Ongoing activities and possible collaborative actons
Activity, aim and opportunity for collaboration; reference and contact |
Agro-ecological zone; farming system |
Problem to be addressed; actors |
Available tools; applicability |
Expected products and tools; timing |
Results: capacity building, mainstreaming |
CUBA |
|||||
INCA-Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Agrícolas 1. Biofertilization: inoculation with mycorrhizae (AMF) Possible collaboration: |
Caribbean region, C. & S. America, and Africa. |
Lack of fertilization, degraded soils, |
|
Increase yields, improve soil fertility, save inputs. |
Training farmers and technicians in use of inoculants. |
Urban agriculture |
Tropical regions. |
Loss of biodiversity, low production. |
|
2. Enhanced peri-urban production; enhanced biodiversity. |
Training farmers and researchers. |
Integrated animal-crop production with agro-ecological management
methods. |
Mixed crop-animal farms (1-5 ha). |
Loss of biodiversity, low production. |
|
|
Training farmers and researchers. |
ECUADOR |
|||||
CAMAREN Network (Sistema de Capacitación para el Manejo
de Recursos Naturales Renovables) Collaboration: |
Andean region. |
CAMAREN network has overlooked soil biology. Lack of farmer training
material. |
CAMAREN has material and experience on adult education, participatory
and gender approaches, and training material based on farmer experience. |
Raised awareness on soil biology and ecology. Incorporation of soil biology
in curriculum of CAMAREN. |
Workshop to explain soil biology and exchange information. |
INIAP- National Institute of Agricultural Research Gustavo Bernal |
Ecuadorian highlands (subsistence farming system). |
Soil erosion. |
Protocols available for research. Methods in extension and transfer of
technologies. |
Inoculant information (products) for farmers. |
Adoption of FFS approach. |
INIAP |
Inter-Andean region in Ecuador. |
Lack of information on soil biota. |
Background and knowledge of scientists on soil microbiology. |
Information for small farmers in highlands and students. |
To adapt microbiological processes in order to improve soil conditions. Improved research activities leading to improved soil conditions. |
BRAZIL |
|||||
EMBRAPA Pecuaria Sudeste |
Intensive cattle production systems in tropical grasslands. |
Impacts on soil, water and air. |
|
Preliminary new publications. |
Ongoing work. |
EMBRAPA Pecuaria Sudeste |
Tropical and watershed level. |
General to watershed- or landscape-scale problems. Researchers and farmers, based on case studies. |
Journals. |
Pictoral analysis of environmental problems available for research, extension and farmers. All groups of rural and urban society. |
Young, improving educational network. |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina. |
North of Paraná, Cerrados and Amazonian
regions. |
Land degradation, soil conservation, soil management,
identified by farmers and extensionists, (and students) through a crop
profile (French descriptive method for structures of cultivated
soils). |
Maximum data collected and analysed. Solutions for problems
found through discussion around a crop profile. |
Systemic vision: crop profile is a tool for gathering
information (also physical, chemical, biological & economic
analysis). |
For students: to build open minds more capable of considering
various aspects (physical, chemical, biological, social, cultural and
economic). |
EMBRAPA Soybean |
North of Paraná |
Loss of diversity of soil fauna and their contribution to
ecosystem function. |
Methodology available and applicable is established for soil macrofauna (TSBF-ASB and IBOY). |
Reduced use of external inputs and enhancement of soil functions. Database with indicative values and ranges of the biological indicators produced. Work to be performed during several seasons/years. Data available on the potential of different management systems to contribute to C sequestration. |
Monitoring of soil quality can be done by trained
farmers. |
EMBRAPA |
South of Brazil. |
Need of indicators of sustainability identified by farmers. |
Ongoing research by farmers and researchers. |
Maximum of 10 indicators for economic, environmental,
agronomic aspects. |
Farmers able to collect, analyse and take action based on
indicators. |
EMBRAPA Cerrados |
Brazilian savannahs (Cerrados region). |
Loss of soil quality. |
Use of microbiological and biochemical parameters as early indicators of changes in soil as result of different types of management systems. |
Simple and useful (meaningful) biological indicators that could be used by farmers. Methodologies are described, especially in the SSSA book on soil quality. |
