Previous Page Table of Contents Next Page


Country review: Bangladesh


Peter Flewwelling and Gilles Hosch
[104] FAO Consultants, Fishery Policy and Planning Division, Fisheries Department
December, 2003

INTRODUCTION

Bangladesh[105] is rich in water resources, endowed with extensive flood plains drained by hundreds of rivers. Two large river systems, the Jamuna (Brahmaputra) and the Padma (Ganges), draining a substantial part of the north-eastern Indian sub-continent, laden with large quantities of suspended sediments, converge in Bangladesh’s interior, and give rise to a very fertile delta system irrigating the coastal plains of the Bay of Bengal to the south.

Bangladesh’s marine waters cover an area of roughly 166 000 km2, of which the EEZ accounts for 141 000 km2 (Flewwelling, 2000). The extent of the coastal shelf area (approximately 66 400 km2 to the 200m mark) is rather important. A dynamic system of estuaries, islands and chars[106] is located along the entire coast facing south (Mouths of the Ganges). Winter lasts for an average period of two months (mid-December to mid-February), with modal temperature values ranging between 25°-33°C, and average annual rainfall ranges between 1 700 mm to 3 200 mm. Bangladesh is prone to natural disasters, the most prominent being cyclones, storm surges and floods.

Population and economy

Population in mid-year 2002 was estimated at 135.7 million, growing at an average yearly rate of 1.7 percent. Illiteracy is estimated at 59 percent of population age 15+, rural population stands at 74 percent (i.e. 100+ million people), and 48 percent of children under the age of 5 suffer from malnutrition.[107] The total harvest of aquatic resources in Bangladesh (marine, inland & aquaculture) covers between 60-80 percent of the animal protein needs of the country, per capita consumption being estimated at 14kg/year (DANIDA/DFID, 2003). The contribution of agriculture to GDP dropped from just under 1/3rd in 1982 to just over 1/5th in 2002. Fisheries and aquaculture contribute 5.24 percent to GDP, and 4.76 percent to foreign exchange earnings through exports.[108] In 2001-2002 marine capture fisheries represented 22 percent of the total fishery production[109] in volume.

The dependence of the rural communities on fisheries resources, both inland and coastal, is very high. It must be noted that the inland fisheries, especially in floodplain areas, form a major part of fisheries in Bangladesh. According to recent studies and figures (DANIDA/DFID, 2003) it appears that around 1.1 million people - landless and landowners - are directly involved in capture fisheries (i.e. catching fish). Of these, 37 percent (444 000) are involved in the coastal and marine fisheries. Nationwide (marine and inland combined), another 11 million are involved in fisheries on a part-time basis, and three million more gain sustenance from the value-adding and marketing sub-sectors.[110] In Bangladesh, the poorest of the poor resort to fishing as a last livelihood option and represent the bulk of the fisherfolk. Table 1 provides an overview of the main marine fisheries capture sub-sectors, listing numbers of people participating in these fisheries, value added, and per capita daily returns on labour.

TABLE 1
Important marine fisheries sub-sectors, employment and returns (2000/2001)

Type of fishery

Output (mt)

Value added (Tk M)

Employment

Return on labour
Tk/day

Commercial gillnet

430 157

23 968

114 308

698

Artisanal ESBN/gillnet

30 259

1 404

17 500

267

Artisanal ESBN/beach seine

103 394

1 348

32 561

138

Shrimp trawl

7 864

397

2 100

630

Industrial trawl

15 326

83

900

307

PL collectors (M)

2 500

1 377

185 000

25

Totals

589 500

28 577*

352 369


Source: adapted from Table 8, “Marine Fisheries Sub-sectors”. (DANIDA/DFID, 2003)

Notes: this table integrates certain types of fisheries vertically (e.g. mechanized and non-mechanized gillnet fishery), so that figures do not coincide with figures in tables 2, 3, and 4; *: equivalent to US$484 356 000 at Sept. 2003 exchange rate US$1,00 = 59Tk (Sept. 2003 exchange rate)

POLICY FRAMEWORK

In 1998, a new National Fishery Policy was drafted and approved by the Government of Bangladesh (GOB). As its overarching goal, the Policy states, “poverty alleviation through creating self-employment and improvement of socio-economic conditions of the fishers”. This is in line with ongoing reforms in Bangladesh, hinging around a “pro-poor” growth strategy that the World Bank and the IMF are actively encouraging by pledging US$1billion in economic assistance for the fiscal year 2003-2004 (up 100 percent from the previous fiscal year), should reforms continue to progress at the present pace.

