Previous Page Table of Contents


Table 1. Annual nation-wide statistics depicting the incidence of registered occurrences of marine pollution between 1969 through 1974. “I” denotes pollution cases related to petroleum product (oil); “II” indicates other types of pollution unrelated to oil; “T” denotes sum total of I and II. Figures in parentheses show the number of red tide outbreaks. Data for the southwest sea areas is that compiled after reversion of Okinawa to Japan in 1972 (May 15th).

Year196919701971197219731974
DescriptionIIITIIITIIITIIITIIITIIIT
Region                  
Hokkaido, coast12 1224630487557912
(2)
91
(2)
915
(2)
96
(2)
1348
(2)
142
(2)
Honshu, eastern coast11102119423822010214917
(8)
166
(8)
22120
(8)
241
(8)
20816
(2)
224
(2)
Tokyo Bay51 5149756258125932411
(3)
335
(3)
240524524612
(3)
258
(3)
Ise Bay2512619 1928158
(55)
339
(55)
23549
(47)
284
(47)
17559
(56)
234
(56)
19143
(36)
234
(36)
Osaka Bay38 384124314614
(4)
160
(4)
39439
(28)
433
(28)
31070
(67)
380
(67)
26953
(44)
322
(44)
Seto Inland Sea (excluding Osaka Bay)6316411461175253149
(104)
402
(104)
480136
(112)
616
(112)
538129
(94)
667
(94)
531141
(69)
672
(69)
Honshu, southern coast24 24354399915
(9)
114
(9)
10410
(4)
114
(4)
11925
(13)
144
(13)
7213
(8)
85
(8)
Kyushu, coast3223432335773801144
(1)
118
(1)
11542
(5)
157
(5)
10441
(6)
145
(6)
Japan Sea, coast17213816420565411048176587221099333
(2)
126
(2)
Sea areas, southwest         5656116423
(1)
187
(1)
13721
(3)
158
(3)
TOTALS27335308349914401300321
(172)
1621
(172)
1983300
(205)
2283
(205)
2060400
(246)
2460
(246)
1985381
(175)
2366
(175)

Table 2. Frequency of samples exceeding the environmental quality standards for total mercury according to geographical region in Japan.

Metropolis, districts, and prefecturesName of water bodySample numberNumber of samples
[exceeding]
the environmental
[lower than]
quality standard
Hokkaido Pref.Muka River   7   4  3
Akita Pref.Yoneshiro River  11   9  2
Gumma Pref.Vicinity of the Shibu River above the Tone River  15   8  7
Tokyo MetropolisEdo River   8   7  1
"
Ara River   2   0  2
"
Shin  10   010
"
Tama River   5   4  1
"
Port of Tokyo  34  32  2
Yokohama CityPort of Keihin Yokohama  13  10  3
"
    3   2  1
Kanagawa Pref.Morito River   3   2  1
Nagano Pref.Chikuma River  10   9  1
Gifu Pref.Suimon River  14  13  1
"
    4   3  1
Nagoya CityOe River   4   3  1
"
Port of Nagoya 35  34  1
Niigata Pref.  15  14  1
Mie Pref.Hanyu River   4   1  3
Osaka District    6   3  3
Kyoto CityTenjin River   1   0  1
"
Nishitakase River   1   0  1
Osaka DistrictSea areas of the Sennen headland  22  21  1
Hiroshima Pref.Sea areas of the Otake headland  10   9  1
"
Sea areas of the Onomichi headland    3   2  1
KagawaGobou River    5   4  1
SUB-TOTAL25 bodies of water26721156
Yamagata Pref.Port of Sakata  13  12  1
"
Sea area of the Sakata headland  19  18  1
Toyama Pref.Port of Toyama   3   2  1
"
A channel connecting to the Port of Toyama   7   3  4
Kyushu (5 prefectures)Ariake Sea128126  2
"
Omuta River   1  0  1
"
Yasuhiro Sea  82  78  4
"
Mina River    2   1  1
"
Euchi River    1   0  1
"
Port of Minamata    6   3  3
"
Amakusanada Shimofukaezu River    2   1  1

Table 3. Regions which Require(d) Sediment Removal Operation as a Countermeasure of Mercury Pollution.

