UKRAINE
by A.V. BOGOVIN |
1. INTRODUCTION With a population of 49,700,000 (according to the World Factbook the 2006 population was estimated at 46,710,816 with a growth rate of - 0.6%), Ukraine covers an area of 604 000 square km. It is in the south-east of the Eastern European plain between longitudes 22208' and 40213' east and latitudes 44222' and 52218' north. Its greatest distance from west to east is 1,316 km, from north to south - 893 km. It borders Belarus to the north, Russia in the east and south-east; Moldova and Romania in the south-west; with Hungary, Slovakia and Poland in the west. In the south it has outlets to the Azov and the Black Sea. The length of seaboard is about 1,580 km.
From a total land area of 604, 000 km2 of land, the utilized agricultural area is 418,000 km2 (i.e. 69 percent of the total). Arable land occupies 326,700 km2 (54 percent of the total), natural haymaking and pastures - 78,400 km2 (13 percent), orchards, berry-fields, vineyards and other long-term plantations - 22,500 km2 (4 percent). Forests cover 94,000 km2 (15.6 percent of the total land area). The greatest areas of forest are in the northern flat part of Ukraine and in mountain regions of the Carpathians and the Crimea (forest covers 27 percent of these regions). The forests yield about 9,000,000 m3 of wood or 22-25 percent of national requirements. The forests play a considerable role in soil and water conservation, as well as areas for recreation. In the former Soviet Union the agricultural enterprises were mainly collective and state farms. In 1980 there were 9,067, of which collective farms - 6,963 and state farms - 2,104. The process of conversion of collective and state farms took place in the following years. The size of farms varied depending on specialization and territorial location; the average size of collective farms was 5,158 hectares, state farms - 5671 hectares (in Polissia : 2-4, Forest-steppe : 3-6, in Steppe : 6-10 thousand hectares) (Urogaj, 1979). Collective and the state farms undertook more than 90 percent of crop production and 70 percent of cattle-raising (66-69 percent of meat, 73 percent of milk, 96-97 percent of wool). The remaining production was from individual farms. Occupying 2.7 percent of land area of the former Soviet Union and 16 percent of its cultivated area, Ukraine produced in 1970 (as a percentage of total production) 20 percent of the grain, 59 percent of the sugar beet, 62 percent of the beet sugar, 44 percent of the sunflower seeds, 21 percent of the potatoes, 22 percent of the milk and 22 percent of meat of every kind. As to grain production, according to FAO estimates, Ukraine was in first position in Europe and in fourth position (behind USA, China and Canada) in the world. Ukraine in 1990 produced 51,000,000 tons of grain, or 1 ton per capita. Over 40 percent of the sown area and gross harvest of grain were winter wheat. The same level was anticipated in the future (Ministry of Agrarian Policy, 2000). However, intensification of agriculture with a high ratio of ploughed land (54 percent of the entire territory or 82 percent of all cultivated area) caused serious erosion and deterioration of the potable water quality. Annual losses of soil reached some 600,000,000 tons, including 20 - 30 000 000 tons of humus. Calculations show that ecological and economical losses caused by the erosion exceed US$ 1.6 billions a year. Coarse grain and pulse crops contributed 16.2 percent to the structure of grain planting in 1991 - 1995. Their percentage was reduced to 15.9 percent in 1996 - 1997. 11 percent are planned for 2002 - 2004. The area of forage crops grew constantly from 6,000,000 hectares in 1913 to 10-11 000 000 hectares (32 percent of the total sown area) in 1965 - 1970; the area reached remained stable until quite recently. Most of this area was maize intended for silage and green feed, annual and perennial grasses, root crops and fodder melon-watermelons. Perennial grasses have been gaining favour in recent years. Ukraine became independent in 1991. Land reforms undertaken in 1992 provided free distribution of land to private citizens to carry on private infield farming. A new branch of economy for Ukraine- farming - had emerged. The number of farms has now reached 40,000, their average area being 22.6 hectares. Now we have the process of farm strengthening through co-operation, formation of agrarian partnerships, as well as through lease of land plots (shares) in private ownership of people by members of some collective and budgetary enterprises. Nevertheless, the public production sector has been the largest up to 1999 and remains the largest now. It manages 87 percent of cultivated land. The structure of agricultural production of Ukraine is shown in table 1. Table 1. The structure of agricultural production of Ukraine
