Previous Page Table of Contents Next Page


Paper 6.0: Silage from by-products for smallholders - Kayouli Chedly and Stephen Lee


Kayouli Chedly

Stephen Lee



Institut National Agronomique de Tunisie

Brooklyn Valley, Rd 3

43 Ave Charles Nicole

Motueka

1082 Tunis, Tunisia

New Zealand



Tel: +216+ 189 2785

Tel: +643+ 528 0476

Fax: +216+ 179 9391

Fax: +643+ 528 8967

E Mail: [email protected]

E Mail: [email protected]

INTRODUCTION

The livestock sector plays a significant economic role in most developing countries, and is essential for the food security of their rural population. It contributes to poverty alleviation and provides elements that are essential to the national economy, such as: traction power, transport, manure as fertilizer and fuel, food, fibre, leather, savings bank, and by generating significant household cash income through sales of live animals or livestock products.

However, among the major constraints limiting the development of livestock production in many developing countries, inadequacy of animal feed resources is most often the crucial factor. Feed shortages, both quantitative and qualitative, limit livestock productivity. During ploughing of crop fields, these shortages seriously affect the working ability of oxen, and they also depress the production of dairy and meat units managed by small-scale commercial farmers.

In many tropical countries, e.g. in Africa, Latin America and the South Pacific Islands, the bulk of livestock feed resources comes from grazing poor quality annual and perennial grasses on natural pastures, often at a late stage of maturity. In other countries, such as those in Southeast Asia, livestock farming is increasingly being limited by the restriction of grazing lands. During the long dry season (at least 6-7 months each year), animals are on poor quality feeds, characterized by low palatability, low intake and low nitrogen. However, crop residues (straw and stover from sorghum, millet, wheat, barley, rice, maize, etc.) play a key role in animal feeding, especially in Asia and Africa.

As there is an incipient urban market demand for milk around the largest cities in most developing countries, there is an increasing development of small-scale peri-urban dairy units, based mainly on pure Friesian cows. However, the smallholder dairy producers often face low milk yields from these exotic cattle due to poor feeding management (lack of rations with balanced nutritive content) and/or high production costs because their feeding system is primarily based on purchased feeds and concentrates.

It is recognized in developed countries that the production of silage of high quality cultivated forage can be a valuable component for the development of a high-performing and low-cost system of animal production, using a relatively low level of purchased concentrates. However, this appears inappropriate for smallholders in tropical countries, primarily due to:

- lack or high cost, or both, of equipment for harvesting and conservation; and

- production of cultivated forage being often limited due to lack of available land.

Most farmers in developing countries rely for their food security on the cultivation of cereals, root crops and high-value crops such as fruits and vegetables, which understandably take priority in the allocation of land.

Fruit, vegetables and root crops are increasingly integrated in the farming system and play a key role as staples in the human diet in most developing countries. Consequently, there is a wide range of valuable by-products and residues resulting from food cropping systems and food processing, which are often inefficiently or totally under-utilized and wasted.

The ensiling of by-products is a simple and appropriate method of conservation. It is the most effective way to improve animal feed resources through the rational use of locally available agricultural and industrial-by products likely to be available to small-scale farmers at village level. In developed countries, herbage ensiling is now accepted as the major method of forage conservation, and much research has been undertaken in that field (McDonald, 1983; Thomas, 1985). However very few research and extension activities are related to the various aspects of silage production from by-products.

This paper aims to examine some of the practical aspects of making and utilizing silage from by-products by small-scale farmers. There are very large amounts of various by-products in tropical countries and it is not possible to provide a global review on this topic. Our contribution is therefore restricted to our experience in North Africa (from the first author) and experience in two projects financed by the Technical Cooperation Programme of FAO, first in Samoa, repeated subsequently in Tonga, managed by both authors.

