Poster |
Integration
of Beef Cattle and King Grass
with Existing Crop Production in Upland Agro-Ecological Zone P.C. Paat, D. Polakitan , S.K. Pajow, and
J.G. Kindangen ABSTRACT
INTRODUTION In recent years, The important problems of raising cattle in small scale cropping area are as follows: (1) competition of using the cultivated land for crop and cattle. (2) low quality and quantity feeds because of its dependence to native grasses and by-products, and (3) lack of information on livestock raising aand feeding management. Therefore, the objectives of this adaptive research are to study the productivity and economics of King grass planted on the border of crop area. METHODOLOGY An on-farm research was conducted in Tondegesan North Sulawesi from June to December 2000. Six farmers (each farmer has minimum of 0.5 ha of crop land and 3 AU of cattle), were involved in the study. King grass was planted on 1000 m2 on the border of corn and ground-nut area. The first harvest was done after 70 days and succeeding harvests were done at 45 days interval. By using trend monitoring design (Astuti 1981) the growth of grasses in initial phase was observed at 9 sampling plots and 2 points of time period. An initial feeding trial was conducted using 16 adult female cattle. Eight (8) heads were fed with conventional feeds consisting of corn straw, corn husk and native grasses (control group) and the rest were fed with King grass substituting 40% of the conventional feeds. The body weight gain was measured every 14 days using the weight band. Cattle were treated with ecto and endo parasites at the start of the study. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONKing grass Productivity In Boyongbong West Java, Sajimin et al. (1999) reported that when King grass was intercropped with gamal, it supplied 4900 or 5100 g/m2 to the animals. This is much higher compared to the amount obtained when it was planted only on the border area of a crop land. Results of the initial feeding trial showed that the average daily gain of cattle fed with King grass was significantly higher than those of the control (14,017 vs 600 g/head/day). The following figure shows that during the plow seaon in September to December 2000, the weight gain of cattle but not those with 40% King grass supplementation.
Socio-economic Analysis Partial gross-margin analysis (Soekartawi, 1989) at 115 days showed that planting King grass on 1.000 m2 area harvested twice has a yield of Rp 1,090,000. At the same time, during dry season, groundnut planted on 3,550 m2 yield only Rp 376,798 for 120 days cultivation. REFFERENCES Astuti, M. 1981. Rancangan Percobaan dan Analisis Statistik II. Fakultas Peternakan Universitas Gajah Mada, Yogyakarta. Diwyanto, K. dan E. Masbulan. 2001. Pengembangan Sistem Agribisnis Peternakan Ramah Lingkungan, Kasus Integrasi Sapi di Lahan Sawah. Makalah pada Apresiasi Teknis Program Litkaji CLS. Puslitbangnak Bogor. Otonomi Daerah. Balai Pengkajian Teknologi Pertanian Palu – Pusat Penelitian Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian – Bogor. pp. 685- 694 Sajimin, Prawiradiputra, B.R. dan M. Panjaitan. 1999. Integrasi tanaman pakan pada sistem usahatani di Kecamatan Bayongbong Kabupaten Garut. Jurnal Ilmu Ternak dan Veteriner, Vo. 4 no. 4 , Puslitnak Bogor, pp. 251-256 Soekartawi, A. Soehardo, J.L. Dillon dan J.B. Hardaker. 1989. Ilmu Usahatani dan Penelitian Pengembangan Petani Kecil. UI Press, Jakarta |