Previous PageTable Of ContentsNext Page

Galle and Matara are adjoining districts and were administered as one forest division at the time of the assessment. The average tree density in the dry zone is around 125 trees per hectare. More than 260 trees per hectare are found in the wet zone. Tree density in Kandy is unusually low despite the fact that the well-known Kandyan Forest Gardens are found in this area. Polonnaruwa is the other district with very low density. These differences cannot be explained with the available data.

Most home garden tree species are well distributed over the country and are found in all three climatic zones (Table 13). Geographical distribution and the tree density of the most common home garden species are shown in Appendix 2.

Table 13. Distribution of species within the study area

Species name

Category

  

No. of DS divisions where species are present

Distribution as a % of total area 

Local

Botanical

 

 

 

 

 

Mango

Mangifera indica

TF

241

92.3

Jak

Artocarpus heterophyllus

TF

240

92.0

Coconut

Cocos nucifera

TF

232

88.9

Orange

Citrus cinensis

F

227

87.0

Guava

Psidium guajva

F

220

84.3

Teak

Tectona grandis

T

217

83.1

Lime

Citrus aurantifolia

F

214

82.0

Margosa

Azadirachta indica

T

213

81.6

Cashew

Anacardium occidentale

TF

211

80.8

Tamarind

Tamarindus indica

TF

211

80.8

Arecanut

Areca catechu

F

188

72.0

Del

Artocarpus altilis

TF

171

65.5

Butter fruit

Persea americana

F

170

65.1

Lunumidella

Melia dubia

T

168

64.4

Mahogany

Swietenia macrophylla

T

165

63.2

Anoda

Anona cherimolia

F

164

62.8

Jambu

Syzygium malaccensis

F

163

62.5

Alstonia

Alstonia macrophylla

T

159

60.9

Milla

Vitex altissima

T

156

59.8

Kitul

Caryota urens

TF

155

59.4

Veralu

Elaeocarpus serratus

F

148

56.7

Rambutan

Nephelium lappaceum

TF

142

54.4

Ambarella

Spondias dulcis

F

130

49.8

Suriyamara

Albizia odoratissima

T

120

46.0

Eucalyptus

Eucalyptus spp.

