| PARAGUAY
|
| 1. INTRODUCTION Paraguay is a landlocked
Central South American country (Figures 1 and 2) which has common frontiers
with Argentina (to the south and west), Brazil (east) and Bolivia (north).
The total land area is 406,752 square km. The country is divided in two
major geographical regions, with distinct topography and geology, by the
south-flowing Paraguay River. Whereas the eastern region (Oriental) with
159,827 square km has an undulating landscape of rolling hills with abundant
rainfall (up to 1,700 mm/year), the western part (Región Occidental or
Chaco) is an extensive semi-arid to sub-humid alluvial plain with 246,925
square km (AHK 1999).
Note: ------------ boundary of Paraguay Figure 1: Biogeographic Provinces of South America and Location of Paraguay. Adapted from Tarso Zuquim and Lima Serrano (1997) Politically, the country is divided into 17 Departments of which the three largest ones are part of the Chaco, whereas the 14 most populated ones belong to the Región Oriental (Figure 3). Land tenure is unbalanced. More than 80 percent of the farmers are small holders with properties of less than 20 hectares, but they account for less than seven percent of the total farming area, whereas farms larger than 1,000 hectares (1 percent of farms) account for 77 percent of the total farm land (GTZ 1994). There are reports of farm occupations, by a growing number of landless campesinos, particularly in the Oriental sector of the country. Figure 2: Map of Paraguay (from World Factbook 2006 Website)
Figure 3: Republic of Paraguay: Political Subdivision, Departamentos (GTZ 1994)
|
4. RUMINANT LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION SYSTEMS There are about 10,000,000 head of cattle, 400,000 sheep, 350,000 horses, 120,000 goats plus 1,800,000 pigs and some 15,000,000 poultry in Paraguay (DCEA 2000). Figures in FAOSTAT for 2005 are 9.6M cattle; 500,000 sheep; 360,000 horses; 155,000 goats; 1.6M pigs and 17.9M poultry (FAO, 2006). Hence, cattle raising for meat and milk is by far the most important livestock sector. Livestock numbers are shown in Table 1. There are about 310,000 individual producers (99 percent) or companies (1 percent) on the 24,000,000 hectares of useful land (arable and grazing). On average there are 5.3 members per producer family. Table 1. Livestock numbers (FAO databases, 2006)
Land and Livestock Tenure. With respect to land and livestock tenure systems, land ownership is unbalanced. Farms between 1 and 20 hectares own less than 15 percent of the livestock and represent more than 70 percent of all producers / producer families. On the other hand, the producer class with more than 1000 hectares (1 percent of the farms) owns 77 percent of the farm land and 60 percent of the livestock population (Table 2). About 25 percent of Paraguays producers are involved exclusively in crop production. Of the rest, 89 percent run mixed farms (Molas et al. 1996), combining, meat or milk production and crops, to diversify activities and minimize risk. The remaining 11 percent are exclusively livestock producers. Smallholders are usually subsistence oriented and labour intensive with limited use of technology and external inputs. However, farms at all production levels are commercially orientated, obviously with increasing market orientation, as the farm size gets bigger. Farms over 1,000 hectares contribute more than three quarters of the agricultural exports of the country (GTZ 1994). Table 2: Land tenure system in Paraguay as analysed by most recent agricultural census (MAG 1992)
Table 3: Distinctive characteristics of farms in the
Oriental Region and the Chaco