ADVANTAGES OF SILAGE MAKING FROM LOCAL CROP RESIDUES AND BY-PRODUCTS

The problem usually encountered with agro by-products is seasonality of supply, which is often accentuated by their high moisture content. High-moisture agro-industrial by-products are often of high nutritional value. In industrial countries, there are well-developed technologies for recovering by-products and converting them into protein-rich meals and/or energy-rich concentrates. However, such facilities are rarely found in tropical less-developed countries, especially at the level of small villages, where by-products often become contaminating wastes: they quickly go sour, mouldy and lose considerable quantities of soluble nutrients in the effluent. Dehydration increases cost: between 250 and 300 litre of fuel and 200 kWh of electricity are required to produce 1 t of dry product (88 - 90% DM). Research has shown that the ensiling of by-products is the most suitable method of conservation for long periods (Lien et al., 1994; Bouqué and Fiems, 1988; Hadjipanayiotou, 1993, 1994; Kayouli, 1989; Kayouli et al., 1993; Kayouli and Lee, 1998).

The main advantages of silage are:

(i) it can be efficiently used for strategic off-season feeding;

(ii) it is a means of increasing feed resource availability and a form of insurance, especially for calving dairy cows;

(iii) it can be fed to reduce pressure on pasture when required;

(iv) it can be an efficient supplement to grazing cattle during the dry season;

(v) it is an inexpensive home-made feed, resulting in the production of milk and beef at lower cost;

(vi) it improves palatability, reduces significantly toxic substances present in some fresh vegetables to safe level concentrations (such as cyanogenic glucosides in fresh cassava leaves) and destroys harmful micro-organisms possibly present in poultry litter or fish wastes; and

(vii) it can provide a major diet source, as basal ration as well as a feed supplement for grazing animals.

BY-PRODUCTS WIDELY AVAILABLE IN TROPICAL AND SUB-TROPICAL COUNTRIES POTENTIALLY SUITABLE TO SILAGE MAKING

In tropical and sub-tropical countries, there is a wide range of by-products and residues from food crops and food processing that are potentially valuable feed supplements, without considering residues from cereal grain. The most common by-products from various root and tuber crops, fruit crops, agro-industry and animal industries are discussed in the following sections.

Brewer’s spent grains

The extracted malt or spent grain contains 75-80% water when filtered off. Wet spent grain spoils quickly and should be used fresh or stored out of contact with air. It can be stored for up to two weeks quite successfully by heaping it, treading it well and covering with sacks or plastic sheets. For longer storage, it may be ensiled in an airtight trench silo with drainage. Ensiling in tightly tied plastic bags is also an effective storage method (this method will be described in detail later). Wet spent grain can be ensiled alone or in association with other ingredients, such as with 2-3% molasses (to ensure proper fermentation), chopped banana by-products (trunk, pseudostems, fruit, peel) or chopped cassava. The latter has the advantage of absorbing the juice from spent grain and consequently limiting losses during fermentation. The quantities to be incorporated depend on availability. However, in any case, the DM content in the ensiled mass should not exceed 45%, in order to ensure proper fermentation.

Brewer’s spent grain is a valuable potential supplementary feed for livestock. It is a safe feed when it is used fresh or properly stored. It is a relatively bulky feed, but a good source of energy and protein (Table 1). It can be used to feed beef cattle (10-15 kg daily) and calves (2-4 kg daily). However, it is far more suitable in rations for dairy cows. Spent grain is a balanced feed for dairy cows and has a good reputation for stimulating milk production. Milk yield response is very rapid and production significantly increases when lactating cows are fed spent grain as a supplement. Wet grain can be given in large amounts to dairy cows, up to 15 kg per day. In order to avoid off-flavours in the milk, it is recommended that spent grain be fed to cows after rather than before milking. When it is eaten in large quantities (15-20 kg/day), distribution of 100-150 g of sodium bicarbonate given twice daily is recommended in order to prevent rumen acidosis disorder.