Inshore marine and estuarine fisheries are particularly affected by overfishing, environmental degradation, and multiple uses of water systems. The GOB has committed itself to protect the aquatic resources and habitats while seeking sustainable ways of maintaining resource benefits for the population. To this end, the government has drawn up a Perspective Development Plan for the period 1995-2010, providing direction to the fisheries sector and its development. Sustainable management of aquatic resources form an important part of the new National Fisheries Policy.

Specific objectives formulated in the last 5th five-year Plan (1997-2002) were:[111]

Notable in these objectives is the lack of responsible and sustainable management of fisheries. For example, the hilsa fishery[112], the most important fishery in Bangladesh, does not have appropriate management planning or control measures to protect it from over-exploitation. Responsible fisheries management remains a major challenge to the GOB.

LEGAL FRAMEWORK

The Department of Fisheries (DOF) falls under the administrative control of the Ministry of Fisheries and Livestock (MOFL) and is headed by a Director General (DG), who is assisted by three Directors and two Principal Scientific Officers. The organization between MOFL and the districts is ordered into three levels, i.e. DOF in the capital city of Dhaka, headed by a DG, 64 District Fisheries Offices (of which 13 are coastal) headed each by a District Fisheries Officer (DFO), and Sub-District Offices (Upazilla Offices) headed by an Upazilla Fisheries Officer (UFO). Upazilla Offices number over 460 in total. The Marine Fisheries Ordinance provides for the delegation of a range of powers (enforcement, etc.) from the Director General to DFOs.

The base law is the Marine Fisheries Ordinance of 1983. It is applied through rules (equivalent of regulations), which were enacted in the same year as Marine Fisheries Rules, and amended in 1993.

A listing of a range of legal instruments related to, or impacting, marine capture fisheries management follows in reverse chronological order (FAOLex). More details on these regulatory tools are included in Annex B.

Though not all current legislative instruments are listed,[113] it is apparent that the current legal framework is old. It is also an isolated body of law, focused on core fisheries issues and could benefit from jurisdictional linkages to coastal land use and tenure law, mineral exploration law, shipping law, water management law, etc.

The fisheries in Bangladesh are intimately linked to water resource management and land tenure considerations on the inland side, and integrated coastal zone management issues on the marine side. Multiple-use patterns of the coastal zone, notably between industrial fishers, artisanal fishers and aquaculture farmers indicates the need for a body of law that integrates the management with future requirements, e.g. impact of hydrocarbon exploration, etc.

The need for integration of legislation is currently being addressed through the ICZM Programme[114] which started in early 2002. This Programme provides a platform for decision makers and stakeholders to review current legislation related to the coastal zone through amendments, or to adopt a new integrated legal framework.

Current provisions in the ordinances and the rules are made for the protection and management of the resources, including, inter alia, the issuing of licenses, the keeping of logbooks, seasonal and spatial closures, effort control in industrial fisheries, gear specifications, as well as monitoring and law enforcement arrangements. Community-based fisheries management, and/or co-management arrangements are not part of the current management tools.

New legislation, banning in particular the practice of shrimp fry collection, aiming at phasing out the estuarine set bag net (ESBN) fishery, and foreseeing the declaration of an 800 km2 marine reserve in the “South Patches[115] is currently being prepared by the DOF.

STATUS OF THE FISHERIES

The fisheries of Bangladesh fall into two geographical categories, coastal/marine and inland fisheries. Fish production is supplemented on the national level by an ever more important aquaculture sector. Marine, inland and aquaculture sectors impact each other at various levels. Figure 1 retraces the growth in the three sectors over the last five years, showing the continued growth in all three, yet indicating a levelling off of inland fisheries output, and a decrease in relative contribution of the latter to the overall national production. The total marine catch in the 2001/2002 period amounted to 415 420 mt, up 52 percent from five years earlier.