There is practically no permanent housing of ruminants. Steer fattening in feedlots has shown marginal profitability. Animals are ranched on natural or improved pastures. Even in intensive dairy systems milking cows gain part of their feeding requirements on pastures near milking pens. Tethering is common among smallholders and landless campesinos, otherwise they keep their animals on public land between the fences at both sides of public roads. Stocking densities on range, bush land and sown pastures vary from about 10 (Alto Paraguay) to 0,2 ha (Central Department) per head of cattle, depending on the agro-ecological conditions and feed and supplement availability. Paraguay has a multicultural rural population with strong minorities (native Indians of at least eight different ethnicities and languages, groups of settlers of Brazilian, German or Japanese origin and foreign investors) which differ considerably in their production systems, production levels and organizational structures. While the native Indians live predominantly by subsistence agriculture on communally owned land, most of them showing little affinity for animal husbandry, typical Paraguayan campesinos and foreign groups of settlers generally apply mixed farming systems on privately owned land, being predominantly market oriented. Foreign investors, representing a fairly high proportion in the Chaco (Table 3), are exclusively commercially oriented and frequently grow monocultures, such as beef, soy bean or cotton. The organizational structure of Paraguayan campesinos and foreign investors is relatively weak. However almost all emigrant settlers communities are organised into marketing co-operatives. Among them are so called "colonies" of Japanese and Mennonites (a religious community of German origin which settled in the Chaco and in eastern Paraguay mainly in the first half of the past century). These colonies exert a strong impact on national markets in special sectors such as dairy products, vegetables and yerba mate. Herd Productivity and Breeds. Beef is commonly produced in extensive systems on the 165,000 square km of native pastures and grazed bush land plus 33,000 square km of cultivated pastures. Main capital investments refer to fencing, establishment of herd handling facilities, construction of dams or so called "Tajamares" (basins for rain water collection) and pasture establishment and maintenance. Traditionally, there was little veterinary care and infrequent herd mustering, no seasonal bull service, no weaning control and little genetic improvement. Therefore, traditional herd productivity is low compared to production figures which are regularly achieved nowadays by a growing number of cattle farmers (Table 4). Table 4: Comparison of traditional and present production parameters of beef cattle herds and grazing lands in the Chaco (Glatzle, 1999)
The energy efficiency of forage was modelled on the basis of the production parameters of both traditional and modern systems. The improved herd productivity results in almost twice as much liveweight being produced from a unit of fodder energy consumed. Moreover, up to a tenfold rise in liveweight production per area (across the whole herd) is achieved by improving the forage base. Hence, improved pasture establishment results in a better land use efficiency (Table 4) as long as the production system is ecologically compatible. More efficient beef production technologies are increasingly adopted by cattle farmers, as indicated by an increase by 66 percent of the nation-wide extraction rate in the past 20 years (Table 6). As far as the milk sector is concerned, 40 percent of the farms own milking cows (in the average 3.6 per farm). Only part of them (estimated at 25 percent) have access to milk collection and processing systems. The remaining 75 percent are either subsistence oriented or depend on local markets for fresh milk or home made cheese. There is a big variation of production levels, taking into account all (not only the commercial) milk producers. Whereas the nation-wide average production parameters are poor, specialised commercial milk producers achieve remarkably high production levels (Table 5) applying high technology, and covering up to 75 percent of the daily feed requirements with concentrates and silages, in order to raise milk yields and to achieve a more balanced production across the seasons. Table 5: Milk production parameters in Paraguay comparing the national average with data from a commercial farm and a Mennonite co-operative (Molas et al. 1996)