Banana by-products

Bananas are grown in almost all farms in the humid tropics and constitute one of the staple foods for human consumption. Banana plant waste is of considerable importance in feeding ruminants. The by-products are the following:

Rejected banana. Rejected bananas - both green, immature and ripe - are a good source of energy supplement for grazing or penned animals. Dairy cows relish them and can consume them in fairly large amounts. However, bananas have low contents of CF, CP (see Table 1) and minerals, and should therefore be fed together with grass or another source of roughage (in order to avoid rumen disturbance) as well as with protein and mineral supplementation. When the rejected bananas are widely available, a good silage can be made from chopped bananas mixed with one or several protein-rich feeds, such as poultry litter, dry spent grain, fish waste and cassava leaves.

Banana leaves and pseudostems (trunks). Banana pseudostems (trunks) and leaves are useful sources of roughage in many tropical countries, mainly during the dry season. They can be chopped and fed fresh or ensiled. As pseudostems are low in protein and minerals, they are more efficiently used when supplemented with rich-protein ingredients, such as copra meal, multi-nutrient feed blocks, cassava leaves, poultry manure or spent grain.

Feed

DM (%)

Per kg DM

Per kg Fresh Matter

Inclusion rate fresh

ME (MJ/kg)

CP (g/kg)

CF (g/kg)

ME (MJ/kg)

CP (g/kg)

CF (g/kg)

(kg/day)

Spent grain

22.0

8.2

260

130

1.8

57.2

28.6

5-20

Banana stems

9.5

5.5

20

210

0.52

1.9

20.0

5-10

Banana skin (ripe)

15.0

6.7

42

77

1.0

6.3

11.6

2-5

Rejected banana (ripe)

30.0

11.5

54

22

3.5

16.2

6.6

2-5

Cassava leaves

16.0

6.7

235

190

1.1

37.6

30.4

3-6

Cassava roots

28.5

12.5

16

52

3.6

4.6

14.8

5-15

Molasses

78.0

11.5

15

0.00

9.0

11.7

0

0.5-2

Breadfruit (ripe fruit)

29.8

10.8

57

49

3.2

17.0

14.6

4-8

Taro leaves

16.0

6.2

223

114

1.0

35.7

18.2

1-2

Taro Roots

25.0

13.2

45

20

3.3

11.25

5

2-5

Sweet potato (leaves)

12.0

5.8

200

145

0.7

24.0

17.4

10-20

Sweet potato (tuber)

30.0

13.5

70

25

4.1

21.0

7.5

5-10

Yam (leaves)

24.0

7.3

120

250

1.8

28.8

60

2-5

Yam (root)

34.0

13.5

80

25

4.6

27.2

8.5

2-5

Poultry litter

82

8.2

265

145

6.7

217.3

119.0

0.5-2

Olive cake

45.5

3.8

40

465

1.7

18.2

211.6

2-4

Olive leaves

56.8

5.7

105

300

3.2

59.6

170.4

3-6

Grape marc

37.1

4.9

138

410

1.8

51.2

152.1

1-3

Sugar-beet pulp

19.5

9.8

91

316

1.9

17.4

61.6

up to 20

Tomato pulp

22.5

8.0

215

350

1.8

48.4

78.8

up to 15

Wheat bran

89.1

8.1

160

137

7.3

142.6

122.1

1-3

Date palm fruit

87.6

12.0

32

50

10.5

28.0

43.8

0.5-1

Citrus pulp

23

10.3

75

200

2.4

17.3

46

up to 15

Key to columns: DM = dry matter. ME = metabolizable energy. CP = crude protein. CF = crude fibre (ADF).

The use of chopped and ensiled pseudostems is particularly recommended when the bunch has been harvested and plants are cut down; the large quantity of trunks available at harvest time can be safely preserved through a well-planned silage operation. The silage is of good quality when chopped pseudostems are properly mixed with an easily fermentable carbohydrate (such as molasses or sliced root vegetables) and protein-rich feeds (such as poultry litter or wet spent grain).

Root crops

The major root crops that are potentially available for animal feeding in tropical countries are cassava, taro, sweet potato and yams.