Source: Department of strategy and development of agrarian economy of the Ministry of Agrarian Policy of Ukraine database, 1999 Disruption of inter-industrial links caused by the disintegration of the Soviet Union, sky-rocketing energy prices and technical facilities with high inflation rates and unbalanced economic mechanisms, including inadequate pricing, unfavourable credit and tax policies, high disparity of prices of food and industrial products (1:5), large debts in payments for work and low solvency of enterprises, slight upgrading of fixed assets and high depreciation of technical facilities - all this caused serious economical crises and recession in practically all branches of agriculture under a market economy. Compared to 1990, application of mineral fertilizers in 1999, per hectare of sown area, was reduced by a factor of 7.8, and organic ones by a factor of 5. During the same period, the area of lime application on acid soils was reduced by a factor of 62 and gypsum treatment of saline soils was reduced by a factor of 179. Land cultivation techniques in recent years have violated good practice under conditions of extremely unfavourable balance of humus, phosphorus and potassium, resulting in an overall decline in the yield of crops and gross harvest of crop products (tables 2 and 3). Table 2. Productivity of basic crop agricultural enterprises, kg/ha
Source: Department of strategy and development of agrarian economy of the Ministry of Agrarian Policy of Ukraine database, 1999 Table 3. Crop production in all categories of enterprise (000 tonnes)
Source: Department of strategy and development of agrarian economy of the Ministry of Agrarian Policy of Ukraine database, 1999 From 1990 to 1999, cattle were reduced by a factor of 2.1, cows by a factor of 1.4; milk yield per cow fell by 1.7, and weight increments were reduced by 1.8. Beef production, as slaughter weight, was reduced from 84 to 44.5 kg per capita in 1995 already, while in 1999 the figure has dropped to 34 kg; milk per capita was reduced from 472.3 to 335.2 and 267.7 kg respectively. Sheep rearing is in a tight situation now as well. All this led to a steep reduction of gross agricultural production. From 1990 to 1999, this criterion was reduced by 48.5 percent for all categories of enterprises; reduction in plant growing was 52.9 percent, in cattle breeding 44.2 percent (figure 2).
Figure 2. Dynamics of gross agricultural production. Decrease in farm production under crisis conditions was considerably smaller compared to public enterprises (figure 3): gross production was reduced by 0.9 percent, cattle-breeding by 11 percent, while crop production even increased by 12.8 percent which shows their better profitability.
Collective and public agricultural enterprises only retained quite good production indices during this period where their managers put general economic interests above personal ones. Export totals were reduced for many kinds of agricultural commodities, except for wheat, oats and rye grain (Shpitchak, 2000). |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2. SOILS AND TOPOGRAPHY Major topographical features Plains occupy over 90 percent of Ukraine. However it has the Crimean Mountains in the south and the Carpathians in the west. The highest elevations of its plains are 300 - 473 m above the sea, while those in the highlands reach heights of 1,542 m (Mt. Roman-Kosh in the Crimean Mountains) and 2,061 m (Mt. Goverla in the Carpathians). The high part of the flatland is in the central and southern areas of the country; it spreads from the west to south-west and occupies Podolskaia, Prydneprovskaia, Pryazovskaia and the Donetskaia high grounds. The lowest elevations can be found in the south, in Prychernomorie lowlands (38-67 m), in the centre - Prydneprovskaia lowland (65 m) and on the northern territories of Ukraine referred to as the Poltava plain and Polissia lowland. Soil cover of the latter region is the least well drained and may be characterised by a high percentage of swampy land. 32, 000 km2 (66 percent) of swamps have been drained and brought into agricultural production. It is planned to increase the drained swamp area up to 38, 000 km2 in the future (Kovalenko, 1998]. Large stocks of peat are available. The river network comprises over 22,000 rivers with a total length of up to 170,000 km. The Dnieper, the largest - its basin covers 40 percent of the Ukraine, crosses the country from north to south and flows to the Black Sea, being the largest navigable artery of the country. There are many lakes, reservoirs and ponds. Major soil types The soil cover of Ukraine is diversified and tends to occur in latitudinal zones across the country (figure 4). Figure 4. Soil Map of Ukraine
