Total Quality Score is to apply only in the case sorting of chestnuts
is done not only for decay but even for external appearance as explained in
the footnote of the table; even taste sorting depends on the ability of the
packinghouse manager to judge the raw flavour of chestnut when they arrive or
when they leave the storage. It is in these both stages that TQS is important
to code the sample.
The following step are required:
This operation requires longer time but it is very worthy for the discrimination of the farmer and to push them to provide better quality.
Size
|
Appearance
|
Taste
|
Total
Quality Score (TQS) |
Small (1) | acceptable (1) | flat (1) |
1
|
good(2) |
2
|
||
very good(3) |
3
|
||
fancy (3) | flat (1) |
3
|
|
good(2) |
6
|
||
very good(3) |
9
|
||
Medium (3) | acceptable (1) | flat (1) |
3
|
good(2) |
6
|
||
very good(3) |
9
|
||
fancy (3) | flat (1 |
9
|
|
good(2) |
18
|
||
very good(3) |
27
|
||
Big (10) | acceptable (1) | flat (1) |
10
|
good(2) |
20
|
||
very good(3) |
30
|
||
fancy (3) | flat (1 |
30
|
|
good(2) |
60
|
||
very good(3) |
90
|
Appearance: fancy = intense and uniform color, free of defects, tuft presence
acceptable = not uniform or less intense color or some defect or absence of tuft
Storage performance: if it is known that chestnut coming from a grower or from a field behave positively in the storage multiply the TQS by 2.