Country Pasture/Forage Resource Profiles


Nigeria

by
Eroarome Martin Aregheore


1. Introduction
2. Soils and Topography
Topography
Soils
3. Climate and Agro-ecological Zones
Climate
Agro-ecological zones
4. Ruminant Livestock Production Systems
Traditional or extensive or Village systems
Nomadic or pastoral systems
Mixed farming (Integrated Crop/Livestock)
Peri-urban and modern ruminant livestock husbandry
Ruminant Livestock
Beef cattle
Dairy development in Nigeria
Traditional milk products
Small ruminants
5. The Pasture Resource
Natural Grassland
Improved Pastures
6. Opportunities for Improvement of Fodder Resources
Establishment of Legumes
Leguminous browse and multipurpose trees
Development of aquatic resources
Supplementation of crop residues and agro-industrial by products with forage
7. Research and Development Organizations and Personnel
8. References
9. Contacts

1. INTRODUCTION

The Federal Republic of Nigeria is in West Africa between Latitudes 4 o to 14o North and between Longitudes 2o2’ and 14 o 30’ East. To the north the country is bounded by the Niger Republic and Chad; in the west by the Benin Republic, in the East by the Cameroon Republic and to the south by the Atlantic Ocean. The country takes its name from its most prominent river, the Niger. Nigeria has a land area of about 923 769 km2 (FOS, 1989); a north-south length of about 1 450 km and a west-east breadth of about 800 km. Its total land boundary is 4 047 km while the coastline is 853 km. The Federal Ministry of Environment of Nigeria (FMEN, 2001) 1993 estimate of irrigated land is 9 570 km2 and arable land about 35 %; 15 % pasture; 10 % forest reserve; 10 % for settlements and the remaining 30 % considered uncultivable for one reason or the other.  Boomie (1998) corroborated the irrigated land at 9 570 km2 with arable land at 33 %; permanent crops 3 %; permanent pastures 44 %; forests and woodland 12 % and others 8 %. Cleaver and Shreiber (1994) put the surface area of Nigeria as 91.07 million hectares, 57 % of which is believed to be either under crops or pastures while the remaining 43 % is divided amongst forest, water bodies and other uses.

Nigeria is a country of marked ecological diversity and climatic contrasts. The lowest point is the Atlantic Ocean at sea level while the highest point is the Chappal Waddi at 2 419 m. Nigeria has diverse biophysical characteristics, ethnic nationalities, agro-ecological zones and socio-economic conditions. It has evolved over time and space in terms of administrative structures and nature of governance. It started as an amalgamated British colony in 1914, became a federation in 1963; then became independent in 1960 as a two-unit region comprising the Northern and Southern provinces. An additional Mid-Western region was created in 1963. Also in 1963, Nigeria was proclaimed a republic.

The three former regions (Western, Eastern and Northern) excluding the Midwest were later divided into 12 states in 1967 along with a number of sub-administrative divisions for each state. In 1976 the states were increased to 19, in 1987 to 21 and 30 in 1987 (Figure 1). Further changes in the administrative composition of the country include the redefining of the political regions as local government areas (LGAs) and the creation of the new Abuja Federal Capital Territory (FCT) on December 12 1991. With this, Lagos ceased to be the country’s capital, a position that it held right from before independence. Thus today Abuja is the capital while Lagos is the largest city in terms of population and the main commercial centre. There are now 744 LGAs. The present 36 States structure emerged in 1996 during the time of erstwhile Babaginda, with the creation of 6 additional states namely Bayelsa, Ebonyi, Ekiti, Gombe, Nasarawa and Zamfara. Today Nigeria consists of 36 states and the Federal Capital Territory located at Abuja (Figure 1).

Nigeria is the most populous country in Africa with an estimated population of 131,859,731 inhabitants (July 2006 estimate, World Factbook). The average annual growth rate according to the 2006 estimate was 2.38 %. Nigeria’s population is divided among 478 different ethnic groups, some numbering fewer than 10 000 people. Of the different ethnic groups, ten (Hausa, Fulani, Yoruba, Ibo, Kanuri, Tiv, Edo, Nupe, Ibibio and Ijaw) account for nearly 80% of the population. Twenty-five percent of the population is in the former Western Region (12% of area), 21% in the former Eastern Region (9% of area), and 53% in the former Northern Region (79% of area). The lowest population densities are in the northern regions, especially in Borno, Adamawa, Kebbi, Kwara, Taraba, Yobe and Zamfara States. Details of Nigeria’s population density are presented in Figure 2.

Figure 1. Map of Nigeria showing the different states

Nigeria's economy has been dominated since the late nineteen-sixties by the export of oil, a sector dominated by the Government. By the mid-nineteen-seventies, about 75% of Federal revenue came from petroleum. The share of exports accounted for by fuel, mineral and metals continued to rise and stood at 96% in 1991 (World Bank, 1993). In 2004, the share of export commodities from petroleum and petroleum products was 95 %, while cocoa, rubber and others contributed most of the remainder of exports. Nigeria’s industrial production growth rate was 2.3 % (2004 estimate) (CIA World Factbook, 2004). GDP growth rose marginally in 2004, led by oil and natural gas exports. The capital-intensive oil sector provides 20% of GDP, 95% of foreign exchange earnings, and about 65% of budgetary revenues (2004 estimate) (CIA World Factbook, 2004).

The development of the petroleum industry in the late nineteen-sixties and nineteen-seventies radically transformed Nigeria from an agricultural based economy to a major oil exporter. Increased earnings from petroleum exports generated high levels of real economic growth, and by the mid-nineteen-seventies Nigeria ranked as the dominant economy in sub-Saharan Africa and as the continent's major exporter of crude petroleum. Notwithstanding the decline in world petroleum prices after 1981, the government became increasingly over-extended financially, with insufficient revenue from petroleum to pay the rising cost of imports or to finance major development projects. The decline in Nigeria's earnings of foreign exchange led to an accumulation of arrears in trade debts and of import shortages, which, in turn, resulted in a sharp fall in economic activity, with most of Nigerian industry struggling to operate without essential imported raw materials and spare parts. A series of poor harvests, an overvalued currency and a widening budget deficit compounded the problem.

The dramatic fall in international prices for petroleum in 1986, and reduced output in all sectors (except agriculture), kept the economy in the depths of recession, thus in July 1986 the government announced a two-year structural adjustment program (SAP). This programme was aimed at expanding non-oil exports, reducing the import of goods that could be manufactured locally, achieving self-sufficiency in food and increasing the role of the private sector. The SAP included the abolition of import licenses and a reduction in import duties. Consequently in 1994, the SAP was abandoned, following a severe deterioration in political and economic conditions in the early nineteen-nineties. Economic instability was also reflected in a persistently high rate of inflation, which increased from an annual average of 24.0% in 1986-91, to a peak 72.8% in 1995.

Between 1996 and 1998, the Nigerian economy recorded impressive macroeconomic stability while it continued to show positive signs of growth (as reported by the Federal Ministry of Finance). These included the exchange rate and the rate of inflation. The improved performance of the economy in 1997 was as a result of the sustained implementation of a sound fiscal policy dovetailed into an anti-inflationary monetary stance. Indeed, inflation rate decelerated dramatically to reach a 7-year low of 8.5% by the end of December 1997.

