Previous PageTable Of ContentsNext Page

ANNEX I - FINANCIAL EVALUATION AND SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF ORGANIC FARMING, INCLUDING SUBSIDIES

As indicated earlier in the report, Annex I shows the results produced when the financial evaluation and sensitivity analysis are based on the assumption that public subsidies are available for farmers who earn their profits through an organic farming system.

The only new factor introduced into our analysis by this consideration is the incorporation of certain extraordinary receipts during the years in which the subsidy is granted to farmers. In accordance with the Order of the Department of Agriculture (Order of 22 April 1998), on the application of the said subsidies, the following Table shows the extraordinary receipts that it would generate.

Table A
Extraordinary receipts generated by subsidies

Year of receipt Subsidies
(Pta./Ha)
Year 10 60 000
Year 11 48 000
Year 12 36 000
Year 13 36 000
Year 14 36 000

Source: Order of 22 April 1998, of the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food.

Following the procedure described in the fourth part of the present report, although working solely under Hypothesis B of conventional saturated markets, the data in Table A are combined with those in the aforementioned fourth part of the report. The results obtained are shown below.

Table B
Results for growing oranges and mandarins with subsidy (Hypothesis B)

  Organic orange Organic mandarin
IRR 10.43% IRR 16.11%
Discount rate NCV Recovery Period NCV Recovery Period
3% 1 870 174 14 6 254 346 8
4% 1 433 567 14 5 240 104 8
5% 1 064 567 15 4 378 598 8
6% 751 382 16 3 643 474 9
7% 484 480 17 3 013 393 9
8% 256 127 19 2 470 995 9

Source: Authors

 

Table C
Sensitivity analysis for organic oranges and mandarins, with subsidy

  % variation IRR   % variation IRR
% change receipts Organic orange % change payments Organic mandarin
-20 -94.00 -20 43.28
-15 -55.59 -15 32.38
-10 -32.46 -10 21.56
-5 -14.91 -5 10.80
0 0.00 0 0.00
5 13.48 5 -11.10
10 26.03 10 -23.08
15 37.89 15 -37.05
20 49.18 20 -54.88
Average
elasticity
16.02 Average
elasticity
-2.70

Source: Authors.

 


Previous PageTop Of PageNext Page