Previous Page Table of Contents Next Page


Determinism of Fish Assemblage Structure in Neotropical Floodplain Lakes: Influence of Internal and Landscape Lake Conditions

Pouilly M.1 Rodríguez M.A.2

1 Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD) UMR CNRS 5023, Université Lyon 1 43, Bd du 11 Novembre 1918, F-69622 Villeurbanne Cedex - France E-mail: pouilly@univ-lyon1.fr

2 Département de Chimie-Biologie, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières C.P. 500, Trois-Rivières, Québec G9A 5H7 - Canada E-mail: marco_rodriguez@uqtr.ca

ABSTRACT

In the neotropics, seasonal flooding renders the floodplain an open system in which many fish species can disperse freely. Consequently, it has been suggested that fish assemblage structure in floodplain lakes is largely stochastic. However, recent studies concluded that fish assemblage structure could be determined mostly by local environmental factors. The present work tested 1) the predictability of fish assemblage structure in lakes of the Mamoré River floodplain, Bolivia, in relation to environmental conditions and 2) the general prediction that fish assemblages are structured following the piscivory-transparency-morphometry (PTM) model originally developed for the Orinoco River. Fish species abundances were quantified in eight lakes of the Mamoré River floodplain, positioned along a spatial gradient of distance to the main river, through five high- water and four low-water surveys. We found strong relationships between fish assemblage structure and abiotic variables. Spatial variation in fish assemblage structure was stronger than temporal variation. Consistent with predictions of the PTM model, relative abundances of siluriforms and gymnotiforms declined in clearer and deeper water, whereas relative abundances of characiforms and clupeiforms increased, as expected from knowledge on the sensory capabilities of these taxa. Partitioning of variation showed that although internal variables, especially transparency and water depth, play an important role in structuring fish assemblages, landscape variables, specifically temporal variability of water quality and connectivity, also influenced assemblage structure. These results support the notion of hierarchical control of assemblage structure. Landscape variables seem to operate as a primary filter that differentially limits local movement and migration as a function of lake connectivity. A secondary filter reflecting internal processes appears to exert stronger control in well-connected lakes where the migration filter might be weak. At the ordinal level, the distribution of clupeids, gymnotiforms and siluriforms appeared to be shaped by both landscape and internal variables. In contrast, that of characiforms did not seem limited by landscape variables.

INTRODUCTION

The structure of fish assemblages is influenced by environmental variations at multiple spatial and temporal scales. Assemblage patterns should therefore be evaluated with respect to the relative contribution of small-scale, local and larger-scale, regional, ecological processes (Angermeier and Winston 1998). Specifically, environmental influences acting at different scales can be viewed as hierarchical filters that control species presence or abundance (Tonn et al. 1990). Species should be influenced differentially as a function of their adaptations to abiotic and biotic selective forces. Abiotic conditions may be influential at all spatial scales, although biotic interactions are likely to operate only at the local scale (Tonn et al. 1990; Keddy 1992). Patterns of control in fish assemblages differ among systems. For example, in Mediterranean streams, variation in fish assemblage structure is mostly explained by large-scale factors (stream size and catchment position) rather than by microhabitat and biotic interactions (Magalhães, Batalha and Collares- Pereira 2002). In small temperate lakes, piscivory and both local and larger-scale environmental variables (water depth, surface area, isolation) influence the structure of fish assemblages (Tonn et al. 1990). Finally, in neotropical floodplain lakes of the Orinoco River, the piscivory-transparency-morphometry model (PTM) proposed by Rodríguez and Lewis (1997) indicates that species distribution and abundance is tightly linked to lake water transparency, which is in turn controlled by lake morphometry. A similar pattern was found in the Araguaia River floodplain, Brazil (Tejerina-Garro, Fortin and Rodriguez 1998).

In most neotropical floodplains, the annual flood cycle of the river is predictable and exhibits marked seasonal fluctuations in water level that constitute one of the main ecological characteristics of floodplain waterbodies (Junk, Bayley and Sparks 1989). Floodplain lakes are mainly isolated during the dry season, but during the wet season, lake interconnections and forest flooding give fish access to a broad range of habitats. Consequently, the alternation of dry and wet seasons produces major change in patterns of fish abundance and distribution (Lowe-McConnell 1975; Rodríguez and Lewis 1994).

At the floodplain scale, environmental conditions at any given moment and seasonal change in those conditions are spatially heterogeneous. Young oxbow lakes are located near the river channel and retain a channel-like morphology. Over many years, floodplain lakes undergo morphological change and become shallower as a consequence of sediment deposition, colonization by vegetation and flooding attenuation (Amoros et al. 1987). This dynamic physical process is accentuated as the main channel moves away from the lake. Thus, one could expect orderly changes in fish assemblage structure along an age or distance gradient to the main river channel, a relationship driven by changes in lake morphometry, intensity of the flood effect and degree of connection with the main river channel along the gradient. However, Rodríguez and Lewis (1997) and Tejerina-Garro et al. (1998) found no influence of landscape variables on structure of fish assemblages and concluded that assemblage structure was determined mostly by internal variables operating locally.

We conducted, over a two-year period, a survey of the structure of fish assemblages in eight lakes of the Mamoré River floodplain, Bolivia, that were positioned along a sharp spatial gradient of landscape conditions. The present work tested: 1) the predictability of fish assemblage structure in the Mamoré River floodplain in relation to both internal descriptors and lake-type categories reflecting landscape conditions and 2) the general prediction that fish assemblages are structured following the PTM model originally developed for the Orinoco River floodplain (Rodríguez and Lewis 1997).

Figure 1. Location of the eight study lakes in the central Mamore River floodplain near Trinidad, Bolivia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

STUDY AREA

The Mamoré River is one of the main tributaries of the Madeira River, a major affluent of the Amazon (Figure 1). The Mamoré River drains the southern Bolivian Andes and a vast savannah plain broken by forest gallery. Local climatic conditions are marked by the alternation of a wet (October - March) and a dry season (April - September). A large annual flood, potentially extending over ca. 150 000 km2 (Denevan 1980), generally occurs at the end of the wet season (December - April) and can last as long as three or four months (Loubens, Lauzanne and Le Guennec 1992).

Table 1: Environmental characteristics (landscape and internal variables) of eight lakes of the Mamoré floodplain. Means (ranges) of internal variables are given for the dry and wet seasons.


Season

Coitarama

Suarez

Florida

Potrero

Siquero

Verdun 2

Tiuco

Verdun 1

Supra-lake variables










Lake-type/Position


Savannah

Savannah

Edge

Edge

Forest

Forest

Mamoré

Mamoré

Estimated age (year)


>100

>100

>100

>100

>20

>20

<20

<20

Distance Mamoré (km)


5

6

4.5

4

1.3

1.2

0.1

0.15





temporary/

temporary/

temporary/

temporary/

permanent

permanent

Connectivity


isolated

isolated

forest

channel

channel

channel



Lake Perimeter


8.08

10.99

4.11

3.4

6.13

4.06

9.94

8.81

Lake area


3.43

4.2

0.28

0.39

0.67

0.37

1.19

1.01

Lake shape


1.23

1.51

2.2

1.55

2.11

1.88

2.57

2.48

Temporal variation (CVPCA)


-1.35

-0.84

1.5

1.53

-0.35

0.64

-0.61

-0.11

Whole-lake variables










Temperature (°C)

Dry

27.7

28.8

25.9

25.9

29.1

27.7

27.7

28.4



(26.7-29.3)

(26.8-32.9)

(20.3-31.6)

(19.4-32)

(28.8-29.4)

(26.7-28.6)

(24.6-29.6)

(26.8-30.3)


Wet

28.4

28

27.6

27.2

28.3

27.7

28.7

28.5



(24.4-31.1)