Figure 2. Map of Nigeria showing population density
[Click to view full image]
Source: FAO (1993)

The Role of Agriculture in the Country’s Economy
Before Nigeria attained independence, agriculture was the most important sector of the economy, and accounted for more than 50% of GDP and more than 75% of export earnings. Consequently, with the rapid expansion of the petroleum industry, agricultural development was neglected, and the sector entered a relative decline. Thus, between the mid-nineteen-sixties and the mid-nineteen-eighties, Nigeria moved from a position of self-sufficiency in basic foodstuffs to one of heavy dependence on imports. Under-investment, a steady drift away from the land to urban areas (cities), increased consumer preference for imported foodstuffs (particularly rice and wheat) and outdated farming techniques continued to keep the level of food production well behind the rate of population growth. Table 1 shows production indices for Agriculture from 1995 – 2004 and Figure 3 shows the distribution of economic activity.

Table 1. Agriculture - Production indices

Indices

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

Total Agricultural Production  (Export value at base year quantity (1000$)

613,602

549512

456341

398473

469088

330198

413574

397916

602804

-

Total food production (Export value at base year quantity (1000$)

287436

347407

285344

302309

404829

235292

271467

293470

514817

-

Per caput

84.9

89.0

92.4

96.6

100

1004.4

96.6

102.8

104.7

104.9

Food per caput

97.8

99.5

100.4

102.0

102.7

100.3

97.0

97.5

97

94.8

Roots and Tubers total (MT)
'000

56667

57391

59450

62953

65429

65164

65942

68386

66629

66629

Coarse grains total (MT)
'000

19549

18496

18519

18667

19027

17999

17311

18821

19432

19432

Cereals total (MT)
'000

22512

21665

21853

22040

22405

21370

20114

22090

24257

24457

Vegetables total (MT)
'000

2608

3506

3657

3815

3868

3945

4000

4276

4300

4300

-- data not available.
Source: FAOSTAT data 2005. (accessed June 26, 2005).

During the early nineteen-seventies Nigeria experienced growth rates of 8% -10% per annum, while the increase in agricultural production declined to around 4% per annum towards the end of the decade. The slow growth continued into the nineteen-eighties, with output rising by only 3.4% in 1981 and by 2.7% in 1982. The effects of drought and the government's austerity program resulted in severe 9.4% fall in agricultural output in 1983. However, a succession of good harvests, higher producer prices, reductions in cereal imports and a resurgence of public and private investment in crop production resulted in a sharp recovery in production (FAO, 2001). Table 2 presents output of some major staple food crops from 1995 – 2004.

Figure 3. Economic activity

Food output showed the strongest growth, rising by 7% in 1984 and by an estimated 10% in 1985, while total agricultural output increased by 3.8%. Agriculture was the only sector to show any significant expansion in 1986, with an estimated increase in overall agricultural production of 2.1%. From 1981-94 the average annual growth of GDP was 2.3% compared to 4.6% for the earlier period 1970-80. Average growth from agriculture from 1980 to 1992 was estimated to be 3.6% and this compares favourably with an average of 1.7% for Sub-Saharan Africa. For the earlier period agricultural production in Nigeria declined by -0.1% (World Bank, 1993). Agriculture (including hunting, forestry and fishing) contributed 33.5% of GDP in 1993 and an estimated 63.7% of the labour force was employed in the sector in that year.

Table 2. Production statistics of some major staple foods (MT)

Staples

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

Maize ('000)

6931

5667

5254

5127

5476

4107

4620

4934

5150

5150

Millet ('000)

5563

5881

5902

5956

5960

6105

5530

6100

6100

6100

Sorghum ('000)

6997

7084

7297

7516

7520

7711

7081

7704

8100

8100

Rice ('000)

2920

3122

3268

3275

3277

3298

2752

3192

4952

4952

Wheat ('000)

44

47

66

98

101

73

51

77

73

73

Cassava ('000)

31404

31418

32050

32695

32697

32010

32586

34476

33379

33379

Yam ('000)

22818

23201

23972

24768

25873

26201

26374

26849

27000

27000

Cocoyam ('000)

1182

1195

1832

3823

3835

3886

3910

3929

3500

35000

Sweet potato ('000)

1168

1478

1493

1560

2451

2468

2473

2503

2150

2150

Potato ('000)

95

99

103

107

573

599

599

629

600

600

Plantain ('000)

1632

1687

1744

1803

1902

1969

1999

2058

2110

2110

Other crops                    

Groundnut ('000)

1579

2278

2531

2534

2894

2901

2683

2699

2700

2700

Soyabeans ('000)

287

322

361

403

410

429

436

437

484

484

Melon ('000)

287

317

330

330

338

345

348

347

347

347

Tomatoes ('000)

569

569100

650

810

879

879

879

889

889

889

Chilli/peppers ('000)

612

633

745

709

715

715

715

720

720

720

Onions ('000)

500

550

567

580

596

600

600

600

615

615

Pineapples ('000)

800

800

830

857

881

881

881

889

889

889

Mangoes ('000)

631

656

689

731

729

730

730

730

730

730

Papaya ('000)

648

662

675

751

748

748

748

755

755

755

Okra ('000)

630

650

612

638

719

719

719

730

730

730

Green corn ('000)

575

575

575

575

575

575

575

576

576

576

Carrots ('000)

198

203

210

225

231

231

231

235

235

235

Coconut ('000)

149

151

152

152

158

160

161

161

161

161

Kolanut ('000)

95

85

82

82

82

82

82

85

85

85

Cashew nut ('000)

95

110

125

152

176

184

185

186

186

186

Tobacco leaves ('000)

9200

9200

9200

9200

9200

9200

9200

9200

9200

9200

Source: FAOSTAT data 2005. (accessed June 26, 2005).

Agricultural output increased by an estimated 4.1 per cent during 1993 compared to 1995 and 1996 with increases of 3.5 and 3.7 per cent, respectively. The value of agricultural production constituted 38.7 per cent of the nation's GDP. In spite of the continued satisfactory performance of the agricultural sector, it still fell short of the 5.5 per cent growth rate stipulated in the National Rolling Plan for 1997 – 1999 and to this date continued to decline because of lack of interest in farming by young people. The largely subsistence agricultural sector has failed to keep up with rapid population growth and Nigeria once a large net exporter of food, now must import food. According to 2004 estimate the value of agriculture production constituted 30.8%; industry, 43.8 % and services 25.4 %, of the nation’s GDP, respectively. The nation’s GDP real growth rate stood at 7.1% (CIA World Factbook, 2004).

Traditional smallholders, who use simple techniques of production and the bush-fallow system of cultivation, account for around two-thirds of Nigeria's total agricultural production. The number of state farms is relatively small, and of decreasing importance. Subsistence food crops (mainly sorghum, maize, taro, yams, cassava, rice and millet) are grown in the central and western areas of Nigeria, and are traded largely outside the cash economy. Cash crops (mainly palm kernels, cotton, cocoa, rubber and groundnuts) are grown in the east, west, mid-west and northern states of the country. It is estimated that Nigeria has about 71.2 million hectares of available agricultural land and about half of which is currently being utilized. Increasing rainfall from the semi-arid north to the tropical rain forested south allows great crop diversity, from short season cereals, sorghum, millet and wheat in the north to cassava, yams and rice in the wetter areas. In the drier north cash crops include cotton, groundnuts and tobacco, while in the south cocoa, coffee rubber, oil palm, sugar and ginger are grown.