Functionally, marine capture fisheries can be further subdivided into subsistence, artisanal, commercial and industrial fisheries, the lines between the first three sub-sectors being fluid. As is the case for inland fisheries, where catches are declining due to resource exhaustion, marine capture fisheries are faced with overfishing, rising conflicts and evaporating resource rent.

All marine fishing occurs within the 100 m isobath, deep-water pelagic and demersal resources remaining wholly unexplored and untapped by Bangladesh fishers, although there are reports of significant illegal foreign fishing offshore, but it is not addressed due to a lack of surveillance activity. The only industrial fishing developed in Bangladesh is operating out of Chittagong on the east coast. Figure 2 shows the volumes of the artisanal catch[116] and the industrial catch for three particular years over the last ten year period.

By volume, a fleet of 100 trawlers[117] lands only six percent of the marine catch, artisanal fisheries accounting for 94 percent of the production. Data provided by DOF, especially those relating to artisanal catches, need to be consulted and used with caution due to the significant variance in data from enumerators deployed under the DFOs and UFOs[118] to collect fishing effort data on the basis of gear units deployed per month per area monitored. These data are used to estimate total national catch on a yearly basis.

Table 2 provides an overview of the main industrial fisheries. There are only two distinct industrial fisheries in Bangladesh, and they target demersal shrimp and finfish resources.

FIGURE 1
Fish production by sector

Note: percentages indicate relative contribution to overall national production by volume
Source: DOF data


FIGURE 2
Catch contribution between artisanal and industrial subsectors

Note: percentage values indicate relative contribution of the subsistence/artisanal sub-sector to total marine catch by volume.
Source: DOF data

TABLE 2
Industrial fisheries 2001/2002 - overview

2 main gear types

Target species

Contribution to total marine catch (in mt)

Shrimp trawl

Shrimp


Bottom trawl

Demersal finfish

25 165 (6%)

Totals


25 165 (6%)

Source: DOF data

The most important small-scale/artisanal fisheries are reported by DOF as mechanized gillnet fishery, shrimp fry collection, estuarine set bag net fishery, and trammel net fishery (see Table 3). In addition to these, non-mechanized gillnet fishing (35 125mt - 2001/02) and longline fishing (23 841mt - 2001/2002) are reported as two other major fisheries. Although these fisheries fall under “small-scale”, it needs to be borne in mind, that some are carried out with the simplest of means for purely commercial reasons, the shrimp fry collection fishery being the perfect example.[119] The mechanized gillnet fishery is also a purely commercial fishery, carried out from small-scale motorized vessels.

TABLE 3
Small-scale fisheries 2001/2002 - overview

4 main fisheries

Target species

Contribution to total
marine catch (in mt)

Mechanized gillnet

Clupeidae
(Denua losa ilisha)

193 558 (10%)

Shrimp fry collection

Post-larval juvenile shrimp (PL)

2 500 (0.1%)

Estuarine set bag net fishery (ESBN)

Finfish and shrimp

121 251 (6%)

Trammel net fishery

Finfish and shrimp

9 605 (0.5%)

Totals


326 914 (16.6%)

Source: DOF data

TABLE 4
Fishers and their catches

FISHERY

VESSELS
2001-2002

FISHERS
2001-2002

CATCH
2001/2002

CATCH
1996/1997

CATCH
1991/1992

INDUSTRIAL

Shrimp trawl

n.a.

2 100*

8 553

7 741

7 386

Bottom trawl

n.a.

900*

16 612

5 823

2 255

Sub-total

100

3 000

25 165

13 564

9 641

ARTISANAL

Mechanized gillnet

18 992

100 000

193 558

127 725

122 935

Estuarine set bag net fishery (ESBN)

12 765

100 000

121 251

78 391

70 035

Trammel net fishery

1 103

500

9 605

3 679

3 715

Shrimp fry collection

none

400 000

2 500

n.a.

n.a.