(24.1-30.5)

(26.4-28.7)

(23.1-30.6)

(25.7-30.2)

(27.4-28.3)

(26.8-32)

(28.1-29.2)

Water depth (m)

Dry

1.5

1.2

0.7

0.6

4.4

0.9

8.7

4.9



(1.5-1.5)

(1.1-1.3)

(0.6-0.8)

(0.4-1)

(2.3-6.4)

(0.7-1.2)

(6.1-11.6)

(3.4-6.5)


Wet

1.7

1.4

2.4

1.5

6.4

5.6

11.9

10.5



(1.6-1.8)

(1.3-1.5)

(0.6-4.6)

(0.5-3.7)

(3.5-8.5)

(3.6-8.1)

(9.2-17)

(9.5-11.7)

Secchi transparency (cm)

Dry

36

13.8

8.3

12.5

19.1

19.3

77.6

33.2



(27.3-43.3)

(10-23.3)

(8.3-8.3)

(5-29)

(9.7-25)

(14.7-24)

(48.7-139)

(22.7-48.3)


Wet

42.2

38.5

40.6

29.1

45.4

64.6

73.2

63.8



(35.7-51.3)

(31-49)

(13.3-68)

(8.7-76)

(31-60)

(46.7-80)

(41.3-106)

(27-85)

pH

Dry

6.8

6.9

5.5

6

6.9

6.6

7.8

7.2



(6.6-7)

(6.7-7.4)

(5.4-5.5)

(5.7-6.5)

(6.8-7)

(6.1-7.2)

(7.2-8.7)

(6.9-7.7)


Wet

6.5

6.6

6.5

6.1

6.4

6.5

7.1

6.7



(6.4-6.7)

(6.3-6.8)

(6.3-6.7)

(5.5-6.8)

(5.9-6.7)

(6.4-6.6)

(6.8-7.5)

(6.4-7.1)

Conductivity (micros/s)

Dry

17

20

90

49

86

74

228

150



(16-19)

(16-24)

(73-107)

(39-55)

(66-97)

(42-105)

(160-277)

(103-237)


Wet

16

19

65

36

43

70

139

97



(15-18)

(14-26)

(56-76)

(27-60)

(30-76)

(51-91)

(85-158)

(73-113)

The study area is situated in the central part of the Mamoré River floodplain (14°30’ - 14°52’S; 64°51’- 65°01’W) near the city of Trinidad. Eight lakes were studied that correspond to four different ecological lake-types (Figure 1, Table 1): six are oxbow lakes situated in the forest gallery at varying distances from the Mamoré River; the remaining two are savannah lakes:

Lakes close to the river may be subject to flooding by whitewater drained by the Mamoré River (Loubens et al. 1992; Ibañez 2000) and are largely influenced by annual water level fluctuations. Local rainwater feeds lakes remote from the river, the savannah and edge lake types, which therefore have characteristics, intermediate between white and blackwaters.

FISH SAMPLING AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEASUREMENTS

Fish were sampled using thirteen gillnets with a wide range of mesh sizes (25 m long by 2 m high; mesh sizes: 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90 and 110 mm). Sampling was conducted during five periods of wet season (March 1998, March 1999, May 1999, March 2000, May 2000) and four periods of dry season (July 1998, October 1998, September 1999, December 1999). For each sampling (lake-period combination), gillnets were left in place for two hours in the evening (17:00-19:00) and two hours in the morning (5:00-7:00). Gillnets were placed perpendicular to the shore at approximately the same locations throughout the study.

Captured fishes were fixed in buffered formaldehyde (4 percent) and later preserved in buffered ethanol (75 percent). In the laboratory, fish were identified to species, or only to genus when taxonomic knowledge was inadequate for reliable specific identification, by reference to voucher specimens left by a previous taxonomic research project (Lauzanne and Loubens 1985; Lauzanne, Loubens and Le Guennec 1991) at the Trinidad fish collection (CIRAUTB), the Museo Nacional de Historia Natural, La Paz and the Musée National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris.

Environmental variables were assigned to two categories. Eight variables characterizing lake internal conditions in individual lakes: temperature, water depth, transparency, conductivity, pH, lake area, perimeter and shape (calculated as Perimeter/(4pArea)0.5). Three variables correspond to landscape conditions (features external to the lake) that may influence internal biotic and abiotic processes and that are related to the position of the lake in the floodplain: connection type, distance to the main river channel and temporal variability of water quality. On each sampling occasion, five internal variables: temperature, water depth, transparency (Secchi disk), conductivity (electronic conductimeter WTW model LF31) and pH (colorimetric pH meter HACH), were measured at three points (referenced by GPS) in the deepest area of the lake. Temporal variability of water quality was quantified by means of coefficients of variation (CV) of the five landscape variables. Lake scores on the first axis of a PCA on the covariance matrix of the five CVs were used as an overall measure of temporal variation (CVPCA). Lake area, shape, perimeter and distance to the main channel were estimated from a photographic image (ERS satellite; pixel resolution 12.6 m).

STATISTICAL ANALYSES

Species represented by <5 individuals and <3 occurrences were excluded from the analysis (103 species were conserved of a total of 140). Given that fishing effort was constant, catch per unit effort (CPUE) was calculated for each species and sampling occasion as the total number of individuals captured in all gillnets. Transformations were performed as required to better conform to statistical assumptions. CPUE data were transformed as ln (X+1) or, for proportions, as arcsin (p0.5). The environmental variables Secchi transparency, water depth and conductivity were log-transformed.

Multivariate relationships between assemblage structure and environmental variables were quantified by canonical correspondence analysis (CCA), (Ter Braak 1986); (programme CANOCO, version 4), a direct ordination technique based on chi-square distances for the species data. Inclusion of predictor variables was based on a forward selection procedure with cutoff p value = 0.05. Statistical significance of species-environment relationships in the CCA was obtained by means of Monte Carlo tests implemented in CANOCO (1 000 permutations).

The variation-partitioning method of Borcard, Legendre and Drapeau (1992) was used to determine the fraction of the variation in the species matrix that could be explained by the landscape variables (pure “spatial” effect), the internal variables (pure “environmental” effect) and a “shared” effect of landscape and internal variables (variation explained jointly by spatial and environmental variables), as well as the fraction of variation not explained by these three components (“unexplained”). The variation is partitioned by dividing the inertia (sum of all eigenvalues) of constrained (partial) CCAs of the species matrix by the total inertia of a correspondence analysis of the species matrix (Borcard et al. 1992).

Partitioning of variation was also used to examine further the pure “spatial” component. First, the effect of the significant environmental variables was partialled out, leaving only the “pure” spatial variation and the unexplained variation. Then, forward selection was used to determine which landscape variables contributed significantly to explaining the “pure” spatial variation.

Figure 2. Boxplot of internal variables (pH, temperature, conductivity, water depth, Secchi transparency), by lake type. Lake types are ordered along the horizontal axis according to their distance to the Mamore River channel.

As a test of the general prediction of the PTM model, scatterplots were used to depict the relationships between relative abundance of major taxa (CPUE proportion; arcsine transformed) and transparency (Rodríguez and Lewis 1997).

RESULTS

TEMPORAL AND SPATIAL VARIATION OF LAKE INTERNAL CONDITIONS

Variation in water depth, Secchi transparency and conductivity showed clear temporal and spatial structure (Figure 2, Table 1). Savannah lakes, showed very limited variation in water depth both within and between wet and dry periods (range _ 20 cm); for the other (oxbow) lakes, environmental variation generally increased with distance to the river (Figure 2). Depth of oxbow lakes also diminished with increasing distance to the river, reflecting the temporal evolution of lake morphology along a gradient ranging from recently abandoned river channel to total dry-out.

