by Rasheed Bashir Mazari
Introduction
The economy of Pakistan is largely based on agriculture. It contributes about 25 percent to the national economy, provides employment for over 44 percent of the labour force and is main source of income in rural areas, which accounts for 70 percent of total population. The well being of the economy depends largely on the production, processing and distribution of major products such as cotton, wheat, edible oil, sugar, milk and meat. In the last decade, agriculture grew at an annual average rate of 4.5 per cent and exhibited fluctuating trend mainly on account of weather conditions, pest attacks on crops, shortage of inputs and little attention given to its subsectors other than crop farming.
Plant protection measures currently comprise, largely, of the use of pesticides, which has grown from about 915 tons (230 tons active ingredient) in 1981 to 129 000 tons (28 500 tons active ingredient) in 2004. With regard to use, the most heavily covered crop is cotton followed by paddy, sugarcane, fruits and vegetables. Cotton alone accounts for about 70 percent of the total consumption of active ingredient of pesticides and this has resulted in the phenomenal rise in cotton production in the country.
The use of pesticides in Pakistan commenced in 1952. It started with the introduction of an aerial spraying program on the key crops such as, cotton, rice and sugarcane. Simultaneously, pesticides were also used for locust control. The desert locust control program was organized through an international network coordinated by the FAO.
Before 1971, pesticides to be imported were standardized by the Federal Government through Department of Plant Protection (DPP), since no rules and regulations were in place.
Agricultural Pesticides Ordinance (APO) was promulgated in 1971 to regulate import, manufacture, formulation, sale, distribution, use and advertisement of pesticides. Agricultural Pesticides Rules were made thereunder in 1973 and the whole business was put under regular standardization and registration with the help of Provincial Agriculture Departments. Pesticides are registered under the trade name (Form-1) after efficacy evaluation trials of two crop seasons by at least two research agencies including Provincial and Federal ones. The products to be approved under this scheme are first standardized by the provincial Governments with final approval granted by the Federal Government on advice of Agricultural Pesticides Technical Advisory Committee (APTAC). It normally takes three years to get a product approved under Form-I scheme.
In 1993, two new kinds of registration (Form-16 & Form-17) viz.; Generic Scheme and Permission/Registration Abroad Scheme were launched. Generic name registration is granted to products designated by the Federal Government, which are no valid patent right and are already tested and trialed on Farm-1. Permission (Registration Abroad) Scheme is conditional to the registration of new chemistries that are prior registered and used in any of the OECD countries or China. The result of liberalized policy of 1992 has been phenomenal. Import from diversified sources and induction of more than 350 new entrepreneurs as against about 30 until 1993 have given the desired results i.e. enhancement of healthy competition and the availability of effective and inexpensive pesticide products. Pesticide is the only agricultural input where the prices of frequently used products are either contained or have declined by 30-40 percent generally and in few cases even up to 62 percent specially reduction in price despite devaluation of Pak Rupee.
The registration position of pesticide compounds under various schemes is as follows:
|
Form-1 |
192 |
|
Form-16 (Generic) |
58 |
|
Form-17 (Registered Abroad) |
155 |
Department of Plant Protection under the policy advice of the Ministry of Food, Agriculture & Livestock has the mandate of registration and management of pesticides meant for the plant/crop protection or agriculture purpose.
Recently the Federal Government has taken up the revision of Agricultural Pesticides Act (APA) to make it abreast with the recent developments in the world. Draft of APA 2005 is ready for approval of the competent for authority.
A. Pest and pesticide management
Reliance on IPM has been stressed in the National Agricultural policy of Pakistan in 1980. The National Agricultural Commission in its report published in March 1988 has given broad out lines of IPM and recommended that IPM techniques should be adopted for major crops by 1992 or 1993 and for all crops by 1995.
Excessive use of pesticide is checked through pest warning/scouting system executed by the provincial agricultural departments. Farmers are advised through print and electronic media to undertake application of pesticides only when the pest population crosses the economic threshold level (ETL). In this way judicious use of pesticides is encouraged. The Government has also instituted a National Integrated Pest Management (IPM) programme to minimize the use of pesticides.
Similarly trainings are imparted to farmers in safe handling, use and application of pesticides by the provincial governments and the technical staff of the industry.
