Global Plan of Action

Activity 6.
Regenerating threatened ex situ accessions

94. Assessment: As accessions in ex situ storage decline in viability, both genes and genotypes are lost.

Even under optimal ex situ storage conditions, all accessions eventually require regeneration.

Capacity for regenerating was often not considered when assembling collections and disseminating accessions, with the unintended consequence that much material collected in the past cannot now be properly maintained.

Consequently, a large backlog of materials requiring regeneration exists today.

An average of 50 percent of current national collections are in need of regenerating, according to substantial but incomplete data provided in Country Reports.

Good planning and coordination will minimize the amount of material to be regenerated.

But, without prompt and significant intervention, much of the stored genetic diversity of food and agricultural crops in the world - as well as the large public investment made in assembling the collections - will be lost forever.

95. Low initial sample size and low viability as well as frequent demand for samples from long­term facilities can shorten the regeneration cycle.

But, because proper long­term storage conditions should obviate the need for regeneration for decades, one might expect average, routine, on­going annual regeneration requirements (as opposed to multiplication needs) to amount to fewer than 10 percent of accessions so conserved.

However, some 95 percent of countries responding with specific information on regeneration report a far higher level of need, and most countries, both developed and developing, report technical, financial or other constraints to regenerating their material.

Perhaps one million accessions may need to be regenerated to conserve the material in ex situ programmes.

No global coordinating mechanism exists.

Lack of information on accessions constitutes an additional constraint impeding rational regeneration.

Most developing and many developed countries cite lack of long­term storage facilities, lack of facilities for handling cross­pollinated species, and inadequate funds and manpower, as major problems to overcome.

96. Long­term objectives: To establish the infrastructure needed for periodic regeneration.

97. Intermediate objectives: To formulate a strategy, establish coordinating mechanisms, identify locations for regeneration, complete agreements needed to formalize cooperation among institutions, improve capacity and infrastructure as needed, and initiate action to regenerate targeted accessions.

To complete the first world­wide regeneration of accessions in ex situ storage, under conditions designed to preserve the genetic integrity of material.

98. Policy/strategy: Priority should be given to:

  • regeneration needs of samples currently in long­term storage or intended for placement in long­term conditions and experiencing a loss of viability as opposed to those in need of multiplication for other reasons.

(Proper management will assure that accessions in long­term conditions will be regenerated mainly due to loss of viability and those in active collections multiplied due to loss of numbers.)

  • samples which meet the criteria of being globally unique, threatened, and having the potential of maintaining the diversity of the original sample.

99. Input from crop and regional networks should be sought in the refining of priorities and identification of appropriate germplasm for regeneration.

100. Identification of specific samples should be made in cooperation with national programme breeders and curators, who often have intimate and detailed knowledge of collections and of the possible availability of similar materials from in situ locations.

101. As appropriate and feasible, regeneration efforts should strive to maintain the allelic and genotypic diversity and adapted complexes of the original sample.

102. Efforts should be encouraged to reduce unneeded redundancies within and between collections as a means of improving efficiency and minimizing on­going conservation costs.

Regeneration should not be viewed as a means of maintaining collections in sub­standard conditions on a long­term basis.

In this regard, it is noted that minimizing the frequency of regeneration is an important goal and consequence of other activities under the Global Plan of Action.

103. Governments, the private sector, institutions, including in particular the CGIAR, and NGOs should:

  • cooperate to make efficient use of existing capacity and to ensure that regeneration can take place, if scientifically, technically and administratively feasible, at sites closely approximating the origin of the original sample; and,
  • promote and facilitate access to plant genetic resources for food and agriculture stored ex situ to minimise the need for storing identical samples in several locations, and the consequent need to regenerate each of them.

104. Characterization activities should be undertaken in conjunction with regeneration, as feasible, without compromising the effectiveness or scientific goals of the regeneration exercise.

105. Capacity: As appropriate and cost efficient, proper facilities, human resources, appropriate technology, and equipment should be made available to national programmes and international institutions involved in regeneration activities undertaken as part of the Global Plan.

Particular attention should be given to establishing or strengthening capacity for the regeneration of cross­pollinated species.

Consideration should be given to involving the private sector, farmers, and NGOs in this activity.

106. Genebanks should ensure monitoring and have the capacity for determining the status of their accessions and prioritizing those in need of regeneration.

107. Training programmes should take into consideration the need for personnel trained in the execution of the procedures of germplasm regeneration and in the unique regeneration requirements of specific species.

108. Research/technology: Guidelines for regeneration, and as appropriate, standards and specific technologies should continue to be developed.

Guidelines should, inter alia, provide guidance on how accessions are chosen for regeneration.

They should take planning and management into account as well as applicability to different institutional situations and collection purposes.

109. Scientific methodologies for identifying and prioritizing choices of accessions to be regenerated through national as well as global efforts should be further developed.

110. There is a need to reinforce research to improve conservation technologies in various fields: lengthening of the interval between two regeneration cycles (orthodox seeds), physiological mechanisms linked to low temperature tolerance and dehydration (recalcitrant seeds), and in vitro conservation technologies.

111. Research should be undertaken to increase the effectiveness and efficiency of regeneration efforts, including methodologies for minimizing genetic drifts, the identification of markers associated with seed longevity to assist in devising regeneration strategies, to develop an understanding of the causes of mutations in conserved germplasm, to eliminate seed borne pests, and to answer various questions regarding breeding systems, reproductive biology, and dormancy mechanisms and technical problems associated with regeneration practices.

112. Data on existing accessions in ex situ collections should be assembled and analysed in order to assist in planning and implementation.

113. Coordination/administration: An operational plan for a coordinated, global regeneration effort should be developed, and implemented by the appropriate agency or agencies.

It should include identification of institutions and locations for regeneration, be based on sound scientific practices, and consider the need for cost efficiency.

The active involvement of crop and regional networks is important to the success of regeneration efforts, particularly in the identification and prioritization of germplasm to be regenerated.

Similarly, national plans for regeneration should be formulated particularly in regard to plant genetic resources for food and agriculture of purely national importance.

114. There should be on­going monitoring of the need for regeneration, including consideration of the necessity of adequate duplication, storage behaviour of the species, storage conditions, and individual accession viability.

115. This activity is closely linked with:

  • Sustaining existing ex situ collections
  • Constructing comprehensive information systems for plant genetic resources for food and agriculture
  • Expanding the characterization, evaluation and number of core collections to facilitate use
  • Building strong national programmes
  • Promoting networks for plant genetic resources for food and agriculture

TOC