Guidelines on Good Practice for
Aerial Application of Pesticides
Food and Agriculture Organization
of the United Nations
Rome, 2001
CONTENTS
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
BACKGROUND
1.INTRODUCTION
1.1 Guideline objectives
1.2 Training for pilots and ground support staff
1.3 Spray equipment selection
1.4 Using pesticides correctly
1.5 Managing operator exposure
2.THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS
2.1 Alternatives to pesticide use
2.2 Risk/Benefit consideration
2.3 Product selection
2.4 Label information
2.5 Tank mixing
3. SAFETY ASPECTS
3.1 Operator health surveillance
3.2 Product transport and storage
3.3 Product handling
3.4 Chemical container management
3.5 Accident procedures
3.6 Personal protection
4. APPLICATION
4.1 Pre-application
4.1.1 Spray equipment
4.1.2 Equipment serviceability
4.1.3 Adjustment and control checks
4.1.4 Conventional spray calibration
4.1.5 ULV spray calibration
4.1.6 Tank filling
4.1.7 Prior warnings
4.2 Field application
4.2.1 Field survey
4.2.2 Meteorological considerations
4.2.3 Treatment timing
4.2.4 Airstrip operation
4.2.5 Field operation
4.2.6 Sprayer field settings
4.2.7 Chemical handling
4.2.8 Chemical container handling
4.2.9 Post-treatment warnings
4.3 Post-application
4.3.1 Cleaning (“decontamination”) of equipment and PPE
4.3.2 Disposal of surplus spray
4.3.3 Disposal of empty chemical containers
4.3.4 Equipment maintenance and repair
4.3.5 Equipment storage
4.3.6 Pesticide storage
5. RECORDINGS
5.1 Field spray records
5.2 Equipment repairs and maintenance
5.3 Operator health surveillance
5.4 Personal protective equipment
5.5 Local emergency contacts
6. ANNEXES
6.1 References
6.2 Local emergency contacts
Acknowledgements
These guidelines were prepared by Alan Lavers, Hereford, UK. The
valuable information and comments received from international experts
from both the public and private sectors are acknowledged.
Background
Since 1995, FAO AGSE has worked to improve the safety and efficiency
of pesticides within systems of sustainable agriculture and integrated
pest management (IPM). This began with the publication of guidelines
to assist member states to control the quality of the most commonly
used types of application equipment. The first versions of the FAO
guidelines on pesticide application equipment were approved for publication
in May 1997 by; the FAO Panel of Experts on Pesticide Specifications,
Registration Requirements, Application Standards and Prior Informed
Consent; and the FAO Panel of Experts on Agricultural Engineering.
In 2001, FAO AGSE produced a new, revised and expanded series of
pesticide application equipment-related guidelines. The presented
guideline covers the application of pesticides using spray aircraft.
A similar guideline covers the use of field crop, tree and bush crop
sprayers:
Guidelines on good practice for ground application of pesticides;
These guidelines have been prepared to offer practical help and guidance
to all those involved in using pesticides for food and fibre production
and in public health programmes. They have been drawn up to cover
the main terrestrial and aerial spray application techniques.
The series consists of the following other guidelines:
Guidelines on minimum requirements for agricultural pesticide
application equipment;
An important objective of these guidelines is to assist FAO and other
agencies to ensure that sprayers purchased are safe to users and to
the environment as well as being efficient and durable in operation.
Even the cheapest sprayer models should meet minimum standards of
safety and durability.
They take into account equipment that is already on the market, many
of which already meet the requirements. The prime objective therefore
is that member countries should adopt these guidelines immediately,
to begin to eliminate substandard and unsafe sprayers from national
markets and ultimately from the international scene.
Guidelines on standards for agricultural pesticide sprayers and
related test procedures;
These guidelines are more demanding than the minimum requirements
and provide more precise safety targets for spray equipment. They
consist of detailed specifications and requirements, supported by
test procedures to measure compliance with the proposed standards.
The guidelines cover the major types of portable (operator-carried),
vehicle-mounted and trailed agricultural pesticide sprayers manufactured
in or supplied to FAO member countries.
Guidelines on procedures for the registration, certification and
testing of new pesticide application equipment;
These guidelines outline a further way by which governments can influence
pesticide safety by controlling the quality of the pesticide application
equipment manufactured in or imported into the country. By incorporating
into national legislation, a requirement for manufacturers and importers
to declare that application equipment meets standard of safety and
durability, it should be possible to gradually reduce and eventually
eliminate sub-standard equipment from the market.
Guidelines on the organization of schemes for testing and certification
of agricultural pesticide sprayers in use
This publication covers the testing and certification of the sprayers
currently applying pesticides on commercial farms. They address an
urgent need in many countries to ensure that where pesticides are
used in crop production, they are applied through equipment, which
is safe and fully functional. The issue applies to both large, field-crop
and orchard sprayers as well as to operator-carried equipment.
Guidelines on the organization and operation of training schemes
and certification procedures for operators of pesticide application
equipment.
These guidelines consider the training, testing and certification
of those who actually operate pesticide application equipment. Even
the most well designed and maintained sprayer can do immeasurable
damage in the hands of an unskilled operator and the importance of
these guidelines should not be underestimated.
1. INTRODUCTION
When using an approved pesticide the objective is to distribute the
correct dose to a defined target with the minimum of wastage due to
drift using the most appropriate spraying equipment. Acceptable spray
distribution is relatively easy to achieve with most ground-based
directed spraying, but spray application with fixed and rotary wing
aircraft presents more complex problems. The purpose of this guide
is to identify some of the problems and to suggest means of addressing
them. Although the number of aircraft licensed for aerial spraying
has decreased recently, where large uniform areas have to be rapidly
treated, aircraft application is usually considered to be more fuel-efficient
than ground spraying. Aircraft are used to apply both liquid and solid
materials as well as to broadcast seed when soil conditions prohibit
the use of ground equipment.
The regulations and any country laws relating to aircraft spraying
must always be observed.
These guidelines have been prepared to offer practical help to all
those involved in applying pesticides by air for food and fibre production
and apply equally for vector control in public health programmes.
The potential for high productivity and safe aircraft deployment can
only be realised when the spray operation is well organised and the
people involved are fully trained and aware of their responsibilities.
Aerial spraying can be used to treat large areas quickly and, unlike
ground spraying, can be carried out when field conditions prevent
wheeled vehicle access, which enables the timing of spray treatments
to be improved and soil compaction reduced. There are however, certain
disadvantages associated with aircraft spraying. High wind speed and
temperature inversion may limit treatment application whilst trees,
waterways, environmental considerations and overhead power lines may
also prevent some fields from being treated. Accurate deposition in
dense crop canopies can also be more difficult to achieve with aircraft.
