Previous Page Table of Contents Next Page


PART 3 - MONOGRAPHS

Yield is indicated as the percentage of the whole fish or shellfish weight Composition is indicated as the percentage of the edible portion.

AKIAMI PASTE SHRIMP

Acetes japonicus2,28(07)009,03

No data on this particular species have been found. The shrimp is used, probably almost exclusively, in the manufacture of a fermented product, a fish paste. The method of production is to mix the whole shrimps with salt, allow to drain after a few days, then pack into containers for at least 3 months. Further pressing or air-drying to reduce moisture content may occur.

Yield

The liquid drained off at an early stage may be evaporated to make a fermented fish sauce. Effectively therefore the edible yield is (100%).

Composition

Source 1 gives the composition of shrimps of an Atya species, which is used in the Phillipines in the same way as Acetes in China, Korea and other countries. This is the only analysis that has been found of a whole small tropical shrimp. The selected values are from this source. No information has been found on whether changes occur in the chitin of the shrimp shell, leading to the appearance of additional nutrients compared with the original shrimp.

Selected values

Protein[16.2%]
Fat[1.3%]

Sources

  1. Intengan, C.L. et al. Composition of Philippine foods, V. Philippine, J. of Science 85 203–213 (1956)

ALASKA POLLACK

Theragra chalcogramme1,48(04)016,01
(Walleye Pollack) 

Yield

FilletEdible FleshCommentsSource
35.4–55.0
38.5–53.2
 skin-on: two different grounds: mean not given1
28.9–38.6 skinless: mean not given1
39.1±2.4 ±SD (50 fish): skin-on: range 33.6–46.92
35.5±2.6 ±SD (50 fish): skinless: range 30.7–43.32
 41.7by deboning machine: double pass 3
35.5 skinless4
19.740.2single batch: filleted by machine, then trimmed and skinned5

Selected values

Skinless fillets36%
Edible flesh41%

Selected values are based, in the case of fillets, on the values from source 2, and, in the case of total edible flesh, on the mean of the two available results. The latter value is surprisingly low in comparison with the fillet yield.

Composition

Protein Fat Comments Source
12.7–15.70.2–1.1Ranges for five fishing grounds at different seasons1
14.6–15.50.7–1.0
14.5–16.30.4–0.7
14.3–17.40.2–0.4
16.0–16.60.5–0.6
14.31.2
15.4–16.80.20–0.32
15.4–16.70.16–0.31
17.0–18.00.19–0.23
13.3–16.10.6–1.1
15.70.3
15.80.5Estimated means of above data 
18.9
(16.4–19.3)
0.98
(0.6–1.3)
Means and ranges of 8 analyses (total of 60 fish)6
13.560.11Means of single batch of commercially supplied fillets7
18.320.86Five fish combined2
16.380.32Collected data8

Selected values

Protein 16.6%
Fat 0.6%

Selected values are based on the unweighted average of the mean values from each source.

Sources

  1. Kizevetter, I.V. Technological and chemical characteristics of commercial fish of the Pacific Ocean Basin. (TNIRO, Vladivostok, 1971) pp168–169

  2. Karl, H., Manthey, Monika and Schreiber, W. Investigations into frozen Alaska Pollock (Theragra chalcogramma). Fleischwirtschaaft 63 965–967 (1983)

  3. Miyauchi, D., Kudo, G. and Patashnik, M. Effect of processing variables on Storage characteristics of frozen minced Alaska pollock. Marine Fisheries Review 39 (No 5) 11–14 (1977)

  4. Reppond, K.D., Bullard, F.A. and Collins, J. Walleye pollock. Theragra chalcogramma: physical, chemical and sensory changes when held in ice and in carbon dioxide modified refrigerated seawater. Fishery Bulletin 77 481–488 (1979)

  5. Babbitt, J.K., Koury, B., Groninger, H. and Spinelli, J. Observations on reprocessing frozen Alaska pollock (Theragra chalcogramma). J. Food Sci. 49 323–326 (1984)

  6. Stansby, M.E. Chemical characteristics of fish caught in the North East Pacific Ocean. Marine Fisheries Review 38 (No 9) 1–11 (1976)

  7. Meinke, W.W., Finne, G., Nickelson, R. and Martin, R. Nutritive value of fillets and minced flesh from Alaska pollock and some underutilized finfish species from the Gulf of Mexico. J. Agric. Food Chem. 30 477–480

  8. Okada, M. and Noguchi, E. Trends in the utilization of Alaska pollack in Japan. in Fishery Products (ed. R. Kreuzer) (Fishing News Books, 1974) pp189–193

AMBERJACKS NEI

Seriola spp 1,70(23)048,xx

and

JAPANESE AMBERJACK

Seriola quinqueradiata 1,70(23)048,02

Yield

FilletEdible FleshCommentsSource
39.1 Seriola grandis:skinless: mean of six fish1
55.2 S. grandis: includes skin2

Seeleected values

Skinless fillets 46%
Edible flesh 53%

The value for fillets is the mean of the two widely different figures listed (after correcting the second for presence of skin): it cannot be considered very reliable. The value for total edible flesh, in the absence of any data, is based on values for other carangids.

Composition

Protein Fat Comments Source
22.81.9Seriola quinqueradiata:wild3
20.512.9S.quinqueradiata:farmed3
22.95.4s.quinqueradiata:wild means of dorsal and ventral muscles4
22.416.1S.quinqueradiata:farmed:means of dorsal and ventral muscles4
21.271.20S.quinqueradiata:farmed5
 8.0S.quinqueradiata:farmed6
20.11.4S.lalandi7
23.23.2S.lalandi:means of three fish8
22.543.12S.lalandione fish9
20.11.4S.lalandi:2
23.42.9S.lalandi:one fish10
22.51.6S.dumerili2
21.41.2S.grandis:mean of six fish1
22.51.3S.grandis2

Selected values

Protein22.0%
Fat (wild) 2.3%
Fat (farmed) 12.3%

It is proposed in source 3 that the fat content of farmed S.quinqueradiatais consistently much higher than that of wild populations. The data collected appear to support this. (The low value for farmed fish from source 5 is probably because the fish were young.) There is no difference in protein content between wild and farmed fish. The selected values are means of the relevant data.

Sources

  1. Vlieg, p. Proximate analysis of commercial New Zealand fish species-3. New Zealand J. Technol. 1 181–185 (1985)

  2. Bykov, V.P. Marine Fishes. (Russian Translation Series 7, A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, 1985) pp 51–52

  3. Saeki, k. and Kumagai, H. Muscle components of wild and cultured yellowtail. j. Fd. Hyg. Soc. Japan 20101–105 (1979)

  4. Shimizu, Y., Tada, M. and Endo, K. Seasonal variations in chemical constituents of yellowtail muscle-I Water,lipid and crude protein. Bull. jap. Soc. fish. 39993–999 (1973)

  5. Shimeno, S. et al. Effect of dietary lipid and carbohydrate on growth, feed conversion and body composition in young yellowtail. Bull. Jap. Soc. Sci. Fish. 511893–1898 (1985)

  6. Sakaguchi, H. Changes of biochemical components in serum, hepatopancreas and muscle of yellowtail by starvation. Bull. Jap. Soc. Fish. 42 1267–1272 (1976)

  7. Tulsner, M. The technological properties and processing possibilities of important northwest African commercial fish species. Fisherei-Forschung, Wissenschaftliche Schriftenreihe 355–63 (1965)

  8. Simonds, C.K. and Heydenrych, C. Composition of South African commercial fish species. Annual Report, Fishing Industry Research Institute 38 72 (1984)

  9. van Wyk, G.F. South African fish products. Part VIII. Composition of the flesh of Cape fishes. J. Soc. Chem. Ind. (Trans.) 63 367–371 (1944)

  10. Evans, A.A. and Wessels, J.P.H. Fatty acid composition of various fresh and canned products and one smoked fish product. Annual Report, Fishing Industry Research Institute 38 115–117 (1984)

ANCHOVIES

Engraulidae1,21(06)xxx,xx

The available data, particularly on yield, are not sufficiently comprehensive, in respect of seasonal and geographical variation, for any of the species included in this study. All the data have therefore been combined to give selected single values for all Engraulidae. The following species and groups, falling within the scope of this study, are therefore included here:

ANCHOVIES NEI Engraulidae 1,21(06)xxx,xx
EUROPEAN ANCHOVYEngraulis encrasicolus 1,21(06)002,01
JAPANESEE ANCHOVYEngraulis japonicus 1,21(06)002,02
NORTH PACIFIC ANCHOVYEngraulis mordax 1,21(06)002,07
ANCHOVETA (PERUVIAN ANCHOVY)Engraulis ringens 1,21(06)002,08
SOUTHERN AFRICAN ANCHOVY  
(CAPE ANCHOVY)Engraulis capensis 1,21(06)002,12
CENTRAL PACIFIC ANCHOVETACetengraulis mysticetus 1,21(06)015,03
STOLEPHORUS ANCHOVIES Stolephours spp 1,21(06)050,xx

Yield

FilletEdible FleshCommentSource
 61.0E. encrasicolus1
 61.2E. encrasicolus2
 64.2E. encrasicolus:Spain:single 
  sample of 21 fish21
 77.8E. encrasicolus: defination of ‘edible flesh’ not clear3
 74.1E. encrasicolus: defination of edible part not clear4
 57–64E. japonicus: yield of gutted, headed fish1
 60.0E.japonicus5
 63.8E. anchoita1
 61.6E. mordax6
 51E. mordax2
 64.3E.ringens: yield of gutted, headed fish7
 64.5Anchoa nasus:yield of gutted headed fish7

Selected values

Skinless fillets51%
Edible flesh62%

The value for total edible flesh is the mean of values quoted, but omitting those where definition of edible flesh is not entirely clear and those which give gutted, headed weight rather than edible flesh.

