Implications of timber supply reductions on harvested areas.
|
|
Stocking Level (m³/ha) |
Change in Harvest |
Change in Area Harvested | |
|
US West (Private) | ||||
|
|
Westside |
492 |
2.6 |
5,285 |
|
|
Eastside |
296 |
1.6 |
5,405 |
|
|
Interior |
237 |
2.7 |
11,392 |
|
US South |
228 |
4.1 |
17,982 | |
|
US North |
200 |
1.1 |
5,500 | |
|
US West (Public) | ||||
|
|
Westside |
530 |
-8.4 |
-15,849 |
|
|
Eastside |
296 |
-3.3 |
-11,149 |
|
|
Interior |
258 |
-1.3 |
-5,039 |
|
Coastal B.C. |
424 |
-5.5 |
-12,972 | |
|
Interior B.C. |
370 |
-14.8 |
-40,000 | |
|
Eastern Canada |
200 |
1.2 |
6,000 | |
|
Japan |
107 |
0.7 |
6,542 | |
|
Finland |
183 |
2.3 |
12,568 | |
|
Sweden |
209 |
0.7 |
3,349 | |
|
West Europe |
176 |
3.8 |
21,591 | |
|
AREA OF HABITAT PRESERVED: |
85,008 | |||
|
AREA HARVESTED TO PARTIALLY OFFSET REDUCTION IN TIMBER SUPPLY: |
95,615 | |||
|
RATIO OF AREA HARVESTED TO AREA PRESERVED: |
1,12 | |||
|
TOTAL AREA REQUIRED TO COMPENSATE FOR THE FULL REDUCTION IN TIMBER SUPPLY: |
153,077 | |||
|
RATIO OF AREA HARVESTED TO AREA PRESERVED: (for full compensation of timber reduction) |
1.80 | |||
Source: Perez-Garcia. 1993. Global Forestry Impacts of Reducing Softwood Supplies from North America
Implications of timber supply reductions on harvested areas WITH A SIBERIAN RESPONSE.
|
|
Stocking Level (m³/ha) |
Change in Harvest |
Change in Area Harvested (hectares) | |
|
US West (Private) | ||||
|
|
Westside |
492 |
0.9 |
1,829 |
|
|
Eastside |
296 |
1.4 |
4,730 |
|
|
Interior |
237 |
2.1 |
8,861 |
|
US South |
228 |
2.6 |
11,404 | |
|
US North |
200 |
0.8 |
4,000 | |
|
US West (Public) | ||||
|
|
Westside |
530 |
-8.4 |
-15,849 |
|
|
Eastside |
296 |
-3.3 |
-11,149 |
|
|
Interior |
258 |
-1.3 |
-5,039 |
|
Coastal B.C. |
424 |
-5.5 |
-12,972 | |
|
Interior B.C. |
370 |
-14.8 |
-40,000 | |
|
Eastern Canada |
200 |
1.2 |
6,000 | |
|
Japan |
107 |
0.3 |
2,804 | |
|
Finland |
183 |
1.7 |
9,290 | |
|
Sweden |
209 |
0.5 |
2,392 | |
|
West Europe |
176 |
2.7 |
15,341 | |
|
SIBERIA |
112 |
7.7 |
68,750 | |
|
AREA OF HABITAT PRESERVED: |
85,008 | |||
|
AREA HARVESTED TO PARTIALLY OFFSET REDUCTION DM TIMBER SUPPLY: |
135,400 | |||
|
RATIO OF AREA HARVESTED TO AREA PRESERVED: |
1.59 | |||
|
TOTAL AREA REQUIRED TO COMPENSATE FOR THE FULL REDUCTION IN TIMBER SUPPLY: |
205,882 | |||
|
RATIO OF AREA HARVESTED TO AREA PRESERVED: (for full compensation of timber reduction) |
2.42 | |||
Source: Perez-Garcia. 1993. Global Forestry Impacts of Reducing Softwood Supplies from North America
Impact summary for the environmental restriction scenario for the year 2000.
|
|
SAWLOGS |
SAWNWOOD |
PLYWOOD | ||||||||||||
|
REGION |
prod |
cons |
exp |
imp |
price |
prod |
cons |
exp |
imp |
price |
prod |
cons |
exp |
imp |
price |
|
Westside Private |
0.4 |
-2.3 |
-3.3 |
|
2.3 |
-1.2 |
-0.1 |
-1.9 |
|
2.1 |
-0.4 |
-0.1 |
-0.3 |
|
1.7 |
|
Westside Public |
-6.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eastside Private |
0.2 |
0.2 |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
Eastside Public |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inland Private |
0.9 |
-2.0 |
|
|
2.2 |
-0.8 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
-0.1 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
Inland Public |
-2.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alaska |
|
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
California |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US South |
1.1 |
1.1 |
|
|
0.7 |
0.2 |
-0.1 |
0.1 |
-0.2 |
1.9 |
0.3 |
-0.1 |
0.3 |
|
1.7 |
|
US North |
0.3 |
0.3 |
|
|
0.7 |
0.1 |
-0.1 |
|
-0.3 |
2.1 |
|
-0.1 |
|
-0.1 |
1.7 |
|
BC Canada |
0.6 |
0.6 |
|
|
0.3 |
0.2 |
-0.1 |
0.2 |
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
Interior Canada |
1.0 |
1.0 |
|
|
0.3 |
0.4 |
|
0.4 |
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eastern Canada |
0.8 |
0.8 |
|
|
0.4 |
0.4 |
|
0.4 |
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chile |
|
-0.5 |
0.5 |
|
2.3 |
-0.3 |
|
-0.2 |
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Japan |
0.2 |
-2.3 |
|
-2.6 |
2.3 |
-1.5 |
-0.2 |
|
1.4 |
2.1 |
|
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
Korea |
|
-0.1 |
|
-0.2 |
2.3 |
-0.1 |
-0.1 |
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
China |
|
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taiwan |
|
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soviet West |
|
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
Soviet East |
|
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Zealand |
|
|
0.1 |
|
2.3 |
-0.1 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
(see notes at the end of Table 1)Source: Perez-Garcia. 1991. An Assessment of the Impacts of Recent Environmental and Trade Restrictions on Timber Harvest and Exports
Impact summary for the environmental and trade restrictions scenario for the year 2000.
