Previous Page Table of Contents Next Page


Section 2: Access to food and rural livelihoods


Food security and nutrition

Food security means that all people, at all times, have physical and economic access to adequate food that is safe and in keeping with social and cultural preferences, to be able to lead an active an d healthy life. FAO identifies four conditions of food security - adequate food supply; stability of food supply without seasonal or yearly fluctuations; physical and economic access to food; food quality and safety.

While there is no single formula to ensure food security, production and distribution of food are key elements. Agriculture is the main source of employment and income in Asia and the Pacific and any hunger reduction strategy for the region must focus on bringing about increases in the productivity and incomes of the small and marginal rural producers.

FAO is also concerned about the impact of liberalization and globalization of trade in agricultural products on food security both at national level and for poor and disadvantaged groups at the household level. The FAO regional office assists countries in incorporating a food security component into national development plans and providing food at minimum cost to vulnerable groups.

The regional office is working to improve the efficiency of key national food agencies and their distribution systems as well as national early - warning systems. It extends technical network activities on food security training and builds national capacities to identify pricing and technical deficiencies.

As a follow - up to the 1996 WFS, FAO conducts annual assessments of the food security situation at the regional, sub - regional and national level. The findings are published in the State of food insecurity in the world reports, which measure year - by - year progress in hunger reduction by the countries of the world and provide a useful policy and planning guidance tool to governments.

Under another post - WFS initiative, FAO is assisting countries in the region, as part of a global initiative, to set up national hunger identification systems. The Food Insecurity and Vulnerability Information and Mapping System (FIVIMS) will provide reliable, accurate and consistent information on the extent, nature and causes of food insecurity and vulnerability at sub - national, national, regional and global levels.

Food quality and safety control is equally important for food security. The growing pressure of demand on food production, handling and distribution systems could lead to potentially serious food quality and safety problems. Developing countries in the region must be able to meet internationally accepted food quality and safety standards in order to gain from the liberalization of agricultural trade through strengthening national food safety systems; harmonizing food safety regulations; and participating effectively in the work of the Codex Alimentarius Commission, set up by FAO and the World Health Organization (WHO).

Reliable agricultural statistics are vital for national planning and policy making on agriculture and food security. The regional office monitors developments in the fields of food and agricultural statistics. It assists in conducting agricultural censuses and surveys (e.g. use of appropriate methodologies, training of national personnel and the analysis and dissemination of food and agricultural statistics), and works with other international and technical assistance agencies to facilitate cross - sectoral analyses.

FAO is developing a regional information database in the framework of the World Agricultural Information Centre (WAICENT), which is one of the world's most comprehensive sources of agricultural information. WAICENT offers FAO’s accumulated knowledge and expertise, enabling decision makers and professionals to obtain and use information essential for achieving sustainable agricultural development and helping to combat hunger.

The past two FAO regional conferences for Asia and the Pacific highlighted the devastation in food and agriculture caused by disasters. The conferences reiterated the WFS commitment to prevent, mitigate and improve the management of disasters in food and agriculture and recommended FAO technical assistance in the tasks. An Asia-Pacific conference on early warning, prevention, preparedness and management of disasters in food and agriculture was held in Chiang Mai in June 2001 directed at laying the foundations of country disaster management programmes targeted at the farmer. It stressed the best farming systems and practices to be recommended to farmers in disaster - prone areas and the essential supporting services which governments must provide. All 38 Asia-Pacific FAO member countries were invited to attend as well as 12 concerned international organizations. The outcome of the conference is reported in publication RAP 2001/14.

Six Asia-Pacific countries were represented at a regional expert consultation, which was organized by the FAO regional office and India’s Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture (CRIDA) in Hydrabad, India in January 2002. The 21 participants shared experiences, information and concerns on a range of issues dealing with livelihood and food security in the drought - prone areas of the region.

