| The challenges of sustainable rural finance
service provision seem daunting if not, in many countries,
insurmountable. One way to address this difficult situation
is through the linking of formal and mostly non-formal development
finance institutions, which have natural complementarities
in service provision. On the one hand, formal financial intermediaries
(FFIs) often possess a wide range of financial services; they
have extensive infrastructures and systems; they have access
to capital and more opportunities to diversify their portfolio.
However, FFIs are further removed from rural clients, lack
the necessary skills to analyze credit risks of rural clients,
are not familiar with local culture and market conditions,
and their systems may be inflexible making it difficult to
innovate. On the other hand, development finance intermediaries
are closer to rural clients, are more flexible and innovative,
and know local conditions well. Often however, they do not
possess a wide range of financial services, lack the necessary
infrastructure to serve a dispersed clientele, are faced with
very concentrated portfolios, and have at best limited access
to adequate capital. Hence there appears to be much scope
for linking and strategic partnering of the formal and non-formal
financial sectors that could result in expanded access to
rural financial services.
|