Cassava by-products. Both the roots and the leaves are valuable feed resources for dairy cattle. Fresh and sun-dried cassava roots are consumed by ruminants in different forms (sliced, chopped, ground) and used as a substitute for cereal grains in many countries. Cassava roots are a good energy source for dairy cattle, because they are high in carbohydrate, which is an important and readily available energy source for rumen microbes. However, they are low in protein (Table 1). They are particularly efficiently used by high producing cows and in the first stage of lactation. Cassava roots can be given in large quantities: up to 25% of total DM intake. However, protein and mineral supplements must be fed in order to balance the ration. As cassava roots are rich in easily fermentable carbohydrates, they constitute an excellent energy additive when they are chopped and ensiled with other feed resources, such as fish waste, cassava leaves, banana pseudostems, spent grain, poultry litter, etc. The cassava leaves are also a potential and valuable protein feed for ruminants (Table 1). It is estimated that when leaves are harvested at the same time as the roots, yields are in the range of 1 to 4 t DM/ha. Fresh cassava leaves have been successfully fed to cattle, including dairy cows, in many countries.

Fresh raw cassava contains cyanogenic glucosides (HCN compounds) that are toxic to monogastrics, but leaves can be fed fresh to ruminants, as rumen micro-organisms appear to be able to detoxify the HCN. However, this is easily removed during processing by sun drying or ensiling. Ensiling cassava leaves is the simplest method, not only to significantly reduce HCN concentrations to safe levels for monogastrics, but also to preserve the nutritive value of harvested cassava leaves for efficient use for off-season feeding of dairy cows. The freshly harvested leaves are first chopped, and can be ensiled alone or mixed with energy-rich feeds, such as banana wastes, root vegetables, wet spent grain, etc. The whole cassava plant (including root and aerial parts) can also be chopped and ensiled in the same way. The silage is fairly balanced for dairy cows.

Taro. Taro is the staple food of the population in many tropical countries. Taro by-products include roots, trimmings, leaves and stems: all potentially valuable feed supplements. Taro roots are outstanding as a feed, being particularly rich in energy. Raw taro contains substances that irritate the tongue and palate of animals, so that it must be cooked to improve its nutritional usefulness, mainly for monogastrics. The leaves are rich in protein (Table 1) and are relished by cattle. Taro by-products can be chopped and ensiled in association with the aforementioned feed resources. Silage making reduces considerably undesirable substances in taro by-products, which thus become more appetising.

Sweet potato. Sweet potato is another root crop grown by farmers in many tropical countries. The by-products are roots, offcuts, leaves and vines. Roots have low protein, fat and fibre concentrations (Table 1), but they are high in carbohydrates, whilst foliage has a lower carbohydrate concentration but higher fibre and protein concentrations (Table 1). The vines, which are usually wasted, can serve as a nutritive and relished green supplement for cattle. A mixture of waste bananas, cassava roots and sweet potato tubers and leaves can be ensiled effectively without the need for additives.

Yams. Yams are also widely grown in many tropical countries. Their nutritional value is limited by their bitter alkaloid concentration, as well as of tannins and saponins. Yams must be cooked to improve their nutritional usefulness if they are to be fed to monogastrics or calves. The by-products include roots, offcuts, leaves and vines. Vines are a valuable cattle feed and can be successfully ensiled mixed with other feed ingredients indicated above.

Wet pulps from fruit and vegetables (citrus and pineapple pulps and leaves)

Many fruits are grown in tropical countries: mango, papaya, pineapple, citrus, etc. Fruit wastes and leaves are potential feed resources. The most suitable method for conserving these materials is to ensile them with the aforementioned ingredients, to ensure good fermentation and enhance the silage quality with their high sugar concentration.

Almost all Mediterranean countries produce large amounts of citrus for local consumption and export. Citrus pulp is the residue remaining after the extraction of citrus juice: it represents approximately half of the fruit and has a mean DM content of 20% (Boucqué and Fiems, 1988). Citrus pulp is an energy-rich feed resource with high metabolizable energy content (Table 1). The ensiling of the citrus pulp, damaged fruits and leftovers, in combination with other by-products with high protein concentration, such as poultry litter and wheat bran, is a simple and appropriate method of conservation that can make a significant contribution to the feeding requirements of ruminants, mainly for high-yielding cows in early stages of lactation. In addition, ensiling citrus wastes has advantages over traditional drying, in that less energy is used, cost of processing is much reduced and there is improved palatability.

