Previous Page Table of Contents Next Page


3 Physiological and technical issues


3.1 Bio-ecological requirements and growth

Most of the data of the bio-ecological requirements of teak in Central America comes from the experience of, and the studies done, in Costa Rica, and a little from Panama and El Salvador. Vásquez and Ugalde (1995) identified the following aspects in 14 sites located of the Guanacaste province, in the North Pacific region of Costa Rica,

Table 3 shows the increments in diameter, height, basal area and volume for high, middle and low productivity sites.

Table 3. Yields for Tectona grandis in Guanacaste, Costa Rica

Range

MAI-dbh (cm/year)

MAI-Height (m/year)

G (m2/ha)

MAI-G (m2/ha/year)

MAI-Volume (m3/ha/year)

High

2.0 or more

2.0 or more

20 or more

2.5 or more

18 or more

Middle

1.6-1.9

1.6-1.9

15.1-19.9

1.6-2.4

12.1-17.9

Low

1.5 or less

1.5 or less

15 or less

1.5 or less

12 or less

Source: Vásquez and Ugalde (1995)

Vallejos (1996), in the same zone that Vásquez and Ugalde (1995) studied, determined that calcium content (0 - 20 cm of depth) influences significantly the yield of teak. He found that 18 cmol/l and more are adequate for good teak development. When soil present lower quantities, it is recommended to correct it with lime applications. He also determined that water deficit influences negatively the development of teak.

In this study, a Site Index prediction model was developed:

Ln (SI) = Ln (Hdom) + 1.8253 * ((1/Age^0.5162) - (1/Base Age^0.5162))

Where:

Ln = the natural logarithm
SI = site index
Hdom = dominant height (meters)
Base age = 10 years

Furthermore, a model relates the SI to the soil calcium content (Ca) and water balance (DEFHID):

SI = (25.432112 - 2.695521 * DEFHID + 0.268667 * Ca)/0.794

Where:

DEFHID = the number of months with less of 100 mm of rainfall.
Ca = the content of calcium (cmol/liter)

Vallejos (1996) developed a five class production/yield index for that area. Table 4 displays the information. Table 5 summarizes the conditions for good teak growth in Costa Rica.

Table 4. Yield and production classes for Tectona grandis in Guanacaste, Costa Rica

Variable

Unit

Marginal

Low

Middle

High

Excellent

MAI-dbh

cm/year

1.90 or less

1.91 - 2.49

2.50 - 3.01

3.02 - 3.8

3.81 or more

MAI-H

m/year

1.63 or less

1.64 - 2.32

2.33 - 3.14

3.15 - 4.05

4.06 or more

MAI-G

m2/ha/year

0.97 or less

0.97 - 2.04

2.05 - 2.77

2.78 - 3.73

3.74 or more

MAI-Vol

m3/ha/year

3.20 or less

3.21 - 11.83

11.84 - 18.00

18.01 - 26.57

26.58 or more

Source: Vallejos (1996)
Vol = total volume with bark in m3

In Central America, teak has been planted in the dry forest zone as well as in the humid forest. Given the wide range of climatic, edaphic and topographic conditions in which it has been planted, there is enough experience to indicate the conditions under which it is more likely to obtain better growth and yields.

Ugalde (1997) indicates that, with the experience in Central America, the following aspects have to be considered:

Table 5. Bio-climatic considerations for planting teak in Costa Rica

Variable

Optimal conditions

Observations **

Temperature (°C)

25 - 28

25

Rainfall (mm)

889 - 3 689

2 500

Rainfall Distribution

At least 3 dry months


Elevation

0 - 600

Up to 800

Soil

Deep with high fertility



Texture

Light

Heavy/drainage


Compaction*

Absent

Can be managed


Fertility *

High

High calcium content, neutral pH, low in aluminum

Topography

Flat (to) undulated



Slope *

Under 20%



Drainage *

Good

Superficial/Internal

Holdridge’s Life Zones

Tropical Humid Forest Tropical Dry Forest

Under 800 m above sea level

Winds *

Absent

Limiting

Source: Picado (1997)

*Limiting condition or variable. **Detailed values or specifications.

