The government of Burkina Faso estimates
that nearly 85 percent of Burkinabè households rely
upon livestock for some portion of their income. Furthermore,
livestock accounts for approximately 25 percent of the country’s
exports. Socially, livestock provides a way for young adults
to learn the responsibilities of adulthood, a method for family
members to fulfill social obligations, and a means for women
to support their families. Considering its social and economic
significance, livestock must take center stage in efforts
to improve Burkinabè livelihoods.
This brief highlights three potential constraints - weak
livestock producer organizations, poor animal health service
provision, and commercial weaknesses — on the potential
contribution of the livestock sector to improving poor people’s
livelihoods and recommends strategic actions for overcoming
each of them.
Weak Livestock Producer Organizations
Achieving policy change normally requires strong, organized
interest groups to push for change, but Burkina’s poor
livestock producers lack such groups. In rural areas, livestock
associations are not uncommon, but these rural associations
have had little influence on local, regional, and particularly,
national policies. Rural associations tend to focus their
attention on NGO or donor activity with many associations
lasting only as long as the local NGO or donor project. Furthermore,
rural associations tend to avoid any activity that could be
perceived as ‘political’. At the national level,
it is difficult for all-inclusive organizations to generate
a common policy platform from the disparate needs and priorities
of livestock producers in Burkina Faso. The existing Fédération
des Éleveurs de Burkina Faso (FEB) faces strong criticism
for its inability to address the needs of the livestock producers
outside the cattle sub-sector.
Livestock producers in peri-urban professional associations,
such as the Maison de l’Aviculture, have been more successful
at organizing to provide member services and to influence
policy. Actors interested in promoting pro-poor policies can
work with and provide assistance to these associations on
issues that affect all producers in the poultry, pork and
dairy industries. Tariffs and macro-economic policies are
one level at which the interests of rural and peri-urban producers
may coincide. Furthermore, both groups can profit from basic
animal health measures (not advanced veterinary interventions
required to raise exotic breeds), like vaccinations against
Newcastle disease or efforts to stop the spread of African
swine fever. However, peri-urban professional associations
already have exceptional organizational advantages vis-à-vis
their rural counterparts. Although they can promote common
goals and address common needs, they also have very specific
concerns which are not related to those of their poor counterparts.
In addition, actors seeking to help livestock producers should
work with herders unions at the provincial level. These unions
provide important member services to livestock producers,
as well as being active in local and provincial politics,
particularly in politics surrounding land-use. These unions
have been critiqued for their ethnic basis, but it can be
argued that this ethnic basis is necessary to the unions’
organizational survival. Despite problems of inequality within
some herders unions, these unions can provide information,
training, and legal assistance to agro-pastoral producers.
Particularly as Burkina proceeds with political decentralization,
herders unions can help provide agro-pastoralists the resources
needed to make sure they do not lose out as decision-making
roles are delegated to local authorities.
Finally, livestock producers need to be able to use the export
earnings they generate to influence policy. Interested actors
could provide herders unions with research findings on the
fiscal importance of livestock exports to the Burkinabè
state. By helping unions develop the ‘campaigning’
skills needed to educate state officials and politicians on
the fiscal importance of livestock exports, donors or other
interested organizations could help unions raise the political
salience of livestock exports.
Poor Animal Health Provision
Poor producers’ ability to profit from market demand
for livestock, particularly for family-raised poultry which
is arguably an important source of daily revenue for most
poor Burkinabè families, depends on the accessibility
of reasonably priced vaccines and medicines. At present, access
is limited by 1) the lack of private veterinarians in rural
areas, 2) import companies’ inability to supply the
domestic market, and 3) what producers’ perceive as
high costs for medicines and vaccines. Furthermore, the states’
basic animal health capacities appear to be eroding so that
the state is not prepared to deal with epizootic outbreaks.
This brief recommends a threefold approach to addressing the
animal health problem.
First, it recommends that an in-depth study of the constraints
facing import businesses be conducted in order to generate
feasible means for increasing capital and capacity in the
import business. Second, to facilitate the privatization of
veterinary services while retaining basic national animal
health preventative capacities, it recommends that the government
contract private paraprofessionals to provide preventative
services in specified geographical areas under the supervision
of private veterinarians. In exchange for providing preventative
services, these para-professionals could be granted the right
to sell basic curative medicines to local producers in the
area. In exchange for their supervisory role, private veterinarians
could receive trans-portation subsidies that would allow them
to provide curative services at a reduced fee while traveling
for supervision purposes. This contract for curative service
in a given area would help assure veterinarians a sound financial
base for their private practice.
Finally, in order to increase the production of village poultry,
vaccines and basic medicines must be made available to producers
at accessible prices. This brief recommends looking into creating
private partnerships with the Programme de Développement
des Animaux Villageois as a means of securing these resources
at competitive rates.
Commercial Weaknesses
The small-ruminant and cattle sub-sector provides the most
promising source of market growth in the livestock sector.
If expanded, it could significantly improve household livelihoods;
however, this sub-sector cannot expand until the high transaction
and transportation costs of exporting Burkinabè products
to the West African sub-region are addressed. Furthermore,
the sub-sector suffers from lack of capital and access to
formal credit.
Despite strong regional demand for Burkinabè exports,
commercial actors in the sub-sector do not have access to
the capital needed to expand exports. Increasing the capacity
and reliability of the small-ruminant and cattle commercial
system requires that credit be extended to actors at the highest
levels of the formal commercial system. Furthermore, interested
actors should support efforts such as those undertaken by
the West African Monetary Union to reduce unofficial practices,
including demands for bribes, that raise the costs of cross-border
trade in cattle and small-ruminants.
|