Annex 1. Record of fishing operation
Annex 2. Anchovy - Length distributions and maturity stages
Annex 3. Small pelagic fish. Length distributions and maturity stages
Annex 4. Demersal fish. Length distribution and maturity stages
Annex 5. Shallow water shrimp. Design of the survey and worksheet for the computations
ANCHOVY - Stolephorus spp. - Total Length frequency distributions and maturity stages
Table 1. AHCHOVY - Total length frequency distributions by stations
Table 2. ANCHOVY - Maturity Stages
|
Stages |
State |
Description |
|
|
Juvenile |
Immature |
Testes: |
Small transparent, colourless to grey |
|
Ovaries: |
Glassy transparent, compact wall and small volume. Eggs not visible with
the naked, eye, but under the microscope they are glassy transparent,
polygonal, curved, to one another. |
||
|
2 |
Mature virgin |
Testes: |
Small, transparent reddish grey colour. |
|
Ovaries: |
Translucent, of reddish to reddish grey colour, walls compact, volume
solid and readily recognized. Under microscope the eggs are polygonal. |
||
|
3 |
Developing stage |
Testes: |
Longer opaque, non-transparent, white in colour, wall compact, if pressed
white milt runs out slowly. |
|
Ovaries: |
Opaque orange to reddish white, wall richly vascularized. Contents very
compact, but loose spherical translucent eggs present. |
||
|
4 |
Mature |
Testes: |
Translucent creamy white. Milts runs out with slight pressure. Walls
loose and soft. |
|
Ovaries: |
Translucent, reddish, some orange in colour. Ovaries filled with loose,
eggs which run out with slight pressure. All eggs are glassy transparent. |
||
|
5 |
Spent |
Testes: |
Much shorter in length, dark grey to reddish grey with loose walls, and
rich in blood vessels. Ho milts runs out when pressed. |
|
Ovaries: |
Transparent, dark red, walls very loose with numerous folds, very much
shorter and bloody. Lots of solid materials, but only with few eggs, sometimes
already quite similar to stage 2. |
||
Size distribution of fish examined and Maturity stages of D. russellii and R. kanagurta
Size distribution of snail pelagic fish examined
Size distribution of snail pelagic fish examined (cont. 1)
Size distribution of snail pelagic fish examined (cont. 2)
Size distribution of snail pelagic fish examined (cont. 3)
TABLE 2. Maturity stages of D. russellii and. R. kanagurta
Table 1. - DEMERSAL FISH - Length frequency distributions of Saurida undosquamis and Polynemus sextarius
DEMERSAL FISHES
|
Saurida undosquamis |
Sub. Total |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
N |
|
S2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
1 |
4 |
5 |
17 |
18 |
26 |
12 |
14 |
2 |
5 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
110 |
22.3 |
5.62 |
|
|
Polynemus sextarius |
Angoche + Moebase |
3 |
23 |
10 |
31 |
32 |
28 |
8 |
2 |
2 |
12 |
11 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
167 |
10.9 |
10.19 |
|
Quelimane I + Beira |
|
|
9 |
11 |
12 |
16 |
4 |
1 |
3 |
4 |
7 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70 |
11.8 |
7.41 |
|
|
Quelimane II |
1 |
15 |
22 |
56 |
22 |
34 |
3 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
154 |
9.8 |
1.81 |
|
Stages |
State |
Description |
|
Juvenile |
Immature |
The gonads are slender, transparent. The colour is yellow to
rose. Generally, it is difficult to determine the sex of the specimen at naked
eye. |
|
2 |
Mature virgin |
Ovaries transparent. Blood vessels can be seen in the ovary
wall. Ova small and not visible to naked eye. |
|
3 |
Ripening |
Development of ovaries. Ovocytes translucent, the colour of
ovaries range from yellow to orange. |
|
4 |
Ripe |
Ovaries round. Occupying 1/3 of ventral cavity. The colour
varies from species to species. In majority of cases are orange-red. |
|
5 |
Spent |
Ovocytes transparent which are released by pressure of the
abdomen. The rupture is synchronous. |
|
6 |
Recovering spent |
Ovaries bloodshot, flabby and light. The cavity of ovary is
big and contain remnants of disintegrating opaque and ripe ova, darkened or
translucent which are adherent to the ovary walls. External sexual opening is
big. |
Table 1. - Design of the survey
Strata definition
Based on strata definition of the last survey and on their recommendations (Brinca et all 1982) the 6 sub-areas had been subdivided in eighteen new strata.