PREFECTURENAME OF WATER BODYHG (PPM) IN SEDIMENTREMOVAL STD (PPM)ACTION TAKEN
minmaxav
Hokkaido 0.0338.745.83925Under critical survey
 Muka R.0.09249.8246.98025"
 Shimizu R. 384.2525"
 Toyomae R. 218.5325"
 Aino R.0.3352.7119.25625"
GummaVicinity of the Shibu R. above the Tone R.0.02164.0018.27925Project completed
ChibaPort of Chiba (off Ichihara)0.07181.6921.13110Removal operation in progress
"
Port of Chiba (off Kitasodeura)0.1323.702.73010Project completed
Tokyo MetropolisLower Sumida R. at Okubashi2.30180.0025.95025Under planning
Kawasaki CityKeihin channel, near Central Chemical Co.1.1017.508.242  7Project completed
"
Keihin channel, near Showa Denko Co.2.20207.7076.240  7"
NaganoSewage of Okaya City0.3895.0047.69025"
GifuWestern main drainage channel (including Ogaki channel)13.00180.0066.25025"
NagoyaOe R.59.00627.20301.51025Removal operation in progress
MieTanshyo R.3.5110.035.87525Project completed
OsakaTorikai iro1.3175.0024.65725Project completed
"
Kanou iro2.931560.00531.41825"
HyogoMain Port of Takasago0.1834.107.32425"
"
Mouth of the Shyoka R4.7047.0025.65825"
TokushimaVicinity of the town of Mizui on the Naka R.0.1934.009.92125Under critical survey
KagawaPort of Sakaide0.2161.0010.08040Under planning
Kitakyushu C.Dokkai Bay0.7634.407.85030Projected completed
OitaUpper Nizu R. at Unabarabashi0.2247.009.26725Under planning
YamagataPort of Sakata0.04171.009.0028Under preparation for removal operation
ToyamaPort of Toyama, a channel connecting with0.09100.0037.0030Project completed
"
Koyake R.0.03220.0021.6025"
YamaguchiPort of Tokuyama0.0731.594.6315Under preparation for removal operation

Table 4. Execution of self-imposed control upon the taking of fish polluted with PCBs.

Geographic regionEnforcement date of self-imposed controlObjective fish species
Tokyo Bay, northern partDec. 28, 1972Striped mullet Sea bass
Seki R. systemOct.   2, 1972All species
Naoetsu waterfrontDec. 25, 1972All species
Tsuruga BayJun.    2, 1973All species
Kobe City, water-front vicinityJun.    5, 1973“Konoshiro”, Konosirus punctatus
Mackerel
Himeji City, water-front vicinityJun.    5, 1973Sea bass “Konoshiro” Striped mullet
Takasago City, water-front vicinityJun.    5, 1973All species
Iwakuni City, water front vicinityJun.    4, 1973Striped mullet
Conger eel
Bitterling
“Konoshiro”
Aug. 27, 1973“Hiiragi”
“Shimaisaki”, Therapon oxyrhynchus
Magara R*Aug. 21, 1974“Nigoi” [carp] Catfish
Kyoto area (Uji R. system)Jun.  18, 1973Common minnow
Cruscian carp
Seta R.Jun.  14, 1973Common minnow
Lake BiwaJun.  14, 1973Common minnow
Catfish
Oi R.Feb. 20, 1973Eel
Lake Shinji*Jul.   11, 1972Corbicula
Tenryu R.*Jun.    3, 1974Dace
Sai R.*Jun.    3, 1974Dace

Data from the Fisheries Agency. Geographic regions marked with an asterisk denote those where self-imposed control has resulted from prefectural surveys.

Table 5. Results of a nation-wide survey on PCB pollution in water, 1972.

