Abstract
Fodder
crops occupy from 16 to 19 percent of the total cropped area in Pakistan.
In 1999-2000, both the winter and summer fodder crops were grown on 2.556
million hectares yielding 58.414 million tons of fodder. Single cut and
multicut varieties of various fodder crops have been evaluated to improve
the fodder productivity. Single cut sorghum varieties No.1863, S-9706
and Local Quetta produced better fodder yields than the check variety
Hegari. In case of millet and oats cv. NARC-5 and No.725, respectively
performed better in fodder production. Among multicut fodder crops, berseem
variety Pachaiti, oats cv. S-81 and PD2-LV65, and lucerne cv. Sundar and
Type 8/9 gave better performance. Other multicut fodder crops like Sorghum
Sudan
grass hybrid, elephant grass cv. Mott and Bajra Napier grass Hybrid produced
good fodder yields when harvested at 8 weeks interval. Mix cropping of
legume in cereal fodder is a good option to increase the quality of cereal
fodder. A sowing ratio of 50:50 (Oat: Vetch) mix cropping and 50 kg nitrogen
is recommended for farmer to get better fodder yield and quality. More
than double fodder yields have been obtained under improved fodder production
technology compared to farmer production technology. As a result of research
and extension, 38 varieties of various fodder crops have been released
for general cultivation in various parts of the country.
Introduction
In
Pakistan major fodder
crops during winter include berseem, lucerne, oats, barley and mustard;
while during summer these comprise maize, sorghum and millets. These crops
cover from 16 to 19 percent of the total cropped area in the country.
Over time, the area remained more or less stagnant, but the fodder production
and yield of these crops have increased, due to research and development
efforts undertaken by the national research system. The area with minor
fluctuations decreased from 2603 thousand hectares in 1976-77 to 2556
thousand hectares in 1999-2000. However total fodder production in the
corresponding years increased from 45097 thousand tons to 58414 thousand
tons. Similarly fodder yield per unit area also increased from 17 to 23
t/ha i.e. about 31 percent increase as a result of the concerted research
and development efforts made by the fodder research scientists through
the development of improved production technology.
Problems
for Low Fodder Yield
- Improved seed production is the major problem for low fodder yields.
- Practically no work is being done on the improvement of fodder crops
except in the Punjab province where the Fodder Section needs further
strengthening.
- There is continuous shift of scientific staff from other disciplines
to fodder and from fodder to other disciplines.
- Lack of training for research staff within the country and abroad.
- No additional land is available with the Fodder Section for the production
of even sufficient nucleus seed of important high yielding varieties
of fodder.
Solutions
to Increase Fodder Yields
- To solve the improved fodder seed production problem, an organized
seed production, multiplication, processing, storing and dissemination
programme must be developed on a scientific basis. The entire area under
Government Livestock Farms is put under fodders with emphasis on the
production of seeds and other propagation materials.
- Lucerne cultivation should be popularized, as its water requirement
is less and it provides nutritious fodder throughout the year. Bajra
Napier Grass Hybrid and Sorghum Sudan Grass Hybrids possess great potential
of yielding high tonnage of green palatable fodder and its cultivation
should be encouraged. Ample quantity of hybrids seed should be produced
and supplied to farmers. Fertilizer application in fodder crops should
also be encouraged to enhance fodder production.
- There is dire need for initiating intensified research on fodder crops
in each province. The staff should not be transferred too often from
fodder to other and from other to fodder disciplines.
- Special courses in the Agricultural Universities in the country should
be arranged with special reference to fodders.
- In-service training abroad should be given priority in the field of
fodder crops research and extension.
Approaches
to improve fodder production
There
are two major approaches, horizontal and vertical improvements, to increase
fodder production. In the first approach, increasing the area can increase
the production of fodder. It is not possible, as the country is already
facing hardship in feeding the human population that is increasing at
the rate of about 3% per annum. Thus, the only way left is the second
type of improvement, which means per hectare increase of fodder production.
The developments/improvement in various fodder crops to increase fodder
production per unit area are narrated in the following Tables 1-3.