Fish by-products

Fish by-products are usually obtained from inedible whole fish or from waste from fish processing industries. This is an excellent source of protein and minerals for livestock, mainly for cows that have recently calved and for high-yielding cows. The ensiling of the by-products in combination with other easily available feeds rich in fermentable carbohydrates, such as molasses, sweet potato or cassava roots, is a simple and appropriate method of conservation that has been successfully applied recently in some countries. In all cases, the maximum amount of fish wastes that can be included in the silage is 50% with a dry source of carbohydrates, and much lower - about 10% - with fresh sources.

Poultry litter

Another potential feed resource is poultry litter, which is available from some intensive poultry farms in developing countries. Poultry litter and manure contain about 25% crude protein on a DM basis, about half of which derives from uric acid, which can be efficiently used by rumen microbes for protein production. Poultry litter is also rich in minerals. The results of many experiments around the world indicate that dried or ensiled poultry litter can be successfully included in the feed of ruminants as a protein supplement. The ensiling of the poultry litter is a simple and appropriate method of conservation. It has proved to be an excellent ingredient for cattle feeding, and the process significantly destroys harmful micro-organisms possibly present in poultry litter. Silage made from poultry litter, chopped root crops and banana by-products provides a balanced diet for dairy cows.

Tomato pulp

Tomato is the most popular vegetable crop grown in Mediterranean countries where there are numerous tomato-processing plants. Tomato processing residues called tomato pulp (a mixture of peel and seed) accounts for about one-fifth of fresh weight and has a high nutritional value. It is a particularly protein-rich feed resource (Table 1). Fresh tomato pulp becomes sour and mouldy rapidly because it is traditionally processed during summer and has a high moisture content, approximately 80-84%. Consequently, it is advisable to ensile tomato pulp in alternate layers with dry by-products, such as chopped straw, wheat bran and poultry litter, so that the liquid effluent is absorbed and used. Good-quality silages made from such combinations are successfully used by small farmers in Tunisia to feed dairy cows and fattening steers (Kayouli, 1989).

Pressed olive cake

The production of olive oil is basically confined to the Mediterranean basin. Large amounts of crude olive cake, a residue of kernels and pulp left after oil extraction, are produced yearly. Despite its low nutritive value (Table 1), this by-product is a potential feed resource, mainly during periods of feed shortage. Usually, crude olive cake stored in heaps next to the processing plant deteriorates quickly because of its high lipid concentration - between 10 and 14%. The voluntary intake of such cake decreases with storage duration. Ensiling fresh olive cake either alone or with high-quality by-products, such as wheat bran, poultry litter or tomato pulp, improves storage quality and gives a well-preserved, palatable feedstuff. This technique was tried ten years ago in Tunisia (Kayouli et al., 1993), and then successfully adopted by many smallholders in the vicinity of olive oil processing plants.

Grape marc

After pressing 100 kg of grapes, there remains 5 to 10 kg of grape marc (seed and pulp), with about 50% DM content and relatively low nutritive value (Table 1). Ensiling fresh grape marc either alone or with high-quality by-products, such as wheat bran, poultry litter or tomato pulp, improves storage quality and gives a well-preserved, palatable feedstuff (Hadjipanayiotou, 1987).

SILAGE-MAKING FROM BY-PRODUCTS

The basic principles of silage making from by-products are the same as for silage-making from green forage, so attention must be paid first to ensuring anaerobic conditions, i.e. the by-products must be stored under airtight conditions at all times, and, second, there must be sufficient natural acid in the silage to restrict the activities of undesirable bacteria (for this the ensiled material must be sufficiently rich in carbohydrates).