The MADELEÑA Project established sample plots in all countries. The results are summarized below (Ugalde 1997):

Range

MAI-dbh
(cm/year)

MAI-Height
(m/year)

High

2.5 or more

2.5 or more

Middle

1.51-2.5

1.51-2.5

Low

1.5 or less

1.5 or less

Range

MAI-dbh
(cm/year)

MAI-Height
(m/year)

Excellent

na

2.5 or more

High

na

1.6-2.5

Middle

na

1.1-1.5

Low

na

1.0 or less

na = not available

Range

MAI-dbh
(cm/year)

MAI-Height
(m/year)

High

na

2.0 or more

Middle

na

1.0-2.1

Low

na

1.0 or less

na = not available

Range

MAI-dbh
(cm/year)

MAI-Height
(m/year)

Excellent

3.1 or more

3.1 or more

High

2.1-3.0

2.1-3.0

Middle

1.1-2.0

1.1-2.0

Low

1.0 or less

1.0 or less

Flora y Fauna S.A. reported volume MAI increments between 9.3 and 22.9 m3/ha/year in plantations located in the North Zone of Costa Rica (Table 6). The Flora y Fauna Company has a set of production tables for the different sites of their plantations.

Table 6. Summary of four production scenarios (total and commercial volume) established for Flor y Fauna S. A. (plantation for a 20-year rotation). San Carlos, Costa Rica

Class site

Project

Trees
(n/ha)

Diameter
(cm)

Height
(m)

MAI of Total volume
(m3/ha)

MAI of Commercial Volume
(m3/ha)

Low

Teakwood I

240

28.6

20.2

13.4

9.3

Medium

Teakwood III

240

31.8

22.5

19.8

14.2

High

Teakwood VIa

240

34.5

25.3

25.3

18.5

Maximum

Teakwood VIb

240

37.2

27.3

31.4

22.9

Source: Camacho (1998)

Annual increments in diameter, height and volume in Bosques de Puerto Carrillo were obtained from permanent sample plots. The project information is presented in Appendix 5. Some average parameters obtained from the permanent sample plots are summarized in Table 7.

Table 7. Technical information from Permanent Sample Plots (PSP) of Bosques de Puerto Carrillo’s teak plantations. July, 1998

Age
(years)

Total Height Hmed
(m)

Average Diameter Dg
(cm)

Number Trees N
(trees/ha)

Standing Volume Vtot
(m3/ha)

Commercial Volume V10
(m3/ha)

Mean Annual Increment MAI Vtot
(m3/ha/year)

Mean Annual Increment MAI V10
(m3/ha/year)

3

10.5

10.4

1 111

n.s.

n.s.

n.s.

n.s.

4

12.6

12.7

660

55.2

19.5

23.3

8.2

5

14.2

14.5

660

69.1

34.1

21.4

9.5

6

15.6

16.0

660

83.7

49.6

20.2

10.5

7

16.7

17.3

660

98.3

65.1

19.4

11.2

8

17.6

18.4

440

74.8

53.2

18.8

11.6

9

18.5

19.3

440

83.9

62.8

17.7

11.4

10

19.3

20.2

440

93.4

72.9

16.9

11.3

11

20.0

21.0

440

102.5

82.6

16.2

11.1

12

20.6

21.7

220

55.5

45.8

15.5

11.0

Source: Quirós (1998).

n.s. = non-significant

Vtot = Standing volume according to Keogh's formula (1980), Vtot = 0.0359 + 0.000022 Dg2 * Hmed * N;

V 10 = Useful volume up to a minimum diameter of 10 cm without bark.

