Indonesia had about 11 million beef cattle in 1995, and almost 12 million goats. Dairy cattle numbered approximately 330000. Over the period 1941 to 1997, and perhaps somewhat surprisingly for a Moslem country, the number of pigs increased more than seven times from 1296000 to over 9000000 (Figure 6).
Figure 6. Number of four footed animals, 1967 to 1997
The Indonesian government began to seriously pursue food self-sufficiency in 1964 (Soewardi and Atmadilaga 1982), and as noted already self-sufficiency in rice was achieved in the early 1980s. Improved practices developed at Bogor Agricultural University increased rice yields dramatically and led to the adoption of the Bimas or mass guidance program. A similar program was tried for livestock - the Bimas of Livestock. When first set up, this program focused on egg production and the fattening of beef cattle (Soewardi and Atmadilaga 1982). Indonesia has attempted to achieve its economic objectives through a series of five year development plans as well as longer term (25 year) plans that overlap with the five year plans. The timing of these and the livestock production associated with each are shown in Table 8.
Table 8. Meat, egg and milk production, 1969 to 1994
|
Five-year Plan
|
Year
|
Meat |
Egg |
Milk |
|
(kt) |
(kt) |
(kt) |
||
|
Repeleta I
|
1969 |
309.3 |
57.7 |
28.9 |
|
1970 |
313.6 |
58.6 |
29.3 |
|
|
1971 |
332.2 |
68.4 |
35.8 |
|
|
1972 |
366.2 |
77.5 |
37.7 |
|
|
1973 |
379.4 |
81.4 |
35.0 |
|
|
Repeleta II
|
1974 |
403.1 |
98.1 |
56.9 |
|
1975 |
435.0 |
112.2 |
51.1 |
|
|
1976 |
448.9 |
115.6 |
58.0 |
|
|
1977 |
467.7 |
131.4 |
60.7 |
|
|
1978 |
474.6 |
151.0 |
62.3 |
|
|
Repeleta III
|
1979 |
486.5 |
164.5 |
72.2 |
|
1980 |
571.3 |
262.6 |
78.4 |
|
|
1981 |
596.0 |
275.2 |
85.8 |
|
|
1982 |
628.5 |
297.0 |
117.6 |
|
|
1983 |
651.5 |
316.0 |
174.6 |
|
|
Repeleta IV
|
1984 |
742.2 |
355.3 |
179.0 |
|
1985 |
808.9 |
369.9 |
191.9 |
|
|
1986 |
879.0 |
437.2 |
220.2 |
|
|
1987 |
895.5 |
451.5 |
234.9 |
|
|
1988 |
937.0 |
443.1 |
264.9 |
|
|
Repeleta V
|
1989 |
971.1 |
456.2 |
338.2 |
|
1990 |
1027.7 |
484.0 |
345.6 |
|
|
1991 |
1099.2 |
510.4 |
360.2 |
|
|
1992 |
1239.2 |
572.3 |
367.2 |
|
|
1993 |
1378.3 |
572.9 |
387.5 |
|
|
Repeleta VI
|
1994 |
1492.9 |
668.6 |
426.7 |
|
1995(a) |
1564.3 |
728.8 |
432.9 |
Notes: (a) preliminary figuresWhen the First Development Plan (Repeleta I) was started in 1969, the livestock sector was traditional and meat production was about 309000 t. Eggs and milk production were 57700 t and 28900 t., respectively. Soewardi and Atmadilaga pointed out that increasing per person income levels in Indonesia, particularly since the beginning of the second Five year Development Plan in 1974, led to increased demand for livestock products. This increased demand resulted in the slaughter of many female cattle. The government allocated 5.1% of the total agricultural development budget to livestock in the second Five year Development Plan and 6.4% for the third Plan. In this plan, the government intended that the production of eggs, meat and milk should be increased to meet demand and that the population of ruminants should increase by 1% or 2% a year.
