Previous Page Table of Contents Next Page


APPENDIX I: SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS


RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING REGIONAL OR SUBREGIONAL ASPECTS

1. The Ad hoc Working Group has been very useful to promote sustainable lobster utilization at a national and regional level. It is recommended that FAO and national authorities continue supporting the Working Group's operation.

2. Cooperation is vital among countries for adequate resource management. (Mexico)

3. The Working Group could be useful in contributing to promote the acceptance of member countries for the application of international standards in their lobster fisheries. Decisions taken within the Working Group could receive greater support from decision makers than recommendations provided only by national institutions.

4. It was considered correct the methodology of providing technical support at national level, complemented with these meetings, in which are presented technical recommendations to decision makers in an immediate manner.

5. A greater sense of national ownership of the Working Group was promoted, by which the election of a Chair was carried out among participating countries and was proposed the appointment of two national focal points for each country.

6. The purpose of the Working Group has been to facilitate the integration of monitoring, review and implementation of an effective management for lobster fishery. It is essential that the Working Group be accepted as a national activity and not as something external to the countries' responsibilities and budget.

7. Countries must consider the establishment of national working groups linked to the Regional Working Group, to gain from the experience of individuals and institutions, which can contribute, with lobster stock management.

8. It was expressed concern because the Working Group was not giving enough attention to countries with scanty production, the meeting agreed that it was a problem due to limited budget and it was suggested the interaction with other regional agencies to facilitate the participation of these countries.

9. To establish the validity of the hypothesis on lobster shared stocks. (Venezuela)

10. Explore ways of conducting regional management. (Dominican Republic and Mexico)

11. Scientific support currently provided by FAO through the Working Group of the WECAFC, should be provided more extensively during the interim period between meetings. This will allow a much larger contribution of the countries at the next meeting. (Brazil)

12. It is recommended to make an integrated regional analysis, which will include some environmental variables into fisheries assessment models. (Cuba)

13. To adapt lobster fishery management taking into consideration local conditions of abundance and environment. (Cuba)

14. Development of international agreements with the main spiny lobster importing nations to jointly eliminate the trade of undersized lobster. (Brazil)

15. Creation of a permanent discussion group through Internet, for which Colombia has offered to lead during its first stage, as well as to request FAO's partnership, which will allow to improve our efforts in consolidating scientific information. (Colombia)

16. More support for regional cooperation and research, e.g. in the current CARIFORUM Fisheries Project and the utilization regional funding to a larger extent and explore ways of conducting regional management.

17. There are opportunities for the improvement of lobster fisheries management through cooperation with international organizations (CFU, FAO, etc.) and bilateral collaboration with neighboring countries. (Dominican Republic)

18. Establishment of joint agreements among different countries from the region, considering that it is a shared resource. (Elimination of diving as a fishing method, joint close seasons, shared surveillance, type of traps not harmful to the environment, etc.) (Honduras)

19. It was recognized the importance of cooperation between neighboring countries at a subregional level. The subregional groups can jointly operate in a planned manner together with the Regional Working Group.

20. Develop better cooperation between Belize and its partners Cuba and Mexico and its neighbouring countries in order to promote better local and regional management of the spiny lobster resource. (Belize)

21. To review available information in order to reach an agreement between Colombia, Honduras and Nicaragua on a close season and minimum size at capture for the subregion. (Colombia)

22. To review available information in order to reach an agreement between Colombia, Honduras and Nicaragua on a joint close season, which is estimated could be set up between May and June, because in June a spawning peak period occurs in Colombia and these months are included in the close season implemented in Nicaragua and something similar occurs in Honduras, where there is a 4-month close season (1st April to 31st July). (Colombia)

23. In the same way, by reviewing available information from Colombia, Honduras and Nicaragua, data can be generated to determine a subregional minimum size at capture, it has been established a Ltail value of 145 mm in Honduras, 135 mm in Nicaragua and 140 mm in Colombia, which can give an average Ltail value of 140 mm. (Colombia)

24. Within the context of the existing working group and due to the socio-economic importance of the lobster fishery in some small island states of the Eastern Caribbean, FAO and CFU to provide technical and financial support to assist in the development of a subgroup comprising small islands states such as Saint Lucia, St. Vincent and the Grenadines and Grenada. (St. Lucia)

25. Develop and foster better cooperation between Belize, Cuba and Mexico and its neighbouring countries in order to promote better local and regional management of the spiny lobster resource. (Belize)

Table 1. Summary of size regulations and closed seasons in the region

Countries (South to North)

Subregional Group

Minimum lengths (mm)

Minimum weights (g)

Closed season

LCa)

Ltot

Ltail

Wtot

Wtail

Brasil

South (1)

75*


130



1 Jan.-30 April

Venezuela

1

120



900-1000


1 May-31 Oct.

Saint Lucia

4

95




340

1 May-31 Aug.

Colombia-San Andrés

South-Central (2)

(80.1)b)


140



None

Colombia-Guajira

2

(68.9)

210


385


None

Nicaragua

2

75

230

135


142

1 April-2 Junec)

Honduras

2

(80.1)


145


142

1 April-31 July

Dominican Republic

2

(80.5)

240

120d)



1 April-31 July

Jamaica

2

76.2





1 April-30 June

Belize/Belice

North-Central (3)

76.2


113


113

15 Feb.-14 June

Mexico

3

74.6

223

135



1 March-30 June

Turks and Caicos

3

83




142

1 April-31 July

Cuba (South)

3

69

210

150



10 Feb.-31 May

Cuba (North)

North (4)

69

210

150



10 Feb.-31 May

Florida (USA)

4

76





1 April-5 Aug.

Bahamas

4

82.5


139.7



1 April-31 July

Bermuda

4

92




340

1 April-31 Aug.

a) Carapace length.
b) Converted from another measurement.
c) Foreign vessels only.
d) Without telson.

NATIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS

Bahamas

Belize

Bermuda

Brazil

Colombia

Cuba

Dominican Republic

Honduras

Jamaica

Mexico

Nicaragua

Santa Lucia

Turks and Caicos

Venezuela


Previous Page Top of Page Next Page