Kinds of soils:
The north-west has a wide belt of soddy (dern or dernovo)- podzolic soils with mainly light texture on sand-clay strata. These soils form some 70 percent of the total cover, are characterised by low humus content, increased acidity and therefore need application of mineral fertilizers and organic manures, as well as lime to yield a rich harvest. Thirty percent of the territory is occupied with sod (dern), meadow, meadow-bog and peat-bog soils with slight soddy (dernor dernovo) sands on elevated pine-clad terraces. Over 600,000 hectares(60 percent) of Ukrainian peat lands are concentrated here. A wide belt of grey forest soils, as well as podzol and typical chernozems with a 1.2-1.5 m thick humus bed, running from south-west to northeast, is located somewhat to the south. These soils are formed on loess strata. In addition to these, small areas are occupied with bog, meadow and meadow-chernozem soils, often of solonetz type. Further to the south, encompassing a considerable part of the territory of Odessa, Kirovograd, Dnipropetrovsk, Zaporizhia, Donetsk and Lugansk regions, typical chernozems stretch, with the thickness of their humus bed up to 80-90 cm, formed on moist-loamy strata. The southern part of Prychernomorie lowlands contains dry southern chernozems, which are replaced along the coastlines of the Black Sea and the Sea of Azov with a rather narrow strip of dark-chestnut and then chestnut soils combined with solonetz and soloth. Carbonatic chernozems and brown forest (often with gravel) soils prevail in the Crimean Mountains, while the Carpathians are characterised with short-profile mountain-forest and sod-brown soils with low content of humus, leached and heavy acid soils (pH=3.6 - 5). [Note: The classification applied in this paper is the Russian Soil Classification (Ivanova and Rozov, 1967) or a variant thereof. The terms dern(ovo) and sod are typically Russian and not easily translatable. Dernovo is used as "pseudo" in podzol-like soils. "Sod" refers to the topsoil horizon. Many of these soils correspond with the Albeluvisols (or FAO Podzoluvisols) which are characterized by a dark surface horizon, a bleached eluvial horizon and a horizon in which clay has accumulated. They are normally acid and sandy textured. A soil map of the Ukraine is contained in the FAO Land and Water Digital media series # 10 (Soil and Terrain Database, Land Degradation Status and Soil Vulnerability Assessment of Central and Eastern Europe.) For details about this CD see http://www.fao.org/catalog/book_review/giii/x8322-e.htm Another CD ROM with a smaller scale soil map for Ukraine but also including a book on "Russian soils and their classification" is contained in FAO Digital Media Series #7 Soil and Physiographic Database for Northern Eurasia.. For details see < http://www.fao.org/catalog/book_review/giii/x3528-e.htm > and extracts of the book at the iiasa website. http://www.iiasa.ac.at/Research/FOR/papers/medea/3_soils.htm]. |
5. THE PASTURE RESOURCE Natural features of grassland and cultivation of fodder crops. The vast area of Ukraine, including several different natural-climatic zones, causes considerable diversity of grasslands as to their variety and composition of vegetation, and of their productivity. According to our estimates (personally Bogovin A.V.), resource potentialities of natural grassland are as follows (table 9): Table 9. The natural resource potential of grassland of Ukraine
The largest areas of grasslands are in Polissia and the Carpathians (17.8 percent) with lesser areas in the Forest Steppe (10.3 percent) and in the Steppe (12.7 percent). In all zones, they are represented by continental meadows and flood lands. Meadow formations comprising Elytrigia repens, Festuca pratensis, Phleum pratense, Alopecurus pratensis, Poa pratensis; Festuca rubra and Calamagrostis epigeios on sandy soils are prevailing in the vegetation cover of Polissia, northern and western Forest Steppe, while Nardus stricta etc are mostly spread on heavy acid soils and alpine meadows of the Carpathians. Natural fodder grasslands in the southern part of the Forest Steppe are represented by steppified meadows and meadow steppes with prevailing Festuca rupicola and F. valesiaca, Stipa capillata, S. pennata, S. tirsa, Bromopsis inermis, and Poa angustifolia.. Real tipchak steppes are spread in the Steppe; they are represented in the northern part with herbal-tipchak-stipa formations (Stipa lessingiana, S. zalesski, S. pulcherima, S. tirsa, Festuca valesiaca and a few forbs), while southwards, on