Temporal variability of Secchi transparency and conductivity showed spatial patterns similar to that for water depth, as did the composite measure of temporal variability based on five environmental variables (CVPCA, Table 1). The six oxbow lakes were generally deeper, clearer and had lower conductivity during the wet season than during the dry season, contrasting with savannah lakes, which showed more limited seasonal variation (Table 1). pH, conductivity, Secchi transparency and water depth generally decreased systematically with the increasing distance to the river; however, the savannah lakes, although further from the river than oxbow lakes, had high pH and Secchi transparency relative to their distance from the river.

FISH ASSEMBLAGE STRUCTURE

A total of 38 292 fish, distributed among 140 species, were caught (Table 2). The 103 species selected for quantitative analysis represented more than 99.8 percent of the total number of individuals. A few very abundant species accounted for more than half of the catch: the small tetra Moenkhausia dichroura (30.7 percent), the armored catfish Hypoptopoma joberti (9.5 percent), the curimatid Potamorhina latior (5.4 percent), the characid “sardines” Triportheus angulatus and T. albus (respectively 4.8 percent and 3.5 percent) and an unidentified species of anchovy, Engraulidae sp. (4.5 percent). Seventeen species had abundances exceeding 1 percent of the total catch (Table 2).

Table 2: List of 140 fish species captured in eight lakes of the Mamoré floodplain. Occurrence, total number of individuals captured, and relative abundance are given for each species, by lake type.

Order, Family
Species, Authority


Relative Abundance (%)of analysed species

pisci.

Total catch number

occurrence
(n=57)

Savannah
(2 lakes, n=15)

Edge
2 lakes, n=14)

Forest
(2 lakes, n=13)

Mamoré
(2 lakes, n=15)

Beloniformes








Belonidae








Potamorrhaphis cf. eigenmanni
Miranda-Ribeiro, 1915


3

3

- -

- -

- -

- -

Characiformes




88.61

64.53

39.48

59.04

Acestrorhynchidae








Acestrorhynchus spp.

p

387

26

1.93

0.29

0.19

0.35

Anostomidae








Leporinus friderici friderici
(Bloch, 1794)


86

24

0.30

0.16

0.14

0.19

Leporinus trifasciatus
Steindachner, 1876


1

1

- -

- -

- -

- -

Rhytiodus microlepis
Kner, 1858


107

13

0.04

1.10

0.31

0.37

Schizodon fasciatus
Spix & Agassiz, 1829


154

33

0.48

0.68

0.11

0.46

Characidae








Agoniates cf. anchovia
Eigenmann, 1914

p

9

3

0.00

0.00

0.01

0.10

Aphyocharax anisitsi
Eigenmann & Kennedy, 1903


338

3

0.02

8.78

0.00

0.00

Brycon cf. cephalus
(Günther, 1869)


3

2

- -

- -

- -

- -

Charax gibbosus
(Linnaeus, 1758)

p

19

11

0.03

0.26

0.02

0.03

Roeboides affinis
(Günther, 1868)

p

968

42

4.00

2.07

0.49

2.00

Roeboides biserialis
(Garman, 1890)

p

11

3

0.00

0.16

0.00

0.06

Roeboides myersii
Gill, 1870

p

277

31

0.76

1.02

0.65

0.59

Piabucus melanostomus
Holmberg, 1891


3

1

- -

- -

- -

- -

Astyanax abramis
(Jenyns, 1842)


2

2

- -

- -

- -

- -

Astyanax bimaculatus
(Linnaeus, 1758)


48

10

0.19

0.42

0.00

0.00

Ctenobrycon spilurus
(Valenciennes, 1850)


183

19

0.13

3.48

0.23

0.06

Gymnocorymbus ternetzi (Boulenger, 1895)


2

2

- -

- -

- -

- -

Hemigrammus sp.


4

1

- -

- -

- -

- -

Markiana nigripinnis
(Perugia, 1891)


35

10

0.17

0.05

0.03

0.00

Moenkhausia dichroura
(Kner, 1858)


11748

43

61.26

12.47

4.74

3.80

Parecbasis cyclolepis
Eigenmann, 1914


431

17

0.00

1.41

2.19

2.19

Phenacogaster sp.


4

2

- -

- -

- -

- -

Triportheus albus
Cope, 1872


1336

35

0.29

0.92

2.19

13.46

Triportheus angulatus
(Spix & Agassiz, 1829)


1831

48

4.48

7.44

2.17

7.37

Triportheus culter
(Cope, 1872)


3

1

- -

- -

- -

- -

Triportheus sp.


4

3

- -

- -

- -

- -

Colossoma macropomum
(Cuvier, 1818)


35

11

0.08

0.45

0.01

0.05

Metynnis hypsauchen
(Müller & Troschel, 1844)


13

8

0.04

0.03

0.05

0.00

Metynnis maculatus
(Kner, 1858)


30

8

0.17

0.00

0.00

0.00

Myleus tiete
(Eigenmann & Norris, 1900)


3

3

- -

- -

- -

- -

Mylossoma aureum
(Agassiz, 1829)


32

10

0.02

0.00

0.06

0.28

Mylossoma duriventre
(Cuvier, 1818)


157

19

0.06

0.18

0.66

1.00

Piaractus brachypomus
(Cuvier, 1818)


4

4

- -

- -

- -

- -

Pygocentrus nattereri
Kner, 1858

p

397

39

0.46

4.06

1.35

0.46

Serrasalmus compressus
Jégu, Leão & Santos, 1991

p

21

16

0.07

0.05

0.04

0.04

Serrasalmus eigenmanni
Norman, 1929

p

115

21

0.61

0.03

0.08

0.01

Serrasalmus elongatus
Kner, 1858

p

23

14

0.01

0.03

0.06

0.19

Serrasalmus hollandi
Eigenmann, 1915

p

372

45

0.35

1.68

1.29

1.61

Serrasalmus rhombeus
(Linnaeus, 1766)

p

474

42

0.68

0.37

1.50

2.60

Serrasalmus spilopleura
Kner, 1858

p

37

12

0.20

0.05

0.01

0.00

Poptella compressa
(Günther, 1864)


235

20

1.29

0.08

0.08

0.03

Stethaprion crenatum
Eigenmann, 1916


163

14

0.06

0.26

1.45

0.06

Tetragonopterus argenteus
Cuvier, 1816

7

4

0.01

0.00

0.04

0.01


Curimatidae








Curimata sp.


27

8

0.15

0.00

0.00

0.03

Curimatella alburna
(Müller & Troschel, 1844)


1069

27

5.81

0.16

0.31

0.46

Curimatella dorsalis
(Eigenmann & Eigenmann, 1889)


55

3

0.21

0.00

0.20

0.00

Curimatella immaculata
(Fernández-Yépez, 1948)


38

5

0.00

0.00

0.01

0.48

Curimatella meyeri
(Steindachner, 1882)


131

17

0.51

0.08

0.41

0.03

Curimatella sp.


431

7

2.48

0.00

0.00

0.05

Potamorhina altamazonica
(Cope, 1878)


135

31

0.04

0.81

0.49

0.66

Potamorhina latior
(Spix & Agassiz, 1829)


2058

34

0.05

9.59

7.54

12.52

Psectrogaster amazonica Eigenmann & Eigenmann, 1889


95

7

0.07

1.91

0.11

0.00

Psectrogaster curviventris
Eigenmann & Kennedy, 1903


119

15

0.18

0.10

0.56

0.40

Psectrogaster rutiloides
(Kner, 1858)


395

25

0.08

1.81

1.70

1.96

Psectrogaster sp.


2

2

- -

- -

- -

- -

Steindachnerina sp.


