D., Grieve, C., Orr, P., Parkes, G. & Barker, N. 2006. Environmental benefits resulting from
certification against MSC’s Principles & Criteria for Sustainable Fishing.
London, MRAG UK Ltd. and Marine Stewardship Council. 134 pp.
Fishing south; the history and management of South Georgia fisheries. 132
Beechwood Avenue, St. Albans, UK, AL1 4YD, Penna Press. 128 pp. ISBN:
T., Greenhalgh, P. & Kleih, U. 2004. Policy research — implications of liberalization of fish
trade for developing countries: synthesis report. Chatham, UK, Natural
Commission. Brussels, 29.06.2005 COM(2005)275 final. Communication from the Commission to the
Council, the European Parliament and the European Economic and Social Committee:
Launching a debate on a community approach towards eco-labeling schemes for
for the ecolabelling of fish and fishery products from marine capture fisheries.
Rome, FAO. 90 pp.
for the Future II: Unilever’s Fish Sustainability Initiative (FSI), 2002.
P.R. & Viswanathan, K. 2004. Eco-labeling and fisheries management. WorldFish
Ecolabeling Network. 2004.
recipe for disaster: supermarket’s insatiable appetite for seafood.
of sustainable small-scale fisheries in developing countries. Workshop
B. & Esmark, M. 2002.
Clean conscience consumption of seafood — a summary of eco-labels and
environmental management systems for fisheries and aquaculture products. Working
Market-driven incentive structures for sustainable fisheries management. FAIR
CT98-4255, Final Project Report. Centre for the Economics and Management of
Aquatic Resources, University of Portsmouth, UK.
L. & Co-workers. 2006. Preferences for local, wild-harvested shrimp among coastal
tourists in South Carolina. IIFET 2006 Portsmouth Proceedings.
R.J., Wessells, C.R., Donath, H. & Asche, F. 2001. A contingent choice analysis of
ecolabeled seafood: comparing consumer preferences in the United States and
Norway. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 26(1): 20–39.
certification costs and benefits: case study of US retailers.
G., Banks, R, Phillips, M, Haylor, G., Mazaudier, L. & Salz, P. 2003.
Output 1 background paper on the international seafood trade and poverty. Prepared
under the DFID-funded ECPREP project (EP/R03/014) “International Seafood
Trade: Supporting Sustainable Livelihoods Among Poor Aquatic Resource Users in
Asia”. Poseidon Aquatic Resource Management Ltd. (UK), Network of Aquaculture
Centres in Asia–Pacific and STREAM Initiative.
Sustainable fishing and social well being: The Marine Stewardship Council and
the Fair Trade Initiative. ICSF.
Adding value to salmon helps capturing market shares. IIFET 2006
Association/IIED. 2000. Relevance of certification to fisheries in developing
countries. DFID Contract: 7381CA Final Report. London, Department for
Muldoon, G. & Scott, P. 2005. The International Standard for
the Trade in Live Reef Food Fish: from voluntary code to certification. SPC
Live Reef Fish Information Bulletin #15 – December 2005.
Consultants Ltd/IIED. 2003. Investment mechanisms for socially and environmentally
responsible shrimp culture (synthesis summary and working papers).
The Marine Stewardship Council Fisheries Certification Program: progress and
challenges. IIFET paper.
Eco-labels and fish trade. Marine Stewardship Council certification and the
South African hake fishery. Tralac Working Paper No. 9/2006.
Fishing for good. Forum for the Future.
C. & Sutinen, J. 2006. Trade and marketplace measures to promote sustainable
fishing practices. ICTSD Natural Resources, International Trade and
Sustainable Development Series Issue Paper No. 3. Geneva, Switzerland,
International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development and the High Seas
R., Asche, F., Kinnucan, H.W., Myrland, Ø., Young, J.A. & Anderson, J.L. 2006.
Investments in promotional activities in the food industry: Lessons for
trade and environmental effects of ecolabels: assessment and response.
Wessells, C.R., Johnston, R. & Donath, H. 1999.
Assessing consumer preferences for ecolabeled seafood: the influence of species,
certifier and household attributes. American Journal of Agricultural
Economics, 81(5): 1084–1089.