The charges that can be levied on the fishery by the fisheries department are set out in the Fisheries Act 1988, and were last revised in July 2000.
Vessel registration
As for the mainland, all vessels are subject to a once off registration fee, but in Zanzibar this can only be sanctioned by the fisheries department. The charge is fixed and does not vary with vessel size.
|
Charge basis |
Accruing to |
Collected via |
Charge rate |
Any vessel |
Once off |
Gov. of Zanzibar |
FDZ |
US$2.0 |
Vessel licence
Vessels must also pay an annual licence, which for artisanal vessels varies with LOA and type of propulsion, as detailed in Appendix Table 2. Vessels applying to fish in the EEZ are charged a flat rate per GRT.
|
Charge basis |
Accruing to |
Collected via |
Charge rate |
Artisanal vessel |
Annual |
Gov. of Zanzibar |
FDZ |
US$1.0 - 10.0 |
Sport fishing vessel |
Week, month or year |
|
|
US$6 - 30 |
EEZ vessel |
Annual |
|
|
US$80/GRT |
EEZ licence fees stand to dominate revenues from the fisheries sector. In 2003 the revenue earned from EEZ licences alone will be over 3 times the total revenue collected from the fisheries sector in 2002.
Fisher licence
Fishers must also purchase an annual licence from the fisheries department. This too varies in cost depending upon the size and propulsion of vessel the fisher uses Appendix Table 2.
|
Charge basis |
Accruing to |
Collected via |
Charge rate |
Artisanal fisher |
Annual |
Gov. of Zanzibar |
FDZ |
US$1.5 - 10.0 |
Export royalty
As on the mainland, exporters of fisheries products must pay a Royalty to the FDZ. In the case of Zanzibar the royalty is calculated on an ad valorem basis, at a fixed rate irrespective of the product.
|
Charge basis |
Accruing to |
Collected via |
Charge rate |
Export Royalty |
Per kilo |
Gov. of Zanzibar |
FDZ |
6% of value |
Up until 2003 export royalties were the largest contributor from the fisheries sector, making up (in 2002) over 70 percent of collected revenue.
There is no information available on revenues accruing to village committees.
Instrument |
Origin |
Purpose |
Legal status |
Observations |
Vessel registration fee |
· Fisheries Act 1988 |
Control of vessels operating in the fishery, register of ownership and vessel details. |
Rate last revised in 2000. Currently under revision as part of writing of new Fisheries Act, expected to be ratified by first quarter 2004 |
|
Annual vessel fishing licence |
Idem |
Revenue generation (EEZ fisheries); Statistical indicator. |
Idem |
Potential use in management of both small scale and industrial fisheries - operator "buys into" the resource. |
Annual fisher licence |
Idem |
Statistical indicator. |
|
As above |
Export Royalty |
Idem |
Revenue generation; Resource rent. |
Idem |
Charged at 6% of total value until 2000, then by value per kilo |
Detailed information on values remitted form the various fiscal instruments is presented in Appendix Table 11 and summarised in the figures below. The low levels of revenue collection are notable. In 2002 the FDZ collected a little over US$60 000, 60 percent of which was from royalties on seaweed export. The impact of increased sales of EEZ licences in 2003 is evident in Figure 5.
Figure 5 - Collected revenues (Zanzibar)
Figure 6 - Export royalty (Zanzibar)
No information was available on revenues collected at village level (for village government), but based on the same maximum rate of sales tax (fish levy) as the mainland (5 percent), total landing of 22 000 tonnes (Appendix Table 7), an average landed value of US$0.5/kilo and 40 percent coverage, total local revenues are estimated to be around US$220 000 per annum, over 3.5 times that accruing to central government.
Total taxation based on 2002 data is estimated as US$280 000 on product with a landed value of US$11 millions, equivalent to 2.5 percent of landed value.
Total production data for the artisanal fishery (Appendix Table 7) indicate consistently increasing catches over the past five years, but no data was available as to how effort had developed, and it is therefore not possible to make any judgement as to how charges have influenced effort.
As with mainland Tanzania, the sales of licences in the EEZ fishery has increased dramatically to 78 in 2003 (Appendix Table 10), over twice that of the mainland. This will be partially due to MCS initiatives and also a pro-active stance by the Government of Zanzibar to sell EEZ licences via an appointed agent/broker located abroad. Again, as with the mainland, licence sales is not considered a reliable indicator of effort.
From the previous section, it is apparent that charges made at village level on the fishery are very much greater than those made at the centre. It was reported both in Zanzibar and on the mainland that there is an increasing tendency to focus such charges on fishers from outside of the community (short-term migrants). Depending upon the scale of charges and their significance amongst other production costs, this may encourage more sedentary fishing practises.