black earths, they are represented by tipchak-stipa species (Stipa ucrainica, S. capilata, S. lessingiana, Festuca rupicola and Festuca with small forb content. In Prysyvashie, along the Black Sea and the Sea of Azov, on Solonetz Chestnut soils, they are represented with wormwood-poaceous steppes (Artemisia santonica, A. taurica and wormwood-tipchak formations). Grasslands within the Forest Steppe and on flood lands are saline; the same takes place in the Steppe on low ground. These have vegetation characterised by Elytrigia pseudocaesia, Alopecurus arundinaceus, Poa angustifolia, Juncus gerardi, Eleocharis uniglumis, Puccinellia bilykiana, Puccinellia fominii, while the littoral belt contains Aeluropus littoralis and Juncus maritimus. Plant formations in the Steppe, especially in its southern part, are low-yielding and often dry standing, so resulting in shortage of grass fodder on pastures. The deficiency is replenished by growing annual forages or irrigable pastures. During the past 15 years, natural grassland with an area of some 3,000,000 hectares was replaced by sown pasture. The annual scope of work aimed at renovation of degraded plant formations was reduced by a factor of more than 2 (from 443,000 to 210,200 ha) in 1995 compared to 1990, while the reduction in 1998 was already characterised by a factor of 3.5. Natural hayfields and pastures on large areas are preserved on alpine meadows of the Carpathians and in the Crimea, while within the plain parts of the country they are in long-term flood plains of large and medium rivers, on swamplands with poor sand soils or on ground cut by ravines and washes; in the south of the country they are preserved on grasslands with prevailing Solonetz-Solonchak complexes. Pasture in the north of Ukraine (Polissia and northern Forest Steppe) for irrigation is usually made with leguminous-poaceous or poaceous (on the land plots with increased soil moisture) mixtures containing 3-5 species comprising Phleum pratense, Festuca pratensis, Dactylis glomerata, Bromopsis inermis, Trifolium pratensis, T. repens with inclusion of Lolium multiflorum in western regions of Ukraine and its hybrids with Festuca orientalis. Use of legumes in mixtures allows us to obtain high yield over several years without application of nitrogen fertilisers. Dactylis glomerata regrows 10-15 days earlier compared with Festuca pratensis and 25-35 days earlier if compared with Phleum pratense. Therefore, to avoid aging of the plant formation of Dactylis glomerata, it is sown on 25 percent of the area in pasture crop rotation. Mixtures of Medicago sativa and Bromopsis inermis are the most popular in the southern Forest Steppe in waterless valleys, while those in the Steppe include Medicago sativa, Onobrychis arenaria or O. vicifolia, Bromopsis inermis, and B. riparia. Also, it is recommended to introduce Agropyron pectinatum or A. desertorum, Psathyrostagys juncea, Elytrigia pseudocaesia, Roegneria trachycaulon, which withstand dry conditions and soils salinisation. Here perennial mixtures, as a rule, are combined with planting of drought-resistant annual crops and first of all with sorghum (Sorghum sudanense). These crops are utilized through grazing or mowing with feeding in mangers. Problems High energy-intensive systems of fodder production with all-year cattle management on large farms, developed during the years when Ukraine was in the Soviet Union, was found to be untenable in a market economy. Therefore, we have the task today of turning up to 8,000,000 hectares of arable land into grassland to improve the structure and environmental conditions of agro landscapes, increasing the share of grass fodder in fodder resources (use of pasture would be preferred since they are the least demanding in energy resources), and putting cattle out to graze in summer. However, absence of finances, seeds of perennial grass, poor technical capacities of farms, curtailment of annual scope of pasture establishment makes solution of the task a problematic question. It increases the specific weight of old-sown grasslands and wasteland occupied with low-quality spontaneous vegetation. Common village pastures are overstocked with animals; this causes serious degradation of the pastures. Land sharing in a number of regions with allotment of land plots to particular owners complicates grazing of collective herds thus increasing individual work loads. Private holdings of the people and small farms have no technical capacities to procure silage and hay for winter; production of grass meal has practically ceased because of high fuel cost. Therefore, winter fodder roughages are based on straw and hay of poor quality made from grass collected when over