14

5

0.00

0.05

0.00

0.15

Cynodontidae








Cynodon gibbus
Spix & Agassiz, 1829

p

29

8

0.02

0.13

0.20

0.01

Hydrolycus scomberoides
(Cuvier, 1816)

p

65

17

0.01

0.37

0.33

0.24

Rhaphiodon vulpinus
Spix & Agassiz, 1829

p

69

23

0.00

0.08

0.30 0.

49

Erythrinidae








Hoplerythrinus unitaeniatus
(Agassiz, 1829)


1

1

- -

- -

- -

- -

Hoplias malabaricus
(Bloch, 1794)

p

100

18

0.29

0.76

0.18

0.05

Gasteropelecidae








Thoracocharax stellatus
(Kner, 1858)


20

9

0.00

0.03

0.17

0.04

Hemiodontidae








Anodus elongatus
Agassiz, 1829


938

28

0.01

0.37

6.61

3.85

Lebiasinidae








Pyrrhulina vittata
Regan, 1912


1

1

- -

- -

- -

- -

Prochilodontidae








Prochilodus nigricans
Spix & Agassiz, 1829


133

28

0.50

0.31

0.19

0.22

Clupeiformes




3.15

1.65

14.08

11.90

Clupeidae








Pellona castelnaeana
Valenciennes, 1847

p

187

24

0.26

0.00

0.20

1.60

Pellona flavipinnis
(Valenciennes, 1836)

p

968

42

2.89

1.39

0.88

4.31

Engraulidae








Anchoviella cf. carrikeri
Fowler, 1940


2

1

- -

- -

- -

- -

Engraulidae sp.


1701

28

0.00

0.26

13.00

5.99

Gymnotiformes




0.58

5.87

1.10

0.36

Apteronotidae








Adontosternarchus sachsi


73

10

0.00

0.08

0.69

0.06

Apteronotus albifrons
(Linnaeus, 1766)


9

5

0.05

0.00

0.00

0.00

Sternarchorhynchus sp.


2

2

- -

- -

- -

- -

Gymnotidae








Gymnotus carapo
Linnaeus, 1758


4

3

- -

- -

- -

- -

Hypopomidae








Brachyhypopomus cf. brevirostris
(Steindachner, 1868)


15

5

0.03

0.08

0.05

0.01

Rhamphichthyidae








Rhamphichthys rostratus (Linnaeus, 1766)


19

9

0.05

0.13

0.02

0.04

Sternopygidae








Distocyclus conirostris
(Eigenmann & Allen, 1942)


1

1

- -

- -

- -

- -

Eigenmannia humboldtii
(Steindachner, 1878)


52

9

0.04

0.92

0.05

0.06

Eigenmannia virescens
(Valenciennes, 1842)


259

28

0.35

4.35

0.22

0.14

Sternopygus macrurus
(Bloch & Schneider, 1801)


29

16

0.05

0.31

0.06

0.04

Perciformes




0.35

3.09

0.52

3.65

Cichlidae








Astronotus crassipinnis
(Heckel, 1840)


2

1

- -

- -

- -

- -

Chaetobranchopsis orbicularis (Steindachner, 1875)


3

3

- -

- -

- -

- -

Chaetobranchus flavescens
Heckel, 1840


2

2

- -

- -

- -

- -

Aequidens sp.


1

1

- -

- -

- -

- -

Crenicichla sp.


1

1

- -

- -

- -

- -

Cichla monoculus
Spix & Agassiz, 1831

p

19

12

0.09

0.00

0.00

0.04

Crenicichla cf. semicincta
Steindachner, 1892


3

3

- -

- -

- -

- -

Satanoperca jurupari
(Heckel, 1840)


4

3

- -

- -

- -

- -

Sciaenidae








Pachypops trifilis
(Müller & Troschel, 1848)


1

1

- -

- -

- -

- -

Plagioscion squamosissimus
(Heckel, 1840)

p

492

38

0.26 3

.09

0.52

3.61

Pleuronectiformes








Achiridae








Achirus achirus
(Linnaeus, 1758)


1

1

- -

- -

- -

- -

Rajiformes








Potamotrygonidae








Potamotrygon cf. motoro
(Müller & Henle, 1841)


17

11

0.05

0.16

0.01

0.01

Siluriformes




7.26

24.71

44.81

25.04

Ageneiosidae








Ageneiosus inermis
(Linnaeus, 1766)

p

72

16

0.00

0.08

0.59

0.17

Ageneiosus brevis
Steindachner, 1881


384

9

0.00

0.24

3.94

0.04

Ageneiosus sp.

p

14

5

0.00

0.00

0.13

0.03

Ageneiosus ucayalensis
Castelnau, 1855


11

1

- -

- -

- -

- -

Tympanopleura sp.

p

246

15

0.00

0.10

1.95

0.75

Aspredinidae








Bunocephalus sp.


1

1

- -

- -

- -

- -

Auchenipteridae








Auchenipterus nuchalis
(Spix & Agassiz, 1829)


289

21

0.00

0.29

1.73

1.48

Centromochlus sp.


144

15

0.00

0.00

0.38

1.39

Entomocorus benjamini
Eigenmann, 1917


307

22

0.39

5.42

0.16

0.23

Epapterus dispilurus
Cope, 1878


124

15

0.00

0.42

0.98

0.21

Trachelyopterus striatulus
(Steindachner, 1877)


68

17

0.12

1.13

0.02

0.03

Tatia aulopygia
(Kner, 1858)


1

1

- -

- -

- -

- -

Callichthyidae








Brochis splendens
(Castelnau, 1855)


44

3

0.00

0.00

0.46

0.01

Corydoras sp.


64

4

0.00

0.00

0.59

0.10

Dianema longibarbis
Cope, 1872


5

4

0.00

0.05

0.02

0.00

Hoplosternum littorale
(Hancock, 1828)


3

1

- -

- -

- -

- -

Megalechis thoracata
(Valenciennes, 1840)


17

6

0.01

0.10

0.13

0.00

Doradidae








Anadoras weddellii
(Castelnau, 1855)


19

4

0.00

0.45

0.02

0.00

Astrodoras asterifrons
(Kner, 1853)


1

1

- -

- -

- -

- -

Doras sp.


178

22

0.02

1.28

1.08

0.30

Opsodoras sp.


120

9

0.00

0.00

1.00

0.33

Platydoras costatus
(Linnaeus, 1758)


10

5

0.06

0.00

0.00

0.00

Oxydoras niger
(Valenciennes, 1821)


30

13

0.05

0.42

0.00

0.06

Pterodoras granulosus
(Valenciennes, 1821)


4

4

- -

- -

- -

- -

Trachydoras paraguayensis
(Eigenmann & Ward, 1907)


114

17

0.09

1.62

0.19

0.23









Heptapteridae








Pimelodella spp.










720

30

3.88

0.58

0.20

0.15

Loricariidae








Hypoptopoma joberti
(Vaillant, 1880)


3644

29

0.01

3.35

25.76

13.97

Hypostomus sp.


18

11

0.05

0.05

0.01

0.08

Pterygoplichthys sp.


129

27

0.22

2.04

0.13

0.01

Hemiodontichthys acipenserinus
(Kner, 1853)


15

11

0.02

0.26

0.01

0.00

Rineloricaria cf. lanceolata
(Günther, 1868)


7

5

0.01

0.03

0.03

0.03

Sturisoma nigrirostrum
Fowler, 1940


107

10

0.00

0.03

0.86

0.32

Loricaria cf. simillima
Regan, 1904


119

16

0.47

0.05

0.07

0.37

Loricariichthys maculatus
(Bloch, 1794)


164

34

0.51

0.97

0.21

0.24

Pseudohemiodon laticeps
(Regan, 1904)


43

9

0.06

0.00

0.19

0.19

Ancistrus sp.