Sub-total

32 860

650 000

324 414¨

209 795

196 685

TOTAL

32 940

653 000

349 579

223 359

206 326

Source: DOF data
Note: n.a. = not available
*: DANIDA/DFID data
¨: excluding shrimp fry collection

Shrimp fry collection, though very modest in contribution to total marine catch by volume, is thought to affect recruitment in wild populations, and the practice has come under serious scrutiny from the authorities. The same holds for the estuarine set bag net fishery (ESBN), which is becoming increasingly unpopular with the authorities, and has contributed especially to the overexploitation of white shrimp stocks.

In general terms, the coastal marine living resources have come under too much pressure from too many entrants into the various small-scale fisheries. There are tens of thousands of vessels, and hundreds of thousands of nets, lines and other pieces of gear that are concentrating in the inshore and coastal areas, targeting anything and everything from post-larval shrimp to mature finfish.[120] Conflicts within and between fisheries are rising, and scores of mechanized small-scale vessel operators are reported to be unable to cover operational costs - depending on the area and the fishery.

Catch per unit effort (CPUE) estimates and trends cannot be established for lack of appropriate data. One full frame survey was conducted in 1984, and no gear or vessel unit data had been collected until a “token survey” was carried out in 2000-2001, under which gear and vessel numbers were updated.[121] It is thus difficult to establish a clearer picture of exploitation patterns. In general terms, it appears that the coastal fisheries resources, traditionally less exploited than inland resources (see figure 1), have come under pressure, as faltering inland fisheries yield less and less. Effort has partially been diverted to marine waters, and the old tragedy of the commons is now showing in coastal waters, where “open access” is the current management strategy.

MANAGEMENT ACTIVITY

From a practical point of view, management activity can be subdivided into two parts: management of the industrial fisheries and management of the artisanal fisheries.

Regarding industrial fisheries (shrimp & fish trawlers), the following is to be noted in terms of moving toward managed fisheries: a) the vessels are being licensed, and b) the DOF has put a cap on the number of vessels permitted to enter the fisheries, currently standing at 100 units.[122] However, although some management tools are provided for in these fisheries (spatial closures, mesh size restrictions, etc.), specific, detailed fisheries management plans do not exist.

Other points to note regarding the monitoring of the industrial fisheries in Bangladesh include:

With respect to artisanal fisheries, DOF officials report that management and legal provisions are not implemented in the field, partly due to weaknesses of the Ministry responsible for vessel registration.[125] There are many fishing gears deployed that violate mesh size rules and other applicable restrictions. Closed areas are not actively policed, and licensing is not enforced. Vessel registration papers are a pre-requisite for obtaining a fishing license, creating a bureaucratic impasse that has led to an entire sector operating without licenses. This stands in diametric opposition with the legal provisions for licensing in the artisanal fisheries.[126] Discussions and trials concerning community-based fisheries management (CBFM) have been initiated under a joint FAO/UNDP initiative, but are not yet applied.

In practical terms, there appears to be little to no law enforcement in the artisanal fisheries. DFOs and UFOs do not have delegated authority to enforce the law in the field, this task falling under the central authority of the “Marine Wing” of the DOF. In consequence, marine artisanal capture fisheries can be portrayed as open access, unregulated, multi-gear and multi-species fisheries.

The Bangladesh Fisheries Research Institute (BFRI), a quasi-governmental organization, is responsible for fisheries research and development activities. In budget terms it is reported that costs for fisheries research have decreased, possibly due to the cessation of research vessel operations. Research results are being used to inform management decisions on gear restrictions, such as those being currently envisaged for shrimp larvae collection and the estuarine set bag net fishery (ESBN).

One challenge facing Bangladesh, as one of the least developed and poorer countries of the world, is food security. Overfishing and fishing down the food chain exacerbate the food security concerns in the immediate term, and for the future. Discarding, high grading, culling of catches, and capture of high levels of trash fish in both the coastal and offshore fisheries are also factors that may have a significant negative impact on food security in the long-run. These are a few areas where the Government of Bangladesh can take measures to address both sustainability of the marine resources and food security.