mature. Almost everywhere pastures are not (or rarely) given mineral fertilizers; irrigation has ceased due to high electric power cost; regular mowing of weeds is not done. Removal of the surface mass of plant associations as compared with their annual increment frequently exceeds acceptable standards; rates are more than 70-75 percent in the Steppe, 75-80 percent in the Forest Steppe and 85-90 percent in Polissia. This leads to reduction of pasture productivity and deterioration of fodder quality, thus causing reduction in animal productivity. Cessation of liming of acid soils is a great problem in the Polissia zone in recent years. Natural restoration of the original acidity of sod-podzol soils becomes a limiting factor for use of legumes in plant formations and for efficient rehabilitation of grasslands contaminated with radioactive elements because of Chernobyl NPP disaster. Low professional skills of new farmers may often be seen. All this reduces efficiency of grassland maintenance and has an adverse impact on dairy and meat productivity of animals. Rotational management of cattle Cattle grazing in Ukraine is recognised as having good prospects, but was not widespread until quite recently because of cheap energy sources. Large collective dairy enterprises organised highly-productive pastures near the main cattle-farming premises, equipped with mechanical milking devices, or near summer camps with the use of small holding-pen grazing using stationary or movable electric fences. Such cattle management almost halves the costs of livestock products and to obtain 9-12 kg of milk from a cow per day with low consumption of concentrates is conducive to good animal health. Nowadays, however, because of deteriorated management and reduction of pasture productivity, such a management system has become a baffling problem for farms with many livestock. Due to poor equipment, late or absence of regular mowing of uneaten plant residues causes accumulation of old grass and weeds leading to pastures of low nutritive value, thus causing the reduction of dairy productivity of a herd. Small-size grazing is still efficient for farms with few livestock. As a rule, cattle of private holding are grazed on poor pastures used without any set system. It forces owners to compensate any shortage in feeding on the pasture with additional fodder when the cattle come back for mid-day (thrice daily milking)and evening milking. Production of silage and haylage Silage and haylage are only made by large agricultural enterprises. 15,518,900 tons were made in 1999 that is 19.5 percent less than in 1998 and 47.1 percent less compared to 1994. Waxy and milky-waxy maize, sunflower at onset of flowering, annual leguminous-poaceous and poaceous plant formations, and perennial grasses are the main raw materials for silage. Silage is made in trenches, silos or surface mounds and covered with polyethylene film further covered with a 5-6 cm soil layer. Due to financial problems in 1999, only 503,000 tons of silage was covered by film. Silos are more often covered with straw. Poor sealing of silos, prolonged (over 5 days) filling of the silos, non-observance of timing for plant mowing and practically total absence of mineral additives and conservatives (only 40,700 tons were made with addition of carbamide and other conservatives in 1999) does not allow us to obtain good quality silage. The problem of production of good quality silage is of top priority today. Haymaking. Some 2,177,200 tons of hay were made in 1999 in Ukraine; that is 15.6 percent of all forage procurement (with 25.6 percent of haylage and 58.9 percent of straw). Large enterprises make hay mechanically, mainly in the loose form (82.2 percent); it is stored in the open air close to cow-sheds. Often hay is left in stacks at the places of haymaking and is carried to the farms in winter, when transport facilities and workers are free from field work. Due to machinery shortage, non-observance of haymaking technology, and mowing over mature grass (and due to frequent rains in this period in northern and western regions of the country), haymaking is accompanied by considerable losses of nutrients, giving a poor quality forage. Private holdings, where hay is the main forage, make hay manually. Grass is mown with scythes. Mowing is in mid-end of June, i.e., during the late stages of meadow vegetation because of the aim of obtaining as much forage as possible; this has an adverse impact on forage quality. Hay is then transported by tractor-trailers, truck or horses. The vehicles are provided on a cash basis or by account payment for the work done. Hay is stored in lofts of ancillary premises or in stacks in the yard (in southern