|
Sub-area |
Stratum |
Geographic Limits |
Depth boundaries |
|
1 |
1 |
16°20 - 16°475 |
5 - 20 m |
|
2 |
2 |
16°475 - 17°15 |
5 - 20 m |
|
3 |
3.1.a |
17°15' - 17°40 |
5 - 25 m |
|
3.2.a |
|
|
|
|
3.1.b |
|
|
|
|
3.2.b |
17°40 - 17°525 |
25 - 45 m |
|
|
4 |
4.1.a |
|
|
|
4.2.a |
17°525 - 18°30 |
5 - 25 m |
|
|
4.1.b |
|
|
|
|
4.2.b |
18°30 - 18°50 |
25 - 45 m |
|
|
5 |
5.1.a |
|
5 - 20 m |
|
5.1.c |
18°50 - 19°15 |
20 - 25 m |
|
|
5.2.a |
|
25 - 45 m |
|
|
5.1.b |
|
5 - 20 m |
|
|
5.1.d |
19°15 - 19°40 |
20 - 25 m |
|
|
5.2.b |
|
25 - 45 m |
|
|
6 |
6.a |
19°40 - 19°50 |
West of 35°40 |
|
6.b |
19°50 - 21°00 |
|
Table 2. - Worksheet for the computation of the mean catch per tow for the total catch of shrimp

Table 3. - Worksheet for the computation of total shrimp biomass (in weight)
Swept area by tow = 1.4 × 1.852 × 0.018 Km2
|
|
STRATUM ESTIMATES |
|||||||||||||||
|
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
Total |
|||||||||||
|
|
3.1.a |
3.1.b |
3.2.a |
3.2.b |
4.1.a |
4.1.b |
4.2.a |
4.2.b |
5.1.a |
5.1.b |
5.1.c |
5.1.d. |
6.a |
6.b |
|
|
|
|
1.341 |
4.565 |
2.785 |
0.025 |
0.4125 |
7.213 |
34.308 |
0.995 |
0 |
9.283 |
5.16 |
0.835 |
5.62 |
18.083 |
0 |
5.34 |
|
Ah (Km2) |
1454 |
1753 |
1049 |
1063 |
458 |
1612 |
1070 |
2576 |
1091 |
1180 |
1173 |
789 |
1060 |
518 |
1324 |
18170 |
|
|
41.8 |
171.4 |
62.6 |
0.57 |
4.0 |
249.0 |
786.1 |
54.9 |
0 |
234.5 |
129.6 |
14.1 |
127.6 |
200.6 |
0 |
2077 |
b) Results
|
|
Stratum Estimates |
|||||||||||||||
|
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
Total |
|||||||||||
|
|
3.1.a |
3.1.b |
3.2.a |
3.2.b |
4.1.a |
4.1.b |
4.2.a |
4.2.b |
5.1.a |
5.1.b |
5.1.c |
5.1.d |
6.a |
6.b |
|
|
|
|
0.003 |
0.211 |
0.475 |
0 |
0 |
1.468 |
3.906 |
0.657 |
0 |
5.240 |
0 |
0.720 |
0.325 |
17.750 |
0 |
1.398 |
|
Ah (Km2) |
1454 |
1753 |
1049 |
1063 |
458 |
1612 |
1070 |
2576 |
1091 |
1180 |
1173 |
789 |
1060 |
518 |
1324 |
18170 |
|
|
0.09 |
7.9 |
10.7 |
0 |
0 |
50.7 |
89.5 |
36.2 |
0 |
132.4 |
0 |
12.2 |
7.4 |
196.9 |
0 |
544 |
+

b) Results
|
|
Stratum estimates |
|||||||||||||||
|
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
Total |
|||||||||||
|
|
3.1.a |
3.1.1 |
3.2.a |
3.2.b |
4.1.a |
4.1.b |
4.2.a |
4.2.b |
5.1.a |
5.1.b |
5.1.c |
5.1.d |
6.a |
6.b |
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
10.1 |
15.5 |
0 |
0 |
55.6 |
149.0 |
0 |
0 |
137.3 |
0 |
21.0 |
8.5 |
392 |
0 |
37.1 |
|
Ah (Km2) |
1454 |
1753 |
1049 |
1063 |
458 |
1612 |
1070 |
2576 |
1091 |
1180 |
1175 |
789 |
1060 |
518 |
1324 |
18170 |
|
S × 103 (n°) |
15.6 |
380.6 |
348.2 |
0 |
0 |
1919.2 |
3413.9 |
0 |
0 |
3469.3 |
0 |
354.8 |
192.9 |
4348.1 |
0 |
14 442.6 |
stock sizeb) Results
|
|
Stratum estimates |
|||||||||||||||
|
