| Growing demand
for livestock products, increased competition, from both developing
and developed countries, and ever more sophisticated and changing
sets of domestic and international trade norms and standards
are putting increasing pressure on developing countries’
producers. In order to compete, cope and prosper under these
evolving market conditions, livestock producers need to be
able to constantly innovate. Moreover, to fully exploit the
poverty reduction potential of these livestock sector trends,
the capacity to respond and adapt to these changes needs to
be enhanced in ways that both allow producers to innovate
and at the same time safe-guards the livelihoods of poor people
linked with the sector. This is not simply a question of ensuring
that production and processing technology is made available
through adequate livestock research, extension and other support
services, but also includes the social and institutional arrangements
required to mobilise different sorts of knowledge and support
services in ways that create novelty on a continuous basis.
Innovation, as a driver of social and economic change, can
be of particular significance in the rural sector of developing
countries: It is where most of the poor live; it is where
major environmental resources are located; and it is where
the livelihoods of the most vulnerable communities are interlinked
- for better or worse - to rapid technological and market
changes that are transforming enterprises and services. Innovation,
once thought of as a research driven process, is now recognised
as an interactive process incorporating a much broader range
of activities, actors, practices, policies and contexts. Together
these different elements enable the creative use of both new
and existing knowledge, information and technology. Since
this involves the interaction of many actors with different
and competing agendas, governance issues need to be addressed
for innovation to lead socially desirable outcomes such as
poverty reduction and environmental sustainability.
The growing diversification of rural livelihood options into
non-farm activities and with the increasing interconnectedness
of rural areas and activities to the global environment is
radically changing rural economies. These changes in rural
economies are also characterised by a growing interconnectedness
and knowledge convergence among different areas of economic
and social activity, for example, the interconnection among
agriculture, food-processing and health, and the knowledge
convergence arising from generic scientific knowledge such
as gene technology, and generic process knowledge such as
governance approaches . The unique characteristics of this
new rural reality raise unexplored questions about the nature
of rural innovation capacity and the challenges this brings
to policy design and implementation. Such challenges concern
a need to create capacity to:
 |
combine expertise from
different science, technology and entrepreneurial domains
(livestock, agriculture, health, communication, banking,
etc.); |
 |
respond to rapidly changing
contexts (technical, market, policy, political and social);
and |
 |
recognise and address the
challenges and opportunities emanating from the interconnectedness
and knowledge convergence of different spheres of rural
activity. |
PPLPI is contributing to developing an understanding of these
issues in collaboration with the United Nations University
– Maastricht Economic and social Research and training
centre on Innovation and Technology (UNU-MERIT), through a
network of regional research and training hubs that facilitates
discussions amongst scholars, policymakers, development investors
and practitioners dealing with rural development.
The activities currently carried out by the PPLPI under the
‘Services, Institutional Change and Innovation Capacity’
theme focus specifically on:
| (i) |
how to build local capacities
to innovate through the embedding of scientific endeavours
into wider networks of economic agents, government agencies
and policy makers that collectively cause new technology
and knowledge to contribute to equitable wealth creation
and sustainable development; |
| (ii) |
the types of social and
institutional arrangements required to mobilise different
knowledge stocks and support services needed to enhance
the capacity of livestock sector actors to innovate in
response to sector dynamics and that at the same time
safeguard public health and the livelihoods of poor people
linked with the sector; |
| (iii) |
the design of tools to
apply and implement the types of approaches mentioned
in (i) and (ii) in development policy and practice. |
|