regions). Seed production Today Ukraine has no reliable statistical data on production of perennial grass seeds. Seed-growing areas of perennial grasses were some 500,000 hectares in 1998 and comprised 180,000-200,000 hectares of Medicago sativa, 140,000 - 150,000 hectares of Trifolium pratense, 5,000 hectares of T. repens, 5,000 hectares of T. hybridum, 80,000 hectares of Onobrychis, 60,000 hectares of poaceous grass, 20,000 hectares of Melilotus which is used for creating meadows on slopes in the marshy woodlands and the Steppe, on salt soils and as intermediate culture in the field for feed production. In 1998 a large enthusiasm for this culture was observed; today the area of crops has been reduced by more than 10 times and from 5,000 hectares of Lotus corniculatus 28,500 tons of seed were produced in 1997; which is 69 percent of their demand. The former organised seed-production system collapsed after disintegration of the Soviet Union. Some joint-stock companies and agricultural enterprises are dealing with production of perennial grass seeds; it is made often under methodological supervision of plant breeders (originators of cultivars) who transfer their pedigree seeds under contractual grounds for foundation and commercial seed production. However, this system, having no support from the government, provides a poor solution to the seed problem. Because of economic depression in the industry, exiguous technical base and chronic poor solvency of consumers, the production of perennial grass seeds, which is far below the demand, is still decreasing. Until quite recently, plant breeders in Ukraine maintained high potentialities of types and species of perennial grasses. Their work allowed the inclusion of 165 cultivars of perennial grasses of 33 classes to be entered into the Register of Ukrainian Plants recommended for production in 2001. Among the above classes, seed production of Trifolium pratense, Medicago satvia, Dactylis glomerata, Festuca pratensis, Phleum pratensis, Bromopsis inermis are in a good state of preservation compared to others; they are considered basic classes. Trifolium pratense and Medicago sativa produce 50-60 kg/ha (The seed yield of Trifolium pratense and Medicago sativa is 60-80 kg/ha - in humid regions of the country, and 150-250 kg/ha - in the Forest-Steppe and in the Northern Steppe), Dactylis glomerata and Festuca pratensis, 250 - 500 kg/ha, Phleum pratensis, 150-200 kg/ha, Bromopsis inermis, 200-250 kg/ha. Self-pollinated species of Yaroslavna and Roksolana lucerne, bred by the Institute of Agriculture of the Ukrainian Academy of Agrarian Sciences, are able to yield 250-300 kg/ha of seed. Some agricultural enterprises in recent years grow seeds of Lolium multiflorum and its hybrids with Festuca orientalis (Yaroslav cultivar), as well as Lolium perenne; seed productivity of these reaches up to 800-1500 kg/ha. Nevertheless, use of these species in ley management is very restricted due to their lack of persistence and poor frost resistance in northern regions or poor resistance to droughts in southern areas. These grasses are the most suitable for sowing in pastures in mixes with other perennial species in moist western regions and on fertile soils in fodder crop rotation with short (2-3 years) rotation of the perennials. Seed growing for other grasses much needed for the grasslands of Ukraine (Trifolium repens, T. hybridum, Lotus corniculatus, Poa pratensis, P. palustris, Festuca rubra, Alopecurus pratensis, A. arundinaceus, Agrostis gigantea, Agripyron pectinatum, A. desertorms, Elytrigia pseudocaesia, Roegneria trachycaulon, Psathyrostachys juncea etc.) has very small scope and has no commercial significance. Ukrainian Institute of Agriculture, Feed Research Institute, Institute of Irrigation Agriculture, Institute Agriculture and Breeding of Animals in Western Regions and other scientific-research institutions are engaged in the selection and testing of new cultivars of the perennials. 6. OPPORTUNITIES FOR IMPROVEMENT OF FODDER RESOURCES It was decided to take 10, 000,000 hectares of arable land out of intensive cultivation and to put 8, 000, 000 million hectares of these under grass. It will allow the balance of agro-landscapes and restoration of environment-oriented functions of agro-ecosystems, halting of erosion processes and improvement of the quality of water resources. At the same time, it opens large opportunities for strengthening the fodder base and to increasing the livestock (cattle up to 15,800,000 head, including up to 6,000,000 dairy cows and up to 1,300,000 beef cows, and up to 6,000,000 head of sheep), increasing significantly the share of cheap grass fodder in forage resources and