Previous PageTable Of ContentsNext Page

EXPERIENCE 3
INDIGENOUS FOREST MANAGEMENT - CAMBODIA

CBNRM AMONGST INDIGENOUS PEOPLE IN RATANAKI PROVINCE

 

Theme: Issue Analysis for Action

Learning Objective: To expand participants' skills at analyzing the issues to be addressed by the communication initiative.

 

Please review the experience below. Then attempt to re-describe and debate this experience according to the analytical process described in the "problem tree" approach within Participatory Rural Communication Appraisal.30 You will find this process at the end of the experience.

PROJECT

This project supports indigenous people living in the highland jungles of Cambodia's Ratanakiri Province, to control and sustainably earn a livelihood from the forests they have traditionally inhabited.

The International Development Research Centre (IDRC) initiated the project in 1996. In 1997, the Centre combined forces with the Cambodia Area Rehabilitation and Regeneration Project (CARERE), a rural development project funded by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP).

CONTEXT

Long after the fall of the Khmer Rouge regime in 1979, rebels lurked in the jungles of Ratanakiri, a province in northeast Cambodia. Outsiders stayed away from the forest, which meant that the forest remained intact. However in the early 1990s, the situation changed. The rebels gradually gave up their arms - and the logging trucks started to arrive.They came by the hundreds, rumbling up and down the country's main highway - a narrow red dirt road - taking loads of lumber across the border to Viet Nam. Settlers from other parts of Cambodia also poured into Ratanakiri, and investors bought up huge tracts of land to grow cash crops. Jungle gave way to plantations and fields, and forest resources began to disappear.

This has created serious problems - particularly for indigenous people, who rely on the forest for their livelihood. Although most of Cambodia's population is Khmer, in Ratanakiri province almost three-quarters of the population belongs to an ethnic minority. The province's six ethnic minorities are collectively known as Highlanders. In the traditionally hierarchical society of Cambodia, these people had never spoken up for their rights - until they became involved in a CBNRM project.

Many Highlanders rely exclusively on the forest to survive. As Seu Chelone, a woman who lives in Som Thom Commune explains: "We need firewood, vegetables, fruit, mushrooms, bamboo shoots, and we can have these things from the forest. We see the forest as our market."

ISSUES/PROBLEMS

  1. After years of relative isolation due to the area's occupation by Khmer Rouge rebels, the area has opened up, bringing logging and cash cropping, and with them the loss of jungle and forest resources.
  2. The local ethnic minorities or "Highlanders" make up the majority of the province's population, but are traditionally discriminated against in Cambodian society.
  3. Many of these people depend on the forest and jungle for their livelihoods, but these livelihoods are now at risk as forest companies and settlers move into the area to take trees and clear land for cash crops.

LEVEL

Cambodian researchers work with community members, whom they train to map local resources and document local knowledge. The communities have used the knowledge and training to lobby provincial and national governments about land use permits, and laws protecting indigenous people's right to possess and use public land and support their traditional livelihood practices.

PROCESS/METHOD

In the project, Highlanders from three communes (Som Thom, Yeak Lom and Ochum) began working with Cambodian researchers to map forest resources, and document indigenous knowledge of the forest. A core team of community members received technical training in mapping skills, and participatory action research techniques. This team then trained villagers, showing them how to record observations and collect data in the field. Villagers created land use maps, sketching boundaries and documenting land uses. Their findings were verified by the research team, which used global positioning systems (GPS) to double-check that privately owned land had not been inadvertently included.

RESULTS AND REFLECTIONS

"We wondered if they went and cut the forest just anywhere," says Nehm Sovanna, the national team leader for the Ratanakiri project. "But we found there is a very clear mechanism for using their natural resources and protecting them. They have specific areas for swidden agriculture where they rotate crops. In swidden agriculture, you cut the forest, you burn it, you cultivate it, and then you move and let the forest grow back for ten to 20 years. There is also the wildlife forest, watershed forest and spirit [or sacred] forest."

Highlanders protect the tall trees of the spirit forests: to cut them is to invite disaster. According to traditional beliefs, "If you cut down a tree from the spirit forest, something bad will happen," explains a villager. "For example, maybe a tiger might eat you."

When researchers examined one of the spirit forests, they realised this area would not regenerate if it were cut. The soil was not fertile enough and the area was too exposed to wind and rain. "We found out that, yes, it is right: you really cannot cut the spirit forest," says Mr. Sovanna.