AREAPREFECTURENO. OF SAMPLESNO. WITH PCBsAV. (ppb)MAX-MIN
(1)RiversHokkaido    6  2   2.52 – 3
Tokyo  18  1    0.50.5
Yamanashi    6  2    0.70.6 – 0.8
     6  6    0.91.3.–16.3
Gifu    5  5    1.50.7 – 2
     4  2    0.70.6 – 0.8
     1  1 11
Shizuoka    1  1 22
Aichi    4  2    1.10.9 – 1.2
Osaka    2  1    0.50.5
     1  1    0.50.5
Hyogo    3  3 53 – 6
Tokushima  1411    2.01.3 – 4.2
Fukuoka    3  1 33
     3  1    0.70.7
     1  1    0.90.9
Oita    6  2    1.00.6 – 1.4
     6  2    2.82.4 – 3.2
TOTAL  9045  
(2)Sea AreasYamaguchi134  4    1.30.6 – 2.9
Tokushima  19  4    1.10.9 – 1.4
Kumamoto    1  1    0.60.6
     1  1    0.70.7
TOTAL15510  
(3)Drainage channelsIwate    1  11010
     1  1 22
Miyagi    1  12020
     1  13030
Fukushima    1  1 33
     2  1    0.90.9
Niigata    3  2   2.10.6 – 3.6
     2  236.519 –54
Fukui    2  111
Gifu    3  199
     9  4    2.10.7 – 6
     8  2 54 – 6
Shizuoka    2  1     0.50.5
     1  1  66
     1  11717
Aichi    1  1    0.60.6
     1  1    0.60.6
Kyoto    4  1 11
Tokushima    1  1 11
Kagawa    3  3283.6 –76
Kumamoto    2  2    0.80.5 – 1
     1  1    0.70.7
Miyazaki    2  2 61.9 –10
TOTAL5333  

Data from Environmental Agency

Table 6. Results of a Nation-wide Survey on the Quantities of PCBs in Sediments. (1972)

 PrefectureAreaNumber of samplesAverageRange (max-min)
[A]ShizuokaTagonoura  9  59.8  7.5 – 130
AichiGomeiyosui  5107.318.3 – 300
 Gamagori City26  26.8  0.1 – 170
 Azumao R.  3  65.9  0.7 – 150
 Sana R.  5  40.6  0.9 – 100
TokushimaYoshinaga  5  81.8   0.02– 386
[B]IwateIwai R.  3  54.654.6
NiigataOgisone R.  6  34.3  1.9 –    62
FukuiTsuruga Port  9  29.62   –    65
 Shono R.  6  17.7  0.4 –    55
GifuArata R.  53515    –    80
HyogoShoge R.18   21.2  0.7 –    55
NaraNoto R.  2   25.6  0.1 –    51
MiyazakiHitotsuse R.29    6.7  0.01–    56

Data from the Environment Agency. Bracketed “A” are those areas where PCB concentrations exceeding 100 ppm have been found; “B” denotes those areas where concentrations were 50 to 100 ppm.

Table 7. Regulations on the Use of Agricultural Chemicals (As of Jan 15, 1975)

REGULATION ON USEAGRICULTURAL CHEMICALSENFORCEMENT DATE
Designated as potentially “residual” due to adsorption or absorption in agricultural products
Lead arsenate
May 1, 1971
Endrin
"
Deisgnated as potentially “residual” in soil
Dieldrin
"
Aldrin
"
Designated as potentially “residual” in water
Telodrin
"
Endrin
"
Benzoepin
"
PCP herbicide
"
Rotenone
"
Prohibited
Organic mercury (excluding those for seed sterilization
Mar     1970
DDT
May 1, 1971
TEPP
Jun 1, 1971
Methyl parathion
"
Parathion
"
BHC
Dec30, 1971
Heptachlor
Aug 9, 1972
2,4,5-T
Apr 6, 1971
Organic mercury for seed sterilization
Oct29, 1973

Data from the Environment Agency

Table 8. Changes in yields of some major fisheries (1960, 1965, 1970, 1973).