7

6

0.00

0.00

0.04

0.04

Pimelodidae








Hemisorubim platyrhynchos
(Valenciennes, 1840)

p

8

7

0.01

0.03

0.01

0.05

Leiarius marmoratus
(Gill, 1870)


1

1

- -

- -

- -

- -

Phractocephalus hemioliopterus
(Bloch & Schneider, 1801)


1

1

- -

- -

- -

- -

Pimelodina flavipinnis
Steindachner, 1876


1

1

- -

- -

- -

- -

Pimelodus gr. maculatus-blochi


479

40

1.16

4.03

0.54

0.95

Pinirampus pirinampu
(Spix & Agassiz, 1829)

p

46

16

0.00

0.03

0.35

0.15

Pseudoplatystoma fasciatum
(Linnaeus, 1766)

p

28

15

0.03

0.13

0.10

0.10

Pseudoplatystoma tigrinum
(Valenciennes, 1840)

p

24

11

0.01

0.39

0.01

0.09

Sorubim lima
(Bloch & Schneider, 1801)

p

196

19

0.01

0.58

1.08

0.91

Hypophthalmus edentatus Spix & Agassiz, 1829


109

33

0.05

0.37

0.36

0.67

Hypophthalmus marginatus Valenciennes, 1840


166

23

0.01

0.18

1.06

0.75

Calophysus macropterus
(Lichtenstein, 1819)

p

84

17

0.00

0.00

0.41

0.58

Total catch number and relative abundance of piscivores (30 species)


5757


13.0

17.2

12.9

21.2

The proportions of individual species, major orders and piscivores differed among lake-types (Table 2). Characiforms dominated savannah lake assemblages (88.6 percent) whereas siluriforms dominated forest lakes (44.8 percent) and were relatively uncommon in the savannah lakes (7.3 percent). Clupeiforms were common in forest and Mamoré lakes. Gymnotiforms were mostly captured in floodplain edge lakes. Similarly, relative abundance of most species differed among lake-types (Table 2). As an example of extreme patterns, the relative abundance of M. dichroura increased from the Mamoré lakes to the savannah lakes and the relative abundance of T. albus declined along the same gradient. Other species colonized preferentially one lake-type, such as Aphyocharax anisisti, which was present almost exclusively in floodplain edge lakes and Anodus elongatus and Engraulidae sp., which were captured mostly in forest and Mamoré lakes.

RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN ASSEMBLAGE STRUCTURE AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS

Six environmental variables (conductivity, shape, water depth, Secchi transparency, temperature and lake area) were retained among the eight internal variables by the forward selection procedure in the CCA analysis. The CCA revealed a significant overall relationship between species CPUE and environmental internal variables (n = 57 lake-date combinations; p < 0.001), with the first three canonical axes jointly explaining 80.8 percent of the variation in the speciesenvironment relationship (respectively 50.8, 20.4 and 9.7 percent; Table 3).

The CCA ordination shows a segregation of lake-types (spatial effect) on the first two axes (Figure 3). The temporal effect (dry vs. wet season) is reflected in a systematic shift in sample positions that is consistent across lake-types, but small relative to overall variation among samples. Savannah lakes were grouped in the lower left part of the CCA graph and differed markedly from the oxbow lakes in assemblage structure as well as in area, shape and conductivity. Savannah lakes also showed limited seasonal variation relative to oxbow lakes. Samples from oxbow lakes were concentrated in an elliptical cluster aligned with gradients in Secchi transparency and water depth. The cluster spanned from dry season samples of floodplain edge lakes (upper left portion of the plot) to wet season samples of Mamoré lakes (lower right).

Table 3: Results of canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) linking abundance of 103 fish species transformed as ln(CPUE + 1), to six internal variables in eight lakes of the central Mamoré floodplain (n = 57 lake-date combinations). Monte Carlo tests for significance of first canonical axis and for all axes together: p < 0.001 (n = 1,000 permutations).


Axis1

Axix2

Axis3

Eigenvalue

0.382

0.154

0.073

Cumulative% of explained variance of species-Env.relation

50.76

71.16

80.83

Species-Env. correlation ®

0.951

0.915

0.811

Canonical coefficients




Temperature

0.058

-0.062

0.098

Water depth

0.924

-0.304

-0.678

Secchi transparency

-0.038

-0.280

1.220

Conductivity

-0.145

0.256

-0.134

Area

-0.556

-0.761

-0.532

Shape

0.019

-0.209

-0.348

Correlations of environmental variables with ordination axes




Temperature

0.171

-0.236

-0.048

Water depth

0.823

-0.433

-0.082

Secchi transparency

0.502

-0.523

0.457

Conductivity

0.658

0.196

-0.226

Area

-0.505

-0.759

-0.123

Shape

0.723

0.028

-0.309

Species points in the ordination plot correspond approximately to the mode of their distributions along the environmental gradients (Ter Braak 1986). Patterns of distribution at the ordinal level can be broadly characterized as follows. The savannah lake samples were dominated mostly by characiform species that were not well represented in the oxbow lakes. All other species were associated mainly with the transparencywater depth gradient (TWD gradient): species found in more turbid and shallow conditions were located in the upper left portion of the ordination plot, whereas species found in clearer and deeper conditions were located in the lower right portion of the plot. Characiform species were evenly distributed between the two portions of the TWD gradient and the savannah lakes samples. Siluriform species were almost absent from the savannah lakes (only 4 of 39 species were present), but were distributed more or less uniformly along the TWD gradient. Gymnotiforms were most abundant in turbid, shallow waters. In contrast, the three clupeiform species had highest abundance in clearer, deeper waters.

Figure 3. Graphical output of canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) linking abundance of 103 fish species, transformed as ln(CPUE + 1), to six internal variables in eight lakes of the central Mamoré floodplain (n = 57 lake-date combinations). Ordination plots for samples (A), environmental variables (B), and individual species (C) are presented separately to avoid cluttering.

Variation partitioning

Table 4: Partitioning of variation in abundance of 103 fish species, transformed as ln(CPUE + 1), at two spatial scales (landscape and internal). The total inertia (sum of eigenvalues) is partitioned into four fractions, three of which correspond to explained variance (landscape, internal, shared), and an unexplained fraction.


Inertia

% of total
variation
explained

partitioning
of explained
variation (%)

1) Total variation (CA fish)

2.39



2) CCA Fish vs Whole-lake

0.754

31.5


3) CCA Fish vs Supra-lake

0.572

23.9


4) Partial CCA Fish vs Whole-lake/Supr-lake

0.398

16.7


5) Partial CCA Fish vs Supra-lake/Whole-lake

0.216

9.0


6) Total explained variation (2+5=3+4)

0.970

40.6


Unexplained variation (1-6)

1.42

59.4


Whole-leke variables effect (4)

0.398


41.0

Supra-lake variables effect (5)

0.216


22.3

Shared effect (2-3=3-4)

0.356


36.7

In principle, partitioning of variation could be used to estimate the relative contribution not only of the two spatial scales, but of seasonal change as well. However, to simplify the interpretation and because CCA results showed that in the study system seasonal variation was very limited relative to spatial variation, partitioning of variation was conducted only between the two spatial scales. Landscape and internal variables jointly explained 40.6 percent of variation of the species matrix (Table 4). The unexplained variation corresponds to stochastic fluctuations as well as other biotic or abiotic effects not included in the analysis. The explained variation was partitioned into three components: 41 percent corresponded to internal variables, 22.3 percent to landscape variables and 36.7 percent to a shared influence of both types of variables.

Figure 4. Graphical output of partial canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) linking abundance of 103 fish species, transformed as ln(CPUE + 1), to two landscape variables in eight lakes of the central Mamoré floodplain (n = 57 lake-date combinations). The effect of the six significant internal variables was partialled out. Ordination biplots are given separately for individual species and environmental variables. Nocon = connectivity, CVPCA = temporal stability of internal variables (see text).

