Back to table of contents

Development of Forage Technologies with
Farmers in East Kalimantan, Indonesia

Ibrahim, Heriyanto, Tugiman
Forages for smallholders Project (FSP) funded by ADB
Livestock Services East Kalimantan Province, Indonesia

ABSTRACT

Farmer participatory approach to forage technology development was used in Makroman and Sepaku II, East Kalimantan, Indonesia.  Initially (1995), there were 58 and 82 farmers involved in Makroman and Sepaku II, respectively.  Farmers were involved in all stages of the development process from participatory diagnosis, planning, test of species and evaluation.  There were 19 different forage species tested, 9 of which are planted in both sites.  Majority of the farmers in these two sites have expanded their forage area.  Some farmers and farmer groups have sold planting materials to other villages.

INTRODUCTION

The success in livestock production is influenced by many factors.  These are: management system, forage for feeding and access to market.  The cost of production in livestock raising is dominated by feeding cost which is estimated at 60% of the total cost.  Therefore, there is a need to find ways on how to reduce feed cost.  Forage as cattle feed is important.  It is cheaper, easy to manage and palatable. Most farming systems have livestock either ruminant or non-ruminant which are raised in traditional system. 

Livestock is closely associated with cropping system.  The integration of crops  and  animals in  the system  is   the main avenue for increasing animal production with residues from crops used for feeding. Cultivation of forages is a new concept for smallhold farmers in East Kalimantan.  Traditionally feed resources for ruminants are readily available and obtained from native vegetation.

Introduction of forages is a new technology for farmers raising livestock in East Kalimantan and this was done using the participatory technology development approach. Participatory technology development (PTD) is a broad concept referring to development approaches focused on active farmerparticipation or involvement of the community in all stages of the development process such as prioritizing problems, identifying possible solutions up to test experimentation and evaluation.

METHODOLOGY

In selecting communities and farmer for on-farm agricultural technology development, the following key questions are asked:

  1. Is there a genuine problem?
  2. Are there committed local individuals who can work with farmers to solve the problem?
  3. Do farmers think that the problem is important enough?
  4. Are there many others with the same problem?
  5. Do we have the potential solutions with substantial benefits?
  6. Are there farmers already trying to solve the problem?
  7. Is there a local enthusiastic individual who would champion the resulting technologies in the future?
Areas where forages appeared to have potential were identified.  This was confirmed through a village meeting and the village people diagnosed and prioritized the problems they experience in their farming and livestock raising.  The following are common steps in the diagnosis:

a. Familiarization
Development workers are allowed to familiarize with the landscape and farming systems in the area and get some ideas on opportunities and limitation by having a village walk.

b. Resource inventories
Farmers described their village resources through mapping, seasonal calendars and historical dates.  It did not only serve as basis for discussion on problems in the farming system but it also broke the communication barriers in the participatory process that is totally strange to the farmers.

c. Problem identification
With the use of cards farmers write their problems and identified the major constraints they face in agriculture and livestock raising.

d. Problem analysis
The community identifies causal linkages between problems

e. Current management of problems
The community describes how they deal with the problems.  This does not only prioritized their problems but also  identifies innovative and motivated farmers who have been active in trying to solve these problems.

f. Prioritization of problems
Farmers prioritize the problems and identify which one they want to solve.

g. Agreement on a plan of action
Agreement on a plan of action between the development workers and the community is used to evaluate the range of technology options that have a potential to solve priority problems.

Individual farmers or farmer groups would begin planting and evaluating forage varieties, many of which had been selected based on on-station research outcome.  These farmers were encouraged to plant forages wherever and whatever way although the development workers collaborate with the FSP project and provide some suggestion and information on forage establishment and management.  These development workers follow-up through participatory evaluation which forage varieties they prefer and reason for their preference.  Follow-up on individual farmers who are willing to plant forages is very important to support on-farm development in all sites.

Strategy for scaling-up
Strategy for scaling-up/out will be started in farmer group and individual farmer in the village.  Each village consists of 2 to 4 farmer groups.  For scaling-up, from the focus site will be developed in the village or to other village in the same district.

The dissemination of information will run sporadically depending on the willingness of the farmers.  Extension workers will facilitate the distribution of planting materials and farmers’ meeting and field day or cross visits.

Multiplication systems will be farms that become small scale commercial enterprises producing seeds and the vegetative multiplication system of grasses managed by groups of individuals.

RESULTS

The participatory research in forage technology development was conducted in Makroman and Sepaku II, East Kalimantan with different soil conditions (Table 1). 

Initially (1995) there were 58 farmers involved in Makroman and 82 in Sepaku with 4 and 3 farmer groups, respectively.  A total of nineteen forage species were planted, nine of which were planted in both sites Table 2). 

As of 1999, 50 out of the 58 and 70 out of the 82 farmers in the sites expanded their forage areas.  Some farmer groups and individual farmers in the 2 sites have sold vegetative planting materials of grasses to the other villages.  In year 2001 the project has included 2
municipalities, 6 districts, 19 villages, with 26 farmer groups.  About 450 farmers have evaluated forages.

Table 1. The sites for participatory research in forage technology development, East Kalimantan.

 

Makroman

Sepaku II

Rainfall (mm/year)

2200

2600

Soil Type

Red loam

Silty loam

Soil pH

4.6 (65% Al)

4.8 (65% Al)

Fertility

Moderate (Low S)

Moderate (Low P)

Climate

7-11 wet months

7-11 wet months

Farming System

Low land rice and upland crops

Low land rice and upland crops

 

Crops;  corn, cassava, sweet potato, vegetables

Crops;  corn, cassava, sweet potato, vegetables

 

Animals: beef cattle, goats and native chicken

Animals: beef cattle, goats and native chicken

 

Table 2. The species planted by farmers in the 2 sites.

              Makroman

               Sepaku II

Paspalum atratum BRA 9610

B. brizantha CIAT 6780

B. brizantha CIAT 6780

B. decumbens cv Basilisk

B. humidicola cv Tully

B. humidicola cv Tully

B. humidicola CIAT 6133

B. dictyneura CIAT 6133

Andropogon gayanus CIAT 621

Andropogon gayanus CIAT 621

Setaria sphacelata var Splendida

Panicum maximum cv Mott

Pennisetum purpureum cv Mott

Pennisetum purpureum hybrid

B. humidicola CIAT 6369

Setaria sphacelata var Splendida

Centrosema pubescens CIAT 15160

Centrosema pubescens CIAT 15160

Stylosanthes guianensis CIAT 184

Stylosanthes guianensis CIAT 184

Arachis pintoi cv Amarillo

Arachis pintoi cv Amarillo

Gliricidia sepium

Gliricidia sepium cv Retalhuleu

Calliandra, Sesbania grandiflora

 

Luecaena leucocephala

 

Flemengia macrophylla

 

Paspalum atratum BRA 9610