To identify management systems able to keep the soil biologically active and productive, avoiding or reducing the need to convert new areas (native areas) into agricultural lands. |
Assessoria e Serviços a Projetos em Agricultura Alternativa (ASPAA) |
Centre-south Paraná State, Brazil. |
Rebuild soil productive capacity. |
Review on green manure species available for S. Brazil. Publication: Petersen, P., Tardin, J.M. and Martochi, F. 1999. Participatory development of no-tillage systems without herbicides for family farming: experience of C.S. Region of Paraná. Envt. Devt. and Sustainability 1: 235-252. |
Farmer-led experimental areas. |
Develop tillage systems based on cover crops, direct sowing
and no herbicide. |
EMBRAPA |
Hilly agroforestry area. |
C and N addition to the system. Soil protection, increase in quantity and quality of water. Problems of society in general. Principle known but need to identify legume species, rhizobial strains and management for specific ecological and cropping systems. |
Use of nodulated and mycorrhizal legume trees as a factor in land reclamation and sustainable agriculture. By farmers, extensionists and scientists. May be applied to any farm. Publications: Franco et al., 1992, 1998, etc. |
Integrated soil management. Genetic conservation. Sustainability. |
Build up awareness in society in general. |
EMBRAPA |
Drylands and hydrographic basins. |
Reclaim degraded areas and find a way to monitor their efficiency. |
Use of suitable bioindicators to guide solutions or monitor
efficiency. |
Reclaimed areas monitored by appropriate bioindicators. |
Share bioindicators efficiency with other communities, scientists, extensionists, etc. |
EMBRAPA |
Organic no-till and till systems |
Farmers who have their lands condemned by high incidence of
soil-borne plant disease. |
Quantification of soil pathogen inoculum. |
Control of soil-borne diseases by using soil management, cover crops and suitable rotations. |
Trained agronomists in extension services. |
TSBF-GEF Project 2002-07 |
Amazonia: different land use types by indigenous people. |
Decreased below-ground biodiversity with land use intensification. |
TSBF handbook of methods, TSBF Web site, integrated
multidisciplinary action. |
Standardized methodologies. |
Strengthened collaboration within and among seven countries. |
EMBRAPA-Soybean |
19 million ha in Brazil. |
Inoculants with rhizobial strains adapted to Brazilian
conditions have to be maintained and improved continuously. |
Methodology is established for inoculant production, quality
control and strain collection. |
Several publications available. |
No need for N-fertilizer application. |
EMBRAPA-Soybean |
Five different Brazilian ecosystems. |
Farmers started asking for biological parameters to evaluate
soil quality. |
Evaluation of microbiological parameters. |
Biological parameter kits for farmers. |
EMBRAPA-Soybean can include other groups and countries in the
study. |
URUGUAY |
|||||
Instituto Nacional de Investigacion Agricola (INIA), La Estanzuela, Colonia
Maria Stella Zerbino |
No-tillage system in Uruguay and S. America. |
Soil health and quality indicators, comparing tillage with
no-tillage for sustainability; bioindicators and relationships among beneficial
soil organisms; monitoring abundance and composition of soil macrofauna in
different no-tillage farming systems. |
Macrofauna composition and abundance explain soil quality and
health. |
A bioindicator that is useful and practical for farmers. |
Trained extensionists and farmers. |
FRANCE |
|||||
IBOY- IRD, Institut de Recherche et Developpement |
Brazil. |
Sustainability of agricultural systems regarding soil quality. |
A synthetic index of soil quality based on abundance and
diversity of macro-invertebrate communities. |
Protocol or manual for the application of the soil macrofauna
index and interpretation. |
Training for technicians and farmers. |
THE NETHERLANDS |
|||||
Wageningen University |
1. Benin and Ghana Cash crops: cotton, cacao Food crops:
cowpea Orphan crops: sorghum. |
1. Soil fertility depletion. Scientists through participatory
approach. |
1. Not yet identified. Different solutions are expected given
the different socio-economic and cultural conditions. Anthropology and sociology
studies for participatory problem identification. |
1. Not yet identified. Different products and tools are
expected through participatory approach, given the different socio-economic and
socio-cultural conditions. Method developed by Paul Richards, Wageningen
University, The Netherlands. |
1. Institutions strengthened. Government agencies, market
stakeholders & NGOs. |
AUSTRALIA |
|||||
CSIRO - Land and Water Davies Laboratory, Queensland |