Composition

It is common for these very small fish to be eaten whole (sometimes described as “whitebait”); in addition to data on the composition of the edible flesh, therefore, information on the composition of the whole fish has been collected and assessed separately.

a) Whole fish

ProteinFatCommentsSource
15.660.78Engraulidae: Philippines: no other information8
20.22.6Engraulis encrasicolus2
19.013 June
8 July
7 August
E. ringens: monthly means of 15 to 20 fish: Chile9
19.75.2E. capensis: mean of 9 fish10
14.811.98 Stolephorus commersonii: Philippine: single sample11
20.741.40S. commersonii: Philippines: single sample12
17.820.29S. commersonii: India: combined sample of 5 fish13
18.743.9 S. malabaricus: India: combined sample of 5 fish13
19.491.51S. indicus: Philippines: single sample12
14.521.38 S. tri: India: combined sample14
17.42.3Anchoa spp; Gulf of Mexico: median values over 4 seasons15

b) Edible flesh

ProteinFatCommentsSource
18.6–22.9
mean 21.2
0.94–5.97
mean 2.65
E. Encrasicolus: caught off Vigo, Spain: 29 bactches (362 fish) caught over full year16
21.803.72E. Encrasicolus: Italy17
21.813.55E. encrasicolus: Gulf of Naples: nitrogen content4
18.401.67E. encrasicolus: Spain: mean of 36 fish caught at same time3
23.033.3E. encrasicolus2
 7.6 November
7.0 January
4.0 March
E. encrasicolus: Italy: monthly means: total of 1255 fish, analyzed is lots of 50 fish20
21.183.20E. encrasicolus: Spain: single sample of 21 fish21
 1.3–10.7
mean 4.74
E. japonicus: mean of 8 lost of 20 fish, caught over 6 months18
13.3–21.03.3–18.0E. japonicus2
17.3–19.10.7–9.2E. mordax2
 4.2E. ringens7
20.90.25Stolephorus commersonii: Philippines: single sample11
 2.8Anchoa nasus7
18.16.9Various species, not readily identifiable: data include those for E. japonicus given by source 2: overall means of all data taken19

Selected values

a) Whole fish

Only one set of data, from source 15, can be regarded as an approach to a yearlong survey of composition and it relates to relatively minor Anchoa spp. The data from source 9 are the only Engraulis results clearly covering an extended period. Overall means of all the data have been taken as the selected values.

Protein18.0%
Fat2.8%

b) Edible flesh

The data from sources 16 and 18 have more seasonal coverage than others, though the latter has data only on fat content. Overall means of all the data are consistent with these more comprehensive surveys.

Protein 20.2%
Fat 4.2%

Sources

  1. Bykov, V.P. Opportunities for upgrading fish with lower market value. Fishery Products. ed. R. Kreuzer. (Fishing New Books, London, 1974) pp 153–156

  2. Bykov, V.P. Marine Fishes. (Russian Translation Series 7, A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, 1985) pp 94–85

  3. de las Heras, A.R. and Mendez Isla, M.C. Contribution to the chemical study of Spanish fish. Anales de Bromatologia 4 403–410 (1952)

  4. Carteni, A. and Aloj, G. Chemical composition of marine animals of the Gulf of Naples. Quaderni della Nutrizione 1 49–63 (1934)

  5. Suzuki, T. Fish and Krill Protein: Processing Technology (Applied Science Publishers, London, 1981) p 6

  6. Miyauchi, D. and Steinberg, M. Machine separation of edible flesh from fish. Fishery Industrial Research 6 165–171 (1970)

  7. Golovin, A.N. Technological properties of some species of fish from the south east of the Pacific Ocean. Ryb. Khoz. No. 7, 69–71 (1977)

  8. Valenzuela, A. Composition and nutritive value of Philippine food fishes. Philippine J. of Science 36 235–242 (1928)

  9. Barrera, G.C. and Aguilera M.E.M. Monthly variation in the contents of water, protein, extractable lipids, their reactivity and tocopherol contents, in Chilean anchovies (Engraulis ringens). Anales de la Facultad de Quimica y Farmacia 20 24–29 (1968)

  10. Simmonds, C.K. and Tanner, K.R.O. Analysis of South African commercial fish species. Annual Report, Fishing Industry Research Institute 34 51–52 (1980)

  11. Intengan, C.L. et. at. Composition of Philippine foods V. Philippine J. of Science 85 203–213 (1956)

  12. Sulit, J.S. et. al. Proximate chemical composition of various species of Philippine market fishes. Philippine J. of Fisheries 2 109–122 (1953)

  13. Ayyappan, M.P.K., Shenoy, A.V. and Gopakumar, K. Fishery Technology 13 153–155 (1976)

  14. Chari, S.T. Nutritive value of some of the West coast marine food fishes of the Madras Province. Ind. J. Med. Res. 36 253–259 (1948)

  15. Thompson, M.H. Proximate composition of Gulf of Mexico industrial fish. Fishery Industrial Research 3(2) 29–67 (1966)

  16. Fraga, F. Seasonal variation of the chemical composition of the anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus) Invest. Pesq. 2 21–31 (1966)

  17. Cuisa, W. and Giaccio, M. Report on nutritive value and market prices of the more important fish species of the Adriatic coast. Quaderni di Merceologia 8 1–40 (1969)

  18. Hayashi, K. and Takagi, T. Seasonal variations in lipids and fatty acids of Japanese anchovy, Engraulis japonica. Bull. Fac. Fish. Hokkaido Univ. 29(1) 38–37 (1978)

  19. Kizevetter, I.V. Technological and chemical characteristics of commercial fish of the Pacific Ocean basin. (TNIRO, Vladivostok, 1971) p 81

  20. Viviani, R. et. al. First observations on seasonal changes of the lipids in the tissues of some Adriatic clupeids. Rivista Italiana delle Sostanze Grasse 45 779–790 (1968)

  21. Gimenez, J.C. and de las Heras, A.R. Composition and energy value of some fish eaten in Madrid. Trabajos del Instituto Espanñol de Oceanografía No 17 (1943)

ATKA MACKEREL

Pleurogrammus azonus1,78(07)014,02

Some of the small amount of data collected relates to the similar species, Pleurogrammus monopterygius (also called atka mackerel).

Yield

FilletEdible FleshCommentsSource
39.3 Pleurogrammus monopterygius: skinless1
29 P. monopterygius: skinless2
 57.2P. monopterygius: includes skin3
 51.85P. azonus: skinless4
 54.2–66.6
mean 59.8
P. sp: includes skin5

Selected values

Skinless fillet[34%]
Edible flesh[54%]

The difference between the fillet yields from sources 1 and 2 is ascribed in source 1 to the presence of mature gonads in one of the batches. The mean value has been selected. The values for total edible flesh have been averaged after correcting for skin, where necessary, by a 5% reduction.

ProteinFatCommentsSource
17.44.4Pleurogrammus monopterygius: menas of two batches at different seasons1
16.23.8 P. monopterygius3
16.4–20.1
mean 18.6
0.5–4.4
mean 2.1
P. azonus: means of monthly batches over complete year4
14.1–21.2
mean 17.9
0.3–10.9
mean 5.5
P. sp: means of several grounds and seasons5

Selected values

Protein[17.5%]
Fat [4.0%]

The selected values are the means of the collected data.

Sources

  1. Conrad, J.W. et al. Observations from a preservation and processing study on Atka mackerel, (Pleurogrammus monopterygius). Mar. Fish. Rev.47 (1) 73–77 (1985)

  2. Reppond, K.D. quoted by Conrad et al (source 1)

  3. Bykov, V.P. Marine Fishes. (Russian Translation Series, 7, A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, 1985) p 123

  4. Fujii, Y. Chemical studies on atka mackerel meat. Bull. Fac.Fish. Hokkaido Univ.5 253–276 (1954)

  5. Kizevetter, I.V. Technological and chemical characteristics of commercial fish of the Pacific Ocean basin. (TNIRO, Vladivostok, 1971) pp 249–252

ATLANTIC COD

Gadus morhua1,48(04)002,02
Yield 


FilletEdible FleshCommentsSource
42.0 skinless fillets: % of gutted, head-on weight1
42.0 skinless fillets: % of gutted, head-on weight2
36.0 skinless fillets: % of whole weight
46.0 skin-on fillets: % of gutted, head-on weight3
41.3 skinless fillets: % of gutted, head-on weight
38.9 skinless, trimed, V-cut fillets: of gutted, head-on weight
40–47.2
mean 45.5
 skin-on fillets: cut by machine: % of gutted, head-on weight4
37.0 skinless fillets: % of gutted head-on weight5
 56.0sum of fillet yield and yield of flesh recovered from filleting
 49.0waste: % of gutted, head-on weight
 64.6species not stated: edible yield as % of gutted headless fish6
41.0 skinless fillets: % of gutted head-on weight7
 51.0total recovered mince: % of gutted head-on weight
46.0 skinless filleets: % of gutted, headless weight8
 75.0recovered flesh: % of gutted, headless weight
 52.2
53.9
edible meat: % of whole weight9

Selected Values

Skinless fillets 34%
Edible flesh 47%

Cod is typically landed either gutted with head-on, or gutted, headless (often described as “dressed”). Mean values of yield of skinned fillets and of skin-on fillets have been converted to a whole fish basis by the use of factors obtained from sources 2, 9, and 10 and an overall mean value then derived. Similarly, the tabulated yields of total edible flesh have been converted to a whole fish basis, then averaged.

Composition

a) Surveys

ProteinFatCommentsSource
17.94±0.86 ±SD: 295 fish: analysed over complete year: caught mainly in North Sea and Atlantic11
18.16±0.63 ±SD: 182 fish: analysed over complete year: caught in north Sea and Atlantic12
 0.73±0.15±SD: 182 fish: analysed over complete year: caught in North Sea and Atlantic3
18.06±0.610.15±0.06±SD: 37 fish: analysed over complete year: caught around Iceland13
18.36 144 fish: analysed in February, May and October: caught in North Sea3
16.820.3020 batches: analysed over two complete years: caught in Baltic Sea14
 1.0112 batches: analysed each month of complete year: caught off Nova Scotia15
17.43±0.89 ±SD: 73 fish: caught February, March, April in Baltic Sea3
 0.57-0.7412 monthly batches of 8 fish: caught off East Coast of Canada16
18.1±0.9 ±SD: at least 8 batches caught over spring, summer and autumn: caught at Iceland17
19.6±1.4 ±SD: at least 8 batches caught over spring, summer and autumn: caught inshore USA
 0.034–0.45analysed each month: Baltic Sea24

Composition

(b) Other data

Protein FatCommentssource
18.10.3 Norwegian fish18
18.20.77 single catch: Canada19
16.9–19.4
mean 17.8
0.0–0.3
mean 0.2
no further infomation given9
15.0–19.00.1–0.9 10–13 samples: probably north sea1
18.3±0.6 fish selected to give wide range of sizes: Norway20
17.25±0.830.63±0.27±SD: 40 fish21
18.420.42 single batch: USA22
16.00.48 single batch: Northwest Atlantic: protein calculated by difference23

Selected Values

The data have been divided above into surveys covering all or part of the year, and more limited data. Only the former are used to derive recommended values: the latter are listed to allow comparison over greater geographical and, possibly, size ranges.

Protein 18.1%
Fat 0.8%

The protein value is a simple average of the means from sources 11, 12, 13, 14 and 17. The fat value is an average of means from sources 3,15 and 16. The unused data arise from measurements using methods that are known to give incomplete extraction of fat.