A steady growth has been observed in the agricultural production of both staple and cash crops since 1990 and the aggregate index of agricultural production increased by 4.1 per cent in 1997 but declined in 1998. However, from 1999 all the major staples recorded significant increases over the proceeding years’ level. The intensification of on-farm adaptive research by some relevant agencies, the supply of high quality seeds/seedlings and better usage of improved storage facilities contributed to the observed improvement in staple food production. Estimates of production output for principal staple crops in 2003 were maize (5.2 million tons), sorghum (8.0 million tons), millet (6.1 million. tons) and rice (4.9 million. tons). Others include cassava (33.5m tons), yams (27.0 million tons), potatoes (6.0 million tons) and vegetables (9.1 million tons).

Among the cash crops, only cocoa makes any significant contribution to exports. Nigeria was the world's fourth largest exporter of cocoa beans in 1990/91, with sales of 135 000 tons accounting for about 7.1% of world trade in this commodity. But Nigeria's share of the world cocoa market has been substantially reduced in recent years, owing to aging trees, low producer prices, black pod disease, smuggling and labour shortages. Recent emphasis has been placed on encouraging domestic cocoa-processing, to provide higher-value products for export. Table 3 presents major cash crops production outputs in Nigeria from 1995 – 2003. Nigeria was the world's leading exporter of palm oil, until overtaken by Malaysia in 1971. The production of oil palm products has increased somewhat since 2000 however the country is still heavily dependent on imports in order to satisfy domestic needs. Like other cash-crop sectors, output of palm products suffered from labour shortages, inefficient traditional harvesting methods, and lack of vital inputs and low levels of capital investment. However, a sharp reduction in imports and large-scale replanting resulted in a substantial increase in production during the mid-nineteen-eighties. Trade liberalization and the exchange rate policies adopted in the nineteen-eighties have contributed to the improvement in palm oil production. Also there have been substantial investments in oil-milling facilities to produce vegetable oil for domestic use and since 2000 oil palm products continued to increase for the reasons stated above.

Table 3. Major cash crops production outputs (1 000 tons)

Crops

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

Oil palm fruit ('000)

7800

7750

7750

7800

8000

8220

8500

8500

8600

8700

Palm kernels ('000)

543

548

545

545

562

577

579

608

610

610

Palm oil ('000)

860

776

810

845

896

899

903

908

910

910

Cocoa beans ('000)

203

323

318

370

225

338

340

340

361

366

Coffee

3090

3780

3700

3700

3750

3830

3850

3910

3320

3520

Rubber ('000)

125

130

120

120

107

107

108

112

142

142

Seed cotton ('000)

251

301

341

348

381

399

402

403

397

417

Cotton lint ('000)

95

116

130

135

145

147

148

150

140

140

Cotton seed ('000)

153

183

208

212

236

247

248

250

250

250

Sugar cane ('000)

589

615

675

675

682

695

705

747

739

776

Source: FAOSTAT data 2005. (accessed June 26, 2005)

In 1990 Nigeria overtook Liberia as the largest rubber producer in Africa. Production rose from 60, 000 tons in 1986 to 147, 000 tons in 1990. It dropped to 125,000 tons in 1995 and 107, 000 tons in 2000 but went up again in 2003 to 142,000 tons and remained at 142, 000 in 2004. Benefits from a replanting programme in the eastern States, Edo and Delta states have yet to materialize, and local demand from tyre and footwear industries continues to outstrip domestic supply. A programme to increase output of rubber and palm kernels, with financial assistance from the World Bank, is being implemented. Also various state governments are encouraging farmers to increase rubber production by providing interested farmers with subsidies (FMEN, 2001). Compared to the previous years’ production (1995 – 1997), cottonseed has continued to increase and some of the reasons for the increase were considerable public and private investment in the sector, as well as incentives for local textile companies and higher tariffs on imported cotton.

The supply of animal products has been declining over the past two decades, while demand has been increasing, as a result of increases in population and urbanization. Consequently, Nigeria has remained a net importer of livestock and livestock products. Restrictions placed on imports of animal products and foodstuffs in the nineteen-eighties coupled with the introduction of the Structural Adjustment Program (SAP), which saw a massive devaluation of the Nigerian currency, initially reduced the imports of meat and dairy products. However, during the period 1995 to 1999, expenditure on the import of food and live animals (Table 4) continued to increase (FMEN, 2001).

Table 4: Importation of food and live animals from 1995 - 1999 (Nigerian naira (N) × 106)

Item 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999
Food and live animals 88 349.9 75 954.6 100 640.3 102 165.1 103 489.9
Source: CBN (1999). US $ 1 = 129.51 Naira in May 2005

2. SOILS AND TOPOGRAPHY

Topography


The geology of Nigeria is dominated by igneous structures that form most of the highlands and hills. The rocks of the basement complex, mainly of igneous origin, are encountered in over 60 % of the surface area. The landforms can simply be classified into highlands, plateaux, hills, plains and river valley systems. The landforms are more deeply dissected in the south than in the northern parts (Udo, 1970). Figure 4 presents dominant land classes while Figure 5 presents a simple relief map of Nigeria.

The topography of the country shows that Nigeria is highest along the eastern border and rises to a maximum of 2,040 m above sea level at Vogel Peak, south of the Benue river. The Jos plateau, that is located close to the centre of the country rises to 1780 m at Sphere hill and 1,698 at Wadi Hill. The Plateau is also the watershed, from which streams flow to Lake Chad and the rivers Niger and Benue.  The land declines steadily northward from the plateau and this area, known as the High Plains of Hausaland, is characterized by a broad expanse of level sandy plains, interspersed by rocky dome outcrops. To the south-west, across the Niger River similar relief is represented in the Yoruba highlands, where the rocky outcrops are surrounded by forest or tall grass and form the major watershed for rivers flowing northwards to the Niger and southwards to the sea.
Elsewhere in the country, lowlands of less than 300m stretch inland from the coast for over 250 km and continue in the trough-like basins of the Niger and Benue rivers. Lowland areas also exist in the Rima and Chad basins at the extreme north-west and north-east of the country respectively. These lowlands are dissected by innumerable streams and rivers flowing in broad sandy valleys.
The low-lying areas are generally below 300 m and these are found in the centre and the south (Iloeje, 2001). The Udi Plateau for instance attains a height of over 300 m, and this seems to break the monotony of the surface in the low lands.

Figure 4: Map showing dominant land classes
[Click to view full image]
Source: Agriculture: Towards 2010 – FAO, Rome 1993.
Figure 5: Map showing simple relief of Nigeria
[Click to view full image]
Source:www:theodora.com/maps

Thus, Nigeria can be divided into:- (1) the high plateau; and (2) the lowlands (Iloeje, 2001) (Figure 6).

 (1) The high plateaux. The three tracks of the Niger-Benue river system cut across the highland to form three blocks, i.e. the central Plateau in the north; the Eastern and North-Eastern highlands in the east; and the western Uplands in the west. It is important to highlight the fact that these highlands correspond roughly with the areas of volcanic rocks and uplifted areas of basement complex rocks. This goes to show that these areas were initially high and were able to resist erosion (Iloeje, 2001).