Subtropical. |
Yield decline due to continuous monocropping, tillage, burning
of residues, compaction, & poor root health. |
New farming options for cane growers within next
systems. |
Raising awareness about soil health; also useful to other similar situations of highly mechanized agriculture. |
Research papers ([email protected]) |
ISRAEL |
|||||
Bar-Ilan University Biology Dept, |
Arid and semiarid ecosystems in the Mediterranean. |
Overgrazed desertified systems, nutrient cycling. |
Methodology adapted to desert ecosystems. |
|
|
INDIA |
|||||
School of Life Sciences, Sambalpur University, Bikram K. Senapati |
Tropical and temperate. |
Soil conservation. |
A biofertilizer patent was deposited (PCT/FR97/01363) on
behalf of all three parties. Being transferred to nine areas in China. |
This project has been evaluated in benefit-cost analysis at international verification by multidisciplinary groups. |
FAO Soil Biodiversity Portal (http://www.fao.org/agl/agll/soilbiod/default.htm) |
Jawaharlal Nehru University |
N.E. India; Central Himalayas; Western Ghats. |
Sustainable agriculture. |
Developed indigenously through adaptive methodology development. |
Sustainable agriculture and livelihoods. |
More than 350 research papers by the author, 14 research volumes, audiovisual material. |
CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana Dr. A. P. Gupta |
Indo-Gangetic plain. |
Low or no profits from uneconomical and ecologically unsafe cropping systems due to intensive use of chemical fertilizers and pesticides. Farmers. |
Suitable low-cost machinery with ability to sow crops in low or no-till systems. |
Technology of using manually harvested rice-straw (with or without ex situ composting) as surface mulch - a technology for cash-poor farmers. Biological management of soils is enhanced. |
Technology is available with different researchers. |
ICRISAT, Patancheru |
Semi-arid lands of S. & S.E. Asia. |
Researchers, extensionists and policy-makers. |
Use of herbal extracts and microbial pesticides to protect
crops. |
Biopesticides of commercial value intended to be available for
wider use in 5 years. |
Expected research products need to be combined with
traditional knowledge. |
BHUTAN |
|||||
National Soil Service Centre |
Low-input traditional farming system. |
Land degradation: organic matter depletion, decrease of soil
biodiversity. |
Field-based bioindicators for visual assessment by farmers: measuring kits for solid respiration, pH, organic matter, total C, total N. |
Contribution and cooperation with international and national initiatives related to biodiversity indicators. |
|
BURKINA FASO and SENEGAL |
|||||
Institut pour lEnvironnement et la Recherche Agricole (INERA) |
Sahelian and savannah region. |
Production loss, soil degradation, biodiversity
loss. |
|
Soil management technologies and principles; already available and improved in 2004. |
Training of farmers, training of masters and Ph.D. students. |
Institut pour lEnvironnement et la Recherche Agricole (INERA) |
Agro-pastoral and sylvo-pastoral systems. |
Lack of knowledge. |
|
|
Ph.D. training, scientist training during short visits. |
SOUTHERN AND EASTERN AFRICA |
|||||
1. SEARCA Research, Natal Agricultural Department |
S. & E. Africa. |
Production and preservation of surface mulches. |
|
System to reduce soil water loss. |
Enhanced adoption by farmers of conservation tillage. |
2. African Conservation Tillage Network (ACT) |
S. & E. Africa. |
Dissemination of conservation agricultural
technologies. |
|
Adoption of conservation tillage systems. In 2-3 years (2004-05). |
Enhanced adoption by farmers of conservation tillage. |
3. FAO/COSPE/ARC |
Small-scale communal system. |
Conservation of natural resources. |
|
In 5 years (2007). |
Extensionists empowered. Understanding of soil biological processes enhanced. |
University of Cape Town, |
Small- and large-scale farming systems as well as natural ecosystems. |
N and P nutrition in cropping systems. |
Routine methods used in University of Cape Town and
colleagues laboratories. |
Identification of high-N2-fixing grain legumes
resistant to insect pests. |
Shared experience between University of Cape Town and
farmers. |
EAST AFRICA |
1. Organic farming systems (subsistence). |
1. Infertile and highly degraded soils (low crop
productivity). |
1. Rhizobia inoculants technology. Availability of
bioproducts. |
Appropriate education materials for various groups. |
Training farmers, extensionists and scientists on benefits of soil micro-organisms, e.g. rhizobia inoculants, mycorrhiza and vermicomposting. Strong collaborative links established among stakeholders. Institutional strengthening. |