T

114

43.7

Domba

Calophyllum inophyllum

T

111

42.5

Bamboo

Bambusa vulgaris

T

104

39.8

Kottamba

Terminalia catappa

T

104

39.8

Halmilla

Berrya cordifolia

T

101

38.7

Albizzia_1

Albizia molucana

T

98

37.5

Satin

Chloroxylon swietenia

T

98

37.5

Nedun

Pericopsis mooniana

T

95

36.4

Kumbuk

Terminalia arjuna

T

93

35.6

Pihimbiya

Filicium decipiens

T

88

33.7

Beli

Aegle marmelos

F

87

33.3

Wood apple

Limonia acidissima

TF

85

32.6

Kon

Schleichera oleosa

T

83

31.8

Mee

Madhuca longifolia

T

81

31.0

Rubber

Hevea brasiliensis

T

81

31.0

Hora

Dipterocarpus zeylanicus

T

79

30.3

Palu

Manilkara hexandra

T

77

29.5

Delum

Punica granatum

F

76

29.1

Murunga

Moringa oleifera

F

76

29.1

Palmairah

Borrasus flabellifer

TF

69

26.4

Ketakela

Bridelia retusa

T

68

26.1

Helamba

Mitragyma parvifolia

T

63

24.1

Kolon

Adina cordifolia

T

60

23.0

Gansuriya

Thespesia populnea

T

59

22.6

Ebony

Diospyros ebenum

T

58

22.2

Godapara

Dillenia retusa

T

58

22.2

Ipil Ipil

Leucaena leucocephala

T

54

20.7

Damba

Syzygium assimile

T

51

19.5

Kahata

Careya arborea

T

51

19.5

Ehela

Cassia fistula

T

50

19.2

Weera

Drypetes sepiaria

T

49

18.8

Daminiya

Grewia damine

T

47

18.0

Nelli

Phyllanthus emblica

F

45

17.2

Bulu

Terminalia bellirica

T

41

15.7

Hik

Lannea coromandelica

T

38

14.6

Hulanhik

Chukrasia tabularis

T

38

14.6

Sabukku

Grevillea robusta

T

36

13.8

Wewarana

Alseodaphne semicarpifolia

T

36

13.8

Kaduru

Thevetia peruviana

T

34

13.0

Toona

Toona sinensis

T

34

13.0

Welang

Pterospermum suberifolium

T

32

12.3

Mora

Dimocarpus longana

TF

23

8.8

Gammalu

Pterocarpus marsupium

T

18

6.9

Kenda

Macaranga peltata

T

18

6.9

Etamba

Mangifera zeylanica

TF

16

6.1

Gal siyambala

Dialium ovoideum

TF

13

5.0

Albizzia_2

Albizia lebbeck

T

12

4.6

Cocoa

Theobroma cacao

F

12

4.6

Gliricidia

Gliricidia sepium L.

T

12

4.6

Aralu

Terminalia chebula

TF

10

3.8

Gini sapu

Michelia champaca

T

9

3.4

Coffee

Coffea arabica

F

8

3.1

The 11 most valuable timber species can be found in more than 60 percent of the study area. Wood is used for all kinds of construction purposes, furniture and handicrafts. Table 14 shows the market prices of logs and timber classes of the most valuable home garden tree species. These are the prevailing log prices and timber classes of the State Timber Corporation (STC) and tend to change with market demand. Open market prices are somewhat higher than the STC prices.

Table 14. Most valuable timber species found in home gardens

Species name

Origin

Timber class

Log price/m3

(Rs.)

Local

Botanical

Teak

Tectona grandis

Planted

Super luxury

23 040< /span>

Nedun

Pericopsis mooniana

Naturally grown/planted

Super luxury

23 040

Jak

Artocarpus heterophyllus

Planted

Luxury

15 120

Mahogany

Swietenia macrophylla

Planted

Luxury

14 760

Satin

Chloroxylon swietenia

Naturally grown

Luxury

15 180

Halmilla

Berrya cordifolia

Naturally grown/planted

Luxury

15 180

Milla

Vitex altissima

Naturally grown

Luxury

15 180

Eucalyptus

Eucalyptus spp.

Planted

Special & 2

5 700

Margosa

Azadirachta indica

Naturally grown/planted

Special

14 220

Kumbuk

Terminalia arjuna

Naturally grown/planted

Special

11 340

Palu

Manilkara hexandra

Naturally grown

Special

14 220

Welang

Pterospermum suberifolium

Naturally grown

Special

14 220

Kolon

Adina cordifolia

Naturally grown

Special

14 220

Suriyamara

Albizia odoratissima

Naturally grown

Special

14 220

Hora

Dipterocarpus zeylanicus

Naturally grown/planted

1

7 740

Ketakela

Bridelia retusa

Naturally grown

1

7 740

Kon

Schleichera oleosa

Naturally grown

1

7 740

Damba

Syzygium assimile

Naturally grown

1

7 740

Helamba

Mitragyma parvifolia

Naturally grown

1

7 740

Alstonia

Alstonia macrophylla

Planted

2

5 700

Toona

Toona sinensis

Naturally grown/planted

2

5 700

Coconut

Cocos nucifera

Planted

3

3 216

Rubber

Hevea brasiliensis

Planted

3

3 216

Mango

Mangifera indica

Planted

3

1 620

Albizzia_1

Albizia molucana

Planted

3

1 620

Lunumidella

Melia dubia

Naturally grown/planted

3

3 180

Sabukku

Grevillea robusta

Naturally grown/planted

3

3 180

Rambutan

Nephelium lappaceum

Planted

3

1 620

Daminiya

Grewia damine

Naturally grown

3

1 620

Tamarind

Tamarindus indica

Naturally grown/planted

3

1 620

 

Timber production potential

The contribution of home gardens to timber production is well known. The findings of this study can be used to obtain a tentative estimate of the timber production potential of home gardens in different climatic zones. Of the 76 species considered in this analysis, 61 species are capable of producing industrial timber. Species with above one million individuals and capable of producing industrial timber are shown in Table 15. There are 17 such species, which represent 83 percent of the total number of trees recorded during the survey.