The Criollio breed, derived from Spanish and later British cattle importations, is a well adapted, small framed and robust, double purpose breed, highly fertile but otherwise low in production. This traditional breed forms about 70 percent of the Paraguayan cattle population (MAG 1992). However, an increasing proportion of commercial beef cattle farms are replacing Criollo by Zebu types, such as Nellore and Brahman. Frequently a high level of Zebu-genes is maintained in the herds, served by bulls of British (Angus, Hereford) or European continental (Gelbvieh, Fleckvieh, Limousine) breeds in order to produce a fast growing, environmentally adapted and resistant industrial cross. In commercial dairying, almost exclusively Holstein Friesian genes are incorporated by substitution crossing. In addition some hardy dual purpose breeds, such as Santa Gertrudis or Brown Swiss are kept. Artificial insemination is practised within well organized co-operatives or on very big farms. Production, Marketing and Consumption of Animal Products. Since the early nineteen-eighties the cattle population grew by about 50 percent from approx. 6,500,000 to almost 10,000,000 (MAG 1992 and DCEA 2000). In the same period, beef and milk production more than doubled, and indicators of production levels, such as average extraction rate of slaughter animals and milk yields per milking cow, increased by about 65 percent and 25 percent respectively (Table 6). These higher production levels can be attributed to better herd handling, improved veterinary care and the use of adapted and productive breeds, but also to the expansion of the area sown to improved pastures. Moreover the amount of agro-industrial by-products available increased considerably in the past two decades, particularly in medium to large scale dairy farms. In 2000, total agricultural imports reached a value of US$ 383,241,000 and exports a value of US$ 647,699,000 (FAO 2005) by 2003 figures were US$ 207.7 for imports and US$ 1.02 billion for exports. Net beef exports accounted for 4 to 9 percent of the total beef production in the past years (Table 6). Beef exports vary from year to year and depend very much on the outbreaks of Foot and Mouth Disease and a positive immunological status of the animals due to compulsory vaccinations; meat exports beyond South America are insignificant. Beef imports are negligible, like imports and exports of other meats. Almost all wool and hides are processed locally or discarded. There is only commercial milk production where an efficient and reliable collection system and a processing plant have been built up. This is the case in the Central Department (around the capital Asunción) with about 1,000,000 inhabitants, in the Boquerón and Presidente Hayes Departments (Chaco) and the Departments Caaguazú and Alto Paraná (Oriental Region). Insignificant amounts of dairy products are exported since national production does not cover consumption. Imported milk equivalents (predominantly from Argentina) account in recent years for 7 to 13 percent of the national production of commercialised milk (Table 6). More than half of the meat consumed is beef. As stated in Table 6, total meat consumption is high in Paraguay. On the other hand the supply of processed milk is unsatisfactory (less than 2/3 of the 150 kg/head/yr. recommended by the FAO). Table 6: Paraguay statistics of production, exports and consumption of animal products and important agro-industrial by-products used as animal feeds (FAO 2006)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6. OPPORTUNITIES FOR IMPROVEMENT OF FODDER RESOURCES Sown Pastures with Introduced Forages. The establishment of pastures with selected grasses and legumes on cleared land raises herd productivity per unit area about ten fold (Glatzle and Cabrera 1996, and Table 3). Hence it is not surprising that the area of cultivated pastures increased five to six fold since 1980, mostly at the expense of native forests and bush. Large scale land clearing and pasture establishment obviously has adverse effects on landscape and species diversity and carbon sequestration. Therefore it is indispensable to take into account a number of land clearing regulations in order to maintain or create a healthy and diverse agro-ecosystem. A steadily increasing number of farmers leave at least 25 percent of the forest, woodlands or bush of a property intact (Ley Forestal 422/73).