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
Total |
|||||||||||
|
|
3.1.a |
3.1.b |
3.2.a |
3.2.b |
4.1.a |
4.1.b |
4.2.a |
4.2.b |
5.1.a |
5.1.b |
5.1.c |
5.1.d. |
6.a |
6.b |
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
6.7 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
9.8 |
24.0 |
0 |
0 |
43.7 |
0 |
7 |
3.5 |
236 |
0 |
13.3 |
|
Ah (Km2) |
1454 |
1753 |
1049 |
1063 |
458 |
1612 |
1070 |
2576 |
1091 |
1180 |
1173 |
789 |
1060 |
518 |
1324 |
18170 |
|
S × 103 (n°) |
15.6 |
251.5 |
112.3 |
0 |
0 |
338.3 |
549.9 |
0 |
0 |
1104.2 |
0 |
118.2 |
79.4 |
2617.7 |
0 |
5187.2 |
- Estimates of stock size (in number)
splitted by length group and by stratuma) Length frequency distribution by stratum
b) Data weighted by total n° of each stratum
Total number in the bottom line and in the last column do not coincide with the sums of the values for the original values were divided by 103 in order to allow a better reading of the table.
Table 8. - P. indicus
- Estimates of stock size (in number)
splitted by maturity stages and by stratum
a) Percentages of maturity stages by stratum (calculated by weighting each sample by the total number of each station and combining the results by stratum)
|
Strata |
5.1.a |
5.1.b |
4.1.a |
4.1.b |
5.1.a |
5.1.c |
5.1.d |
6.a |
|
Maturity Stages |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
26.1 |
60.0 |
54.2 |
78.9 |
63.3 |
7.1 |
14.3 |
22.9 |
|
2 |
10.9 |
20.0 |
18.8 |
9.9 |
8.4 |
- |
|
15.0 |
|
5 |
26.1 |
|
6.2 |
- |
8.4 |
28.6 |
14.3 |
42.2 |
|
4 |
21.6 |
|
2.1 |
4.2 |
4.6 |
21.4 |
|
16.5 |
|
5 |
10.9 |
|
6.2 |
- |
4.6 |
28.6 |
28.5 |
1.7 |
|
1d |
4.4 |
20.0 |
12.5 |
7.0 |
10.7 |
14.3 |
42.9 |
1.7 |
|
Total number sampled |
46 |
10 |
48 |
71 |
131 |
14 |
7 |
472 |
|
Strata |
5.1.a |
5.1.b |
4.1.a |
4.1.b |
5.1.a |
5.1.c |
5.1.d |
6.a |
Total number |
|
Maturity Stages |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
65.6 |
67.4 |
183.3 |
433.9 |
699.0 |
8.4 |
11.4 |
599.5 |
2062.4 |
|
2 |
27.4 |
22.5 |
63.6 |
54.4 |
92.8 |
|
|
392.7 |
653.3 |
|
5 |
65.6 |
|
21.0 |
|
92.8 |
33.8 |
11.4 |
1104.7 |
1329.2 |
|
4 |
54.3 |
|
7.1 |
23.1 |
50.8 |
25.3 |
|
431.9 |
592.6 |
|
5 |
27.4 |
|
21.0 |
|
50.8 |
33.8 |
22.6 |
44.5 |
200.1 |
|
1 d |
11.1 |
22.5 |
42.3 |
38.5 |
118.1 |
16.9 |
34.1 |
44.5 |
327.9 |
|
S × 103 |
251.5 |
112.3 |
338.3 |
549.9 |
1104.2 |
118.3 |
79.4 |
2617.7 |
5171.6 |
Table 9. - P. indicus
- Estimates of stock size (in number) splitted by length groups and by stratum
a) Length frequency distribution by stratum
b) Data weighted by total number of each stratum
Total number in the bottom line and in the last column do not coincide with sums of the values for the original values were divided by 103 in order to allow a better reading of the table.