Volatility and spray drift can be a problem with aerial spraying and
environmental contamination can be significant if spraying is incorrectly
executed.
Where local codes of practice for pesticide use and application,
and local Civil Aviation (CA) regulations are already in place, these
guidelines are offered as additional guidance. The importance of referring
to the existing legislation cannot be over emphasised, as the failure
to comply may have legal implications if a product complaint arises
or an off-target contamination incident occurs.
1.1 Guideline objectives
These guidelines have been drawn up to cover the application of both
conventional aqueous undiluted sprays and ultra-low volume (ULV) formulations.
They provide information and advice on safe practices.
For adequate aerial spray operation the following considerations
must be addressed:
a) Close co-operation between the grower, the spray contractor and
the pilot
b) Adequate pre-planning before spraying
c) Awareness and understanding of local environmental considerations
d) Consideration of the safety of people, animals and non-target crops
e) Accurate selection of approved products
f) Use of appropriate spray technology and well maintained equipment
g) Competent and well trained management and support staff
h) Pilot awareness
1.2 Training for pilots and ground support staff
Adherence to local requirements must be the starting point for all
those involved in aerial spray application. Training is required for
ground support staff as well as for the pilot. The local Civil Aviation
Authority will normally administer the pilot’s flying licence and
a permit to apply pesticides, however, additional training in the
techniques of spraying is usually required to qualify for agricultural
work. Whilst a private pilots licence can usually be obtained locally,
training for agricultural work may have to be undertaken elsewhere
at a recognised centre.
A pilot must prove competence in the use of pesticides related to:
a) Appropriateness of the pesticide and formulation
b) The correct dose rate, application technique and procedures
c) Awareness of the hazards associated with the use of the product
d) First aid procedures in the event of an accident
In some countries spray contractors work to agreed company guidelines
which are regularly checked and updated by the Civil Aviation and
/or other authorities, who issue operator licences and register individual
spray aircraft as airworthy and compliant with the specifications
for spray operation.
Ground support staff (mixers, loaders and flagmen) must be adequately
trained to ensure that they are fully protected and the spray operation
is as safe as possible. Ground-based functions cover two distinct
operations:
a) Mixers and loaders
b) Field staff and flagmen
a) The mixer/loaders
These staff must be fully conversant with their company procedures,
operating manuals and practices so that products are safely mixed
and loaded into the aircraft hopper in the correct amounts at the
recommended dilutions.
Protecting the mixer/loader is a high priority as exposure potential
is high when handling concentrated pesticides. Where many aircraft
sorties are flown from each airstrip this results in extended periods
of exposure of the ground crews and increased risk. Engineering controls
such as closed chemical transfer devices, returnable containers and
pre-measured chemical dose packs should be used to reduce the risk
to ground staff.
Training must therefore cover the safe and correct use of chemical
loading and transfer systems and the use of personal protective equipment
(PPE).
b) Field staff and flagmen.
Field staff members are responsible for meeting legal requirements
for operational safety as well as for issuing warnings to those likely
to be effected by the spray operation such as local beekeepers, and
those adjacent to the area to be sprayed. Before spraying, the field
staff will visit the site to be treated, noting obstacles such as
trees, overhead power-lines, waterways, roads and houses which may
be flown over during the spraying. Frequently an additional requirement
of ground staff is to provide the link between the spray contractor
and members of the general public.
The use of a Global Positioning Satellite (GPS) system for aircraft
navigation is strongly recommended as a safer alternative to the use
of human flagmen however, where human flagmen are used, they should
be:
· able to select and use appropriate personal protective equipment;
· aware of the need to avoid contamination by working upwind
from the flight path;
· aware that records of the pesticides used during the day
must be readily available (e.g. for use in cases of intoxication of
the worker or his family);
· able to communicate with the pilot and the staff at the loading
area in the event of a change in the weather that might effect the
spray operation. N.B. weather conditions at the airstrip may be very
different from those at the site to be sprayed;
· appropriately trained and in possession of a recognised certificate
of competence, which should be regularly updated.
Trainers, with specialist knowledge and understanding of aerial spraying,
should be used to train ground crews.
1.3 Spray equipment selection
The selection and use of appropriate spray equipment plays an essential
role in safe and efficient pesticide use. In order to obtain a licence,
aircraft have to be checked by the local Civil Aviation Authority,
however, spray equipment must also be approved. Much of the spray
equipment is common to that which is used on terrestrial equipment,
however, where aircraft are to be used for applying undiluted formulations
(ULV), the sprayer system and components should be made from materials
which are compatible with such formulations. Where reduced liquid
flow rates for ULV spraying are used, a spray monitoring system and
a flow meter are essential.
The Civil Aviation Authority, in collaboration with the Ministry
of Agriculture or other designated institution, should verify the
spray system. This should include checks on the spray system, calibration
and spray distribution to ensure that all valves, anti-drip devices,
and spray nozzles are working satisfactorily. The accuracy of calibration
of spray monitoring systems should also be checked.
1.4 Using pesticides correctly
Product selection should be made taking into consideration the environmental
risk, the potential operator exposure hazard and the recommended dose
rates. The products chosen must be used strictly in accordance with
the label specification.
The majority of pesticide products and formulations approved for conventional
aerial spraying are similar to products applied through conventional
ground sprayers, however, when applied by air they are generally used
at lower water volumes and therefore at higher spray solution concentrations.
Where products used are not designed for aerial application, some
formulations can present problems such as thickening, excessive foaming
and emulsion inversion.
1.5 Managing operator exposure
The speed of operation and the large areas that can be rapidly treated
using spray aircraft make managing exposure an important consideration
when selecting a pesticide. Product toxicology influences operator
exposure-time limitations and methods and techniques to keep operator
exposure to a minimum should be carefully considered in the product
selection process.
Label recommendations and the instructions on the use of PPE must
be carefully followed.
Engineering controls, such as closed chemical transfer systems, to
reduce operator contamination when handling and loading the concentrate
material are essential to minimise operator exposure. These systems
must be capable of accurately extracting and measuring products from
their original containers and should be easy to calibrated for products
of different viscosities.
Operator health surveillance to is an important requirement. All
staff must undergo regular health checks, which should include blood
tests. Effective worker health monitoring can indicate changes in
health of an individual attributed to working with particular pesticides.
2. THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS
The use of a pesticide may put people, other life forms, and the
environment at risk, therefore the decision to use a pesticide should
only be taken when all other alternative control measures have been
fully considered and its use controlled within an integrated control
programme. (see 2.1 below)
2.1 Alternatives to pesticide use
The alternatives to pesticide use can be divided into Natural and
Applied Control measures. Natural control may utilise naturally occurring
pest enemies, or rely on meteorological conditions to effect pest
and disease control. Applied Control can include crop rotation, the
selection of disease resistant crop varieties, changes in sowing dates
as well the use of pesticides. The system, which offers the least
hazard should always be selected. If local pesticide regulations are
not in place the International Code of Conduct on the Distribution
and Use of Pesticides (Amended version) FAO, offers guidance.
2.2 Risk/Benefit consideration
The risks and benefits of using a pesticide must be addressed before
selecting a pesticide product. By completing a risk assessment, harmful
effects can be minimized.
In some cases a prophylactic treatment e.g. seed treatment may be
justified but the effect of weeds pest and disease on crop yield reduction
should be monitored to determine when it is economically justified
to use a pesticide.
Such information should be gathered by systematically by regular inspection
of the crop to monitor numbers of pest and beneficial organisms or
weed species and their appearance frequency, in combination with the
use of insect traps to assist treatment timing. An understanding of
the pests life cycle and the crop’s ability to compensate for any
pest or disease damage, will also help in decision-making.
2.3 Product selection
The decision to select a given pesticide product must be based on
an assessment of the risks and benefits and the hazard potential to
both man and the environment.
In many, but not all, countries legislation is in place to control
and regulate the manufacture, importation, distribution and sale of
pesticides. Products are registered for use following local field
evaluation for safety and efficiency and only approved and recommended
products can be used.
Where there is a choice of product, the material offering the least
hazard should always be selected. Where local pesticide regulations
are not in place the International Code of Conduct on the Distribution
and Use of Pesticides (Amended version) FAO, offers guidance.
2.4 Label information
The manufacturer’s product label is the main source of information
for the end user. It should be read and understood by anyone using
the product. The user must also make sure that the label terminology
is fully understood. The label is attached to the product container
and usually reproduced on the outer container or wrapper of the transport
container or carton. In most countries, adhering to the label recommendations
is a legal obligation.
DO NOT USE AN UNAPPROVED OR NON-LABELLED PRODUCT
The product label carries statutory instructions for the user, and
must cover the crops for which it is registered, the recommended dose
rate, the number of treatments permitted during the growing season
and how many days before harvest the last treatment may be applied.
Additionally, the label will inform the user of the correct PPE to
be used when handling and applying the product and advise on environmental
protection measures to be carried out. Such measures may refer to
a “non-spray” barrier (buffer zone).
Buffer zones
A buffer zone is an untreated area wide enough to capture drift fallout
adjacent to the sprayed area. Nozzle type, droplet size, product dose,
dilution and spray technique should be considered when this unsprayed
barrier (buffer) width is determined.
For aircraft spraying the buffer zone needs to be wider than for
ground spraying as it is more difficult to make a precise spray cut-off
with an aircraft operating at speed. The width of a buffer zone is
also influenced by the pesticide product type and by the presence
of adjacent waterways.
For example, a buffer zone of 5,000 m is recommended for certain organochlorine
insecticides. This distance is considered adequate to capture sedimenting
spray droplets following the completion of a spray run.
Some pesticides are highly toxic to aquatic life so that spray drift
fallout over water should be carefully avoided with products with
this classification.
The product label should provide application details, which should
include nozzle selection, volume applied, and application timing.
When ULV applications are to be made using rotary atomisers, liquid
flow regulation and atomiser rotational speed should also be stated
on the label.
The label usually carries first aid information to assist a doctor
in the event of accidental contamination.
Information on cleaning (“decontamination”) and disposal of empty
containers is also usually included on the label.
2.5 Tank mixing
Applying more than one product at the same time (tank-mixing) can
improve the logistics and cost of spraying provided the respective
treatment timings coincide and the formulations are chemically and
physically compatible. Only approved mixtures should be used.
Risks associated with tank mixing may include a reduction in biological
activity due to product antagonism. This may be present as crop scorch,
which although it may be only transient, can often reduce final yield.
The most common limitation, however, is physical incompatibility,
which can result in nozzle and filter blockage as well as phase separation
in the spray tank where agitation is inadequate. This is common when
during flights to the spray area (ferry flights) the spray pump is
secured or turned off in the case of an electrically driven pump.
This means that there is no circulation of the spray liquid back to
the tank.
Where aircraft are refilled from a ground (“nurse”) tank, frequent
re-circulation of the contents will ensure that there is no phase
separation within the nurse tank.
Product labels should give advice on tank mixing and approved mixture
partners, information on the sequence of introducing the products
into the tank and the need for agitation.
Water temperature, quality and pH can also influence chemical stability
of tank mixes.
3. SAFETY ASPECTS
The overall safety of crop protection chemicals must be the objective
of all users and those engaged in the storage, distribution and retailing
of agrochemicals.
3.1 Operator health surveillance
The health of operators exposed to pesticide must be monitored. The
surveillance should cover health records and medical checks, which
can alert medical authorities of any health changes, which might be
related to exposure during work with pesticides. Health surveillance
should also help determine whether safety practices and the selection
and use of PPE are adequate for the products being used.
3.2 Product transport and storage
Transporting pesticides by road is usually controlled within respective
country regulations for the movement of dangerous goods, where emergency
procedures in the event of a road accident are already in place. Many
pesticide manufacturers issue “Transport Emergency Cards (“Tremcards”),
to vehicle drivers transporting hazardous goods, which may include
pesticides.
As well as the journey from the retailer to the end user, pesticide
containers will also be moved in and out of store and to the airstrip
on the farm. Containers must be checked for leaks and damage and must
always remain fully and clearly labelled. This is particularly important
for aircraft spraying where large drums are stored outside and are
exposed to the vagaries of the weather.
PESTICIDES MUST ONLY BE TRANSPORTED AND STORED
IN THEIR ORIGINAL TRANSPORT CONTAINERS AND PACKAGES
It is usual for large quantities of pesticide to be stored and handled
at permanent airstrips. Such stores must be secure, as they may be
remote and not always attended. Shade must be provided for chemical
stocks, particularly when they are packed in 200 litre drums.
Ground support staff must be fully conversant with procedures in
the event of accidental spillage or operator contamination at airstrips,
which must have fully maintained first-aid kits, an emergency shower
unit and adequate quantities of absorbent materials to deal with spillage.
Pesticide stores and storage areas must be accessible in the case
of an emergency.
Storing pesticides on the farm may be covered by local legislation.
Correct and safe storage is essential to maintain a safe working environment,
to maximise product shelf life and to minimise the risk of fire and
spillage.
Pesticides must be kept in a dedicated store, which is accessible
in case of emergency and can be locked when not in use. When considering
erecting a pesticide store, guidelines relating to construction materials,
design, location, emergency procedures etc. can usually be obtained
from national regulatory authorities.