Based on the above description, the high plateau consists of:

(a) The Northern Central plateau – This plateau as the name suggests lies in the centre of northern Nigeria and covers nearly one-fifth of the area of the country. The surface is generally flat, but it is dotted here and there with some granite hills and ridges. The plateau is made up of two distinct platforms that lie at different levels: (i) the high plains of Hausaland forms the lower step. The average elevation stands at 750 m; (ii) the Jos plateau. Has a higher platform with an elevation of 1 500 to 1 800 m. It has a south-west steep scarp that overlooks the high plains from a height of about 1 600 metres in the north-east, but falls to these plains rather gradually. The highest part is the Shere Hills north-east of Jos where the elevation exceeds 1 650 m above sea level (Iloeje, 2001).

(b) The Eastern and North-eastern highlands – These highlands consist of the Mandara Mountains (1 200 –1 500 m) and the Biu Plateau (600 – 900 m). The Mandara Mountains are a mass of basement complex exposure while the Biu Plateau is of basalt. In eastern Nigeria, the highlands are made up of two big granite spurs that are western prolongations of the Cameroon Mountains into the Cross River Plains (Iloeje, 2001). These spurs are the Obudu Plateau that stands at a height of over 1 200 metres above the general level of the land and the Oban Hills with an average elevation of 1 200 m above sea level.

(c) The Western uplands – They cover an area of about half the size of the North Central Plateau.  Most of the area lies between 300 to 600 m however the Idanre Hills, where the Plateau is highest are about 1 000 m above sea level (Iloeje, 2001).

(2) The lowlands lie mainly in the basins of the major rivers and fall roughly within the areas of sedimentary rocks lying in the basins of sedimentation.

(a) The Sokoto plains in the north-west – These extend over one twentieth of the area of Nigeria and have an average height of 150 m. They are monotonously flat. The main rivers that drain into this area are the Sokoto, Rima and Zamfara. They have flat-floored valleys that are flooded in the wet season only. The water recedes during the dry season and leaves a coating of alluvial soil behind. These seasonally flooded areas are called “fadamas” in Hausa (Iloeje, 2001).

(b) The Niger/Benue trough wrapping round the north-central plateau – This starts from the Sokoto plains in the North-west through Lokoja, and ends near Yola. The Niger/Benue trough is an elongated bow-shaped lowland. It represents a previous arm of the sea, probably an extension of the Atlantic, into which sediments were deposited. Its surface generally lies below 300 m. It has been deeply disserted by erosion into tabular hills that are separated by gorge-like river valleys (Ileoje, 2001).

(c) The Chad Basin in the North-east extremity of the country – It consists of about one-tenth of Nigeria. It is a depressed basin composed of Territory rocks. It has a average elevation of about 45 – 60 m and is separated from the Benue valley by the Biu Plateau. Except for the sand dunes of the Hadejia, the surface is almost flat. These dunes are long narrow sand ridges of about 12 – 30 m high and 275 – 365 m wide and they vary in length between 800 m and 12 km.  As a result of increased rainfall, they have been overgrown by vegetation and are thus fixed in their present position (Ileoje, 2001).

(d) The interior coastal lowlands of Western Nigeria – This area lies west of the Niger. Its boundary is marked in the north by the ridge of the basement complex of the western Highlands; in the South by Quaternary deposits of the coastal margin. Rocks found in this area are Secondary and Tertiary sedimentaries, which dip gently southwards.  The South dipping surface has however, sunk to below 300 m and is cut into blocks by narrow parallel valleys cut by the north-south flowing rivers (Ileoje, 2001).

(e) The lowlands and scarplands of South-eastern Nigeria – The rocks in this area are made of sandstones, shales, clays and coal. With the exception of the coastal areas and the Eastern Highlands it covers the whole of the eastern section of Nigeria. This area is divided into three sub-units (i) The Cross Rive plains, east of Enugu; (ii) The Scarplands that lies west of the longitude of Enugu and (iii) The South-east Coastal Plains that are tertiary rocks and lie south of the Scarplands (Ileoje, 2001).

(f) The Coastal Margins and swamps that lie adjacent to the seas – These run along the coast from east to west in a strip of land below 30 m and are made up of recent deposits of sand, clays and mud. This area can be divided into two (i) the lagoon coast lies in the west where the strip is narrow. Sands predominate and sand-bars cut off east-west lagoons. The Lagos lagoon is partly made up of fresh water from the rivers and partly of sea-water stranded behind a sand-bar. (ii) The Niger Delta which consists mainly of muddy deposits pushed out by the Niger into a relatively tideless salt sea.  The creeks and water channels of the coastland form important fishing grounds and provide highways in this marshy area (Ileoje, 2001).

  1. High Plateau
  1. The north Central Plateau
  2. The Eastern and North-eastern highlands
  3. The Western Uplands
  1. Lowlands
  1. The Sokoto Plains
  2. The Niger/Benue trough
  3. The Chad Basin.
  4. The interior coastal lowlands of western Nigeria
  5. The lowlands and scarplands of south-eastern Nigeria.
  6. The coastlands

Figure 6: Map showing Relief zones of Nigeria
Source: http://www.sas.upenn.edu/African_Studies/Country_Specific/Nigeria.html)

Soils
Soil types in Nigeria are influenced by and follow very broadly, the climatic and vegetational zones of the country. This is expected because the degree of available moisture in the soil is an important factor in soil reactions and fertility and productivity. The soils of the humid tropical forests are quite different from those of the drier forests and the savanna zone, which in turn are different from the savanna zone (Oyenuga, 1967). The major soil types in Nigeria, according to FAO soil taxonomy legends are fluvisols, regosols, gleysols, acrisols, ferrasols, alisols, lixisols, cambisols, luvisols, nitosols, arenosols and vertisols. These soil types vary in their potential for agricultural use (Table 5).

None of the soils was rated as Class 1 with high productivity by the FAO. In-short over 48 % of the Nigerian soils fall into class 4 and 5, which are mainly vertisols, alisols, acrisols, ferrasols and arensol. These soils usually have low productivity due to inadequate moisture retention capacity and low organic matter. Except for the ferrasols, they are the most dominant types found in the northern dry parts of the country.

The most systematic current information on Nigerian soils is based on the reconnaissance soil survey of the Nigeria project whose field-work was completed in 1985. The geology and geomorphological processes that shaped the landforms greatly influenced the soils.

Table 5: Productivity potential of Nigerian soils

Soil Productivity grade

FAO Productivity Classes

Area

   

km2

% of total

High (1)

 

-

-

Good (2)

Fluvisols, Gleysols, Regosols

50.4

5.52

Medium (3)

Lixisols, Cambisols, Luvisols, Nitosols

423.6

46.45

Low (4)

Acrisols, Ferrasols, Alisols, Vertisols

289.2

31.72

Low (5)

Arenosols, Nitosols

148.8

16.32

Source: originally from FAO and reported in Adegbola, S.A. (1979).
An Agricultural Atlas of Nigeria, Oxford, University Press, Oxford

Nigerian soils can be classified into groups made up of four (climatic) zones that are soil associations. The groups are: (i) Northern zone of sandy soils (ii) Interior zone of laterite soils; (iii) Southern belt of forest soils; and (iv) zone of alluvial soils (Oyenuga, 1967; Iloeje, 2001) (Figure 7) and the soil types (classifications) are well distributed among the groups (Adegbola, 1979).