Table 1:
Average green fodder and dry matter yields (t/ha) of sorghum varieties
at different locations in Pakistan
| Varieties |
Locations |
| |
Islamabad |
Sargodha |
Tandojam |
Average |
| |
GY |
DY |
GY |
DY |
GY |
DY |
GY |
DY |
| JS-88 |
40.74 |
13.12 |
64.35 |
20.72 |
59.26 |
19.08 |
55.00 |
17.64 |
| S-0603 |
43.05 |
13.86 |
64.35 |
20.61 |
64.81 |
20.87 |
57.40 |
18.45 |
| S-9706 |
51.85 |
16.70 |
65.28 |
21.02 |
62.50 |
20.13 |
59.88 |
19.28 |
| Local
Quetta |
31.48 |
10.14 |
47.70 |
15.36 |
67.13 |
21.58 |
48.77 |
15.69 |
| PARC-SS-1 |
45.83 |
14.76 |
49.07 |
15.78 |
55.55 |
17.31 |
50.15 |
15.95 |
| Local
T.Jam |
36.11 |
11.63 |
59.72 |
19.23 |
62.50 |
19.33 |
52.78 |
16.73 |
| No.
1863 |
52.31 |
16.76 |
59.26 |
19.08 |
55.55 |
17.71 |
55.71 |
17.85 |
| Hegari
(check) |
43.51 |
14.01 |
64.35 |
21.03 |
43.98 |
14.16 |
50.61 |
16.40 |
| Average |
43.00 |
13.94 |
57.45 |
18.52 |
59.16 |
18.93 |
|
|
GY and DY denote green fodder yield and dry matter yield,
respectively.
Table 2: Average
green fodder and dry matter yields (t/ha) of millet varieties at different
locations in Pakistan
| Varieties |
Locations |
| |
Islamabad |
Saragodha |
Tandojam |
Average |
| |
GY |
DY |
GY |
DY |
GY |
DY |
GY |
DY |
| Narc-1 |
56.48 |
18.07 |
54.17 |
13.51 |
31.02 |
07.35 |
47.22 |
13.13 |
| Exb (D2) Bulk |
59.26 |
18.96 |
53.70 |
12.86 |
44.91 |
11.02 |
52.62 |
21.42 |
| NARC-5 |
62.04 |
19.85 |
45.37 |
11.24 |
54.63 |
13.18 |
54.01 |
13.75 |
| Local T.Jam |
40.74 |
13.03 |
52.78 |
12.92 |
47.22 |
11.86 |
46.91 |
12.60 |
| Tift-383 |
50.92 |
16.29 |
53.24 |
13.10 |
49.99 |
12.15 |
51.38 |
13.85 |
| DBR-III |
59.26 |
18.96 |
60.18 |
14.87 |
32.87 |
08.27 |
50.77 |
14.03 |
| Local (check) |
38.89 |
12.44 |
52.78 |
13.02 |
44.91 |
11.34 |
45.53 |
12.27 |
| Average |
52.78 |
16.88 |
53.18 |
13.12 |
43.23 |
10.69 |
|
|
GY and DY denote
green fodder yield and dry matter yield, respectively.
Table 3: Green fodder
yields (t/ha), dry matter yields (t/ha) and crude protein contents (%)
of various oats varieties.
| Varieties |
GFY |
DMY* |
CP |
| S-81 |
75.06 |
8.98 |
10.94 |
| PD2-LV65 |
82.83 |
12.08 |
10.06 |
| Avon(check) |
68.67 |
9.26 |
9.65 |
| NO.656 |
70.97 |
9.53 |
12.44 |
| NO.681 |
71.45 |
9.41 |
12.24 |
| NO.725 |
81.32 |
11.84 |
11.66 |
| SS-1 |
71.30 |
9.83 |
10.21 |
| S-141 |
71.14 |
10.68 |
10.33 |
| NO.707 |
67.44 |
9.67 |
10.09 |
|
| LSD (0.01) |
8.55 |
2.05 |
0.62 |
| *Oven
dried yield |
| GFY,
DMY and CP denote green fodder yield, dry matter yield and crude protein
contents, respectively. |
Comparative
green fodder yield trials on various multi-cut fodders
To
assess the fodder production potential of various multi-cut fodder crops,
experiments on cereal and legume multi-cut fodder crops have been undertaken
at different locations of the country. The green fodder yields obtained
are tabulated in Tables 4-7.