In order to achieve a successful ensiling of by-products, the following parameters require very careful attention:

(i) Moisture content Ensiled material should contain more than 50% moisture so that it is easy to compress it tightly in order to obtain good compaction and to eliminate air. However, excessive moisture, more than 75%, can also be harmful, leading to an undesirable fermentation in later phases, producing sour silage, which reduces palatability and intake. Water can be added and/or wet and dry feeds can be mixed to get the desired moisture content.

(ii) Length of chopping The finer the chopping, the better the compaction and therefore the more successful the storage, due to the effective exclusion of air. Chopping into small pieces can be done by hand or with a stationary forage chopper.

(iii) The time it takes to fill a silo The rapid filling and sealing of the silo is very important because slow filling or delayed covering can easily increase feed losses due to extended aerobic fermentation.

(iv) Presence of enough easily fermentable energy (naturally present or added) The major objective in silage fermentation is to achieve a stable low pH at which biological activity virtually ceases. In this way preservation is obtained whilst minimizing nutrient losses and avoiding adverse changes in the chemical composition of the material. The final pH of the ensiled by-product depends largely on the carbohydrate content in the original materials. Hence, protein-rich feeds with low energy content are very difficult to ensile successfully, and should be mixed with easily fermentable, energy-rich products, e.g. molasses, banana waste or root crops.

The technique of silage making from by-products was extensively described by Kayouli and Lee (1998). The silage can be stored in stacked layers, packed in succession on a soil surface that has been covered beforehand with a plastic sheet or banana leaves. This heap, once finished, is then tightly covered with banana leaves or plastic sheets, pressed down by some heavy objects, which are placed on top. Packed silage in plastic bags that are tightly closed is also an effective storage method. This storage method is easy to handle and has the potential to produce high quality silage with less waste in a well-sealed bag. However, it is not recommended for coarse materials, such as banana trunk and cassava leaves, which can puncture the bag and render the contents useless.

After approximately 6 weeks, the farmer can open the silo and start to feed silage to animals. Silage can be suitably preserved for as long as air is kept away from the ensiled material; it is therefore possible to store airtight silage for more than 6 months. Once the silo is open, care must be taken to cover again the ensiled material after each opening that is made to feed the animals.

PRACTICAL EXAMPLES OF SUCCESSFUL SILAGE COMBINATIONS

Crop residues and by-products vary in their composition and physical structure. Within this paper, it is impossible to provide a review of all combinations possible in silage making and therefore it will be restricted to those that have been successfully applied. However, in order to succeed in silage making, the following should be borne in mind:

(i) Carbohydrate or energy-rich feeds, such as crop roots, rejected bananas or fruit wastes, can be successfully ensiled alone.

(ii) Energy- and protein-rich by-products, such as spent grain or tomato pulp, can be successfully ensiled alone.

(iii) Fibre-rich feeds with low energy and protein concentrations, such as banana pseudostems, olive cake and grape marc, are better utilized ensiled in combination with energy-rich by-products.

(iv) Protein-rich materials with low energy content, such as cassava leaves, fish waste or poultry litter, should not be ensiled alone. However, this type of feed can be successfully ensiled when mixed with one or several energy-rich products such as crop roots, rejected bananas, spent grain or molasses. This type of silage is highly recommended because it provides a balanced diet.

(v) Incorporation of molasses in silage is optional; nevertheless, this is an excellent additive to ensure good conservation and enhance the silage quality of any ensiled feed resource.

Incorporation rate of the different ingredients to be ensiled is function of:

- the amount of by-product(s) available; and

- the animal types to be fed.

Thus a high-quality silage, containing increased proportions of energy-rich ingredients such as spent grain or crop roots, should be prepared for high-yielding dairy cows, while high proportions of cassava leaves and banana pseudostems can be used when there is seasonal feed shortage and therefore when silage would compose the bulk diet during off-season feeding.