(i) Northern zone of sandy soils: This area lies in the very northern parts of the country. In some areas like the Sahel savanna belt, the soils are true to type, being formed under aridity and by the deposition of sand by the wind. These soils might have been formed from wind-sorted desert sands that accumulated over long periods of time when the Sahara desert encroached several kilometres south of its present limits. The soils of this zone produce much of the groundnut crop, some of the sorghum, cowpeas and large quantities of millet. For instance in Kano, Northern Kaduna, Zamfara and Sokoto states they have fine sandy loam, friable and relatively easy to cultivate soils. The soil is little leached and therefore ideal for groundnut cultivation. Whereas in southern Kuduna is found a mixture of soils that disintegrated from local granite, and loess soils that were brought down by winds from the north. The soil is in fact not sandy.  These soils are the Zaria loam that produces the largest yield of cotton in Nigeria.

Figure 7: Map showing soil zones and types in Nigeria

(ii) Interior zone of laterite soils: This zone is made up of sands and clays. They are grey to black clays poorly drained and seasonally flooded forming the “fadama”. Soil in this zone is deeply corroded, generally sticky and impervious to water and has low fertility. When the virgin forest on them is cleared it reduces the fertility further, thus making available soil of little agricultural value. When the soil is exposed to the surface, it become as hard as brick and for this reason, the soil here is most suitable for road paving and wall construction than for farming. However, not only laterite soils are found in this zone. The Biu Plateau has rich soil that is productive and offers prospects for the expansion of the areas of cotton production.

(iii) Southern belt of forest soils: Soils in this zone broadly represent those of the humid, tropical forest climate zones of the south where the wet season is long, the harmattan season short and forest cover is dense. Local soil types depend largely on parent rock. Where the underlying rocks are granite or clay, the soils is a rich clayey loam. The forest soils yield cocoa, oil palm, rubber and they are of considerable importance in Nigerian agriculture.

(iv) Zone of alluvial soils: These soils are found on the flooded plains of rivers or on deltas, or along the coastal flats. This zone extends from the coastal inland and runs along the valleys of the Niger and the Benue rivers, thus cutting across the vegetational zones. The soils found in this zone do not depend highly on climate and vegetation for their formation. The underlying parent rock is the most important factor in their formation. Soils in this zone are characteristic of fresh-water soil of grey to white sand, grey clay and sandy clay with humic topsoil. Another group consists of brownish to black saline mangrove soils, with a mat of rootlets.

Besides the above classification, Sobulo (1988) reported that Nigerian soils can also be broadly grouped into four major categories for management purposes and these groupings are:-

  1. Soils with a high base saturation under savanna vegetation (grassland) – Alfisols, Inceptisols, Vertisols, Cambisols. These soils are formed from metamorphic, igneous rocks, volcanic and sedimentary parent materials. These parent rocks in return influence the chemical characteristics. These soils are found in the grain producing areas where water is not limiting and could be termed the Grain belt. The soils in the savanna grassland are generally low in organic matter, total nitrogen, and available phosphorus. Soil management in this zone, would involve intensive cultivation provided suitable crop rotation or intercropping is practised.
  2. Soils with a high base saturation under forest vegetation (Semi-arid tropics) – Alfisols, Inceptisols, Gleysols and Cambisols. The soils here have similar parent rock as (1), except for the high rainfall and therefore a higher organic matter.  The nutrient status is very high, about twice or more. The length of cropping can be increased to two years before N and P fertilizer can be limiting. Trace elements are often not limiting on the soils in this zone. The soil in this zone can be easily eroded therefore nutrient losses through soil and water erosion is common. Good crop rotation and the use of mulch assist to control erosion.
  3. Soils under a low base saturation (Humid tropical zone) – Oxisols and Ultisols under forest vegetation.  This zone is confronted with multiple nutrient problems such as soil acidity, high exchangeable Al, very low exchangeable bases, and available micronutrients. Potassium, magnesium and phosphorus are often required to maintain yields but the soils have to be moderately limed to reduce Al toxicity. Crops that are used to low base saturation and low solar radiation such as upland rice, cassava, sweet potato, some grass and pasture legumes should be grown in this zone so as to achieve better utilization of the soil and inputs such as fertilizer.
  4. Soils in the semi-arid zone – Inceptisols, Entisols and Andosols. Soils in this zone are derived from Aeolian sand and are often young soils (Entisols). Vertisols are sometimes found in this zone. The soils in general have a high base status and when saline, they can be reclaimed before use. If irrigation is used good crop yields are achievable.

3. CLIMATE AND AGRO-ECOLOGICAL ZONES

Climate
Nigeria, by virtue of its location, enjoys a warm tropical climate with relatively high temperatures throughout the year and two seasons – the rainy or wet season that lasts from mid- March – November in the South and from May to October in the north; and the dry season that occupies the rest of the year (Oyenuga, 1967). However, in a country like Nigeria, where the temperatures do not fluctuates regularly, constant elements such as relative humidity and rainfall are heavily relied on to differentiate between the season and climatic zones. The climate of the country is influenced by the interaction of two air masses:

(I) the relatively warm and moist tropical marine mass which originates over the Atlantic Ocean and is associated with Southwest winds in Nigeria, and

(II) the relatively cool, dry and relatively stable tropical continental air mass that originates from the Sahara Desert and is associated with the dry, cool and dusty North-East Trades (harmattan).

The seasonal pattern of the south differs from that of the north and the south has four seasons: (i) The long wet season that starts in mid-March and lasts till July is a season of heavy rains and high humidity. Plants and pasture are fresh and green, grasses and weeds grow rapidly and look attractive. This is the planting season. (ii) The short dry season. This is the August break and it starts from July – August and lasts for about one month. (iii) The short wet season. It follows the August break and lasts from September to October. During this period rainfall is not usually heavy compared to the first wet season and the total amount of rainfall is less; and (iv) The long dry or harmattan season which continues from November to mid-March. Harmattan mornings are usually cool and misty, however the mist disappears after sunrise. The afternoons are full of haze due to dust in the air brought by winds from the north. At this period of the year grasses die off and leaves of some trees turn brown and later fall ( Oyenuga, 1967; Ileoje, 2001).

In the north, the long dry season starts earlier and ends later. Here there is nothing like the August break, therefore the two wet seasons become one. Therefore two seasons are prominent – a long dry season that spans from October to April, and a wet season for the remaining five months. (i) The long dry season: there is lack of rainfall and the dry conditions that prevail cause cracks to develop on clay soils. However, this season is welcomed because the nights are cool and the afternoon haze helps to wade off the sun’s heat; and (ii) the wet season that is ushered in by frequent storms. This is the planting season in the north.

Rainfall varies from place to place and from season to season. In the wet season, the full effect of the tropical maritime air mass is the main reason that brings rainfall, while in the dry season the rainfall is less. The total annual rainfall decreases from the south to the north. The southern two-thirds of the country have double peak rainfall while the northern third has a single peak. Seasonal distribution and annual rainfall for selected towns are presented in Figure 8 and Table 6, respectively. For example Brass has 379 cm, Jos 143 cm, Sokoto 71 cm, and Maiduguri 63 cm (Iloeje, 2001).

Figure 8. Total Annual Rainfall

July is the middle of the wet season and the relative humidity is usually high because of the warm wet air that prevails. The humidity is over 80 % in the South and never goes below 60 % in the north. Over 80 % of the rains fall within the wet months of April – September. In the South the figure is above 70 % and in the north nearly 100 % of the rains are during these months (Table 6).