Further information on product storage can be obtained from the Guidelines
for Packaging and Storage of Pesticides (FAO 1985), which also contains
information on the establishment of permanent airstrips.
Under no circumstances must pesticides be stored near foodstuffs.
3.3 Product handling
The product label is usually the first reference for guidance on
handling formulated pesticide products. It will usually describe the
requirements for the use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) both
for handling the undiluted (concentrate) product and for diluted spray
solution.
Operator exposure and environmental contamination can be substantially
reduced when closed filling systems are used to extract the product
from its shipping container and deliver it either directly to the
spray tank or via a metering system to a separate mixing tank. This
avoids contact with the loading crew and accidental spillage. Some
closed transfer systems can empty and rinse chemical containers automatically
and can eliminate the need for rinsing empty containers and the disposal
of the contaminated water.
3.4 Chemical container management
On no account must empty chemical containers be reused. Empty containers
must be thoroughly washed and rendered unusable before disposal. Empty
containers can be effectively cleaned by manual methods or by a closed
transfer system that collects the washing water (rinsate). Empty containers
must be collected and securely stored prior to disposal and should
not be left unsecured at the mixing site.
Some countries allow controlled burial for empty and thoroughly cleaned
containers whilst high-temperature incineration is permitted in other
cases. Local environmental pollution control regulations must be consulted.
Chemical container management can be facilitated where products are
purchased in returnable containers. In this case sealed containers
are returned to the manufacturer for re-filling; a process, which
often can be repeated several times during the life of a container.
An approved, compatible extraction system to both measure and extract
the chemical for use is required and systems must be capable of handling
products of different viscosities and containers of different closure
sizes.
3.5 Accident procedures
If spillage occurs during transport or handling a pesticide, this
may result in a fire, injury to humans, property damage or environmental
contamination. Rapid action must follow the accident to contain and
minimise any adverse effects. Pesticide transporters and users must
be familiar with label recommendations and procedures to be followed.
In the event of an accident, the appropriate authorities (Environment,
Water, Police etc) must be notified. Records must be kept of all incidents
and remedial action taken.
Only vehicles correctly equipped to carry pesticides must be used
to transport product to the airstrip.
3.6 Personal protection
Pesticides enter the body through:
a) ingestion/swallowing through the mouth, accidental or deliberate;
b) dermal, through the skin when handling, measuring and pouring;
c) inhalation of small particles or dust when handling, spraying and
flagging.
Of the above three routes, dermal exposure is the most common hazard.
Avoiding exposure by the use of appropriate protective clothing and
equipment (PPE), and paying attention to personal hygiene by washing
exposed parts of the body after work and before eating, smoking and
toileting will minimize risk. Personal protective equipment must be
selected in accordance with the label recommendation. It must be comfortable
to wear/use and be made of material, which will prevent penetration
of the pesticide.
Where undiluted formulations are applied as ULV sprays, specific
PPE requirements are stated on the product label. ULV treatments require
PPE, which is approved for the particular product in use.
PPE must bear an approval mark and should be comfortable to wear
and not restrictive in use. The material used for PPE manufacture
must prevent penetration of the particular formulation to be used
(break-through time). PPE will only remain efficient if it is correctly
maintained. Where damaged, repairs must restore it to its original
specification and if this is not possible the item must be replaced.
Respirators must be checked on a regular basis and filter elements
replaced in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions.
The operation of an airstrip involves additional safety considerations.
As well as PPE for the ground crew and field staff, appropriate fire
extinguishers must be provided for both the aircraft and the airstrip.
The pilot must have a crash helmet and an approved safety harness
for cockpit use and a respirator/fresh-air mask.
4. APPLICATION
4.1 Pre-application
Time taken to check spray equipment before use will reduce costly
delays when the season begins.
Pre-season operational checks can be carried out with clean water
but safety clothing should always be worn. Any checks suggested in
this publication will be additional to the procedures specifically
laid out by the equipment manufacturers in their user instructions.
4.1.1 Spray equipment
It is essential that the equipment is appropriate for the pesticide
formulation to be sprayed. Conventional aqueous solutions are applied
through hydraulic systems but where materials are to be applied undiluted
(ULV), suitable atomisers must be fitted to the spray booms instead
of nozzles.
Pumping and plumbing layouts are common to both application techniques
but certain system components may have to be changed in cases where
an aircraft is used for ULV spraying. Liquid flow rates for ULV spraying
are lower than those for conventional spraying so that aircraft using
this method require to be fitted with a spray liquid flow meter.
4.1.2 Equipment serviceability
Before spraying, several key points related to the equipment must
be checked:
· Structures on and around the airstrip: steps, ladders, handrails
and loading equipment must all be checked for serviceability.
· Guards on engine driven pumping and filling systems must
be in place and secure.
· The aircraft’s maintenance manual and the spray equipment
manufacturers instructions must always be consulted in the first instance.
· The pilot and the support staff are responsible for the
aircraft’s airworthiness, however, in many cases, the spraying system
is maintained by an aircraft mechanic who must be trained and fully
protected when working on the spray equipment.
· When starting up the system, before spraying it is advisable
to initially rotate the spray pump by hand, irrespective of drive
type (wind, hydraulic or electric) to ensure that it is free to turn.
· Blade angle on some wind driven pumps can be checked for
adjustment and the transport brake, for locking the pump during ferry
runs, must be fully clear when released.
· All filters must be in place and self fill valves and couplings
clean and serviceable.
· Hoses and hose joints must be visually assessed, and where
component parts are wired to the aircraft for security the condition
of the wires must be checked.
· In the cockpit, operation of the three way valve must be
positive and the hopper emergency dump mechanism safe and operational.
· Nozzles and nozzle bodies must be checked for wear and damage
and the diaphragm check valves must be in good condition to ensure
a positive spray cut-off. Rotary atomisers must be in balance and
rotate freely. If they are blade driven, the blades must be free from
damage and correctly adjusted for the selected rotational speed (droplet
size control). Liquid flow restrictor adjustment must to be checked
and adjusted for the required throughput for the desired application
rate.
· It may not be possible to fully pressurise the spray system
on the ground, particularly where the spray pump is wind driven, but
at some stage the system must be checked for leaks. The aircraft will
have to be flown to check the operation of the spray system and the
efficiency of the pressure gauge. If the gauge does not return to
zero when the spraying system is switched off the three way valve
may not be closing correctly. This in turn will reduce the efficiency
of the “suck-back” circuit when the spray is turned off.
· Aircraft mounted electronic equipment such as the spray liquid
flowmeter, output printer and navigational aid system have to be checked
and re-calibrated against manufacturers calibration figures.