Senior policy makers, chief executives and marketing managers of national food agencies and related public sector organizations in China, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Myanmar, Nepal, Pakistan, Philippines, Republic of Korea and Thailand met to discuss the impact of agricultural trade liberalization on domestic food markets and food security in Cha - am, Thailand in December 2001. The meeting, organized by the Association of Food and Agricultural Marketing Agencies in Asia and the Pacific (AFMA) with support from the FAO regional office in Bangkok, provided an opportunity for sharing country experiences on best practices in grain market support programmes and procurement. A discussion of country cases provided up - to - date information on the status, constraints and issues linked to grain market stabilization, price support and consumer subsidies.

FAO supports the Asia-Pacific network for food and nutrition. As a first step toward introducing FIVIMS at the national level, the regional office urged member countries to identify a national focal point to sensitize concerned institutions. This was followed by sensitization workshops involving all stakeholders. As a follow up of such workshops, Bangladesh, Cambodia, China, India, Philippines, Sri Lanka and Thailand expressed interest in preparing project proposals seeking FAO technical assistance.

Nutrition experts from Bangladesh, China, Fiji, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Nepal, Philippines, Sri Lanka, Thailand, Vanuatu and Viet Nam met at the FAO regional office in November 2001 to review national initiatives in educating people in healthy food practices. Publication RAP 2001/27 contains the report of the meeting.

The regional office supports the Asia and Pacific Commission on Agricultural Statistics (APCAS) - see publication RAP 2001/02 Report of the 18th session of APCAS - and publishes annually the Selected indicators of food and agricultural development in the Asia-Pacific region.

Publication RAP 2001/23 is an account of the proceedings of the September 2001 consultation held at the FAO regional office in Bangkok, which was attended by representatives from China, India, Indonesia, Japan, Pakistan, Philippines and Thailand. Following up on the recommendation of the November 2000 session of APCAS, the meeting was convened to assist countries in the region improve their compilation and dissemination of agribusiness statistics.

In cooperation with a Japanese funded regional project, a workshop was conducted on Moving towards an agricultural statistics system for the market economy in Bangkok in January 2001 attended by senior and middle - level officials from Cambodia, China, Laos, Mongolia, Myanmar and Viet Nam.

Sustainable rural development

Strong, representative grassroots institutions are essential for improving rural living conditions. Participation in organizations and institutions at local level significantly improves access to productive resources and enables poor rural households to use these to better their lot. Such institutions include elected bodies, farmers or other rural producers’ associations or cooperatives, civil society, and informal networks reflecting common practices, cultural norms or beliefs.

However, local organizations and institutions in many countries are unable to perform well either in their roles of facilitation, information and advocacy, or in negotiations with external organizations and institutions. Decentralization of and people’s participation in local planning needs to be strengthened as well as access to information and extension, credit and marketing services. Information and expertise in best practices on rural development needs to be encouraged, and socio - economic indicators to measure progress in equity need to be refined.

Women make up more than 40 percent of the rural workforce in the Asia-Pacific region and are the main performers of vital agricultural tasks - from conservation of plant seed, sowing and weeding crops, to processing the harvest. Yet, their contribution is often underestimated and overlooked in development plans and strategies, due in part to the lack of gender disaggregated data.

It is more difficult for women to get access to land, credit and other agricultural inputs such as technology, extension, training and services. Inheritance and land tenure laws limit women’s ownership and use of land. In the poorest and most populous countries of the region, the majority of girls are still denied access to basic education, further restricting their ability to take advantage of the limited opportunities they have to improve their circumstances.

The FAO Gender and Development Plan of Action (2002 - 2007) provides an organizational framework to mainstream gender in FAO activities. Priority areas identified for gender mainstreaming are food and nutrition, natural resource management, agriculture support systems and agriculture and rural development policy and planning.

Due to enormous variations in agro - ecological and socio - economic contexts, Asia-Pacific countries need to tailor agricultural extension programmes and methodological links to the needs of the farmers. Alternative policies, strategies, approaches and systems need to address extension management and extension - research - education linkages. Also, gender considerations need to be introduced in national agricultural education, research, extension and development programmes.