Sources

  1. Reay, G.A., Cutting, C.L. and Shewan, J.M. The nation's food. VI Fish as Food. II The chemical composition of fish. J. Soc. Chem. Ind. 62 77–85 (1943)

  2. Waterman, J.J. Measures, stowage rates and yields of fishery products. Torry Advisory Note No 17 (Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, UK, 1964) pp8–9

  3. Torry Research Station. Unpublished data

  4. Private communication, UK industry

  5. King, F.J. How to use nearly all the ocean's food. Oak Brook Seminar: Mechanical recovery and utilization of fish flesh. ed. Martin, R.E. (National Fisheries Institute, Washington, DC, 1972) pp222–238

  6. Clark, E.D. and Clough, E.W. Nutritive value of fish and shellfish. Bureau of Fisheries Document No 1000 (Department of Commerce, Washington, 1926) pp502–526

  7. Ravichander, N. and Keay, J.N. The production and properties of minced fish from several commercially important species. Conference Proceedings: The production and utilization of mechanically recovered fish flesh (minced fish). ed. Keay, J.N. (Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, UK, 1976) pp18–24

  8. Bligh, E.G. and Regier, L.W. The potential and limitations of minced fish. ibid pp73–77

  9. Bykov, V.P. Marine Fishes. (Russian Translation Series 7, A.A. Balkema, Balkema, Rotterdam 1985) p102

  10. Bedford, B.C., Woolner, L.E. and Jones, B.W. Length-weight relationships for commercial fish species and conversion factors for various presentations. Fisheries Research Data Report No 10 (Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Lowestoft, UK, 1986) p13

  11. Analytical Methods Committee. Nitrogen factor for cod flesh. Analyst 91, 540–542 (1966)

  12. McLay, R., Howgate, P.F. and Morrison, J. Nitrogen content of seven British commercial species of fish. J. Assoc. Publ. Analysts 24 131–139 (1986)

  13. Icelandic Fisheries Laboratory. Unpublished data

  14. Kordyl, E. Chemical composition of the Baltic cod and herring in relation to the degree of sexual maturity. Reports of the Sea Fisheries Institute, Gdynia No 6, 145–157 (1951)

  15. Dambergs, N. Extractives of fish muscle. 4. Seasonal variations of fat, water-solubles, protein and water in cod (Gadus morhua L.) fillets. J.Fish. Res. Bd. Canada 21 703–709 (1964)

  16. Jangaard, P.M., Brockerhoff, H., Burgher, R.D. and Hoyle, R.J. Seasonal changes in general condition and lipid content of cod from inshore waters. J. Fish. Res. Bd. Canada 24 607–612 (1967)

  17. Sidwell, V.D., Bonnet, J.C. and Zook, E.G. Chemical and nutritive values of several fresh and canned finfish, crustaceans and mollusks. Part 1: Proximate composition, calcium and phosphorus. Marine Fisheries Review 35 (No 12) 16–19 (1973)

  18. Taarland, T., Mathiesen, E., Ovsthus, O. and Braekkan, O.R. Nutritional values and vitamins of Norwegian fish and fish products. Tidsskrift for Hermetikindustri 44 405–412 (1958)

  19. Fraser, D.I., Mannan, A. and Dyer, W.J. Proximate composition of Canadian Atlantic fish. III Sectional differences in the flesh of a species of Chondrostei, one of Chimaerae, and of some miscellaneous Teleosts. J. Fish. Res. Bd. Canada 18 893–905 (1961)

  20. Braekkan, O.R. A comparative study of vitamins in the trunk muscles of fishes. Fiskeridirektoratets Skrifter, Serie Teknologiske undersokelser 3 No 8 (1959)

  21. Lang, K. and Christen, U. The Composition of the muscle meat of a number of sea fish of nutritional importance. Fleischwirtschaft 63 967–970 (1983)

  22. Jhaveri, S.N., Karakoltsidis, P.A., Montecalvo, J. and Constantindes, S.M. Chemical composition and protein quality of some Southern New England marine species. J. Fd. Sci. 49 110–113 (1984)

  23. Krzynowek, J., Peton D. and Wiggin, K. Proximate composition, cholesterol and calcium content in mechanically separated fish flesh from three species of the Gadidae family. J. Fd. Sci. 49 1182–1185 (1984)

  24. Bogncki, M. and Trzesinski, P. Fluctuations in the water and fat content of the cod. Journal du Conseil 16 208–210 (1950)

ATLANTIC HERRING

Clupea harengus 1,21(05)001,05

Yield

FilletEdible FleshCommentsSource
43.0 skilnless: %of whole weight1
 61.0by deboning machine: sum of yields from fillets and backbone: %of whole weight
 80.0by deboning machne: % of headed, qutted weight2
53.0 skin-on: % of whole weight3
 67.5ubcludes ski: % of whole weight4
51.1 probably skin-on: % of whole weight5
 65.0by deboning machine: % of whole weight6

Selected vlaues

Skinless fillets 46%
Edible flesh 61%

To derive the figure for fillets, the values from sources 3 and 5 were reduced by 10% to take account of the skin and then combined with the value from source 1 to give an average figure. The value for edible flesh from source 2, which is a percentage of the headed, gutted weight, has been converted to a whole fish basis. Sources 4 and 6 give data on the yield of headed, gutted fish from whole fish, which average 72.75%; this gigure is used to convert the 80% yield from source 2, to 58.2% based on whole weight. The figure from source 4, was reduced by 10% to correct for the skin. These two converted figures were combined with those from sources 1 and 6 give the selected vlaue.

Composition

ProteinFatCommentsSource
17.7
7.3
5.2
8.2
spring spawning
autumn spawning ý Baltic herring sampled over most of year
7
18.942.4mean of 16 fish, caught at same time: West Atlantic8
16.912.4different seasons: Norway9
17.314.9
17.03±0.8714.46±4.50±SD: mean of 40 fish, origing not stated10
15.014.7 one monthmeans of a number of fish, caught during11
-14.6mean of 91 samples caught throughout season; caught in three successive years: North Sea12
-5.0mean of 66 samples caught throughout season: caught in two successive years: Baltic12
-17.5mean of several thousand analyses: North Sea and Atlantic13
-10.5 caught over a seasonmean of 346 samples of Canadian herring,14
17–21
18.0–19.7
16–19
2.4–10
5.6–22.5
12–26
Baltic
North Atlantic
North Sea fish ý ranges at different seasons; number of not known
4

Selected values

Protein17.8%
Fat13.8% (Atlantic 14.2%, Baltic 6.1%)

The data listed exclude many single analyses, those of limited range and some older work. Thorough studies of composition throughout the catching season are surprisingly few for such a well-studied species. A lot of scientific work has been devoted to the relationship between fat and water contents in this species.

The selected protein value is the mean of values from sources 7, 9 and 4, which give rsults over an extended period: the other analyses listed are from smaller samples, and are consistent with the selected value.

The selected fat content is a weighted mean of separate values chosen for Atlantic and Baltic herring: it is assumed that 5% of the total catch is from the Baltic. The separate figure for Atlantic herring is the mean of those from sources 12, 13 and 14, sources which cover the catching season in the three areas concerned. For Baltic herring, often considered a sub-species, the values from sources 7 and 12 are averaged.

Sources

  1. Ravichander, N. and Keay, J.N. The production and properties of minced fish from several commercially important species. Conference proceedings: The production and utilization of mechanically recovered fish flesh (minced fish). ed. Keay, J.N. (Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, UK, 1976) pp18–24

  2. Legendre, R. and Hotton, C. Separation of flesh and bones from fish. Halifax Laboratory, New Series Circular No 50 (Fisheries and Marine Service, Canada, 1975)

  3. Reay, G.A., Cutting, C.L. and Shewan, J.M. The nation's food VI. Fish as food II. The chemical composition of fish. J. Soc. Chem. Ind. 62 77–85 (1943)

  4. Bykov, V.P. Marine fishes. (Russian Translation Series 7, A.A. Balkema. Rotterdam, 1985) pp69–70

  5. Clark, E.D. and Clough, R.W. Nutritive value of fish and shellfish. Bureau of Fisheries Document No 1000 (Department of Commerce, Washington, 1926) pp502–526

  6. Keay, J.N. and Hardy, R. Application of bone separation techniques to pelagic and underutilized species and the preparation of derived products. 2nd Technical Seminar on mechanical recovery and utilization of fish flesh. (ed.) R.E. Martin (National Fisheries Institute, Washington, DC, 1974) pp88–100

  7. Kordyl, E. Chemical composition of the Baltic cod and herring in relation to the degree of sexual maturity. Reports of the Sea Fisheries Institute, Gdynia No 6, 145–157 (1951)

  8. Clark, E.D. and Almy, L.H. A chemical study of food fishes. J. Biol. Chem. 33 483–498 (1918)

  9. Taarland, T., Mathiesen, E., Ovsthus, O. and Braekkon, O.R. Nutritional values and vitamins of Norwegian fish and fish products. Tidsskrift. Hermetikind. 44 405–412 (1958)

  10. Lang, K. and Christen, U. The composition of the muscle meat of a number of sea fish of nutritional importance. Fleischwirtsch. 63 967–970 (1983)

  11. Braekkan, O.R. and Probst, A. Vitamins in Norwegian fish I. Contents of nicotinic acid, riboflavin, pantothenic acid, vitamin B12 and vitamin A in the whole fish and different organs of herring (Clupea harengus) and mackerel (Scomber scombrus). Fiskeridirektoratets Skrifter: Serie Teknol. undersokelser II No 13 (1953)

  12. Bramsnaes, F., Mogensen, E. and Birno, K.E. Fat content of herring, sprat and mackerel 1949–1952. Meddelelse fra Fiskeriministeriets Forsoglaboratorium, February 1954, pp1–16

  13. Herring Industry Board (UK), unpublished

  14. Stoddard, J.H. Fat contents of Canadian Atlantic herring. Fisheries Research Board of Canada, Technical Report No 79 (1968)

ATLANTIC MACKEREL

Scomber scombrus1,75(01)002,01

Yield

Fillet Edible Flesh Comments Source
55.3 Adriatic sea: sampled monthly over complete year1
 53.3US Atlantic coast: 10 monthly samples of 8–10 fish2
 90.6yield by deboning machine from headed and gutted fish3
 66.1Spain: mean of 3 fish4
45.8  6
53–68  6
 57.7mean of 2 fish7

Selected values

Skinless fillets54%
Edible flesh 61%

It is seldom entirely clear from the literature quoted whether the data definitely refer to fillet yield or to total edible flesh. The value from source 3, based on headed and gutted fish, gives a yield of 65.2% when converted to a whole fish basis using data from source 2. The selected values are the means of the collected data. They are somewhat higher than the values selected for chub mackerel (S. japonicus). It is possible that some of the above data include skin, which would give a higher apparent yield.

