Grain Corn Silage and Forage Corn Silage Evaluation on the Nelore and Canchim Cattle Performance in Feedlot

Anselmo Jose Spadotto1, Antonio Carlos Silveira2, Luiz Roberto Furlan3, Mario de Beni Arrigoni4, Ciniro Costa5, Henrique Nunes de Oliveira6, Claudinei Parre7

1UNESP-IB/IBD;
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7UNESP-FMVZ
Botucatu – Sao Paulo – BRAZIL

E-mail: spadotto@surfnet.com.br


An experiment was carried out to evaluate corn grain and corn forage variety productivity and nutritive value of silage based on the performance of cattle in a feedlot. A completely randomised design was used with a 2 x 2 factorial arrangement based on two breeds (Nelore and Canchim) and two corn varieties (grain and forage). The maize was harvested 120 days after sowing, when plants showed more than 2/3 of dry leaves and grains were in the dough stage. The silage was stored in 400 t silos. The experimental diet consisted of grain or forage corn silage, 7.2 liters of liquid yeast (1.5 kg of dry yeast/head/day) and 1.1 kg of ground corn (1.0 kg of dry matter/head/day). The experiment duration was 110 days, with a 20 days adaptation period and 90 days for data collection. Animals were weighed every 28 days. It was concluded that corn grain was more appropriate for silage than corn forage, because at the same stage of growth it produced a better quality silage with a higher dry matter content and a 41.3% higher grain yield, promoting higher weight gain and better feed/gain ratio in the feedlot beef cattle.


Table 1
: Forage corn variety: Yield characteristics and composition.

Parameters

Forage Corn Variety

Forage Corn

Grain Corn

As fed yield 1 (ton/ha)

45.00

27.20

Dry matter (%)

32.00

44.00

Yield DM 2 (ton/ha)

14.40

12.00

Grain yield (ton/ha)

5.40

6.40

Remainder 3 (ton/ha)

9.00

5.60

Grains in DM (%)

37.50

53.00

1. As fed matter
2. Dry matter
3. Remainder of the plant

 

Table 2: Corn silage: Chemical characteristics and pH.

Parameters

Corn variety

Forage Corn

Grain Corn

Dry matter (%)

34.80*

45.60*

Crude protein (%)

7.37

8.32

Acid detergent fiber (%)

26.10*

23.80*

Lignin (%)

4.10*

2.80*

Ammoniacal nitrogen 1 (mg)

8.73*

6.52*

Acid detergent insoluble nitrogen (mg)

8.02*

6.12*

PH

3.96

3.20

Cellulose (%)

19.53

18.62

1. Ammoniacal nitrogen as a percent of total nitrogen.
* Significant at the level of 5% of probability.

 

Table 3: Animal performance during 90 days in feedlot.

Breed

Corn variety

Mean

Forage Corn

Grain Corn

DG1

DFI2

FG3

DG

DFI

FG

DG

DFI

FG

Nelore

0.79

10.09

12.77

1.17

10.23

8.74

0.98

10.16

10.76

Canchim

1.29

9.39

7.28

1.38

9.63

6.98

1.33

9.51

7.13

Mean

1.04

9.74

10.03

1.28

9.93

7.86

     

DG: Daily weight gain (kg/day)
DFI: Dry matter intake (kg/day)
FG: Feed/gain ratio (kg DM/kg DG)
1. CV = 16.0%
2. CV = 6.9%
3. CV = 7.3

 

Table 4: Dry matter intake.

Intake (kg/day)

Corn variety

Grain Corn

Forage Corn

Dry matter

9.93

9.74

Concentrate

2.50

2.50

Ground corn

1.00

1.00

Yeast

1.50

1.50

Silage

7.43

7.24

Grains corn from the silage

3.94

2.71

Remainder of the plant

3.49

4.53

     

Total intake of corn

   

(Concentrate + silage)

4.94

3.71

Total of concentrate

   

(Concentrate + grains from the silage)

6.64

5.21

Total forage

3.49

4.53

Forage: concentrate ratio

35:65

46:54

Daily gain

1.28

1.04