Source: Direktorat Jenderal Peternakan
Kristanto (1982) argued that cattle are an important part of the Indonesian economy. As evidence, he cited the fact that in 1973 about 13% of Indonesias smallholders, accounting for 60% of the total population, were engaged in cattle production and crop raising. Twenty years later in 1993, about 5600000 Indonesian households or about 26% of rural households were in livestock production. All but 291000 of Indonesias livestock households were classified as rural households. The number of households in livestock husbandry in 1993 was almost 27% above the number in 1983. Provinces where relatively large increases occurred were Lampung (the province on Sumatera located closest to the heavily populated province of West Java and Jakarta), Maluka (between Irian Jaya and Sulawesi) and Timor-Timur (Table 9).
In general the farm households involved in livestock production practice mixed farming, combining crops and livestock. For small farmers, livestock can provide benefits through sale of product and improved nutrition through increased consumption of meat, milk and eggs.[3] Livestock are also used for ritual and ceremonial occasions, and recreation.[4] Larger livestock - cattle and buffalo - are liquid assets that provide a hedge against inflation and can be converted to cash when the need arises.[5] The Food and Fertilizer Technology Center (1995) explains that investing in livestock enables small scale upland farmers in Asia to spread their risks and to use profits from good years to help survive the bad years. Animals are also seen as a way of recycling nutrients for cropland areas.
Table 9. Number of households engaged in animal husbandry by province
|
Province
|
Urban |
Rural |
Total |
Ratio of 1993/1983
|
|||
|
1983 |
1993 |
1983 |
1993 |
1983 |
1993 |
||
|
(000) |
(000) |
(000) |
(000) |
(000) |
(000) |
||
|
DI Aceh |
2 |
5 |
110 |
152 |
112 |
157 |
1.40 |
|
Sumatera Utara |
10 |
14 |
174 |
231 |
184 |
245 |
1.33 |
|
Sumatera Barat |
9 |
2 |
88 |
117 |
97 |
119 |
1.23 |
|
Riau |
2 |
5 |
37 |
68 |
39 |
73 |
1.87 |
|
Jambi |
1 |
1 |
40 |
47 |
41 |
48 |
1.17 |
|
Sumatera Selatan |
6 |
4 |
75 |
124 |
81 |
128 |
1.58 |
|
Bengkuku |
1 |
1 |
23 |
27 |
24 |
28 |
1.17 |
|
Lampung |
3 |
3 |
90 |
196 |
93 |
199 |
2.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DKI Jakarta |
4 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
1 |
0.25 |
|
Jawa Barat |
20 |
46 |
415 |
441 |
435 |
487 |
1.12 |
|
Jawa Tengah |
31 |
58 |
692 |
848 |
723 |
906 |
1.25 |
|
DI Yogyakarta |
4 |
25 |
97 |
128 |
101 |
153 |
1.51 |
|
Jawa Timur |
50 |
72 |
1232 |
1454 |
1282 |
1526 |
1.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bali |
5 |
10 |
161 |
195 |
166 |
205 |
1.23 |
|
Nusa Tenggara Barat |
6 |
6 |
135 |
163 |
141 |
169 |
1.20 |
|
Nusa Tenggara Timur |
3 |
6 |
184 |
243 |
187 |
249 |
1.33 |
|
Timor-Timur |
0 |
1 |
33 |
59 |
33 |
60 |
1.82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kalimantan Barat |
2 |
4 |
98 |
140 |
100 |
144 |
1.44 |
|
Kalimantan Tengah |
2 |
1 |
21 |
29 |
23 |
30 |
1.30 |
|
Kalimantan Selatan |
2 |
1 |
35 |
58 |
37 |
59 |
1.59 |
|
Kalimantan Timur |
5 |
3 |
18 |
34 |
23 |
37 |
1.61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sulawesi Utara |
3 |
4 |
72 |
87 |
75 |
91 |
1.21 |
|
Sulawesi Tengah |
1 |
2 |
56 |
66 |
57 |
68 |
1.19 |
|
Sulawesi Selatan |
9 |
9 |
306 |
301 |
315 |
310 |
0.98 |
|
Sulawesi Tenggara |
0 |
2 |
23 |
40 |
23 |