turning cattle out to grazing in summers. Institute of Agriculture of UAAS, Institute of Agrology and Agrochemistry of UAAS, Institute of Land Utilization of UAAS with participation of and support from the Ministry of Agrarian Policy and Ukrainian Academy of Agrarian Science have elaborated, in 2000, principal criteria and methodical recommendations for withdrawal of low-productive land from intense cultivation as well as their putting down to pasture and rational management. Having obtained financial support from the US Agency for International Development (USAID) within the framework of a project named " The program to promote sustainable development in Ukraine" in the field of "Implementation of principles of sustainable development of Ukraine on the base of elaboration of an ecology-economic pattern of development of raw material industry and preservation of bio resources" in 2001, an evaluation is being undertaken of modern conditions of natural-resource potentialities of vegetation cover in general (Institute of Botany NAS of Ukraine) and grasslands in particular (Department of Meadow Management of Institute of Agriculture of UAAS) with the purpose of devising some conceptual approaches, eliminating imbalances in ecological, economic and, consequently, in social fields of activities of our state, restoring quality of environment and preserving biodiversity. According to the Programme, the following objectives were outlined:
As defined by a conceptual model for sustainable development of Ukraine, the area of natural fodder would be increased from 8,400,000 hectares to 15,200,000 hectares; as a part of this area, fodder lands of agricultural enterprises would be extended from 5,400,000 hectares to 14,400,000 hectares. Pasture area shall reach 12,800,000 hectares, including 11,200,000 hectares of permanent pastures (3,700,000 hectares to be organised on natural fodder lands and 7,500,000 hectares to be organised on land retired from intensive cultivation). In addition to permanent pasture, 1,600,000 hectares of one-year pastures - crops of one-year grasses (sudanese grass, sorghum) will be required for the period of slow regrowth of the perennials (100,000 hectares in Polissia, 190,000 hectares in the Forest Steppe and 1,310,000 in the Steppe). If these measures are implemented, they will allow us:
The following types of arable land will be used as pastures:
Implementation of the above conceptual model requires further amplification and solution of a number of scientific and productive tasks, which in their generalised form may be expressed as follows: Many scientific-research Institutes of Ukraine are engaged in solving these problems. The Ministry of Agrarian Policy has developed "The Program for Fodder Production Development", where it has outlined a comprehensive approach to solution of these problems with consideration of main characteristics of market relations. However, massive research in the field of pasture farming as applicable to new economic conditions is only starting, and few farms demonstrate productive experience in pasture farming. Any improvements in the field rely only upon general conditions of the agrarian sector and, first of all, upon formation of a favourable economic and legal medium for normal functioning of all economic structures. Conciliation of inter-industrial relations in the agro-industrial complex and balancing the prices of food and industrial commodities (the ratio between them is 1:5 now), formation of privileged credit-finance conditions at par with use of budgetary donations to promote top priority industries (seed production of perennial forages, liming of acid soils, pasture improvement, introduction of modern technical facilities and grazing technologies, production of high-quality fodder and cattle-breeding products at agricultural enterprises), formation of favourable conditions for distribution of cattle- raising products, pedigree farming (development of breeding material) and restoration of high-productive livestock may be referred to principal strategic levers of the government. Adoption of a Grassland Code (similar to the Forest Code of Ukraine) at a legislative level is a long-felt need; this Code would govern legal relations with the purpose of providing increased productivity, protection and reproduction of grasslands on the grounds of their rational management with observance of technical schedules. The supervision shall be effected through administrative or law and order authorities at all levels and shall be realised by land users of any land ownership pattern. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATIONS AND PERSONNEL
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||