Table 4: Average
green fodder and dry matter yields (t/ha) of various berseem varieties
atFodder Research Institute, Sargodha (Total of 4 cuttings)
| Varieties |
Green Fodder |
Dry Matter |
| Pachaiti |
98.18 |
20.32 |
| Agaiti |
97.62 |
19.52 |
| Composite-84 |
97.70 |
19.00 |
| Saidi |
93.93 |
18.35 |
| Peshawari (check) |
89.52 |
17.54 |
| Misri |
91.43 |
18.08 |
Table 5: Dry matter
yields (t/ha) of various oats varieties under two cut system at the National
Agricultural Research Centre, Islamabad
| Varieties |
Dry
matter yields* |
| |
1st
Cut |
2ndCut |
Total |
| PD2-LV65 |
5.80 |
20.71 |
26.51 |
| S-81 |
5.90 |
21.60 |
27.50 |
| Swan |
5.23 |
7.80 |
23.03 |
| DN-8 |
5.18 |
17.90 |
23.08 |
| Kent |
4.63 |
16.50 |
21.13 |
| Golden Rein |
5.10 |
15.50 |
20.60 |
| Avon |
3.94 |
17.63 |
21.57 |
*Sun
dried yields; 1ST cut, 70 days after sowing; and 2ND
cut, at 50% flowering stage |
Table
6: Green fodder yields (t/ha) of various multi-cut fodder crops/hybrids
at various cutting intervals at Livestock Production Research Institute,
Okara in Punjab.
Cutting
Interval Green Fodder
Yield
S.S.Hybrid
Mott Grass B.N.Hybrid
4 weeks 84.28
88.84 110.67
6 weeks 104.29
112.21 121.71
8 weeks 164.02
164.30 167.76
10 weeks 100.52
123.88 147.77
12 weeks 112.63
159.89 169.30
Average
113.15 129.82 143.44
Table
7: Green fodders and dry matter yield (t/ha) of various Lucerne varieties
at Agricultural Research Institute, Sariab, Quetta (Total of 7 cuttings).
Varieties Green fodder
Dry matter
040
58.73 10.75
042
55.31 10.50
044
60.46 10.15
046
59.53 10.25
048
57.99 9.75
050
61.71 10.85
Sundar
69.85 11.85
Type 8/9 (Check) 69.90
11.00
Mixed Cropping
Different
cereal fodders like millet, sorghum, maize, oats and sudan grass etc. contain
average crude protein contents of 8.20, 5.90, 6.70, 6.55 and 5.72 percent,
respectively. On the other hand, different leguminous fodder crops like
berseem, vetch, cowpeas, cluster bean, lucerne, moth bean and Indian clover
are the best sources of nutritious fodder and contain 16.90, 15.65, 17.50,
16.65, 17.80, 15.22 and 19.12 percent crude protein contents, respectively.
So, mixed cropping of legume in cereal fodder is a good option to increase
the quality of cereal fodder. Average green fodder and dry matter yields
of oats and vetch grown in various sowing mixtures under + nitrogen
fertilizer are given in Table 8. The results of summer cereal fodders
+ legume mix cropping are presented in Table 9.
Table 8: Green fodder and dry matter yields (t/ha) of oats and vetch
grown alone and at various sowing ratio and under + Nitrogen
fertilizer.
Treatments
GFY DMY*
- Nitrogen
Vetch
alone 29.40 c 6.05
c
Oat+Vetch
(25-75) 37.00 b
8.50 b
Oat+Vetch
(50-50) 36.80 b
8.42 b
Oat+Vetch
(75-25) 35.77 b
7.93 b
Oat
alone (100-00) 29.20 c 7.56
b
+ Nitrogen
Vetch
alone 29.23 c 05.86
c
Oat+Vetch
(25-75) 45.47 a 10.27
a
Oat+Vetch
(50-50) 47.17 a 10.97
a
Oat+Vetch
(75-25) 47.90 a 11.03
a
Oat
alone (100-00) 44.30 a
10.33 a
*
Oven dried yields
Means
followed by the same letters do not differ significantly at the 5% level
Table
9: Green fodder and dry matter yield (t/ha) of cowpeas grown in mixture
with summer cereal fodders at National Agricultural Research Centre,
Islamabad
Treatments Green
fodder Dry matter
Maize
alone 36.57
8.50
Maize
+ cowpeas 36.50
8.00
Sorghum
alone
38.57
8.86
Sorghum
+ cowpeas 36.91
8.35
Millet
alone 32.20
7.43
Millet
+ cowpeas 32.57
7.60
Nutritive Values
of Fodder Crops
As
forage yield alone is not enough for measuring the feeding values of the
fodder crops, the palatability and nutritive values were determined in
various fodder crops. Dry matter yield, crude protein contents and crude
fibre contents of the fodder crops are presented in Table 10.