Composition

ProteinFatCommentsSource
 0.60–12.02 mean 6.41Adriatic sea: monthly over complete year: total of several hundred fish1
18.610.1US Atlantic coast: 10 monthly samples: values calculated from separate white and dark muscle data2
18.813.8S.W. England: 11 batches over a year8
 1.3–25.0 mean 12.3S.W. England: 6 bi-monthly batches9
13.9–19.4 mean 17.310.4–28.7 mean 21.0US Atlantic coast: 26 fish over a year: probably include skin10
18.2811.1Italy11
17.58.0Spring
Autumn ýNova Scotia
12
18.115.3
18.31.8Spring
Autumný means of 8 or 9 fish Nova Scotia
13
17.520.6
 2.0–25.6 mean 9.8W. Atlantic: 11 batches over a year: total of 119 fish14
 1.1–28.0 mean 11.1Three grounds: sampled over whole part of year15
16.5–24.2 mean 20.90.9–22.3 mean 9.9means of 5 grounds6
19.110.7mean of 2 fish7
18.65.4Spring
Autumný Norway
16
18.520.2
18.780.74means of 3 fish4
17.1411.10 17
16.4–18.419.3–28.7 18
17.2–19.65.3–18.8ranges of composition in fish of different sizes19
 10.9values of two different 
 15.8batches20
19.65.1one batch21

Selected values

Protein 18.7%
Fat 11.4%

Seven sources, 1, 2, 8, 9, 10, 14 and 15, have studied the species over all or most of the year.

Data from source 10 are not internally consistent, the frequency of sampling is not clear and the sample analysed probably included skin. The fat content from source 1 is surprisingly low and probably represents an untypical population. Sources 10 and 1 are therefore excluded from the selection of representative values: those selected are means of the remaining data.

Sources

  1. Coppini, R. Study of variations in the chemical composition of the flesh of mackerel from the middle western Adriatic, particularly with regard to lipids. Proceedings and Technical Papers, General Fisheries Council for the Mediterranean. 8 395–399 (1967)

  2. Leu, S-S. et al. Atlantic mackerel (Scomber scombrus L.): seasonal variation in proximate composition and distribution of chemical nutrients. J. Fd Sci. 46 1635–1638 (1981)

  3. Kolakowski, E., Kaminski, L. and Salacki, M. Comparison of minced flesh yield from selected sea-fish species in Selo-Bibun type mincer-separators. Przemysl Spozywczy 30 60–61 (1976)

  4. de las Heras, A.R. and Mendez Isla, M.C. Contribution to the chemical study of Spanish fish. Anales de Bromatologia 4 403–410 (1952)

  5. Clark, E.D. and Clough, R.W. Nutritive value of fish and shellfish. Bureau of Fisheries Document No 1000 (Department of Commerce, Washington, 1926) pp 502–526

  6. Bykov, V.P. Marine Fishes (Russian Translation Series 7, A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, 1985) pp 220–221

  7. Plimmer, R.H.A. Analyses and energy values of foods (HMSO, London, 1921)

  8. Hardy, R. and Keay, J.N. Seasonal variations in the chemical composition of Cornish mackerel, Scomber scombrus (L), with detailed reference to the lipids. J. Fd Technol. 7 125–137 (1972)

  9. Smith, J.G.M., Hardy, R. and Young, K.W. A seasonal study of the storage characteristics of mackerel stored at chill and ambient temperatures. Advances in Fish Science and Technology. ed. J.J. Connell (Fishing News Books, 1980) pp 372–378

  10. Sohn, B.I., Carver, J.H. and Mangan, G.F. Composition of commercially important fish from New England waters Part 1 - proximate analyses of cod, haddock, Atlantic ocean perch, butterfish and mackerel. Comm. Fish. Rev. 23 (2) 7–10 (1961)

  11. Carteni, A. and Aloj, G. Chemical composition of marine animals of the Gulf of Naples. Quaderni della Nutrizione 1 49–62 (1934)

  12. Ke, P.J., Nash, D.M. and Ackman, R.G. Quality preservation in frozen mackerel. Can. Inst. Food Sci. Technol. J. 9 135–138 (1976)

  13. Bhuiyan, A.K.M.A., Ratnayake, W.M.N. and Ackman, R.G. Effect of smoking on the proximate composition of Atlantic mackerel (Scomber scombrus). J. Fd Sci. 51 327–329 (1986)

  14. Stansby, M.E. and Lemon, J.M. Studies on the handling of fresh mackerel. Fish and Wildlife Service, Research Report No 1 (US Dept. of Interior, 1941)

  15. Podsevalov, V.N. and Perova, L.A. Fat content of mackerel and scad flesh in relation to month of catching. Ryb. Khoz. No 3 72 (1975)

  16. Taarland, T. et al. Nutritional values and vitamins of Norwegian fish and fish products. Tidsskrift for Hermetikindustri 44 405–412 (1958)

  17. Cuisa, W. and Giaccio, M. Report on nutritive value and market prices of the more important fish species of the Adriatic coast. Quaderni di Merceologia 8 1–40 (1969)

  18. Butler, C. Nutritional value of fish in reference to atherosclerosis and current dietary research. Comm. Fish. Rev. 20 (7) 7–16 (1958)

  19. Maslennikova, N.V. Content of fat and protein in mackerel of varying size. Ryb. Khoz. No 5 62–63 (1976)

  20. Lyubavina, L.A., Bakaneva, G.F. and Dubintskaya, G.M. Chemical composition and properties of the fat of some species of fish. Trudy PINRO 36 160–170 (1975)

  21. Braekkan, O.R. and Probst, A. Vitamins in Norwegian fish I. Fiskeridirektoratets Skrifter, Serie Teknologiske undersokelser II No 13 (1953)

ATLANTIC REDFISHES

Sebastes spp1,78(01)001,xxx

Data for individual species of Sebastes and related genera have been collected. The selected values will also, therefore, be valid for the following.

SCORPION FISHES

Scorpaenidae1,78(01)xxx,xx

Yield

FilletEdible FleshCommentsSource
33.6 Sebastes marinus: includes subspecies marinus and mentella: mean of 37 fish caught together1
27.547.0S. marinus: edible flesh by deboning machine2
 49.6S. marinus 
 47.3S. mentella3
29.0 Sebastodes (= Sebastes)alutus: mean of 16 fish10
27.1 Sebastodes (= Sebastes ) alutus: mean of 147 fish caught at different times22
29.9 Sebastes alutus 
31.5 S. proriger11
28.9 S. reedi 
 46.5Sebastodes (= Sebastes)brevispinis: edible flesh by deboning machine13
28.040.5Sebastodes edible 
  (=Sebastes) pinninger flesh by 
28.041.7Sebastodes deboning 
  (=Sebastes) Flavidus: machine14
16.9–40.5 mean 26.3pinninger and 4 other species: 180 fishSebastodes (= Sebastes)15
29.5 Helicolenus dactylopteus16

Selected values

Skinless fillets 29%
Edible flesh 45%

The data do not demonstrate any consistent differences between Atlantic and Pacific redfishes, so all will be considered together. Source 22 comes closest to a seasonal survey but is limited geographically: the selected values are means of all the data.

Composition

ProteinFatCommentsSource
18.65.1Sebastes marinus: includes subspecies marinus and mentella: means of 21 fish caught together1
17.86.6S. marinus 
17.33.7S. mentella3
18.01.1S. marinus: means of 84 fish caught at 4 seasons4
18.33.5S. norvegicus (= marinus): mean of 2 fish5
18.33.5S. marinus6
21.70.81S. marinus: means of 17 or 19 fish7
17.53.3S. marinus8
17.335.01S. marinus: means of 40 fish9
17.61.32Sebastodes (=Sebastes)alutus10
16.8–19.71.5–10.6Sebastodes (= Sebastes)alutus3
17.4–20.4 mean 19.20.36–4.03 mean 1.54Sebastodes (= Sebastes)alutus: means of 147 fish caught at different times23
19.01.7Sebastes alutus + 7 other Sebastes spp: mean values12
16.3–21.6 mean 19.00.56–4.10 mean 1.50Sebastodes (= Sebastes) pinniger and 8 other spp: mean values of 223 fish, some caught over extended period, others not15
18.72.9means of 13 minor spp of Sebastodes (= Sebastes)3
18.71.25wild Sebastes inermis: 
19.17.31farmed 3 fish each17
18.31.04Sebastodes (= Sebastes) sp: means of 12 fish18
19.02.26Sebastodes (= Sebastes) melanops: means of 6 fish19
18.21.84Sebastodes (= Sebastes)pinniger: means of 6 fish19
19.260.29Sebastichthys capensis: means of 6 fish20
20.90.7Helicolenus dactylopterus: means of 9 fish21
17.35.3Helicolenus dactylopterus16
16.31.21Helicolenus papillosus22

Selected values

Protein18.4%
Fat2.7%

There are no consistent differences between Atlantic and Pacific redfishes, so all will be considered together. Seasonal surveys are limited: the selected values are overall means of all data (excluding only the non-typical data for the farmed species in source 17).

Sources

  1. Hryniewiecka, K. Technological and chemical characteristics of the North Atlantic redfish. Prace Morskiego Instytutu Rybackiego 13 B 19–38 (1964)

  2. King, F.J. and Carver, J.H. How to use nearly all the ocean's food. Oak Brook Seminar: Mechanical recovery and utilization of fish flesh. ed. Martin, R.E. (National Fisheries Institute, Washington, DC, 1972) pp 222–238

  3. Bykov, V.P. Marine Fishes (Russian Translation Series 7, A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, 1985) pp 242–2513.