In the partial CCA that controlled for internal variables, two landscape variables were retained by the forward selection procedure: the overall measure of temporal variation, CVPCA (p < 0.001) and a binary variable indicating the presence or absence of a connection to the main river channel, NOCON (p = 0.003) (Figure 4). However, the position of the connectivity variable very near the origin of the ordination plot relative to the overall dispersion, suggests that the effect of connectivity was not large. Furthermore, there was no obvious pattern relating connectivity to the distribution of major taxa on the plot. In contrast, the distributions of gymnotiforms and characiforms were associated with variable CVPCA even after the effect of internal variables had been removed; the former were associated with fluctuating conditions whereas the latter were associated with more stable conditions (Figure 4).

Figure 5. Arcsine-transformed relative abundance of major taxa and piscivores in relation to water transparency. Each data point represents one lake-date combination (open circles: savannah lakes; filled circles: oxbow lakes). Solid lines are lowess regression curves for the oxbow lakes. Lowess regression curves for similar data from the Orinoco (Rodríguez & Lewis 1997) and Araguaia (Tejerina-Garro et al. 1998) floodplains are given also.

Applicability of the PTM model to the Mamoré floodplain

Variation of relative abundance of major orders along the gradient of transparency in the Mamoré oxbow lakes appeared broadly similar to those for the Araguaia and Orinoco floodplains (Figure 5). Secchi transparency was strongly associated with the abundance of clupeiforms (positive relationship) and gymnotiforms (negative relationship). Characiforms had highest relative abundance in clearer lakes, whereas siluriforms had highest relative abundance in more turbid lakes, but the relationships appeared weaker (with broader scatter) for these two groups in the Mamoré than in the Araguaia and Orinoco floodplains.

Characiforms were common and siluriforms uncommon in savannah lakes (15 samples) relative to oxbow lakes (42 samples). Fish assemblages in savannah lakes do not respond to the same environmental gradients as in oxbow lakes, e.g. abundance trends for characiforms and siluriforms in relation to transparency are neutral or opposite those in oxbow lakes and the Orinoco and Araguaia floodplains.

DISCUSSION

The results revealed strong relationships between fish assemblage structure and abiotic environmental features in eight lakes of the Mamoré floodplain. Fish assemblages were structured primarily along a marked spatial gradient correlated with internal and landscape variables. Spatial variation was stronger than temporal variation, as evidenced by large differences between lake-types relative to seasonal differences within lake types. Consequently, temporal variation was not interpreted on the basis of differences between dry and wet seasons, but remained indirectly included by way of the landscape variable CVPCA, an indicator of the amplitude of seasonal fluctuations in each lake. Ordination results showed major effects of water transparency and water depth on fish assemblage structure and less marked effects of pH, conductivity and temperature. In contrast to studies in other river systems, fish assemblage structure in the Mamoré floodplain, surveyed during wet and dry seasons, also seemed to be influenced by landscape variables.

Structural complexity and hydrological dynamics of the floodplain provide a broad range of habitat conditions that support high fish diversity (Welcomme 1985; Lowe-McConnell 1987). Seasonal connectivity renders the floodplain an open system in which many species can disperse. Consequently, assemblage structure in lakes can change seasonally and yearly as a function of variation in ecological conditions and reproductive success of species. Several studies have failed to link patterns of fish distribution to lake characteristics in neotropical floodplains (Bonetto Cordiviola de Yuan and Pignalberi 1970; Cordiviola de Yuan 1980; Lowe-McConnell 1987; Saint-Paul et al. 2000) and the assemblages have often been viewed as stochastic, mainly because of their strong interannual variability (Lowe-McConnell 1964; Cordiviola de Yuan 1980; Goulding. Carvalho and Ferreira 1988; Merona and Bittencourt 1993). However, differences between fish assemblages of white and black water lakes have been reported (Marlier 1968; Rodríguez and Lewis 1994; Saint-Paul et al. 2000) and fish assemblage structure in neotropical floodplains has been interpreted in relation to water quality variables that reflect instantaneous and local conditions, such as temperature, pH and oxygen concentration (Kramer et al. 1978; Junk, Soares and Carvalho 1983; Welcomme 1985; Goulding et al. 1988; Henderson and Crampton 1997). Welcomme (1985) suggested that lake morphometry plays a role in structuring fish assemblages, as exemplified by influence of lake size and bottom type on fish species composition and body size. Two recent studies that examined the effects of water quality, lake morphometry and landscape-level features (distance to main river channel, connectivity, forest cover) on fish assemblages of the Orinoco (Venezuela) and Araguaia (Brazil) floodplains, found that assemblage structure was associated mostly with two internal variables, water transparency and lake depth (Rodríguez and Lewis 1997; Tejerina-Garro et al. 1998).

Both studies concluded that fish assemblage structure during the dry season was controlled primarily by internal variables, with no detectable influence of landscape variables. Because of high variability in the inter-annual hydrologic conditions and high potential connectivity between the lakes, it might be expected that the spatial position of lakes does not play a major role in assemblage structure. Given that many fish can migrate, fish could be assumed to colonize lakes according to internal conditions, with little influence of lake position on the floodplain. However, lakes of the Mamoré floodplain are spatially structured at both internal and landscape levels, countering the previous assumption. Although flooding and dispersal could potentially lead to homogenisation of fish assemblages across the floodplain, the gradual evolution of lakes along the successional gradient determined by their spatial position relative to the Mamoré River (and related landscape variables) results in spatial heterogeneity of internal attributes and assemblage structure (relative abundances of major taxa and piscivores).

A salient result was the marked difference in fish assemblages and environmental conditions between savannah lakes and oxbow lakes, which indicates that the savannah lakes are not subject to the same ecological and physical dynamics as the oxbow lakes. Savannah lakes are large, shallow isolated lakes characterized by high stability of internal conditions. Except for their low conductivity, they have water quality characteristics comparable to those of oxbow lakes. Fish assemblages in savannah lakes changed relatively little between seasons. In contrast to oxbow lakes, savannah lakes yielded few siluriforms and gymnotiforms and characiforms were dominant. Because savannah lakes remain isolated for long periods of time, local species extinction may not be compensated by colonization as readily as in lakes with higher connectivity. As a consequence, species abundance and survival in isolated lakes may depend more on ecological attributes conferring local adaptation than on replenishment by recurrent movement or colonization events. Several characiform species seemed adapted to these conditions.

CCA showed that oxbow lakes were arranged along successional gradient of internal conditions, especially transparency and water depth. Mamoré lakes were deeper and clearer; lakes at the annual floodplain edge were more turbid and shallower. Oxbow lakes of the Mamoré floodplain are subject to annual isolation and flooding. These lakes may favour species able to respond to contrasting habitat conditions by moving or adopting ecological strategies. Several previous studies have suggested that exchanges of fish among lakes and the main river channel during the wet season lead to stochastic reassortment of species among the lakes. In contrast, species distributions showed clear patterns for clupeiforms, which were associated with more transparent and deeper lakes near to the Mamoré River and gymnotiforms, which were mostly associated with more turbid, shallower lakes at the forested floodplain edge. However, no clear pattern was apparent in the oxbow lakes for characiform and siluriform species, which were distributed more or less evenly along the lake gradient.

CCA provides modal positions of individual species on the lake-type and TWD gradient. However, the ordination plot for species distributions is not robust to random fluctuation in the position of rare species and, more generally, does not weigh species in relation to their abundances. In contrast, the relation between relative abundance of major taxa and water transparency integrates abundance over species, so that rare species do not unduly influence the analysis.

