Central and West Asia and North Africa Regional Meeting Report

Funding issues

45. Several existing funding sources can be identified:
- Multilateral donor (e.g. GEF, World Bank, UNDP etc.; Islamic Development Bank etc.)
- Bilateral donors and foundations
-National funding sources
-Private sector sources
It was noted that some multilateral intergovernmental and other technical institutions (e.g. FAO, IPGRI, ICARDA and other CGIAR centres, ACSAD, AOAD and COMSTECH) are not donor organizations, and that their resources are limited. However, they can be partners in facilitating funding.

46. In order to facilitate funding of countries' implementation of the GPA it was proposed that efforts should be made:
- to secure funding from environment-oriented funds (e.g. GEF) for GPA activities, including ex situ conservation and utilization. The increased opportunities provided following the consideration of agrobiodiversity by the CBD was noted.
- to ensure that GPA/PGR activities are recognized as a priority by national authorities (essential both for domestic funding, and for foreign funding). In this context the importance of (i) integrating PGR into development plans / national priorities, and (ii) of the need to raise awareness amongst decision makers, was recognized.
- to develop proposals that are competitive; and
- to develop appropriate partnerships with the private sector.

47. WANANET and CAN/PGR, through facilitating collaboration between countries, should play a greater role in convincing potential donors to provide funds for projects with clear objectives and applicable in many countries.

48. As part of the review of implementation of the GPA, and in line with the Leipzig Report, FAO is requested to monitor funding for implementation of the GPA through existing multilateral and bilateral channels, to cooperate with funding agencies, and to develop criteria and guidelines to facilitate funding through all channels. FAO was also requested to prepare an information document on the importance of PGRFA and the need for funding of PGRFA activities. This document should be made available to the funding agencies.

49. The approach proposed by FAO to develop a multi-donor Programme to facilitate implementation of the GPA was supported. Participants were requested to provide further feedback to FAO as part of the consultative process.

50. It was noted that the establishment of an international fund for PGRFA was one of the matters under negotiation in the FAO Commission on Genetic Resources for food and agriculture as part of the revision of the International Undertaking. The participants recognized that the international fund would be an essential part of the final agreement, and urged the Commission to conclude the negotiations as soon as possible.

TOC