Forage for Beef Fattening
in Coconut Plantation
in Southern Thailand
Chaisang Phaikaew1 and Somsak
Poathong2
1Forage Research Section, Animal Nutrition Division, DLD,
Bangkok 10400, Thailand
2Petchaburi Animal Nutrition Research Center, Cha-am, Petchaburi,
76120, Thailand
ABSTRACT
In Southern Thailand, almost 44,000
ha of land is devoted to coconut plantation which has the potential
to be utilized for cattle raising. At To-hem village, Takbai District,
Narathiwat Province, there are 60 small farmers who earned twice as
much of what a regular farmer earns from 4 to10 beef fattening cattle.
Roughage which has been fed to animal came from improved pasture under
coconut plantation such as Humidicola (Brachiaria humidicola), Purple
guinea (Panicum maximum TD58), Ruzi (Brachiaria ruziziensis), Verano
stylo (Stylosanthes hamata cv. Verano), Stylo 184 (Stylosanthes guianensis
CIAT 184) and Desmanthus (Desmanthus virgatus). Farmers earned a total
of 24,800 to 62,000 baht/farm/year from beef fattening. The high cost
of concentrate and lack of calves for fattening are limiting factors
to expand beef fattening at To-hem village.
INTRODUCTION
To-hem village, Takbai District, Narathiwat Province is located south
of Thailand. The total area of the village is about 750 ha and it is estimated
that 270 ha or 36 % of the total area is planted to coconut. About 100
farmers are raising livestock that consist of beef cattle, buffalo, pig
and poultry. Coconut plantations cover almost 44,000 ha while para rubber
plantations covers 1,650,000 ha which could be used for pasture production
(Office of Agricultural Economics 1997). Farming practices are still of
a monoculture type with pure stands of para rubber and coconut. Large
areas under plantation are not well utilized and remain idle. In the face
of increasing demand for food idle or barren lands must be put into use.
One appropriate approach is to plant improved pastures, and raise cattle
along with rubber and coconut production (Reynolds 1995). From this type
of crop livestock integration, the plantation owner would earn additional
income from sales of livestock. There are indirect advantages from crop-livestock
system, in the form of soil fertility improvement in the plantation by
adding manure from cattle grazing on the area. (Narathiwat Animal Nutrition
Research Center 2000) Government research center has started beef fattening
program since 1997. Sixty farmers joined this program with 277 beef fattening
in 2001.
Forage species used and utilization
Feed resources in most beef fattening enterprise under coconut plantation
are weeds and native grasses growing in the area. The most common native
pastures species growing under coconut plantation in Thailand are Paspalum
conjugatum (Sour grass), Axonopus compressus (Carpet grass),
Imperata cylindrica (Cogon), Ottochloa nodosa (Slender panic),
Microtegium cilratum, Desmodium ovalifolium, Chrysopogon
orientalis and Eremochloa ciliaris (Manidool 1983) All of
these species produce very low yields. Government research center has
contacted local farmers in coconut area to established improved pastures
for beef fattening. Humidicola and Ruzi grasses are the most common species
grown under coconut in Ban Toeham village. But Purple guinea grass is
becoming popular particularly in this village where they were observed
to produce more dry matter yields (23 ton/ha) than Humidicola or Ruzi
grasses (Narathiwat ANRC 2000). Verano stylo are widely used in mixture
with Ruzi grass. However, Stylo 184 and Desmanthus are initially used
in order to increase quality of forage.
Government research center has contacted local farmers
in coconut area at To-hem village to established improved pasture consist
of Brachiaria humidicola, mixed pasture (Ruzi grass + Verano
stylo), Panicum maximum TD58, Stylosanthes guianensis
CIAT 184 and Desmanthus virgatus (Table 1).
During dry season, silage and urea-treated rice straw
are widely used for beef fattening. Most silage is made from Humidicola,
Purple guinea and Ruzi grasses prepared during the wet season. Manure
and inorganic fertilizer were used after cutting in order to increase
the yield of improved pastures. Purple guinea grass has been grown under
irrigation system by 5 farmers in coconut plantation, while Desmanthus
and Stylo 184 has been grown by 5 farmers aimed at increasing the quality
of forage in order to decrease the utilization of concentrate feed.
Table 1. Utilization of improved pasture
under coconuts in To-hem Village, 2000
|
| No |
Species |
area |
Utilization |
| |
|
(ha) |
Cut and
carry |
Grazing |
Silage |
| 1 |
Brachiaria
humidicola |
9.1 |
X |
X |
X |
| 2 |
Panicum
maximum TD58 |
0.8 |
X |
- |
X |
| 3 |
Mixed pasture(
ruzi and hamata stylo) |
3.5 |
X |
X |
X |
| 4 |
Stylosanthes
guianensis CIAT 184 |
0.6 |
X |
- |
- |
| 5 |
Desmanthus
virgatus |
0.2 |
X |
- |
- |
Source: Narathiwat ANRC, 2000
Fresh grasses from approximately 3,200.
Cattle fattening in coconut plantation
Sixty farmers raised 4 to 10 heads of cattle for fattening at To-hem village.
The Thai crossbred of Charolais and Brahman beef cattle were used with
an average initial live weight of 250 kg which costs 12,000 baht/head.
Cattle is fattened under coconut using roughages from improved pasture,
silage and urea-treated rice straw, with concentrate supplement at 1%
of body weight. After 150 days of fattening period, cattle are sold at
the price of 20,000 baht/head. The farmers earned an income of 24,800
to 62,000 baht/farm/year from the sales of fattened cattle (Table 2).
| Table 2. Economic
returns from cattle fattening in coconut plantation |
| Number of animal |
4 to 10 heads/farm |
| Fattening period |
150 days |
| Initial weight |
250 kg |
| Final weight |
400 kg |
| Purchased price of cattle |
12,000 baht/head |
| Sale price of cattle |
20,000 baht/head |
| Concentrate supplement |
1,800 baht/head |
| Profit |
6,200 baht/head |
Source: Narathiwat ANRC, 2000
Profit: Excludes cost of roughage and labor
CONCLUSION
Planting forages for cattle fattening under coconut plantation
at To-hem village has shown that farmers obtained better income from coconut
and cattle than from coconut alone. Suitable shade tolerant pasture species
should be grown under coconuts. More studies on cost/ benefit ratio should
be done.
REFERENCES
Manidool, C.1983. Pasture under coconut in Thailand.
Misc. paper in Seminar on Recent Advances in Pasture Research and Development
in Asian Countries. Aug. 1983 Khon Kaen Univ. Thailand.
Narathiwat Animal Nutrition Research Center 2000. Annual
Report Year 2000. Animal Nutrition Division. Department of Livestock
Development. Ministry of Agriculture and Co-operatives.
Office of Agricultural Economics. 1997. Agriculture
Statistics of Thailand Crop Year 1996/1997. Ministry of Agriculture
and Cooperatives.
Reynolds, S.G. 1995. Pastures- Cattle- coconut Systems.
FAO. Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific (RAPA) Bangkok, Thailand.
668 pp.
|