4.1.3 Adjustment and control checks
The spray system on/off and liquid flow rate controls are adjusted
by the pilot during the operational checks. The spraying system must
be checked as outlined above (see Section 4.1.2) and the boom orientation
in relation to flight direction may have to be adjusted to alter droplet
size from hydraulic nozzles. Nozzle selection can be made according
to product label recommendation but nozzle types; spray angles and
throughputs must not be mixed on the boom. Boom orientation and nozzle
positioning must be finally verified to ensure vortex creation is
minimum.
Where rotary atomisers are used, they should be adjusted for similar
speeds. Occasionally inboard atomisers are adjusted to compensate
for the increase in air speed from fuselage “screw”, and the manufacturer’s
instructions should be referred to. Where liquid flow rate is controlled
using an adjustable restrictor, it is important to ensure that the
liquid feed is the same for each atomiser. Atomiser speed is monitored
via a tachometer unit that feeds information for individual atomiser
rotational speeds to a cockpit-readout.
4.1.4 Conventional spray calibration
The Ministry of Agriculture may have in place a schedule of use guidelines
for spray aircraft that include regular spray system calibration and
distribution checks and general equipment serviceability assessments.
To ensure such that checks are efficiently carried out the use of
an independent agency or service is recommended.
Spray equipment calibration must be carried out at the start of each
season, after equipment repair or when changing application technique.
There are three major factors, which influence sprayer calibration:
a) Speed over the ground (km/h)
b) Swath width and lane separation
c) Liquid flow rate (1/min)
a) Forward speed over the ground can be determined by timing the
aircraft over a measured distance flying in both directions to compensate
for wind influence. This operation must be replicated three times
to obtain an average speed and is necessary as the aircraft instrumentation
will indicate only speed through the air.
b) Effective swath width is taken as the lane separation for each
aircraft pass and will vary between conventional and ULV application.
Recommended flying height should also be checked during field observation
as a function of swathe width.
c) The spray liquid flow rate from the nozzles at a given operating
pressure can be obtained from the nozzle manufacturer’s information
sheets. Such information is generated spraying clean water and presents
a good starting point. However, unless the nozzles are specifically
designed for it the special conditions and the low volume rates of
aerial applications may result in different flow rates than indicated
in the manufacturer’s information.
The spray liquid output from an aircraft fitted with an electric
or hydraulic driven pump can be determined on the ground but to determine
the output from a wind driven pump system the aircraft will have to
be flown at spraying speed.
4.1.5 ULV spray calibration
ULV spraying applies formulations, usually undiluted, in high concentrations
of both active ingredient and non- volatile agents. There is a high
degree of drift associated with the small droplets used for ULV spraying,
which makes the technique more suited for large areas of crop, rangeland
and for public health programmes. The actual field spraying using
aircraft is more demanding than that for conventional work because
the viscosity and therefore the flow rate of formulations vary. Initial
settings can be taken from the manufacturer’s data for water but ready-to-use
ULV formulations may have a higher viscosity and lower flow rate than
water so will have to be corrected by multiplying the total flow rate
by between 1.1 and 1.3 depending on the formulation viscosity.
Determining the speed of the aircraft over the ground is the same
as for conventional spraying, however, with ULV spraying, the swath
width will be wider as the aircraft is usually flown slightly higher.
For ULV, there are fewer spray emission points on the boom than for
conventional spraying and accordingly flying height should be increased
by 2-3 metres to allow the spray plumes from each atomiser to fully
develop and meet. Otherwise, there is the danger of leaving untreated
strips on each pass, however, and alternative solution is to increase
the number of outlet points on the booms (i.e. additional atomisers
at closer spacing). Flying height can be re-confirmed following and
assessment of spray distribution, which must be included as part of
the calibration process.
Rotary atomisers are usually propeller driven by the aircraft slipstream
but where slow aircraft or helicopters are used, electric or hydraulic
drives may be necessary. This is particularly important for helicopter
spraying where atomisers must quickly regain operational speed to
maintain the correct droplet size following sharp turns “out of and
into work”.
4.1.6 Tank filling
The spray loader is at the highest risk when handling the concentrate
pesticide and his exposure time will increase on airstrips handling
more than one aircraft for multiple sorties.
In such cases, the use of a closed chemical transfer system will reduce
the risk to both the operator and environment.
Aircraft hoppers can be top-loaded (solids), but most liquids are
loaded via a self-filler valve located on the fuselage. These valves
must be of the dry-break type and large enough to facilitate rapid
filling. The valve must be positive in action to eliminate spillage.
The tank filling procedure must follow label recommendations for
product introduction into the hopper, however, as agitation of the
spray solution is limited during filling and “ferrying”, the use of
a pre-mix facility is recommended.
The above point becomes more important in the case of a helicopter
fitted with pannier tanks and an intermittent electric drive pump,
which is only used when actually spraying.
Aircraft payload may need to be reduced to compensate for airstrip
conditions or the effect of atmospheric conditions on engine performance,
which in turn will determine how much spray liquid, can be loaded.
4.1.7 Prior warnings
Members of the public, not directly involved with the spray operation,
may also be affected by an aerial pesticide application so the contractor/farmer
may have a mandatory obligation to issue “prior warnings” to any person
or organisation that might be affected or concerned.
Warnings must be given in ample time to beekeepers, owners of adjacent
crops, livestock owners and those responsible for nearby environmentally
sensitive sites. Where particularly toxic materials are to be used,
it may be necessary to warn the emergency services, and the local
environment and water authorities. The product label should give precise
advice on prior warning and who to contact.
4.2 Field application
Adequate pre-preparation will make sure that the actual spraying
is carried out under the safest conditions and accurate spray timing
will help ensure that the product is used to optimum effect. Employers
and operators must make sure that all safety equipment, clothing and
aircraft loading equipment is clean and in a good state of repair.
4.2.1 Field survey
The possible environmental effect of the selected product will have
already been considered when the decision to use it is made. The pilot
accepts the responsibility for treating a particular field and the
decision to spray will be made following a preliminary inspection
flight to note boundary locations and determine the method of ground
marking. The pilot will also note the position of trees, overhead
wires, habitations, waterways, livestock which might be frightened
by low flying aircraft, and field undulations, which may affect aircraft
performance and the number and position of the flagmen required. Adjacent
crops must be noted and roads and railways observed, particularly
where they are raised on embankments, which may restrict aircraft
manoeuvring.
Spray pilots must observe national legislation regarding the dimension
of mandatory “no-spray” (buffer) boundaries. The product label will
stipulate the buffer widths where appropriate.
In some countries organisations are available to advise on field
headland and boundary management and they can assist with local environmental
risk assessment when a pesticide is to be used.