This finding bolstered the Highlanders' confidence in their traditional mechanisms for managing forest resources, which had broken down as loggers, investors and settlers moved to Ratanakiri. Tempted by offers of cash, some Highlanders were leading loggers to the best trees or selling their land - their only resource - to speculators. In addition, outsiders started farming land the Highlanders had left fallow.

To help gain recognition for traditional management systems, part of the project focused on documenting boundaries of traditional resource areas. Villagers also agreed on rules and regulations for community forest management. They set fines for anyone in the village who cuts trees - or helps others to do so. Researchers and villagers also began investigating ways to increase agricultural production.

In 1996 however, the cash-strapped Government of Cambodia had granted a palm oil company a concession of 20 000 hectares - right in the middle of the Highlanders' land. Local people were not consulted. By 1998, over the objections of the community, intensive logging was taking place in the commune - and the spirit forests were not to be spared.

John Ashish, a local researcher with the project, describes a confrontation between a villager and a logger: "One villager had chosen a tree from the forest and marked it to claim it. He was going to use this tree to build his house. When the loggers came in, he stood by his tree and tried to stop them from cutting it. He said, "This is my tree. I marked it to build my house." The logger replied: "We don't want to hear from you. You are nothing." The tree was cut down."

Yet the villagers were mobilised by the project - and they had research results to make their case. They had also established a relationship with the provincial government, because the project was implemented in close cooperation with the Department of the Environment.

At a provincial workshop in 1999, villagers explained their land use map and illustrated how they depended on the forest. Governor Kham Kheun was impressed: "The government does not have a clear land use plan. In Ratanakiri, we can see that the villagers have made the kind of plan we need, based on a classification of the types of soil in the forest."

"We want to help the community protect its natural resources," he added. Governor Kheun, who grew up in Ratanakiri, went to bat for the Highlanders with the national government. In July 2000, the palm oil concession was drastically reduced - to 5 000 hectares. At the same time, the Governor also endorsed Som Thom community forestry, effectively signing the forest to the community for management.

The provincial government now sees the CBNRM project as a model and wants to extend it into other areas. The Department of the Environment has already received several requests from other communities to participate. Moreover, because of the project, both OXFAM and the UNDP hired lawyers who worked with the project participants to help draft a new land law that reflects issues affecting Highlanders, such as indigenous people's communal rights. A Cambodian helped to lobby the case for Highlanders at a ministerial level, and with other non-governmental and international organisations. The bill was adopted by the Council of Ministers, and is now before the National Assembly. If it is approved, indigenous communities will have the legal right to possess and use public land to support their traditional livelihood practices. "Villagers are changing their way of thinking," says Sal Yutch, a village development chief. "We can see that the only way to safeguard our resources is to work together as a community."

On the following page you will find a "problem tree" exercise. Please follow these steps while answering the questions in the exercise:

1. Choose a project example that you know well and that has some of the same elements as the initiative in this experience.

 

2. Now starting at the top of the tree work your way through the questions to the roots.

 

3. While you are doing this consider that the top of the tree represents immediate but sometimes symptomatic issues, the trunk gets to core problems that are often within the grasp of the local community to respond to, the roots get at fundamental and often important social, cultural or economic questions - these are often only partially in the control of any community to respond to - e.g. gender relations, world trade regimes, environmental degradation.

 

 

THE PROBLEM TREE

The effects: the leaves and branches of the tree
The most immediate issues, concerns and problems.
What are the issues and problems that are of concern to people?
Why are they concerns?

For Ratanakiri, Cambodia For your initiative

 

The problem: the trunk of the tree

The core problems that need to be addressed.

What are the major problems?

Why they are the major problem?

For Ratanakiri, Cambodia

 

 

For your initiative

 

The causes: the roots of the tree

The main sources and reasons for the problems that need to be addressed.

Why do these problems exist?

For Ratanakiri, Cambodia

 

For your initiative

 

Is it ok to have an initiative that does not tackle the problems at all these levels?

 

Considering the Theme and Learning Objectives for this experience please list one or more lessons you think are important for your own work. Please list these on the chart in "Drawing Your Own Conclusions" p89.

SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS/CONTACTS

Lisa Waldick. Staking a Claim in Cambodia's Highlands. Reports: Science from the developing world. International Development Research Centre March 30 2001. http://www.idrc.ca/reports/read_article_english.cfm?article_num=910

Claire Thompson, Research Officer, CBNRM program initiative, International Development Research Centre (IDRC); PO Box 8500, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. cthompson@idrc.ca 613 236 6163 ext 2069

For further information contact: mag@idrc.ca or visit the IDRC website at http://www.idrc.ca


Previous PageTop Of PageNext Page