Continuous planning, monitoring and evaluation of extension programmes is needed, as well as the introduction of participatory and cost - effective extension methodologies and gender - sensitive programmes based on participatory rural appraisal.

FAO supports the Network for the Development of Agricultural Cooperatives (NEDAC) and the UN System Network on Rural Development and Food Security.

Representatives from 13 NEDAC organizations (from Bangladesh, China, India, Japan, Malaysia, Mongolia, Nepal, Philippines, Republic of Korea, Sri Lanka and Thailand) were joined by prominent Asian resource persons and FAO experts in Bangkok in early 2001 to discuss the impact of globalization and liberalization on agriculture and rural development. The round table meeting drew up guidelines for the preparation of strategic action plans for cooperative development in the context of the changed political and socio - economic situation in Asia.

Farm cooperative leaders, experts and government policy makers met in China in September 2001 for a round table on preparing agricultural cooperatives for changing market and human resources needs in the region.

A regional consultation of NGOs and civil society organizations (CSOs) was organized in Bangkok in August 2001 to prepare a civil society perspective on food security for the World Food Summit: five years later held in June 2002.

RAP publication 2001/05 presents issues on gender sensitive local planning and contains country experiences in including women’s concerns in the local planning process in Bangladesh, Cambodia, China, India, Nepal, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Thailand and Viet Nam.

There is growing empirical evidence of the key role of rural women in agrobiodiversity conservation for food security in developing countries. An expert consultation on this subject was held at the University of the Philippines Los Banos in September 2001. Co - organized with the International Potato Centre - Users’ Perspectives With Agricultural Research and Development (CIP - UPWARD) and the Southeast Asian Ministers of Education Organization - Regional Center for Graduate Study and Research in Agriculture (SEAMEO - SEARCA), the meeting reviewed experiences from Bangladesh, Bhutan, China, India, Indonesia, Laos, Nepal, Philippines and Thailand. Publication RAP 2002/07 calls for increased visibility and understanding among development workers and policy makers of rural women’s distinct knowledge, skills and barriers related to the management of local agro - biodiversity for food security.

FAO and the China Agricultural Broadcasting and Television School organized an expert consultation on strategies for using distant learning for the advancement of rural women. Held in October 2001 in Beijing, the meeting was attended by participants from Bangladesh, Bhutan, China, India, Mongolia, Pakistan, Philippines, Sri Lanka and Thailand.

Published in the UN’s International Year of Mountains, for which FAO is the lead UN agency, publication RAP 2002/05 Case study on educational opportunities for hill tribes in northern Thailand notes the need for improved participation of and communication with the indigenous people in planning and implementing support activities; local curriculum development and local capacity building; and closer coordination among the multiple government support programmes for the hill tribes, as well as collaboration among government agencies and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs).

Science and technology have played a vital role in keeping agricultural production a step ahead of rapid global population growth in the past four decades. However, the green revolution technologies did not benefit the vast rainfed and other marginal areas with high concentrations of hunger and poverty. The new farming technologies were also not friendly to the environment, often resulting in degradation of land, water and biodiversity. These are some of the pitfalls to be avoided in the future development of agricultural science and technology, publication RAP 2002/02 cautions, while outlining the desirable features of a new technological revolution that is needed to tackle the persisting hunger and poverty in Asia and the Pacific in the new millennium.

Senior professionals from 14 Asian countries, leading international research institutions, agencies and regional non - governmental organizations (NGOs) met at the FAO regional office in July 2002 to review the changing role and demands of agricultural extension in the region. Experts and officials from Bangladesh, Cambodia, China, India, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Nepal, Pakistan, Philippines, Republic of Korea, Sri Lanka, Thailand and Viet Nam produced a plan of action that included modalities, strategies and lessons suitable for application to regional/national conditions.


Previous Page Top of Page Next Page