The results for major taxa in the Mamoré River floodplain appeared concordant with predictions of the piscivory-transparency-morphometry (PTM) model, originally developed for floodplain lakes of the Orinoco River (Rodríguez and Lewis 1997) and subsequently tested in the Araguaia River floodplain (Tejerina-Garro et al. 1998) (Figure 4). In the present study, an interaction of sampling methodology with water transparency could have influenced patterns of relative abundance. Although species that are not visually oriented might have equal probability of capture in clear and turbid lakes, visually oriented fishes might be able to detect gillnets more readily in clear water and thus be more vulnerable to capture in turbid water (K. Winemiller pers. comm.). However, predictions of the PTM model seem robust and general, because similar results were obtained in three different floodplain systems (Orinoco, Araguaia, Mamoré) sampled with different gears (electrofishing, minnow traps and gillnets and gillnets respectively). A general pattern arising from the comparison of results from these three systems is that relative abundances of siluriforms and gymnotiforms decline with increasing water clarity, whereas relative abundances of characiforms and clupeiforms increase. These results are consistent with the interpretation that differences in sensory capabilities (whether prevailing sensory modes are visual vs. chemical, tactile, or auditory) strongly influence species distributions along a gradient of water transparency (Rodríguez and Lewis 1997; Tejerina-Garro et al. 1998).

Similar to earlier findings, in the Mamoré floodplain some apparent exceptions can be explained by specific adaptations (Rodríguez and Lewis 1997). For example, several of the characiforms that are common in turbid waters are surface specialists (Triportheus, Hydrolycus, Cynodon) (Goulding 1980) or have lateral line adaptations to turbid environments (Roeboides) (Sazima 1983). Cichlids are visually oriented fishes that are mostly associated with transparent waters. They are poorly represented in the Mamoré and only the distribution of Cichla monoculus was included in our analysis (Table 2). Although C. monoculus had few occurrences, all individuals were captured in relatively transparent waters in the savannah and Mamoré lake samples. This result agrees with Rodríguez and Lewis’ (1997) observation that cichlids had a unimodal distribution peaking in relatively clear lakes and is also consistent with the PTM interpretation. Interestingly, the relative abundance of “other taxa” in the Orinoco (mostly Plagioscion, Achirus and Potamorrhaphis), Araguaia (Osteoglossum, Plagioscion) and Mamoré (Plagioscion, Potamotrygon) floodplains declines with increasing transparency, suggesting that generally these taxa are most abundant in turbid waters.

In the Orinoco floodplain, piscivorous species, with the exception of Acestrorhynchus, showed decreasing abundance or unimodal (Cichla and Boulengerella) distributions in relation to transparency (Rodríguez and Lewis 1997). A similar result applies in the Mamoré floodplain, where the relative abundance of the most abundant piscivores remains relatively constant around 20 percent in turbid waters (Secchi depth <20 cm), but then declines progressively to < 5 percent as water transparency increases beyond 20 cm (Figure 5). This 20 cm threshold is also apparent in the Orinoco floodplain for predators and knifefishes (Figures 2 and 3 in Rodríguez and Lewis 1997). There may thus exist a threshold for visual search at that transparency level that drives an ecological switch in foraging modes (and perhaps in predator avoidance tactics as well). Many piscivores seem well adapted for foraging in low transparency conditions and even species morphologically adapted for visual hunting have developed special strategies for foraging in turbid waters (e.g. cynodontids, Roeboides; Rodríguez and Lewis 1997).

The two Mamoré savannah lakes did not conform to the PTM model. Although intermediate in transparency, they supported relatively few siluriforms and gymnotiforms. This lack of support for the PTM model might be attributed to the lack of connection of these lakes with the rest of the system during the annual flood. Savannah lakes probably do not undergo the seasonal cycle of recolonization followed by culling of vulnerable prey by piscivores as postulated by the

PTM model. This result suggests that siluriforms and gymnotiforms may require, in addition to a favourable optical environment, ecological conditions such as seasonal access to the lakes from the river. By way of comparison, “morichal” lakes in Venezuela are adjacent to the floodplain, but have no seasonal connections to floodwater. Morichal lakes are small, highly transparent lakes of low conductivity within formations of the palm Mauritia flexuosa and fed mainly by seepage. Similar to Mamoré savannah lakes, morichal lakes are generally dominated by characiforms and have low relative abundance of siluriforms and gymnotiforms.

Partitioning of variation showed that although internal variables, especially transparency and water depth, play an important role in structuring fish assemblages, landscape variables such as distance to the river, connectivity and environmental variability also influenced assemblage structure. Because the measured internal variables do not completely characterize landscape conditions and conversely, the landscape variables do not fully account for variation in internal features, the two sets of variables are complementary. The Mamoré findings support the notion of hierarchical control of assemblage structure, similar to the sequence of “filters” proposed by Tonn et al. (1990).

Landscape variables (likely distance from the river channel and its corollary, flood period) operate as a primary filter that differentially limits dispersion to the savannah lakes, possibly affecting siluriforms more strongly than characiforms. Internal processes appear to exert stronger control in the oxbow lakes, where the colonization filter might be weak. Landscape filters also may play a role in the distribution of clupeiforms and gymnotiforms, both of which were mostly associated with specific lake-types, but in this case internal variables can be invoked to interpret species distributions. In contrast, landscape filters may not operate for siluriforms and characiforms in oxbow lakes; these species appeared more influenced by internal variables, especially transparency. Because of marked differences in connectivity between savannah and oxbow lakes, colonization or migration may be the processes most likely affected by landscape differences in this system.

Other processes, however, such as tolerance to environmental fluctuation (as quantified by CV) may be affected as well. The savannah lakes present relatively stable conditions, whereas among the oxbow lakes environmental variability increases with distance to the Mamoré River. The floodplain edge lakes had the lowest stability and also had extreme low values for water depth (<0.5 m in the samples; some lakes can dry out entirely at the end of the dry season in years with low rainfall). Changes in fish assemblage structure along an environmental gradient of harshness-stability determined by periodic hypoxia were described for bog lakes in northern Wisconsin, USA (Rahel 1984); a similar gradient driven by periodic hypoxia and dessication was found for oxbow lakes in Texas, United States (Winemiller et al. 2000).

In the Mamoré floodplain, the relatively large proportion of variation (36.7 percent; Table 4) associated with the “shared” component in the CCA indicated that effects of lake type and lake internal environmental conditions are partly confounded, as is likely the case in other floodplain systems. Although the influence of landscape conditions on assemblage structure is partly mediated through their relationship to internal features such as transparency and depth, which in the Mamoré floodplain vary predictably with lake position, landscape variables also contributed to the “pure” spatial component of variation in assemblage structure, which was unrelated to the measured environmental variables and accounted for 22.3 percent of total variation (Table 4). The partial CCA that examined the “pure” spatial component shed additional light on the role of landscape conditions, by showing that gymnotiforms were associated with fluctuating environmental conditions whereas characiforms were associated with more stable environmental conditions (Figure 4). None of the other major taxa showed a patterned distribution on the partial CCA plot. Although interpretable in principle on the basis of life-history strategies (r-K continuum, generalist-specialist, bethedging) at the ordinal level, these results do not mesh smoothly with previous categorizations of Neotropical fishes.

An analysis of patterns of covariation of ten life-history traits for 71 fish species in the Venezuelan llanos revealed a strong phylogenetic effect on life history strategies (Winemiller 1989). In that study, gymnotiforms were classed as “seasonal” (characterized by synchronized reproduction during the early wet season, high fecundity, absence of parental care, breeding migrations); cichlids were mostly “equilibrium” (parental care and aseasonal reproduction); characiforms were mostly “seasonal” with some “opportunistic” (rapid colonization, early maturation, continuous reproduction, small clutches); finally, siluriform species were split between the “seasonal” and “equilibrium” categories. Winemiller (1989) noted specific instances of fishes with divergent strategies in an environment that should favour only one of the strategies and suggested differential species trophic adaptations, perceived variation in resource abundance and predation pressure. If this explanation applies broadly, information on trophic linkages may complement that on abiotic environmental fluctuations when interpreting life history adaptations of fish species to spatial heterogeneity in the floodplain.