The management trends in Bangladesh have not experienced any rapid change due to the lack of funding and resources committed to sustainable fisheries management with the emphasis placed on enhanced production for food security.

COSTS AND REVENUES OF FISHERIES MANAGEMENT

The budget for fisheries management is reported as not having changed over the last ten years. In relative terms, Bangladesh currently directs some three percent of the total national budget towards the administration of the fisheries sector. In general terms it is reported that the limited funds available to the MOFL is hampering implementation of the management regimes.

Cost recovery is minimal, with no licenses being issued for 94 percent of the marine capture sector (by volume of landings), and hardly any penalties being applied. As mentioned earlier, only industrial trawlers pay licence fees. Taxes are reported as not applying in the fisheries.

IMPLEMENTATION OF GLOBAL FISHERIES MANDATES AND INITIATIVES

Bangladesh is currently not in a position to direct resources, human or financial, to address international initiatives in a substantive manner.

PARTICIPATION IN REGIONAL FISHERY BODIES

Bangladesh is a member of the Bay of Bengal Programme - Intergovernmental Organization (BOBP-IGO). This forum provides the MOFL and the DOF with “necessary support to conceptualize and implement management approaches in an effective manner”. Bangladesh is not a member of IOTC, which should be partly attributed to the fact that offshore pelagic resources are neither targeted nor exploited by Bangladesh at this point in time.

No national fisheries data are supplied to regional fisheries bodies.

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

Bangladesh is one of the least developed nations of this world, in which some ten to fifteen percent of the close to 138 million population is dependent on fisheries, and where fisheries is generally considered as the last bread-earning alternative for the poorest of the poor. Fisheries play a central role in the economy of the country and the food security of the people.

As inland fisheries landings have been reduced by overfishing, pressure on coastal fisheries resources has risen substantially over the last ten years, and coastal resource yields have started to decline substantially. Coastal fisheries, 94 percent artisanal by volume of landings, are mixed in terms of economic entrants (subsistence, mixed and commercial fishers), gears deployed and resources targeted. Access to the fisheries is open, and though rules are provided in the form of input controls, the implementation of regulations is weak. Offshore pelagic and deeper water resources are unexplored and unexploited. Signals of overfishing and stock exhaustion are perceptible and being reported from the coastal marine capture fisheries.

Inappropriate funding, weak institutional capacity and linkages, and an outdated legal framework all seem to contribute to an apparent paralysis of the fisheries management machinery. Delegation to, and empowerment of the DFOs and UFOs would be one way to bring fisheries management to the shoreline, and to start the process of administering the fisheries as provided for by the law.

In addition, the intricacies of rural livelihood strategies, the migration patterns, and the resource exploitation patterns within Bangladesh indicate the need for an integrated natural resource management plan, with marine capture fisheries being an inherent part.

REFERENCES

DANIDA-DFID. 2003, The Future for Fisheries. Findings and recommendations from the Fisheries Sector Review and Future Development Study, FAO Representation - Bangladesh, 65p. (available from http://www.lcgbangladesh.org/)

FAO. 1999a. Report of a Regional Workshop on Fisheries Monitoring, Control and Surveillance and Supplement 1, Country Reports, Regional Reports and Case Studies. Kuala Lumpur and Kuala Terengganu, Malaysia, June/July1998, FAO, Rome.

FAO. 1999b. Country Fisheries Profile and Management Brief for Bangladesh, http://www.fao.org/countryprofiles/

FAOLex Web site. Resumés of Fisheries Legal Texts. http://faolex.fao.org/faolex/

FAO Questionnaire, 2003. Overview of Marine Capture Fisheries Management - Bangladesh. FAO Rome. unpublished.

Flewwelling, P. 2000. Report on travel to Bangladesh. Mission Report No. 14, FishCode Project MCS, FAO, Rome.

Flewwelling, P. 2001. Fisheries Management and MCS in South Asia: Comparative Analysis. FAO, Rome.