  4. Sohn, B.I., Carver, J.H. and Mangan, G.F. Composition of commercially important fish from New England waters. Part 1 - proximate analyses of cod, haddock, Atlantic ocean perch, butterfish and mackerel. Comm. Fish. Rev. 23 (2) 7–10 (1961)

  5. Reay, G.A., Cutting, C.L. and Shewan, J.M. The nation's food. VI. Fish as food. II. The chemical composition of fish. J. Soc. Chem. Ind. 62 77–85 (1943)

  6. Taarland, T. et al. Nutritional values and vitamins of Norwegian fish and fish products. Tidsskr. Hermetikind. 44 405–412 (1958)

  7. Sidwell, V.D., Bonnet, J.C. and Zook, E.G. Chemical and nutritive values of several fresh or canned finfish, crustaceans and mollusks Part 1: Proximate composition, calcium and phosphorus. Mar. Fish. Rev.35 (12) 16–19 (1973)

  8. Fraser, D.I., Mannan, A. and Dyer, W.J. Proximate composition of Canadian Atlantic fish. III. Sectional differences in the flesh of a species of Chondrostei, one of Chimaerae, and of some miscellaneous teleosts. J. Fish. Res. Bd Canada 18 893–905 (1961)

  9. Lang, K. and Christen, U. The composition of the muscle meat of a number of sea fish of nutritional importance. Fleischwirtschaft 63 967–970 (1983)

  10. Iverson, J.L. Technical Note No 48 - Pacific ocean perch - proximate composition. Comm. Fish. Rev. 20 (12) 22–24 (1958)

  11. Tomlinson, N. et al. Utilization of Pacific rockfish 1. Comparison of Sebastes alutus, S. reedi and S. proriger. Fisheries Research Board of Canada, Technical Report No 425 (1973)

  12. Tomlinson N. et al. Utilization of Pacific rockfish 2. Technological evaluation of six species for possible group marketing. Fishery and Marine Service (Canada), Technical Report No 664 (1976)

  13. Miyauchi, D. and Steinberg, M. Machine separation of edible flesh from fish. Fishery Ind. Res. 6 165–171 (1970)

  14. Crawford, D.L., Law, D.K. and Babbitt, J.K. Yield and acceptability of machine separated minced flesh from some marine food fish. J. Fd Sci. 37 551–553 (1972)

  15. Thurston, C.E. Proximate composition of nine species of rockfish. J. Fd Sci. 26 38–42 (1961)

  16. Torry Research Station. Unpublished data

  17. Saeki, K. and Kumagai, H. Chemical components in ten kinds of wild and cultured fish. Bull. Jap. Soc. Sci. Fish. 50 1551–1554 (1984)

  18. Dill, D.B. The proximate composition of certain Pacific coast fishes. Ind. Eng. Chem. 17 629–630 (1925)

  19. Gordon, D.T. and Roberts G.L. Mineral and proximate composition of Pacific coast fish. J. Agric. Fd Chem. 25 1262–1268 (1977)

  20. van Wyk, G.F. South African fish products. Part VIII. Composition of the flesh of Cape fishes. J. Soc. Chem. Ind. (Trans.) 63 367–371 (1944)

  21. Simmonds, C.K. and Seaman, P.D. Composition of South African commercial fish species. Annual Report, Fishing Industry Research Institute 35 53 (1981)

  22. Bremner, H.A. Storage trials on the mechanically separated flesh of three Australian mid- water fish species 1. Analytical tests. Food Tech. in Australia 29 89–93 (1977)

  23. Thurston, C.E. Proximate composition and sodium and potassium contents of four species of commercial bottom fish. J. Fd Sci. 26 495–498 (1961)

BLUE MUSSEL

Mytilus edulis3,16(10)001,05

The selected values are likely to be applicable to the following additional species and group coming within the scope of the study, although almost all the data collected refers to M. edulis.

SEA MUSSELS NEI

Mytilidae3,16(10)xxx,xx

GREEN MUSSEL

Mytilus smaragdinus3,16(10)001,10

Yield

Like oysters (see PACIFIC CUPPED OYSTER) the yield figures in the literature are likely to be particularly variable compared with fish and crustacea, because of the inherent variability of water content and the possibility, seldom made clear, that the shell liquor is included in the edible portion. An additional complication is that, commercially, mussels are commonly opened by heating. Partial cooking results and the shell liquor is lost. Cooking reduces the meat weight, while the loss of shell liquor will be significant if the yield is calculated on the cooked weight.

Edible Flesh Comments Source
19.4
13.5
cultivated
natural     ý  Mytilus edulis: USA: opened by steaming
1
22.28M. edulis: Spain: studied over range of grounds and seasons2
42.8M. edulis: India: includes shell liquor3
16.50M. edulis: India5
15.00M. edulis: India: cooked yield6
27.79M. edulis: USA: mean of 231 shellfish taken over 2 months7
33.0M. crassitesta: Japan: mean of 2 samples16
20.0M. viridis: India: single batch17

Selected value

Edible flesh (raw) 24%

Data based on yield of cooked meats (sources 1 and 6) should be excluded, as should those of source 3, which include the shell liquor in the edible portion. The remaining data, which still vary from 16.50 to 33, are averaged to give the selected value: this value is in good agreement with the only seasonal survey (Source 2).

Composition

ProteinFatGlycogenCommentsSource
14.1–21.0 mean 18.52.6–3.5 mean 3.11.2–5.8 mean 3.1Mytilus edulis: USA: cultivated stock: opened by steaming: sampled 10 months of year1
10.00–14.56 mean 12.701.30–3.04
mean 1.94
1.08–7.20
mean 3.15
M. edulis: Spain: studied over range of grounds and seasons2
9.921.97 M. edulis: India:includes shell liquor3
10.851.482.60M. edulis: Spain: means of wild and cultivated stocks4
20.422.010.95M. edulis: India5
15.312.542.71M. edulis: USA7
10.9–13.72.55M. edulis: Korea8
11.82.882.65M. edulis: USA9
9.661.741.88M. edulis: UK: mean of 500 shellfish caught over 2 complete years10
 2.7 M. edulis: India11
12.13–13.822.24–2.558.31–10.58M. edulis: India12
 2.0 M. edulis: UK: mean of 6 samples over a year13
10.51.62.8M. edulis: Korea14
8.71.14.1M. edulis: USA15
15.020.421.54M. crassitesta: Japan: means of 2 samples16
12.991.70 M. viridis: India: single batch17

Selected values

Protein 11.2%
Fat 1.8%
Glycogen 2.5%

As in the yield calculation, sources 1 and 3 are excluded. There are two complete partial surveys, sources 2 and 10, and these are averaged to give the selected values. Among the other data, only the protein value of source 5 and the glycogen content from source 12 are in conflict with the selected values.

Sources

  1. Slabyj, B.M., Creamer, D.L. and True, R.H. Seasonal effect on yield, proximate composition and quality of blue mussel, Mytilus edulis, meats obtained from cultivated and natural stock. Mar. Fish. Rev. 40 (8) 18–23 (1978)

  2. Molins, L.R. and Rial, J.R.B. Chemical studies of the mussel (Mytilus edulis) of the Vigo estuary. Bol. Inst. Esp. Oceanogr. 87 1–13 (1957)

  3. Chari, S.T. Nutritive value of some of the west coast marine food fishes of the Madras Province. Ind. J. Med. Res. 36 253–259 (1948)

  4. Fraga, F. Seasonal variation in the chemical composition of mussel (Mytilus edulis). I. Invest. Pesq. 4 109–125 (1956)

  5. Suryanarayanan, H. and Alexander, K.M. Biochemical investigations on edible molluscs of Kerala. 1. A study on the nutritional value of some bivalves. Fishery Technol. 9 42–47 (1972)

  6. George, C. and Nair, M.R. Technological aspects of preservation and processing of edible shellfish. Conference Proceedings. Handling, processing and marketing tropical fish (Tropical Products Institute, London, 1977) pp 413–416

  7. Field, I.A. The food value of sea mussels. Bull. US Bureau of Fisheries 29 85–128 (1909)

  8. Choi, W.H. Studies on the variation in chemical constituents of the sea mussel, Mytilus edulis. Bull. Korean Fisheries Soc. 3 38–44 (1970)

  9. Slabyj, B.M. and Carpenter, P.N. Processing effect on proximate composition and mineral content of meats of blue mussel (Mytilus edulis) J. Fd Sci. 42 1153–1155 (1977)

  10. Williams, C.S. The effect of Mytilicola intestinalis on the biochemical composition of mussels. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K. 49 161–173 (1969)

  11. Gopakumar, K. and Nair, M.R. Fatty acid composition of eight species of Indian marine fish. J. Sci. Fd Agric. 23 493–496 (1972)

  12. Chinnamma, P.L., Chaudhuri, D.R. and Pillai, V.K. Fishery Technol. 7 137–142 (1970)

  13. Torry Research Station. Unpublished data

  14. Lee, E.-H. et al. Bull. Korean Fisheries Soc. 13 23–26 (1980)

  15. Clark, E.D. and Clough, R.W. Nutritive value of fish and shellfish. Bureau of Fisheries Document No 1000 (Department of Commerce, Washington, 1926) pp 502–526

  16. Takagi, I. and Simidu, W. Studies on muscle of aquatic animals - XXXV. Seasonal variation of chemical constituents and extractive nitrogens in some species of shellfish. Bull. Jap. Soc. Sci. Fish. 29 66–70 (1963)

  17. Saralaya, K.V. and Nagaraj, A.S. Studies on the utilisation of shell fishes of Karnataka coast by canning. Mysore J. Agric. Sci. 12 484–490 (1978)

BLUE WHITING

Micromesistius poutassou 1,48(04)033,01

and

SOUTHERN BLUE WHITING

Micromesistius australis 1,48(04)033,02

These two species are treated together, as they are very closely related and little data are available on southern blue whiting.

Yield

FilletEdible FleshCommentsSource
 43.9Micromesistius poutassou: edible flesh by deboning machine1
 35.1M. poutassou: edible flesh by deboning machine2
20.1   
25.7 M. poutassou: skinless: 
28.4 hand filleted2
31.7   
32.3 M. Poutassou: skinless: caught February to June3
 56.7M. poutassou: includes skin4
 58.2M. poutassou: includes skin5
 59.2M. australis: includes skin4
 51.5M. australis: includes skin5
 51.2M. australis: skinless6
48.1 M. australis: skinless7

Selected values

Skinless fillets 28%
Edible flesh 49%

The fillet yield from source 7 appears relatively high and may represent total edible flesh rather than commercial fillet yield. The mean of the remaining figures is selected. The values for flesh with skin are reduced by 5% and combined with the remaining data to give the flesh yield.

Composition

ProteinFatCommentsSource
16.1 Micromesistius poutassou2
18.50.27M. poutassou: 26 or 29 samples caught over several years and seasons4
17.10.4M. poutassou5
18.10.8M. poutassou8
171.8M. poutassou9
18.70.7M. poutassou10
22.30.4M. poutassou11
16.40.3M. poutassou12
18.2 M. poutassou: mean of 5 fish13
17.9 February
April       ý M. poutassou: probably washed
14
14.1  
19.10.4M. poutassou: English Channel: means of 10 fish caught at same time15
17.4–19.4
mean 18.2
0.1–0.5
mean 0.3
M. australis: S. America: caught May, and August to December16
15.21.5M. australis5
16.50.55M. australis (probably)6
17.30.59M. australis: New Zealand7

Selected values

Protein 18.4%
Fat 0.3%

Two sets of data, from sources 4 and 16, cover an extended catching period. Almost all the other data appear to refer to fish caught on one occasion only. The two extensive sets are in good agreement, although for different species, and their averages have been taken as the selected values.