In conclusion, internal variables are linked to processes that modify assemblage structure via biotic and abiotic interactions within individual lakes, whereas landscape variables reflect processes related mostly to movement of fish among lakes and habitat selection based on large-scale landscape features. At the ordinal level, clupeids, gymnotiforms and siluriforms had distributions that may be controlled by both internal and landscape variables. In contrast, the distribution of characiform did not seem limited by the landscape variables. In the Mamoré River floodplain, characiforms seemed to have the greatest potential for colonization, as reflected by their distribution across all lake-types. Siluriforms were more spatially restricted, possibly in relation to their migratory requirements. Gymnotiforms and clupeids had the lowest potential for colonization, as inferred from their limited spatial distributions in this relatively open system.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was part of the BIOBAB project (Aquatic Biodiversity in the Bolivian Amazon Basin) developed by IRD, La Paz University and Trinidad University. Takayuki Yunoki and Alfredo Parada, from Trinidad University and Jean Louis Menou, from IRD, helped with logistics, fieldwork and identification of specimens. We also thank Luis Torres (Trinidad University) for his helpful participation in the BIOBAB project. Kirk Winemiller (Texas A&M University) kindly reviewed the manuscript and provided helpful comments.

REFERENCES

Amoros C., Roux A. L., Reygrobellet J. L., Bravard J.P. & Pautou, G. 1987. A method for applied ecological studies of fluvial hydrosystems. Regulated Rivers: Research & Management, 1: 17-36.

Angermeier P.L. & Winston M.R. 1998. Local vs. regional influences on local diversity in stream fish communities of Virginia. Ecology, 79: 911- 927.

Bonnetto A., Cordiviola de Yuan E. & Pignalberi C. 1970. Nuevos datos sobre poblaciones de peces en ambientes leníticos permanentes del Paraná medio. Physis, 30: 141-154.

Borcard D., Legendre P. & Drapeau P. 1992. Partialling out the spatial component of ecological variation. Ecology, 73: 1045-1055.

Cordiviola de Yuan E. 1980. Campaña limnológica Keratella I en el río Paraná medio: Taxocenoses de peces de ambientes leníticos. Ecology Argentina, 4: 103-113.

Denevan W.M. 1966. The aboriginal cultural geography of the llanos de Moxos of Bolivia. Berkeley, CA, USA, University of Califronia Press.

Goulding, M. 1980. The fishes and the forest. Exploration in Amazon natural history. Berkeley, CA, USA, University of California Press.

Goulding M., Carvalho M.L. & Ferreira E.G. 1988. Rio Negro: Rich life in poor water. The Hague, SBP Publishing Company.

Henderson P.A. & Crampton G.R. 1997. A comparison of fish diversity and abundance between nutrientrich and nutrient-poor lakes in the Upper Amazon. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 13: 175-198.

Ibañez C. 2000. Composición de la comunidad de zooplancton en ocho lagunas de la planicie de inundación del Río Mamoré. Tesis de Licenciatura, La Paz University.

Junk W.J., Soares G.M. & Carvalho F.M. 1983. Distribution of fish species in a lake of the Amazon river floodplain near Manaus Lago Camaleão, with special reference to extreme oxygen conditions. Amazoniana, 7: 397-431.

Junk W.J., Bayley P.B. & Sparks R.E. 1989. The flood pulse concept in river-floodplain systems. In D.P. Dodge ed. Proceedings of the international large rivers symposium. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. Spec. Publ., 106: 110-127.

Keddy P.A. 1992. Assembly and response rules: Two goals for predictive community ecology. Journal of Vegetation Science, 3: 157-163.

Kramer D.L., Lindsey C.C., Moodie G.E.E. & Stevens E.D. 1978. The fishes and the aquatic environment of the Central Amazon Basin, with particular reference to respiratory patterns. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 56: 717-729.

Lauzanne L. & Loubens G. 1985. Peces del rio Mamoré. Travaux et Documents No. 192. Paris, ORSTOM.

Lauzanne L., Loubens G. & Le Guennec B. 1991. Liste commentée des poissons de l’Amazonie bolivienne. Revue d’Hydrobiologie Tropicale, 24: 61-76.

Loubens G., Lauzanne L. & Le Guennec B. 1992. Les milieux aquatiques de la région de Trinidad Béni, Amazonie bolivienne. Revue d’Hydrobiologie Tropicale, 25: 3-21.

Lowe-McConnell R.H. 1964. The fishes of the Rupununi savannah district of British Guiana, South America. Part 1. Ecological groupings of the fish species and the effects of the seasonal cycle on the fish. Journal of the Linnean Society Zoology, 45: 103-144.

Lowe-McConnell R.H. 1975. Fish communities in tropical freshwaters. London, Longman. 337 pp.

Lowe-McConnell R.H. 1987. Ecological studies in tropical fish communities. Tropical Biology Series. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Magalhães M.F., Batalha D.C. & Collares-Pereira M.J. 2002. Gradients in stream fish assemblages across a Mediterranean landscape: Contributions of environmental factors and spatial structure. Freshwater Biology, 47: 1015-1031.

Marlier G. 1968. Etudes sur les lacs de l’Amazonie centrale. III- Les poissons du lac Redondo et leur régime alimentaire; les chaines trophiques du lac Redondo; les poissons du rio Prêto da Eva. Cadernos Amazonia INPA, Manaus, 11: 21-57.

Merona, B. de & Bittencourt M.M. 1993. Les peuplements de poissons du Lago do Rei, un lac d’inondation d’Amazonie central: Description générale. Amazoniana, 12: 415-441.

Rahel F.J. 1984. Factors structuring fish assemblages along a bog lake successional gradient. Ecology, 65: 1276-1289.

Rodríguez M.A. & Lewis W.M. Jr. 1994. Regulation and stability in fish assemblages of neotropical floodplain lakes. Oecologia, 99: 166-180.

Rodríguez M.A. & Lewis W.M. Jr. 1997. Structure of fish assemblages along environmental gradients in floodplain lakes of the Orinoco River. Ecological Monographs, 67: 109-128.

Saint-Paul U., Zuanon J., Villacorta Correa M.A., Garcia M., Fabré N. N., Berger U. & Junk W.J. 2000. Fish communities in central Amazonian white- and blackwater floodplains. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 57: 235- 250.

Sazima I. 1983. Scale-eating in characoids and other fishes. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 9: 87- 101.

Tejerina-Garro F. L., Fortin R. & Rodríguez M.A. 1998. Fish community structure in relation to environmental variation in floodplain lakes of the Araguaia River, Amazon Basin. Environmental Biology of Fishes 51: 399-410.

Ter Braak C.F.J. 1986. Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology 67: 1167- 1179.

Tonn W.M., Magnuson J.J., Rask M. & Toivonen J. 1990. Intercontinental comparison of small lake fish assemblages: The balance between local and regional process. American Naturalist, 136: 345-375.

Welcomme R.L. 1985. River fisheries. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper 262. Rome, FAO.

Winemiller K.O. 1989. Patterns of variation in life history among South American fishes in seasonal environments. Oecologia, 81: 225-241.

Winemiller K.O., Tarim S., Shormann D. & Cotner J.B. 2000. Fish assemblage structure in relation to environmental variation among Brazos River oxbow lakes. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 129: 451-468.


Previous Page Top of Page Next Page