|
|
|
WOMEN AND LAND TENURE
|

Clearing land in a
woodlot in Tanzania
|
One of the most serious obstacles to increasing the
agricultural productivity and income of rural women is their
lack of security of tenure. Land tenure refers to a set of
rights which a person or organization holds in land.
Security of tenure is not limited to private ownership but
can exist in a variety of forms such as leases on public
land or user rights to communal property. If tenure is
secure, the holder can reasonably expect to use the land to
its best advantage in accordance with the right, reap a
timely and fair return and be able to enforce the right
against non-holders. Tenure enables the holder to make
management decisions on how land-based resources will be
used for immediate household needs and long-term sustainable
investment.
In order for women farmers, who are responsible for 60 to
80 percent of the food production in developing countries,
to use land more efficiently and thereby make a greater
contribution to food security, they need access to land,
management control of land-based resources and economic
incentives that security of tenure provides.
Why women farmers don't have
security of tenure
Historically women's access to land was based on status
within the family and involved right of use, not ownership.
In Asia, the most prevalent barrier to acquiring real
property is inheritance laws that favour male inheritance
over female. If a woman inherits property, it is managed by
her husband. Hindu women formally hold property rights for
life only; at death it reverts back to the male line. In
Africa, custom rather than religious practice excludes women
from ownership; property is held in a man's name and passed
partrilineally within the group. A widow's right to remain
on the land is not secure. In Latin America, discrimination
results more from limited status under the law. Women, for
example, may reach majority age at 21, but still be required
to be represented by their husbands in all legal capacities.
|

Planting Eucalyptus
trees in Peru
|
Land reform, legislative reform and the forces of
modernization have had a mixed effect. Agrarian reform or
resettlement programmes use the "head of family" concept,
usually a male, as the basis of land reallocation. Few have
significant numbers of female beneficiaries or even pay
attention to gender as a beneficiary category. New
legislation on equality for women is more applicable to the
urban-employed class than rural persons; agricultural land
is even excluded in some new inheritance schemes. Statutory
reform of customary law is confusing and open to
interpretation; when customary, religious or statutory
systems coexist, the law least favourable to women is often
selected. Traditional or customary systems that might have
protected a woman's access to land during her lifetime are
breaking down under population, economic and environmental
pressures. Growing male rural-to-urban migration is leaving
women as de facto heads of households without management
authority over land resources. Even under resettlement
schemes in irrigated areas, women de facto heads of
households rarely benefit.
In some cases, however, women have gained better access
to land through land reform, generally where the
participation of rural women is a well-defined state policy.
In some countries, agrarian reforms replaced the feudal
system where women traditionally held a subordinate role in
family production. Women's organizations in Thailand, China,
Nicaragua, Malaysia and Cuba have helped to overcome
existing barriers or to protect women's rights regarding
inheritance of land. There are also many instances where
women's organizations have fought to gain access to land
which they farm collectively.
top
Effect on food security
The Eritrean approach
Land tenure legislation promulgated in 1994
reflects a strong policy of gender equality. The
right of ownership of all land in Eritrea is the
exclusive right of the government. Every Eritrean
citizen, whose main source of income is the land,
has a lifetime right of usufruct over land with the
provision that such a right is neither divisible
nor inheritable. Eritreans qualify automatically
for land upon attainment of age 18 regardless of
sex, religion or marital status; individual
holdings are registered and lifetime usufructory
title-deeds issued.
Source: Proclamation to
Reform the System of Land Tenure in Eritrea, No.
58/1994
|
Fifty percent of the world's resource-poor farmers
are women, who also have primary responsibility for food
security. Their success in meeting daily household needs
depends on how well they manage and supplement a limited and
delicately balanced set of resources: cropland, pasture and
forest. Without land and secure tenure a woman cannot access
credit and membership in agricultural associations,
particularly those responsible for processing and marketing.
If tenure is secure, a woman can invest in, rather than
exploit, the land's productive potential and she is more
likely to adopt environmentally sustainable farming
practices. She can plan and quickly adjust resource
allocation decisions under changing climate or economic
conditions and rely on the productive results of her labour.
Control of the product is also an important consideration
in examining women's land rights. Security of tenure is
often the key to having control over major decisions such as
what crop to grow and what techniques to use as well as what
to consume and what to sell. Given women's tendency to grow
food as opposed to cash crops and to spend income on family
food, security of tenure for women must be viewed as a key
link in the chain from household food production to national
food security.
top
A way
out?
1. Comprehensive tenure reform for women
that considers marriage, inheritance and contract
rights should be made a priority food security
issue.
2. Legislative and policy initiatives
should reflect women's actual experience and needs;
the reform process should be participatory.
3. Reform should be matched with legal
literacy training for men and women, particularly
on the relationship between law and rural
productivity.
4. Greater attention should be given to
alternative forms of ownership and management, such
as cooperatives and self-help groups, including
women.
The Beijing Platform for Action and the FAO Plan
of Action for Women in Development make removal of
barriers to women's access to land a high priority.
|
Limitations on the married woman's capacity with
respect to property in the Civil Codes of various Latin
American countries
|
Country
|
How marital authority is represented in Civil
Codes
|
|
Chile
|
The husband is the administrator and
representative of the conjugal property under the
community property regime.
|
|
Ecuador
|
Unless agreed otherwise in the marriage
contract, the husband administers the conjugal
property.
|
|
El Salvador
|
The husband administers his wife's assets if she
is a minor.
|
|
Guatemala
|
The husband administers the property under both
the community property and the property of conjugal
partnership regimes.
|
|
Mexico
(States of Aguas Calientes, Oaxaca and
Sonora)
|
The husband administers the conjugal property
under the community property regime
|
|
Nicaragua
|
The husband is the family's representative or,
in his absence, the wife (Civil Code, Art. 151). In
practice, however, this does not appear to have any
economic consequences.
|
|
Paraguay
|
Unless otherwise stated in the marriage
contract, the husband is the administrator of the
property.
|
|
Dominican Republic
|
The husband administers the property, even under
the separate property regime.
|
The data in this table were taken
from the case-studies and papers presented at the Round
Table on "Legal Mechanisms to facilitate Women's
Participation in Rural Development".
|