Sources

  1. Christians, O. and Ritter, K. Private communication

  2. Torry Research Station. Unpublished data

  3. Whittle, K.J., Robertson, I. and McDonald I. Seasonal variability in blue whiting (Micromesistius poutassou) and its influence on processing. Advances in Fish Science and Technology. ed. J.J. Connell (Fishing News Books, 1980) pp 378–387

  4. Minder, L.P. and Gritskevich, K.I. Food and technical value of blue whiting. Trudy PINRO 36 91–106 (1975)

  5. Bykov, V.P. Marine Fishes (Russian Translation Series 7, A.A.Balkema, Rotterdam, 1985) pp 112–113

  6. Kizevetter, I.V. Technological and chemical characteristics of commercial fish of the Pacific Ocean basin (TNIRO, Vladivostok, 1971) p 186

  7. Kakuda, K. and Kitagawa, S. Objective and sensory tests for food quality and freezing stability of fish caught by the ‘Kaiyo-Maru’, a stern trawler II. Bull. Tokai Reg. Fish. Res. Lab. No 100, 53–65 (1979)

  8. Dagbjartsson, B. Utilization of blue whiting, Micromesistius poutassou, for human consumption. J. Fish. Res. Bd, Can. 32 747–751 (1975)

  9. Svensson, S. Stabilization of fish mince from gadoid species by pretreatment of the fish. Advances in Fish Science and Technology. ed. J.J. Connell (Fishing News Books, 1980) pp 226–232

  10. Bussmann, B. Evaluation of the processing characteristics of blue whiting. Lebensmittelchemie und Gerichtliche Chemie 32 86 (1978)

  11. Bussmann, B. Tests on new processing possibilities for blue whiting. Allgemeine Fischwirtschaftszeitung 29(18) 4–5 (1977)

  12. Kuzmicheva, G.M. and Rekhina, N.I. The effect of stabilizers on the amount of soluble protein in fish mince. Ryb. Khoz. No 10, 71–73 (1977)

  13. Karl, H. Canning of blue whiting (II). Fleischwirtsch. 64 487–489 (1984)

  14. Afolabi, O.A., Oke, O.L. and Whittle, K.J. Quality assessment of laminated fillet blocks from blue whiting (Micromesistius poutassou). Food Chem. 13 277–284 (1984)

  15. Podsevalov, V.N., Pavlova, J.L. and Utrobina, A.A. Chemical composition of some Atlantic fish. Trudy Atlant NIRO 16 3–27 (1966)

  16. Podsevalov, V.N. and Perova, L.I. Technochemical characteristics of some Atlantic species of fish. Trudy Atlant NIRO 52 146–164 (1973)

BOMBAY DUCK

Harpodon nehereus1, 32(11)001,02

Yield

FilletEdible FleshCommentsSource
 73.4probably includes skin and bones: mean of 18 fish1,2
 78.0probably includes skin and bone3

Selected values

Skinless fillets-
Edible flesh 57%

No data are available on fillet yield and it seems likely that no figure is required since Bombay duck has an exceptionally high water content and is very soft and so is unlikely ever to be consumed as fillets, either with or without skin. The collected values probably relate to the fish prepared for sun drying, i.e. beheaded and eviscerated. With this assumption it is possible to calculate the edible flesh by analogy with the related lizard fish, for which more complete data are given in source 1.

Composition

ProteinFatCommentsSource
8.20.11 fish analysed1,2
9.05  3
 0.350 4
9.290.49 5
 0.3–0.4 6
8.54  7

Selected values

Protein 8.8%
Fat 0.3%

The selected values are means of all the data. They are provisional in the absence of any seasonal survey which might indicate the variability of composition.

Sources

  1. Bykov, V.P. Marine Fishes. (Russian Translation Series 7, A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, 1985) p292

  2. Bykov, V.P. Technological studies on some fish species from the Indian Ocean. Trudy VNIRO 72 123–142 (1971)

  3. Setna, S.B., Sarangdhar, P.N. and Ganpule, N.V. Nutritive values of some marine fishes of Bombay. Indian J. Med. Res. 32 171–176 (1944)

  4. Patakoot, R.S., Pradhan, L.B. and Murti, N.N. Fat content of the muscles of some marine fishes of Bombay. J. Univ. Bombay 18(5B) 3–6 (1950)

  5. Nazir, D.J. and Magar, N.G. Chemical composition of Bombay ducks (Harpodon nehereus) and changes occurring in the nutritive value of dried Bombay ducks on storage. Fishery Technol. 2 170–179 (1965)

  6. Sen, D.P. Fish protein concentrate from Bombay duck (Harpodon nehereus) fish: effect of processing variables on the nutritional and organoleptic qualities. Fd Technol. 23 683–688 (1969)

  7. Radhakrishnan, A.G., Solanki, K.K. and Venkataraman, R. Preliminary studies on freezing characteristics of Bombay duck (Harpodon nehereus). Fishery Technol. 10 124–130 (1973)

CAPELIN

Mallotus villosus1,23(04)002,01

Yield

Fillet Edible Flesh Comments Source
40.4–69.3
Mean 57.8
Spring
Skin-on1
55.4–66.8
Mean 62.2
57.4–63.3
Mean 61.0
Autumn
Winter
Mean 58.3

Selected values

Skinless fillets 57%
Edible flesh 60%

Value for skinless fillets is obtained by averaging the data from source 1 and subtracting 5% to correct for presence of skin. Figure for total edible flesh is derived by analogy with other species. It is consistent with the data given in source 1 for the yield of “body”, averaging 66.9%. “Body” includes skin, bone and fins.

Composition

Protein Fat Comments Source
14.5–16.0
Mean 15.6
1.48–4.11
Mean 2.72
Springmeat and skin 1
12.8–16.8
Mean 15.0
4.6–22.5
Mean 11.4
Summer
12.4–15.6
Mean 14.4
8.9–23.2
Mean 13.4
Autumn
13.0–15.8
Mean 14.6
5.4–10.6
Mean 8.3
Winter
14.96 mean of 30 fishJune: Canada2
 2.8mean of 54 fish
14.2–17.0
12.6–16.4
13.2–16.2
2.1–4.3
2.1–4.4
7.6–15.2
April
May
June, July
3

Selected values

Protein 14.9%
Fat 5.9%

Values are simple averages of all the data above. Much more extensive analytical data are available on whole fish, because capelin has in the past been caught mainly for fish meal; these data are summarised in source 4.

Sources

  1. Konstantinova, L.L. and Minder, L.P. On the question of the chemical composition and biochemical properties of capelin. Trudy PINRO No 36, 125–139 (1975)

  2. MacCallum, W.A., Adams, D.R., Ackman, R.G., Ke, P.J., Dyer, W.J., Fraser, D.I. and Punjamapirom, S. Newfoundland capelin: proximate composition. J. Fish. Res. Bd. Canada 26 2027–2035 (1969)

  3. Kizevetter, I.V. Technological and chemical characteristics of commercial fish of the Pacific Ocean Basin (TNIRO, Vladivostok, 1971) p127

  4. Jangaard, P.M. The capelin (Mallotus villosus). Biology, distribution, exploitation, utilization and composition. Bulletin of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada No 186 (Fisheries and Marine Service, Ottawa, 1976)

CHARACINS

Characidae1, 38(01)xxx,xx

Characins include a very large number of genera in South America and Africa. The data collected is limited to Bolivia and at least one of the species listed is often ascribed to a different, but related family, Curimatidae.

Yield

Fillet Edible Flesh Comments Source
34.54 Prochilodus platensis: skinless1
45.4 Prochilodus platensis: skinless2
44.2 Colossoma macropomum: skinless2
39.4 Colossoma brachypomum: skinless2
27.1 Rhaphiodon vulpinnus: skinless2
39.3 Serrasalmus naterri: skinless2

Selected values

Skinless fillets[38%]
Edible flesh[57%]

The skinless fillet figure is the mean of the data collected. The edible flesh value is a likely maximum figure at 50% over the skinless fillet value.

Composition

Protein Fat Comments Source
16.63–21.50
mean 19.63
0.11–2.23
mean 1.01
Prochilodus platensis1
23.384.26Prochilodus platensis2
14.1118.02Colossoma macropomum2
15.8415.61Colossoma brachypomum2
15.0513.39Rhaphiodon vulpinnus2

Selected values

Protein[17.6%]
Fat [10.5%]

The values selected are simple means of the available data. This is clearly an unsatisfactory position because of the wide variation between species, both in fat content and protein content. Prochilodus is very probably lower in fat and higher in protein content than the other species. If it were possible to separately identify the contribution of Prochilodus to catch statistics, separate values could be derived for it.

Sources

  1. Curran, C.A., Ames, G.R. and Hones, N.S.D. Frozen storage life of the Bolivian fish, sabalo (Prochilodus platensdia). J. Fd Technol. 21 471–475 (1986)

  2. Nicolaides, L. and Poulter, N.H. Preliminary studies on the ice storage characteristics and composition of Bolivian freshwater fish. 1. Altiplano basin fish: 2. Amazon and Parana basin fish. J. Fd Technol. 20 437–449, 451–465 (1985)

CHUB MACKEREL

Scomber japonicus1,75(01)002,01

Yield

FilletEdible FleshCommentsSource
 57.6
61.4
Means of ranges at two seasons1
 50.0–62.2
mean 57.0
Values from 4 regions2
 81.8
 52–65
 56.6
 55.8 3
 54.4 4
45.5 probably skinless5
 62.0flesh and skin : 17 fish6
47.2  13

Selected values

Skinless fillets 46%
Edible flesh 57%

For skinless fillets, the two available yield figures have been averaged; the result is consistent with that for other species. The edible flesh figure is the mean of all data above, with exceptions that the extreme value, 81.8, has been omitted, and the value from source 6 has been reduced by 10% to correct for presence of skin.,

Composition

ProteinFatCommentsSource
20.6–23.2
mean 18.7
   
 12.0mean of 43 fish8
23.02.1means of 6 fish, caught at same time5
20.53.2 3
21.288.20probably a single fish9
19.87.6means of 4 fish, caught at same time10
16.1–24.3
mean 20.2
0.8–32.8
mean 10.3
ranges and means of fish from 5 grounds: different periods of year for each ground1
20.78.3means from 4 grounds, probably over extended period2
 2.8–18.9
mean 10.6
range and mean of 23 fish: caught in 8 months of year11
 7.5mean of 8 fish: caught in 3 months of year12
 8.5mean of 27 fish: caught in 4 month of year14

Selected values

Protein 20.4%
Fat 9.5%

The selected value for protein content is the mean of those from sources 1 and 2: all other data are consistent, but relate to small number of fish. Fat is taken as the mean of data from sources 1, 2, 8, 11, 14, which studied fish over an extended period.