ICZMP. 2003. Profile of the coastal zone of Bangladesh. Working draft. Programme Development Office, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Ministry of Fisheries (MOF). 2001. Brief on Department of Fisheries - Bangladesh. A5-size information brochure. 4p.

UNDP. 2003. Human Development Report 2003, New York - Oxford, Oxford University Press, ISBN 0-19-521915-5, 367p.

APPENDIX TABLES

Current management of marine capture fisheries

Level of
Management

% Fisheries
Managed

% with Fisheries
Management Plan

% with Published
Regulations

Trends in the number of managed
fisheries over the last ten years

National

<33%

<33%

>66%

unchanged

Regional

<33%

<33%

>66%

unchanged

Local

<33%

<33%

>66%

unchanged

Summary information for three largest fisheries (by volume) for the year 2001/2002

Category of
Fishery

Fishery

Volume
(mt)

Value*
mil USD

% of Total
Volume
Caught**

% of Total
Value
Caught**

Covered by a
Management
Plan?

# of
Participants

# of
Vessels

Commercial

Shrimp trawl

8 553

n.a.

34%

n.a.

No

2 100

44

Bottom trawl (fish)

16 612

n.a.

66%

n.a.

No

900

36

Artisanal

Mechanized gillnet fishery

193 558

n.a.

59%

n.a.

No

100 000

18 992

Estuarine set bag net fishery

121 251

n.a.

37%

n.a.

No

100 000

12 765

Trammel net fishing

9 605

n.a.

3%

n.a.

No

500

1 103

Shrimp fry collection fishery

2 500

n.a.

<1%

n.a.

No

400 000

None

Recreational

n.a.

n.a.

n.a.

n.a.

n.a.

n.a.

n.a.

n.a.

n.a. = not available
* Value in 2002 U.S. Dollars.
** % values are based on totals for each category of fishery.

Use of fishery management tools within the three largest fisheries

Category of
Fishery

Fishery

Restrictions

License/
Limited
Entry

Catch
Restrictions

Rights-
based
Regulations

Taxes/
Royalties

Performance
Standards

Spatial

Temporal

Gear

Size

Commercial

Shrimp trawl

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

No

No

No

Bottom trawl (fish)

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

No

No

No

Mechanized gillnet fishery

No

No

No

Yes

No*

No

No

No

No

Artisanal

Estuarine set bag net fishery

No

Yes

No

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

Trammel net fishing

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

Shrimp fry collection fishery

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

No

*: see footnote 20, page 9

Costs and funding sources of fisheries management within the three largest fisheries

Category of
Fishery

Fishery

Do Management Funding Outlays Cover

Are Management Funding Sources From

R&D

Monitoring &
Enforcement

Daily
Management

License fees
in fishery

License fees from
other fisheries

Resource
rents

Commercial

Shrimp trawl

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

No

Bottom trawl (fish)

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

No

Mechanized gillnet fishery

Yes

No

Yes

No

No

No

Artisanal

Estuarine set bag net fishery

Yes

No

Yes

No

No

No

Trammel net fishing

Yes

No

Yes

No

No

No

Shrimp fry collection fishery

Yes

No

Yes

No

No

No

Compliance and enforcement within the three largest fisheries

Category of
Fishery

Fishery

VMS

On-board
observers

Random dockside
inspections

Routine inspections
at landing sites

At-sea
boarding and
inspections

Other

Commercial

Shrimp trawl

No

No

Yes

Yes

No

No

Bottom trawl(fish)

No

No

Yes

Yes

No

No

Artisanal

Mechanized gillnet fishery

No

No

No

No

No

No

Estuarine set bag net fishery

No

No

No

No

No

No

Trammel net fishing

No

No

No

No

No

No

Shrimp fry collection fishery

No

No

No

No

No

No

Capacity management within the three largest fisheries

Category of
Fishery

Fishery

Does
overfishing
exist?

Is fleet capacity
measured?

Is CPUE increasing,
constant or
decreasing?

Have capacity
reduction
programmes
been used?

If used, please
specify objectives of
capacity reduction
programme

Commercial

Shrimp trawl

Yes

Yes

Decreasing

No

n.a.

Bottom trawl (fish)

Yes

Yes

Constant

No

n.a.