 YIELD (1000 tons)
 1960196519701973%
Ocean Fisheries     
Open ocean fishery
1,4561,7333,4293,96337.0
Off-shore fishery
2,1112,7873,2753,94436.0
Coastal fishery
2,2501,8611,8911,81517.9
Aquaculture (marine)1380549790 7.4
Inland water fishery2113119114 1.1
Inland water aquaculture334864 0.6
TOTAL6,1296,9089,31810,690100.0
Whaling (heads) 20,39516,25111,268 

Data from the “Production of Fisheries and Aquaculture Yearbook,” 1974.
Superscript “1” denotes mariculture of oyster, laver (Porphyra), pearls, and yellowtail;
“2” denotes rivers and lakes.

Table 9. Damages to Cultured Laver (“nori”) Caused by Oil Pollution in Tokyo Bay (1967–1972).

DATELOCATIONSOURCEDAMAGES IN 1000 YEN
1967Nov13–27Off Funabashi CityWaste oil from factories 448,200
Dec7–9Off Kisarazu City
"
313,862
1968Jan8
"
"
104,395
Jan30–31Off Funabashi CitySpillage of fuel oil523,668
Nov29Off Kisarazu CityWaste oil  25,434
Dec4
"
"
    6,360
Dec6–8Coast from Sodegaura to Kisarazu CitySpillage of oil by tanker collision393,021
1969Feb12
"
Waste oil  73,100
Mar6Kisarazu CityFoul-smelling sludge from fuel refinery  31,000
Mar7Futsu CitySpillage of fuel oil from an iron factory  49,419
1970Apr10SodegauraAlkyl benzene  43,725
1971Dec4Kisarazu CityFuel oil791,960
Dec21Tateyama CityFuel oil  13,000
1972Jan16Futsu CityFuel oil    8,500

Data from the Environmental Agency.

Table 10. Pollution Trends in the Seto Inland Sea During the Past Several Decades

 UNITS19521972
Transparency(m)8.786.33
NH3-N(μg-at/1)2.393.62
NO2-N"0.300.84
NO3-N"1.032.83
PO3-P"0.460.54

Data from Governors' Conference on Environmental Protection. Values represent means of all measurements taken during water quality survey in the Seto Inland Sea.

Table 11. Water Quality of the Major Industrial Areas in the Region of the Seto Inland Sea.1)

 COD (ppm)2)
VICINITYOsakaKobeMizushimaTokuyama
SAMPLING STN.Port of OsakaKobe-OhashiPort of MizushimaSennoshima
19704.81.33)2.75.14)
19733.40.81.52.6
19742.31.61.32.3

1) Data from the Environment Agency

2) Average yearly value

3) Value in 1971

4) Value in 1967

Table 12. Surveillance Results of Environmental Quality Guidelines in the Seto Inland Sea and Nation-wide.

[a] Incidences at which guidelines were exceeded for health categories.

REGIONYEARNO. OF SAMPLES EXAMINED (E)NO. WHICH EXCEEDED GUIDELINE LEVEL (F)RATIO F/E (%)
Seto Inland Sea1971  28,393  630.22
1972  44,432  920.21
1973  49,6601120.22
Nation-wide1971  89,0745040.57
1972167,3684760.28
1973181,0724110.23

[b] Percentage of those areas which conformed to the environmental quality guidelines.

 Seto Inland SeaNation-wide
AREA1971197219731973
River45464753
Lake  0  03330
Sea60807984

Data from the Environmental Agency

Table 13. Percentages of COD Area Distribution in the Seto Inland Sea (1972 to 1974).

RANGE OF COD LEVEL
[PPM]
197219731974
<127.727.323.9
1.1 – 2.043.739.945.3
2.1 – 3.015.622.716.7
>3.113.010.114.1

Data from Environmental Agency. Values were taken in May of each year.

Table 14. Red tide plankters which appeared in the Seto Inland Sea during outbreaks in 1974.

