Per person consumption of livestock products
Figure 11 shows per person consumption of animal products in Indonesia since 1969. According to Hutabarat (1996), information on consumption of dairy products before 1969 is not available. It seems that this is also the case for meat and for eggs. It is apparent from Figure 12 that consumption has increased dramatically since 1969, presumably because of income increases. In percentage terms, the largest increase occurred for eggs. Data presented later in this part of the report show that meat, eggs and milk are income elastic for all but the highest income families.
Figure 11. Annual consumption per person of meat, eggs and milk
Figure 12. Daily per person consumption of meat, eggs and milk
Price and income elasticities
An Indonesia study conducted by Oka and Rachman (1991) made use of cross sectional data collected in the 1987 national consumer expenditure survey (SUSENAS). According to the authors, this survey provides a high quality series (p53) of data. Demand models were estimated using a double log specification, with prices and income as explanatory variables. Seemingly unrelated least squares was used to obtain the parameter estimates. Estimates were obtained for five different income groups. Income group I had a monthly per person income of less than Rp. 25000; group II had an income range of Rp. 25000 to Rp. 74 999; group III had a range of Rp. 75000 to Rp. 149999; group IV income was from Rp. 150000 to Rp. 300000; and group V was over Rp. 300000. The results obtained by Oka and Rachman are reproduced in Table 49 and in Table 50. A number of the elasticity estimates have the wrong sign. While not commenting on these, Oka and Rachman acknowledge that in their models, parameter estimates will suffer from bias caused by.... excluded variables (p. 56).
Table 49. Own price elasticities by area and by income, national economic survey, 1987
|
Food group
|
Income Group |
Indonesia |
||||||||||
|
I |
II |
III |
IV |
V |
||||||||
|
urban |
rural |
urban |
rural |
urban |
rural |
urban |
rural |
urban |
rural |
urban |
rural |
|
|
Energy food |
||||||||||||
|
Rice & other cereals |
0.34 |
0.11 |
0.34 |
0.06 |
0.29 |
0.13 |
0.18 |
0.33 |
-0.2 |
0.13 |
0.9 |
0.10 |
|
Starchy foods |
-0.28 |
-0.25 |
-0.23 |
-0.20 |
-0.31 |
-0.24 |
-0.47 |
-0.31 |
-0.53 |
-0.31 |
-0.37 |
-0.21 |
|
Oil & fat |
-0.50 |
-0.48 |
-0.36 |
-0.47 |
-0.44 |
-0.50 |
-0.47 |
-0.51 |
-0.26 |
-0.5 |
-0.37 |
-0.45 |
|
Body building foods |
||||||||||||
|
Fish |
0.77 |
0.45 |
0.23 |
0.37 |
0.35 |
0.40 |
0.20 |
0.33 |
0.09 |
0.59 |
0.25 |
0.40 |
|
Meat |
-0.30 |
-1.02 |
-0.43 |
-0.95 |
-0.54 |
-0.80 |
-0.49 |
-0.74 |
-0.50 |
-0.41 |
-0.42 |
-0.62 |
|
Eggs |
-1.0 |
-0.69 |
-0.73 |
-0.75 |
-0.75 |
-0.76 |
-0.76 |
-0.72 |
-0.68 |
-0.83 |
-0.71 |
-0.72 |
|
Milk |
-1.61 |
-0.87 |
-0.46 |
-0.09 |
-0.13 |
-0.08 |
-0.09 |
-0.07 |
-0.17 |
-0.26 |
-0.10 |
-0.07 |
|
Leguminous |
0.26 |
-0.52 |
-0.34 |
-0.34 |
-0.33 |
-0.37 |
-0.32 |
-0.30 |
-0.12 |
-0.26 |
-0.13 |
-0.24 |
|
Body regulating foods |
||||||||||||
|
Vegetables |
-0.01 |
-0.05 |
0.02 |
0.03 |
0.03 |
0.05 |
0.07 |
0.03 |
0.29 |
-0.04 |
0.17 |
0.12 |
|
Fruit |
-0.50 |
-0.43 |
-0.24 |
-0.05 |
-0.21 |
-0.09 |
-0.24 |
-0.08 |
-0.14 |
-0.09 |
-0.18 |
-0.05 |
|
Miscellaneous |
0.33 |
0.33 |
0.35 |
0.29 |
0.35 |
0.27 |
0.28 |
0.18 |
0.25 |
0.15 |
0.32 |
0.27 |
Source: Oka and Rachman (1991), p. 66Table 50 and Table 51 provide estimates of elasticity estimates found from the literature for other commodities.