Table 6. Seasonal distribution of rainfall in selected towns in Nigeria (North to South)

Towns
Lat. N
April - September October - March
 

Amount

% of rainfall

Amount

% of rainfall

Maiduguri

11o 51’

63.3 cm

100

0.0 cm

0

Jos

9o 52’

135.1 cm

96

7.9 cm

4

Enugu

6o 27’

141.2 cm

78

39.9 cm

22

Brass

4o 19’

270.5 cm

71

108.4 cm

29

Source : Iloeje, N.P. (2001).

Temperature also varies from place to place and from season to season. It has been observed that there are considerable contrasts between the coastal areas and the interior, as well as between the high plateau and the lowlands. On the plateau, the mean annual temperature varies between 21 0C and 27 0C. In the Jos area, temperatures are between 20 0C and 250 C. On the lowlands such as the Sokoto Plains, the Chad Basin and the Niger-Benue lowlands, the mean annual temperature is 27 0C. The coastal fringes have lower means than the interior. It appears therefore that altitude and proximity to the seas determine to a large extent the distribution of temperature in Nigeria. Generally, temperatures are high throughout the year because Nigeria lies within the tropics and the mean monthly figure could go above 27 0C, while daily maximum temperatures can go between beyond 35 0C – 38 0C depending on the location (Iloeje, 2001).

Figure 9 presents mean annual temperature distribution.

Figure 9. Mean annual temperature distribution

In general while there is hardly any dry season in the extreme southern tip of the country, the wet season hardly lasts for more than three months in the north-eastern part. Similarly annual rainfall totals range from 2,500 mm in the south to less than 400 mm in parts of the extreme north (FMEN, 2001).

Agro-ecological zones
A number of classifications of Nigerian vegetation have been published sine the nineteen-fifties. The development of categories reflects changing perceptions of the significance and value of such classifications. Combined effects of temperature, humidity and rainfall, and particularly, the variations that occur in the rainfall that govern the natural vegetation zones exerts a major influence on the types of indigenous plants that grow or the exotic types that can be introduced successfully into the country. Oyenuga (1967) reported that the humid, tropical forest zone of the south that has longer rains is capable of supporting a number of plantation crops such as cocoa, oil palm, rubber, coffee, cotton and staple crops like, yam, cassava, cocoyam, sweet potatoes, melon, groundnut, rice maize and cowpeas. However, in some parts of the east and many areas near the coast, the high rainfall has led to badly leached soils and severe erosion in some places.

The North with its lower rainfall and shorter rainy season consists of savanna land, and this represents 80 % of the vegetation zones of the country. The savanna land forms an excellent natural habitat for a large number of grazing livestock such as cattle, goats, sheep, horses, camels, and donkeys.

The natural vegetation zones resulted from the interaction of the climate, humidity and rainfall (Oyenuga, 1967), and soils (Iloeje, 2001). These factors have been modified by human activities and man’s pattern of land use (Oyenuga 1967; Iloeje, 2001). Based on the above, Oyenuga (1967) classified Nigeria into nine (9) agro-ecological zones viz:- (i) The mangrove forest and coastal vegetation, (ii) the freshwater swamp communities, (iii) the tropical high forest zone, (iv) the derived Guinea savanna with relict forest, (v) the Southern Guinea savanna zone, (vi) The northern Guinea savanna zone, (vii) The Jos plateau, (viii) The Sudan savanna, and (ix) The Sahel savanna. However, Iloeje, (2001) grouped the country into (A) forests and (B) savanna zones. These two major zones were further sub-divided into three zones each such as (A) Forests that consist of (i) salt-water swamp, (ii) fresh-water swamp, (iii) high forest; and (B) Savanna zone that consist of (i) guinea savanna (ii) Sudan savanna, and (iii) Sahel savanna (Figure 10).

Figure 10. Vegetation Zones of Nigeria
[Click to view full image]

The mangrove forest and coastal vegetation: This occupies the coastal areas and consists of tidal swamps, interspersed with numerous creeks and lagoons.  The mangrove swamp is noted for the mangrove species of trees (Rhizophora) that dominate the swamp and to a much less extent by Conocarpus erectus and Laguncularia racemosa (white mangrove). Among the Rhizophora spp. Rhizophora racemosa dominates, occupying an estimated 99 % of the entire mangrove area. The coastal swamp area is not widely cultivated except for swamp rice in places where they are stabilized and non-saline.

The freshwater swamp communities: This area which originally occupied 18 130 km2 lies immediately inland of the mangrove swamp but on a slightly higher ground. The lagoons or the rivers that overflow their banks in the wet season supply it with fresh water because the area is low lying, therefore it is flooded with rain water and lies under rain for sometimes eight or nine months of the year. The periodical flooding experienced gradually deposits new layers of alluvial soils on the surface of the land, a deposit that leads to the formation of more solid ground behind the swamp, where we find the beginning of the rain forest. This zone consists of a mixture of trees. Important among the vegetation of this zone are the various palm and fibre plants such as Raphia spp., Raphia vinifera, the wine palm and Raphia hookeri, the roof-mat palm. They are used for thatching mats and for providing rafter, poles and stiff piassava fibre for the production of brooms. Leaves of the pandanus palm (Pandanus candelabrum) are used for preparing sleeping mats and baskets. Fishing and fibre-making are the important products of the fresh-water swamp community.

The tropical high forest zone: This zone is the major source of timber for all large constructional and cabinet making timber. Of all the zones it contains the most valuable species of vegetation. However due to human activities, this one-time forested area has been drastically reduced. Bush fallows, villages and farms are found scattered throughout the zone. Presently the drier end of its inland side is becoming reduced to derived guinea savanna because of felling and clearings. In the humid rain forest are found economic cash crops such as oil palm, (Elaeis guineensis), cocoa (Theobroma cacao), Rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) banana/plantain (Musa spp.) and cola nut (Cola nitida). Also found are some principal staple food crops such as yam, cocoyams, sweet potato, maize, rice, groundnut, cowpeas and beans as well as a number of fruits. This zone is also good for sylviculture. A number of timber trees such as the African mahogany (Khaya ivorensis and K. grandifoliola), the scented sapele wood (Entandrophragma cylindricum) and iroko (Chlorophora excelsa) to mention but three are found in this zone. This zone therefore is very important in terms of food production and timber for construction and cabinet making (Oyenuga, 1967).

The derived Guinea savanna with relict forest: This was originally the drier part of the high forest. Due to bush burning and overgrazing, cultivation and hunting activities over a long period in the zone, the high forest trees were destroyed and the forest that used to exist is now replaced with a mixture of grasses and scattered trees. However, along the streams and in wet low-lying areas were surface water accumulates there are still some traces of forests. The Guinea savanna is characterized by grasses such as Pennisetum, Andropogon, Panicum, Chloris, Hyparrhenia, Paspalum and Melinis. These tall grasses are characteristic of the Guinea savanna proper.