NoctilucaHaplodinium
SkeletonemaThalassiosira
GymnodiniumGyrodinium
OlithodiscusCosinodiscus
ProrocentrumPeridinium
MesodiniumNitzschia
CeratiumFibrocapsa
HeterosigmaTricodesnium
EutreptillaRhodomonas
LeptcylindrasAsteromonas
CheatocerasPyramimonas
GonyaulaxPolyblepharides

Table 15. Localities of the Seto Inland Sea where concentrations of PCBs detected in fish exceeded the allowable limit of 3 ppm.

LOCATION OF CATCHSPECIES OF FISHLEVEL OF PCBs (ppm)
Osaka Bay, Southern CoastMackerel  5
"      ,off Kobe
Conger eel  8
 Kelp greenling  4
Harima Nada, off TakasagoGray mullet  6
 Konoshiro  6
Hiroshima Bay, off Iwakuni cityCommon sea bass  3
 Yellowtail  4
Beppu Bay, estuary of the Oita RiverEel43
 Young bass  3

Data from an investigation of the actual state of PCB pollution, conducted by the Environmental Agency and Fisheries Agency in 1972.

Table 16. Pollution Sources of Mercury and its Environmental Levels in the Seto Island Sea

Pollution Source and EnvironmentOff TokuyamaOff NiihamaOff Mizushima
Source of Mercury PollutionTokuyama Soda Co.Sumitomo Chemical Co.Kato Denka Co.
 Toyo Soda Co. Ryonichi Co.
   Okayama Kasei Co.
 Engaged in production of caustic soda by a mercury electrolysis process.
Total Amount of Mercury Utilized (tons)1,261,80032,900612,800
Amount of Mercury Consumption (tons)380.8191.230.1
Amount of Mercury6.640.70.76
Discharged into the Sea (tons)   
Fish & ShellfishIIII
WaterIII
SedimentIIII

I - Mercury concentration lower than guideline level (0.5 ppm)
II - Mercury concentration exceeding guideline level

[Data from Environmental Agency]

Table 17. Average Values of Heavy Metals in Oysters From Hiroshima Prefecture (from 1968 to 1972).

HEAVY METALCONCENTRATION (ppm)
Arsenic0.45–1.84
Copper15.4–28.3
Lead0.1–0.4
Zinc213–641
Cadmium0.3–1.7
Chromium0.02–0.05
Mercury (total)<0.02

Table 18. Area of Reclaimed Land in the Seto Inland Sea According to Prefecture (1955–1969).

PREFECTUREAREA (hectares)
Wakayama
567.0
Osaka
2,631.6
Hyogo
2,725.6
Okayama
4,504.0
Hiroshima
1,890.2
Yamaguchi
973.3
Tokushima
118.0
Kagawa
1,667.9
Ehime
518.3
Fukuoka
726.0
Oita
1,316.9
Total
17,575.0

Table 19. Area of Reclaimed Land in the Seto Inland Sea According to Zone. Projected area of reclamation as of Dec 1, 1971.

ZONEAREA (hectares)
Kii Channel
14
Osaka Bay
4,003
Harima Nada
2,904
Bisan Seto
4,133
Hiuchi Nada
1,943
Aki Nada
795
Iyo Nada
1,209
Suho Nada
54,400
Total
69,401

Table 20. Coastline Utilization of the Seto Inland Sea (1974)

PREFECTUREC O A S T A L   S H O R E   L I N ESUB-TOTALTOTAL
NATURALSEMI-NATURALARTIFICIAL
MainIsl.MainIsl.MainIsl.MainIsl.
Wakayama
44
29
20
--
55
--
119
29
148
Osaka
3
--
--
--
123
--
126
--
126
Hyogo
72
220
155
30
35
14
262
264
526
Okayama
101
175
60
20
152
10
313
205
518
Hiroshima
31
359
68
204
270
179
369
742
1111
Yamaguchi
248
267
206
35
293
65
747
367
1114
Tokushima
48
53
43
10
27
0
118
63
181
Kagawa
74
182
46
31
155
73
275
286
561
Ehime
373
377
303
136
215
48
891
561
1452
Fukuoka
25
11
13
0
194
0
232
11
243
Oita
224
32
150
17
114
2
488
51
539
Total
1243
1705
1064
483
1633
391
3940
2579
6519
Percentage19.126.216.37.425.06.060.439.6100.0

Data from the Environmental Agency

Table 21. Production of Major Fishery Resources in the Seto Inland Sea (1972).