Sources

  1. Kizevetter, I.V. Technological and chemical characteristics of commercial fish of the Pacific Ocean Basin (TNIRO, Vladivostok, 1971) p227

  2. Bykov, V.P. Marine Fishes. (Russian Translation Series 7, A.A. Blakema, Rotterdam, 1985) pp222–223

  3. Maciejczyk, J. Technological value of Peruvian fish. Przemysl Spozywczy 28 305–308 (1975)

  4. Miwa, K., Sato, Y. and Kinoshita, E. Studies on the utilization of migratory fish - II, on the constituent parts of body of saury and their chemical components. Bull. Hokkaido Reg. Fish. Res. Lab. 19 66–71 (1958)

  5. Pickston, L., Czochanska, Z. and Smith, J.M. The nutritional composition of some New Zealand marine fish. New Zealand Journal of Science 25 19–26 (1982)

  6. Golovin, A.N. Technological properties of some species of fish from the South East part of the Pacific Ocean. Ryb. Khoz. No.8, 69–71 (1977)

  7. Simmonds, C.K., and Tanner, K.R.O. Analysis of South African commercial fish species. Ann. Rep. Fishing Industry Research Institute 34 51–52 (1980)

  8. Simmonds, C.K. and Heydenrych, C. Composition of South African commercial fish species. Ann. Rep. Fishing Industry Research Institute 38 72 (1984)

  9. Jaffé, W.G. The food value of fresh fish, fish preserves and fishmeal. Z. Lebensmitt. Untersuch. Forsch. 113 472–479 (1960)

  10. Paetow, A., Schober, B. Papenfuss, H.J. The chemical composition and organoleptic quality of fish from West Africa fishing grounds. Fischerei-Forschung 4 99–101 (1966)

  11. Ueda, T. Changes in the fatty acid composition of mackerel lipid and probably related factors - I. Influence of the season, body length and lipid content. Bull. Jap. Soc. Sci. Fish 42 489–484 (1976)

  12. Ono, T., Nagayama, F. and Yamada, T. Studies on the fat metabolism of fish - II. Contents of fat and cholic acid in the liver of Pacific mackerel. Bull. Jap. Soc. Sci. Fish. 24 862–864 (1959)

  13. Tulsner, M. The technological properties and processing possibilities of important Northwest African commercial fish species. Fischerei-Forschung Wissenschaftliche Schriftenreihe, 3 55–63 (1965)

  14. Dill, D. B. A chemical study of certain Pacific coast fishes. J. Biol. Chem. 48 73–82 (1921)

CLAMS

The following species and groups come within the scope of this study.

 OCEAN QUAHOG 
Artica islandica  3,17(04)045,01
  SURF CLAM 
Spisula solidissima  3,17(04)045,01
  STRIPED VENUS 
Venus gallina  3,17(11)004,05
  JAPANESE (= MANILA) CLAM 
Venerupis japonica  3,17(11)018,01
  SHORT NECK CLAMS 
Paphia spp  3,17(11)041,xx
  HARD CLAM 
Mercenaria mercenaria  3,17(11)075,01
  JAPANESE CLAM 
Corbicula japonica  3,17(21)025,02

Since species of several families are included in the collected data, the selected values of yield and composition will be adequate for the additional category:

CLAMS, NEI

Bivalvia 3,99

Much of the data collected relate to species other than those above.

Yield

Meat Comments Source
20.3Arctica islandica: mean value at different locations1
8.15Cardium edule2
30.0Spisula solidissima1
10.2Meretrix meretrix: mean of values for 2 sizes3
7.62–17.72
mean 11.22
Meretrix casta: mean of 28 samples over complete year4
21.4Venerupis semidecussata: mean of 5 batches at different times5
10.1Mercenaria mercenaria: mean of 2 baches6
20.5Donax spp7
20Corbicula leana: mean of 2 batches5
32.4Corbicula fluminea7
11.0–20.4
mean 15.0
Corbicula sandai: 10 monthly samples8

Selected values

Edible flesh       [18%]

Two extensive surveys have been found (Sources 4 and 8): neither is of a prominent species. Variation within a species (shown by the two surveys) and between species is unusually high, partly, because a number of different families are involved, because the nature of the edible flesh is not defined, and because of seasonal variation in gonad size. The selected value is the mean of all the data, but is provisional because of the lack of a proper survey of a major species.

Composition

Protein Fat Glycogen Comments Source
 0.560.13
 muscle
hepatopancreas  ý Arctica islandica
9
11.81.0 Cardium carbis: mean of 10 specimens10
 0.71 Mactra sulcataria11
11.70.3 Spisula solidissima12
15.60.34 S.solidissima: mean of 20 specimens13
 0.88 S.solidissima: mean of 9 specimens14
 1.2 Venus spp15
10.940.672.68Meretrix lusoria16
 0.82 Meretrix meretrix lusoria11
11.921.114.74Meretrix meretrix: carbohydrate by difference3
7.98–12.29
mean 9.80
0.50–1.89
mean 0.88
 Meretrix casta: means of 28 samples over complete year4
13.341.401.86Venerupis semidecussata: means of 5 batches at different times5
12.250.883.07Tapes japonica16
10.1  Tapes japonica17
 0.77 Tapes japonica11
13.01.23 Saxidomus nuttalli(= giganteus): means of 525 specimens in 21 batches10
13.51.0 Protothaca staminea: 1 specimen10
 0.5 Protothaca staminea: mean of 45 specimens18
10.70.3 Mercenaria mercenaria12
 0.38 Mercenaria mercenaria: means of 8 samples14
4.410.21 Mercenaria mercenaria: means of 19 or 20 samples13
9.701.18 Mercenaria mercenaria6
8.811.69 Donax spp7
9.511.27 Mya arenaria: means of 20 samples13
 2.18 Mya arenaria: means of 7 samples14
15.03.2 Panope (= Panopea) generosa: means of 7 specimens10
 0.89 Corbicula japonica11
11.131.604.78Corbicula japonica16
6.211.55 Corbicula fluminea7
7.660.84 Corbicula leana: means of 2 batches5
8.0–12.8
mean 9.76
1.8–3.5
mean 2.5
5.1–8.5
mean 6.4
Corbicula sandai: 10 monthly samples8

Selected values

Protein 10.8%
Fat 1.1%
Glycogen3.9%

As in the case of yield, only two extensive surveys have been found, both of minor species. Again as for yield, variability is quite high and no species differences are noticeable. The selected values are means of all the data.

Sources

  1. Bakal, A., Rathjen, W.F., and Mendelsohn, J. Ocean quahog takes supply limelight as surf clam dwindles. Food Product Development 12(1) 70–78 (1978)

  2. Waterman, J.J. Measures, stowage rates and yields of fishery products. Torry Advisory Note No.17. (Torry Research Station, Aberdeen, 1964)

  3. Sarayala, K.V., and Nagaraj, A.S. Studies on the utilisation of shellfishes of Karnataka coast by canning. Mysore J. Agric. Sci. 12 484–490 (1978)

  4. Venkataraman, R., and Chari, S.T. Studies on oysters and clams: biochemical variations. Indian J. Med. Res. 39 533–541 (1951)

  5. Takagi, I. and Simidu, W. Studies on muscle of aquatic animals - XXXV. Seasonal variation o chemical consitituents and extractive nitrogens in some species of shellfish. Bull. Jap. Soc. Sci. Fish. 29 66–70 (1963)

  6. Anthony, J.E. et al. Yeilds, proximate composition and mineral content of finfish and shellfish. J. Fd. Sci. 48 313–314, 316 (1983)

  7. Intengan, C.L. et al. Composition of Philippine foods, V. Philippines J. of Science 85 203–213 (1956)

  8. Higashi, S. Seasonal variations in the chemical components of the principal molluscs in Lake Biwa-ko. Hull. Jap. Soc. Sci. Fish. 31 610–618 (1965)

  9. Ackman, R.G., Epstein, S. and Kelleher, M. A comparison of lipids and fatty acids of the ocean quahaug, (Arctica islandica), from Nova Scotia and New Brunswick. J. Fish. Res. Bd Canada 31 1803–1811 (1974)

  10. Stansby, M.E. Chemical characteristics of fish caught in the northeast Pacific Ocean. Mar. Fish. Rev. 38(9) 1–11 (1976)

  11. Shimma, Y. Taguchi, H. A comprative study on fatty acid composition of shellfish. Bull. Jap. Soc. Sci. Fish. 30 153–160 (1964)

  12. Sidwell, V.D. and Ambrose, M.E. Nutritional and chemical evaluation of the protein of various finfish and shellfish. Protein Nutritional Quality of Foods and Feeds, Part 2. ed. Friedman, M (Marcel Dekker, 1975) pp 197–209

  13. Sidwell, V.D., Bonnet, J.C. and Zook, E.G. Chemical and nutritive values of several fresh and canned finfish, crustaceans and molluscs. Part I: Proximate composition, calcium and phosphorus. Mar. Fish. Rev. 35(12) 16–19 (1973)

  14. Bonnet, J.C., Sidwell V.D. and Zook, E.G. Chemical and nutritive values of several fresh and canned finfish, crustaceans and molluscs. Part II: Fatty acid composition. Mar. Fish. Rev. 36(2) 8–14 (1974)

  15. Exler, J. and Weihrauch, J.L. Comprehensive evaluation of fatty acids in foods. XII. Shellfish. J. Amer. Diet. Assoc. 71 518–521 (1977)

  16. Suyama, M. and Sekine, Y. Studies on the amino acid composition of shellfish proteins. Bull. Jap. Soc. Soc. Fish. 31 634–637 (1965)

  17. Konosu, S. et al. Constituents of the extracts and amino acid composition ot the protein of short necked clam (Tapes japonica). Bull. Japn. Soc. Sci. Fish. 31 680–686 (1965)

  18. Gruger, E.H., Nelson, R.W. and Stansby, M.E. Fatty acid composition of oils from 21 species of marine fish, freshwater fish and shellfish. J. Amer. Oil Chem. Soc. 41 662–667 (1964)

COMMON CARP

Cypinus carpio 1,40(02)002,01

Other categories included in this monograph are:

FRESHWATER BREAM

Abramis brama 1,40(02)001,02

and

CYPRINIDS NEI

Cyprinidae1,40(02)xxx,xx

Yield

Fillet Edible Flesh Comments Source
32.6 Cyprinus carpio: mean of 6 fish3
45.2 C. carpio4
28.440.0C. carpio: edible flesh by deboning machine5
43.6 C. carpio6
27.7 C. carpio: mean of 41 fish from 3 different sources7
31.6 C. carpio: mean of 2 fish8
43.0 C. carpio: includes skin: mean of 3 fish9
50.8 C. carpio: includes skin10
55.0 Ctenopharyngodon idella: includes skin10
52.7 Hypophthalmichthys molitrix: includes skin10
34.6 H. molitrix: mean of 7 fish3

Selected values

Skinless fillets 36%
Edible flesh [54%]

A very wide range of values for fillet yield is available. Those from source 10 appear extreme and are excluded. After correcting the source 9 result for presence of skin, the overall mean is taken as the selected value. The single value for total edible flesh in collected data look a little low. The selected value is derived by applying a likely maximum 50% increase to the selected fillet value.