Several silage combinations from various by-products and crop residues were successfully developed in two projects funded by the Technical Cooperation Programme of FAO, first in Samoa: (TCP/SAM/6611, Milk Production Areas and Small Milk Processing Units), repeated subsequently in Tonga (TCP/TON/8821, Smallholder Forage-Based Dairy Production) and expanded to a South Pacific Sub-Regional basis as GCP/SAM/007/FRA, Dairy Production and Processing Units.

As an example, the following silage combination (on a % weight basis) was efficiently preserved, with a good smell and low pH (between 3.5 and 4.5):

chopped cassava leaves (15%);
chopped cassava roots (25%);
chopped banana pseudostems (10%);
spent grain (30%);
poultry litter (10%); and
molasses (10%).

The silage, when fed as a supplement to grazing dairy cows, gave a big increase in milk production in those South Pacific Islands. The impact has been excellent; smallholders were particularly impressed by the ease with which they could use locally available materials to quickly and cheaply increase milk production. The improved performance due to supplementary feeding with silage appeared as fast and very significant increases in milk production. As most of the project cooperating farmers were selling milk, this positive production effect of feeding silage has been directly translated into immediately increased financial returns.

Two suitable dairy rations using the above silage combination are presented in Table 2, where the basal diet is from either grazing improved pasture under coconut plantations or cut-and-carry elephant grass.

Table 2. Dairy rations based on grazing or cut-and-carry in combination with silage

Feed Supplement
kg/day (fresh basis)

Milk yield (kg/day)

5

10

15

20

25

Case 1 - Basal diet from grazing improved pasture under coconut plantations

Copra meal

1

2

3

3

3

Spent grain



5

10

10

Silage(1) (30% DM)


10-15

15-20

20-25

20-25

Case 2 - Basal diet from chopped elephant grass (cut-and-carry system)

Chopped elephant grass

40

40

40

50

50

Copra meal

1

2

3

3

3

Spent grain


10

15

20

25

Silage(1) (30% DM)


10

15

25

25

Notes: (1) Silage combination as described in the text

Large amounts of agro-industrial by-products and crop residues produced in the Mediterranean basin (citrus pulp, grape marc, tomato pulp, olive cake, wheat bran, etc.) have been successfully ensiled in different ways as sole ingredients or in different associations. Such silage making practices are extensively practised by numerous farmers and replace conventional feedstuffs, including imported concentrates (Kayouli et al., 1993; Kayouli, 1989; Hadjipanayiotou, 1987, 1993).

Table 3. Feed intake and performance of growing lambs fed a diet of ensiled poultry litter or of concentrates


Ensiled poultry litter diet(1)

Concentrate diet

In vivo organic matter digestibility (%)

61.4

74.9

Retained nitrogen (g/day)

33.0

37.2

Feed intake (g DM/day)

1 520.0

1 098.0

Daily gain (g/day)

252.8

221.2

Feed conversion (kg DM/day)

6.1

5.4

Carcass yield (%)

47.5

45.1

Feed cost (US$/kg gain)

0.4

0.8

Notes: (1) For details, see text. Experimental parameters: 12 animals per treatment; 66-day trial.

Source: Kayouli et al., 1993

Screened poultry litter has been successfully ensiled with olive cake and wheat bran (45:45:10% w/w/w, DM basis). Water was added to obtain 50% DM in the silage, based on DM content of the ingredients. After 6 weeks, results indicated that the ensiling technique was efficient for conservation of poultry litter at low cost, and eliminated health hazards. The litter silage was substituted for commercial concentrate and soybean meal and fed to lambs in a growing trial over 66 days (Kayouli et al., 1993). Results in Table 3 show that daily gain and feed intake registered with the experimental diet were higher than those on the concentrate diet, while feed cost was lower by 50% with the poultry-litter-silage group.

In another trial on beef fattening (Kayouli, 1989), an experimental diet containing ensiled sugar beet pulp and poultry litter was compared to a control diet (sugar beet pulp and concentrate with a high content of soybean meal) fed to fattening beef over a 150-day period. Animal performances (growth rate, feed conversion and carcass quality) were similar, while feeding cost was reduced by 20% with the experimental diet.