A significantly higher biodiversity was found when pastures contained a large number of native bush niches (strips and "islands") and when the use of fire as a management tool was restricted or avoided (Glatzle 1999). Moreover, at sites with an elevated dry land salinity risk (high water table of saline ground water in a semi-arid climate, such as the Chaco), native bush fulfils the important role of preventing salinity due to the very high suction forces produced by many Chaco woody species, capable of keeping the ground water at a low level (Glatzle et al. 2001). Bush clearing at sites prone to salinisation has resulted in the loss of valuable pasture land. Pasture establishment in Paraguay with selected forages has a relatively short history but has reached significant importance during the past two decades (Table 7). Probably with the introduction and multiplication of buffel grass (Cenchrus ciliaris) by an American agricultural advisor of the Mennonite colonies in the Central Chaco, Robert Unruh, in the early nineteen fifties, cultivated pastures attained economic importance for the first time. Later on, a number of other introduced grasses gained commercial importance and were multiplied on a national level (Table 8). When the German-Paraguayan Project "Estación Experimental Chaco Central" started in the early nineteen-nineties, a new era started for the commercial use of introduced pasture legumes (Table 8). In order to maintain productivity, cultivated pastures require, even more than native grazing lands, a correct adjustment of stocking rates. Typical stocking rates range from about 0.5 to 2 bovine units per hectare along the rainfall gradient across Paraguay, from north-west to south-east. Maximum energy conversion from Panicum maximum cv. Gatton and Cynodon nlemfuensis pastures in the Central Chaco by grazing steers (into animal liveweight per ha) was attained by a stocking rate of 1.8 AU/ ha (Stosiek et al. 1997). This figure exceeds, however, the recommended long term ecological optimum stocking rate for this zone (0.8 to 1.2 AU/ ha). Maintenance interventions, such as woody weed control, are necessary to maintain long term profitability of sown pastures. Other grasses cultivated on a commercial scale, but of much less importance than the ones mentioned in Table 8, are: Chloris gayana cv. Callide, Panicum coloratum cv. Bambatsi, Brachiaria decumbens, B. mutica, B. humidicola, Cynodon sp. Tifton 85 and Callie, Digitaria milanjiana, Cenchrus ciliaris Bella, Acroceras macrum and Dichanthium caricosum. Pasture legumes of secondary importance are: Macroptilium atropurpureum Siratro, Lotononis bainesii, Stylosanthes scabra cv. Seca and Siran, S. hamata cv. Amiga, Clitoria ternatea cv. Milgarra and Chamaecrista rotundifolia cv. Wynn. Other Fodders. Among the most important cultivated forages is Silage Sorghum for dairy enterprises. In the Central Chaco (accounting for about 50 percent of the national milk production), the area cultivated with Silage Sorghum is estimated at over 10,000 hectares. At smallholder level in Eastern Paraguay some silage is made from Pennisetum purpureum (Cameroon grass). Part of the grain Sorghum (23,000 t on 16,000 ha in Paraguay) and maize (900,000 t on 370,000 ha in Paraguay) is used for concentrates, to be mixed at farm or at small commercial enterprise level with the agro-industrial by-products obtained predominantly from oilseeds (Table 6). No statistics are available on total concentrate feed production, nor on the proportions used to feed dairy cows, pigs, horses or poultry. However, concentrates used for beef production are negligible. A typical emergency feed is sugar cane, grown on a small area on many farms and harvested in the dry season. During prolonged drought periods (about one in 10 years), whole sugar cane (produced in more humid Eastern Paraguay) is sold to cattle farmers in the Dry Chaco to enable them to maintain at least their breeding herd. There is little haymaking in Paraguay. Similarly, there is virtually no irrigated fodder production due to
Table 8: Commercially important pasture grasses and legumes in Paraguay
Constraints. The main constraints to pasture establishment, grassland management, forage and ruminant production and product marketing in Paraguay are the following:
Pasture seed production. There is a strong small to medium scale pasture seed production in the Central Chaco of Paraguay at farm level. The seed produced are Panicum maxium cv. Gatton, Cenchrus ciliaris cv. Texas 4464 and Bella, Urochloa mosambicensis, Chloris gayana cv. Callide, selections of Digitaria milanjiana, Panicum coloratum cv. Bambatsi, Sorghum sudanense, Leucaena leucocephala, Alysicarpus vaginalis, Desmanthus virgatus cv. Filadelfia and Stylosanthes hippocampoides cv. Oxley. Total seed production attains several hundred tons a year. Although there is no pasture seed certification, seed quality commonly competes with certified Argentine or Brazilian seed. Most seed is locally marketed directly between farms or via the co-operatives of the zone. Bigger seed producers also export Gatton Panic seed to neighbouring Argentina and Bolivia. However, practically all Brachiaria spp. seed and most Panicum maximum cv. Tanzania and cv. Colonial seed which are used in Paraguay, are imported from Brazil, because seed yields are too low under local conditions. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATIONS AND PERSONNEL At present little research is carried out actively in Paraguay in the fodder and pasture sector. However, in the past, international or bilateral programmes and projects introduced and screened pasture species, initiated trials on pasture and herd handling and grazing management, and disseminated innovations in the forage and livestock sector. For example:
Besides that, there were many initiatives by individual farmers to introduce and test species they brought in from other countries, mostly Brazil and Argentina. Most of the Brachiaria species and a number of Cynodon cultivars came in through this channel and were spread from farmer to farmer. More recently, livestock farmers interested in applied experimentation became privately organised in the "Consorcio Ganadero para la Experimentación Agropecuaria (CEA)". CEA holds a highly appreciated international congress on technology transfer every year in Asunción at the headquarters of the "Asociación Rural del Paraguay (ARP)". CEA members even organised an information travel of farmers to Queensland, Australia, from where a lot of new ideas and aspects on cattle breeds and grass cultivars came into the country. Moreover, the ARP is the organiser of a big annual Agricultural Trade Fair, where regularly cattle breeds and adapted pasture seed are exposed and marketed. On a regional level, farmers conscious of sustainable and profitable production systems organise themselves in so called CREA-groups ("Consorcio Regional de Extensión Agropecuaria"). Some private CREA groups work very efficiently, and sometimes contrast favourably with public extension services, such as divisions of the Ministry based "Dirección de Extensión Agrícola y Ganadera (DEA)" or even services offered by credit institutes, such as CAH, BNF and Fondo Gandero. Only about one in ten farms is reached by a pubic extension service at a nation-wide average (Molas et al. 1996). However, many producers co-operatives provide competent technical assistance to their members. A new programme has started in October 2001 at Loma Plata, Chaco, the "Iniciativa para la Investigación y Transferencia de Tecnología Agraria Sostenible (INTTAS)", initiated by the private foundation DeSdel-Chaco ("Fundación para el Desarrollo Sostenible del Chaco"), and sponsored by the Swiss foundation AVINA ("Acción para la Vida y la Naturaleza"). This programme integrates, co-ordinates and complements the on-farm-experimentation and technology dissemination activities carried out by various co-operatives and their extension services, and private farmer groups within the Paraguayan Chaco. Furthermore, INTTAS is to reactivate a virtually paralysed public research station in the Chaco Region, implementing joint research programmes, and to promote regular exchange of experience with private and public entities of interest from the other Chaco countries, Argentina and Bolivia. The "Dirección de Investigación Agrícola (DIA)", part of the Ministry of Agriculture, carries out research mainly