Table 50. Income elasticities by area and by income group, national economic survey, 1987
|
Food group |
Income Group |
Indonesia |
||||||||||
|
I |
II |
III |
IV |
V |
||||||||
|
urban |
rural |
urban |
rural |
urban |
rural |
urban |
rural |
urban |
rural |
urban |
rural |
|
|
Energy food |
||||||||||||
|
Rice & other cereals |
-0.08 |
0.24 |
-0.06 |
0.20 |
-0.05 |
0.15 |
-0.03 |
-0.15 |
0.06 |
0.01 |
0.03 |
0.16 |
|
Starchy foods |
-0.01 |
0.15 |
-0.17 |
0.09 |
0.15 |
0.27 |
0.24 |
0.24 |
0.14 |
0.25 |
-0.09 |
-0.22 |
|
Oil & fat |
1.40 |
1.10 |
0.67 |
0.94 |
0.67 |
0.80 |
0.57 |
0.51 |
0.26 |
0.05 |
0.38 |
0.53 |
|
Body building foods |
||||||||||||
|
Fish |
-1.66 |
-1.54 |
0.95 |
0.94 |
0.36 |
0.69 |
0.19 |
0.18 |
0.22 |
-0.21 |
0.53 |
0.62 |
|
Meat |
1.69 |
1.75 |
1.58 |
1.87 |
1.33 |
1.37 |
1.24 |
1.32 |
1.02 |
0.48 |
0.95 |
0.81 |
|
Eggs |
2.36 |
2.94 |
1.38 |
1.41 |
1.18 |
1.38 |
1.04 |
1.10 |
0.45 |
0.79 |
0.50 |
0.76 |
|
Milk |
0.16 |
0.01 |
0.27 |
0.04 |
0.23 |
0.15 |
0.26 |
0.16 |
0.08 |
0.47 |
0.05 |
0.01 |
|
Leguminous |
0.87 |
1.33 |
1.10 |
0.88 |
0.94 |
0.76 |
0.87 |
0.85 |
0.40 |
0.42 |
0.38 |
0.48 |
|
Body regulating foods |
||||||||||||
|
Vegetables |
0.73 |
0.70 |
0.56 |
0.71 |
0.62 |
0.75 |
0.57 |
0.62 |
0.32 |
0.33 |
0.35 |
0.50 |
|
Fruit |
0.55 |
0.49 |
0.59 |
0.56 |
0.76 |
0.74 |
0.87 |
0.74 |
0.56 |
0.37 |
0.54 |
0.52 |
|
Miscellaneous |
-0.02 |
0.01 |
0.09 |
0.05 |
0.16 |
0.17 |
0.36 |
0.32 |
0.43 |
0.27 |
0.14 |
0.07 |
Source: Oka and Rachman (1991), p. 67
Table 51. Elasticities for Indonesia, various authors
|
Item |
Value |
|
|
Corn |
|
|
|
|
|
-0.261 |
|
|
|
0.056 |
|
|
|
0.027 |
|
Cassava |
|
|
|
|
|
-0.390 |
|
|
|
0.040 |
|
|
|
-0.029 |
|
Soybean |
|
|
|
|
|
-0.779 |
|
|
|
0.025 |
|
|
|
-0.037 |
|
Beef |
|
|
|
|
|
-0.515 |
|
|
|
0.155 |
|
Poultry |
|
|
|
|
|
-0.647 |
|
|
|
0.101 |
|
Expenditure elasticities |
|
|
|
|
|
0.80 |
|
|
|
0.90 |
|
Item |
Elasticity |
|
Red meat |
2.08 |
|
Meat |
2.71 |
|
Eggs and poultry |
2.16 |
|
Dairy |
1.40 |
|
Red meat |
1.3 |
|
Poultry |
1.2 |
|
Pork |
1.0 |
|
Fresh milk |
1.2 |
|
Milk powder |
1.0 |
|
Total livestock products - urban |
1.2 |
|
Total livestock products - rural |
1.6 |
|
Total livestock products |
2.16 |
|
Pork |
1.0 |
|
Duck eggs |
1.0 |
|
Beef |
1.2 |
|
Mutton. |
1.2 |
|
Poultry meat |
1.5 |
|
Poultry eggs |
1.5 |
Source: Winrock International Institute for Agricultural Development (1986)