

USE AND ABUSE
The Aral Sea
- An environmental tragedy

When water from the Aral
Sea was withdrawn to irrigate cotton, the annual flow of water into the
Sea was reduced by almost 85 percent.
As a result, the sea level fell by 16 metres between 1981 and 1990. Twenty of the 24 species of fish disappeared. The fish catch - which totalled 44 000 tonnes a year in 1950 and supported 60 000 jobs - literally vanished. Moreover, toxic dust-salt from the dry seabed was deposited on the surrounding farmland, killing crops.
A high concentration of salts and toxic chemicals are making the remaining water hazardous to drink. Those who remain in the areas have lost their livelihood - and those who left have become environmental refugees.
Clearly, irrigation that benefits people in one place can have tragic impacts on the livelyhoods of people further downstream.
Today, agriculture is under intense pressure to stop damaging the environment, especially by depleting water sources, polluting water systems, and contributing to soil infertility and erosion. Irrigation must be managed carefully to avoid or reverse environmental damage, which is already extensive, and the spread of water-borne diseases. Overuse of water in one place means deprivation in another.
|
Did you know...
|
Agricultural water withdrawals as a percentage of total renewable water resources
Map shows where withdrawals for agriculture are critical high >40 % and indicative of water stress 20-40 %