B. Testing, quality control and effects in the field
The legislation on the specifications of pesticides already exists in the Agricultural Pesticides Rules 1973. Method of analysis involves CIPAC, AOAC, PAC etc.
The check on the quality of pesticides, curbing the practice of sale of adulterated/ sub-standard pesticides, is maintained through network of inspectors and pesticides laboratories. Officers of provincial Agriculture Department are appointed as inspectors. Their position is as follows:
|
Punjab |
- |
232 |
|
Sindh |
- |
074 |
|
N.W.F.P |
- |
157 |
|
Baluchistan |
- |
092 |
|
Federal (Department of Plant Protection) |
- |
015 |
There are at present 10 pesticides laboratories with Public/Semi-Government sector, 29 with the private sector. Additionally under new legislation 50 repackaging units are also required to established pesticides laboratories.
C. Health and environment information
Government with the coordination of industry takes care of human health and the environment. Rules 37 to 41 specially mention all the requirements, which are necessary for Health and Environment.
There are regular surveys on occupational poisoning cases among farmers and industrial workers. Two poison centers are established in the country. One is in Faisalabad and the other is in Karachi.
D. Trends in pesticide manufacturing, use and trade
Local manufacturing in the country is very limited and is restricted to aluminium phosphide, copper oxychloride and zinc phosphide only. Local formulation has increased from 14 percent in 1984 to about 70 percent of the total supply in 2004. There are over two dozen formulation plants in the country. For local formulation, the technical grade of a pesticide and other substances including emulsifier, carrier and stabilizer etc. are imported separately, which, together with a solvent, generally xylene (locally available), are blended in precise proportions to produce the finished product. Due to increasing consumption of pesticides, different advanced technologies are required for new formulations.
E. Selected standards
Occupational Hazards
The Government has taken appropriate measures to ensure safety in use of pesticides. Pesticides are not allowed to be handled by persons not having prior approval of their activities from the government. The government has enforced legislation requiring registration of pesticides dealers/venders, distributors, formulators and re-packers. The license for dealership/vending is issued only to a person who has been duly trained in safe storage, transportation and use of pesticides. The distributors, inter alia, are required to employ adequate number of agricultural graduates to ensure safety in handling and judicious use of pesticides. The formulators/re-packers are likewise required to have arrangements of safe storage, proper waste disposal and regular medical check up of workers. No manual re-packing/re-filling is permitted. The importers/formulators are required to undertake to supervise re-packing/re-filling and labeling process carried out at a plant duly registered and pass on pesticides to the distributors, dealers/vendors only in retail packing. No person can store pesticides unless permission for the same is issued to him.
Packaging
All packaging is done at registered plants using automatic/semi-automatic filling system. Most liquid pesticides, depending on their chemical nature, are filled in CO-EX and PET bottles or tin cans. Bottles have seals, caps and shrink wraps over them. Powder pesticides are packed in hermetically sealed sachets and granules are packed in plastic bags further contained in cotton bags. The packaging ensures that pesticides are not deteriorated during their shelf-lives as well as there is no leakage.
Labelling
The Agricultural Pesticides Rules provides an exhaustive guideline for labeling following the FAO Guideline covering necessary aspects of safety. Appropriate warning symbol in accordance with the WHO's recommendation is displayed on label. Withholding period of pesticides is also required to be mentioned.
Application methods
Foliar application through knap-sack/power sprayers is most popular followed by the tractor-mounted sprayers. Some pesticides are sprayed by ULV sprayers as well. Granular pesticides are broadcast manually. Use of protective clothing/gears is little due to hot and humid conditions prevailing in the fields. Special protective clothing/gears are required to be developed suiting to the climatic conditions.
Phasing out severely toxic pesticides
Pakistan is the one of the few countries in the region to have banned use of all severely toxic and hazardous pesticides included in the PIC and POP list in the early 1990s. In addition to PIC/POP pesticides, several other pesticides have also been banned. Recently the government is considering to ban all formulations of monocrotophos and methamidophos. Practically no pesticide falling in the WHO Category I is used. Due to availability of comparatively safe new chemistry molecules and IGRs at competitive prices, the use of pesticides falling into WHO Category II is also declining. List of banned pesticides is enclosed.
