financial and technical support
· Assistance in repatriation of germplasm
|
| Bahrain |
|
|
Information not available |
| Iran |
|
|
Information not available |
| Iraq |
|
|
Information not available |
| Kuwait |
|
|
Information not available |
| Oman |
| |
No substantial work has been done due to financial limitations and non-existence of genebank |
· Funds are needed for provision of laboratory and regeneration facilities (incubators, growth chambers, etc.)
· Financial constraints |
Not in immediate future |
Financial support from regional and international organization for any further programmes or continuing existing programmes
|
| Pakistan |
| |
· 16000 accessions of all crop were rejuvenated and stored in the new genebank
· International and national funding |
Need for additional funding |
Better conservation |
Financial support
|
| Qatar |
| |
Not mentioned |
Not mentioned
|
Not mentioned |
Not mentioned
|
| Saudi Arabia |
|
|
Information not available |
| United Arab Emirates |
|
|
Information not available |
| Yemen |
|
|
Information not available |
| |
| Central Asia |
| Armenia |
|
|
Information not available |
| Azerbaijan |
| |
Accessions are regenerated when necessary |
Insufficient funding |
Not mentioned |
Financial support to carry out this activity
|
| Kazakhstan |
|
|
Information not available |
| Kyrgyz Republic |
|
|
Information not available |
| Tajikstan |
|
|
Information not available |
| Uzbekistan |
| |
Accessions are regenerated when necessary
|
Insufficient funding |
Not mentioned |
Financial support to carry out this activity
|