4.2.2 Meteorological considerations
Spray deposit efficiency is greatly influenced by local meteorological
conditions at crop height. Wind velocity and direction, temperature,
relative humidity and the likelihood of rain all influence spray deposit.
The distance a spray droplet travels depends on the droplet size and
downward velocity, the release height and the ambient conditions.
Vortices created by the aircraft passage will also influence spray
distribution efficiency.
Wind
Aircraft spraying is normally carried out when the surface wind speed
is less than 6-7m/s, which is a safe speed for aircraft handling and
safety. However, in areas of exceptional turbulence the above figures
may have to be reduced. Reference to local rules and guidelines may
indicate the cut-off wind speed for aerial spraying, however, it is
inadvisable to spray when wind speeds exceed 8m/s under most circumstances.
Wind speed and direction will also influence flying height. When the
wind speed is less than 3m/s, a boom height of between 3 and 4 m above
the crop will ensure good lateral movement of the spray but flying
height must be reduced if the wind speed exceeds 3m/s.
Spraying must be carried out taking into account the crosswind to
ensure that the flying speed and the application rate remain the same
for both flight directions. The distance that the spray moves will
vary according to wind strength and aircraft altitude.
Temperature
In conventional (water-based) spraying, high temperature, combined
with low relative humidity will reduce droplet size through evaporation,
which will increase the risk of drift. As temperature increases so
atmospheric turbulence rises. Spraying must not be carried out where
there is upward air movement or where a temperature inversion prevents
the spray cloud settling within the treated area.
For ULV spraying, conditions of mild turbulence, similar to those
recommended for conventional spraying, are preferable.
The relative humidity can be calculated from tables, by determining
the difference between the wet and dry bulb thermometers (hygrometer).
When the difference between the wet and dry bulbs exceeds 8°,
aqueous spray suspensions should not be sprayed.
4.2.3 Treatment timing
The optimum timing to spray will depend on the pest, weed and disease
development stages. Treatment timing will also be governed by meteorological
conditions, which may affect losses from drift and from volatile spray.
Temperature, relative humidity, wind direction, wind velocity and
rainfall can all influence spray deposit efficiency. The product label
will indicate the period of time the treatment can be applied before
rain and may also indicate the required dose rates for top-up application
if the original spray is diluted by unexpected rain shortly after
spraying.
If application timing is accurate, fewer spray treatments may be needed.
The use of suitable computer modelling to predict spray timing may
help to reduce the number of treatments required and accurate pest
forecasting can be useful.
The time of day a treatment is applied can be important. The optimum
spray timing for efficacy may coincide with the foraging time of beneficial
insects. It is therefore important to know and understand crop, insect
and disease development and the status of beneficial organisms to
determine when to spray. An understanding of product mode of action
in relation to crop development will also be advantageous.
4.2.4 Airstrip operation
The site should be as close as possible to the work area and must
have good vehicle access. Aviation fuel and pesticide must not be
stored together and the latter should be shaded from direct sunlight.
A hard apron for loading and washing down aircraft is preferable for
permanent airstrips where spills and washings should be retained and
drained into a holding tank for processing.
Emergency and first aid equipment must be kept in good condition
and clearly marked and sited. Facilities for washing and for storing
PPE must also be available.
Operator and environment contamination may be reduced if products
are handled and loaded using closed-transfer systems working with
returnable containers (see 3.4 and 3.5).
When spraying with aqueous solutions the aircraft hopper should be
half filled with water before adding the formulation. As spray tank
agitation is usually limited, wettable powders must be pre-mixed before
loading. The use of a separate, ground-based mixing tank will speed
up the transfer operation and enable the spray mixture to be fully
agitated before loading.
Pilots should not be in contact with the pesticide during the loading
the pesticide solution into the aircraft, which is the responsibility
of the ground staff who should be familiar with the products they
are handling and the accident procedures in the event of a spill or
a contamination incident. The ground staff members are also responsible
for cleaning up any spills onto the aircraft itself during filling
and for keeping the cockpit windscreen splash free and clean.
4.2.5 Field operation
Local regulations relating to aircraft operation must always be strictly
followed.
Field staff members are responsible for on-the-ground site management.
Field marking is carried out following a reconnaissance flight made
by the pilot prior to the operation commencing. Swath matching (lane
separation) can be effected by various methods. The use of natural
markers provide an inexpensive marking system but fixed markers can
only be considered if the crop is to be treated many times and the
wind direction remains consistent. Balloons and kytoons have been
used to mark aircraft passes over tall crops but the most common method
of field marking is still human flagmen, who must be fully protected
at all times and remain visible to the pilot during the spray operation.
To reduce contact with the spray cloud flagmen must be positioned
at least 100m away from the field edge and should move upwind when
the aircraft comes out of the turn and levels in preparation for the
spray run. The distance between spray runs should be measured, using
a fixed length of rope. Wherever possible, the use of a GPS system
is strongly recommended to eliminate the use of human flagmen. Field
staff should never enter the treated area
Accurate aerial spraying over undulating rangelands and forest tracts
is more difficult to achieve than when treating smaller crop areas
and in these circumstances electronic track guidance may be financially
justified. Both the self-contained Inertial Navigation System (INS)
and the Doppler System require no external reference input during
flight, but the size and complexity of these units confines their
use to large aircraft. These systems are not precise enough for smaller-scale
agricultural spraying.
Systems working with external references are also available. Positional
information is received from a series of transmitting stations around
the world, which produce hyperbolic lines of constant phase, which
can be converted onboard into navigational guidance. Such systems
eliminate the need for human flagmen, and constantly monitor and evaluate
the spray process.
4.2.6 Sprayer field settings
During a flight, spray pressure, output and aircraft height above
the crop can be adjusted if necessary however, as the pilot has to
concentrate on flying the aircraft he may only occasionally check
the spraying system.
The use of artificial targets within the treated crop is strongly
recommended to check and evaluate spray deposit efficiency as well
as confirm the lane separation distances. This is where the ground
staff can report back to the pilot, via the radio, any problems with
the spraying system such as blocked nozzles or incorrectly operating
atomisers.
4.2.7 Chemical handling
To help keep sprayer-operator exposure to a minimum, wherever possible
preference must be given to using pesticide packs handled via closed
transfer systems.
Handling and loading chemical products must only be carried out by
fully trained and protected staff. Only approved PPE must be used.
Absorbent material to contain chemical spills must be available at
the filling site. Chemical stores must be kept secure at all times
and must have a secure section for storing clean, empty chemical containers
prior to their collection for disposal.
4.2.8 Chemical container handling
All operators must be trained to handle chemical containers, remove
seals, measure and weigh dry formulations and pour liquid formulations
and to correctly rinse empty containers.
