“Direto no Cerrado” The publication of the Association of Direct Drilling in the Cerrado (APDC) Year 10, No. 40, February/March 2005. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
| Supplement: “The 8th
meeting of Direct Drilling in the Cerrado” Page 6: Embrapa aims at Crop-Livestock Integration as a base for crop and animal husbandry sustainability. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Authors: Luiz Carlos Balbino and Tarcísio Cobucci (cobucci@cnpaf.embrapa.br) of ‘Embrapa Rice and Beans’[i]. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
However, according to the authors, the complex of advantages of crop-livestock integration has not yet been totally qualified nor even quantified. “Present knowledge indicates that this practice will certainly be the foundation of crop and animal husbandry sustainability in the cerrado region”, they say. The experimental area of the Emprapa Crop-Livestock Integration Project (CLIP) in Santo Antônio de Goiás comprises 100 hectares and is divided into six plots in which the crop-pasture rotations are followed as shown in Table 1 and Figure 1. Table 1. Crop-pasture rotation systems.
Brach. = brachiaria; For/sorg = forage sorghum.
Therefore, in each plot, there are 2,5 years of crops and 2,5 years of pasture. In summer, half of the experimental area is planted with forage grasses and the other half with crops. Livestock is predominant in the winter dry season. The economic results of this crop-livestock integration project in the 2003/4 cropping season were positive: there was an average stocking rate (summer and winter) of 3,25 animal units and a meat production of 780 kg/ha/year, which guaranteed a gross income of R$ 2 860,00/ha. Discounting production costs of R$ 2 200,00/ha (which does not include the cost of land or capital investment interest), a net receipt of R$ 660,00/ha is achieved. The net income was from 315 kg of meat/ha/year, which was needed to compete with highly profitable crops as in the case of soybean in this harvest. “It was an excellent result when one considers the average profit from traditional livestock production, which oscillates between R$ 100,00 and 150,00/ha” says Balbino. In the crop plots, such as soybean, 2 500 kg/ha were harvested; with
maize, 4 750 and with rice, 3 250 kg/ha. The cost of animal production
includes the value of the calves. This is why it was well above that
of the crops: R$ 2 200,00/ha against R$ 1 103,00 for rice, R$ 1 184,00
for maize and R$ 1 200,00 for soybean. The calves were introduced when
8-9 months old, weighing on average 142,5 kg and then gained 97,5 kg/head
during 12 months of feeding (May to April), reaching 240 kg/head. Discounting
the production costs (not including the cost of land or capital investment
interest), a net receipt of R$ 550,00/ha for soybean, R$ 431,00/ha for
maize and R$ 1 302,00/ha for rice was achieved. When considering all
the activities developed in the project’s 100 hectares the profit was
R$ 70 898,00 or R$ 708,00/ha; an excellent profit with diminished risks. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
[i] Embrapa Arroz e Feijão. Rodovia Goiânia- Nova Veneza, Km 12, Caixa Postal 179, Santo Antônio de Goiás - GO, CEP 75375-000, Brazil. |