Table 10. - Worksheet for the computation of M. monoceros biomass (in weight)
b) Results
|
|
Stratum Estimates |
|||||||||||||||
|
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
Total |
|||||||||||
|
|
3.1.a |
3.1.b |
3.2.a |
3.2.b |
4.1.a |
4.1.b |
4.2.a |
4.2.b |
5.1.a |
5.1.b |
5.1.c |
5.1.d |
6.a |
6.b |
|
|
|
|
0.77 |
0.987 |
0.235 |
0.010 |
0.325 |
1.407 |
3.883 |
0.32 |
0 |
2.680 |
0 |
0.065 |
0.045 |
0.240 |
0 |
0.764 |
|
Ah (Km2) |
1454 |
1753 |
1049 |
1063 |
458 |
1612 |
1070 |
2576 |
1091 |
1180 |
1173 |
789 |
1060 |
518 |
1324 |
18170 |
|
|
24.0 |
37.1 |
5.3 |
0.2 |
3.2 |
48.6 |
89.0 |
17.7 |
0 |
67.7 |
0 |
1.1 |
1.0 |
2.7 |
0 |
297.4 |
+

b) Results
|
|
Stratum estimates |
|||||||||||||||
|
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
Total |
|||||||||||
|
|
3.1.a |
3.1.b |
3.2.a |
3.2.b |
4.1.a |
4.1.b |
4.2.a |
4.2.b |
5.1.a |
5.1.b |
5.1.c |
5.1.d |
6.a |
6.b |
|
|
|
|
99.5 |
84.7 |
14 |
0 |
16 |
120.8 |
422 |
0 |
0 |
116.3 |
0 |
3.5 |
3 |
12.5 |
0 |
61.2 |
|
Ah (Km2) |
1454 |
1753 |
1049 |
1063 |
458 |
1612 |
1070 |
2576 |
1090 |
1180 |
1173 |
789 |
1060 |
518 |
1324 |
18170 |
|
S × 103 (n°) |
3097.9 |
3179.4 |
314.5 |
0 |
156.9 |
4169.8 |
9669.0 |
0 |
0 |
2939.4 |
0 |
59.1 |
68.1 |
138.7 |
0 |
23792.7 |
stock sizeb) Results
|
|
Stratum estimates |
|||||||||||||||
|
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
Total |
|||||||||||
|
|
3.1.a |
3.1.b |
3.2.a |
3.2.b |
4.1.a |
4.1.b |
4.2.a |
4.2.b |
5.1.a |
5.1.b |
5.1.c |
5.1.d |
6.a |
6.b |
|
|
|
|
48.8 |
46.9 |
10.0 |
0 |
9.5 |
76.0 |
224.5 |
0 |
0 |
53.3 |
0 |
1.0 |
0.5 |
4.5 |
0 |
32.56 |
|
Ah(Km2) |
1454 |
1753 |
1049 |
1063 |
458 |
1612 |
1070 |
2576 |
1091 |
1180 |
1173 |
789 |
1060 |
518 |
1324 |
18170 |
|
S × 103 |
1519.3 |
1760.5 |
224.6 |
0 |
93.2 |
2623.4 |
5139.2 |
0 |
0 |
1346.8 |
0 |
16.9 |
11.3 |
49.9 |
0 |
12785.2 |
- Estimates of stock size (in number)
splitted by length groups and by stratuma) Length frequency distribution by stratum
b) Data weighted by total number of each stratum
Total number in the bottom line and in the last column do not coincide with the sums of the values for the original values were divided by 103 in order to allow a better reading of the table.
Table 14. M. monoceros
- Estimates of stock size (in number)
splitted by maturity stages and by stratum
b) Data weighted by total number of each stratum
Total number in the bottom line and in the last column do not coincide with the sums of the values for the original values were divided by 103 in order to allow a better reading of the table.
Table 15. - M. monoceros
- Estimates of stock size (in number)
splitted by length groups and by stratum
a) Length frequency distribution by stratum
b) Data weighted, by total number of each stratum
Total number in the bottom line and in the last column do not coincide with the sums of the values for the original values were divided by 103 in order to allow a better reading of the table.
From GEOLOGICAL-GEOPHYSICAL ATLAS OF THE INDIAN OCEAN, Moscow 1975.
A.S. JOHN GRIEG