RESOURCEPRODUCTION (10,000 tons)
Fish25.3
Shrimp  5.5
Shellfish12.1
Seaweed  0.7
Coastal Culture 
 Laver (“nori”)  2.1*
 Oyster (without shell)  2.6
 Yellowtail  0.6
 Seaweed (“wakame”)  1.5

* billion sheets
Statistics from the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry

FIG. 1

FIG. 1

FIG. 2

FIG. 2

FIG. 3.

FIG. 3. OUTBREAKS OF MARINE POLLUTION CLASSIFIED ACCORDING TO POLLUTION SOURCE AND TYPE. STIPPLED AREAS OF OUTER RING INDICATE OIL-RELATED POLLUTION; UNSTIPPLED AREAS DENOTE POLLUTION UNRELATED TO PETROLEUM. (1974) [FROM THE MARITIME SAFETY WHITE PAPER, 1975].

FIG. 4.

FIG. 4. THE STATE OF DISPOSAL OF INDUSTRIAL WASTES BY MEANS OF DUMPING VESSELS (1974). NUMERALS ARE EXPRESSED IN UNITS OF ONE THOUSAND TONS. AMOUNTS OF INDUSTRIAL WASTES USED FOR LAND RECLAMATION ARE CITED IN CERTAIN CASES. [FROM THE MARITIME SAFETY WHITE PAPER, 1975].

FIG.5

FIG.5

FIG. 6

FIG. 6

FIG. 7.

FIG. 7. MAP ILLUSTRATING WATER DEPTH OF TOKYO BAY AND SURROUNDING GEOGRAPHICAL FEATURES.

FIG. 8

FIG. 8. DIAGRAMMATIC REPRESENTATION OF THE PRESENT STATE OF RECLAMATION WORKS ALONG THE COAST OF KAWASAKI, TOKYO AND CHIBA. YEARS DURING WHICH WORK WAS CONDUCTED IS DENOTED BY CROSS-SECTIONED AREA (1951–1960), HORIZONTAL LINES (1961–1965), DIAGONAL SOLID LINES (1966–1970), AND DIAGONAL STIPPLED LINES (1971–1973); BLANK BORDERED AREAS ARE THOSE UNDER CONSTRUCTION. AREAS ENCLOSED BY DOTTED LINES REPRESENT DREDGED AREAS. OTHER SYMBOLS INCLUDE THOSE FOR BREAKWATER , SHORE PROTECTION WORKS , QUAY OR BREAKWATER , WOODEN STOCKADE . From the Tokyo Metropolitan Harbor Office, March, 1974.

FIG. 9-1

FIG. 9-1

FIG. 9-2

FIG. 9-2

FIG. 10-1

FIG. 10-1

FIG. 10-2

FIG. 10-2

FIG. 11-1

FIG. 11-1

S A M P L I N G S T A T I O N D E S I G N A T I O N

FIG. 11-2

FIG. 11-2

S A M P L I N G S T A T I O N D E S I G N A T I O N

FIG. 11-3

FIG. 11-3

FIG. 12

FIG. 12

FIG. 13

FIG. 13

FIG. 14-1

FIG. 14-1

FIG. 14 - 2.

FIG. 14 - 2. SEASONAL VARIATION IN THE DENSITY OF RED TIDE ORGANISMS IN TOKYO BAY. A RED TIDE CONDITION IS DENOTED BY THE DARKENED AREAS; THE NORMAL CONDITION IS GIVEN BY DIAGONAL LINES.

