FAO Home Page French version Spanish version Waicent Free Text Search
FAO/23068
INFPDE-CONFERENCES

The Bangladesh Model and Other Experiences in Family Poultry Development

Commercializing rearing of village chicken in Kenya

Thomas Junne Kaudia and Aichi Kitalyi

A field study on the status of village chicken was carried out in Nyando district in the Republic of Kenya to document flock characteristics, management methods, and identify constraints and opportunities in rearing village chicken in the area. Village chickens are reared under scavenging systems mainly as a source of income and food. Flock population per household was 24.2 chicken with 50% chicks and hen to cock ratio of 2.6 to 1.

Good productive hens lay an average of 15.4 eggs having 3.1 clutches per year and a hatchability of 87.5%. However, chick mortality at weaning after three months is high at 62.4%. Main causes of chick mortality are disease and predators. Chicks take 6 months to attain market weight of about 1.2 kg. Most of the farmers apply no specific techniques to boost production. Women own, manage, sell and receive money from chicken sales in most of the households. Constraints to rearing chicken are disease, predators, poor housing, poor management and lack of feed, low market prices and lack of markets.

It was concluded that the potential for village chicken as a source of wealth and development, promotion of gender equity and poverty alleviation is enormous and can be harnessed by training farmers, improving management and marketing systems.

Key words; indigenous chicken, mortality, scavenge, disease, gender equity.

Back

Indigenous chicken is dominant in developing countries (Mopate and Lonny, 1998) despite the introduction of exotic chicken in the 1920s and represent 74% of the number of chicken in Kenya (GOK, 2001).

According to Roberts (1992), village chicken can break the vicious cycle of poverty, malnutrition and disease. Chicken meat is rich nutritionally providing protein, fats, minerals and vitamins. Indigenous chicken can be a good source of cheap nutrition for resource poor households, the sick, malnourished and children under the age of five (Kitalyi, 2002: Personal communication)

But village chicken suffers very high mortality (Aini, 1990; Pandey, 1992) due to causes that are preventable (Wilson et al., 1987). Newcastle Disease (ND) is however believed to be the major cause of mortality in indigenous chicken in Africa and Asia (Bell, 1992)

To harness the potential of village chicken, Kitalyi (1998) suggests a new approach, aiming at increasing flock productivity through improved extension services, farmer training and preferential treatment of chicks

The Objectives of the Survey

The objectives of the survey were: To document; productive characteristics of local chicken, management practices used by the community to rear village chicken, constraints and opportunities in rearing indigenous chicken and facilitate community members design action plans for the improvement of indigenous chicken in the area.

Field Work Approach

The fieldwork was carried out in five zones within Upper and Lower Nyakach divisions of Nyando district (Kusa) in Nyanza province of the Republic of Kenya. Focus Group Discussions (FGD) and person-to-person interviews were used to gather information. A one-day seminar was held at the end of the survey. To estimate quantitative levels of supplementation, each system used to scoop feed was calibrated by weighing. Data was analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Scientists (SPSS) computer program.

Back

General overview

Most of the households rear village chickens under scavenging system mainly as a source of income (39.4%) and food (36.2%). Women own and mange most of the flocks. But chicken meat is only consumed when important guests visit the family. Most farmers (62.5%) prefer chicken with brown plumage color mainly because it lays many eggs and sells faster at the market.

Average flock per household was 24.12 chickens with 50% chicks at a sex ratio of 2.9 hens for one cock. A core of breeding hens is kept to maintain the flock. Some (26%) households did not have a cock. Mopate and Lony (1998) observed a hen to cock ratio of 6:1 in Chad. In general the number of chicken per household was high.

Management Practices

Most of the farmers share their houses with chicken housing them either in the main house and/or in the chicken. The main bedding materials used where chickens are enclosed in the night are soil, sacks and mats with most farmers using soil. The bedding material is swept and/or removed every morning mostly by women. A woven basket locally known as Otete is used for covering chicken in the night to confine them in one part of the house. Few farmers have built poultry houses but are inappropriate.

Back

Feeding

Ninety-eight percent of the farmers feed supplements to chicken. Most of the supplements are bought and fed to chicken in the morning mainly by women. Supplements are spread on the ground when feeding chicken The feed resource base (FRB) consist of maize, kitchen wastes, vegetables, sorghum, rice bran, ants, local fish meal, commercial feeds, flour and milling wastes lacking in vitamins and proteins. More than 75% of the farmers were supplementing with carbohydrates. Fishmeal, which is the main sources of protein, is only occasionally fed to chicken. The total quantitative supplementation is about 3.30 kg per week given mainly during harvest time.

Chickens are given water in all the households mainly by women. Water containers, except dishes are secured in a hole dug in the ground. These containers are seldom removed for cleaning and sanitation. Water is simply refilled when the level goes down.

Back

Flock Health

The mortality is oftentimes more than 50% rising to 100% in most of the farms with an average of 89%. Forty six percent of the farmers had noted a mortality of 100%. Ninety-eight percent of the farmers treat sick chicken with diverse types of drugs including traditional concoctions. 56.7% used traditional methods, 26.9% used modern drugs including non veterinary drugss, 11.9% vaccinated chicks while 4.5% used pesticides to control external parasites.

