Previous Page Table of Contents


3. APPENDIXES

APPENDIX 1

1 PRA Workshop Agenda (2 1/2 days)

Day 1

· Introductions - Sum Governor; participants
· Objectives and context of workshop
· Introduction to PRA:
history
features
principles
methods
context of PRA in Mongolia
· Practical Session: Attitudes and Behaviour
· Practical Session: Semi-structured Interviewing skills
Day 2
· Review of previous day
· Practical Session: Mapping
· Practical Session: Matrix scoring
Day 3
· Session: Seasonal calendar and daily routine on gender
· Practical Session: SWOT analysis group exercise
· Final discussion and summary
APPENDIX 2

Workshops participants, Chuluut sum, Arkhangai aimag, 28th to 30th August 1995.

1. Dashzeveg

governor

2. Balgansuren

head of governor's office

3. Baljinnyam

deputy governor

4. Machgalsuren

bag 1 governor

5. Mijiddorj

bag 3 governor

6. Biziadorj

bag 2 governor

7. Ganbaatar

bag 4 governor

8. Tsetsejmaa

doctor

9. Batdorj

nature protection inspector

10. Byambasuren

social insurance inspector

11. Selenge

representative of poor in sum centre

12. Davaasuren

herder

13. Zul-Ochir

herder

14. Mijiddorj. O

tractor driver

15. Batjargal

accountant

16. Tsetsgee

tax inspector

17. Dulmaa

population inspector

18. Khandsuren

herder

19. Batbaatar. C

herder

20. Danzansambuu

herder


APPENDIX 3

Workshop exercise: Mapping Poverty in Ulziit bag

APPENDIX 4

Household income generating activities identified by poor household in bag# 5 of Chuluut sum

Criteria

Activities

Rope making

Broom making

Dairy products selling

Cashmere selling

Sewing

Making Mongolian boots

Berries

Selling skin

Low price of raw material

10

9

10

14

8

4

8

10

Easier to make

1

5

1

4

1

1

5

6

More benefit

3

3

1

4

5

5

1

5

Have good market

8

4

2

9

4

7

3

6

Less labour

3

8

2

3

8

2

2

8

Total

25

29

16

34

26

19

19

35


Note: This matrix, drawn by a poor but skilled and active family, clearly shows the importance of supplementary skills to the income of poor herders. Rope, broom and boot-making, sewing and berry picking, can all be undertaken by rural families without substantial technical or material inputs. In contrast, a second level of income-generating activity covering carpentry, blacksmithing and hunting require higher inputs and are therefore practised by better-off households.

APPENDIX 5

SWOT Analysis Exercise

Group 1. Group Formation

Strength

Weakness

1. resource, capacity

1. takes time

2. good skills of working

2. different ideas of people

3. innovation

3. lack participatory activities

4. knowledge, experience


Opportunity

Threat

1. natural resource

1. lack finance

2. free time

2. lack materials

3. get credit

3. lack technology and techniques


Group 2. Diary products processing.

Strength

Weakness

1. enough raw materials

1. lack transport

2. local knowledge

2. seasonal dependence

3. labour force

3. lack participation

Opportunity

Threat

1. credit

1. lack finance

2. equipment, job place

2. lack electricity

3. labour force



Group 3. Potato Growing

Strength

Weakness

1. enough plots

1. continental strong climate

2. enough resources of labour force

2. weak capacity of finance

3. enough fertiliser

3. short time for growing

4. availability of professionals


Opportunity

Threat

1. good access to seeds

1. sudden climate changes

2. capacity for storage

2. danger of being eaten by animals

3. capacity to sell


4. capacity to transport


5. capacity to get credit




Previous Page Top of Page