Assessment and management of biotoxin risks in bivalve molluscs

FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper No. 551


Assessment and management of
biotoxin risks in bivalve molluscs



Jim Lawrence
Consultant
Ottawa, Canada

Henry Loreal
Consultant
La Chapelle sur Erdre, France

Hajime Toyofuku
Section Chief (Food Safety)
National Institute of Public Health
Saitama, Japan

Philipp Hess
Director, Environment, Microbiology and Phycotoxin Research Unit
French Research Institute for Exploration of the Sea (IFREMER)
Nantes, France

Karunasagar Iddya
Senior Fishery Officer
Products, Trade and Marketing Service
FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department
Rome, Italy

and

Lahsen Ababouch
Director
Fisheries and Aquaculture, Policy and Economics Division
FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department
Rome, Italy

Download Full Report pdf file -4.7Mb      Download ZIP version zip file -4Mb


Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Rome 2011


ABSTRACT

Lawrence, J.; Loreal, H.; Toyofuku, H.; Hess, P.; Karunasagar, I.; Ababouch, L.
Assessment and management of biotoxin risks in bivalve molluscs..
FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper No. 551. Rome, FAO. 2011. 337 pp.

The present document compiles the scientific information collected by the experts for the Joint FAO/IOC/WHO ad hoc Expert Consultation on biotoxins in bivalve molluscs held in Oslo, Norway, 2630 September 2004 to answer the request of scientific advice expressed by the Codex Committee for Fish and Fishery Products (CCFFP). In order to satisfy the many requests received by FAO to disseminate the information collected over these years since 2004, the data and information available were edited and updated in 2009. The document is organized in three main parts that present scientific and technical information necessary for risk assessment, monitoring and surveillance programmes and, in addition, illustrate how the CCFFP used international expertise to advance and finalize international standards for bivalve molluscs.

Part I is introductory and presents general information on the shellfish toxins selected for their involvement in poisoning events or their bioactivity observed in laboratory animals in combination with their repeated occurrence in shellfish, their physicochemical characteristics and their biogenetic, microalgal origins. It also provides data on bivalve mollusc production and trade and poisoning caused by bivalve molluscs. Consideration is given to the complex chemical nature of phycotoxins that results in many difficulties in obtaining sufficient quantities of all analogues and hampers the development and validation of methods for the evaluation of their toxicity and efficient control of limits. These difficulties and their impact on consumer protection and shellfish production are further discussed.

The interactions between risk evaluation and risk management as integral parts of risk analysis are outlined in the last section of Part I. While these general principles make the Codex approach very clear, it must be noted that specific risk analyses are far from trivial, in particular because of the frequent lack of data on toxin analogues, relative toxicities, exposure and epidemiology. This lack in data often makes risk assessments provisional and requires frequent review of the assessment and the management options derived.

Part II compiles the toxin group monographs prepared by the experts for the Expert Consultation and updated in 2009. The toxins were classified into eight groups based on chemical structure: the azaspiracid (AZA) group, brevetoxin (BTX) group, cyclic imines group, domoic acid (DA) group, okadaic Acid (OA) group, pectenotoxin (PTX) group, saxitoxin (STX) group, and yessotoxin (YTX) group. The reason for this was that for enforcement of Codex standards, chemical classification is more appropriate for analytical purposes than classification based on clinical symptoms. Each toxin monograph contains the following subsections:

background information;
origins and chemical data;
biological data;
analytical methods;
levels and patterns of contamination of bivalve molluscs;
dose response analysis and estimation of carcinogenic risk;
evaluation;
references.

Part II is completed by the summary of the FAO/IOC/WHO Expert Consultation. One of the conclusions of the Expert Consultation is that decisions made on the safety of shellfish can only be based on the direct measurement of toxins in shellfish flesh; however, an integrated shellfish and microalgal monitoring programme is highly recommended to provide expanded management capability and enhanced consumer protection.

The summary of the Expert Consultation also includes the replies to specific questions posed by the Codex Alimentarius and the recommendations to Member States, FAO, WHO and Codex. Three appendixes provide additional scientific information:

Appendix 1 presents the concepts of marker compounds and relative response factors (RRFs). In this discussion paper, the definitions, practicality and limitations in use of marker compounds and RRFs are examined in the context of analysis for marine biotoxins in shellfish.
Appendixes 2 and 3 present more detailed considerations about the marine biotoxin action plan and the role and design of phytoplankton monitoring in harmful algal bloom (HAB) programmes, from the documents collated by Working Group 3 of the Expert Consultation in 2004.

Part III illustrates how the Codex Alimentarius handled and used the expert recommendations for the management of the risk of biotoxins in bivalve molluscs. Three documents are provided:

Report of the Working Group on assessing advice from the ad hoc expert consultation on biotoxins in bivalve molluscs;
Codex Code of Practice for Processing Live and Raw Bivalve Molluscs;
Codex Standard for Live and Raw Bivalve Molluscs.



Table of Contents

Preparation of this document
Preparation of this document
Abstract
List of tables and figures
Acknowledgements
Abbreviations and acronyms

  pdf file [352Kb]
   

PART I: INTRODUCTION ON BIOTOXINS AND BIVALVE MOLLUSCS

  pdf file [555Kb]
   

PART II: ASSESSMENT OF THE RISK OF BIOTOXINS IN BIVALVE MOLLUSCS

Azaspiracids
Brevetoxins
Cyclic imines (gymnodimine, spirolides, pinnatoxins, pteriatoxins prorocentrolide and spiro-prorocentrimine)
Domoic acid
Okadaic acid
Pectenotoxins
Saxitoxins
Yessotoxins
Summary of the FAO/IOC/WHO Expert Consultation on biotoxins in bivalve molluscs
Appendixes

  pdf file [2.5Mb]
   

PART III: RISK MANAGEMENT OF BIOTOXINS IN BIVALVE MOLLUSCS

  pdf file [540Kb]


product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of FAO.

ISBN 978-92-5-107003-1

nformation product. Non-commercial uses will be authorized free of charge, upon request. Reproduction for resale or other commercial purposes, including educational purposes, may incur fees. Applications for permission to reproduce or disseminate FAO copyright materials, and all other queries concerning rights and licences, should be addressed by e-mail to copyright@fao.org or to the Chief, Publishing Policy and Support Branch, Office of Knowledge Exchange, Research and Extension, FAO, Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, 00153 Rome, Italy.

 

© FAO 2012