The Guinea Savanna: This zone consists of the larger part of the savanna zone and is sometimes divided into the southern Guinea savanna and northern Guinea savanna. It is the broadest vegetation zone in the country and it occupies almost half of its area. It is located in the middle of the country, extends southwards to southern Nigeria and pushes northward beyond Zaria (Figure 10). It covers an area that has 100 – 150 cm of annual rainfall and where the wet season lasts for 6 - 8 months. The false balsam Copaiba (Daniellia oliveri), used for carving mortars and pestles for pounding yam, Terminalia, Lophira, Afzeila, Daniellia and Vitex, Khaya senegalensis (the poor mahogany) are the species found in the southern Guinea savanna. In the northern guinea savanna species such as Isoberlinia doka and I. tomentosa form the bulk of the scattered woodland. Also found are locust bean tree (Parkia filicoidea), shea butter tree (Butyrospermum parkii) and mangoes (Mangifera indica). Comparatively, there are fewer trees in the northern Guinea savanna than in the southern Guinea savanna and the trees are not as tall as those found in the southern Guinea savanna. Most of the tall grasses found in the derived Guinea savanna, are also found in the Guinea savanna, however, they are less luxuriant. The appearance of this zone differs from season to season. During the rainy season, the whole zone is green and covered with tall grasses that grow and reach maturity rapidly and thus become fibrous and tough. In the dry season they tend to die and disappear and one can see for kilometres. This clearing is due to several periodical bush-burning that occurs during the dry season between November and April, carried out to either assist in farm clearance or hunting.

The Sudan savanna: This zone is chiefly associated with groundnuts, sorghum and millet cultivation. Grasses found in this zone are not generally as tall, coarse or thick on the ground as those found in the Guinea savanna zone. Here there is continuous grass cover of the short and feathery grasses on a large scale. The grass vegetation is interspersed with farms and thick bush trees such as shea butter tree (Butyrospermum parkii) and Acacia albida. The genus Acacia and Combretum, especially Combretum micranthum are well represented and prolific in the Sudan savanna zone. Also found in the zone are locust bean tree (Parkia filicoidea), tamarind tree (Tamarindus indica) and mango (Mangifera indica). A large portion of this zone falls within the tsetse fly free belt of West Africa and it is excellent for the rearing and breeding of ruminant livestock (cattle, goats, sheep, donkeys, horses and camels). The nomadic Fulani roam about this zone in search of fodder and water for their livestock.

The Sahel savanna: Occupies about 18 130 km2 of the extreme northeast corner of Nigeria and is the last vegetation zone of the savanna type between the Sahara and the northern frontier of the Sudan savanna (Figure 10). The annual rainfall is low and the rainy season lasts between three to four months. Here the vegetation is not only sparse but the grasses are very short. This zone is characterized by plants such as Cenchrus biflorus, and Acacia raddiana. The shrubs that are predominantly scattered in the zone are African myrrh (Commiphora africana) and Leptadenia spartum. As a rule this zone is not cultivated without irrigation. The people found in this zone are the nomadic herdsmen, and they are careful not to burn the grass found because sparse as it is it provides the only pasture available for their grazing livestock.

Montane vegetation: There is no true montane type vegetation in Nigeria, but slight variations in the prevailing plant cover introduced by relief. For instance the Jos plateau, the Bauchi Highland and the Adamawa Plateau lie in the guinea savanna zone, however, the grasses found on these highlands are shorter and the trees are fewer than at lower level. The Fulani who live in great numbers in the area turn the available fields into good pasture for their grazing animals. Figure 11 presents photographs from some agro-ecological zones.

Cattle rearing in Nigeria.
Guinea savanna towards the end of the rainy season
Guinea savanna view just after the first rain.
Rainforest from the air in Delta/Edo States
Market gardening on the Jos Plateau
Village settlement on the Jos Plateau.
Figure 11: Photographs from some agro-ecological zones (Source: Ileoje, 2001)

The main constraints on feed resources in all the zones are the destruction of perennial tree cover for firewood, bush fires caused by hunters; livestock rearers and overgrazing. These man-made constraints often lead to serious degradation of the pastoral resources and in some cases to an irreversible process of desertification, especially in the Sahel zone. The sub-humid zone (SHZ) has a high potential for ruminant production because of high rainfall and vast land area for forage production. However, the SHZ contains only 19.59 per cent of the total national livestock (Otchere and Nuru 1988). This low percentage of total livestock unit in the Nigerian SHZ is attributed partly to tsetse infestation and high humidity.


4. RUMINANT LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION SYSTEMS

Main production systems
Ruminants have a greater effect on ecosystems than other animal species. In Nigeria ruminant livestock are numerous and provide substantial quantities of animal protein. However, their production is based on age-old husbandry systems, which need to be gradually modified in order to meet the needs of consumers. In Nigeria, cattle, goats and sheep production systems are predominantly traditional or village systems; nomadic or pastoral systems; mixed farming and the peri-urban and modern ruminant livestock husbandry. In general production and management systems vary from free range in less populated areas to year round confinement and cut and carry feeding of grass and browse in densely populated areas.

Traditional or extensive or Village systems
Traditionally managed stock is over 85 % for all species (Tewe and Bokanga, 2001) and ruminant livestock under the extensive system rely on natural grass and forage legumes for subsistence. The traditional production systems include scavenging, cut-and-carry production systems; seasonal tethering, fattening and compound dairying. In short the livestock sub-sector is dominated by traditional systems of production, processing and marketing. 
Scavenging:It is the most extreme low-input management system used by most subsistence farmers. The animals are allowed to roam freely in the villages and their environs, scavenging food scraps and crop residues. There is no notice taken of mating, pregnancy, disease or anything of relevance to the survival of the animal. In short these animals are not subjected to any routine management practices. The subsistence farmer keeps them on a side line operation to his crops and also as a hobby.
Cut-and-carry method/Seasonal tethering: As the population increased the extensive grazing systems are now becoming disruptive to crop production and new by-laws in the nineteen-seventies required that animals be tethered and fed by the cut-and carry method. Under this system the farmer houses his stock by seasonal tethering of individual animals in the compound or in areas where forages are available. These forages are harvested and fed to them. This system is carried out where the farmer has insufficient land and there are strict village laws against scavenging. The number of animals is usually small. For example among the Gbari south west of Kaduna, Bunaji cattle are bought from pastoralists and then stocked out throughout the dry season in systematic rotation so as manure to the fields in preparation for the coming wet season. Near Badagry, a similar system is used with Keteku to manure coconut plantations. This system is often used in conjunction with fattening for seasonal markets and the system is very common in most areas in southern Nigeria.
Fattening:Due to seasonal fluctuation in the availability of forage, most farmers buy animals from the north and build shelters in the village where the animals are stall fed throughout the year. The animals may be fattened for a short period of six months to take advantage of seasonal variations in stock prices. This system is promoted by government agencies in preparation for festive seasons.
Compound dairying:In this system milking animals are kept in the compound to supply the family with liquid milk while the excess is processed into other dairy products. This system has long been practiced among the Hausas and was first described in Kano in the nineteenth century. The transhumant Fulani pastoralists who generally take away most of their herd in the dry season will leave some animals in the homesteads to supply milk to their family. These animals are either stall-fed or grazed close to the compounds in the day and confined in the night.

Nomadic or pastoral systems
The traditional grazing pattern is that at the end of the dry season the animals are either near permanent villages feeding on dry forage and browse or far enough south to find range and water but not so far as to encounter the tsetse fly. The migration north begins and continues as long as the grass ahead is as green as the pastures at hand. When the northernmost grass and water are consumed (usually in November or December), there is a slow movement southwards to the home range, where there should be crop stubble and a full growth of grass to carry the animals through the dry season (Clyburn 1974). Traditionally, the different clans or ethnic groups usually have their respective grazing areas, and, depending on their environment, they also tend to specialize in certain animals. For example, the Fulani in northern Nigeria are known for their cattle, while the Tuareg, who live north of the Fulani, rely more on camels. In times of drought all the herders tend to shift further south than usual.