Where mechanised container rinsing is not available, triple manual
rinsing with clean water will remove chemical residues leaving the
container ready for disposal. (Use 20% of the container volume in
clean water for the three individual rinses). Containers must be rinsed
immediately after use and the washing liquid( rinsate) emptied back
into the spray or mixing tank.
Handling the concentrate material presents the operator with the
highest exposure risk so correct safety equipment and clothing must
be available and operators trained to use and maintain it properly.
Engineering controls, closed transfer systems, returnable containers,
water dispersible sachets etc, should be used where possible.
Chemicals must be stored in their original containers and part-full
product containers must be re-sealed and returned to the store.
EMPTY CONTAINERS MUST NOT BE RE-USED
4.2.9 Post-treatment warnings
Immediately after the spray has been applied warning notices must
be posted around the treated area in accordance with any label recommendations.
Recipients of warnings such as beekeepers can be informed that the
application has been completed. The field notice should inform people
of the treatment and the re-entry period. Notices should be removed
when they are no longer required. Livestock must be kept out of the
treated area for the period stipulated on the product label.
4.3 Post-application
Safety for the operator and the environment remain a prime consideration
after spraying when cleaning or repairing spray and loading equipment.
Such operations may be carried out by aircraft-maintenance staff who
are not familiar with the protection required when handling contaminated
equipment. They must be fully protected when cleaning or repairing
the aircraft or the spray equipment.
Refer to the aircraft and sprayer manufacturer instruction literature
for the correct maintenance procedures. Aircraft maintenance will
be the subject of local Civil Aviation rules but no work should be
started before the equipment has been thoroughly cleaned (“decontaminated”).
4.3.1 Cleaning (“decontamination”) of equipment and PPE
Following spraying, the aircraft and spray equipment must be washed
internally and externally in the field and the rinse liquid sprayed
onto a crop for which the product is registered, making sure that
the recommended dose rate is not exceeded by over-spraying a treated
area. Following a conventional spray application the spraying system
should be rinsed three to four times with small amounts of water rather
than once with a full tank. Particular care must be taken after working
with wettable powders as residues can accumulate in the spray lines
and filter housing.
Oil-based, ULV formulations cannot be washed out with water. An appropriate,
recommended solvent must be used to rinse the spraying system. Tank
washings can be sprayed out onto waste land provided there is no likely
environmental effect, or alternatively can be collected, treated and
incinerated. If cleaning /decontamination is incomplete, product deposits
may build up in un-purged areas or on rotary atomisers throwing them
out of balance. Vegetable oil used as a spray carrier can be fully
removed by washing with water and a detergent solution immediately
after spraying is completed. Complete spray system rinsing and draining
is important as some aircraft plumbing can retain as much as 30 litres
of spray solution or ULV product when they are considered “empty”.
Personal Protective Equipment must be thoroughly cleaned after use,
dried and stored in a well ventilated store away from other materials.
4.3.2 Disposal of surplus spray
Pesticide waste can be divided into surplus diluted spray solution
(see 4.3.1) and surplus concentrate material. Contaminated safety
equipment, protective clothing, cockpit filter elements and material
used to absorb spills all have to be correctly disposed of. Pre-planning
the spray operation should help to ensure that surplus spray solution
is kept to a minimum and only enough product for the area to be treated
is purchased and prepared. This may be difficult where product demand
is high and the objective of the management is to keep aircraft working
when conditions are right. Good stock control will keep surplus concentrates
to a minimum.
In some cases, unused chemicals can be returned to the retailer otherwise
an approved contractor will have to be used to dispose of the unwanted
product. Where this service is used the waste chemicals must be securely
packed and clearly labelled when transported.
Unused dilute spray and tank washings can cause serious problems,
particularly where many aircraft use the same airstrip and many different
chemicals are washed from the aircraft at the end of work periods.
In such cases, installing a dedicated effluent plant to deal with
such washings is likely to be the only practical solution.
4.3.3 Disposal of empty chemical containers
Before final disposal, empty chemical containers must be thoroughly
cleaned (“decontaminated”) either by using an approved rinsing nozzle
or by the triple manual rinse technique (see 4.2.8). Wherever possible,
the rinsing must be done immediately after the containers are emptied
so that the washings can be added to the spray tank in the field.
When this is not possible, the rinse water can be collected, clearly
labelled and stored for future use as a spray diluent when the same
product is used again.
Empty containers must be securely stored before disposal by an officially
approved method.
Countries differ in their legislation on container disposal, which
may include burial, (incineration) or removal by a specialist, registered
contractor. Empty chemical containers must be thoroughly cleaned (“decontaminated”)
and punctured or crushed before burial. The burial site must not be
near surface or ground water. Soil type and natural drainage must
be taken into consideration when selecting a burial site and the location,
and the pesticide products originally stored in the buried containers
must be recorded.
Even where legislation permits, not all containers should be incinerated.
The product label will indicate whether the container was used to
store a flammable product or was an aerosol. Containers must be thoroughly
cleaned (“decontaminated”) before incinerating. Incinerating containers
may present a further hazard if smoke drifts over roadways or becomes
an inconvenience. A simple incinerator based on a 200 l steel drum
has been designed, which generates substantial heat, while producing
little smoke.
4.3.4 Equipment maintenance and repair
When spraying has been completed, equipment must be prepared for
storage. Both inside the spray hopper and the outer surfaces of the
aircraft must be thoroughly washed and the liquid spray system fully
rinsed through to ensure that all piping and hoses are clean. Washing
the aircraft fabric is particularly important to avoid damage to the
aircraft components. All the surfaces of the aircraft controls must
be cleaned and lubricated as appropriate.
The spraying system should be operated at a higher than the normal
operating pressure to fully test the system to indicate leaks from
worn or damaged hoses and or component parts. Pump drive systems,
electrical, hydraulic or ancillary engine, must be maintained in accordance
with the manufacturer’s instructions and the spray circuit pipe system
fully drained before storage.
All hydraulic nozzles should be removed for storage and all check-valve
diaphragms inspected for damage and wear. The spray pressure gauge
must be checked at zero when the spraying system is not in use.
Rotary atomisers must be thoroughly cleaned and cages checked for
damage and balance. Seals must be inspected and spring-loaded working
parts (cut-off valves/liquid restrictor valves) must be working correctly.
Brakes used to stop the spray pump and atomisers rotating during ferrying
must be clean and free from contamination from oil and grease.
All electrical components of the spraying system should be checked
and couplings sealed for storage when units such as navigation aids
and spray monitoring equipment are removed for storage. When new components
are fitted to the spray system or existing ones repaired, work carried
out must be recorded in the aircraft maintenance log.