Table
10: Dry matter yield, crude protein contents and crude fibre contents
of various fodder crops
Crop DM (t/ha)
CP (%) CF (%)
Berseem
8.05 16.90 20.00
Lucerne 10.00
21.50 20.41
Oats
11.84 6.55 27.07
Barley
12.95 8.20 24.16
Millet
11.05 8.20 32.05
Sorghum
14.00 5.50 28.05
Sudan grass
10.00 5.72 30.00
Maize
20.48 6.70 35.27
S.
S. Hybrid 22.61
9.66 32.38
Cowpeas
05.92 17.50 24.53
B.
N. Hybrid 51.30
9.35 30.50
Elephant grass 30.00
9.70 33.00
Mott grass 50.00
10.50 35.00
Sesbania 30.00
17.32 25.67
Development/Release
of Fodder Varieties/Hybrids
A
number of improved varieties/hybrids with fodder production potential
higher than the old varieties have been developed/released for general
cultivation both in the winter and summer seasons. Fodder crops varieties
evolved by various institutions (both public and private) engaged in fodder
crops research and development in Pakistan
are given in Table 11.
Table 11: Fodder crops varieties evolved at various research institutes
in Pakistan
Crops
No. of varieties evolved
Oats
9
Barley
3
Berseem
3
Vetch
1
Maize
5
Millet
4
Sorghum
8
Sadabahar
3
Traditional vs
Improved Fodder Production Technology
The
national average yield of fodder in Pakistan was 17.4 t/ha
in 1976-77 and 22.8 t/ha in 1999-2000. No doubt, quality seed of improved
fodder varieties and production technology is available but the fodder
growers do not practice these. Hence, there is a big gap between the fodder
yields obtained by the traditional farmers and those using the improved
practices. The comparison of green fodder yield under traditional and
improved production technologies is presented in Table 12.
Table 12: Comparison
of green fodder yields (t/ha) under traditional (farmer's) and improved
(research station) production technology.
| Fodder
Crop |
Traditional
Technology |
Improved Technology |
Improved Varieties |
| Berseem |
54.83 |
123.50 |
Agaiti berseem,
Pachaiti berseem, Synthetic 1/79, Composite-84 |
| Lucerne |
38.28 |
84.45 |
Type 8/9, Synthetic, Sundar |
| Oats |
34.58 |
80.00 |
S-81, PD2-LV65,
Anon, NARC-1, NARC-2, S-2000, Swan. |
| Sorghum |
30.87 |
64.22 |
No. 94, No. 132, BR-319, Hegari, Indian-III. |
| Maize |
27.66 |
49.04 |
Afgoi, Neelum, Akbar, Gauhar |
| Millet |
28.65 |
61.75 |
Synthetic 1/79, DB-2, C-47, 18-BY |
| Cowpea |
17.29 |
30.87 |
P-76, P-518, Australian, P-259 |
| B.N. Hybrid |
59.28 |
152.15 |
No. 13, Mulayam |
| S.S. Hybrid |
58.53 |
147.00 |
Pak-Sudax, SSG-988, Non-sweet Sadabahar |
| Elephant grass |
39.52 |
79.04 |
A-146, Mott |
| Average |
38.94 |
87.40 |
|
Recommendations
-
Provincial
Seed Corporations should go in for increased production of quality
seed of fodder crops.
-
Livestock
farms need to be encouraged for extensive production of quality seed
of fodder crops in collaboration with fodder research institute.
-
Sub-stations
in each division should be established for rapid dissemination/ production
of quality seed and package of improved fodder production technology.
- At
least one research institute should be established in each province
and resources provided for quality research on fodder crops.
- Progressive fodder
growers need to be trained to produce the seed of improved fodder varieties/
hybrids themselves.
|