Pesticides disposal
The Agricultural Pesticides Rules provides that the destruction and removal of the empty packages and pesticides remains shall be affected in such a manner that sources of water supply are not contaminated. The unclean packages shall be destroyed in a way as to preclude the possibility of their being reused for any purpose other than as base material. Further procedures for disposal of surplus pesticides and pesticides containers have been notified in 1984 encompassing small use, commercial and municipal use, in situ-disposal; organized disposal and landfill disposal sites.
National legislation and enforcement
National legislation exists in the form of Agricultural Pesticides Ordinance 1971 which is supported by the Agricultural Pesticides Rules 1973. The Rules are amended from time to with the approval of Agricultural Pesticides Technical Advisory Committee (APTAC). APTAC is at liberty to nominate sub committees and can entrust them specific duties.
Liberalization of pesticide trade had been welcomed because it had given benefit to the farmers. Unfortunately, this has not been entirely problem free. Some unscrupulous elements found opportunity to indulge in unethical activities such as:
Formulating pesticides using active ingredient in substandard quantity.
Adulteration at supply chain, packing, distribution and marketing level.
These malpractices are affecting the plant protection quality and causing damage to the environment.
Problems
Lack of awareness
The farmers have inadequate knowledge about pesticides as to their suitability, application techniques and safety measures. This is one of the reasons of poor pest control, environmental pollution and health problems in some areas. Programs for guidance of the farmers in this respect are far and few. The pesticide industry does not put sufficient resources on dissemination of knowledge on pests, pesticides, environment and management techniques. In this area there is great scope of extension work in the public sector.
Identification of pest problem
The stage of a particular insect pest is extremely important while determining the need for chemical treatment. Few insects can only be controlled at a particular stage where they have weak links in their life cycle. Care should be taken that the chemical sprays are directed where the pests are available. Clean cultivation helps to achieve better pest control. Those farmers who pay attention to these points, get more yield.
Selection of pesticides
Normally selective chemicals appear to offer an almost ideal means of pest control. However, only a few such chemicals have been discovered and developed for commercial use. The pesticides that are harmless to predators and parasites are ideal for IPM program. Although their numbers are limited but they are being widely recommended. Pesticides like Emamectin Benzoate, Abamectin, indoxacarb and spinosad are known to be selective in their mode of action. Until more selective pesticides are commercially available at reasonable expenses more judicious use of pesticides should be made.
Underdosing
Underdosing of pesticides brings more harm than benefit in the shape of triggering development of resistance in the pests. To get good control of pests, the recommended doses should be used. Sometimes the farmers reduce the dose thinking that the pest pressure is not much. Underdosing is helping in the resurgence of the pests. The problem of pest control is exaggerated. Insects develop resistance to insecticides more rapidly if underdosing is used. Small farmers tend to use less dose of pesticide.
Indiscriminate use of pesticides
Plant protection has become very specific and objective oriented. It is important to identify the problem first and then buy the chemical otherwise the money will go waste. Indiscriminate use will eliminate natural enemies and cause secondary pests to develop. Field biologists have studied the effects of improper pesticide use. The indiscriminate use of pesticides results in unsatisfactory pest control, environmental pollution and health problems.