Composition

Protein Fat Comments Source
17.82.6Abramis brama: 2 batches (20 and 10 fish) in different years<1
20.62.9
19.11.32A. brama2
16.79.2Cyprinus carpio: means of 6 fish3
15.952.09C. carpio4
17.20.8C. carpio: different feeding histories6
16.58.0
17.95.1C. carpio: means of 47 fish from 3 different sources7
 2.0C. carpio: mean of 2 fish8
17.16.8C. carpio: mean of 3 fish9
16.910.9C. carpio10
16.32.38C. carpio11
18.64.5C. carpio12
17.94.2Ctenopharyngodon idella10
18.53.4Hypophthalmichthys molitrix10
16.76.4H. molitrix: mean of 7 fish3

Selected values

Protein 17.5%
Fat 4.7%

Like other species, carps can be expected to show seasonal variation in composition. In addition, however, as commonly cultivated species, their composition will be influenced by the nature and amount of feed supplied (as indicated by the data of source 6). Some data have been omitted from the table above as they refer to the results of experimental feeding. The selected values are means of all the data. Since fish given supplementary feed tend to have higher fat contents than wild or unfed fish, the selected value is probably low in relation to the mean fat content of fish currently consumed.

Sources

  1. Jarzynova, B. The influence of the tape worm Ligula intestinalis (L) on the chemical composition of bream - Abramis brama (L). Roczniki Nauk Rolniczych 93 (Series H) 35–46 (1971)

  2. Ziecik, M. and Konopa, T. Protein and fat changes during storage of frozen bream (Abramis brama) fillets at -30°C. Zeszyty Naukowe Wyzszej Szkoly Rolniczej w Szczecinie No 35, 155–170 (1971)

  3. Angel, S. and Baker, R.C. A study of the composition of three popular varities of fish in Israel, with a view towards further processing. J. Fd. Technol. 12 27–35 (1977)

  4. Poulter, N.H. and Nicolaides, L. Quality changes in Bolivian freshwater fish species during storage in ice. FAO Fisheries Report No. 317, Supplement (1985). Spoilage of tropical fish and product development. pp 11–28

  5. Naidu, Y.M. Composition and stability of mechanically deboned carp (Cyprinus carpio) with emphasis on lipids and texture during frozen storage. Diss. Abs. 44(12) 3581 (1984)

  6. Steffen, W. Chemical composition and butritive value of carp flesh. Die Nahrung 18 789–794 (1974)

  7. Thurston, C.E. et al. Composition of certain species of freshwater fish II. Comparative data for 21 species of lake and river fish. Food Res. 24 493–502 (1959)

  8. Kinsella, J.E. et al. Sterol, phospholipid, mineral content and proximate composition of fillets of selected freshwater fish species. J. Fd. Biochem. 1 131–140 (1977)

  9. Torry Research Station. Unpublished data

  10. Okoniewska, Z. and Okoniewski, Z. Preliminary results of investigations on the weight of commercially useful body parts and chemical composition of plant-feeding fish and carp. Roczniki Nauk Rolniczych 91 (Series H) 385–401 (1969)

  11. Vlasova, G.B. and Skrebnitskaya, L.K. Chemical composition of muscles of certain fishes of the carp family. Uzbek. Biol. Zhurnal 16(4) 62–64 (1972)

  12. Dugal, L.C. Proximate composition of some freshwater fish. Fisheries Research Board of Canada, Biological Station, London, Ontario, Circular No. 5, 1–6 (1962)

DAGAAS

Stolothrissa, Limnothrissa spp 1,21(05)xxx,xx

Yield

No data have been found on yield.

Selected values

Skinless fillets -
Edible flesh [63%]

Dagaas are mainly sun-dried. It is unlikely that fillets will be a significant form in consumption, so no figure has been proposed. The tentative value for total edible flesh is based on other small Clupeid species.

Composition

Protein Fat Comments Source
16.23.1Probably relates to whole fish1

Selected values

Protein [16.2%]
Fat [3.1%]

The only values found probably relate to whole fish since the ‘ash’ figure quoted is fairly high. The source is a secondary one; the original source has not been seen.

Source

1. FAO/US Dept. of Health, Education and Welfare. Food composition table for use in Africa. (1968) p 207

DENTEX, SEABREAMS, ETC, NEI

Sparidae1,70(39)xxx,xx

and

SILVER SEABREAM

Chrysophrys major1,70(39)121,08

An unusually large amount of data is available on Sparidae, perhaps because the family includes a fair number of different genera and a number of individually high-valued species. In order to cope readily with this quantity of data, two constraints have been applied. Firstly, only the more important genera have been included in the listed data: these are Pagellus, Dentex, Chrysophrys, Sparus (Pagrus) and Boops. Secondly, data from a single source for different species within a genus have been combined into a single mean and, where appropriate, range entry.

Yield

Fillet Edible Flesh Comments Source
40.050.6Pagellus: 4 species: fillet yield probably includes skin1
40.3 Pagellus: 2 species: skinless6
40–52 Dentex: 4 species: probably includes skin1
37.8 D. filosus: skinless6
 51.8D. vulgaris (= dentex)8
36.2–58.7 Chrysophrys major: includes skin1
32.7 Chrysophrys auratus: skinless: mean of 6 fish10
42 Pagrus (= Sparus) ehrenbergii: skinless6
 57.44Sparus berda: skinless13
 56.2Box (= Boops) boops8

Selected values

Skinless fillets 40%
Edible flesh 54%

The skinless fillet yield is the mean of the data, omitting those in which presence or absence of skin is uncertain, and correcting for presence of skin where appropriate. The total edible flesh value is the mean of all the data.

Composition

ProteinFatCommentsSource
17.0–22.5
mean 20.5
0.7–4.7
mean 2.2
Pagellus: 4 species1
20.750.90P. lithognathus: means of 6 fish2
16.801.80Pagellus: 2 species: total of 12 fish3
16.221.76Pagellus: 2 species: 2 fish4
22.100.22P. coupei5
20.32.6Pagellus: 4 species6
19.230.46P. natalensis7
17.7–23.2
mean 20.3
1.0–5.8
mean 3.2
Dentex: 4 species1
18.5–20.3
mean 19.4
0.6–1.9
mean 1.2
Dentex: 4 species6
20.441.08Dentex: 2 species: one species sampled quarterly2
21.43.51D. vulgaris (= dentex)8
17.733.51D. dentex9
20.251.65Chrysophrys major1
19.41.6Chrysophrys auratus: means of 6 fish10
20.300.49Chrysophrys auratus: means of 10 fish11
23.131.15Chrysophrys haffara12
18.1–22.8
mean 20.6
0.2–6.3
mean 1.8
Sparus: 7 species1
20.441.14Pagrus (= Sparus): 4 species: means of 6 fish of each species2
20.42.3Pagrus (= Sparus): 3 species6
20.301.49Pagrus (= Sparus) Pagrus: means of 8 fish11
20.882.12Sparus: 2 species7
 3.24S. aurata: mean of 4 seasons14
17.131.38S. cantabricus: 2 fish4
19.950.66S. berda15
21.850.51S. berda13
20.40.17S. berda16
19.54.1Box (= Boops) boops1
18.6010.06Box (= Boops) boops: means of 4 fish3
19.282.71Box (= Boops) boops: means of 2 fish4
19.15.93Box (= Boops) boops8

Selected values

Protein 19.9%
Fat 2.2%

The data for Box boops might be taken to indicate a higher fat content than for the other genera and species considered. However individual measurements for other species (as in some of the data of source 1) are also moderately high and, on balance, Box boops has been included in the overall means selected.

Sources

  1. Bykov, V.P. Marine Fishes. (Russian Translation Series 7, A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, 1985) pp 261–281

  2. van Wyk, G.F. South African fish products. Part VIII. Composition of the flesh of Cape fishes. J. Soc. Chem. Ind. (Trans.) 63 367–371 (1944)

  3. de las Heras, A.R. and Mendez Isla, M.C. Contribution to chemical studies of some Spanish fish. Ann. Bromatol. 4 403–410 (1952)

  4. Gimenez, J.C. and de las Heras, A.R. Chemical studies of some Spanish fish. Trabajos No 17, Instituto Espanol de Oceanografia, Madrid (1943)

  5. Diouf, N. et al. Study of the preservation of sardinella and seabream by ice and chilled sea water. FAO Fisheries Report No 268, Proceedings of the FAO expert consultation on fish technology in Africa (1982) pp 15–26

  6. Tulsner, M. The technological properties and processing possibilities of important north west African commercial fish species. Fischerei-Forschung, Wissenschaftliche Schriftenreihe 3 55–63 (1965)

  7. Yaroslavtseva, L.D. Technochemical properties of some Indian Ocean fish. Ryb. Khoz. No 1 60–64 (1966)

  8. Carteni, A. and Aloj, G. Chemical composition of marine animals of the gulf of Naples. Quaderni della Nutrizione 1 49–63 (1934/35)

  9. Ciusa, W. and Giaccio, M. Relation between nutritive value and market price of some important marine species of the Abruzzi coast. Quaderni di Merceologia 8 1–40 (1969)

  10. Vlieg, P. Proximate analysis of commercial New Zealand fish species-3. New Zealand J. Technol. 1 181–185 (1985)

  11. Popa, G. et al. Contributions to the veterinary inspection of sea fish. Revista de zootehnie si medicina veterinara 8 (7) 87–90 (1968)

  12. Hanna, R.G.M. Proximate composition of certain Red Sea fishes. Mar.Fish. Rev. 46 (3) 71–75 (1984)

  13. Sulit, J.I. et al. Proximate chemical composition of various species of Philippine market fishes. Philippine J. Fisheries 2 109–122 (1953)

  14. El-Sayed, M.M. et al. Biochemical studies on the lipid content of Tilapia nilotica and Sparus auratus. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 79B 589–594 (1984)

  15. Das, K. et al. Biochemical studies on some commercially important fish of Shatt Al-Arab and the Gulf. Conference proceedings, Handling, processing and marketing of tropical fish. (Tropical Products Institute, London, 1977) pp 157–161

  16. Intengan, C.L. et al. Composition of Philippine foods, V. Philippine J. Sci. 85 203–213 (1956)


Previous Page Top of Page Next Page