Herding is a monumental task for the Fulani who are always trying to get the best grazing condition for their animals. Contrary to popular belief, moving with animals is not the delight of the pastoralists. The migrant Fulani in Nigeria move because they have no choice (Otchere et al., 1985). A survey (Iro, undated) reported that three-quarters of the mobile Fulani indicated that herding is not only toilsome, it is becoming more strenuous. Nevertheless, about ten percent of the Fulani, mostly those who are near dams and grazing reserves, say herding is becoming easier. Ninety-seven percent, including those who say herding is becoming less laborious, prefer raising animals within the precinct of the homestead. In general terms the pastoral systems practiced by the Fulani herders fall into three groups – Exclusively pastoralists; transhumant pastoralists and agro-pastoralists.

Exclusive pastoralists:These are mainly livestock producers who do not grow crops and therefore depend on the sales of live animals and dairy products to buy grains, other food items and other necessities. Most pastoralists under this system may move very long distances every year. It is a popular assumption that they wander from place to place without any logic; in general they have set migration routes and often long-standing arrangements with farmers to make use of their crop residues. It is only when there is drought, a failure of the pasture or the spread of diseases that they diverge from their existing patterns. The pastoralists in the Niger-Benue valley migrate very short distances between the wet and dry seasons. They use the same grazing areas and routes each year with the thatching on houses at each location repaired annually. Most of the pastoralists spend the dry season in the River Niger floodplains and only move to higher grounds before the flood rises during the rains.

Transhumant pastoralists: Transhumance pastoralists in the drier north of the country rear a very high proportion of the cattle herd and many sheep and goats. Pastoralists under this production system have permanent homestead and base. Their animals depend on the natural forage legumes and grasses for subsistence but these are usually unavailable in the dry season. They move in response to seasonal changes in the quality of grazing and the tsetse fly challenges. The travelling unit is normally made of a common herd owned by close male relatives, father and son. Grain and other basic needs are purchased from sale proceeds of live animals (surplus male sheep, goats and cattle) by the men or selling of milk and other dairy products by the women in the local markets. They grow crops mainly for domestic use rather than for the market. The male folk take away the majority of the herd in search of grazing, however they leave older members of the community with the nucleus of lactating women. They return in the wet season to assist with crop cultivation. They do not have traditional grazing rights and often move to the south during the dry season to fatten their animals for sale (Aregheore, 2001). The animals move from their arid home range to the wetter southern parts where vegetation remains green and suitable for grazing.

Agro-pastoralists: These are semi-settled pastoralists and they are found in many parts of northern Nigeria. They cultivate areas sufficient to feed their families from their own cereal production. In Bornu most pastoralists fall into this category. They hold land rights, use their own or hired labour to cultivate land and grow crops such as yams and cassava in addition to the staple cereals such as sorghum, millet and maize. In the system, the average herd of cattle is small compared to other pastoral systems, because they no longer rely solely on cattle and the finite grazing area around their environs that can be reached in a day will limit herd size. Most pastoralists in this system have preferences for particular breeds.

Mixed farming (Integrated Crop/Livestock):
This is a system conducted by households or enterprises where crop cultivation and livestock rearing are more or less integrated components of a single farming system. Increasing urbanization in Nigeria is cause for alarm, however if this is coupled with income growth it will provide a growing market for livestock products for rural as well as peri-urban farmers. Mixed farming exists in many forms depending on external and internal factors. External factors are weather patterns, market prices, political stability, technological developments, etc. Internal factors relate to local soil characteristics, composition of the family and farmers' ingenuity. Even pastoralists practise a form of mixed farming since their livelihood depends on the management of different feed resources and animal species. For example, sedentary Fulani in Futh and the Mambilia plateau in Adamawa practice mixed farming. Furthermore, arable farming peoples like the Kanuri, Hausa, Borgu, Waja, Kibba, Chamba, Kaka and Mambilla often rear cattle and other animals and produce their own manure. With the rapid changes now taking place ethnic groups which were traditionally arable farmers are ready to acquire cattle and pastoralists are increasing their arable farming.

Mixed farming is one of the more subtle qualitative changes that have taken place within local systems of Agriculture in Nigeria (Bourn, et al., 1994). For example, the marked reduction in pastoral nomads; the widespread sedentarisation of pastoralists and their adoption of crop cultivation in addition to keeping livestock; the uptake of animal husbandry and fattening of livestock by arable farmers; and the utilization of crop residues by livestock farmers in exchange for dairy products and/or manure (Van Raay, 1975; Bourn, et al., 1994) are all indicative of a progressive and widespread trend towards mixed farming (FAO, 1983; and McIntyre et al., 1992). Mixed farming is firmly established in Nigeria as a production system and the further integration of livestock production within local farming systems will definitely become one of the major strategic goals of livestock development in Nigeria (Bourn, et al., 1994). Mixed farming is practiced in almost all agro-ecological zones of Nigeria; from rainforests to the arid North. The principal objectives of this system are three fold: (i) complementary benefit from an optimum mixture of crops and livestock; (ii) Spreading income and risks over both crops and livestock production, and (iii) scope to adjust crop/livestock ratio to social and economic needs and opportunities. Most retirees from government services embrace mixed farming and the interest is growing because it uses space more efficiently and spreads risks more uniformly. This process is now firmly established in Nigeria and the further integration of livestock production with local farming systems is destined to become one of the major strategic goals of livestock development.

Peri-urban and modern ruminant livestock husbandry
This system could be referred to as the commercial or intensive production system. Wealthy urban businessmen, wealthy Fulani and government officials practice this system. These types of farms which were found only on the periphery of major towns in northern and central Nigeria are also found today in the south of the country. The rich individuals who own these farms capitalize on the potential of animals as investment, source of milk and meat for their family and also a status symbol. In this system, a farmer may decide to have only cattle or cattle with small ruminants inclusive. Trained personnel are hired and expected routine management practices carried out in most modern ranching operations are also seen in these farmers. In this type of intensive production system the use of crop residues and agricultural by-products are effectively and economically combined with grazing

Ruminant Livestock
Livestock play a very important role in Nigerian agriculture contributing about 12.7% of the total agricultural GDP (CBN 1999). Nigeria is one of the four leading livestock producers in Sub-Sahara. In 1990 the livestock population comprised about 14 million cattle, 23 million goats and 13 million sheep (RIM 1990) however these figures have since increased to 15.2 million cattle, 28 million goats and 23 million sheep (see Table 7a below, FAO, 2006). Other ruminant livestock species of economic importance are asses, horses and camels. Accurate statistics on livestock production and marketing are not easy to obtain and therefore, detailed projections of the supply and demand of the livestock sub-sector may be estimates (Table 7a); however data for meat and milk production, live animal imports and milk/milk product imports are given in Table 7b (from FAO database, 2006). It is noted that, while beef and veal, goat and game meat production have gradually increased over this period, the production of sheep meat has doubled from 1995 to 2004. Large numbers of live cattle, sheep and goats are imported as well as various milk products (to a value of US$ 250 M in 2003). 

Table 7a. Data on ruminant livestock population

Livestock species

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000