Table 8. Expected teak growth and yield per hectare in a high quality site with minimal management in Costa Rica

Age
(years)

Trees
(n/ha)

Harvested trees
(n/ha)

Diameter
(cm)

Commercial
Height a (m)

Commercial
Volume
(m3/hab)

1

1 300





4

700

600

12.0



8

400

200

20.8

11.0

48.59

15

200

200

31.3

14.0

140.04

20

---

200

37.3

14.0

198.87

Total gross volume




387.50

Source: Picado (1997)

a: Commercial height up to a diameter of 10 cm with bark;

b: Gross commercial volume = (dbh/100)2 * 0.7854 * Commercial Height *ff; where: ff = estimated form factor of 0.65.

Picado (1997) proposed a plantation management structure and possible yields to be obtained in Costa Rica. According to his projections, after 20 years, the MAI commercial volume will be 19.4 m3/ha/year (Table 8). Therefore, the structure can be considered representative of the average teak production conditions in the country.

Zambrana (1998) reported preliminary data for young plantations from El Salvador, 214 m3/ha of commercial log volume (8 cm top diameter) for 25 rotation age. Table 9 shows the proposed thinning plan and commercial volume yields.

Table 9. Preliminary yields estimates for teak in El Salvador

Parameters after thinning

Thinning

Total

Age (years)

No. of (trees/ha)

Aver. Height (m)

Dbh (cm)

Basal Area (m2/ha)

Vol. (m3/ha)

No. of trees/ha

Average Dbh (cm)

Vol (m3/ha) diameter >8 cm

Basal Area (m2/ha)

Vol (m3/ha) >8 cm

0

2200

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

4

1000

8

10

8

13

1200

6

9

11

22

10

500

15

17

12

50

500

14

30

23

89

17

300

18

24

13

85

200

20

35

33

159

25

190

20

30

14

100

190

27

40

40

214

Source: Zambrana (1998)

3.2 Plantation management system

To produce timber for sawmills, Picado (1997) recommends planting 1,000 - 1,600 trees/ha. In Costa Rica, in a high quality site, the first thinning must be performed between the third and fourth year. About 40 -50% of the total tree number has to be removed. Generally, this thinning does not yield any commercial timber, but it is necessary to eliminate competing, malformed, sick or damaged trees.

Until now, Costa Rica’s teak plantations management has been "poor and inadequate". Poor because the owners do not wish "to lose" 400 to 500 trees, that represented an investment during first three to four years, and inadequate because they don’t have enough technical knowledge. The result damages the plantation productive potential, reduces the size of the logs and limits the timber supply of better quality logs in the short term.

Martínez et al (1994) indicate that 62 % of the forest plantations of small and medium size farmers, with economic support from the State and technical direction from organizations of forest producers, showed management problems (lack of pruning and thinning).

Table 10 presents examples of estimated teak rotation, based on diameter increments values of 1.5 and 2 cm/year. For a 20 years rotation, average diameter at the final cut will be 30 - 40 cm. For a 25 years rotation, average diameter will vary between 37.5 and 50.0 cm. However, it is important to clarify that it is tantamount a good site selection and timely management to reach the maximum productive potential of the site.

When the diameter increment is equal or bigger than 2 cm/year, the convenient rotation is 20 years, with trees of an average of 40 cm (dbh). Financial analysis shows that rotations of more than 25 years presented IRRs lower than 12%.

Table 10. Estimated rotation age for teak plantations in Central America

Project

Country

Rotation (years)

Bosques de Puerto Carrillo 1

Costa Rica

25

MACORI 2

Costa Rica

25

Flor y Fauna 3

Costa Rica

20

General 4

Guatemala

20

General 5

Panama

20

General 6

El Salvador

25

Source: 1 Quirós (1998), 2 Víquez (1998), 3 Camacho (1998), 4 Becker (1998), 5 Morán (1998) and 6 Zambrana (1998), June, 1998.

The University of Wageningen is developing yield tables for three productivity index in the Dry Pacific and Atlantic Zone of Costa Rica (de Vriend 1998, unpublished thesis).


Previous Page Top of Page Next Page