in the cropping sector in 9 research stations spread over the country. However, little importance is given to research in pastures and forages. The mandate of another Ministry-dependent research unit, the "Dirección de Investigación de Producción Animal (DIPA)", is to conduct research in the animal production sector in three stations across the country. Again, the products of co-operative based and other private initiatives on animal breeding, animal selection and improvement of herd handling are more obvious than public efforts in this field. The low efficiency of public research in Paraguay is primarily due to the lack of operational funds. More than 80% of the small budgets available (including revenues generated on the research stations) are used to cover the personnel costs. In contrast to many other countries throughout Latin America efforts to revamp public-sector agricultural research and development agencies in Paraguay have yet to come to fruition. Major change was proposed in the mid-1990s in the form of the establishment of a national agricultural research institute, the Paraguayan Institute of Agrarian Technology (IPTA), as a joint public-private venture with multiple funding sources. The proposal for the creation of IPTA is still pending, however, and it now appears that no legislative decision will be made until at least 2002, following a public reform process that is currently underway in Paraguay Beintema et al. (2000). On the other hand meanwhile, a strong negative selection process is being observed, by skilled technicians and scientists moving away from the public sector (DIA and DIPA) into private research and development entities. Some kind of extension work and small scale experimentation in the forage and livestock sector is done by institutions of higher education which are:
Distinguished Technicians currently engaged in public or private research programmes in the pasture and forage sector are: Jefe Sección Pastura Estación Experimental Chaco Central Cruce de los Pioneros Ruta Trans-Chaco - km 412 PARAGUAY E-Mail: ajncabrera@hotmail.com Ing. Agr. Estación Experimental Pilar Pilar Tacuary esq. Dr. Mazzei PARAGUAY Tel: xx-595-86-32884 E-mail: jasd@telesurf.com.py Profesor Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, UNA Dpto. Producción Animal Campo Universitario, San Lorenzo Paraguay E-Mail: alfa@rieder.net.py Servicio Agropecuario, Chortitzer Komite Loma Plata - 101 / Chaco C.d.c. 883 Asunción PARAGUAY E-Mail: sapchknk@telesurf.com.py Profesor Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, UNA Campo Universitario, San Lorenzo PARAGUAY E-Mail: vdecano@agr.una.py Servicio Agropecuario, Chortitzer Komite Loma Plata - 101 / Chaco C.d.c. 883 Asunción PARAGUAY Tel: xx 595 918 2301 |
| 8. REFERENCES Abril, A. and E.H. Bucher (2001): Overgrazing and soil carbon dynamics in the western Chaco of Argentina. Applied Soil Ecology 16, 243 - 249 Adámoli, J., E. Sennhauser, J.M. Acero and A. Rescia (1990): Stress and disturbance: Vegetation dynamics in the dry Chaco region of Argentina. Journal of Biogeography 17, 491 - 500 AHK (1999): PARAGUAY. Deutsch-Paraguayische Industrie- und Handelskammer, Asunción, Paraguay Beintema, N.M., P. Zambrano, M. Nuñez, and P.G. Pardey (2000): Agricultural R&D in Paraguay: Policy, Investments, and Institutional Profile. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington D.C. Bertoni, G.T. and J.R. Gorham (1973): The Geography of Paraguay. In J.R. Gorham (ed.). Paraguay: Ecological Essays. Academy of the Arts and Sciences of the Americas, Miami, pp. 9 - 18 BGR (2001): Proyecto Sistema Ambiental del Chaco. Inventario, evaluación y recomendaciones para la protección de los espacios naturales en la Región Occidental. Bundesanstalt für Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe, Hannover DCEA (2000): Síntesis Estadística 1999/2000. Dirección de Censos y Estadísticas Agropecuarias, Ministerio de Agricultura y Ganadería, Asunción, Paraguay Degen, R. (1996): Dinámica poblacional de Copernicia alba Morong "Caranday". Dirección de Ordenamiento Ambiental and Estación Experimental Chaco Central (unpublished report) Eidt, R.C. (1969): The climatology of South America. In