LIST OF PESTICIDES BANNED IN PAKISTAN
Active Ingredients
|
1. |
B.H.C |
|
2. |
Binapacryl |
|
3. |
Bromophos ethyl |
|
4. |
Captafol |
|
5. |
Chlordimeform |
|
6. |
Chlorobenzilate |
|
7. |
Chlorthiophos |
|
8. |
Cyhexatin |
|
9. |
Dalapon |
|
10. |
DDT |
|
11. |
Dibromochloropropane + Dibromochloropropene |
|
12. |
Dicrotophos |
|
13. |
Dieldrin |
|
14. |
Disulfoton |
|
15. |
Endrin |
|
16. |
Ethylene dichloride + Carbontenachloride |
|
17. |
Leptophos |
|
18. |
Mercury Compound |
|
19. |
Mevinphos |
|
20. |
Toxaphene |
|
21. |
Zineb |
|
22. |
Heptachlor |
|
23. |
Methyl Parathion |
|
24. |
Monocrotophos (all formulations) |
|
25. |
Methamidophos (all formulations) |
Formulations
Dichlorvos (above 500 g/l)
Phophamidon (above 500
g/l)
Pesticides Not Registered
Aldrin (POP/PIC)
Mirex (POP)
Chlordane
(POP/PIC)
Dinoseb (PIC)
Ethylene di bromide (PIC)
Parathion
(PIC)
Fluroacetate (PIC)
QUESTIONNAIRE SUMMARY
Pakistan
Selected Country Statistics:
|
Agricultural Population |
75 million |
Agricultural Land |
22.1 million ha |
|
GDP $68 815 million |
Agric. GDP: 23.2% |
GNI per capita: $470 |
Hunger: 20% |
|
FAOSTAT Pesticide Data |
Export $0.6 million |
Import: $59.6 million |
Use: 22 482 ton |
GDP = Gross Domestic Product; GNI = Gross National Income; Hunger = Population below minimum energy requirement; FAOSTAT = latest data entry between 1998 and 2002
Institutional Profile
|
Ministry |
Legislation |
Registration |
Licensing |
Enforcement |
Testing |
Training |
Monitoring |
|
|
Environm. |
Health |
|||||||
|
Agriculture |
MINFAL |
PPD |
PPD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Environment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
Fed, Prov, Dist |
Public/Private |
Public/Private |
Public/Private |
Public/Private |
Industry Associations: CropLife Pakistan, PCPA,
PIFA
Non-Governmental Associations: Farmer Vision Forum, Punjab
Pesticide Dealer Assoc.
|
A. Pest and Pesticide Management |
|||
|
IPM policy declared? |
Yes |
||
|
IPM mentioned in... |
|
||
| |
Crop Protection Policy? |
Yes |
|
|
Agric. Sector Policy? |
Yes |
||
|
Other laws/documents? |
Yes |
||
|
National IPM Program? |
Yes |
||
| |
|
Dept: NARC |
|
|
IPM extension projects? |
Yes |
||
|
IPM research projects? |
Yes |
||
|
Pest resistance problems? |
- |
||
|
B. Testing, Quality Control and Effects |
||
|
Laws for pesticide specifi cations? |
Yes |
|
|
Low quality products in market? |
- |
|
|
Quality control laboratory? |
Yes |
|
| |
Own analyses in 2004: |
|
|
Outside analyses in 2004: |
|
|
|
C. Health and Environmental Information |
||
|
Data on pesticide poisoning cases? |
- |
|
| |
occupational exposure cases: |
|
|
accidental exposure cases: |
|
|
|
intentional/suicide cases: |
|
|
|
Pesticide poison facilities? |
Yes |
|
| |
Number of facilities: 2 |
|
|
Poison Information and Control Centers? |
Yes |
|
| |
Number of centers: 1 |
|
|
Significant environmental contamination? |
- |
|
|
Data on effects on wildlife & ecosystems? |
- |
|
|
Pesticide residue monitoring system? |
Yes |
|
| |
Number of analyses 2004: |
|
|
D. Pesticide Manufacture, Use and Trade |
||
|
Pesticide Volume |
Tons |
$'000 Value |
|
Imports |
40 482 |
147 860 |
|
Manufacture |
89 116 |
63 020 |
|
Exports |
0 |
0 |
|
Sales |
|
|
|
|
(formulated) |
|
|
Pesticide Use Profile |
Tons |
$'000 Value |
|
|
|
|
|
Agriculture (total) |
129 598 |
172 300 |
|
Insecticides |
94% |
|
|
Fungicides |
2% |
|
|
Herbicides |
5% |
|
|
Other |
0% |
|
|
Veterinary |
1 000 |
3 350 |
|
Public Health |
200 |
670 |
|
Household |
5 |
16 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
TOTAL |
|
|
|
E. Selected Standards of Code of Conduct |
||
|
Illegal trade estimates? |
Yes |
|
|
|
Estimated amount 2004: none |
|
|
Collection of old containers and pesticides? |
Yes |
|
|
Inventory of outdated/obsolete products? |
Yes |
|
|
Operational pesticide registration system? |
Yes |
|
|
|
Violations in 2004 |
|
|
Existing facility licensing system? |
Yes |
|
|
|
Inspections in 2004 |
|
|
Highly toxic products restricted? |
Yes |
|
Questionnaire responses: Yes = Yes; - = No;? = don't know; (blank) = no answer