ARCHIVES OF DEBATE, CONFERENCE 5
Can agricultural biotechnology help to reduce hunger and increase food
security in developing countries?
Moderated log files from the email discussions are available here, by subject or by date. They can also be retrieved by email, as well as by month: November and December.
Archives November 2000
Archives December 2000
Posted messages by subject :
1. First contribution to Conference 5 // Nigeria
2. Debate on biotech, hunger
3. Food at the corner
4. Third World hunger: an alibi for GMO development
5. A view from a Biotechnologist
6. Third World hunger: an alibi for GMO development
7. Re: Third World hunger: an alibi for GMO development
8. A general note regarding third world agriculture
9. Re: A general note regarding third world agriculture
10. Food security // technology transfer
11. Vitamin A deficiency // GM rice
12. Re: A general note regarding third world agriculture
13. Re: Vitamin A deficiency // GM rice
14. Pros and Cons of GE for the poor
15. Vitamin A deficiency // GM rice
16. Biotechnology and hunger/food security
17. GM rice and reasoned debate
18. Re: Vitamin A deficiency // GM rice
19. Re: Biotechnology and hunger/food security
20. Re: Vitamin A deficiency // GM rice
21. Re: Vitamin A deficiency // GM rice
22. When and why to use Biotech ?
23. Politics and science
24. Re: Biotechnology and hunger/food security
25. Re: Vitamin A deficiency // GM rice
26. Re: Biotechnology and hunger/food security
27. GMOs- potential negative effects in developing countries
28. Six points about transgenic crops
29. GM technology in developed world to feed developing countries
30. Re: Biotechnology and hunger/food security
31. Developing countries to develop their own biotechnology
32. Transfer of knowledge behind biotechnology
33. Golden Rice and "silver bullets"
34. Re: Six points about transgenic crops
35. Re: Six points about transgenic crops
36. Why try biotechnology products in fight against hunger ?
37. Private industry and the poorer countries
38. Re: Private industry and the poorer countries
39. Re: Private industry and the poorer countries
40. Hunger/poverty biotech debate - Mixed feelings
41. Re: Private industry and the poorer countries
42. Economic problems in general
43. Can biotech (versus Will biotech) help food security
44. Re: Private industry and the poorer countries
45. Re: Economic problems in general
46. Re: Private industry and the poorer countries
47. Re: Economic problems in general
48. Two solutions on route to food security
49. Re: Private industry and the poorer countries
50. Re: Two solutions on route to food security
51. The role of genetic improvement
52. Environmental risks are important for third world food security too
53. Priority setting
54. Sub-Saharan Africa
55. Re: Economic problems in general
56. Re: Private industry and the poorer countries
57. Re: Two solutions on route to food security
58. Re: Environmental risks are important for.....
59. Re: Environmental risks are important for.....
60. What are the causes of lagging productivity ?
61. Re: Environmental risks are important for.....
62. Re: Environmental risks are important for.....
63. Re: What are the causes of lagging productivity ?
64. The value of new genotypes
65. Availability, Access and Patents
66. Can biotechnology overcome major constraints ?
67. Re: Availability, Access and Patents
68. Re: Can biotechnology overcome major constraints ?
69. Hunger and GMO development propaganda
70. of Propaganda and Patents
71. Re: of Propaganda and Patents
72. Re: of Propaganda and Patents
73. An attempt at consensus among participants
74. Re: An attempt at consensus among participants
75. Reducing hunger ?
76. Inventory of Biotechnology for Eastern and Central Africa
77. Re: of Propaganda and Patents
78. GM sweet potatoes in Kenya
79. Private sector help to institutes in developing countries
80. Economic/trade implications of increasing yield
81. Livestock biotechnologies and poverty alleviation
82. Re: Economic/trade implications of increasing yield
83. Many biotechnology methods
84. Biotechnology's uses
85. An attempt at consensus among participants
86. Re: Many biotechnology methods
87. Re: Many biotechnology methods
88. Public funding of agricultural R&D
89. Re: Many biotechnology methods
90. Re: Many biotechnology methods
91. Re: Many biotechnology methods
92. Re: Livestock biotechnologies and poverty alleviation
93. 2 Approaches to development
94. Re: Many biotechnology methods
95. Public institutions and the fight against hunger
96. Re: Public institutions and the fight against hunger
97. Re: Public institutions and the fight against hunger
98. Re: Public institutions and the fight against hunger
99. Biotechnology in food
100. Agbiotech in Africa
101. An overview
102. The use of biotechnology in livestock
103. Re: The use of biotechnology in livestock
104. Re: 2 Approaches to development
105. unknowns/uncertainties
106. Re: The use of biotechnology in livestock
107. Limitations to Food Security and Biotechnology
108. Re: Biotechnology in food
109. Re: Limitations to Food Security and Biotechnology
110. General Points
111. Risk assessment // Biotechnology and sustainability
112. Re: Limitations to Food Security and Biotechnology
113. Technical issues
114. Isn't the answer yes ?
115. Food Security, the answer is yes and maybe
116. Re: Risk assessment // Biotechnology and sustainability
117. Access, IPRs and the IU
118. Some closing thoughts
119. End of Biotech Conference 5
EMAIL ARCHIVES:
All messages posted during the two month-long conference will be stored and can be retrieved. The messages are stored in monthly files. To retrieve them, follow instructions below. The log files will be sent to you in return as a single e-mail message. Note: you must have joined the Forum and subscribed to Conference 5 to access the e-mail archives.
To get all messages posted in the conference during November 2000, send an
e-mail message to mailserv@mailserv.fao.org leaving the subject blank and entering the one-line text message as follows:
send listlog/biotech-room1.nov2000
Note: lower case letters as shown here, and not upper case letters, must be
used. No other text should be added to the message (e.g., mail signature).
To get the messages posted in the conference during December 2000, do the same
except writing
send listlog/biotech-room1.dec2000