|
|
SAWLOGS |
SAWNWOOD |
PLYWOOD | ||||||||||||
|
REGION |
prod |
cons |
exp |
imp |
price |
prod |
cons |
exp |
imp |
price |
prod |
cons |
exp |
imp |
price |
|
Westside Private |
0.3 |
-3.8 |
-2.8 |
|
2.4 |
-1.5 |
-0.1 |
-2.1 |
|
2.1 |
-0.5 |
-0.1 |
-0.4 |
|
1.7 |
|
Westside Public |
-6.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eastside Private |
0.2 |
0.2 |
|
|
0.9 |
0.1 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
0.1 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
Eastside Public |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inland Private |
0.9 |
-2.0 |
|
|
2.1 |
-0.8 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
-0.1 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
Inland Public |
-2.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alaska |
|
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
California |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US South |
1.1 |
1.1 |
|
|
0.7 |
0.2 |
-0.1 |
0.1 |
-0.2 |
1.9 |
0.4 |
-0.1 |
0.4 |
|
1.7 |
|
US North |
0.3 |
0.3 |
|
|
0.7 |
0.1 |
-0.1 |
|
-0.3 |
2.1 |
|
-0.1 |
|
-0.1 |
1.7 |
|
BC Canada |
0.6 |
0.6 |
|
|
0.3 |
0.2 |
-0.1 |
0.2 |
|
2.1 |
|
-0.1 |
|
-0.1 |
1.7 |
|
Interior Canada |
1.0 |
1.0 |
|
|
0.3 |
0.4 |
|
0.4 |
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eastern Canada |
0.8 |
0.8 |
|
|
0.4 |
0.4 |
|
0.4 |
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chile |
|
-0.5 |
0.5 |
|
2.4 |
-0.3 |
|
-0.2 |
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Japan |
0.3 |
-1.7 |
|
-2.0 |
2.4 |
-1.5 |
-0.2 |
|
1.1 |
2.1 |
|
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
Korea |
|
-0.1 |
|
-0.2 |
2.4 |
-0.1 |
-0.1 |
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
China |
|
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taiwan |
|
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soviet West |
|
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
Soviet East |
|
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Zealand |
|
|
0.1 |
|
2.4 |
-0.1 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
(see notes at the end of Table 1)Source: Perez-Garcia. 1991. An Assessment of the Impacts of Recent Environmental and Trade Restrictions on Timber Harvest and Exports
Impact summary for the environmental and trade restrictions with high soviet output scenario for the year 2000.
|
|
SAWLOGS |
SAWNWOOD |
PLYWOOD | ||||||||||||
|
REGION |
prod |
cons |
exp |
imp |
price |
prod |
cons |
exp |
imp |
price |
prod |
cons |
exp |
imp |
price |
|
Westside Private |
0.7 |
-2.4 |
-3.7 |
|
2.2 |
-0.9 |
-0.1 |
-1.7 |
|
1.9 |
-0.3 |
-0.1 |
-0.3 |
|
1.6 |
|
Westside Public |
-6.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eastside Private |
0.2 |
0.2 |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
Eastside Public |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inland Private |
0.7 |
-2.2 |
|
|
1.9 |
-0.9 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
-0.1 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
Inland Public |
-2.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alaska |
|
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
California |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US South |
1.0 |
1.0 |
|
|
0.6 |
0.2 |
-0.1 |
0.1 |
-0.2 |
1.7 |
0.2 |
|
0.3 |
|
1.6 |
|
US North |
0.3 |
0.3 |
|
|
0.6 |
0.1 |
-0.1 |
|
-0.3 |
1.9 |
|
-0.1 |
|
-0.1 |
1.6 |
|
BC Canada |
0.5 |
0.5 |
|
|
0.2 |
0.2 |
-0.1 |
0.2 |
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
Interior Canada |
0.9 |
0.9 |
|
|
0.3 |
0.4 |
|
0.4 |
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eastern Canada |
0.7 |
0.7 |
|
|
0.3 |
0.3 |
|
0.4 |
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chile |
|
-0.5 |
0.5 |
|
2.4 |
-0.3 |
|
-0.2 |
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Japan |
0.2 |
-1.9 |
|
-2.1 |
2.3 |
-1.2 |
-0.2 |
|
1.1 |
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
Korea |
|
-0.1 |
|
-0.2 |
2.4 |
-0.1 |
-0.1 |
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
China |
|
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taiwan |
|
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soviet West |
|
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
Soviet East |
0.8 |
|
0.8 |
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Zealand |
|
|
0.1 |
|
2.3 |
-0.1 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
-0.2 |
|
|
|
|
(see notes at the end of Table 1)Source: Perez-Garcia. 1991. An Assessment of the Impacts of Recent Environmental and Trade Restrictions on Timber Harvest and Exports