4.3.5 Equipment storage
Refer to the relevant operator instruction manuals for both the spray
equipment and the aircraft. Aircraft mounted spray equipment is often
removed after spraying to release the aircraft for other duties. Both
the spray equipment and the aircraft must be thoroughly cleaned (“decontaminated”)
and dried, before being stored. Aircraft storage will depend on local
regulations but the aircraft should be stored under cover and be fully
secure.
4.3.6 Pesticide storage
Unused pesticide must be returned to store. Distressed or damaged
containers must be emptied into clean replacement containers, which
are fully labelled. Store stock control must ensure that existing
chemicals are used first before recently purchased similar new products.
Refer to the International Code of Conduct on the Distribution and
Use of Pesticides, FAO, 1989.
Good stock control and accurate planning will mean that waste concentrate
and diluted spray are kept to a minimum. However, where old or obsolete
chemical products have to be disposed of, an approved contractor must
be used. Chemicals for disposal must be secure in their original containers
wherever possible and fully labelled.
5. RECORDINGS
Keeping records of pesticide use and application is good management.
Good records can be referred to in the event of off-target contamination
or if a complaint arises from poor field performance. Records can
assist pesticide stock control as well as provide a useful reference
guide to product performance for future decision making.
Where record keeping is mandatory, local enforcement officers are
empowered to refer to records, sometimes up to three years after the
actual application has been completed. Where operator health monitoring
is mandatory, the records may have to be retained for considerably
longer. Records should cover both details of the actual application
and any operator health observations carried out.
Aircraft use and maintenance recording should be carried out, usually
in accordance with the local Civil Aviation Authority and the appropriate
department of the Ministry of Agriculture and or other relevant ministry.
5.1 Field spray records
An accurate and comprehensive recording system must cover all relevant
information and be simple to complete. An investigation into unsatisfactory
product performance or an off-target contamination incident will begin
with a check on the job-card or work sheet, which should be completed
on the day of application. The job-card should include the following
information:
|
Field number, size and location (map reference)
|
Hectares sprayed
|
|
Target pest and growth stage
|
Total amount of product used
|
|
Application date and time
|
Adjacent crops
|
|
Crop, growth stage
|
Tank-mix information
|
|
Product and dose rate
|
Adjuvants used
|
|
Water volume used
|
Pilots name
|
|
Aircraft type and registration
|
Start and finish time
|
|
"No-spray" barrier information
|
Field marking method
|
|
Meteorological conditions at application
|
Aircraft loading information
|
|
Lost time information
|
Operator exposure times
|
|
PPE used and operator monitoring
|
|
5.2 Equipment repairs and maintenance
Repairs to spray equipment must be logged and changes in spray technique
and calibration during the season must be listed for future reference.
Information on aircraft maintenance should be recorded in accordance
with the local Civil Aviation Authority requirements.
Repairs to spray equipment repairs must be promptly carried out following
which the aircraft must be re-calibrated and the swath width re-checked.
This is normally required to comply with local legislation.
Spare nozzles, anti-drip diaphragms, atomiser blades, valve springs
etc, should all be kept in stock throughout the spraying season.
5.3 Operator health surveillance
Where label recommendations demand operator health surveillance,
a separate record must be prepared for each individual operator to
cover name health details and previous health history.
Exposure periods must be listed to include the date of the initial
exposure to a particular product, together with any recommendations
coming from the clinical practitioner responsible for the monitoring
programme. Operator contact with other chemical products during the
monitoring period must also be recorded.
All staff involved with the spray operation should be submitted for
health checks on a regular basis.
5.4 Personal protective equipment
PPE is only as good as its use and maintenance and must be provided
and used on a strictly individual basis. To make sure that safety
equipment gives maximum protection, operator training is important.
Wearing protective clothing does not guarantee operator protection.
When chemical loading or handling equipment becomes defective through
wear or damage regular visual checks must be carried out. Specialist
equipment such as respirators must be checked according to the manufacturer’s
recommendation. Checks must be more frequent when working conditions
are severe. Faults must be recorded and corrected before further use.
5.5 Local emergency contacts
In the event of an aircraft accident, chemical spillage or an environmental
contamination incident, an accessible list of local emergency contacts
must be available to cover appropriate medical facilities with access
to poisons information. The local chemical product manufacturer and
or supplier must be listed as a source of up to date product information
and accident procedure. Contacts, such as the local civil aviation
authority, water authority, environmental and pollution control agency
and the emergency services should all be listed, and a trained local
first-aid practitioner appointed. The first-aid worker should be conversant
with the chemical products in use and the emergency procedures in
the event of an accident. He/she must have up-to-date product label
information and access to a good supply of appropriate antidotes for
the products in use. Pesticide poisonings are usually acute resulting
from dermal contact (see 3.6). It is therefore essential that first-aid
workers can recognise the different poisoning symptoms for the products
in current use. Symptoms vary for different chemical products and
may be mistaken for other illnesses, notably those resulting from
heat exposure.
6. ANNEXES
6.1 References
1. Guidelines on organization and operation of training schemes and
certification procedures for operators of pesticide application equipment,
FAO Rome 2001.
2. Guidelines on procedures for the registration, certification and
testing of new pesticide application equipment, FAO Rome 2001.
3. Guidelines on the organization of schemes for testing and certification
of spray equipment in use, FAO Rome 2001.
4. Guidelines on good practice for ground application of pesticides,
FAO Rome 2001.
5. Guidelines on minimum requirements for agricultural pesticide application
equipment, FAO Rome 2001.
6. Guidelines on standards for agricultural pesticide sprayers and
related test procedures, FAO Rome 2001.
7. International Code of Conduct on the Distribution and Use of Pesticides
(Amended version), FAO Rome 2001.
8. Guidelines for Personal Protection when working pesticides in Tropical
Countries FAO, Rome 1990.
9. Legislation on the Control of Pesticides, FAO, Rome 1990.
10. Guidelines on Good Labeling Practice for Pesticides, FAO Rome
1995.
11. Pesticide Storage and stock control manual, FAO Pesticide disposal
series 3, Rome 1996.
12. The WHO recommended Classification of Pesticides by Hazard and
guidelines to Classification 1996-1997.
13. Pesticide Application Equipment for Agriculture, Volume 1 Manually
carried Equipment, Volume 2 Mechanically powered equipment, FAO Agricultural
Services Bulletin 112, FAO Rome.
6.2 Local emergency contacts
1. Emergency medical assistance: Doctor, Health Centre and Hospital
2. Local manufacturers and suppliers of pesticide
3. Environmental and pollution control agency
4. Water authority
5. Emergency fire authority
6. Local authority, Aviation Authority, Police and Highway Control
7. Health and Safety authority
8. Approved waste disposal contractor
|