FIG. 15

FIG. 15

FIG. 16

FIG. 16

FIG. 17

FIG. 17

FIG. 18-1

FIG. 18-1

FIG. 18-2

FIG. 18-2

FIG. 19

FIG. 19

FIG. 20-1

FIG. 20-1

FIG. 20-2

FIG. 20-2

FIG. 21-1

FIG. 21-1

FIG. 21-2

FIG. 21-2

FIG. 21-3

FIG. 21-3

FIG. 22(a)

FIG. 22(a)

FIG. 22(b)

FIG. 22(b)

FIG. 22(c)

FIG. 22(c)

FIG. 22(d)

FIG. 22(d)

FIG. 22(e)

FIG. 22(e)

FIG. 23(a)

FIG. 23(a)

FIG. 23(b)

FIG. 23(b)

FIG. 24-1

FIG. 24-1

FIG. 24-2

FIG. 24-2

FIG. 24-3

FIG. 24-3

FIG. 24-4

FIG. 24-4

FIG. 24-5

FIG. 24-5

FIG. 25

FIG. 25

FIG. 26

FIG. 26

FIG. 27

FIG. 27

FIG. 28

FIG. 28

FIG. 29

FIG. 29

FIG. 30

FIG. 30

FIG. 31.

FIG. 31. CASES OF OIL POLLUTION IN DIFFERENT AREAS OF THE SETO INLAND SEA. From “The Present Situation of Maritime Safety, 1974”, by the Maritime Safety Agency.

FIG. 32.

FIG. 32. CASES OF OIL POLLUTION ACCORDING TO VESSEL DISTINCTION. From “The Present Situation of Maritime Safety, 1974”, by the Maritime Safety Agency.

FIG. 33.

FIG. 33. EEL GRASS (“amamo,” Zostera) ZONES PRIOR TO 1965 IN DIFFERENT REGIONS OF THE SETO INLAND SEA, AND THEIR REDUCTION RATES UP TO 1965. BLACK - PROPORTION OF REMAINING AREA; WHITE - PROPORTION OF VANISHED AREA. NUMBERS SHOW THE AREA IN HECTARES PRIOR TO 1965. Data from the Southwest Regional Fisheries Research Laboratory.

FIG. 34.

FIG. 34. EEL GRASS (“amamo,” Zostera) ZONES PRIOR TO 1965 IN DIFFERENT REGIONS OF THE SETO INLAND SEA, AND THEIR REDUCTION RATES BETWEEN THE YEARS 1965 TO 1971. SYMBOLIC REPRESENTATION AND NUMERALS ARE THE SAME AS GIVEN IN FIG. 33. Data from the Southwest Regional Fisheries Research Laboratory.

FIG. 35

FIG. 35

FIG. 36

FIG. 36

FIG. 37.

FIG. 37. CHANGES IN THE AMOUNT OF MAJOR FISHERIES PRODUCTS IN THE SETO INLAND SEA. Data from the Fishery and Aquaculture Yearbook of the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry for 1953, and the Fisheries Statistic Table in the Seto Inland Sea from the Chugoku-Shikoku Agricultural Administration Bureau for the years 1958 to 1973.

FIG. 38.

FIG. 38. CHANGES IN THE AMOUNT OF MAJOR MARINE PRODUCTS (MARINE ANIMALS, SHELLFISH, AND SEAWEEDS) IN THE SETO INLAND SEA. Data from the Fishery and Aquaculture Yearbook of the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry for 1953, and the Fisheries Statistic Table in the Seto Inland Sea from the Chugoku-Shikoku Agricultural Administration Bureau for the years 1958 to 1973.

FIG. 39.

FIG. 39. CHANGES IN THE CATCHES OF DIFFERENT FISHES. Data from the Fishery and Aquaculture Yearbook of the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry for 1953, and the Fisheries Statistic Table in the Seto Inland Sea from the Chugoku-Shikoku Agricultural Administration Bureau for the years 1958 to 1973.

FIG. 40.

FIG. 40. AREAS OF THE SETO INLAND SEA WHICH HAVE BEEN DESIGNATED AS THOSE WHERE RECLAMATION WORK SHOULD BE AVOIDED. Data from the Environmental Agency.

FIG. I

Supplementary FIG. I

FIG. II

Supplementary FIG. II

FIG. III

Supplementary FIG. III


Back Cover

Previous Page Top of Page