Artisanal

Mechanized gillnet fishery

Yes

No

Decreasing

No

n.a.

Estuarine set bag net fishery

Yes

Yes

Decreasing

No

n.a.

Trammel net fishing

No

Yes

Constant

No

n.a.

Shrimp fry collection fishery

Yes

Yes

Decreasing

No

n.a.

ANNEX KEY REGULATIONS AND ORDINANCES OF BANGLADESH

Source: FAOLex


[104] Note: The information for this paper was gathered from many multi-media sources, the internet, and papers, some published and some being "grey literature", but a key source was a 53 page FAO Questionnaire sent to fisheries contacts in each country to assist them in formatting their responses. Data provided in these questionnaires comes from officials and Department’s files, and are reported as "personal correspondence and discussions with Department officials". Additional information came from FAO, 1999a and 1999b, MOF, 2001, and UNDP, 2003.
[105] Note: The information for this paper was gathered from many multi-media sources, the internet, and papers, some published and some being “grey literature”, but a key source was a 53 page FAO Questionnaire sent to fisheries contacts in each country to assist them in formatting their responses. Data provided in these questionnaires comes from officials and Department’s files, and are reported as “personal correspondence and discussions with Department officials”. Additional information came from FAO, 1999a and 1999b, MOF, 2001, and UNDP, 2003.
[106] The word char or charlands is mostly used for newly accreted lands that can have the form of an island or an extension of the mainland coast. Coastal islands and chars are among the least known geographical entities of coastal Bangladesh for such reasons as remoteness, instability, and the resulting difficulties in mapping (ICZMP, 2003).
[107] Source: World Bank online database: www.worldbank.org/data/countrydata/countrydata.html
[108] Source: MOFL Data - total fisheries production, including marine capture fisheries.
[109] Combined inland, aquaculture and marine sectors.
[110] Solid figures on numbers of fishermen in inland and marine fisheries sectors vary between, and sometimes within reports. This is due to the weakness of the national census, combined with the colorful complexity of the fisheries sectors - leading to many studies having raised figures that all differ to some degree.
[111] The present government took the decision to move away from rigid 5-year planning to "rolling" 3-year planning. In September 2003, the first 3-year plan (2002-2005) had not yet been officially released.
[112] Hilsa (ilish) any of the members of the genus Tenualosa of the family Clupeidae. The Hilsa constitutes the largest single-species fishery of Bangladesh.
[113] Amendments to the 1983 Marine Fisheries Rules, enacted in 1993, are not listed. Their main thrust is the provision of MCS measures applicable to the artisanal sector. The same is true for the Fish and Fish Products Ordinance of 1983, which is not listed.
[114] ICZMP - Integrated Coastal Zone Management Plan, promoted by the UK, and the Netherlands, is implemented through the Water Resources Planning Organization (WARPO); Ministry of Water Resources (MoWR), Bangladesh
[115] Important spawning grounds for a range of finfish and shrimp species.
[116] Combining all subsistence & small-scale commercial fisheries.
[117] Industrial trawler companies are partly state owned.
[118] District Fisheries Officer (DFO) and Upazilla Fisheries Officer (UFO).
[119] The shrimp post larvae are being sold to aquaculture units.
[120] In the ESBN fishery alone, there is an estimated number of 50 083 (2001/2002 figures) operative units installed along the shoreline and up into the estuaries.
[121] It is the fact that catch statistics are based on gear units (which were not updated over a period of 17 years) that puts a question mark behind the reliability of catch estimates for the same period of time.
[122] Of which 15 have been granted access to the fishery by court order (Personal communication: Dr. Giasuddin Khan, Chief Fisheries Extension Officer, DOF)
[123] One for navigation, one for engineering and one for fish processing
[124] The only landing site for the industrial fisheries.
[125] Ministry of Shipping/Mercantile Marine Department
[126] The mechanized gillnet fishery was licensed in part through a DOF-led special initiative, but the non sustainability of the effort only gave rise to the fact that today some gillnet fishers are licensed, and others are not

Previous Page Top of Page Next Page