E.J.J. Illes, H. Klinge, G.H. Schwabe, and H. Sioli (eds.). Biogeography and ecology of South America. Vol. 1. Dr. W. Junk, The Hague FAO (2006): Online Statistical Database. http://apps.fao.org Fatecha, A. (1989): Present and potential area for agricultural use in the Arid Chaco of Paraguay. In M. Hump and M.A. Tiefert (eds.). Agricultural Production under Semi-Arid Conditions with Special Reference to the Paraguayan Chaco: Strategies and Appropriate Technologies. DSE Feldafing, pp. 26-49 Fretes, R., C. Gay and R. Samudio (1969): Las praderas naturales del Paraguay. I. Clasificación y caracterización. Programa Nacional de Investigación y Extensión Ganadera. Publicación No. 6, San Lorenzo Glatzle, A. and A.J.N. Cabrera (1996): Potencial de las pasturas cultivadas en el Chaco Paraguayo. In Consorcio de Ganaderos para Experimentación Agropecuaria (ed.): CEA 96; Forrajes. IIIer Congreso Internacional de Transferencia Tecnológica Agropecuaria (17 y 18 de Nov. 1996), Asunción, 155 - 168 Glatzle, A. (1999): Compendio para el Manejo de Pasturas en el Chaco. Edición El Lector, Asunción, Paraguay Glatzle, A., R. Schultze-Kraft, and R. Mitlöhner (2001): Potential Role of Native Bush in the Chaco for Mitigation of Dryland Salinity in Grassland. XIX International Grassland Congress, February 2001, Piracicaba, Brazil, ID 24-02 Gorham, J.R. (1973): The Paraguayan Chaco and Its Rainfall. In J.R. Gorham (ed.). Paraguay: Ecological Essays. Academy of the Arts and Sciences of the Americas, Miami, U.S.A., pp. 39 - 60 GTZ (1994): PARAGUAY. Perfil del país con informaciones y comentarios relacionados al desarrollo económico y social. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit, Eschborn, Germany Hacker, J.B., A. Glatzle and R. Vanni (1996): Paraguay - a potential source of new pasture legumes for the subtropics. Tropical Grasslands 30, 273 - 281 MAG (1992): Censo Agropecuario Nacional 1991. Ministerio de Agricultura y Ganadería, Asunción, Paraguay MAG (1996): Lineamiento Estratégico para el Desarrollo del Sector Agropecuario y Forestal. Ministerio de Agricultura y Ganadería, Asunción, Paraguay Mereles, F., R. Degen and N. Lopez de Kochalca (1992): Humedales en el Paraguay: Breve reseña de su vegetación. Amazoniana 12, 305 - 316 Molas, O., R. Heyn and R. Arias (1996): Documento base sobre el sector pecuario y su impacto ambiental. ENAPRENA, Asunción, Paraguay Morello, J. and C. Saravia Toledo (1959): El Bosque chaqueño. II. La ganadería y el bosque en el Oriente de Salta. Revista Agronómica del Noroeste Argentino 3 (1-2), 209 - 258 Ramella, I. and R. Spichiger (1989): Interpretación preliminar del medio físico y de la vegetación del Chaco Boreal. Contribución al estudio de la flora de la vegetación del Chaco. Candollea 44, 639 - 680 Ramírez, E.G. and J.L. Laneri (1989): Fodder and Feeding of Cattle in the Paraguayan Chaco. In M. Hump and M.A. Tiefert (eds.). Agricultural Production under Semi-Arid Conditions with Special Reference to the Paraguayan Chaco: Strategies and Appropriate Technologies. DSE Feldafing, pp. 139-148 Sáchez, T.F. (1973): The climate of Paraguay. In J.R. Gorham (ed.). Paraguay: Ecological Essays. Academy of the Arts and Sciences of the Americas, Miami, U.S.A., pp. 33 - 38 Stosiek, D., A. Glatzle and R. Schultze-Kraft (1997): Utilized Metabolizable Energy and Its Impact on the Management of Grass Pastures in the Central Chaco of Paraguay. Proc. XVIIIth International Grassland Congress, Winnipeg and Saskatoon, Canada, 29-7 - 29-8 Tarso Zuquim, P. and I. Lima Serrano (1997): Tuiuiú: Under the skies of the Pantanal. Empresa de Artes, São Paulo, Brazil (work sponsored by Monsanto do Brazil) Verma, G.P. (1982): Research needs for the development and improvement of dryland agriculture in the Paraguayan Chaco. Unpublished report of the Technical and Economic Co-operation between the Government of the Republic of India, New Delhi, India and the Government of the Republic of Paraguay, Asunción, Paraguay World Factbook (2006). CIA World Factbook 2006 - Paraguay. |
| 9. CONTACTS
Glatzle, Dr. Albrecht Stosiek, Dieter [The profile was prepared in 2001; minor editing was done by J.M. Suttie and S.G. Reynolds in November 2001 and S.G. Reynolds further modified the profile in May 2006]. |