The earlier FSMP studies indicated that one hectare of home gardens would produce 0.95 m3 of sawlogs and 0.5 m3 of poles per year. According to this estimate poles account for 34 percent of the total volume production. Multi-purpose tree species (e.g. jak, coconut, rubber and mango) are rarely used for poles and small-diameter timber. The bulk of poles and small-diameter timber is produced from other species, especially exotics (e.g. alstonia, eucalyptus, mahogany). The potential timber production has been calculated for each species taking into account the above facts (Table 15). In addition, it is assumed that only 40 to 70 percent of the total number of trees, depending on the species, reaches maturity to produce sawlogs. Average values have been used for the rotation age and timber volume of individual trees (volume over bark).

Table 15. Estimated sawlog production

Species name

Category

Total no. of trees

Estimated no. of trees that would reach maturity

Rotation age (years)

Timber

volume per tree (m3)

Estimated timber volume (m3)

Local

Botanical

Coconut

Cocos nucifera

Timber & food

38 616 649

27 031 654

50

0.15

81 095

Rubber

Hevea brasiliensis

Timber

17 101 488

10 260 893

30

0.3

102 609

Jak

Artocarpus heterophyllus

Timber & food

10 437 142

8 349 714

40

0.5

104 371

Mahogany

Swietenia macrophylla

Timber

6 410 248

2 564 099

30

0.6

51 282

Alstonia

Alstonia macrophylla

Timber

5 968 286

2 387 314

25

0.3

28 648

Mango

Mangifera indica

Timber & food

5 607 688

3 925 382

40

0.4

39 254

Albizzia_1

Albizia molucana

Timber

5 607 581

2 243 032

25

0.4

35 889

Eucalyptus

Eucalyptus spp.

Timber

4 061 191

1 624 476

25

0.6

38 987

Teak

Tectona grandis

Timber

3 293 609

1 317 444

35

0.6

22 585

Margosa

Azadirachta indica

Timber

3 044 932

2 131 452

45

0.4

18 946

Lunumidella

Melia dubia

Timber

2 349 245

1 409 547

25

0.4

22 553

Kitul

Caryota urens

Timber & food

1 751 016

1 225 711

35

0.15

5 253

Satin

Chloroxylon swietenia

Timber

1 489 903

1 042 932

70

0.4

5 960

Sabukku

Grevillea robusta

Timber

1 460 721

584 288

30

0.35

6 817

Halmilla

Berrya cordifolia

Timber

1 185 466

829 826

40

0.4

8 298

Rambutan

Nephelium lappaceum

Timber & food

1 177 920

824 544

40

0.4

8 245

Toona

Toona sinensis

Timber

1 023 771

511 886

25

0.4

8 190

Daminiya

Grewia damine

Timber

1 001 625

600 975

40

0.4

6 010

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

594 992

Five exotic timber species (mahogany, alstonia, albizzia, eucalyptus and teak), which are later additions to the species mix of home gardens, account for 30 percent of the total timber volume produced in home gardens. Rubber alone would produce about 17 percent of the timber volume while three main multi-purpose tree species traditionally grown in home gardens (coconut, jak, and mango) would produce 38 percent of the timber volume.

The FSMP estimated the production potential of home gardens as 0.583 million m3 of sawlogs in 2000 (Table 4). The estimated volume using the data in this survey is 0.594 million m3. This is about 25 percent higher than the FSMP estimates considering that the study has covered only 87 percent of the country and the volume has been calculated only for 83 percent of the species found in home gardens.

Previous PageTop Of PageNext Page