The most worrying disease symptoms are swollen heads, white diarrhea, closed eyelids, mucus salivary exude from the nostrils and mouth and wheezing and coughing.

From the symptoms described by farmers, it was clear that Newcastle disease (ND), Infectious Bronchitis (IB), Infectious Coryza and Fowl Pox, Fowl Cholera (Common during cold weather), Infectious Bronchitis, Coccidiosis, Fowl Typhoid (Common during warm weather affecting both chicks and adult birds) and Pullorum Disease are common poultry diseases in Kusa. Most ( 95.7%) of the households bury dead birds while 4.3% throw dead birds, which are eventually picked up by scavengers.

Back

Flock Production Characteristics

Hens lay an average of 15.4 eggs per clutch with 3.1 clutches per year. Few farmers wean off chicks at day old and reported 5 clutches per year. Households consume about 18.5% of the eggs laid. Selling of eggs is not common. The average hatchability was good at 87.6% with 62.9% chick mortality. Hens spend 270 days brooding chicks in a year.

The causes of mortality in chicks were predators (42%), disease (18.3%), a combination of disease and predators (36%) and drowning (3.1%).

Constraints to managing indigenous chicks

Main constraints to rearing chicks and adult birds are lack of feed, lack of proper housing, disease outbreaks, predators and poor management Figure 1.

The solutions to these constraints that could be pursued according to farmers' perspectives are constructing proper poultry houses, making feed at home, vaccination and treatment with modern drugs, training and forming poultry groups.

Figure 1. Constraints to managing chicks and adult chicken

Back

Marketing and Marketing Constraints

Households sold an average of 10.6 chickens earning a month income of US$ 1.575, which is below poverty level. Income can be increased through training to reduce mortality, increase number of clutches per year and improve rate of growth. Only three hens are required to earn above poverty level (Table 1). Main marketing constrains are low prices (56.9%), lack of market (25%), disease outbreak (12.5) and high cost of transport to other markets (5.6%). Feeding expenses worked out from 3.3-kg supplements fed per week.

Table 1. Income projections from village chicken under improved management

With three hens a farmer is already above poverty line.

Farmers need training to be able to control disease, improve management and increase size of flock. Most of the farmers have not reared exotic breeds of chicken because they lack skills and capital.

The activities on the action plans were vaccination, training, building poultry houses, marketing and provision of market information, extension services, exchange tours and starting a community livestock resource centre.

Back

Rearing of village chicken in Kusa like in many parts of Africa is not developed like other agricultural sub-sectors. Village chickens are reared on traditional scavenging systems with minimal supplementation. The chickens are reared mainly as a source of income and for food. Unfortunately, chicken meat is consumed only when there is an important guest.

Productivity and hatchability are high despite poor housing, inadequate feed resource base and high mortality and general poor management. Women are playing crucial role in rearing of village chickens in the area. The potential of village chicken as a source of poverty alleviation, improvement of nutrition and promotion of gender equity is high and realizable. There is need to encourage villagers to consume more chicken meat and scientists to develop appropriate interventions to improve production of village chicken and also develop training materials in various local languages.

Back

Aini, I. 1990. "Indigenous chicken production in South-east Asia", Worlds poultry, 46,

51-57.

Bell, J. G.  1992. "The village chicken and disease control", Tanzania Veterinary

Journal, p. 12, 44-47.

Fattah, K. A. 1999. Poultry as a Tool in Poverty Eradication and Promotion of gender

Equality.  Department of Livestock Services. Dhaka (http://www.ihh.kvl.dk/htm/php/tune99/2-Fattah.htm).

GOK 2001. Economic Survey. Livestock Ministry of Agriculture and Rural

Development.

Kitalyi, A. J. 1998. Village chicken production system in rural Africa: Household food security and gender issues, FAO Animal and Health Paper No. 142, Rome, Italy:

FAO

Mopate, L. Y. and Lony, M. 1998. Survey of family chicken in the rural area of

N'Djamena, Chad. http://www.cipav.org.co/lrrd.lrrd11/2/chad112.htm

Pandey, V. S.  1992. "Epidemiology and economics of village poultry production in

Permin, A. and Bisgaard, M., (http://www.ihh.kvl.dk/htm/php/tune99/18-Permin.htm).

Roberts, J. A. 1992. The scavenging feed resource base in assessments of the

productivity of scavenging village chicken. In P. B. Spradbrow, ed. Newcastle

disease in village chicken: control with thermostable oral vaccines. Proceedings of an international workshop, 6-10 October 1991, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Wilson, R. T., Traore, A., Kuit, H. G. and Slingerland, M. 1987. Livestock production

in Central Mali: Reproduction, growth and mortality of domestic under

traditional  management, Tropical Animal Health and Production, p. 9, 229-236

Back

Table of Contents

Introductory Papers

Case Studies

Additional Papers

Discussions

Comments: AGA-Webmaster