CONCLUSION

In order to increase farm incomes from livestock in developing countries, an adequate low-cost feeding system must be developed. Making silage from agricultural, agro-industrial and fishery by-products is a proven system offering considerable potential to improve farm incomes and profits. Agriculture Ministries should survey the types, qualities, quantities and seasonal availability of by-products available in their country. The current levels of utilization should also be assessed.

Whilst farmers will tend to opt for utilizing by-products they can easily identify and acquire locally, government officers can improve by-product utilization by assessing the “whole picture” of by-product availability, and advising farmers accordingly.

Practical programmes of research and extension are recommended in each country. These should create and demonstrate a range of model feeding systems based on ensiled by-products in addition to other available feeds. Such feeding systems would have formulations based on local or national by-product availability, feeding requirements and critical annual periods of feed shortage.

Development of by-product silage production can yield continuity of good quality feed availability even in times of drought, at low cost. Small-scale farmers easily make such feeds with simple technology.

Different types of silage can be made by altering the formula - i.e. varying the choice and mix of by-products. In this way, the individual needs of different classes of livestock can be met.

Wider adoption of these technologies will benefit low-income rural communities through improved income and food security, and also the wider community through the better availability of reasonably priced animal products and by a decrease in pollution formerly caused by by-product waste.

REFERENCES

Bouqué, C.V., & Fiems, L.0. 1988. Vegetable by-products of agro-industrial origin. Livest. Prod. Sc., 19: 97-135.

Hadjipanayiotou, M. 1987. Experience in the Near East with the utilization of non-conventional feedstuffs and the various systems of feeding. (FAO) Animal Production and Health Paper, No.54: 185-210.

Hadjipanayiotou, M. 1993. Voluntary intake of citrus pulp-poultry litter silage by growing female Friesian calves, chios lambs and Damascus kids. Agricultural Research Institute, Nicosia Techn. Bull., No.155.

Hadjipanayiotou, M. 1994. Voluntary intake and performance of ruminant animals offered poultry litter olive cake silage. Livest. Res. Rural Dev., 6: 10.

Kayouli, C. 1989 A strategy for animal nutrition in the dry sub-tropics. p. 201-206, in: Proc. of the Ministry of Agriculture, Egypt/ESAP/EAAP/FAO/ICAMS/WAAP Intl. Symp. on the Constraints and Possibilities of Ruminant Production in the Sub-Tropics. Cairo, Egypt, November 1988. Wageningen, The Netherlands: PUDOC.

Kayouli, C., Demeyer, D., & Accacha, M. 1993. Evaluation of poultry litter and olive cakes as an alternative feed for ruminant production in Tunisia. p. 420-440, in: Proc. Intl. Conf. on Increasing Livestock Production through Utilisation of Local Resources. Beijing, China, 18-22 October 1993.

Kayouli, C., & Lee, S. 1998. Supplementary feeding for dairy smallholders in Pacific Island Countries: Fiji, Samoa, Vanuatu, Cook Islands, Solomon Islands and Tonga. p. 67-101, in: S. Lee, R. Kennard & C. Kayouli (eds) Manual of Smallholder Milk Production in the South Pacific. FAO Sub-Regional Office for the Pacific, Apia, Samoa.

Lien, L.V., Sansoucy, R., & Thien, N. 1994. Preserving shrimp heads and animal blood with molasses and feeding them with a supplement for pigs. p. 59-62, in:. T.R. Preston, B. Ogle, Le Viet Ly & Lu Trong Hieu (eds) Proc. Nat. Seminar-Workshop “Sustainable Livestock Production on Local Feed Resources.” Ho Chi Minh City, 22-27 November 1993.

McDonald, P. 1983. Hannah Research Institute Annual Report. p. 59-67.

Thomas, C. 1985. p 223 - 256, in: W. Haresign & D.J.A Cole (eds) Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition. London: Butterworths.


Previous Page Top of Page Next Page