42 |
1.83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maluku |
2 |
2 |
21 |
41 |
23 |
43 |
1.87 |
|
Irian Jaya |
2 |
3 |
62 |
103 |
64 |
106 |
1.66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indonesia |
185 |
291 |
4298 |
5392 |
4483 |
5683 |
1.27 |
Source: Direktorat Jenderal PeternakanAbout 30% of households in the livestock industries in 1993 had six or more family members, while 25.5% had fewer than four household members. The most likely age category for the farmer was 40 to 59 years, and few (10%) had been educated beyond primary school (Table 10). For those with another source of income, in 78.1% of cases it was likely to be agriculture (Table 11). The family plays an important part in livestock industries since much of the responsibility for looking after the animals is given to the farmers spouse and children. As Nari (1992) explains, children in a West Java study were found to prefer to manage small animals and poultry rather than join their parents in cultivating crops. Children collected grasses from roadsides and vacant land as they returned home from school. In the dairy industry, the farmers spouse and children are responsible for delivering milk to collection points and for much of the day to day care of the cow (Hutabarat, Riethmuller, Sayaka, Smith and Yusdja 1996).
Table 10. Characteristics of Indonesian livestock producers, 1993
|
Item |
Number |
Percentage |
|
Household size |
||
|
< 4 |
1377817 |
25.5 |
|
4 - 5 |
2401156 |
44.5 |
|
6 - 7 |
1224886 |
22.7 |
|
> 7 |
390409 |
7.2 |
|
Total |
5394268 |
100.0 |
|
Age |
||
|
< 20 years |
18114 |
0.3 |
|
20 -39 |
1740276 |
32.3 |
|
40 - 59 |
2814542 |
52.2 |
|
> 59 |
821336 |
15.2 |
|
Total |
5394268 |
100.0 |
|
Education |
||
|
no education |
1149056 |
21.3 |
|
not completed primary school |
1833111 |
34.0 |
|
primary school |
1874353 |
34.7 |
|
junior high |
305691 |
5.7 |
|
senior high |
210038 |
3.9 |
|
university |
22019 |
0.4 |
|
Total |
5394268 |
100.0 |
Source: Direktorat Jenderal Peternakan
Table 11. Main income source of Indonesian farmers, 1993
|
Source |
Number |
Percentage |
|
Other agriculture |
4215204 |
78.1 |
|
Mining and quarrying |
54275 |
1.0 |
|
Industry/handicraft |
87786 |
1.6 |
|
Trade |
254098 |
4.7 |
|
Transport |
78987 |
1.5 |
|
Services |
334288 |
6.2 |
|
Income earner |
110697 |
2.1 |
|
Other |
228406 |
4.2 |
|
No other |
30527 |
0.6 |
|
Total |
5394268 |
100.0 |
Source: Direktorat Jenderal PeternakanAs mentioned already, the majority of households engaged in livestock production rely on other agricultural industries for income. Livestock play an important part in crop production since they provide draft power, manure and add value to crop residues. They also make use of seasonal labour surpluses, or underemployed family labour.[6] The contribution to farmer welfare of livestock varies regionally and with farm wealth. Oka, Widowati, Lubis and Holden (1992) say that in certain of the poorer regions of Indonesia, commonly those without natural resources and land suitable for irrigation, livestock play a more important role in the rural economy. They point out that livestock have been found to contribute a greater proportion of household income in poorer families compared to similar wealthier families (p56).
Now that a broad overview of the numbers of farmers involved in livestock production has been provided, the next part of this appendix will examine the industries making up the sector.